L’OREAL Aurélien FATTORE - Pieter HOFSTRA Kenza OUAZZANI - Carsten SIEBERT 1- Value Chain and Organization 2- General data 3- Cost estimation and allocation 4- Activity-Based Costing 5- Cost-Volume-Profit Model 6- Investment analysis 1- Value chain and organization R&D Design Determined by segment Creating new formulas Supply Production Marketing Distribution Core Process Receiving Raw materials and packaging B2B & B2C 30,1% of Sales Customer service Each plant produces for its geographical area 2- General data: from the Income Statement… Consolidated Income Statement In Million € Net Sales Cost of sales Gross Profit Distribution Costs Admin. Expenses R&D Operating profit Other Inc/Expens. 2006 2005 15,790.1 -4,569.1 11,221.0 -4,783.0 -3,309.4 -532.5 2,540.9 -60.8 14,532.5 -4,347.3 10,185.2 -4,367.2 -3,009.3 -496.2 2,266.0 9.3 Product Cost Period Cost …to some examples of costs Direct Costs : Direct Labor: machine and quality control workers Direct Material: raw materials, packages Manufacturing Overhead Costs: Indirect Labor: plastic purchase manager (packaging) Indirect Material: power supply for whole plant Cost Hierarchy: Unit Level: cream Batch Level: packaging for delivery Product Level: composition of the cream Customer Level: key account managers Facility Level: building, accounting activities 3- Cost estimation and allocation • Appropriated Product-Costing Systems: Process costing: relevant for making the mixture; we consider equivalent units of mixture to evaluate the costs. Job costing: appropriated for packaging • Appropriated cost allocation: ABC: within jobs and processes, in order to get inside view of costs 4- Activity Based Costing Steps to take for Activity Based Costing 1) Identifying the major activities that take place in an organization; 2) Assigning costs to cost pools/ cost centers for each activity; 3) Determining the cost driver for each major activity. 4) Assigning the cost of activities to products according to the product’s demand for activities We used this approach for L’Oréal for a plant with two main products. All costs in the next slide are estimated. 4- Activity Based Costing (2) Activity Activity costs Activity cost driver Quantity of activity cost driver Acitivity cost driver rate Production activities Machining: activity centre X 700000000 Number of machine hours 500000000 1,4 Machining: activity centre Y 800000000 Number of machine hours 600000000 1,333333333 Mixing fluids X 4000000 Number of machine hours 2000000 2 Mixing fluids Y 5500000 Number of mixing hours 2500000 2,2 100000000 Number of purchase orders 1000000 100 Receiving raw material 60000000 Number of materal receipts 500000 120 Disburse materials 20000000 Number of production runs 300000 66,66666667 Analysing Fluids 20000000 Number of research hours 250000 80 Experimenting Fluids 15000000 Number of experimenting hours 300000 50 Number of test hours 150000 40 Number of advertisements 50000 500 Number of commercial minutes 10000 13000 Number of promotional hours 10000 1000 400000 500 2000000 35 300000 200 Materials procurement activities Purchasing raw material R&D activities Testing Fluids (before production) 6000000 Marketing activities Advertisement 25000000 Commercials 130000000 Promotion (shows, etc.) 10000000 General factory support activities Production scheduling 200000000 Number of production runs Set-up machines 70000000 Number of set-up hours Quality inspection 60000000 Number of first item inspections 5- Cost-Volume-Profit model Total revenues = 15355,1 Mil € Operating profit = 2482,6 Mil € 16000 15000 Total costs and revenues in Mil Ū 14000 Total costs = 12872,5 Mil € 13000 12000 11000 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 Administration Costs 4000 3000 Marketing & Promotion Costs Estimated Fixed Costs 2000 1000 0 Units of production and sales R & D Costs Due to very high fixed costs in the R&D, advertising and administration division the volume must be high in order to make a profit. Increasing the volume was one major reason for the increase of the operating profit by 9,6% in 2006! 6- Investment analysis & Capital budgeting decision • In 2006, L’Oréal announced it would buy « The Body Shop » company for two main strategic reasons: - strengthening the distribution network - obtaining a more ‘ethical’ image. Some days before L’Oréal made this announcement, The Body Shop published its annual results: Data available for the Capital Budgeting Decision 1£= 1,43€ The Body Shop Company Sales - Cost of Sales = Gross profit Results 2006 (before acquisition by L'Oréal) in M£ R& D Marketing and promotion Administration official detail unavailable official detail unavailable official detail unavailable Operating Profit + Depreciation + Other adjustments = Cash Flow from operations TOTAL CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS in M€ 485,8 694,69 167,3 239,24 318,5 455,46 41,5 15 1,5 58 53,8 59,35 21,45 2,15 82,94 76,93 ANY QUESTION ? 6- Investment analysis & Capital budgeting Investment analysis according to the Net Present Value Technique (M€) Assumptions Annual Cash Flow 'CF' Discount Rate 'r' Annual Growth (expected) 'g' Results Present Value in perpetuity (if the company is owned forever) Maximum amount of money L'Oreal should be willing to pay Investment actually realized to buy the shares Net Present Value > 0 76,93 10% 3% 1099 1099 940 159 Pr esentValueInPerpetuity PV CF CF(1 g) CF(1 g) 2 ... 1 r (1 r) 2 (1 r) 3 CF rg (GordonFormula) The investment is profitable. Moreover, L’Oréal wants to strengthen ‘The Body Shop’ results. What does L’Oréal expect, in addition to strategic plans ? Most competitors of ‘The Body Shop Company’ have margins twice more important. L’Oréal expects to improve the margin of ‘The Body Shop’, thanks to synergies in production (gains in the value chain), marketing and overheads. First results, one semester after L'Oréal bought 'The Body Shop Company' Sales 435 Gross profit 154,7 Cash Flow (converted into a annual value) 100 Reminding : NPV calculated with the Body Shop usual cash-flows 159,0571429 NPV calculated with Cash Flow 2006 488,57143