Department of the Air Force
Military Construction and Family
Housing Program
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2000
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
President’s Budget
Page Number
General
Table of Contents ................................................................
1
Program Summary ..............................................................
3
Militarv Construction
State Summary (List of Projects) .......................................
5
New Mission/Current Mission Exhibit ..............................
13
Installation Index ................................................................
21
Special Program Considerations:
Statements .........................................................................
23
Congressional Reporting Requirements ........................
24
Research and Development .............................................
26
Third Party Financing .....................................................
27
Appropriation Language ....................................................
29
Inside the United States Construction Projects.. ..............
31
Outside the United States Construction Projects.. ...........
231
Unspecified Minor Construction .......................................
259
Planning and Design ...........................................................
261
Working Capital Funds Construction Projects.. ..............
263
1
Inside the United States Construction Projects
12. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
/AIR FORCE
15. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION
COST INDEX!
I
I
I
1.50
[PACIFIC
AIR FORCES
IELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA
STUDENTS
1
SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
I
STRENGTH
J OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF] ENL [CIVl OFF1 ENL lCIV[
TOTAL
I 1571 40511231 10,425
1 8191 61051
8161
I
I
a. As of 30 SEP 99
1
1571
40511231
10,463
1
8221
61511
8051
b. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
13,122)
(
Ia. Total Acreage:
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
2,775,140
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
Ic27,520
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
27,500
le. Authorization
42,400
(f. Planned
In Next Three Program
Years:
239,912
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
3,112,472
I
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
START
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
CMPL 1
($000)
__
I
/JAN 99 AUG 00)
UPGRADE HANGAR COMPLEX
8,500 SM 11,600
1211-111
TURNKEY TURNKEY1
144 RM 15,920
1721-312
DORMITORY
TOTAL
:
27,520
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
19a.
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
180 RM 20,200
(740-884
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
2,512 SM
7,300
TOTAL:
27,500
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1610-285
REPAIR HEADQUARTERS BUILDING
11,767
SM 10,000
1721-312
DORMITORY
180 RM 21,100
(740-674
ADD TO AND ALTER FITNESS
4,450 SM 11,300
CENTER
Mission
or Major
Functions:
110.
Headquarters
Alaska
Command;
[Headquarters
Eleventh
Air Force.
The host wing supports
three
fighter
Isquadrons
including
two F-15C/D squadrons,
one F-15E squadron,
one E3
(airborne
warning
and control
squadron
and an airlift
squadron
with C-130H
(
land C-12 aircraft.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
1
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
0
0
;:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and health:
Previous
1,200
0
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
43,355
Page
No 50
/
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
DATA
.
PROJECT
14.
I
DATE
12.
I
TITLE
I
~ELMENDORF
AIR FORCE
PROGRAM
ELEMENT16.
15.
2.75.96
BASE,
ALASKA
/UPGRADE
HANGAR
CATEGORY
CODEli'.
PROJECT
NUMBER
18.
I
I
I
211-111
FXSB983019
9. COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
IUPGRADE
HANGAR COMPLEX
1 UPGRADE MAINTENANCE
HANGAR
1 MECHANICAL
EQUIPMENT
ADDITION
( HANGAR DELUGE
SYSTEM
1 WET PIPE SPRINKLER
SYSTEM
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
) UTILITIES
1 CONTAMINATED
SOIL REMEDIATION
( WATER STORAGE
TANK
1SUBTOTAL
JTOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
[TOTAL
REQUEST
(TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
1
ISM I
ISM
1
I
I=
I
I
I
I
11,600
COST
1
I
I
I
i
6001
2,6511
2851
851
344 (
4,415
3,940
ILS I
ILS I
(6.5%)
COST($OOO)
I U-NIT I
I
(U/MIQUANTITYI
ILS I
jSM j
8,500
I='
COMPLEX
PROJECT
1
1
COST
(so001
7,605
( 5,100)
(
912)
( 1,258)
335)
(
I 3,250
( ( 1,700)
600)
/ I
950)
)
10,855
]
10,855
I---
706
11,561
11,600
/
I
(10.
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Repair hangar roof and floor.
IReplace
electrical
wiring,
lighting,
heating
system,
water supply
line,
land exterior
doors.
Install
fire
protection
systems.
Upgrade hangar
(doors.
Install
new gas line and boilers
throughout.
Includes
soil
(remediation
and all necessary
support.
(11.
REQUIREMENT:
48,417
SM ADEQUATE:
6,201 SM SUBSTANDARD: 32,508 SM
IPROJECT:
Upgrade hangar complex.
(Current
Mission)
/REQUIREMENT:
Upgrade hangar to meet current
electrical
codes, provide
a
[fire
suppression
system meeting current
life
safety
code, and a new,
(energy-efficient
heating
system which supports
the base-wide
conversion
to
lgas heating.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
hangar was constructed
in 1942.
_
I]Functions
housed in this
facility
include
aircraft
maintenance,
squadron
loperations,
maintenance
shops, and administrative
areas.
The hangar has
(no fire
suppression
system,
and the existing
fire
detection
system is
loutdated.
The electrical
system does not meet current
standards,
the roof
Ileaks and has no insulation,
and the floor
is cracked,
causing a foreign
(object
damage hazard.
The existing
water supply
line cannot support
a
(fire
suppression
system.
The existing
steam heating
system is over 40
lyears
old and will
be replaced
by natural
gas heat.
JIMPACT
IF NOT PROVIDED:
The lack of a fire
suppression
system will
Icontinue
to expose approximately
200 personnel
and 11 fighter
aircraft
to
(the risk of loss by fire.
Roof leaks,
foreign
object
damage, and high
(energy
consumption
will
continue
to jeopardize
mission
capability.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IHandbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
options
for meeting this
requirement
has been completed.
Only one option
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
(
1
are obsolete.
Page No
)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
51
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
generated)
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
I
IELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE, ALASKA
14. PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
12. DATE
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
FXSB983019
UPGRADE HANGAR COMPLEX
a full
economic
analysis
was
Jmeets
operational
requirements.
therefore,
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
BASE CIVIL
Inot performed.
IENGINEER:
Co1 Showers,
907-552-4833.
Upgrade
Hangar
Complex:
8,500
SM =
191,000
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
52
1
(1. COMPONENT(
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
~ELMEW-DORF AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IUPGRADE
112.
I a
PROJECT
(2.
I
DATA
ALASKA
15. PROJECT NUMBER
I
FXSB983019
HANGAR COMPLEX
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design Data:
(1)
1
(2)
(3)
DATE
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
Percent
Complete
as
of
Jan
2000
* (c)
* Cd) Date 35% Designed.
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
99 JAN 29
Y
15%
99 DEC 30
00 AUG 15
Y
be performed
costs
I
Design
Recently
NO
N/A
Used
-
I
($000) (
696 1
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other Design
Costs
(c)
Total
Contract
(d)
(e)
In-house
(3a) Construction Contract Award Date
(4)
Construction
Start
(5)
/
lb-
lother
Total
Construction
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
348
1044
944
100
OODEC
with
N/A
this
Previous
1
03 JAN
project
editions
will
are
(
1
1
)
01 JAN 1
Completion
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
I
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
obsolete.
from
Page
No
53
I
(
12. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR FORCE
15. AREA CONST(
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION
JDAVIS-MONTHAN
AIR FORCE BASE,
I COST INDEX!
0.98
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
IARIZONA
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
[ OFF( ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL lCIV[ OFFI ENL lCIV1 TOTAL
STRENGTH
(
I
I 701 9113141
7,6191
a. As of 30 SEP 99
1 8581 49961 12901
7,6081
) 8591 5000) 12741
) 70)
911314)
b. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
10,633)
Total
Acreage:
(
(30 SEP 99)
1‘445,356
Inventory
Total
As Of:
0
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
7,900
(FY 2002)
17,600
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
Planned
In Next Three Program
Years:
15,500
Remaining
Deficiency:
37,485
Ih. Grand Total:
1,523,841
FY 2001
I
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS i
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
I- CODE
____
___
-CMPL (
I
1740-674
FITNESS
CENTER
(9a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the
1141-753
EC-130 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMlJ
1721-312
DORMITORY (120 RM)
I
4,760 SM
7,900
JAN 99
TOTAL:
7,900
Following
Program
(FY 2002)
3,561 SM
9,100
120 RM
8,500
TOTAL:
17,600
Next Three Years:
4,200 SM
7,400
SEP 001
I
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
19b.
1141-821
AIRCRAFT RECLAMATION/PARTS
PROCESS COMPLEX
I
1721-312
DORMITORY (120 RM)
120 RM
8,100
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
12th Air Force;
a wing with
(two fighter
training
squadrons
responsible
for training
all A/OA-10
aircrews;
one A/OA-10
fighter
squadron,
two EC-130 electronic
combat
Isquadrons,
and one EC-130 airborne
command and control
squadron;
an Air
IForce Reserve
HH-60 rescue
squadron;
an Air National
Guard air defense
Iflex
site(F-16
aircraft);
and Air Force Materiel
Command's
Aerospace
IMaintenance
and Reqeneration
center.
.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
I
I
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
0
0
E:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
)
and health:
Previous
7,300,000
I
0
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
16,863
Page No
54
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
,
IAIR FORCE
(3. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
I
IFITNESS
CENTER
DAVIS-MONTHAN
AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT(6.
CATEGORY CODEj7.
PROJECT NUMBER (8. PROJECT
DATE
I
FY 2001
2.75.96
740-674
ITEM
FITNESS CENTER
FITNESS CENTER
INDOOR POOL
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LANDSCAPING
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I_-
-
COST($OOO)
I
I
I
FBNV873005R5
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
Ju/MIQUANTITYI
(SM
( 4,760
3,360
1,400
7,900
1 UNIT
cosT
(
1 1,481
1
848
/
AND OVERHEAD
c
T
COST
($000)
6,163
(4,976)
(1,187)
1,300
( 450)
( 375)
( 350)
( 125)
7,463
7,463
425
7,888
7,900
.
110.
Two-story
facility
consisting
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
lof concrete
footings,
stem walls,
and floor
slab;
concrete
masonry
walls,
(pitched
metal
roof,
insulation,
heating
and air
conditioning,
all
support
Jutilities,
fire
detection
and protection,
restrooms,
equipment
and locker
rooms,
laundry,
steam/sauna
rooms,
suspended
track,
handball/racquetball
[Courts,
parking,
sidewalks,
and landscaping.
IAir
Conditioning:
528 KW.
)
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
7,804
SM ADEQUATE:
2,601
SM SUBSTANDARD:
0
IPROJECT:
Construct
Fitness
center.
(Current
Mission).
[REQUIREMENT:
Fitness
facilities
are required
to provide
fitness,
Jwellness,
and aerobic
areas
for military,
dependent
and retired
members.
IAdequate
space
is required
for basketball/volleyball
courts,
racquetball
(courts,
aerobic
training
areas,
and physical
conditioning
space.
/CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
base gymnasium
was built
in 1968 and is
jno longer
large
enough to meet mission
requirements.
Steady
increases
in
[the base population
have overloaded
the current
facility.
A shortage
of
/racquetball
courts,
aerobics
training
areas,
and physical
conditioning
lspace
forces
patrons
to stand
in line
and in many instances
be turned
away
(as the gym courts
or aerobics
room are full.
There
is a severe
shortage
(of general
physical
conditioning
space
and equipment.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The base fitness
center
will
continue
to be
/overcrowded
and unavailable
to large
numbers
of potential
users.
The
[situation
will
continue
to have an unfavorable
impact
on morale
and on the
Iphysical
condition
of military
personnel
who are required
to maintain
[standards
of weight
and physical
condition.
IADDITIONAL:
This Project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
55
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
IDAVIS-MONTHAN
AIR
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
[FITNESS
CENTER
FORCE BASE,
I
PROJECT
.I
DATA
12. DATE
I
I
I
ARIZONA
15. PROJECT NUMBER
I
FBNV873005R5
-
"Facilitv
Requirements."
Other alternatives
considered
IHandbook
32-1084,
New construction
is the best
uring
project
development
were not viable.
Ialternative
based on need, location,
and functionality.
An Economic
IAnalysis
was not performed.
A Certificate
of Exception
has been prepared.
IBASE CIVIL ENGINEER:
Lt Co1 Marshall
Lounsberry
(520) 228-3401.
Fitness
ICenter:
3,360 SM = 36,167
SF; Indoor
Pool:
1,400 SM = 15,069 SF
id
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
56
1
I
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR
FY 2001
I
/DAVIS-MONTHAN
14. PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
13.
MILITARY
PROJECT
DATA
qenerated)
AIR
TITLE
FORCE
BASE,
ARIZONA
15.
PROJECT
I
112.
Estimated
(1)
DATA:
Design
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 26
Y
35%
99 DEC 15
00 SEP 01
Y
be performed
costs
NO
N/A
Used -
($000)
474
237
711
592
(3)
/
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other Design Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
@a) Construction Contract Award Date
(4)
Construction
Start
01
(5)
02 SEP
Construction
1
Design,Bid, Build
Data:
Status:
(a)
Date Design Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
Percent
Complete as of Jan 2000
* (c)
*(d)
Date 35% Designed.
(e)
Date Design Complete
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(2)
NUMBER
FBNv873005R5
CENTER
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
I
I
AND LOCATION
I
IFITNESS
DATE
119
01 JAN
Completion
MAR
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
Iz;her
I
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
this
project
will
be provided
from
t
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No
57
Il.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROGRAM
14. COMMAND
12.
I
DATE
15.
AREA CONST(
COST INDEX1
I
IAIR EDUCATION
I
0.85
AND TRAINING
COMMAND
(LITTLE
ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, ARKANSAS
1 SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
16. PERSONNEL
( OFFI ENL ( CIV
OFF1 ENL ICIV( OFFI ENL (CIV( TOTAL
STRENGTH
1 638)
37581
7571
a. As of 30 SEP 99
I
I
I
I
I
I 511531
1 5,200
( 6391 38051
7561
b. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
6,898)
Acreage:
(
Ia- Total
(30 SEP 99)
8,867,156
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
0
Not Yet In Inventory:
lc- Authorization
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
17,060
(FY 2002)
Included
In Following
Program:
11,100
le. Authorization
If. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
5,308
15,000
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
8,915,624
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
DESIGN STATUS
[CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
-CMPL
1_
JAN 99 SEP 00
5,200 SM
7,960
1141-753
C-130 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
UNIT
I
9,100
JAN 00 APR 01
FITNESS CENTER
5,854 SM
1740-674
TOTAL
:
17,060
I
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program (FY 2002)
1171-212
C-130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR
3,285 SM 10,000
FACILITY
I
1921-177
C-130 DROP ZONE ADDITION
140 HA
1,100
TOTAL:
11,100
(9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned Next Three Years:
FIRE/CRASH RESCUE STATION
1130-142
3,100 SM
5,308
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
An airlift
wing with five
C-130
Isquadrons
conducting
operations
and training;only
DOD C-130 training
Ibase;an
AR ANG C-130 Airlift
Wing; and an AFRC aerial
port squadron.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
I
1
I
112.
I
a.
bc.
d.
Real
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
Occupational
safety
and health:
Other Environmental:
Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
Installation
20
815
0
0
58,136
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
I
Page No 58
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
1
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
IC-130
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
1
(AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE UNIT
LITTLE ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, ARKANSAS
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT(6.
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER (8. PROJECT COST($OOO)
(1.
I
COMPONENT1
I
4.18.96
FY 2001
I
I
141-753
9.
I
NKAK003000
COST ESTIMATES
I
ITEM
C-130 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMU
SQ OPS/AMU
HQ GROUP FACILITY
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES/COMM
SUPPORT
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION/ASBESTOS/LEAD
PAINT REMOVAL
SEISMIC/ELEVATOR
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
I
ISM I
ISM
1 UNIT
1 COST
COST
I
4,250
950
(
(
3,450
1
I
ILS
ILS
ILS
ISM
ILS
) ($000)
I 5,911
1,1521
(4,896)
1,0681
(1,015)
I 1,620
1 ( 315)
)
( 530)
1 ( 206)
781 ( 269)
1
I
)
I
1
7,960
iU/MiQUANTITYI
I
:
I
(
300)
7,531
7,531
429
7,960
7,960
/
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Construct
a one story
facility
10.
with
concrete
foundation,
masonry
walls,
structural
steel
frame,
sloping
roof
system,
and fire
protection
system,
utilities
and necessary
support.
Demolish
seven
facilities
(3,450
SM).
I
IAir
Conditioning:
703 KW.
I
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
(PROJECT:
Construct
a c-130
squadron
operations/aircraft
maintenance
unit
I (Sq Ops/AMU)
facility.
(Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
This project
is required
to consolidate
Air Mobility
/operational
squadrons
by collocating
aircraft
operators
with
aircraft
/maintainers.
The consolidation
relocates
flyers
and maintainers
out of
Iundersized
and dispersed
facilities
into
a functional
and adequately
sized
Istructure
to support
16 C-130 aircraft
assigned
to Little
Rock AFB.
The
Ifacility
will
support
Sq Ops/AMU
management
support,
briefing/debriefing
[flight
planning,
training
and testing,
flying/ground
safety,
tool
rooms,
(bench
stock,
mobility
office,
technical
order
library,
life
support,
(standardization/evaluation,
locker
rooms,
and scheduling.
Project
Iincludes
constructing
a headquarters
facility
to replace
the current
Ifacility
which
is in the way of construction.
JCURRENT SITUATION:
Squadron
operations
and the aircraft
maintenance
units
lare dispersed
among seven
facilities.
This physical
separation
creates
/fragmented
lines
of communication
and authority.
Aircrews
and maintenance
/personnel
must spend many hours
away from their
duty
location
in an effort
Ito obtain
parts,
organizational
and mobility
equipment,
and required
/training.
The existing
maintenance
facilities
were originally
constructed
lin the mid 1950s.
These facilities
are inadequately
sized
and not
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
I
I
I
I
(
59
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
IAIR
13.
12.
FY 2001
I
SQUADRON
[properly
PROJECT
DATA
qenerated)
DATE
I
AND LOCATION
I
ILITTLE
ROCK AIR
14. PROJECT TITLE
IC-130
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
I
MILITARY
FORCE
BASE,
ARKANSAS
15.
I
OPERATIONS/
MAINTENANCE
UNIT
NUMBER
IF
NOT
NKAK003000
to
PROVIDED:
I
I
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
1
I
house the unified
squadrons supporting
the C-130s.
maintenance,
and support
personnel
Operations,
[will
remain in severely
undersized
and physically
separated
buildings.
IEssential
squadron operations
and logistic
functions
will
continue
to
Irequire
additional
work-arounds
that will
degrade mission performance.
/ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IHandbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
Ireasonable
options
for accomplishing
this project
was done.
It indicates
lnew construction
is the only option
that will
meet operational
Jrequirements.
Because of this a full
economic analysis
was not performed.
IA certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
BCE: Lt Co1 Drew Jeter,
1501-987-3322.
Squadron operations/AMD
facility:
4,250SM = 45,757SF;
IHeadquarters
facility:
950SM = 10,226SF
[IMPACT
configured
AIRCRAFT
PROJECT
60
Il.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
I
AND
I
ILITTLE
ROCK AIR
PROJECT
TITLE
14.
SQUADRON
(1)
(2)
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
I
DATA
qenerated)
LOCATION
FORCE
BASE,
ARKANSAS
15.
PROJECT
OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
1
DATA:
Design
NKAK003000
UNIT
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design
Recently
I
99 JAN 26 1
y I
costs
15%
Used -
($000) I
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) :
(a)
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(b)
All Other Design Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
(3a) Cons~ctiOn Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
360 1
180 1
540 )
415
125
01 MAY
01 JUN
Completion
02 JUN
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
lother
Equipment
associated
with
appropr iations:
N/A
this
project
will
be provided
from
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
I
99 Jm 15 1
00 SEP 15 1
Y I
be performed
(3)
Construction
I
Design, Bid, Build
Data:
Status:
(a)
Date Design Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
* (c) Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
* id)
Date Design Complete
(e)
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(5)
NUMBER
I
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
MILITARY
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
C-130
DATE
12.
FY 2001
are obsolete.
Page No
61
/
11.
COMPONENT\
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
(2.
I
DATE
I
I
I
IFITNESS
CENTER
ILITTLE
ROCK AIR FORCE BASE, ARKANSAS
15. PROGRAM ELEMENTl6.
CATEGORY CODEl7. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
I
I
I
I
9,100
NKAK903003
) 8.57.96
740-674
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
1 UNIT
COST
1
I
I
COST
ITEM
($000) I
1U/M 2UANTITYl
) 1,228
7,189
)
IFITNESS
CENTER
ISM I 5,854
I
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1,400
(
I
1 UTILITIES
( 54O)l
ILS /
PAVEMENTS
( 34511
ILS
( 290) (
I SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ILS
1 DEMOLITION
( 2OO)l
ILS
1 COMMUNICATION
ILS
(- 25) )
ISUBTOTAL
8,589
(
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
8,589
1
/
490 1
JSUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%
(TOTAL REQUEST
9,079
(
IToTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
9,100
1
I
L
) i
/
/
I
I
1
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Reinforced
concrete
foundation
land slab,
sloped
roof,
and steel
frame support
with masonry
exterior.
IProject
includes
HVAC, fire
protection,
utilities,
and all necessary
Isupport.
Functional
areas include
courts,
indoor
track,
aerobic
and
(weight
rooms and administrative
areas.
Project
includes
demolition
of one
Ifacility
(2630 SM).
IAir Conditioning:
200 KW.
I
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
5,854 SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
2,650 SM
(PROJECT:
Construct
a physical
fitness
center
to include
Health
and
IWellness
Center
(Current
Mission).
/REQUIREMENT:
An adequate
facility
to conduct
comprehensive
and balanced
[programs
for recreational
sports,
athletic
training,
and physical
fitness
(is needed as an essential
feature
of the living
and working
environment
of
Ipersonnel
on the Air Force base.
Programs
to be supported
include
Iaerobic,
health,
and nutritional
training
and recreational
athletic
Iprograms.
(CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
facility
is not large
enough to
Iaccommodate
base personnel,
especially
females
interested
in participating
lin exercise/recreational
programs.
The gymnasium
does not provide
the
Irequired
space to support
the demand for basketball,
volleyball,
Iracquetball,
weightlifting,
wrestling,
judo,
karate,
and other
indoor
Irecreational
activities.
The lack of adequate
court
and instructional
/class
areas cause most programs
to be restrictive
in numbers
and some
Iprograms
cannot
even be offered.
The overall
space limitation
is
ldiscouraging
and has a detrimental
effect
on the athletic
program,
which
/is the most important
MWR program
on Little
Rock AFB.
The current
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
I
(
I
1
62
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
ILITTLE
ROCK AIR
TITLE
14. PROJECT
FITNESS
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
FY 2001
FORCE BASE,
PROJECT
-
DATA
I
ARKANSAS
15. PROJECT
I
CENTER
NUMBER 1
I
NIcAK903003
Imandatory
aerobic
testing
is conducted
in an overcrowded
office
area that
Idoes not maintain
the required
temperature
level.
The weight
room is
Isqueezed
into
a small
area and is not conducive
to proper
conditioning
Iwork or safety.
Due to numerous
additions
to the existing
facility
Ifunctional
layout
and access are poor and utilities
are undersized
for
Icurrent
loads.
IIMPACT
IF NOT PROVIDED:
The physical
conditioning
environment
will
Icontinue
to be overcrowded
and unsafe.
Proper
training
and conditioning
lof personnel
will
not be met.
Because there
is a lack of nearby
fitness
Icenters,
personnel
will
lose significant
time and money commuting
and
Ipaying
dues to private
alternative
facilities.
Without
benefit
of this
Iquality-of-life
initiative
the Air Force will
be hampered
in its ability
Ito attract
and retain
quality
personnel.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
Ireasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
was done.
It indicates
(that
new construction
is the only option
that will
meet operational
[requirements.
Because of this
a full
economic
analysis
was not performed.
IBCE:
Lt Co1 Drew Jeter,
501-987-3322.
Fitness
Center:
5854SM = 62,989SF
I
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No 63
I
I
I
Il.
COMPONENT1
12.
I
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
(AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
1
ILITTLE
ROCK AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
FITNESS
112.
a.
PROJECT
IS.
I
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(2)
(3)
(3a)
(4)
(5)
I
PROJECT
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
I
00 JAN 04
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
% I
00 APR 30 1
01 APR 30 1
be performed
I
-
NO
Used
-
N/A
($000)
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are
obsolete.
(
1
(
1
1
o\nJN
I
iI-AUG
from
Page
1
546
273
819
683
136
Completion
with
N/A
I
1
y I
costs
*
IEther
1
I
NKAK903003
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a)
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
Cc)
(d)
Contract
(e)
In-house
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
Construction
NUMBER
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
* (c) Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
(b)
Where Design
I
ARKANSAS
CENTER
(1)
DATE
I
DATA
No 64
11.
COMPONENT1
JAIR
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
12.
I
DATE
(5. AREA CONSTI
13.
I
I COST INDEX1
I
1.25
IAIR COMBAT COMMAND
IBEALE AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1
SUPPORTED
PERSONNEL
I
16.
1
OFF]
ENL
1
CIV
1
OFF1
ENL
ICIV/
OFF!
ENL
ICIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
I
)
324)
2841)
6091
1
)
1
201
119)
66)
3,979)
As
of
30
SEP
99
la1 3241 28551
6061
1 201
1191 661
3,990
lb. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Acreage:
(
22,944)
la* Total
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
5,490,518
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
ICId. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
3,800
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
6,000
le. Authorization
0
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
26,814
Ih. Grand Total:
5,527,132
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
[CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
-CMPL )
II
1841-165
WATER TREATMENT PLANT AND
LS
3,800
JAN 99 SEP 001
DISTRIBUTION
LINE
I
I
TOTAL:
3,800
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1149-962
CONTROL TOWER
LS
6,000
TOTAL :
6,000
Future
Projects:
19b.
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A reconnaissance
wing which
includes
two
I
IU-2 reconnaissance
squadrons,
one of which
is responsible
for
training
all
I
I
III-2 aircrews;
a Contingency
Airborne
Reconnaissance
System
(CARS);
an Air
/Force
Space Command missile
warning
squadron
which
operates
one of the
IPhased
Array
Warning
System
(PAVE PAWS) radars;
and an Air Force
Reserve
winq with
KC-135
aircraft.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
Ill.
I
/
I
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
0
0
0
0
E:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and
Previous
health:
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
I
I
22,333
Page
No
65
12. DATE
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
I
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
JWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND
I
IDISTRIBUTION
LINE
/BEALE AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
PROGRAM
ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
PROJECT
NUMBER
18.
PROJECT COST($OOO)
15.
I
I
I
I
2.74.56
841-165
BAEY961005Rl
3,800
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
1 UNIT
1 COST
U/M QUANTITY
COST
1 ($000)
ITEM
IWATER TREATMENT PLANT AND DISTRIBUTION
I
ILINE
I 3,543
) WATER TREATMENT PLANT
1 (3,318)
ILS I
1 DISTRIBUTION
LINE
1251
( 225)
ILM I 1,800 1
[SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
I
40
I
I
1 DEMOLISH EXISTING
TREATMENT PLANT
ILS I
1SUBTOTAL
3,583
[TOTAL CONTRACT COST
/
I
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
I
I
204
ITOTAL REQUEST
3,787
I
I
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
3,800
1
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
I
I
I
I
1
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Construct
a water treatment
[plant
to comply with the safe drinking
water standards
regarding
manganese
land iron.
Construct
a new 1,800
meter
distribution
line
to the existing
III.4
million
liter
storaqe
tank.
Demolish
existinq
water treatment
plant.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
[PROJECT:
Construct
a water treatment
plant
and distribution
line.
I (Current
Mission)
This is a Level
I environmental
compliance
requirement.
[REQUIREMENT:
[Beale AFB has received
five notices
of violation
(NOVs) for Total
Coliform
IRule
(TCR) violations
and is out of compliance
with Article
16, Section
164449 of the California
Code of Regulations
(CCR Article
16) for exceeding
lthe secondary
standard
Maximum Contaminant
Level
(MCL) for manganese
(Mn).
IThis
project
will
remove manganese
and iron and lower the associated
[chlorine
demand,
reduce
the water residence
time,
eliminate
TCR NOVs and
Iallow
Beale to comply
with CCR Article
16.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
To minimize
residence
time in the water distribution
Isystem
and maintain
chlorine
residuals,
the base flushes
over 27,000
/gallons/day
of treated
water from open fire
hydrants
into
the storm
sewers.
This practice
is wasteful
and the base still
receives
NOVs for
ITCR violations.
The base received
one NOV within
a I2 month period;
four
INOVs results
in a monetary
fine NOV and placement
on the EPA
[Non-Compliance
list.
Mn levels
average
out of compliance
with CCR Article
116.
High MI-I levels
exert
a high chlorine
demand and cause brown-colored,
[staining
water when treated
with chlorine.
Beale AFB currently
adds a
[polymer
to keep the Mn and Fe in solution
in the distribution
system.
IHowever,
it is expensive
($50,00O/year)
and does not maintain
compliance
/with
the standard.
This project
also brinqs
Beale AFB into
compliance
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
66
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
/AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
I
JBEALE AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
14. PROJECT TITLE
WATER TREATMENT
PLANT AND DISTRIBUTION
12.
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
LINE
DATE
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
BAEY961005Rl
[with
CCR Article
16 and eliminates
the need for polymer
addition,
stops
Iwasteful
discharge
of treated
water,
and complies
with
backflow
prevention
Istandards.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Long residence
times
will
continue
to result
in
positive
coliform
results,
and NOVs for
(reduced
chlorine
residuals,
Iviolating
the TCR.
There
is a high probability
Beale
AFB will
receive
a
Imonetary
NOV and be placed
on the EPA Non-Compliance
list.
The base will
[continue
to be out of compliance
with
CCR Article
16.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
"Facility
Req-uirements.1'
[Handbook
32-1084,
All known alternative
options
[were
considered
during
the development
of this
project.
No other
option
(could
meet the mission
requirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was
Ineeded
or performed.
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Base
Lt Co1 Kevin
Rumsey,
(916)
634-2942.
ICivil
Engineer:
Transmission
line:
11800~~ = 5904LF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
)
I
/
1
I
1
1
I
67
12.
11. COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
I
[BEALE AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IWATER TREATMENT
PLANT AND DISTRIBUTION
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
LINE
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(3a)
(4)
(5)
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
NUMBER
99 JAN 26
Used
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
35%
99 DEC 10
00 SEP 01
Y
be performed
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
this
Previous
1
1
1
I
NO
N/A
-
($000)
228
114
342
285
57
01 JAN
01 MAR
Completion
with
N/A
1
y I
costs
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a)
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
te)
In-house
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
Construction
1
BAEY961005Rl
-
02 MAR
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
lother
PROJECT
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
Parametric
Cost
Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Percent
Complete
as
of
Jan
2000
* (c)
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
(b)
Where Design
DATE
I
project
editions
will
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page
No
68
12. DATE
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
generated)
15. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
IAIR FORCE
FORCE BASE,
I COST INDEX1
1.12
MATERIEL COMMAND
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
) SUPPORTED
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL ICIV]
OFF] ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
III
II
108
1 251
711 12 I
I
108
1 251
711
121
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
13)
la. Total Acreage:
(30 SEP 99)
2,066,482
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
IC- Authorization
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
6,580
(FY 2002)
Included
In Following
Program:
25,000
le. Authorization
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
0
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
29,700
]h. Grand Total:
2,127,762
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
PROJECT TITLE
CODE
SCOPE
START
($000)
~
-CMPL
I1740-674
FITNESS CENTER
2,800
SM
6,580
TURN KEY
TOTAL
:
6,580
J
1I
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
I
CONSOLIDATED
BASE SUPPORT
1610-128
17,110
SM 25,000
I
COMPLEX
TOTAL:
25,000
Future
Projects:
9b.
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
Mission
or Major
Functions:
The Space and Missile
Systems
Center
110.
S. and allied
forces
with
satellites
and the systems
to
1 (SMC)equips
U.
/employ
those
satellites
in support
of global
military
operations.
[Conducts
the research,
development,
and sustainment
of U.
S. military
[space
systems.
The center
is the cradle-to-grave
system
manager
of
[numerous
weather,
navigation,
communication,
surveillance
satellite
Isystems,
ballistic
missile
defense
systems,
and space
launch
systems.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
Air pollution:
115,000
Water
pollution:
/
it:
0
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
0
d.
Other
Environmental:
0
112.
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
Installation
145
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
ILOS ANGELES AIR
ICALIFORNIA
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
a.Asof30SEP99
b. End FY 2005
DD FORM 1390,
FY 2001
1 DEC 76
MILITARY
(computer
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
69
12. DATE
11. COMPONENT1
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
I
IFITNESS
cmTER
ILOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
I
740-674
7.28.06
9.
6,580
ACJP933005
COST ESTIMATES
I UNIT I COST
QUANTITY]
COST
1 ($000)
1U/M
2,800
1
1,7401
4,872
I 34 :
I
1,341
I
1
(
438)
I=
1
(
225)
ILS
(
125)
ILS
1,850
150
( 278)
ISM
( 200)
ILS
(
75)
I Is
6,213
I
6,213
1
I ~ 354
6,567
6,580
I
I
ITEM
[FITNESS
CENTER
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
DEMOLITION
ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
SUPPORT
ISUBTOTAL
(TOTAL CONTRACT COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
ITOTAL REQUEST
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
(5.7%)
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
lmasonry
walls,
standing-seam
pitched
metal
land all
other
necessary
support.
Includes
Iracquet
ball
courts,
weight
rooms,
rest
Iexercise
and training
space,
and wellness
/cl,850
SM).
[Air
Conditioning:
350 KW.
I
Concrete
foundation/slab,
roof,
utilities,
landscaping,
multi-purpose
ball
court,
rooms,
lap pool,
sauna,
jacuzzi,
center.
Demolish
two facilities
DEC 76
Previous
editions
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
I
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
2,800
SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
1,850
SM
IPROJECT:
Fitness
center.
(Current
Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
An adequate
facility
is required
for the physical
fitness
of
Imilitary
personnel
to support
combat
readiness
and national
emergencies
land promote
healthier
lifestyles
for military
personnel
and their
/families.
Functional
fitness
centers
improve
quality
of life
by enhancing
[readiness,
promoting
good health,
and providing
recreation
to help
[moderate
the stresses
of military
life.
Physical
well-being
and good
Imorale,
in part
from exercise,
team,
and individual
sports,
contribute
to
Ideveloping
the self-confidence
and physical
strength
required
during
Icontingencies.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
inadequate
facilities
were converted
to
Iphysical
fitness
centers
on a piecemeal
basis.
The facilities
are not
[configured
to accommodate
the physical
exercise
activities
of the base
Ipopulation
of over
1,950
military
personnel
and 2,687
dependents.
Many
Ipeople
are turned
away and the number of athletic
programs
are limited,
/despite
optimum
scheduling
and the use of waiting
lists.
Due to the high
lcost
of living
in Los Angeles,
access
to private
athletic
facilities
is
(not economically
available
to most assigned
personnel.
DD FORM 1391,
1
I
I
are
obsolete.
Page
No
I
I
70
Il.
COMPONENT/
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
ILOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
FITNESS
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
I
CALIFORNIA
15.
I
CENTER
PROJECT
NUMBER
ACJP933005
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Facility
shortcomings
will
continue
to hamper
(physical
conditioning
and recreational
programs,
with
negative
impact
on
Military
personnel
will
have limited
access
Iphysical
fitness
and morale.
/to a physical
fitness
facility
to maintain
Air Force
physical
fitness
/standards
required
to support
combat
readiness
and national
emgergencies.
[ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in the Air
IForce
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements.1'
An economic
analysis
has
Ibeen prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
[revitalization,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
land benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
new construction
was found
to
[be the most cost
efficient
over
the life
of the project.
Base Civil
IEngineer:
Lt Co1 William
Saunders,
(310)
363-0287.
Fitness
Center:
12,800~~
= 30,128SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page
No
I
1
I
71
Il.
COMPONENT!
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
DATE
12.
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
qenerated)
I
DATA
_I
AND LOCATION
I
ILOS ANGELES
14. PROJECT
I
IFITNESS
I
112.
FORCE
(1)
(2)
(3)
(3a)
(4)
[other
CALIFORNIA
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
/
I
ACJP933005
CENTER
Estimated
I
BASE,
I
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
lb-
AIR
TITLE
DATA:
Design
Project
Data:
to be accomplished
by design-build
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design Allowance
Construction Contract Award
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
Design
Recently
procedures
-
NO
Used -
N/A
329
Date
00 DEC
01 JUN
02
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
y
be performed
be provided
SEP
I
from
I
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page NO
72
(2. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
15. AREA CONST
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
IAIR FORCE
IVANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE,
I COST INDEX
1.20
SPACE COMMAND
ICALIFORNIA
STUDENTS
1
SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
PERSONNEL
16.
OFF! ENL ICIV]
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
1 OFF] ENL 1 CIV
STRENGTH
1 5761 21581 10161
a. As of 30 SEP 99
I
I
I 681
I
I 3,818
1 681
1 3,774
1 5781 20781 10501
b. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
11,551)
(
la. Total Acreage:
(30 SEP 99)
1,282,273
Inventory
Total
As Of:
0
c. Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
lbId. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
4,650
(FY 2002)
19,947
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
20,900
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
65,473
Ih. Grand Total:
1,393,243
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
[CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
CODE
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
CMPL
1
($000)
I~
~START
1841-161
I
I
UPGRADE WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
41,500
Future
Projects:
Included
in
19a.
1730-441
BASE EDUCATION CENTER
1851-142
MISSILE
TRANSPORT BRIDGE
the
LM
4,650
TURN KEY
TOTAL:
4,650
Following
Program
(FY 2002)
3,540
SM
8,300
750 LM 11,647
TOTAL:
19,947
Next Three Years:
250 SM
1,000
9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
214-467
REFUELING
VEHICLE
MAINTENANCE
SHOP
442-257
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
STORAGE
1,850
SM
3,800
FACILITY
740-674
FITNESS CENTER
5,051
SM 11,600
1740-884
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
1,900
SM
4,500
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
Fourteenth
Air Force;
a
[space
wing with
UH-1 aircraft;
West Coast
space
launch
and missile
test
loperations;
an Air
Force
Materiel
Command detachment
of the Space and
[Missile
Systems
Center;
and an Air Education
and Training
Command space
and missile
training
group.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
;:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
2,250,OOO
5,900,000
100,000
4,090,000
89,745
Page
No
73
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
I
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
IUPGRADE WATER DISTRIBUTION
I
ISYSTEM
[VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)I
I
I
I
XUMU003005R
4,650
841-161
3.58.56
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
IuNIT
I COST
U/MjQUANTITYj
COST
1 ($000)
ITEM
41,500
1
I
4,000
LM
1
IUPGRADE WATER DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM
:
1 DISTRIBUTION
LINES,
6"-10"
LM 1 30,000
1
72 I
(2,160)
1601
(1,840)
1 SUPPLY LINES,
18"-24"
LM 1 11,500
1
394
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
I
I
I
1 PAVEMENTS
25)
I
(
LS I
1 SITE RESTORATION
(
21)
I-s I
300
VALVES
EA
350
1 105)
EA
180
1,350
FIRE HYDRANTS
( 243)
4,394
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
4,394
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
250
4,644
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
4,650
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
10.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Upgrade
water
supply
and
distribution
lines
in the main cantonment
area of Vandenberg
AFB.
Includes
all necessary
pipelines,
valves,
backflow
devices,
blow-off
and
air
release
valves,
fire
hydrants,
cathodic
protection,
appurtenances,
and
associated
road repairs.
Abandon
existing
system
in place
as necessary.
11.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
Upgrade
water
distribution
system.
(Current
Mission)
PROJECT:
REQUIREMENT:
This
is a Level
1 Environmental
Compliance
requirement.
Vandenberg
AFB does not meet CA Title
22, Sections
64654 and 64656 of
California's
safe
drinking
water
act.
Title
22 mandates
that
the maximum
contaminant
level
must be less
than one positive
sample
per every
40
samples
in public
water
systems.
Additionally,
a detectable
disinfectant
Iresidual
of 0.2 milligrams
per liter
must be maintained
throughout
95
Ipercent
of the system.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The water
distribution
system
in the main cantonment
Iarea
of the base was originally
constructed
in 1943.
Since
then,
over
80
Ipercent
of the ~~11 facilities
have been demolished,
but the water
system
Iserving
these
sites
remains
largely
active
but unused
causing
stagnation.
[The network
of randomly
capped,
abandoned
and underutilized
water
supply
[lines
provide
recesses
within
the system
where
drinking
water
stagnates.
IThis
stagnation
leads
to loss
of disinfectant
residual
and violates
CA
/Title
22.
Lack of disinfectant
has led to bacteria
growth
exceeding
the
lstate
bacteriological
standards
of 0.2 mg/l.
Degradation
of chloramine
/disinfectant
during
stagnation
releases
nutrients
that
certain
types
of
Ibacteria
thrive
on, further
violating
CCR Title
22.
Multiple
line
breaks
[in 1996 and 1997 resulted
in positive
bacteriological
samples
that
led to
la notice
of violation
(NOV) in 1997.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
:
I
I
1
74