ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Electronic UNIT CODE: MAN3655 NAME OF STUDENT (PRINT CLEARLY) STUDENT ID. NO. 10101160 TITLE: Workplace Learning & Development Towers Ben NAME OF LECTURER(s) DUE DATE Tara Smith & Jenni Parker Friday 26 August, 2011 Topic of assignment - Assignment 1 - Job Application & ePortfolio ePortfolio URL ( eg: http://jennipeportfolio.yolasite.com) so we can access YOUR e-portfolio for marking. URL = http://bentowerseporfolio.weebly.com Group or tutorial (if applicable) On-Campus JO or Off Campus _____ Course Campus BUSINESS JO I certify that the attached assignment is my own work and that any material drawn from other sources has been acknowledged. OFFICE USE ONLY Copyright in assignments remains my property. I grant permission to the University to make copies of assignments for assessment, review and/or record keeping purposes. I note that the University reserves the right to check my assignment for plagiarism. Should the reproduction of all or part of an assignment be required by the University for any purpose other than those mentioned above, appropriate authorisation will be sought from me on the relevant form. Submitting this paper electronically as per instructions for the unit, place an ‘X’ in the box below to indicate that you have read this form and filled it in completely and that you certify as above. Please include this page in/with your submission. Any electronic responses to this submission will be sent to your ECU email address. Agreement agreed Date PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES ON LATE ASSIGNMENTS - Refer to the University Admission, Enrolment and Academic Progress Rule 24 and the ECU Assessment Policy A student who wishes to defer the submission of an assignment must apply to the lecturer in charge of the relevant unit or course for an extension of the time within which to submit the assignment. Where an extension is sought for the submission of an assignment the application must : be in writing - preferably before the due date; and set out the grounds on which deferral is sought. ( see ECU Assessment Policy) http://intranet.ecu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/20025/assign_ext.pdf Assignments submitted after the normal or extended date without approval shall incur a penalty of loss of marks. (see 39.5) ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT Rules (Students) All forms of cheating, plagiarism or collusion are regarded seriously and could result in penalties including loss of marks, exclusion from the unit or cancellation of enrolment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASK Job Application Selection Criteria Response Form (Maximum 2 pages – type your responses below each criteria) Selection criteria 1: Justify the need for and importance of, learning and development to support the achievement of organisational goals. The world of business throughout the last 20 years has experienced rapid change and growth due to the introduction of modern technologies that have opened the doors of globalization. From these advancements the focus has shifted from education and teaching to learning and/or competence development (Illeris, 2003). To keep up with these trends of growth, organizations have become more aware of the importance of learning and development of employees in order to keep up with competitors. Flexibility within an organization has become crucial part to companies striving to become industry leaders since the introduction of globalisation that requires constant training of employees to keep up with the rapid growth and advancement in technology. A focus on development of individual employees skills has become a popular tool in order for companies to compete, as an organization should consciously and intentionally devote to the facilitation of individual learning in order to continuously transform the entire organization and its contexts to help achieve individual goals and organizational goals (Catherine Wang, 2003). The growing importance of learning for organisations’ survival is usually attributed to an organizational world becoming increasingly complex and knowledge based, with technological changes following each other ever faster and markets getting more and more dispersed (Poell, R. F., Chivers, G. E., Van der Krogt, F. J., Danny, A. & Rob, F. 2000). Since the movement of HRM in the early 90’s companies are beginning to appreciate the importance of managing their employees and what their requirements are. Commonly companies are relying on the development of skills, knowledge and attitudes to be done by the employee, employees have also become more and more responsible for their own learning, in order to ensure their employability (Poell, R. F., Chivers, G. E., Van der Krogt, F. J., Danny, A. & Rob, F. 2000). Through the teaching of new skills and giving employees a more autonomy working environment companies can improve how well they retain there staff. With the world of technology likely to continue expanding and offering new opening in how organisations are run, HR managers will have to continue to implement the appropriate processes to encourage and manage learning and development in order for that organisation to be successful. Selection criteria 2: Compare and contrast the 4 major learning theories: (Behaviourist, Cognitivist, Humanist, and Constructivist) The behaviourist view of learning assumes a learner is essentially passive, responding to environmental stimuli (Behaviorism, 2011). A well known experient was performed by Ivan Pavlov called ‘Pavlovs dog’ is commonly used when describing what behaviourism is and how it can be applied to certain situations. The experiment entailed Ivan ringing a bell when ever it was time for the dog to eat, after performing this routine several times, Ivan began to ring the bell without giving the dog food and found that the dog would still salivate in preparation for food, this what is to be considered a behaviousistic way of learning. Operant conditioning is commonly refered when discussing behaviousist learning (also broken down into positive and negative reinforcement), behavioural learning is really about the increased probability of a behaviour based on reinforcement which has taken place in the past, so that the antecedents of the new behavior include the consequences of previous behavior (Atherton, 2010). Cognitive reinforcement is the assumption that humans are logical beings that make the choices that make the most sense to them. Pure cognitive theory largely rejects behaviorism on the basis that behaviorism reduces complex human behavior to simple cause and effect (Fritscher, 2011). There is also a sub set theory of cognitive learning which is known as social cognitive theory, this theory looks more into the social influences on logical choices and how they can be influenced, common example of this is advertising of products and a way of life e.g. quit smoking campaigns. Humanistic learning theory is learning experiences aligned with human’s natural desires and inclinations this is believed to result in real learning. Humanistic approach is related to selfactualisation and how one is able to actualise capacities and potentialities found. (Johnson, 2010). Martin Luther King would be considered a humanistic approach as he was self-taught and acted/discovered his true inner desire. Constructivist learning refers to the idea that learners construct knowledge for themselves; each learner individually (and socially) constructs meaning as he or she learns (Hein, 1991). Constructivist is commonly related to the teaching of Christianity, as each person who reads the information on the religion and different stories although the same all construct their own meaning of the story. It is important for managers of all levels to understand appreciate each of the 4 learning theories as they can offer many tools of how to manage and improve employees. Something which should never be taken for granted by managers is the realisation that not every employee learns the same way and the importance to be willing to accommodate different learning styles to help improve employee’s efficiency. Although there is much importance of the manager understanding all learning styles it can also be useful for the employee to accommodate each of the learning styles as it can help then when throughout the process of learning and development. References Behaviorism. (2011, August). Retrieved August 20, 2011, from Learning Theories: http://www.learning-theories.com/behaviorism.html Atherton, J. (2010, february 10). Behaviourism. Retrieved August 17, 2011, from Learning and teaching: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/behaviour.htm Catherine Wang, P. A. (2003). Orgainsational learning: A critical review. The Learning Organisation, 8-17. Fritscher, L. (2011, April 2). Cognitive theory. Retrieved August 24, 2011, from About: http://phobias.about.com/od/glossary/g/cognitivethedef.htm Hein, G. E. (1991). Contructivist Learning Theory. The museum and the needs of people. Jerusalem: Lesley College. Johnson, D. A. (2010, June 30). Humanistic approach part one. Retrieved from Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVw_QDuUHzE Illeris, K. (2003). Workplace learning and learning theory. Journal of Workplace learning, 15(4), pp. 12-22. Poell, R. F., Chivers, G. E., Van der Krogt, F. J., Danny, A. & Rob, F. (2000). Learning network theory Management Learning, 31(1), pp. 25-50. Senge, P. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the learning organization, Doubleday, New York, NY. Job Application Marking Guide (10%) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Very effective Excellent Exceptional Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 5 6 7 8-10 Selection Criteria 1: Justify the need for and importance of, learning and development to support the achievement of organisational goals Does not justify the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Very limited justification (a very weak argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Paper is descriptive. Limited justification (a weak argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Paper is mainly descriptive. Fairly strong justification (evidence of an argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Selection Criteria demonstrates some analysis. Strong justification (a strong argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Selection Criteria demonstrates strong analysis. Selection Criteria 2: Compare and contrast the 4 major learning theories (Behaviourist, Cognitivist, Humanist, Constructivist) Not all learning theories are addressed. All learning theories are addressed, but it is mainly descriptive. All learning theories are addressed. Some aspects are compared and contrasted, but analysis is limited. All learning theories are addressed. Most aspects are compared and contrasted; there is evidence of some analysis. All learning theories are very well addressed. All aspects are compared and contrasted; there is evidence of significant analysis. Selection Criteria demonstrates very limited evidence of any academic research (textbooks only or poor journal articles). Selection Criteria demonstrates limited academic research (1 or 2 journal articles). Only the basic aspects are covered. Selection Criteria demonstrates some research (3 or 4 journal articles). Most aspects are covered. Selection Criteria demonstrates sufficient research (5 or 6 journal articles). All aspects are covered. Selection Criteria demonstrates the use of quality research articles (7+ journal articles). Justification of the importance L&D is clear. Demonstrates a depth of thought and insight into the subject. In-text and End-text contains many serious errors. Referencing is very poor, and does not follow ECU guidelines. Selection Criteria presentation is unprofessional. In-text and Endtext contains a number of serious errors. Referencing is poor, and does not follow ECU guidelines. Some aspects of the Selection Criteria are professionally presented. In-text and Endtext contains minor errors. Referencing is adequate. Not all ECU guidelines are followed. Most aspects of the Selection Criteria are professionally presented. In-text and End-text contains a few very minor errors. Referencing is good. Most ECU referencing guidelines are followed. Selection Criteria are professionally presented. In-text and End-text contains no errors. Referencing is very good. ECU referencing guidelines are followed. Selection Criteria are very professionally presented. Academic Skills ePortfolio Marking Guide (10%) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Very effective Excellent Exceptional Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 5 6 7 8-10 ePortfolio – essential items included Home page - introduction About Me page – bio & ECU email Blog page – min 2 posts Job Application page – selection file attached ePortfolio Design No images or links to other resources. Text is unclear &/or has serious punctuation and spelling errors. Some images or links to other resources. Text lacks clarity &/or has some punctuation and spelling errors. Some images or links to other resources. Text is fairly clear &/or has some minor punctuation and spelling errors. Many images or links to other resources are provided that are appropriate. Text is clear, one or two very minor errors. Significant appropriate Images or links to other resources are used to enhance the eportfolio. Text is clear, exact and engaging. No errors. Analysis conveys evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised. Beginning to reflect on workplace training & development in a different way. Analysis conveys extensive evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised. Demonstrates personal growth and workplace training & development awareness. Demonstrates an ability to reflect on most of own work. Begins to demonstrate good meta-cognition and provides examples consistently. Reflects well on all own work, demonstrates a range of meta-cognitive practices and provides many examples. eJournal (blog) Personal Response to class material, activities and readings No personal response is made to the issues or concepts raised in workplace training & development Analysis demonstrates very limited evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised in workplace training & development Analysis conveys some evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised in workplace training & development Personal growth (preparation of assignments, class activities) Does not reflect on own work at all and no examples are provided. Reflects on own work improvement on occasion but limited examples are provided. Demonstrates an ability to reflect on some of own work but examples provided are minimal. Critical Reflection (thinking and linking concepts to the big picture of workplace learning & development) No reference to workplace, or outside of class learning. No reflection on new concepts. Minimal reference to workplace, or outside of class learning. Reflects on new concepts but does not demonstrate how it fits in the bigger picture. References to workplace, or outside of class learning, but does not clearly link theory with real practice. Reflects on new concepts and is beginning to link them to the bigger picture. Significant references to workplace, or outside of class learning, and is beginning to link theory with real practice. Clearly reflects on new concepts and links new concepts in the bigger picture. Significant references to workplace, or outside of class learning, and clearly links theory with real practice. Clearly reflects on new concepts and demonstrates a clear understanding of how this fits in the bigger picture Very limited discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655. Some discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655. Substantial discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655. Extensive, reflective discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655 including reference to both the technical and workplace learning and development concepts covered. Learning strategies No discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655.