March 24, 2010 4pm – 5:30pm

advertisement
University Studies Advisory Committee: Minutes
March 24, 2010
4pm – 5:30pm
Attendance: Boomershine, Cilano, Cox, Fort, Gurganus, Moore, Orton, Sawrey, Siefert, Taylor
Issues:
• How does the committee know which courses are ready to be rescored?
o Kim: the committee leaders can let the committee know they are ready
o Danette could highlight the resubmissions that are ready to be scored
o Danette could sort the proposals by submission status
•
If a subcommittee wants a submission to be revised, do they send it directly or does it go to the
chair? Who then reviews the resubmission?
o Kim: the subcommittee leader can send back to department and notify Kim
o Kim: the entire committee will review resubmissions
o Mark: the entire committee should vote on all courses, with subcommittees doing the
initial review; if a course has all 3s or 4s, then the entire committee will pass it, if not,
the entire committee will review/vote on it
o resolution: subcommittees will review and score, entire committee will vote on all
submissions
•
Subcommittee status:
o Kim has divided us in subcommittees by alphabetical order – will email them out to us
o subcommittees won’t be meeting, just scoring ½ of the submissions to cut down on # of
proposals to score
•
Survey:
o Linda will add the submission number to the survey so she can sort by submission
number so they will be in the proper order for discussion
•
Are ‘common requirements’ courses allowed to be only for majors?
o Yes.
Course Submission Updates:
• have been resubmitted (please review): PAR 230, PAR 232, ENG 212, BIO 170 (Kim will indicate
how to know which ones are ready)
Course Submission Review:
• #5: CRW 203: AIL: passed
•
#6: CRW 203: WI: passed
1
•
#21: BIO 202: SANW: passed
•
#22: BIOL 345: WI: passed pending revisions
o rewrite global SLO #3 (from syllabus) to include something about ‘research’ and
‘evaluate’
o include discipline-specific information in the revised SLOs
o include revised bulleted SLOs from syllabus on form
o SLOs need to be reworded as outcomes instead of objectives
•
#23: BIO 495: CC: passed pending revision
o include ‘integration’ or ‘synthesis’ as an intro sentence to the SLO section
•
#24: BIO 495: IL: passed
•
#25: SPN 120: FL: void number; already approved see #14
•
#31: CRW 201: already approved
•
#32: FRH 215: already approved
•
#33: FRH 101: FL: approved
•
#34: FRH 102: FL: approved
•
#35: FRH 115: FL: approved
•
#36: FRH 120: FL: approved
•
#37: PAR 115: HPA: returned for revisions (see score sheet comments)
•
#38: PAR 215: HPA: returned for revisions (see score sheet comments)
•
#39: CHI 101: FL: returned for revisions
o revise syllabus (see score sheet comments)
o SLOs need to match on syllabus and form
•
#40: CHI 102: FL: returned for revisions
o revise syllabus (see score sheet comments)
o SLOs need to match on syllabus and form
2
Download