Citibank(C) in Asia Pacific: A Marketing Strategy Analysis

advertisement

Citibank in Asia Pacific

Introduction

• Citibank’s branch banking business conducted operations in 15 countries throughout Asia Pacific and the Middle East in 1989

• Citibank’s branch banking business was projected as a prestigious, consumer-oriented international bank and the undisputed leader in the marketplace

• Financial services were targeted to affluent upper and middle income market segment

• Citibank’s Asia Pacific branch banking business was challenged with increasing earnings from

$69.7MM to $100MM by 1990

Citibank’s Challenges

• Increase earnings in Citibank’s Asia Pacific bank business through the launch of a credit card product

• Obstacles:

– Mixed opinion from the Asia-Pacific country managers that a successful credit card launch was possible

– Questions abound regarding Citibank’s ability to adopt mass-market positioning to acquire credit card customer and maintain its up-market positioning with its current upscale branch banking customers

– Differing customer attitudes and usage patters across the

Asia Pacific region

– High level of market uncertainty across the region with regulations, branch limitations, talent, poor infrastructure, etc.

SWOT Analysis

Strengths

• Market Leader

• Branding

• Credit card considered a status symbol

• Targeted countries include booming, growing economies (Philippines, India) and affluent, Westernized countries

(Australia, Singapore), diversifying risk

• Strong economies of scale in data processing

• Hong Kong presence provides valuable data to estimate revenue impact and price credit cards accordingly

Weakness

Consumer attitudes and usage varies across countries

Australia & Singapore are saturated markets

Country managers are unconvinced/no buy-in.

Credit card offering adds complexity to organizational compensation structure

Cannibalization of current services

Brand dilution

Collections process is undefined

Centralized data processing costs, politics

Learning curve on demand side & cost side

Opportunities

• Penetration leader in new markets

• Target growing middle and upper class

• Portfolio allows for customization in markets

• Additional revenues from cross-selling and arbitrage

Threats

Fraud

Defaults

Laws and regulations

AMEX and Diner’s Club are early entrants with brand cachet

Competitors offer discounts

Acquisition Costs

Direct Mail

Direct Sales

Take One

Bind In

Unit Cost Prospects RR

1.5

300,000 0.02

Qualify Cards Card Customers Acq Cost/Card

0.67

0.8

3216 139.93

225,000 30,000 0.5

0.67

0.8

0.25

2,000,000 0.015

0.334

0.8

0.15

3,000,000 0.01

0.334

0.8

8040

8016

8016

27.99

62.38

56.14

Break Even Analysis

Scenario Target No

I

II

III

IV

Fixed Costs VC Total Costs Rev/Cust Break Even #

250,000

Acquisition Advertising Support ($25/card)

7,857,000 2,000,000 35,000,000 6,250,000 51,107,000

500,000 16,574,000 4,000,000 50,000,000 12,500,000 83,074,000

750,000 27,228,000 6,500,000 60,000,000 18,750,000 112,478,000

1,000,000 40,026,000 9,000,000 70,000,000 25,000,000 144,026,000

180

180

180

180

283,928

461,522

624,878

800,144

Break Even - Sensitivity Analysis

Scenario I

II

III

IV

120

425,892

692,283

937,317

1,200,217

Revenue Per Customer

150

340,713

180

283,928

553,827

749,853

960,173

461,522

624,878

800,144

210

243,367

395,590

535,610

685,838

240

212,946

346,142

468,658

600,108

Market Entry – Game Theory

Citibank

AMEX

Source: Demisch, McGarry, Mukhtar, Rajbansi; Feb 2008

Conjoint Analysis

• Build ideal mix of product attributes

• Determine customer segmentation

• Identify cannibalization & competitive response

Joining Fee

None

Low

High

Annual Fee

None

Low

High

Brand Services

Citi (Visa, MC) Card replacement

Amex

Visa/MC

Diner’s Club

Loss/misuse liability

Spending limit

Cash Advance

Incremental Revenue

Cash advance

Pre-payment

Advance ticket sales

Product warranty extension

Product/Travel insurance Local Bank Year-end summary

Cross-Selling

• Success selling auto loans through car dealers

• Greater potential with Citi cardholders

– Opportunity for cross-sell of products such as Auto Loans, Ready Credit,

Deposits, Mortgages

– Enables virtual presence in countries restricting number of foreign bank branches

• Bundle with bank services for lower combined fees

How calculate cross-sell value?

Take Hong Kong Citibank example where 6% of account holders also have Citi credit card and assume same opportunity in reverse…

Cross-Sell Value Calculation

Relative Year 1 (phased launch)

Total # cards

Proj. # Citi cards Yr 1

Proj. Citi card customers

Australia Hong Kong Singapore TOTAL

10.5M

2M 630K 13.1M

1M

588K

150K

88K

25K

15K

1.75M

691K

# of Citibank customers

Net Revenue from Fund

NRFF per customer (exact figure)

85K

$59M

$694.12

130K

$67M

$515.38

18K

$16M

$888.89

233K

$142M

N/A

Card holders w/ 2nd product

Incremental NRFF (cross-sell value)

35.3K

$24.5M

5.3K

$2.7M

0.9K

$784K

41.5K

$28M

Total Relative Yr 1 value for all 9 Asia markets would be

$29M

Assumes 1.7 cards per customer and 6% of card holders will purchase 2 nd Citi product as result of cross-sell efforts.

Percentage based on 6% of Hong Kong’s Citibank customers also owning Citi card.

Arbitrage Opportunities

Sample Exchange Rates

US $1 = HK $1.13

US $1 = Australian $1.33

HK $1 = Australian $1.18

Buy HK

$11.3M with US

$10M

Buy Aus

$13.334M with HK

$11.3M

Buy US

$10.025M with Aus

$13.334M

Triangular Arbitrage Example = US $25K Profit!

Across Citibank’s Asia-Pacific customer accounts =

$1.5M+ per turn.

100

10

1

Market Segmentation

Total Per Capita Urban Population

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Estimated Distribution of Population and Cards by Income

$6K-$12.5K

$12.5K-$25K >$25K

3

2

1

0

6

5

4

Urban Population Without Credit Cards

$6K-$12.5K

$12.5K-$25K

Market Segmentation

Per Capita

Real GNP

1988 Growth Rate

1988 Inflation

Average Annual

Customer Income

Political/Economic

Risk Factors

Australia India Indonesia Malaysia Phillipines Singapore Taiwan Thailand

Weight Data Rating India Rating Data Rating Data Rating Data Rating Data Rating Data Rating Data Rating

25% 11929 5 279 1 338 1 2018 3 527 2 8817 5 4837 3 930 2

10% $196.80

5 $222.50

5 $63.40

3 $34.10

2 $32.60

2 $23.80

1 $95.80

4 $51.10

3

10% 4 2 9.7

4 4.8

2 8.1

4 6.8

3 11 5 7.3

3 10.8

5

10% 7.6

3 9.8

2 8 3 2 5 8.7

2 1.5

5 1.2

5 3.8

4

15% $60,000 5 $10,000 2 $24,000 4 $14,000 3 $10,000 2 $20,000 4 $25,000 4 $15,000 3

30% A 5 C 3 C 3 B 4 D 2 B 4 A 5 B 4

Score

PRIORITY

4.5

1

2.55

3

2.55

3

3.5

2

2.1

4

4.15

1

4.05

1

3.35

2

Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)

Years of Customer Life

Annual Discount Rate

Assumptions

Initial Purchase Price

Annual Product Inflation

Margin per Product

Retention Rate Year 1

Retention Rate Later Yrs.

Years between Purchase

5

15%

Item 1 Item 2 Item 3

$150.00 $ 60.00 $ 15.00

7%

25%

5%

15%

2%

10%

95%

80%

2

95%

80%

0.6

95%

80%

0.25

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Item 1

150.00

Value of

Purchase

Item 2

60.00

171.74

196.62

Net

Present

Value

Item 1

65.95

69.46

Item 2

11.45

Item 3

15.00

15.30

15.61

15.92

16.24

Item 3

4.13

Item 1

37.50

Profit per

Acquired

Customer

Item 2

9.00

32.63

23.91

6.33

Total NPV 81.53

Item 3

1.50

1.45

1.19

0.97

0.79

5

Customer 7

Life Years 10

15

5

$101.60

Discount Rate(%)

10 15 20

$90.57 $81.53 $74.03

$117.58 $102.12 $90.00 $80.33

$127.91 $108.88 $94.51 $83.39

$140.63 $116.01 $98.63 $85.83

Source: CLV Calculator- HBR http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/1436.html

Long Run Effects of Risk on Marketing Policies

Expected

Cash Flow

Expected

Cash Flow

Discount

Rate

NPV

Calculation

NPV

Low Price

Strategy

Period 1

$10M

Period 2

$14M 15% (10)/(1+0.15)+

(14)/(1+0.15) 2

$19.27M

High Price

Strategy

$6M $4M 5% (6)/(1+0.05)+

(4)/(1+0.05) 2

$9.34M

Coordinate finance & marketing functions to select appropriate discount rate, marketing policies and resource allocations after analyzing the risks and returns from different marketing policies.

Reference: Sharan Jagpal (2008) “Fusion for Profit” pp 26

EV of Entering a Test Market in Singapore Using Real Options

Expected incremental profit from test market/(1+ discount rate)

+

Probability of low demand X Cash Flow from Yr 2 on/ discount rate

X

1/(1+ discount rate)

+

Probabaility of high demand X Cash Flow from Yr 2 on/ discount rate

X

1/(1+ discount rate)

-

Probability of introducing new product X investment/(1 + discount rate)

-

Upfront cost for setting up test markets

=

Total incremental value of expected cash flows from test market strategy

$8.5M(1+0.05)

0.5x ($0/0.05)

1/(1+0.05)

0.5 x ($100/0.05)

1/(1+0.05)

(0.5X $70M)/(1+0.05)

$20M

$907M

Conditional NPV with strategic flexibility on immediate Launch

=[Expected Profit in Yr1/(1+ Discount rate)] + (probability of withdrawing product at end of Yr X conditional NPV of cash flows from Yr 2 on) +

(probability of staying in market at end of Yr 1 X conditional NPV of cash flows from Yr 2 on) - upfront inves

=

P.S: Conditional NPV of profits=Annual CF from Yr2 on/[Discount

Rate(1+Discount Rate)]

=

=85/1.1+(0.5x0)+(0.5x90

9)-70

$462M

= 100/(0.10 x [1+0.10])

$909M

Economic Value of waiting for uncertainity to be resolved =$907M-$462M

$445M

Country Managers

• Risk-averse and reluctant to handle card product

• Tie compensation to product

• Compensate for long term vision

• Local currency (Jagpal, NB chapter 23)

• 4 Component Parts of Compensation

– Base wage

– Share of NPV of after tax operating cash flow

– Share of NPV of tax shield

– Share of real options of product

• Above mix changes per country and per period!

• Australia vs. India example

NPV

Operations

NPV Tax

Shield

Australia High ($59M) High

India

Compensation - Period 1

Low ($6 M) Low

Real

Options

Compensation

Recommendation

Low

High

25% Base Salary

37.5% NPV Operations

25% NPV Tax Shield

12.5% Real Options

50% Base Salary

12.5% NPV Operations

6.25% NPV Tax Shield

31.25% Real Options

Compensation - Period 2

• Australia vs. India example

Australia

NPV

Operations

NPV Tax

Shield

High (>$59M) High

Real

Options

Compensation

Recommendation withdraw 50% Base Salary

25% NPV Operations

25% NPV Tax Shield

India Low (>$6 M) Low remain 50% Base Salary

25% NPV Operations

6.25% NPV Tax Shield

18.75% Real Options

Recommendations

• Use a staged roll out plan introducing each of three groups at 6-9 month intervals (Australia, Singapore, Taiwan first).

• Opt for a test market initially, followed by multi-country entry.

• The presence of cost and demand dynamics must be considered when formulating pricing strategy, and Citibank may choose to learn from first movers errors.

• For uncertain marketplaces, use Real Option Valuation model.

• Build centralized data processing center before entering test market.

( Citi absorbs initial $35 MM investment)

– Establish specific credit card business independent from other business units in each country

– Charge country managers usage fee based on either computational usage, dollar usage, or user (per merchant/cardholder) & continue to charge until investment recouped

– Allow country managers to set join fee

Recommendations (cont’d)

• Features of credit card program should match the brand positioning and corporate image. Include gold features for premium clients and regular/base features for others.

• In saturated markets grow through acquisition, and use green field approach in emerging countries.

• Capitalize on cross-selling and foreign currency exchange arbitrage opportunities.

• Structure flexible country manager compensation to encourage elements of shared risk and long term focus on available marketing options.

• Compensate country managers in local currency.

Questions

Download