ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Electronic UNIT NAME OF STUDENT (PRINT CLEARLY) STUDENT ID. NO. CODE: MAN3655 10136461 TITLE: Workplace Learning & Development FAMILY NAME: MAO FIRST NAME: Yangyang NAME OF LECTURER(s) DUE DATE Tara Smith & Jenni Parker Friday 26 August, 2011 Topic of assignment - Assignment 1 - Job Application & ePortfolio ePortfolio URL: andymaoseportfolio.weebly.com Group or tutorial (if applicable) Course Campus On-Campus JO I certify that the attached assignment is my own work and that any material drawn from other sources has been acknowledged. OFFICE USE ONLY Copyright in assignments remains my property. I grant permission to the University to make copies of assignments for assessment, review and/or record keeping purposes. I note that the University reserves the right to check my assignment for plagiarism. Should the reproduction of all or part of an assignment be required by the University for any purpose other than those mentioned above, appropriate authorisation will be sought from me on the relevant form. Submitting this paper electronically as per instructions for the unit, place an ‘X’ in the box below to indicate that you have read this form and filled it in completely and that you certify as above. Please include this page in/with your submission. Any electronic responses to this submission will be sent to your ECU email address. Agreement Date PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES ON LATE ASSIGNMENTS - Refer to the University Admission, Enrolment and Academic Progress Rule 24 and the ECU Assessment Policy A student who wishes to defer the submission of an assignment must apply to the lecturer in charge of the relevant unit or course for an extension of the time within which to submit the assignment. Where an extension is sought for the submission of an assignment the application must : be in writing - preferably before the due date; and set out the grounds on which deferral is sought. ( see ECU Assessment Policy) http://intranet.ecu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/20025/assign_ext.pdf Assignments submitted after the normal or extended date without approval shall incur a penalty of loss of marks. (see 39.5) ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT Rules (Students) All forms of cheating, plagiarism or collusion are regarded seriously and could result in penalties including loss of marks, exclusion from the unit or cancellation of enrolment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ASK Job Application Selection Criteria Response Form Yangyang Mao 10136461 Selection criteria 1: Justify the need for and importance of, learning and development to support the achievement of organisational goals. In recent years, with the great development of the global economic, more and more organisations are become multi-national. As a result, the employees of the organisations have to know more and more knowledge of their jobs (Smith, 2006). For example, employees need to know the different culture so that they could work with foreign employees well in the group works. In addition, with the development of all kinds of technologies, the employees need to know more knowledge with their jobs (Collins & Halverson, 2009). For example, the computer technology is developed very fast these years so every employee needs to know how to use computers and the programs in their jobs. As a result, the organisations need to realise the importance of learning and development. In addition, with the help of learning and development, the employees could get the opportunities to reach the higher level in the organisation (Stone, 2010). As a result, learning and development could help the organisations to recruit and retain their employees (Bambach, et al, 2010). What is more, learning and development could help the organisations to avoid some hazards and make a good and safety work environment (Bohle & Quinlan, 2004). Not only the employees need the learning and development, the employers also need it. For example, with the development of the organisation, human resource management is playing a more and more important part in organisation lives. As a result, if the managers could not get the knowledge, they will feel hard to manage their organisations in the workplace (Robbins & Judge, 2010). Because of the importance and need of training and development of an organisation, more and more organisations have pay attention to this part in their organisational lives, even consider as the key strategy of the organisation. In addition, many organisations have made a lot of plans of training and development, some organisations even corporate with the outside organisations to make better plans (Robbins & Judge, 2010). With the better plans of training and development, the organisations could achieve their goals easily than others. Selection criteria 2: Compare and contrast the 4 major learning theories: (Behaviourist, Cognitivist, Humanist and Constructivist) For behaviourist, according to Tovey & Lawlor, learning is the acquisition of new behavior through conditioning (2011). In addition, there are two types of condition: classical conditioning and operant conditioning (Tovey & Lawlor, 2011). In classical conditioning, the behavior becomes a reflex response to stimulus. For example, if a person always struck a bell and then fed his dog, when the bell sounds the dog will start to drool because it knows that it will have some food. Operant conditioning is known as Radical Behaviorism which the behavior could be reinforced by a reward or a punishment. Which means a behavior may result in ways: first is reinforcement, which increases the likelihood of the behavior recurring. The second is punishment, which decreases the likelihood of the behavior recurring (Tovey & Lawlor, 2011). Cognitive theories is focus on explain brain-based learning and how human memory works to promote learning. There are two key assumptions: (1) that the memory system is an active organized processor of information and (2) that prior knowledge plays an important role in learning (Tovey & Lawlor, 2011). Humanism emphasises maximization of the trainees’ potential that learners can choose a veracious range of different methodologies to achieve the goal of the learning process (Tovey & Lawlor, 2011). Key elements envolves: learning how to learn, self-evaluation, and personal needs (Noe & Winkler, 2009). Constructivists theories is known as social constructivism which states that learning involves constructing one's own knowledge from one's own experiences. In addition, Constructivists points that knowledge is constructed when individuals engage socially in talk and activity about shared problems or tasks (Tovey & Lawlor, 2011). To sum up all the four concepts had their own advantages and disadvantage, we can use each of them to put into practice, people prefer Behaviourism in 1970s however it changes to constructivists nowadays, it can adopt almost every different work environments in the workplace, and works well so I highly recommended the constructivists into organisations. References: Bambach, M., Compton, R., Morrissey, W., Nankervis, R., Hor J., & Keats. L. (2010) Recruitment and retention. Sydney: CCH Bohle, P., & Quinlan, M. (2004). Managing occupational health & safety (2nd ed.). South Yarra: MacMillan Publishers Australia Noe, R. A., & Winkler, C. (2009). Employee training and development: For Australia and New Zealand. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Robbins, S., & Judge, T. (2010). Essentials of organisational behaviour (10th ed.). New Jersey USA: Prentice Hall Smith, A. (1998). Training and development in Australia (2nd ed.). Chatswood, New South Wales: Butterworths. Stone, R. J. (2010). Managing human resources (3rd. ed.). Milton QLD.: John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd. Tovey, M. D., & Lawlor, D. R. (2004).. Training in Australia : Design, delivery, evaluation and management (2nd ed.). Pearson: Prentice Hall. Job Application Marking Guide (10%) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Very effective Excellent Exceptional Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 5 6 7 8-10 Selection Criteria 1: Justify the need for and importance of, learning and development to support the achievement of organisational goals Does not justify the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Very limited justification (a very weak argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Paper is descriptive. Limited justification (a weak argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Paper is mainly descriptive. Fairly strong justification (evidence of an argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Selection Criteria demonstrates some analysis. Strong justification (a strong argument) of the importance of L& D for the achievement of org. goals. Selection Criteria demonstrates strong analysis. Selection Criteria 2: Compare and contrast the 4 major learning theories (Behaviourist, Cognitivist, Humanist, Constructivist) Not all learning theories are addressed. All learning theories are addressed, but it is mainly descriptive. All learning theories are addressed. Some aspects are compared and contrasted, but analysis is limited. All learning theories are addressed. Most aspects are compared and contrasted; there is evidence of some analysis. All learning theories are very well addressed. All aspects are compared and contrasted; there is evidence of significant analysis. Selection Criteria demonstrates very limited evidence of any academic research (textbooks only or poor journal articles). Selection Criteria demonstrates limited academic research (1 or 2 journal articles). Only the basic aspects are covered. Selection Criteria demonstrates some research (3 or 4 journal articles). Most aspects are covered. Selection Criteria demonstrates sufficient research (5 or 6 journal articles). All aspects are covered. Selection Criteria demonstrates the use of quality research articles (7+ journal articles). Justification of the importance L&D is clear. Demonstrates a depth of thought and insight into the subject. In-text and End-text contains many serious errors. Referencing is very poor, and does not follow ECU guidelines. Selection Criteria presentation is unprofessional. In-text and End-text contains a number of serious errors. Referencing is poor, and does not follow ECU guidelines. Some aspects of the Selection Criteria are professionally presented. In-text and End-text contains minor errors. Referencing is adequate. Not all ECU guidelines are followed. Most aspects of the Selection Criteria are professionally presented. In-text and End-text contains a few very minor errors. Referencing is good. Most ECU referencing guidelines are followed. Selection Criteria are professionally presented. In-text and End-text contains no errors. Referencing is very good. ECU referencing guidelines are followed. Selection Criteria are very professionally presented. Academic Skills ePortfolio Marking Guide (10%) Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Very effective Excellent Exceptional Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction 0 5 6 7 8-10 ePortfolio – essential items included Home page - introduction About Me page – bio & ECU email Blog page – min 2 posts Job Application page – selection file attached ePortfolio Design No images or links to other resources. Text is unclear &/or has serious punctuation and spelling errors. Some images or links to other resources. Text lacks clarity &/or has some punctuation and spelling errors. Some images or links to other resources. Text is fairly clear &/or has some minor punctuation and spelling errors. Many images or links to other resources are provided that are appropriate. Text is clear, one or two very minor errors. Significant appropriate Images or links to other resources are used to enhance the eportfolio. Text is clear, exact and engaging. No errors. Analysis conveys evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised. Beginning to reflect on workplace training & development in a different way. Analysis conveys extensive evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised. Demonstrates personal growth and workplace training & development awareness. eJournal (blog) Personal Response to class material, activities and readings No personal response is made to the issues or concepts raised in workplace training & development Analysis demonstrates very limited evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised in workplace training & development Analysis conveys some evidence of personal response to the issues or concepts raised in workplace training & development Personal growth (preparation of assignments, class activities) Does not reflect on own work at all and no examples are provided. Reflects on own work improvement on occasion but limited examples are provided. Demonstrates an ability to reflect on some of own work but examples provided are minimal. Demonstrates an ability to reflect on most of own work. Begins to demonstrate good meta-cognition and provides examples consistently. Reflects well on all own work, demonstrates a range of meta-cognitive practices and provides many examples. Critical Reflection (thinking and linking concepts to the big picture of workplace learning & development) No reference to workplace, or outside of class learning. No reflection on new concepts. Minimal reference to workplace, or outside of class learning. Reflects on new concepts but does not demonstrate how it fits in the bigger picture. References to workplace, or outside of class learning, but does not clearly link theory with real practice. Reflects on new concepts and is beginning to link them to the bigger picture. Significant references to workplace, or outside of class learning, and is beginning to link theory with real practice. Clearly reflects on new concepts and links new concepts in the bigger picture. Significant references to workplace, or outside of class learning, and clearly links theory with real practice. Clearly reflects on new concepts and demonstrates a clear understanding of how this fits in the bigger picture Very limited discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655. Some discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655. Substantial discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655. Extensive, reflective discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655 including reference to both the technical and workplace learning and development concepts covered. Learning strategies No discussion of your own learning and/or problem solving strategies used in MAN3655.