BKamber_PresentationAugust2010

advertisement

Ultra-high purity ICP-MS

BALZ S. KAMBER

Laurentian University www.chemicalfingerprinting.laurentian.ca

Drivers behind geo- and cosmochemical analysis

Desire to analyze subnanogram quantities of implanted solar wind, returned cometary material, dust in Antarctic ice, etc.

Analytic equipment: SIMS

Secondary ion mass spectrometer

Pros: Ideal for in situ analysis, quasi nondestructive, high spatial resolution, high mass resolution, for some elements ppt detection limits

Cons: sample in ultra-high vacuum, requires perfect surface for ppt analysis, matrix effects, slow, and $

Analytic equipment: ICP-MS

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer

Pros: ppq detection limits, can work in situ or analyze digests, samples at atmospheric P, matrix insensitive, fast, relatively inexpensive

Cons: destructive, requires more material than

SIMS, prone to blank contamination during sample preparation, may require elemental preconcentration

Solution ICP-MS

Instrumental limits: ICP-MS

Sensitivity:

Detection limit:

450,000 cps ppb -1

1 cps

Consumed mass: 2 grams

Absolute mass of detected material: 4-5 femtograms (10 -15 g)

Dilution factor (solution/solid ratio): 1,000

Hence in 2 g of solution, only 2 mg of solid translates to minimum detectable concentration of 4-5 nanograms g -1 (ppt)

Current standard practice for easy metal (e.g. Cu)

•Up to 0.25 g of sample dissolved

•Metal or alloy dissolves slowly in 10% HNO

3

, in pre-cleaned 0.25 L PP bottle

•Take 2 g aliquot, add internal standard for drift correction and run on ICP-MS

•Analysis includes a semi-quantitative mass scan

Simple metal results

Note outlier

Current standard practice for pesky metal (e.g. certain bronzes)

•Up to 0.25 g of sample dissolved

•Alloy attacked by aqua regia in ultra-clean

Teflon vials at 160degC, converted with HNO3 and taken up in 10g of 20% HNO

3

•Take 0.24 g aliquot, add internal standard for drift correction, dilute to 6 g with H

2

O and run on ICP-MS

•Abandoned U & Th pre-concentration (blank)

• Analysis includes a semi-quantitative scan

Current standard practice for Sibased, HFSE-doped chips

•Very small chips (a few mg) rinsed in ultraclean 5% HNO

3

•Attacked in ultra-clean Teflon vials with 0.25 mL HNO

3

160degC conc. and 0.5 mL HF conc.

•Conversion with HNO

3 to boil off Si as SiF

4 and taken up in a few g of 5% HNO

3 with internal standards

•Run on ICP-MS, including a semi-quantitative scan

Chip results 10 mg samples

Chip results sub 10 mg samples

Chip results semi-quantitative mass scan

Chip results semi-quantitative mass scan

Ideas for new procedures

•Wipes

•Metals and chips: improve detection limits by chromatographic matrix exclusion

•Pre-concentrated U and Th: improve blanks and counting statistics by laser ablation

•Addition of 234 U and 229 Th spikes

Wipes

•Combust in quartz crucibles in SNO above-ground facility

•Take-up ash into 6mL Teflon vessel

•Digest ash in 0.2mL HF

•Convert with HNO

3 and analyze in 2 mL of 5% HNO

3 with internal standards

•Common procedure for environmental samples (peat)

Matrix removal

•Previous efforts at pre-concentrating Th and U focused on ion chromatography that specifically retains U and Th

•This is the method preferred by Patricia

Grinberg

•For small samples, this method reaches a blank limit as the U-TEVA resin itself appears to contain a blank

•Alternative is to remove matrix (all 1+,

2+ and 3+ charged cations) on cation exchange resin

Analyze pre-concentrated U and

Th as a UV-laser induced aerosol

•Dry down U and Th pre-concentrate into inert clean Teflon vial

•Vaporize residue (and Teflon) with a few pulses of an Excimer laser

•Transport aerosol into ICP-torch in

99.9995% He clean stream

UV- laser idea

Analyze pre-concentrated U and

Th as a UV-laser induced aerosol

•Higher ionization efficiency, larger signal, lower blank

•But need for yield monitor: isotope dilution

•Addition of known amount of isotopically enriched 234 U and 229 Th

Outlook

•Simple metals with low contamination risk and wipes can be handled with existing protocols in lab

•Dangerous metals (Pb, certain bronzes) and HFSE-doped chips need to be digested in a nongeochemical/cosmochemical lab

•We can train personnel to learn these techniques

•Publication quality experiments should be performed by a Postdoc

Download