Name___________________________
RED 4350
Summer 2012
Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) Reflection—Lesson Plan
List how you fulfilled the following FEAP descriptors in creating your lesson plan and Webquest. On the following page,
write a paper using each line of the chart as a topic sentence for each paragraph (i.e. I aligned my instruction with
state-adopted standards at the appropriate level of rigor…)
FEAP Indicators: A. QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION
1. Instructional Design and Lesson Planning
A.1.a. Aligns instruction with state-adopted standards at the
appropriate level of rigor;
Briefly explain how you fulfilled each FEAP indicator in
your lesson plan.
I aligned my instruction with state-adopted standards at
the appropriate level of rigor by having students
research information on the main topics according to the
standards. Students were also to present and teach the
information learned to peers. Students completed a
review form to determine what they learned.
A.1.d. Selects appropriate formative assessments to monitor
learning;
The formative assessment selected in this project was to
provide feedback to students while teams worked
together. Being available to students during the project
and also asking questions about ideas and information
students wrote in journals.
FEAP Indicators: A. QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION
2. The Learning Environment
Briefly explain how you fulfilled each FEAP indicator in
your lesson plan.
I respected students cultural and family backgrounds by
having students work together and by helping each other
with the project. Giving students different roles allows
them to participate equally.
A.2.d. Respects students’ cultural and family background;
A.2.h. Adapts the learning environment to accommodate the
differing needs and diversity of students.
FEAP Indicators: A. QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION
3. Instructional Delivery and Facilitation
A.3.g. Apply varied instructional strategies and resources,
including appropriate technology, to provide
comprehensible instruction, and to teach for student
understanding;
A.3.h. Differentiate instruction based on an assessment of
student learning needs and recognition of individual
differences in students.
I adapted the learning environment to accommodate the
different needs and diversity of student by including
hard-copies of the webquest instructions, books, and
journals in the group kits.
Briefly explain how you fulfilled each FEAP indicator in
your lesson plan.
I applied varied instructional strategies and resources,
including appropriate technology, to provide
comprehensible instruction, and to teach for student
understanding by having students use computer to find
information and by giving students the opportunity to
create a presentation of their choice to allow them to use
their strengths in the project.
I used differentiated instruction based on assessment of
student learning needs and recognition of individual
differences in students by providing a kit with materials
for students who needed hands-on materials and
computers were available for those who work best with
technology. Students were given the choice to pick the
Name___________________________
RED 4350
Summer 2012
roles they wanted within the group to put their strengths
to work.
FEAP Indicators: A. QUALITY OF INSTRUCTION
4. Assessment
A.4.b. Designs and aligns formative and summative
assessments that match learning objectives and lead to
mastery
Briefly explain how you fulfilled each FEAP indicator in
your lesson plan.
I designed and aligned formative and summative
assessment that matched learning objectives and that
lead to mastery by creating a review sheet with
questions that the objectives specifies.
Name___________________________
RED 4350
Summer 2012
I aligned my instruction with state-adopted standards at the appropriate level of rigor by
having students’ research information on the main topics according to the standards. Students
were also to present and teach the information learned to peers which allowed them to review
what they had learned. Another review for students was to complete a review sheet to determine
what they learned from the research they did and shared with peers in their presentation.
The formative assessment selected in this project was to provide feedback to students
while teams worked together. Being available to students during their research time for the
project and also asking questions about ideas and information students wrote in journals.
I respected students cultural and family backgrounds by having students work together
and by helping each other with the project. Students had the opportunity to choose what role they
wanted to take on in the group and work together to contribute to the end project. Giving
students different roles allows them to participate equally and makes them feel responsible and
important to their team and team members.
I adapted the learning environment to accommodate the different needs and diversity of
student by including hard-copies of the webquest instructions, books, and journals in the group
kits. By providing these items to the students it allows those students who are kinesthetic learners
be a part of the team and understand better. Students had a variety of ways to understand and
complete the project if needed.
I applied varied instructional strategies and resources, including appropriate technology,
to provide comprehensible instruction, and to teach for student understanding by having students
use computer to find information and by giving students the opportunity to create a presentation
of their choice to allow them to use their strengths in the project.
I used differentiated instruction based on assessment of student learning needs and
recognition of individual differences in students by providing a kit with materials for students
who needed hands-on materials and computers were available for those who work best with
technology. Students were given the choice to pick the roles they wanted within the group to put
their strengths to work.
I designed and aligned formative and summative assessment that matched learning
objectives and that lead to mastery by creating a review sheet with questions that the objectives
specifies. The summative assessment allowed the teacher to see what students had learned and
what students did not grasp well during the project. This allows the students to ask questions and
find answers as a class until those questions are answered.