Department of the Air Force
Military Construction and Family
Housing Program
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2000
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
President’s Budget
Page Number
General
Table of Contents ................................................................
1
Program Summary ..............................................................
3
Militarv Construction
State Summary (List of Projects) .......................................
5
New Mission/Current Mission Exhibit ..............................
13
Installation Index ................................................................
21
Special Program Considerations:
Statements .........................................................................
23
Congressional Reporting Requirements ........................
24
Research and Development .............................................
26
Third Party Financing .....................................................
27
Appropriation Language ....................................................
29
Inside the United States Construction Projects.. ..............
31
Outside the United States Construction Projects.. ...........
231
Unspecified Minor Construction .......................................
259
Planning and Design ...........................................................
261
Working Capital Funds Construction Projects.. ..............
263
1
Inside the United States Construction Projects
11.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
(computer qenerated)
14.
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATE
12.
I
DATA
TITLE
I
I
(WRIGHT-PATTERSON
AIR
PROGRAM
ELEMENT16.
15.
FORCE BASE,
OHIO
CATEGORY
CODEI7.
I
I
ZHTV033201
113-321
7.28.96
(REPLACE
WEST RAMP, PHASE I
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
COST($OOO)
I
9. COST
IREPLACE
WEST RAMP,
WEST RAMP APRONS
PAVED SHOULDER
LIQUID
FUEL PIPELINES
ISUBTOTAL
ITOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
(TOTAL
REQUEST
[TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
22,600
ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
PHASE
t UNIT
I
IU/M[QUANTITY~
ILS I
I SM 197,117
I
46,071
1SM
I
AND OVERHEAD
(5.7%)
COST
I
1
1
I
ILS
& PITS
1
I
I
t
I
(
COST
($0001
21,497
1
I
(
881
381
(17,346)
( 1,751)
1 ( 2,400)
1 21,497
21,497
1,225
22,722
22,600
I
I
1
L
I
110.
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Remove and replace
existing
Iconcrete
pavement and base at the West ramp parking
Aaron,
and adjacent
lpaved shoulders,
replace
hydrant
fueling
system,
fuel pits,
and
Iunderground
utilities.
Include
the necessary
demolition,
cleanup,
Imarkinq,
liqhtinq,
and all necessary
support.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
(PROJECT:
Replace west ramp, phase I. (Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
Replacement
of the existing
concrete
pavement and base at
lthe west ramp parking
apron,
adjacent
shoulders,
hydrant
fuel system,
/underground
utilities,
and lighting
is required.
An increase
in grade of
Igross slope of the ramp is required
to improve the existing
drainage
Isystem and to keep the subsurface
water away from the slabs.
The Air
/Force Civil
Engineering
Support
Agency's
(AFCESA) pavement evaluation
Ireport
prepared
in 1998 recommended reconstruction
of the west ramp, and
[adjacent
taxiways.
The west ramp pavement's
condition
was rated poor,
and
Jthe adjacent
taxiways
pavement's
condition
was rated poor and very poor.
(These areas are highly
utilized
by the 445th Airlift
Wing's C-141B
laircraft
which fly approximately
1,100 sorties
annually.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
The west ramp and taxiway
pavements
that lead in and
lout of the west ramp were constructed
in 1959.
Numerous repair
projects
(on the taxiways
over the last
30 years have repaired
durability
cracked
areas,
replaced
random slabs,
and replaced
joint
sealants.
The most
common deterioration
of the taxiways
are longitudinal
cracks,
durability
[cracking,
spalling,
and patching.
The west ramp apron areas are in
Isimilar
condition
to the taxiways
and the deterioration
is identical.
IExtensive
patchwork
has been completed
to maintain
these old pavements on
/the West Ramp. Unfortunately,
durability
crackinq
continues
to occur in
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page No 176
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
IWRIGHT-PATTERSON
14. PROJECT TITLE
AIR
FORCE BASE,
PROJECT
DATA
WEST RAMP,
DATE
I
I
I
OHIO
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
I
IREPLACE
12.
I
I
ZHTV033201
PHASE I
I
Some areas
show initial
stages
pavement
and in some patches.
Iht e original
Iof durability
cracking,
and others
show durability
cracking
in its
later
[stages.
The cracks
have laced
together
and begun to break
apart
and
Ispall.
A considerable
amount of foreign
object
damage
(FOD) is generated
Iby these
distresses
which
causes
operational
problems.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Maintenance
and repair
cost
will
continue
to
Iescalate.
Each repair
project
puts
severe
restrictions
on the aircraft
Imission
during
construction.
Mission
accomplishment
will
be hampered
by
Ithe
inadequate,
and poor
condition
of these
airfield
pavements.
In
Iaddition,
there
is a higher
risk
to aircraft
and personnel
due to the
[relatively
higher
level
of FOD associated
with
repaired
pavements
versus
Ireplaced
pavements.
If these
situation
continues,
it could
result
in
(serious
and irreparable
consequences.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
as specified
in Air
[Force
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements".
Base Civil
Engineer:
Co1
IJeffery
Charles
(937)
257-6214.
Replace
West Ramp, Phase
I: 197,117
SM =
12,121,OOO
SF; 46,071
SM = 49,500
SF
I
I
1
/
I
1
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
1
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
177
11.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
PROJECT
I
DATA
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
IWRIGHT-PATTERSON
14. PROJECT TITLE
AIR
FORCE
BASE,
OHIO
15.
I
I
IREPLACE
DATE
12.
WEST
RAMP,
PHASE
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
I
ZHTV033201
I
112.
SUPPLEMENTAL
I
/
DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
a(1)
(2)
lother
to be accomplished
by design-build
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
Where Design Was Most
(b)
Design
Recently
procedures
-
NO
Used -
N/A
1130
Design Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
00 DEC
01
APR
(5)
Construction
02
OCT
(6)
Energy
(3)
(3a)
(4)
lb-
Project
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
are
y
be performed
be provided
obsolete.
I
from
Page
No
178
12. DATE
Il. COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
15. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION
IAIR FORCE
I
I COST INDEX]
~MATERIEL COMMAND
0.86
ITINKER AIR FORCE BASE, 0KwIoMA
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
(6. PERSONNEL
I
I
1 OFF! ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL [CIVl
OFF1 ENL ]CIVj
TOTAL
STRENGTH
1
1
1
1 85116201
21,335
a. As of 30 SEP 99
110811 50761137071
(10971
50451142571
( 851(6201
21,870
b. End FY 2005
I
I
I
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
4,886)
la. Total Acreage:
8,338,950
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
IC*
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
18,180
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
17,300
le. Authorization
45,300
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
(g. Remaining
Deficiency:
124,100
Ih. Grand Total:
8,543,830
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~
~START
-CMPL
I1211-159
DEPOT CORROSION CONTROL STRIP
5,065
SM 12,380
TURN KEY
FACILITY(WORKING
CAPITAL FUND)
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
TURN KEY
96 RM
5,800
TOTAL:
18,180
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
(217-742
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
2,800
SM
8,700
SQUADRON OPERATIONS COMPLEX
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
8,600
TOTAL:
17,300
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1141-764
ADD TO INTEGRATION
SUPPORT
2,726
SM
6,300
FACILITY
I
1141-764
SOFTWARE SUPPORT FACILITY
6,690
SM 12,600
(211-254
ALTER DEPOT PLATING SHOP
LS
9,600
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
9,300
1721-312
DORMITORY
120 RM
7,500
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Oklahoma
City
Air Logistics
Center
which
1
lis responsible
for logistics
management,
support,
and depot-level
I
/maintenance,
repair
and overhaul
of B-l,
B-2,
B-52,
KC-135,
and E-3
laircraft
and aircraft
engines;
an air
base wing;
an Air
Combat Command Air
I
[Control
Wing with
four
E-3 airborne
air
control
squadrons
supporting
24
IE-3 aircraft;
an AFRES wing with
one KC-135
squadron,
an ACC
ICommunications
Group;
and an Engineering
Installations
Wing.
A major
Itenant
is the US Navy Strategic
Command (TACAMO) Winq with
E-6 aircraft.
(11.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
5,800,OOO
3,124,OOO
z:
and
health:
Backlog
0
0
This
Installation
59,288
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
179
12. DATE
(1. COMPONENT1
I
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
.
\AIR FORCE
PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
14.
IDEPOT CORROSION CONTROL STRIP
I
I
(FACILITY(W~RKING
cAPITu
FUND)
ITINKER
AIR FORCE BASE, 0KwIom
15. PROGRAM ELEMENTl6.
CATEGORY CODE\7. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)(
I
:
211-159
I
I
WWYK983156
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
IU/M~QUANTITY~
IDEPOT CORROSION CONTROL STRIP FACILITY
ISM I 5,065
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
I
I
UTILITIES
ILS I
PAVEMENT
LS I
SPECIAL FOUNDATION
(DRILLED PIERS)
LS I
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LS I
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS
(NON-ADD)
7.28.96
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
concrete
slab on pier
and grade beam, steel
fire
wall,
fire
suppression
system,
and all
Air Conditioning:
35 KW.
10.
12,380
1 UNIT
COST
1 2,000
COST
1
10,130
1,530
680)
(
400)
(
200)
(
250)
(
11,660
11,660
665
12,325
12,380
(11,400)
I
I
I
1
One-bay
structure
with
frame,
masonry
walls,
roof,
other
necessary
support.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
29,622
SM ADEQUATE:
24,557
SM SUBSTANDARD:
3,885 SM
IPROJECT:
Construct
a depot corrosion
control
strip
facility.
(Current
IMission)
[REQUIREMENT:
An environmentally
safe paint
stripping
facility
is required
(to perform
corrosion
control
for all presently
assigned
aircraft
(B-l,
IB-52,
KC-135,
E-3 etc.).
The facility
must incorporate
the most modern
lpaint
stripping
technologies
and reduce
the use of volatile
organic
lcomponds
(V0C.s) as stripping
agents.
JCURRENT SITUATION:
Implementation
of the Clean Air Act Amendment
of 1990
land the National
Emission
Standards
for Hazardous
Air Pollutants
(NESHAP)
[of 1998, requires
significant
reduction
in VOC emissions
from paint
Istripping.
Plans are underway
to reduce
the VOC emissions
with a new
Imanual
dry media blast
technology.
The existing
facilities
are not large
Ienough
to accommodate
E-3 and B-52 aircraft
utilizing
the new dry blast
/system.
Currently
E-3 aircraft
are stripped
in an existing
paint
bay
Ireducing
the capacity
needed to support
painting
of the assigned
aircraft.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
A shortfall
in depot aircraft
strip
capabilities
[will
exist
at Tinker
AFB.
Critical
depot aircraft
corrosion
control
will
Ibe deferred
or contracted
to an outside
source
at greater
expense.
The
(new strip
technology
must be incorporated
into
the corrosion
control
Iprocess
to ensure
compliance
with the NESHAP and continue
to meet customer
needs.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
I
($000)
are
obsolete.
Paw
No
:
I
I
180
Il.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
FORCE
INSTALLATION
12.
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATA
generated)
DATE
I
AND LOCATION
I
ITINKER
AIR FORCE BASE,
OKLAHOMA
14. PROJECT TITLE
IDEPOT CORROSION
CONTROL STRIP
FACILITY(WORKING
I
CAPITAL
ImTND)
15.
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
WWYK983156
I
1
I
needs.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
[Handbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
An economic analysis
has been
[prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
revitalization,
Ileasing,
contracting
and status
quo alternatives.
Based on the net
[present
values
and benefits
of respective
alternatives,
new construction
[was found to be the most cost efficient
over the life
of the project.
The
Irequirement
for this project
was validated
by the Joint
Service
Depot
IMaintenance
Industrial
Military
Construction
Review on 20 May 98.
Base
ICivil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 Mohsen Parhizkar,
(405) 734-3451.
Depot Corrosion
[Control
Strip
Facility:
5065SM = 54,500SF.
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No
181
11.
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
I
DATA
I
ITINKER
AIR FORCE BASE, 0KwIoMA
14. PROJECT TITLE
IDEPOT CORROSION CONTROL STRIP FACILITY(WORKING
IW)
I
112.
15.
I
CAPITAL
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
WWYK983156
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
I
Estimated
Design
Data:
/ a(1)
(2)
lother
to be accomplished
Basis :
Standard
or Definitive
(a)
(b)
Where Design Was Most
[INITIAL
Design
Recently
procedures
NO
N/A
Used -
619
00 DEC
01 MAY
(5)
Construction
02 NOV
(6)
Energy
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment associated
appropriations:
I
by design-build
Design Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(3)
(3a)
(4)
lb-
Project
with
EQUIPMENT
NOMENCLATURE
OUTFITTING EQUIPMENT
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
DMAG
Previous
editions
Y
be performed
be provided
from
FISCAL
YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
FY2001
are obsolete.
COST
1
($000)
I
11400
I
Page No
182
11. COMPONENT!
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
(2.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
PROGRAM
DATE
I
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
[AIR FORCE
I COST INDEX1
I
0.86
ITINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA
MATERIEL
COMMAND
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1
SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
( OFF\ ENL ( CIV
OFFI ENL (CIVI
OFFI ENL lCIV\
TOTAL
I
85116201
21,3351
As
of
30
SEP
99
110811
50761137071
laI
III
1 85116201
21,8701
lb. End FY 2005
110971 50451142571
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
4,886)
Total
Acreage:
(
Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
8,338,950
0
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
18,180
Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
(FY 2002)
17,300
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
45,300
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
Remaining
Deficiency:
124,100
Ih. Grand Total:
8,543,830
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
DESIGN STATUS
ICATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~START
-CMPL
/TURN KEY
1211-159
DEPOT CORROSION CONTROL STRIP
5,065
SM 12,380
FACILITY(WORKING
CAPITAL FUND)
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
96 RM
5,800
TURN KEY
TOTAL :
18,180
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
(217-742
COMBAT COMMUNICATIONS
2,800
SM
8,700
SQUADRON OPERATIONS COMPLEX
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
8,600
TOTAL
:
17,300
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
6,300
1141-764
ADD TO INTEGRATION
SUPPORT
2,726
SM
FACILITY
I
(141-764
SOFTWARE SUPPORT FACILITY
6,690
SM 12,600
1211-254
ALTER DEPOT PLATING SHOP
LS
9,600
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
9,300
1721-312
DORMITORY
120 RM
7,500
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Oklahoma
City
Air Logistics
Center
which
lis responsible
for logistics
management,
support,
and depot-level
Imaintenance,
repair
and overhaul
of B-l,
B-2,
B-52,
KC-135,
and E-3
(aircraft
and aircraft
engines;
an air base wing;
an Air Combat Command Air
[Control
Wing with
four
E-3 airborne
air
control
squadrons
supporting
24
IE-3 aircraft;
an AFRES wing with
one KC-135
squadron,
an ACC
ICommunications
Group;
and an Engineering
Installations
Wing.
A major
Itenant
is the US Navy Strategic
Command (TACAMO) Winq with
E-6 aircraft.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
Air pollution:
5,800,OOO
/
;:
Water
pollution:
3,124,OOO
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
0
I
d.
Other
Environmental:
0
112.
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
Installation
59,288
AND LOCATION
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
183
I
1
(
I
I
/
I
I
/
(
/
(1.
COMPONENT1
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
ITINKER
AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY CODE17.
I
7.28.96
721-312
10.
Description
and floor
slabs,
modules,
laundry
other
supporting
Air Conditioning:
DATE
I
I
WWYK003008
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
I
I
I
I
IU/M[QUANTITY[
ISM I
3,168
ILS I
LS
LS
LS
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
/
I
I
I
/
1
I
I
I
COST($OOO)
1 UNIT
COST
I
1
I
1 COST
I ($0001
I 4,530
1,4301
(4,530)
995
I
1 ( 450)
( 350)
( 125)
70)
(5,525
5,525
315
5,840
5,800
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
I
)
1
(
1
I
I
-L
1
of Proposed
Construction:
Reinforced
concrete
foundation
masonry walls
and roof.
Includes
room-bath/kitchen-room
rooms,
storage,
lounge
areas,
site
preparation,
and all
facilities.
Relocate
ball
field.
200 KW. Grade Mix:
96 El-E4.
DEC 76
1
5,800
11.
REQUIREMENT:
1,489 RM ADEQUATE:
624 RI'4 SUBSTANDARD:
188 RM
PROJECT:
Construct
a dormitory.
(Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
A major
Air Force objective
is to provide
unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel
with housing
conducive
to their
proper
rest,
relaxation
and personal
well-being.
Properly
designed
and furnished
quarters
providing
some degree of individual
privacy
are essential
to the
successful
accomplishment
of the increasingly
complicated
and important
This project
is in accordance
with the
I jobs these people must perform.
Air Force Dormitory
Master
Plan.
SITUATION:
As verified
by the Air Force Dormitory
Master
Plan,
I,t_CURRENT
_
lthe base has insufficient
facilities
to adequately
accommodate
permanent
(party
unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel
required
to live
on-base
per Air
IForce policy.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Adequate
living
quarters
will
continue
to be
Iunavailable
resulting
in degradation
of morale,
productivity,
and career
[satisfaction
for unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel.
Lowered morale
will
Icontribute
to retention
difficulties
for the Air Force.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in the new
(uniform
barracks
construction
standard,
known as "one-plus-one,"
Iestablished
by OSD. All known alternative
options
were considered
during
]the development
of this
project.
No other
option
could meet the mission
DD FORM 1391,
I
I
I
JDORMITORY (96 RN
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT
ITEM
IDORMITORY
(96 RM)
1 DORMITORY
(SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
RELOCATE BALL FIELD
SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
XJPERVISION,
INSPECTION
TOTAL REQUEST
rOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
(2.
I
I
I
I
1
Page No 184
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
I
I
i
ITINKER AIR
14. PROJECT
DORMITORY
FORCE BASE,
TITLE
(96
0KnwoMA
15.
I
RM)
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
WWYK003008
Irequirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was needed
or performed.
11998 Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM conducted:
$612K.
FY 1999 Unaccompanied
(Housing
RPM conducted:
$636K.
Future
Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM
Irequirements
(estimated):
FYOO: $655K;
FYOl:
$765K;
FY02:
$695;
FY03:
1$716~.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 Mohsen parhizkar,
(405)
734-3451.
3,168SM
= 34,088SF.
IDormitory:
FY
I
I
I
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
185
(1.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
PROJECT
12.
I
DATA
DATE
I
ITINKER AIR
14. PROJECT
DORMITORY
i12.
I
(96
a.
Estimated
(2)
15.
PROJECT
I
NUMBER
)
WWYK003008
DATA:
Design
Project
to
Data:
be accomplished
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
(b)
Where Design
Definitive
Was Most
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
Used
YES
TINKER
-
Design
Allowance
Construction Contract AwardDate
Construction
Start
290
00 DEC
01 MAR
(5)
Construction
02 JUN
(6)
Energy
(3)
(3a)
(4)
lother
OKLAI-IOMA
RM)
SUPPLEMENTAL
(1)
lb-
FORCE BASE,
TITLE
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
Completion
DEC 76
with
N/A
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
be performed
be provided
are
obsolete.
Y
from
Paw
No
186
Il.
DATE
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
(CHARLESTON
AIR
ICAROLINA
16. PERSONNEL
I STRENGTH
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROGRAM
generated)
14. COMMAND
AND LOCATION
FORCE BASE,
SOUTH
PERMANENT
1
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
15. AREA CONSTI
COST INDEX/
IAIR MOBILITY
I
0.89
COMMAND
1 SUPPORTED
STUDENTS
OFF/
ENL [CIVl
OFF1 ENL lCIV[
TOTAL
II211
( 4201 27881
8651
I
1 211
1 4201 27471
8651
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
3,733)
la* Total Acreage:
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
lcId. Authorization
Requested In This Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
le. Authorization
If. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
[CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
~($000)
la-
lb.
1
As of 30 SEP 99
End FY 2005
I1171-212
ADD TO FLIGHT SIMULATOR
FACILITY
C-17
I
(9a.
~111-111
Future
Projects:
REPAIR
RUNWAY
Included
NORTH
in
the
FIELD
425 SM
2,500
651 61
651
4,165
4,124
61
i
1,591,795
0
2,500
9,800
9,000
89,400
1,702,495
t
DESIGN
START
~
JAN
99
STATUS
-CMPL
SEP
2,500
TOTAL:
Following
Program (FY 2002)
220,244 SM
9,800
TOTAL:
9,800
Next Three Years:
9,000
10,500 SM
)9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
1442-758
MOBILITY CENTER/BASE SUPPLY
WAREHOUSE
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
An airlift
wing with four C-141/C-17
[squadrons;
an Air Force Reserve C-141/C-17
associate
airlift
wing; an Air
(National
Guard air defense detachment
with F-16 aircraft;
and a combat
Icamera squadron.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
Air pollution:
0
/
t:
Water pollution:
0
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
13,200
d.
Other Environmental:
0
112.
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog This Installation
33,829
00
I
1
I
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No 187
Il.
(2.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
IAIR
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
ICHARLESTON
AIR FORCE BASE,
SOUTH
[CAROLINA
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
I
I
1
PROJECT
171-212
9.
COST
TITLE
14. PROJECT
IC-17
ADD TO FLIGHT
SIMULATOR
[FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
COST($OOO)
I
I
COST
($000)
1 UNIT
1U/M
ISM
QUANTITY1
COST
425 1
2,400
ILS
1,600
1
:
1,020
:
1,341
( 190)
(
70)
I
LS
LS
LS
SM
LS
1
2,500
DKFX963032
ESTIMATES
ITEM
SIMULATOR
IC-17
ADD TO FLIGHT
FACILITY
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
1 PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
SEISMIC
DEMOLITION/ASBESTOS
COMM SUPPORT
ISUBTOTAL
[TOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
[SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
ITOTAL
REQUEST
ITOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
IEQUIPMENT
FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS
DATE
I
generated)
I
4.11.30
DATA
( 235)
50)
(
( 706)
(-.-- 90)
2,361
2,361
142
2,503
2,500
(20,000)
441
(6%)
(NON-ADD)
I
1
I
I
I
Demolition
of existing
Description
of Proposed Construction:
exterior
wall,
construction
of two-story
addition
to existing
simulator
facility
with high bay area,
sloped roof,
concrete
foundation
and floor
slab,
exterior
masonry walls with brick
veneer to match existing
facility,
and necessary
support.
Demolish two facilities
in the way of construction
(1,600~~).
Air Conditioning:
88 KW.
10.
11.
REQUIREMENT: 2,115
SM ADEQUATE:
1,690
SM
SUBSTANDARD:
0
(PROJECT:
Add to a C-17 flight
simulator
facility.
(New Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
An addition
is required
to provide
an adequate
facility
to
lhouse a full-motion
(six axes) flight
simulator
for the C-17 aircrews
in
Isupport
of the bedd own of the remaining
14 C-17 aircraft
scheduled
to
[arrive
at Charleston,
bringing
the total
number of aircraft
on base to 48.
[This simulator
will
provide
proficiency
and effective
mission procedures
Itraining.
It is essential
for providing
hazardous
emergency training
that
[cannot
otherwise
be conducted.
Required
areas include
a simulator
bay,
Icomputer
room, briefing
room, and an associated
hydraulic
area.
Facility
[construction
is required
in FYOl to support
the FY02 equipment
delivery
Idate.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
This project
is the second phase of a two-phase
[program to construct
a flight
simulator
addition
for the beddown of the
IC-17 aircraft
at this
installation.
The first
phase provided
two bays and
lwas approved
in the FY89 MILCON program to support
initial
delivery
of the
lnew aircraft.
This addition
will
provide
the final
bay needed to support
IC-17 aircrew
training
requirements.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
A complete
beddown of the C-17 aircraft
cannot be
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No
(
1
I
I
188
II L.
COMPONENT1
I
LIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
ZHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE,
L. PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT
DATA
12.
I
DATE
I
I
SOUTH CAROLINA
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
2-17
ADD TO FLIGHT
SIMULATOR
I
FACILITY
1
I
DKFX963032
accomplished
without
providing
required
flight
simulator
facilities
for
training
aircrews.
A delay
in required
construction
could
also
lead to
liability
claims
against
the government
from the simulator
contractor
for
not providing
adequate
facilities
when the equipment
is ready.
ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements".
A preliminary
analysis
of
reasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
(status
quo, new
construction,
addition)
was done.
It indicates
an additiion
to the
existing
C-17 flight
simulator
is the only
option
that
will
meet
operational
requirements.
a full
economic
analysis
was
Because
of this,
BASE CIVIL
not performed.
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
ENGINEER:
Lt Co1 Tony Cox,
(808)
963-4956.
C-17 Add to Flight
Simulator
Facility:
425 SM = 4,575
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
189
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
JAIR FORCE
(3. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
I
(CHARLESTON AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH CAROLINA
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IC-17 ADD TO FLIGHT SIMULATOR FACILITY
(12.
SUPPLEMENTAL
PROJECT
..
12. DATE
I
DATA
15.
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
I
DKFX963032
DATA:
I
a.
I
I
Estimated
(1)
(2)
Design
Project
to
Data:
be accomplished
by design-build
(b)
Standard
or
Where Design
Definitive
Was Most
(3)
@a)
(4)
Desiqn
Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
Design
Recently
-
NO
Used
02 JUL
with
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
DEC 76
DEVICE
editions
from
FISCAL
YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
2000
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
3010
Previous
be performed
be provided
I
DD FORM 1391C,
N/A
230
OlJuN
01 JUN
I
EQUIPMENT
NOMENCLATURE
FLIGHT SIMULATOR
-
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
Ibe
lother
appropriations:
IC-17
I
Basis:
(a)
I
procedures
are
obsolete.
COST
($000)
20000
Page
No
190
1
I
1
I
1
11. COMPONENT)
I
I
JAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
PROGRAM
14. COMMAND
I
15. AREA CONST :
COST INDEX I
0.86
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
ISHAW AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH CAROLINA
i
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL ICIVI
OFF] ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
181 981
5,788
a. As of 30 SEP 99
1 6491 45341
4811
1
1
t
81
8)
18) 98)
5,724
,b.
End FY 2005
1 6231 45011
4761
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Acreage:
(
3,387)
la. Total
4,176,816
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
Ice
2,850
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
(FY 2002)
0
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
5,000
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
80,660
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
jh.
Grand Total:
4,265,326
1
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
COST
DESIGN STATUS
(CATEGORY
CODE
START
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
-CMPL
IAND LOCATION
I
1141-454
USCENTAF OPERATIONAL
SQUADRON FACILITY
WEATHER
1,366
SM
I
2,850
SEP OC)I
NOV 99
TOTAL :
2,850
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Followinq
Program
(FY 2002)
NONE
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1722-351
DINING
FACILITY
1,898
SM
5,000
(10.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
Ninth
Air Force;
a fighter
Iwing
with
four
F-16 squadrons;
an information
warfare
squadron;
an air
[support
operations
squadron,
and a tactical
air
control
squadron.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
(12.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Real
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
Occupational
safety
Other
Environmental:
Property
Maintenance
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
0
0
0
0
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
6,039
Page
No
191
11.
(2.
COMPONENT!
I
[AIR
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
13.
FY 2001
(computer
l&X-LAW AIR FORCE BASE,
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
1
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
9.
I
VLSB013001
ESTIMATES
COST
I
ITEM
WEATHER
2,850
I
1 UNIT
IU/M~QUANTITY~
I
IUSCENTAF
OPERATIONAL
SQUADRON
[FACILITY
SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
(DISPOSAL
OF INTERIM
FACj
COMMUNICATION
SUPPORT
(PREWIRING)
(SUBTOTAL
ISM
I
1
1,366
ILS
I
1
ISM I
I
1,3611
1
)
1,330
(
COST
1
($000)
I
I
I
I
ILS I
1
COST
I
I
ILS I
I
201
I
1,859
1
832
( 315)
( 255)
( 175)
(
27)
ILS I
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
AND OVERHEAD
1
I
141-454
[SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
ITOTAL
REQUEST
ITOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
PROJECT
TITLE
JUSCENTAF
OPERATIONAL
WEATHER
[SQUADRON
FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
COST($OOO)
I
35111
DATE
I
14.
SOUTH CAROLINA
CATEGORY
CODE17.
i
DATA
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
I
MILITARY
(6%)
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
2,691
161
2,852
2,850
I
I
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Metal frame building,
concrete
[floor
and foundation,
prefinished
masonry exterior
panels,
and standing
[seam metal roof;
parking,
access road, sidewalks,
fencing,
and utilities
Iwill
be included.
Space will
be provided
for command, evaluation
and
Istandardization,
production,
training,
forecast,
and communication
Disposal
of 1330 SM in interim
facilities.
Id ivisions.
IAir Conditioning:
122 KW.
110.
I
(11.
REQUIREMENT:
1,366
SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
0
[PROJECT:
Construct
an operations
facility
for an Operational
Weather
[Squadron.
(New Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
Provide
adequate
facilities
to support
the beddown of a
[weather
squadron as part of the Air Force direction
weather mission.
)Space will
be provided
for command, evaluation
and standardization,
[production,
training,
forecast,
and communication
divisions.
This
(squadron will
provide
theater/regional
weather
forecast
guidance
for the
Iplanning
and execution
of Air Force and Army operations
within
a
(particular
theater
or CONUS region
24 hours a day, seven days a week.
IThis squadron will
produce drop zone, range,
and air refueling
forecasts,
[fine-scale
target
forecasts,
weather warnings,
terminal
forecasts,
and
[transient
aircrew
briefings.
/CURRENT
SITUATION:
This facility
will
provide
for consolidation
of
Iweather
personnel
from Army and Air Force installations
for
Itheater/regional
weather
forecasting.
The full
complement of personnel
(and equipment
to achieve
an initial
operational
capability
arrived
in
11998.
Full operational
capability
for this
148 person squadron is FY
(2001.
There are no other
facilities
on the installation
that provide
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
192
11. COMPONENT\
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
I
I
ISHAW AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
JUSCENTAF OPERATIONAL
SOUTH CAROLINA
15.
I
WEATHER
SQUADRON FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
VLSB013001
icient
space
for this
new mission
requirement.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
This
squadron
is vital
in providing
weather
data
Without
the required
facilities,
this
1for
the commander
of US Air Forces.
(unit
will
be unable
to accomplish
its
mission.
/ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria
and scope
specified
in Air
IForce
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements".
A preliminary
analysis
Iof reasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
(status
guo,
Irenovation,
upgrade/removal,
leasing,
new construction)
was done.
New
Iconstruction
is the only option
that
could
meet mission
requirements.
/Because
of this,
a full
economic
analysis
was not performed.
A
[certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1
IEdward
H Henson.
Phone:
803-668-3413.
ISUW
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page No 193
Il.
12.
COMPONENT\
I
I
IAIR
13.
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer qenerated)
-AND LOCATION
I
I
1
I
[SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH CAROLINA
14. PROJECT TITLE
(5.
I
.USCENTAF OPERATIONAL WEATHER SQUADRON FACILITY
112.
a.
DATE
I
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design Data:
PROJECT NUMBER 1
VLSB013001
Design, Bid, Build
I
I
(1)
(2)
Status:
(a)
Date Design Started
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
lb)
Percent
Complete
as
of
Jan
2000
*(c)
Date
35%
Designed.
*(d)
Date Design Complete
(e)
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design
Recently
99 NOV 03 i
costs
y I
35% )
00 JAN 01 1
00 SEP 01 1
Y
be performed
NO
N/A
Used -
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a)
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(b)
All Other Design Costs
Total
(c)
(d)
Contract
(e)
In-house
@a) Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
(3)
($000)
171
86
257
214
43
01 JAN
01 MAR (
I
(5)
Construction
Completion
02 MAR )
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
lb.
lother
I
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are obsolete.
from
Page No 194
Il.
I
[AIR
13.
I
12.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
DATE
I
I
(5.
AREA CONST
COST INDEX
0.86
I
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
JDYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
1 SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
1
OFF]
ENL
1
CIV
]
OFF]
ENL
ICIV]
OFF] ENL ICIVl
i6*
a. As of 30 SEP 99
1 6751 42831
3451
1
11261
671 701
lb. End FY 2005
1 6721 42821
3441
1 261
671 701
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Acreage:
(
6,342)
la- Total
2,772,596
(b. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
Not Yet In Inventory:
IC- Authorization
12,175
(d. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
le. Authorization
25,000
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
66,050
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
2,875,821
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
DESIGN
ICATEGORY
COST
START
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~
I- CODE
1179-481
REALISTIC
INITIATIVE
I
BOMBER TRAINING
LS
12,175
JAN
TOTAL
5,466
5,461
0
0
I
STATUS )
-CMPL 1
I
99
SEP 001
I
12,175
TOTAL:
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Proqram
(FY 2002)
NONE
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1130-142
FIRE/CRASH
RESCUE STATION
2,754
SM
6,200
7,000
1141-753
C-130
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMU
4,253
SM
1740-674
FITNESS CENTER
6,844
SM 11,800
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A wing with
two B-l bomber
squadrons,
lone of which
is responsible
for training
all B-l aircrews,
and two C-130
lairlift
squadrons.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
b.
a-
0
0
and health:
6,200
0
Backlog
This
Installation
34,919
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 195
(1.
I
12. DATE
COMPONENT\
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
FORCE
(computer
AND LOCATION
13. INSTALLATION
I
JDYESS
AIR FORCE BASE,
TEXAS
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
I
I
I
ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
TRAINING
INITIATIVE
SITE(LOW
ALT TRNG)
SITE(HIGH
ALT TRNG)
SITE
(TRAINING
ROUTE)
SITE
(OPERATION
AREA)
AND
OVERHEAD
I
I UNIT
U/M)QUANTITY
COST
LS I
LS
I
I
3,259)
( 1,815)
( 1,815)
447)
(
LS I
LS I
AC 1
COST
) ($000)
1 11,518
) ( 4,182)
1 (
LS I
165
2,709
11,518
11,518
I
(5.7%)
657
1
1
I
12,175
12,175
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
1
1
--A
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Acquisition
of land for
Iemitter
sites
and construction
of emitter
facilities
with concrete
floors,
Iwalls
and standing
seam metal roofs.
Work includes
gravel
parking
pads,
Ielectricity,
perimeter
fence,
gravel
access roads and water and sewer
llines
to emitter
sites.
Includes
all sitework
and necessary
support.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT: As required.
/PROJECT:
Construct
realistic
bomber training
initiative.
(New Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
Provide
realistic,
simultaneous,
integrated
training
using
Iinterrelated
training
assets that offer
terrain
and airspace
to simulate
lthe variety
of conditions
anticipated
for combat missions
for B-l
and B-52
aircrews.
These training
assets in the proximity
of Barksdale
and Dyess
(Air Force Bases are required
to maximize
high-value
training
time and
[reduce transit
time that yields
low training
value.
(CURRENT SITUATION:
Currently,
bomber aircraft
from Dyess and Barksdale
/fly
to training
range sites
located
over large multi-state
regions
(requiring
long sortie
durations.
Costly
flying
hours are expended while
/transiting
to and from these ranges.
Non-essential
operational
flying
[hours per year are estimated
at 300 for B-52's
from Barksdale
Air Force
IBase and 200 for B-l's
from Dyess Air Force Base.
This project
will
[eliminate
those non-essential
flying
hours and allow the training
of an
Iadditional
twenty-two
aircrews
per year.
Aircrews
will
be able to
(efficiently
train
on a range designed
for effective
and realistic
bomber
missions.
I
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The Air Force would not be able to train
and
Iproduce
replacement
aircrews
in sufficient
numbers to man B-l and B-52
[weapon systems in the future.
Aircrews
will
continue
to receive
Iinadequate
training
scenarios
and continue
to fly
additional
hours to
(10.
.
I
12,175
FNWZ013009
I
IREALISTIC
BOMBER
15 ACRE EMITTER
15 ACRE EMITTER
15 ACRE EMITTER
15 ACRE EMITTER
LAND
ACQUISITION
I
[SUBTOTAL
[TOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
[SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
ITOTAL
REQUEST
ITOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
14. PROJECT TITLE
(REALISTIC
BOMBER TRAINING
[INITIATIVE
PROJECT
NUMBER 18. PROJECT
COST($OOO))
179-481
9. COST
J
DATA
generated)
]AIR
2.76.04
PROJECT
Page No 1%
I
I
I
:
I
Il.
I
COMPONENT1
[AIR
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
PROJECT
DATA
qenerated)
TEXAS
15.
I
I
enter
I
AND LOCATION
I
IDYESS AIR FORCE BASE,
TITLE
14. PROJECT
(REALISTIC
DATE
12.
I
BOMBER TRAINING
INITIATIVE
PROJECT
NUMBER
FNwz013009
)
I
and exit
existing
training
ranges.
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
[Handbook,
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements.U'
All known alternative
options
Iwere considered
during
the development
of this project.
No other
option
lcould meet the mission requirements;
therefore,
no economic analysis
was
Ineeded or performed.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 David Biescheuvel,
(915)
1696-2250.
IADDITIONAL:
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No
197
(1.
12. DATE
COMPONENT]
I
FY 2001
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
PROJECT
I
DATA
I
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
[DYESS AIR FORCE
14. PROJECT TITLE
REALISTIC
112.
BASE,
15.
BOMBER
TRAINING
(2)
INITIATIVE
Design
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
Date Design Started
(a)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Complete as of Jan 2000
* Cc) Percent
Date 35% Designed.
* (d)
Date Design Complete
(e)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(f)
Bas is:
Standard
or Definitive
(a)
Where Design Was Most
(b)
Design
Recently
99 JAN 26
Y
35%
99 DEC 20
00 SEP 01
be performed
NA
costs
NO
N/A
Used -
Total
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(5)
1
Data:
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
All Other Design Costs
Total
Contract
In-house
(e)
(3a) Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
(3)
NUMBER
FNwz013009
DATA:
Estimated
(1)
PROJECT
I
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
TEXAS
Construction
($000)
730
366
1096
913
183 1
01 JAN I
01 MAR
I
Completion
02 SEP 1
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
lb-
[other
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC
76
this
Previous
I
project
editions
will
are
be provided
obsolete.
from
Page No 198
11.
COMPONENT1
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR FORCE
(5. AREA CONST(
AND LOCATION
13. INSTALLATION
14. COMMAND
IAIR
EDUCATION
I COST INDEX1
I
0.82
ILACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
AND TRAINING
COMMAND
1
SUPPORTED
PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
I
I
16.
OFF/ ENL ]CIVl
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
TOTAL 1
STRENGTH
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
a. As of 30 SEP 99
(17321
48611 28151
861 56701
( 621 17561 251 17,007[
lb. End FY 2005
117451 48581 35321
58) 62261
1 621 1756)
251 18,262
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
2,753)
Ia- Total Acreage:
8,280,051
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
0
Not Yet In Inventory:
IC* Authorization
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
5,500
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
5,800
le. Authorization
If. Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
37,800
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
37,600
Ih. Grand Total:
8,366,751
1
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
[CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
CODE
START
CMPL
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
__
I1721-312
DORMITORY
96 RM
5,500
JAN 99 SEP OC
TOTAL :
5,500
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
DORMITORY
96
R&l
5,800
1721-312
TOTAL:
5,800
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1721-312
STUDENT DORMITORY
200 RM 16,700
96 RM
5,800
1721-312
DORMITORY
1721-312
DORMITORY
96 RM
6,100
1740-674
FITNESS CENTER (MEDINA)
3,206
SM
5,100
1740-884
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
2,384
SM
4,100
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A training
wing which
includes
Basic
:
IMilitary
Training
School;
security
forces,
cryptographic
maintenance,
[recruiting,
and Air
Force
and Navy food service
courses;
Air
Force
ISecurity
Forces
Center,
Force
Protection
Battlelab;
Defense
Language
IInstitute,
English
Language
Center;
Department
of Defense
Military
Working
[Dog Training
Agency;
Inter-American
Air
Forces
Academy,
433rd
Contingency
IHospital,
and a major
Air Force
medical
center.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
FY 2001
I
(
(12.
I
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
E:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
771
310
0
0
33,822
Page
No
199
12. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
I
I
I
(DORMITORY
(96 RM)
(LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO) 1
8.57.96
I
721-312
MPLS023293
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
ITEM
IDORMITORY
(96 RM)
(SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
(SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
[TOTAL REQUEST
(TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
I
I
Iu/M(QUANTITY(
tSM 1 3,168
I
I
5,500
I UNIT
1
I
I COST
cosT
( ($000)
1,3491
4,274
883
I
I
I
1
(
1
(
ILS
ILS
ILS
I
AND OVERHEAD
(5.7%)
(
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
A three-story
facility
with
(concrete
foundation
and floor
slab,
structural
steel
framing,
masonry
[walls
and standing
seam metal
roof.
Includes
room-bath/kitchen-room
Imodules,
day rooms,
linen
storage,
mechanical
equipment
and communications
rooms,
fire
protection,
utilities,
parking,
and all
necessary
support.
(Extend
utility
service
to an unimproved
area of the base.
[Air Conditioning:
300 KW. Grade Mix:
96 El-E4.
:
I
1
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
2,388 RM ADEQUATE:
806 RM SUBSTANDARD:
83 RM
IPROJECT:
Construct
a dormitory.
(Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
A major Air Force objective
is to provide
unaccompanied
lenlisted
personnel
with on-base
housing
conducive
to their
proper
rest,
Irelaxation
and personal
well-being.
Properly
designed
and furnished
Iquarters
providing
some degree of individual
privacy
are essential
to
Isuccessful
accomplishment
of the increasingly
complicated
and critical
Ijobs
Air Force personnel
must perform.
This project
is in accordance
with
lthe Air Force Dormitory
Plan.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
As verified
by the Air Force Dormitory
Master
Plan,
/the base has insufficient
facilities
to adequately
accommodate
permanent
lparty
unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel
required
to live
on-base
per Air
(Force policy.
/IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Adequate
living
quarters
will
continue
to be
Iunavailable
resulting
in degradation
of morale,
productivity,
and career
Isatisfaction
for unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel.
Lowered morale
will
Icontribute
to retention
difficulties
for the Air Force.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in the new
Iuniform
barracks
construction
standard
known as "one-plus-one"
established
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No 200
I
I
)
I
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
]AIR
FORCE
(computer
generated)
13. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
I
ILACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
14. PROJECT TITLE
12.
PROJECT
DATA
15.
*I
IDORMITORY
DATE
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
(96 RM)
MPLS023293
Iby OSD.
All
known
alternative
options
were considered
during
the
Idevelopment
of this
project.
No other
option
could
meet the mission
Irequirements.
Therefore,
no economic
analysis
was needed
or performed.
Icertificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM
IConducted:
FY98 $2,59OK;
FY99 $2,00OK;
FYOO (estimated)
$2,50OK;
FYOl
I (estimated)
$2,50OK;
FY02 (estimated)
$2,50OK;
FY03 (estimated)
$2,50OK.
IBase Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 Gordon
Green,
(210)671-2977
Dormitory:
13,168SM
= 34,088
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
1
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
A
No
201
(1. COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
I
DATA
I
I
I
(LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IDORMITORY
(96
TEXAS
15.
I
RM)
PROJECT
NUMBER
(
’
MPLS023293
I
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
112.
.
Estimated
Design
Data:
I a
(1)
(2)
(3)
ba)
(4)
(5)
Design, Bid, Build
1
Status:
Date Design
Started
(a)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Complete
as of Jan 2000
* (c) Percent
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
Date Design
Complete
(e)
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
(b)
Where Design
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 22
15% 1
99 AUG 30 (
00 SEP 15 1
be performed
Y
YES
LACKIAND
Used
-
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
(cl
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
hWIIKtiOn
Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
Construction
lb.
Equipment
associated
[other
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
($000)
220
110
330
280
50
00 DEC
01 FEB
Completion
02 MAR
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
with
N/A
this
Previous
project
editions
will
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
are
obsolete.
)
y I
costs
from
Page
No
202