APUSH Presentation Activity - Term 3, 2011-12 Goal: Analyze and evaluate a historical time period/event using multiple sources Create a PowerPoint presentation based on your analysis Present your findings to the class in an engaging, 40-60 minute presentation Required elements: Marked up copy of article to prove you read the entire thing (one per member) PowerPoint presentation sent to teacher 24 hours prior to presentation In-text Citations and Works Cited (failure to Cite information will result in NO CREDIT) Research: Presentation: Content: Total Project: (25 points) Marked up copy of the article to prove it was read in its entirety – awarded individually (5 pts) In-text Citations and Footnotes on slides to show sources used (see back of sheet for explanation) (10 pts) Works Cited with all sources used (at least five); sources are credible and “AP worthy” (10 pts) (45 points) Delivery: Group members share responsibilities for speaking equally Members speak with good volume, eye contact, delivery speed (not too fast!), and enthusiasm Information is well organized and clear; transitions smooth All members demonstrate depth of knowledge (minimal use of notecards/reading off slides) Presentation is long enough to deliver content (40-60 minutes) Creativity & Activities: Variety of activities used throughout the presentation to include the class in the learning process and engage students Discussion/Activities well managed and involve all students Activities promote high-level thinking skills and analysis PowerPoint: Good balance of words and images (not too many words) Fonts are easy to read; backgrounds/pictures enhance analysis Slides are well organized and visually pleasing, contributing to the overall analysis of topic and engagement of students PowerPoint is turned in early to the teacher (5 pts) (80 points) Understanding: All members show full understanding of the assigned article/topic; each member can explain and elaborate if asked Includes substantial outside information Analysis/Argument: Group goes beyond mere recitation of facts to analyze the meaning of the evidence At the beginning of the presentation group includes 1) the question(s) analyzed during this presentation and 2) a preview slide showing how they will organize their information Engages the audience in thinking about/analyzing the evidence and how to use it in a FRQ/DBQ Historiography: Presentation includes thoughtful analysis of how historians have viewed this topic /25 pts /10 pts /20 pts /15 pts /30 pts /40 pts /10 pts /150 pts How to do footnotes and Works Cited for your Teaching Project 1. Insert a number at the end of the line of information where you have used a source like this (1) 2. Create a text box at the bottom of the screen where you include that number and the name of the author (or first entry in the works cited such as the title) & page number (or paragraph # if from internet) a. Ex. 1. Tindall, 152. 3. OR enter the number and author information in the “Notes” sections (the advantage of this is that it doesn’t take up space on your slide but is still available to teachers. Example: 4. The Works Cited should follow MLA Format: a. Only include the sources you cite directly in your project b. Alphabetical order (no numbers) c. Double spaced with second line (and beyond) indented Go to http://www.easybib.com for more information. Teaching Project Topics and Questions for Term 3: Topic: Date: Short Description of topic: Questions this project will answer: Mon 1. Did the New Deal Prolong the 2/6 Great Depression?1 In the wake of the Great Depression FDR saw a wave of new and innovative legislation meant to relieve the suffering of the American people, help the economy to recover from the worst downturn in American history, and reform the economic system to make sure that we never had such a crisis again. But some historians and modern politicians argue that its anti-market program actually made the depression worse rather than better. Which is more accurate? Did the New Deal prolong the Great Depression? How have historians analyzed the New Deal and Great Depression? How/why have these views changed? Wed 2. Should the 2/15 U.S. have dropped the Atomic Bombs?2 The United States dropped two atomic bombs on Japanese cities in August of 1945. Shortly afterwards, Japan surrendered to great joy in the United States. While almost all Americans (had they known) would have approved the choice at the time, it has been debated more since. Should the US have dropped the bomb? Should the United States have dropped the atomic bombs? What factors/alternatives should have been considered when the US made this decision? How have historians analyzed the decision to drop the atomic bombs? How/why have these views changed? Fri 2/17 Just as WWII drew to a close, another was about to begin. The Cold War began from a combination of factors, but what were they exactly? Did it start because of rapid communist expansion? Was it a result of United States’ imperialism? Whose fault was the Cold War? Whose fault was the Cold War? How have historians analyzed the start of the Cold War? How/why have these views changed? As many men went off to war, WWII saw a surge in women working outside the home. Women were celebrated as “Rosie the Riveters” and encouraged by both society and government to do their part. But one the war ended women were expected to return home. By the 1950s “Rosie” was replaced by the image of the happy homemaker (like in the I love Lucy show). How and why did we see such a dramatic shift? What changed for women between the 1940s and 1950s and why? How did we get from “Rosie” to “Lucy”? How have historians analyzed the impact of WWII on gender roles of mid-century? How/why have these views changed? 3. Whose fault was the Cold War (US vs USSR)?3 4. From Rosie to Thurs 2/23 Lucy4 5. Were the 1950s Happy Days?2 Mon 2/27 Many of us still base out understandings of the 1950s on the iconic image of perfection presented by sitcom television. But how happy were the 1950s? Who was included in the postwar affluence and who was left out? Were the 1950s happy days? How have historians analyzed the political, economic, and social conditions of the 1950s? How/why have these views changed? 6. Did JFK demonstrate a strong commitment to Civil Rights?1 Wed 3/2 While he did not live to see them, many see the monumental Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as the products of a strong push for civil rights under JFK. But others see JFK as far too hesitant and deferent to racist Southern Democrats. Did JFK actually leave us a strong legacy of Civil Rights or not? To what extent did JFK (and his legacy) demonstrate a strong commitment to Civil Rights? How have historians analyzed the civil rights policies of JFK? How/why have these views changed? The Vietnam war was as controversial at the time as it remains today. One element of the war that is still debated is the effectiveness of the anti-war protest movement. Did it sway politicians to its perspective and hence shorten the war or did it instead bring comfort to the enemy and harden the resolve of the war’s supporters? To what extent did the antiwar movement prolong the war in Vietnam? Was the protest movement effective in creating political change? How have historians analyzed the antiwar movement? How/why have these views changed? The end of the Cold War and the implosion of the former Soviet Union was a truly historic occasion. But who deserves credit? Should US President Ronald Reagan get credit for his carrot & stick approach, assistance to opposition groups in places like Poland, and military buildup? Or should more credit go to Soviet leaders like Gorbachev for their openness and willingness to change? Or should the greater credit go to the subversive appeal of American culture and the American way of life? To what extent was Reagan responsible for the end of the Cold War? How have historians analyzed Reagan’s foreign policy and the end of the Cold War? How/why have these views changed? Fri 7. Did the 3/9 antiwar movement prolong the war in Vietnam?2 8. Did Reagan Win the Cold War?2 1 Thurs 3/15 Madaras, Larry, and James M. SoRelle. Taking Sides. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2011. Madaras, Larry, and James M. SoRelle. Taking Sides. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1997. 3 Couvares, Francis G. Interpretations of American History: Patterns and Perspectives. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martins, 2009. 4 Davidson, James West., and Mark H. Lytle. After the Fact: the Art of Historical Detection. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2010. 2