Student Services Program Planning Annual Update
Department Accessibility Support Center
Date: Spring 2015
Goals and Recommendations from Program Plan
List the top five goals and recommendations from the last Program Plan and indicate whether they have been met
Goals / Recommendations from six-year plan
Restore a full-time counseling position
Restore 50/50 director/counselor to FT
director
Restore 2 summer months to test proctor
position
Restore IA position to ADPE from 10 to 11
months
Restore SDLC counselor by 12.5%
Revised October 22, 2012
In
progress (in
clude
projected
timeline)
By Fall
2015
Source of
funding
Comments (include any modifications to goals due to
feedback, discussion and/or evaluation – refer to data
when possible)
Yearly
Apportionment
By Fall
2016
Yearly
Apportionment
To meet the needs of a high-touch population with
counseling, adapted student planning workshops,
instruction, and other 3SP required services. Provide
accommodations, interact with and educate campus
personnel about changing student population groups on
campus
3SP requirements, Student Equity, and AB86
opportunities require ASC to develop expanded services
and instruction for students requiring educational
support. A FT director will be able to focus on designing
and developing services, campus partnerships, and
classes for student success as well as apply for funded
partnerships with community resources.
Same as in program plan
XX
XX
By Fall
2015
Yearly
Apportionment
Yearly
Apportionment
Yearly
Apportionment
Same as in program plan
Same as in program plan
Goal
Met
XX
XX
New Goals and Recommendations Since Last Program Plan
List any new goals and recommendations identified by the department
Goal/Recommendation (include timeline)
Develop new services and classes for ASD
population starting in spring 16
Develop universal referral protocol between
service providers: EOPS, FYI, ASC, Fast Track
(new name), and Veterans to ensure best
practices for linking campus resources to
targeted student groups
Cost
Apportionment
funding
None
Explanation/Evidence of Need
(indicate how this need was
assessed)
Numbers of these students are
increasing. Population seeking ASC
support has grown from under 10 to
over 70 since 2012.
Students require more time and
intervention than other populations
and are, in general, successful given
appropriate accommodations,
instructor/staff education,
intervention, and behavioral
guidelines.
A number of students benefit from
multiple campus resources
providing specialized services.
Student reports indicate a lack of
knowledge or understanding of how
to access other services.
Status (Comment on progress of
new goals/recommendations listed
in last annual update)
The 2014 Program Plan addresses
the need to develop pathways to
college success for this group.
New data from CO indicates a
growing impact on community
colleges by influx of ASD
population resulting from
mainstreaming students in the K12 system.
Service providers have begun
meeting to develop better links to
student support and create a
universal referral protocol
SSLO/AUO Assessment Progress
In a sentence or two, describe where your department should be with ongoing assessment (what assessment you should have done in the last
year) and what was actually done. If any task was not completed, explain why.
The department continues to provide information, support, and direction so students can make best use of accommodations and campus
resources, advocate for themselves in classes, and reach their educational goals.
Revised October 22, 2012
Fill out the Assessment Results section below.
SSLO/AUO Assessment Results
List SSLO/AUO assessments, dialogues, and priorities identified as a result of your assessment below.
Attach Departmental Assessment Analysis Forms completed in the last two semesters.
Core Competency, Program
SSLO/AUO Assessed
Revised October 22, 2012
Date of meeting where
analysis / dialogue took
place. Example: Department
Meeting on 00/00/2012
Priorities identified for program as a result of assessment.