Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 14 December 2011 HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 2011 http://darp.lse.ac.uk/HMRC-HMT 9.2 Income distribution, taxation and redistribution Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Overview... Income distribution, taxation, redistribution Income distribution Use US data as a working template Inequality trends Inequality internationally Redistribution 2 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation What is income? (1) Current Population Survey (DeNavas-Walt et al. 2005, 2008) 1. Earnings 2. Unemployment compensation 3. Workers’ compensation 4. Social security 5. Supplemental security income 6. Public assistance 7. Veterans’ payments 8. Survivor benefits 9. Disability benefits 10. Pension or retirement income 11. Interest 12. Dividends 13. Rents, royalties, estates & trusts 14. Educational assistance 15. Alimony 16. Child support 17. Financial assistance from outside the household 18. Other income 3 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation What is income? (2) Covers money income received Before deductions personal income taxes social security, union dues Medicare deductions Does not include noncash benefits exclusive of certain money receipts such as capital gains food stamps health benefits subsidized housing goods produced and consumed on the farm business transportation and facilities, payments by business for retirement programs. Examine CPS distributional data… 4 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Quantile Incomes by Households 1974 2004 Growth 10% $9,741 $10,927 12.2% 20% $16,285 $18,500 13.6% 50% $37,519 $44,389 18.3% 80% $64,781 $88,029 35.9% 90% $83,532 $120,924 44.8% 95% $102,534 $157,185 53.3% DeNavas-Walt et al (2005) Table A-3 More detail. 5 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Quantiles: 1967 – 2004 $180,000 q.10 q.20 q.50 q.80 q.90 q.95 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 6 $180,000 $160,000 $140,000 $120,000 1974 income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation The Parade: quantiles vs population 2004 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 proportion of population 0.8 1 7 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Quantile ratios: US 1967 – 2004 4.00 q.95/q.50 q.90/q.50 q.80/q.50 q.20/q.50 q.10/q.50 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 8 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Overview... Income distribution, taxation, redistribution Income distribution Developments in the USA and UK Inequality trends Inequality internationally Redistribution 9 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Mean incomes by groups of households 1974 2004 Growth 1st 20% $9,324 $10,264 10.1% 2nd 20% $23,176 $26,241 13.2% 3rd 20% $37,353 $44,455 19.0% 4th 20% $53,944 $70,085 29.9% 5th 20% $95,576 $151,593 58.6% Overall $43,875 $60,528 38.0% More detail 10 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Differential growth of mean incomes Me an Income s US $160,000 $140,000 Lowest 20% Second 20% Third 20% Fourth 20% Highest 20% $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 11 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 1974 $40,000 2004 income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 1: The Generalised Lorenz Curve $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 proportion of population 1 12 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 2: Income shares: US 1967-2004 60 50 s1 s2 40 s3 s4 30 s5 20 10 0 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 13 50 45 P90–100 40 35 30 P99–100 CG excl 25 20 15 P99–100 CG Incl 10 5 Source: Piketty and Saez (2003) 1997 1993 1989 1985 1981 1977 1973 1969 1965 1961 1957 1953 1949 1945 1941 1937 1933 1929 1925 1921 1917 0 1913 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 2: Top income shares in US 14 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Top income shares in the UK Source: Atkinson, (2004) 15 1 1974 0.8 2004 0.6 Equality proportion of income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 3: Lorenz curve Natural interpretation in terms of shares Gives a natural definition of the Gini coefficient 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 proportion of population 16 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation UK “Original income” – GLC £35,000 £30,000 £25,000 £20,000 1992 1998/99 2005/6 £15,000 £10,000 £5,000 £0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Proportion of population Note: in December 2005 prices 17 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation UK “Final income” – GLC £35,000 £30,000 £25,000 £20,000 1992 1998/99 2005/6 £15,000 £10,000 £5,000 £0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Proportion of population Note: in December 2005 prices 18 1.0 0.9 Equality 1992 1998/99 2006/7 0.8 0.7 Proportion of Income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation UK “Original income” – Lorenz 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Proportion of population 0.8 0.9 1.0 19 1.0 0.9 Equality 1992 1998/99 2006/7 0.8 0.7 Proportion of Income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation UK “Final income” – Lorenz 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Proportion of population 0.8 0.9 1.0 20 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Gini GE0 GE1 A.25 A.50 A.75 0 19 67 19 70 19 73 19 76 19 79 19 82 19 85 19 88 19 91 19 94 19 97 20 00 20 03 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Example 1: Inequality measures and US experience Source: DeNavas-Walt et al. (2005) 21 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Overview... Income distribution, taxation, redistribution Income distribution Comparisons across countries? Convergence? Inequality trends Inequality internationally Redistribution 22 1.0 Sweden 2000 inc 25 India 1999–00 exp 32.5 0.9 United States 2000 inc 40.8 0.8 United Kingdom 1999 inc 36 China 2001 exp 44.7 0.7 Russia 2000 exp 45.6 Brazil 1998 inc 59.1 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 Proportion of Income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Lorenz around the world… 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Proportion of population 0.8 0.9 1.0 23 Source World Bank (2004) Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Income or consumption? Albania Bulgaria Bangladesh Vietnam Nepal Morocco Nicaragua Thailand Peru Panama Russia Brazil Year 1996 1995 2000 1998 1996 1998 1998 2000 1994 1997 1997 1996 See World Bank (2005), page 38 Gini coefficient Consumption Income 0.252 0.392 0.274 0.392 0.334 0.392 0.362 0.489 0.366 0.513 0.390 0.586 0.417 0.534 0.428 0.523 0.446 0.523 0.468 0.621 0.474 0.478 0.497 0.596 24 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Example 2: International trends Source: OECD (2011) 25 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Example 2: International trends (2) Break down overall inequality to analyse trends: I = Sj wj Ij + Ibetween can we do this with any inequality measure I? what weights should we use? Traditional approach takes each country as separate unit shows divergence – increase in inequality but, in effect, weights countries equally debatable that China gets the same weight as very small countries New conventional view (Sala-i-Martin 2006) within-country disparities have increased not enough to offset reduction in cross-country disparities. Components of change in distribution are important “correctly” compute world income distribution decomposition within/between countries is then crucial what drives cross-country reductions in inequality? Large growth rate of the incomes of the 1.2 billion Chinese 26 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Source: Sala-i-Martin (2006) 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 Gini GE0 GE1 A.50 A1.0 1970 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Inequality measures and World experience 27 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 GE0 GE0 betw GE0 within GE1 GE1 betw GE1 within 19 70 19 73 19 76 19 79 19 82 19 85 19 88 19 91 19 94 19 97 20 00 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Inequality measures and World experience: breakdown Source: Sala-i-Martin (2006) 28 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Overview... Income distribution, taxation, redistribution Income distribution Impact of taxes and benefits Inequality trends Inequality internationally Redistribution 29 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Another application of ranking Tax and benefit system maps one distribution into another Use ranking tools to assess the impact of this in welfare terms Typically this uses one or other concept of Lorenz dominance Linked to effective tax progression c = y T(y) y: pre-tax income c: post-tax income T is progressive if c Lorenz-dominates y see Jakobsson (1976) , Lambert (2001) What distributional ranking would we expect to apply to these 5 concepts? original income + cash benefits gross income - direct taxes disposable income - indirect taxes post-tax income + non-cash benefits final income 30 1.0 + cash benefits (Equality Line) Original Income Gross Income Disposable Income After Tax Income Final Income 0.9 direct taxes 0.8 indirect taxes 0.7 + noncash benefits Proportion of Income Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 0.0 Impact of Taxes and Benefits. UK 2006/7. Lorenz Curve 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Big effect from benefits side Modest impact of taxes Direct and indirect taxes work in opposite directions 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Proportion of population 0.8 0.9 1.0 31 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation 0.0 Impact of Taxes and Benefits. UK 2006/7. GLC £40,000 + cash benefits Original Income Gross income Disposable income Post-tax income Final income £35,000 £30,000 direct taxes indirect taxes + noncash benefits £25,000 £20,000 £15,000 £10,000 Final income does not secondorder dominate original income £5,000 £0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Proportion of population 0.8 0.9 1.0 32 0.4 direct 1992 1998/9 2006/7 indirect 1992 1998/9 2006/7 0.3 0.2 0.1 10 th h p 9t h 8t h 7t h 6t h 5t h 4t 3r d 2n d To to m 10 t h 0 Bo t Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Implied tax rates in Economic and Labour Market Review Formerly Economic Trends. Taxes as proportion of gross income – see Jones, (2008) 33 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation Summary 2nd-order (GL)-dominance: ranking by cumulations Lorenz dominance equivalent to ranking by shares From lecture 1 Special case of GL-dominance normalised by means use to characterise redistributional impact If Lorenz-curves intersect unambiguous inequality orderings not possible Makes inequality measures especially interesting Use I-measures to capture effective tax progression 34 Frank Cowell: HMRC-HMT Economics of Taxation References * Atkinson, A. B. (2004) “Income tax and top incomes over the twentieth century,” Hacienda Pública Española, 168, 123-141 DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D. and Lee, C. H. (2005) “Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004.” Current Population Reports P60-229, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D. and Lee, C. H. (2008) “Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007.” Current Population Reports P60-235, U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. Jakobsson, U. (1976) “On the measurement of the degree of progression,” Journal of Public Economics, 5, 161-168. * Jones, F. (2008) “The effects of taxes and benefits on household income, 2006/07,” Economic and Labour Market Review, 2, 37-47. Lambert, P. J. (2001) The Distribution and Redistribution of Income (Third ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. OECD (2011) Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising OECD iLibrary. Piketty, T. and E. Saez (2003) “Income inequality in the United States, 1913-1998,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1-39. Sala-i-Martin, X. (2006) “The world distribution of income: Falling poverty and ... convergence, period”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 The World Bank (2004) 2005 World Development Report: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone. Oxford University Press, New York The World Bank (2005) 2006 World Development Report: Equity and Development. Oxford University Press, New York 35