Assessment of Example 4: A Perfectly Lovely Time; by Robin Klein “Jasper and Roderick peered through the azalea shrubbery at the terrace, where their treacherous mother was pouring tea for the minister’s wife. They didn’t really mind the minister’s wife, who was as kindly and innocuous as a cow browsing in a river meadow. You could get away with a smile, a quick ‘Good afternoon, Mrs. Robey’, a secret snatch at a raisin scone, another smile, and then melt safely back into the garden. She would just gaze at you indulgently and say things like ‘Boys will be boys, especially twins’. But today was different. Today, by their mother’s invitation, Mrs. Robey had brought her small grand-daughter, aged nine. Criteria A: Imagination Unique Original Can be fantasy or Real 0- The writings idea is copied from another piece and shows no originality whatsoever. 1- The piece shows some creativity and originality within the ideas. 2- The piece is adequately creative and original, but could be improved. 3- The piece shows a lot of creativity and originality and needs some improvement. 4- The piece is entirely creative and original and only needs one or two or no minute changes to be made. This excerpt from the story demonstrates the creativity that was put into this story and in my opinion it needs no improvements to be made, so I give it a four for criterion a. Criterion B: Grammar Must include clauses Spelling must be accurate Numbers must be written correctly Proper use of articles Sentence structure Subject and verb agreement 0- The piece has no clauses and/or sentence structure. It doesn’t have a proper use of articles and subject and verb agreement. Finally the piece has many spelling mistakes and all the numbers are not written properly. 1- 1- The piece has some clauses and/or sentence structure. It has some proper use of articles and subject and verb agreement. Finally the piece has quite a lot of spelling mistakes and the most of the numbers are not written properly. 0- 2- The piece has quite a bit of clauses and sentence structure but only about half of it actually does. It uses quite a bit of proper use of articles and subject and verb agreement. Finally the piece has many spelling mistakes and half of the numbers are written properly. 10- 3- The piece has quite a lot of clauses and sentence structure. It has a proper use of articles and subject and verb agreement most of the time. Finally the piece barely has any spelling mistakes and the numbers are written properly. 4- The piece uses clauses and proper sentence structure correctly. It has a proper use of articles and subject and verb agreement all the time. Finally the piece has no spelling mistakes at all and all the numbers are all written properly. The piece uses clauses, sentence structure, articles and subject and verb agreement properly all the time throughout the short story. The piece also doesn’t have any spelling mistakes with words or numbers. Criterion C: Language Advanced Adjectives Grammar Syntax 0- 0- The piece shows no advanced adjectives, grammar or syntax at all. 0- 1- The piece shows a limited range of advanced adjectives and limited grammar and syntax use. 0- 2- The piece shows a satisfactory range of advanced adjectives and satisfactory grammar and syntax use. 0- 3- The piece shows a great range of advanced adjectives and great grammar and syntax use. 0- 4- The piece shows an excellent range of advanced adjectives and excellent grammar and syntax use. The piece has only one or two advanced adjectives depending on how you look at them: “Jasper and Roderick peered through the azalea shrubbery at the terrace, where their treacherous mother was pouring tea for the minister’s wife. They didn’t really mind the minister’s wife, who was as kindly and innocuous as a cow browsing in a river meadow.” But it makes up for that with its excellent grammar and syntax use. In the end I give the piece a two because even though the average is like a 2.5 I still think the adjectives are more important because they are what keeps the reader excited.