1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
F'Y 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(computer generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
ADD/ALTER MISSILR MAINTENANCE VEHICLE
FACILITY
6. CATEGORY
5. PROGRAM ELEMKNT
CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
214-426
3 5 9 9 6
9.
Auth:
Approp:
QJvF952007
COST
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
3,190
3,050
ESTIMATES
UNIT
ADD/ALTER MISSILE MAINTENANCE FACILITY
COST
2,438
LS
1,550
ADDITION
ALTERATIONS
I?
I SM
ANTITERRORISM FORCE PROTECTION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
1,470
(
2,279)
(
1,550
7
149)
(
11)
430
I
UTILITIES
LS
(
125)
PAVEMENTS
LS
(
125)
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LS
(
DEMOLITION
LS
I
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY
(
120)
(
60)
2,868
5.0
%I
143
3,012
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SDPBRVISION, INSPECTION AND OVRRRRAD
(
5.7
%)
172
TOTAL REQUEST
3,183
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
3,190
10. Description of Proposed Construction: Concrete foundation, floor slabs, masonry
walls, and roof system. Includes fire protection system, utilities, waeh rack, vehicle
parking stalls and all necessary support. Comply with DOD interim minimum force
protection construction standards.
11. RRQUIRRMENT:
?ROJECT:
3,092 SDl
ADEQUATE: 0 SM
SUBSTANDARD: 1,542SM
Add/Alter missile maintenance vehicle facility. (Current Mission)
An adequate facility is needed to insure that missile maintenance vehicles
zREQu1RRMRNT:
It is required to provide proper vehicle
rre in "ready to operate. status at all times.
aaintenance, minor repair, and quick response capabilities. A heated facility ie needed
It is also important that proper facilities
due to the harsh winters in North Dakota.
for washing the vehicles are provided to provide corrosion control. These vehicles
provide maintenance and supplies to missile equipment and facilities, and they must be
ready to respond at all times.
b-DRREXT SITUATION: There is currently no adequate facility to house 90 of the missile
support vehicles at Minot AFR. Thus, it is difficult to provide adequate maintenance
Ear these critical vehicles. The severe cold weather and extremely low windchills, as
low as minus 100 degrees Fahrenheit during the winter months, hinder the ability to
Perform maintenance and sustain readiness. This impairs mission accomplishment. The
vehicles stored outside must be started several times a day to maintain mission
This wastes manhours and decreases engine life. Personnel must spend
readiness.
aanhours clearing snow and ice off the vehicles. The bitter cold was responsible for
ruining five vehicle engines in the last two years. The present facility lacks adequate
entryways, and often vehicles are moved only to allow another to exit or be worked on.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
15 5
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(computer
2. DATE
generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
ADD/ALTER MISSILE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE
FACILITY
5. PROGRAM
ELEMENT
35996
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
214-426
QJVF952007
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
3,190
This also wastes manhours and fills the facility with fumes.
The existing wash area
accommodates only one small vehicle at a time and does not acconuaodate the larger
nuclear-certified payload transporters and transporter-erectors resulting in increased
:orrosion. Combined, these factors may negatively impact the mission effectiveness and
nlert rate. This could affect the strategic posture of our missiles and the nation's
security. Without dependable vehicles, crews cannot respond to repair the missiles.
CWPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Lack of a larger heated vehicle facility to house all the
vehicles will continue to negatively impact the maintenance of 150 Minuteman III
tntercontinental Ballistic Missiles. The maintenance crews will continue to suffer due
to severe cold weather. Monthly vehicle maintenance, pre-operational functional
inspections and area functional checkouts will continue to be difficult to perform.
?ehicles will continue to be moved into tight quarters, increasing safety risks,
ielaying dispatches, and expending additional manhours. Vehicle response times will
zontinue to decrease. Personnel will continue to work in freezing conditions to
Jenerate frozen vehicles with no alternative.
This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Handbook 32UlDITIONAL:
1084, "Facility Requirements." A preliminary analysis of reasonable options for
xcomplishing this project was done.
It indicates there is only one option which will
neet operational needs. Because of this, a full economic analysis was not performed. A
:ertificate of exception has been prepared. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Leslie Martin,
Add/Alter Missile Maintenance Facility: 1,550 SM = 16,678 SF.
[701)723-2434.
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location
Ire incompatible with use by other components.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
156
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
ADD/ALTER MISSILE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE
FACILITY
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGGRY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
35996
214-426
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
QJVF952007
3,190
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
* (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
02-APR-02
YES
15%
lo-AUG-02
lo-AUG-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) I (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
186
93
279
240
39
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DEC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Completion
04 NOV
l
Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editaons are obsolete.
Page NO.
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
IINSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
WRIGHT PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE,
AIR FORCE MATERIEL
COST INDEX
OHIO
COMMAND
0.97
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF ENL
OFF ENL CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
CIV
:AS OF 30 SEP 02
2490 13634
81
2730
138 4,169
LEND FY 2007
2622
2564 13184
81
138
4169
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
8,145
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
,Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
IAuthorization Requested in this Program:
~Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
Planned in Next Four Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
721-312
Dvrrnitory
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
No Projects
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
113-321
Replace West Ramp, Ph 2
130-142
Consolidated Fire/Crash Rescue Station
Consolidate Materials Computational
31 o-933
Research Facility
Consolidated Aeronautical Sciences
Laboratory
311-171
311-173
Information Technology Complex, Ph 1
Information Technology Complex, Ph 3
311-173
Alter Acquistion Support Facility
311-173
Consolidate AFMC Law Offices
610-112
61 O-243
Information Technology Complex, Ph 2
Security Forces Admin Facility
61 O-835
Dormitory
721-312
Add/Alter Chapel Activities Center
736-773
Replace Steam Lines/Tunnels Area B,
1822-265
Phase 1
Replace Steam lines/Tunnels Area B,
Phase 2
1822-265
ADAL FME Laboratory
1141454
‘9c. Real Prooerv Maintenance Backloa This Installation
TOTAL
23,242
22,698
4,975,367
113,729
10,500
cl
210,400
106,500
5,416,496
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS
SCOPE
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
144
RM
Total
(FY2005)
10,500 Design-Build
10,500
98,667
3,319
SM
SM
8,700
10,600
6,000
SM
16,000
6,838
9,832
9,232
13,400
7,150
10,962
5,765
96
1,300
6,834
SM 18,000
SM 21,000
SM 23,000
SM 17,600
SM
8,000
SM 23,000
SM 12,800
RM
7,400
SM
3.300
1
LS
11,300
1
LS 11,200
SM 18,500
11
158
11. COMPONENT
j
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
12. DATE
I
AIR FORCE
I
I
ICOMMAND:
j 5. AREA CONST
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
WRIGHT PAT-I-ERSON AIR FORCE BASE,
AIR FORCE MATERIEL
COST INDEX
0.97
OHIO
COMMAND
10. Mission or Major Functions: Air Force Materiel Command headquarters which is responsible management,
control, and direction of research, acquisition and logistics support for air and space weapon systems and
related components; Aeronautical Systems Center; Air Force Research Laboratory including directorates for
Materials, Sensors, air Vehicles, Human Effectiveness, and propulsion; Air Force Institute of Technology; Air
Force Museum; Air Force Security Assistance Center; National Aerospace Intelligence Center; National
Airborne Operations Center; and air base wing; Air Force Reserve Command airlift wing with two C-141 airlift
squadrons; and an AMC airlift flight with C-21 aircraft.
11. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
1,920
I
b. Water Pollution
c. Occupational Safety and Health
d. Other Environmental
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
I’
159
1. mRRNT
PY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MTA
AIRFORCE
(cauputer generated)
3. INSTALIATION AWD LOCATION
4. -CT TITLE
WFlIQiT PATTRRSON AIR FORCE BASE, ORIO
DORMITORY (144 RR)
5.
2. DATE
PRoGRAw -
6.
CATRGORY CODR 7. PROJECT Ml16Bw
72896
721-312
9.
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
!izTv973211
10,500
COST ESTIMATES
DORMIMRY (144 RR)
DORMITORY
ABTl'ITRRRORISM FORCE PRoTEcTION
( 7,679 1
SDPPORTfbK3 FACILITIRS
DTILITILS
SITE IMPROVRMEMPS
PAWS
COAQUDRICATIORS SUPPORT
cox?rINGENcY
( 5.0 %)
TOTAL co- CO&
SUPEFWISION,
INSPECTION AND B
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTALRRQDRST(RODNDRD)
I
10,500
LO. Description of Proposed Construction: A three-story facility with reinforced
:oncrete fouadation aud floor slabs, masonry walls and roof. Includes roamJath/kitchen-room modules, laundry facility, storage, lounge areas, site preparation,
seimnic requirements and all supporting utilities. Ccmplies with DOD interim minimum
Eorce protection construction standard.
h.ir Conditioning:
11. RIZQ-:
195 Kw.
620 RM
Grade Mix:
El-E4
ADEQUA~: 3 6 3 RN
144
SUBSTANDARD:
ORB!
PmJEcT:
Construct a dormitory. (Current Mission)
A major Air Force objective provides unaccompanied enlisted personuel with
housing conducive to their proper rest, relaxation and personal well-being. Properly
designed and furnished quarters providing same degree of individual privacy are
essential to the successful acccmplisWt of the increasingly cwlicated and important
jobs these people must perform. The retention of these highly trained airmen is
assential to our readiness posture and continuing world-wide presence. Caaplies with
DOD interim minimum force protection construction standard.
REQ-:
CDRRRNT SITUATION: The base has insufficient on-base housing to accosmodate the
unaccanpanied enlisted personnel. This project is in accordance with the Air Force
Dormitory Master Plan.
Adequate living quarters which provide a level of privacy
IMPACTIFNOTPROVIDRD:
required for today's airmen will not be available, resulting in degradation of morale,
productivity, and career satisfaction for uuacccmpanied enlisted personnel.
ADDITIORAL:
This project meets the criteria/scope specified in the new uniform barracks
construction standard, known as "one-plus-me", established by OSD. Allkaown
alternatives were considered during the develaplllent of this project. No other option
could meet the mission requirements. Therefore, no economic analysis was needed or
DD FORM 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
160
1. CoMPoNRm
FY 2004 MILITARY CObWrRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(cwter generated)
N.RFORCR
3. aSTALLATION AND LOCATIOEJ
4. PROJECT TITLE
HRIGBT PMTBRSON AIR FORCR BASR, OHIO
DORMITORY (144 RM)
5.PROGRAMRLlmQ?r
72096
2. DATE
6. CATBQORY CODE
721-312
7. PROJECT NUMBBR
zHTv973211
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
10,500
mrformed. ~Y2001 macccmpanied Rousing RPM Conducted: $66OK. FY2002 unaccacQanied
knming Rpll Conducted: $563K. FutureUnaccaupaniedHousingRFMrequiremaents
estimated): FYo3: $412K; FYO4: $37011; l'YO5: $27OK. Base Civil Engineer: Hr Gary
~olumon, (937) 257-6214. Dormitory: 4,752 SM = 51,132 SF. Design Build - Design Build
:ost (4% of Subtotal Cost): $370,000.
FORM 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
161
1. CowPoNEwT
FY 2004 MILITARY COIUSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
(ccmputer generated)
LIRmRcE
3. IWSTALLATION ACID LOCATION
4. - TITLE
WRIGBT PATTERSONAIR FORCE BASE, OHIO
DORNITORY (144 RB¶)
s.PROGRAMm
6.C!ATEGORYCO=
72896
721-312
7.PROJBCTNDHRER
B. PROJ-ECT COST ($000)
ZHTV973211
10,500
12. SUPP -AI, DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Project to be accau9lished by design-build procedures
(2) Basis:
(a) Stan&rd or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Host Recently Used (3) All Other Design Costs
(4) Constructicm Contract
No
284
Award
03 DEC
(5) Constnlction start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Ccapletion
05 &TON
(7) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
YES
b. Rquipment atpociated with this project provided frau other appropriations:
N/A
FORM 1391,
DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
‘i. COMPONENT
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
12. DATE
AIR FORCE
c‘:!. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
14LTUS AIR FORCE BASE
AIR EDUCATION AND
COST INDEX
(IKLAHOMA
TRAiNING COMMAND
0.98
f5. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
:strength
ENL
OFF ENL CIV
OFF
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
TOTAL
I4s OF 30 SEP 02 303
1347 1233
147
196
0
0
0
0
3,22(5
fIND
FY
2007
303
1353 1251
147
196
0
0
0
0
3,25C 1
i7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
i3. Total Acreage:
5,982
t1. Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,008,68E5
c:. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
23,3OC1
(1. Authorization Requested in this Program:
1,141I
c2. Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
(1
f‘. Planned in Next Four Years Program:
40,251I
! g. Remaining Deficiency:
2,10( 1
t1. Grand Total:
1,075,48:3
13. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
(ZATEGORY
’
PROJECT TITLE
! :ODE
171-212
C-17 Modify Simulator Bays
!3a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS
SCOPE
$000 S T A R T C M P L
LS
1,144 Apr-02
Aug-03
Total
1,144
(FY2005)
None
!3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
111-111
Airfield Pavements
111-111
ALZ Land Acquisition
219-944
Base CE Complex
724-417
Construct Visitor Quarters
LS
800 AC
9,551 SM
100 PN
4
17,000
1,232
10,019
12,000
40,251
43
E)c. Real Property Maintenance Backlog This Installation
1IO. An air mobility wing with one C-5 squadron, one C-17/C-141 squadron, and one KC-135 air refueling
E;quadron -- responsible for training all C-5, C-17, C-141 and KC-135 aircrews in the Air Force.
1Il. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
0
b. Water Pollution
0
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
148,000
I
1ID Form 1390,24 Jul 00
163
1. CaIPwmT
Fy 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJRCT DATA
(computer generated)
AIRFORCR
3. INSTALLATIOHAND LOCATICW
4. PROJECT
ALTgSAIR FORCRBASE, ORLAECWA
C-17 w3DIFY SINDLATOR BAYS
5. PROGRAN
2. DATE
KLgyKblT
6. CATXGORY CODR
41130
7. PROJRCI
-xR
- 0 2 3 0 0 4
171-212
9.
TITLE
COST
‘i-1
,
ESTIWATES
UHIT
SIMULATOR RAY MDDIFICATION
COST
720
L8
304
STJPPORTINI: FACILITIRS
SUPPORTINI3 FACILITIES
Ls
SUBTOTAL
..
(
384)
1,104
1,104
TOTAL CONTRMT COST
SDPER~SION, INSPRCTION AND OVERBEAD
(
5.7
63
%I
TOTAL REQUEST
1,167
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNMD)
1,167
Iustall uew roll-up doors, modify bridge
10. Descriptiof-of Proposed Coustruction:
crane for l-ton Wpacity, replace carpeting in classrocem, repair ccnnputer roam
flooring, upgrade chiller for simulators, modify fire protection/detection systems, and
new electrical errvice for simulators.
11. RRQlJIRRMRNT:
PROJECT:
ADBQUATB:
C-17 modify simulator bays.
SUBSTANDARD:
(New Niseion)
The plus up of C-17 aircraft require additional training simulators to
RRQUIRRblRNT:
support this aircraft training mission.
CURRRNT SITKIATION:
The Air Force C-17 fleet is increasing end Altus as a primary
training base will receive additional aircraft. Additional training simulators are
required to support increased pilot production. Rxisting simulator bays require
modifications to accommdate C-17 simulators.
IMPACT IF ROT PROVIDED: Simulators are required to minimize the cost of actual aircraft
flying hours and facilities must be prepared to house simulators. Pilot production will
be adversely impacted if the facilities are not modified in order to accozmnodate the C17 simulators.
This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Handbook 32ADDITIONAL:
1004, Facility Requirements. A preliminary analysis of reasonable options for
accomplishing this project indicates there is only oue option that will satisfy
operational require4nents. therefore, a full ecoucmic analysis was not performed. A
certificate of exermption has been prepared. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Robert
NcCaugham, (580) 481-6530.
JOINT USE CRRTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other components on an "aa
available" basic, however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
164
1. COxPONmT
yY 2004 WILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT MTA
2. DATR
(ccmputer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION = I&CATIOW
4. PROJECT TITLE
ALTUS AIR PORCR RASE, ORLAECWA
C-17 WCDIFY SIWIILATCR BAYS
5. PROCXAW Ew
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJRCT NDWRRR
41130
171-212
8. PROJRCI CDST ($000)
AooNO23004
1,167
12. SUPP-AL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
* (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Ccdnplete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
02-APR-02
YES
15%
lo-SEP-02
20-AUG-03
YES
(2) Basie:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was West Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) - (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Pr&tion of Plane and Specifications
(b) All Other Deeign Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
72
36
108
96
12
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DEC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Completion
04 SEP
l
Indicates ccrmpletion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is conqarable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
ID FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
165
AIR FORCE
I
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE
ICOMMAND:
AIR FORCE MATERIEL
I
AREA CONST
S OF 30 SEP 02
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
Planned in Next Four Years Program:
(FY 2005)
2552.775
59,254
19,060
40,687
238,700
120,775
3,031,251
PROJECT TITLE
Building 3001 Revitilization, Phase 1
Cohsolidate Software Support Facility
Consolidated Fuel Overhaul, Repair,
and Test Facility
2,726 SM
8,000
141-753
ADAL Squadron Operations Facility
2,320 SM
2,400
211-111
Multipurpose 3-Bay Hangar
LS
50,000
211-152
Sheet Metal Facility
LS
28,500
Building 3001 Revitalization, Ph 2
211-157
LS
20,000
Building 3001 Revitalization, Ph 3
LS
10,000
211-157
Alter Chemical Cleaning Shop
3,020 SM
17,500
211-157
217-742
31st Combat Comm Squad Ops Fat
3.400 SM
9,700
32nd Combat Comm Squad Ops Fat
3,900 SM
217-742
8,800
33rd Combat Comm Squad Ops Fat
4,000 SM
7,800
2 17-742
Comm SqdnllT Dir ABW
10,000
LS
217-742
LS
11,500
Air Base Wing HQ / Law Center
610-I 12
Replace Building’s 4023, 4024, and
2,500
LS
61 O-249
120
RM
8,000
Dormitory
721-312
10,000
Security Forces Squadron
LS
731-835
5,000
Child Development Center
2,147 SM
737-884
Alter Primary Overhead Distribution Line 69,000 LM
13,000
812-223
2,600
8,400 LM
Extend and Upgrade Gas Mains
824-464
9c. Real Proper-y Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. Mission or Major Functions: Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center which is responsible for logistics
management, support, and depot-level maintenance, repair and overhaul of B-l, B-2, B-52, KC-135 and
aircraft and aircraft engines; an air base wing; an Air Combat Command air control wing with four E-3
airborne air control squadrons supporting 24 E-3 aircraft; an Air Force Reserve Command air refueling v
with one KC-l 35 squadron; an Air Combat Command combat communications group; and an engineerir
installation wing.
166
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
AIR FORCE MATERIEL
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE
COMMAND:
OKLAHOMA
11. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
b. Water Pollution
c. Occupational Safety and Health
d. Other Environmental
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
0.89
0
15,192
0
540
167
2 .
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. coMPoNmT
AIR FORCE
DATE
(computer generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LGCATION
4 . PRChlECI
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OICLABOMA
BUILDING 3001 REVITALIEATION, PHASE I
5. PROGRAM
ELEMENT
TITLE
6. CATBGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
72896
Auk
Approp:
wwYK033003
211-157
9.
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
COST
19,444
19,060
ESTIMATES
UNIT
BUILDING 3001 REVITALIEATION, PBASE I
COST
LS
17,600
CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURR
LS
( 4 , 3 0 0 1
MCBANICAL INFRASTRlJCTURR
LS
(
ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURB
LS
( 6 , 1 0 0 1
7,200)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
0
SUBTOTAL
17,600
CGNTINGRNCY
(
5.0
%)
880
T O T A L CONTRACl’ C O S T
18,480
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND GVBRBBAD
( 5 . 7
%)
1,053
TOTAL REQUEST
19,533
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
19,444
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (NON-ADD)
( 8 , 0 0 0 )
Description of Proposed Construction: Renovate the shop
include ventilation, structure, trench drainage, electrical,
xnqe and piping. Project aleo includes demolition, repair of
&long with aeeociated work to meet current building codes and
LO.
11. RRQUIRRMRNT:
?ROJECT:
253.712SM
ADEQUATR:
100.552 SM
Building 3001 Revitalization, Phase I.
area of Building 3001 to
lighting, fire protection,
roof, concrete flooring,
safety requirements.
SUBSTANDARD:
153,160SM
(Current Mimion)
ZBQUIREMBNT: This project ie required to provide an effective use of the existing work
apace in building 3001 to meet current and future depot workload in support of TF33,
?lOl, F108, FllO and the FlOO jet engines. Utility syetem infrastructure upgrades are
ieeded to provide a reliable source of electricity, heating and cooling for the various
!roceseee in the facility. Renovation of the existing work apace is required to improve
process flow times, enhance the working environments for compliance with the
)ccupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), provide acceeaibility for preventive and
remedial maintenance, and extend the service life of the facility. Reconfiguration of
:he Building 3001 industrial area is an element of the AFMC/OC-ALC long term Depot
strategy to improve Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDF0 proceeees and timelinee to better
mpport warfighter readinese.
QRRENT
SITUATION: Present Propulsion workload (jet engine repair, maintenance and
xrerhaul) and a significant portion of Airborne Acceeeoriee workload (both engine and
airframe accessories) is performed in building 3001. This facility is approximately 60
rears old and has utility systems that have reached their limited capacity and are in
leed of replacement. Power outages and heating and cooling failures have resulted in
lelaye in the process flow and impacted the ability of the ehope to support PDM on many
aircraft worked on at Tinker AFB, OK. Over the years the existing shop area8 have been
adjusted to accomamdate the changing workloads resulting in shops that are overcrowded
md processes that have been piecemealed together. Lack of funding hae limited the
Iffort to reconfigure and realign the existing shops in a modern and efficient procese
for engine overhaul and PDM for the KC-135 aircraft.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
168
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY C O N S T R U C T I O N
AIR FORCE
(computer
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
12896
DATA
2 . DATE
4. PROJECT TITLE
BUILDING 3001 REVITALIZATION, PHASE I
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
PROJECT
generated)
6. CATEGORY CODE
211-157
7.
PROJECT
NUMBER
wwYKo33003
8.
PROJECT
COST ($000)
19,444
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Tinker AFB'B goal to achieve effective and efficient space
utilization and work-flow/production practices will not be realized in accordance with
AF'MC/OC-ALC Long Term Depot Strategy. Working conditions will not be improved. Pereonnel
safety will be put at risk. Processes will become longer and create significant impact
to Depot long term goals.
ADDITIONAL: This project is the first phase of a ten phased effort to revitalize
building 3001. There is no criteria/scope specified for this project in Air Force
Handbook 32-1084, "Facility Requirements." The requirement for this project was
validated by the Joint Service Depot Maintenance Military Construction Review on 15 Aug
01. Base Civil Engineer: Wr. Dean Holt, (485) 734-3451. Design Build - Design Build
Cost (4% of Subtotal Cost):
$704,000.
BASE CIVIL RNGINRER:
MALLOTT
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other components on an "aa
available" basis; however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
169
1. COMPONRNT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAEOMA
BUILDING 3001 REVITALIZATION, PEASE I
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
72896
211-157
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
19,444
WWYEo33003
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Project to be accomplished by design-build procedures
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -
NO
528
(3) All Other Design Costs
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DEC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Completion
05 AU0
(7) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
YES
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
PROCURING APPRO
FISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
3010
2004
EQUIPMENT NOMENCLATURE
INITIAL OUTFITTING EQUIPMENT
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
COST
($000)
8 , 0 0 0
Page No.
170
AIR MOBILITY COMMAND
‘. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
‘otal Acreage:
3,733
nventoty Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
822,985
iuthorization Not Yet in Inventory:
\uthorization Requested in this Program:
iuthorization Included in the Following Program:
‘Ianned in Next Four Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
brand Total:
43,2OC
8,862
C
51,25f
1,8OC
928,105
(FY 2005)
1. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
aZATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
ZODE
Dormitory
‘21-213
)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
)b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
PROJECT TITLE
ZODE
Repair Airfield Pavements
111-111
Civil Engineer Complex
! 19-000
Dormitory
‘21-312
Child Development Center
740-884
Airfield Lighting Vault
311-149
IC. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS
SCOPE
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
144 RM
Sep-0:
8,863 Apr-02
Total
8,863
NONE
(FY2005)
141,071 SM
6,016 SM
144 RM
3,800 SM
1,005 SM
8,758
18,500
9,800
9,600
4,600
62
0. Mission or Major Functions: Support of two military airlift wings, one active and one reserve associate; a
lint-use airfield supporting international cargo, and general aviation operations terminals; and a remote training
lit-field simulation forward operations conditions.
1. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA Deficiencies):
a. Air pollution
0
b. Water Pollution
0
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
0
ID Form 1390,24 Jul 00
1. CamamFf
112004 lULITARYCOHSTRUCFIOAJPROJRCT
DATA
2. DATE
(computer germrated)
AIR FORCE
3.mSTALLATImvmmcATIm
4. PROJECT TITLE
amLmToHAIRFoRcRBAsR,
DoRllIToRY (144 Rx)
5.pROGRANm
souTEcARoLIuA
6. CATEGORY ODE 7. PROJECT -
41896
721-312
9.
DKFXO63001
/ Approp:
9,042
8,863
71
UNIT
COST
cosTRsTnmTRa
DORMITORY (144 RX)
Ls
DORMITORY
SW
PROTBCTIa
ANTITRRRORISHFORCE
SUPPORTING
8. P
6,518
4,752
1,335
Ls
FACILITIES
(
6,344)
( 174)
1,605
DTILITIES
Ls
( 515)
PAWS
Ls
( 292)
SITE IMP-s
Ls
( 599)
SEISHIC
Ls
( 200)
SUBTOTAG
8,123
corn-
406
'IrS.0 $1
TOTAL COSTRUT COST
SDPERvIs1oII.
8,529
IusPKTI~AmJOvEREEm
( 6.0 $1
512
TOTAL REQUEST
9.041
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUSDID)
9,042
RQDIPl4EWI FROXOTEERAPPROPIUATIONS
(NON-ADD)
( 1.400)
LO. Description of Proposed Construction:
Constructs new three-story structure with
reinforced concrete fouudation and floor slab, masonry walls, roof, and fire
protection.
Site rork to Mrwe drainage and provide appropriately landscaped n greeu
area. within the dorm campus. Includes rocmr-bath-room mod&lee, laundry rorxas, storage
md lounge areas, campus parking, and support.
Air Conditioning:
11. RRQUIREblENT:
PROJECT:
108 lcw.
899 Rw
Grade Xix: El-E4
ADEQUATE: 537RF4
144
SUBSTANDARD: 21SRM
Construct a dormitory. (Current Mission)
RRQUIRRMENT: It is a major Air Force abjective to provide unaccompanied enlisted
personnel with housing conducive to their proper rest, relaxation, and personal wall
being. Properly designed and furnished quarters providing scene dagree of individual
privacy are essential to the successful acccenpliehment of the increasingly complicated
and importapt jobs these people must perform. Private vehicle parking, landscaping, and
adequate antiterrorism/force protection measures are required to appropriately c0mplete
a new dormitory campus area/green space.
There are currently not ermugh adequate dormitories to meet the
CDRRRNT SITUATIOlp:
billeting requirements of unaccompanied enlisted personnel at this base. Eligible
unaccompanied enlisted persoPne1 in the grades of E-l through R-4 non-career, must
reside off-base. Due to the distance (15 to 30 minutes driving time) frcrm adequate
local cmmmnity housing and limited transportation, off-base housing is not attractive
nor affordable for many junior enlisted personnel.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Substandard living conditions will persist and morale,
Productivity, and career satisfaction of the enlisted force will continue to be
Failure to provide adequate living conditions will jeopardize the ability to
degraded.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. CCHPCNZNT
FY 2004 MILITARY CCNSTRUCTION PROJRCT DATA
4. PROJECT TITLE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
CEARLESTONAIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH CAROLINA
5. PROGRAM ELEldENT
41896
2. DATE
(ccmputer generated)
AIR PDRCR
6. CATEGORY CODE
721-312
IXXMITORY (144 RM)
7. PROJECT NUMBBR
DRPXO63001
8. PROJRCI COST ($000)
9.042
attract and retain the quality personnel eseential to the defense of our country and
perform DOD missions throughout the world.
ADDITIONAL:
This project meats the criteria/scope specified in OSD's new uniform
barracks size standard. All known alternatives were considered during development of
this project. No other option could meet mission requirements. Therefore, no econdc
analysis was needed or performed. Unaccoxqanied Housing RPM: FYOl - $283K, FY02 $466X.
Estimated Unaccoqanied Housing RPM: PYO3 - $35OK, PYO4 - $35OK, and FYO5 Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Dowling, (843) 963-4956. Dormitory: 4752 SX I
$45OK.
51,132 SF.
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other ccmponents on an "as
available" basis; however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requiraments.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 16
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. COWPGNKWT
PY 2004 WILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(ccmputer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.
PROJECT
TITLE
DORMITORY (144 RW)
CHARLRSTGN AIR PGRCR BASE, SOUTR CAROLINA
5. PROGRAM ELRWRWI
2. DATE
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PRGJECT NDWBRR 8. PRCIJRCI COST ($000)
41896
721-312
DRFXO63001
9,042
12. SUPP LRWENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Project to be accomplished by design-build procedures
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -
No
(3) All Other Design Costs
250
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DEC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Completion
05 JUL
(7) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
YES
b. Equipmant%sociated with this project provided from other appropriations:
RGCURING APPRO
PISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR RRQURSTRD
COST
(SOOO)
3080
2006
1,400
EQUIPWENT NOWRNCLATURR
COWPRRRENSIVR INTERIOR DESIGN
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Pags No.
174
~. COMPONENT
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
12. DATE
AIR FORCE
I
4. COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
I. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COST INDEX
AIR EDUCATION AND
;OODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE
TRAINING COMMAND
0.81
:EXAS
STUDENTS
PERMANENT
SUPPORTED
i. Personnel
ENL
OFF ENL CIV
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF
strength
4s OF 30 SEP 02
960
3226 2740
450 2909
78
1680
84
:ND FY 2007
a47
2763 2739
439 2819
78
1680
84
‘. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
1. Total Acreage:
1,002
1. Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
:. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
I. Authorization Requested in this Program:
(FY 2005)
3. Authorization Included in the Following Program:
. Planned in Next Four Years Program:
1. Remaining Deficiency:
1. Grand Total:
$. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ZATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
ZODE
Fire Training Classroom Facility
171-621
‘21-312
Student Dormitory
)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
TOTAL
12,12;7
11,44! 3
362,37! 5
(I
19,97( I
(I
39,20( I
22,00( I
443,54t 5
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS1
SCOPE
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
785 SM
1,863 Mar-02 Aug-03
200 RM
18,107 Apr-02
Sep-03
Total
19,970
(FY2005)
None
)b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
131-111
Communications Operations Complex
171-623
Intel Academic Training Facility
‘36-773
Chapel Center
3,559 SM
12,542 SM
1,680 SM
6,900
29,000
3,300
)c. Real Property Maintenance Backlog This Installation
IO. Mission or Major Functions: A training wing providing technical training in cryptology, intelligence,
inguistics, and firefighting career fields.
Il. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
0
a. Air pollution
b. Water Pollution
0
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
0
6; !
ID Form 1390,24 Jul 00
175
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. COWPONRNT
2. DATE
(cmter generated)
AIRFDRCR
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
GOODFRLLOWAIR rORCE RASE, TRYAS
FIRR TRAININg
5. PRMRAW ELRWRNT
6. CATEGORY CODR
84731
171-621
9.
7. PROJECT NUMBER
CLASSROOM FACILITY
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
JC(NO33002
COST
1,863
ESTIMATES
UNIT
Ls
FIRE TRAINING FACILITY
TRAINING FACILITY
SM
AWI'ITRRRORISW FCRCR PROTECTION
Ls
SUPPORTINa
COST
1,519
785
1,925
(
1,511)
(
FACILITIES
8)
176
Ls
Ls
Ls
Ls
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEWENTS
COWWDNICATIONS
(
suwroTArJ
96
(
40
(
28
(
12
1,695
( 5.0 %)
~ONTINOXEY
85
TOTAL CONrRAcT COST
SUPRRvISION,
1,780
INSPECTION AND Uv5MRAD
( 5.7 %)
101
TOTAL REQUEST
1,881
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
1,863
-
Description of Proposed Construction: Reinforced concrete foundation aud floor
reinforced masonry walls with brick veneer, steel frame, standing seam metal
roof system, and landscaping. Includes all utilities and force protection as required.
Pre-wire for data connectivity and video projection.
Construct covered walkway to
&cademic building. Comply with DoD interim minimum force protection construction
standard.
LO.
slabs,
75RW.
nir Conditioning:
11. RRQuIRRWRNT:
?ROJECT:
12,853SW
ADEQUATE: 12,068 SW
SUBSTANDARD:
OSM
Construct a fire training classrocmm facility. (New Mission)
The FYO3 Training Flow Management Conference (TFWC) meeting minutes
UEQUIRXMENT:
identified the firefighter apprentice course as a constrained course beginning in FY03
mcause course could not meet demauds of the field with regard to number of trained
The FY03 TPR is 1,742 while the DoD Fire Acadtwqy's maw
personnel required (TPR).
:aDacity is 1,600. In order to meet FY03 TPR, the Academy must shift from starting 2
:lasses of 10 students every 3 days (80 starts per year) to a schedule that permits
13 additional classrocms are required
-lass starts every 2 days (122 starts per year).
:o support this new schedule. Each classrm has unique, stand-alone, semi-permanent
xaining aids that students must process thru in assembly- line fashion. Classrocm
requirements are predicated on the number of class starts required to meet the TPR.
:lass starts are a function of instructor availability. The FY 03-05 TPR is an increase
>f approx 142 students with a desired optimum capacity of 2440, up 840 from current max.
--DRRRWT SITUATION: The Fire Academy is currently teaching its maximun 1,600 students
muually for all four services in 22 classrooms. Thirteen new classrooms are required
:o support this new TPR. We expect this increased student load to be a permanently
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. COMPONENT
1LIR
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PRCJRCT DATA
FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND I&CATION
4. PROJECT
3OODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
FIRE TRAINIE%3
5. PROGRAM
2.
MTE
(caaputer generated)
RLEMENT
84731
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT
171-621
TITLE
NUBIRRR
JCGUO33002
CIASSROW FACILITY
8. PROJRCT
COST ($000)
1,863
i ncreased TPR, as stated above. The firefighter career field is currently the third
most stressed field in the Air Force and firefighters are being stretched to c&er the
numerous tasking8 overseas and at ham as a result of Operation Rnduring Freedaa and
H aaelaud Security requirements.
IXPACT IF NOT PRWIDRD: If not funded the DOD Fire Academy cannot produce the number of
f irefighters the Air Force requires to meet contingency tasking8 and Hameland Defense
There is no physical way to meet the increase in production without
rrequirements.
ashutting down other mission critical training such as Weapon of Mass Destruction
t.raining for first responders, or urban search and rescue.
We are prepared to shift to
aL wartime schedule of training six days a week; however, this schedule is not
a rustainable wer the several years readred to meet the production goals.
This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Nandbook 32hDDITIONAL:
1.084, “ F a c i l i t y Requirements~. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Lance C. Iiafeli. (915) 65431464.
iroxwr USR CERTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other compxents on an as
atvailable basisi however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
177
1. COldPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CGNSTRUCTION PRGJRCT DATA
(caqn3ter generated)
AIRFORCE
2. DATE
3. INSTALLATION ARD LGCATIGN
4. PROSECT TITLR
GGCDFRLLGWAIRFGRCRRASE, TRXAS
FIRR TRAININGCLASSRGGRFACILITY
5. PROGRJM ELRMEWl'
6. CATEGORY CODE 7.
171-621
84731
12. SUPP LEMENTAL
PROJECT
NUHRKR
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
JCGUO33002
1,863
MTA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Rstimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Caaplete as of 01 JAN 2003
l (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Cauplete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle aualysis was/will be performed
lo-MAR-02
YES
15%
lo-SRP-02
lo-AUG-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Desigu (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used (3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
(4) Construction Contract
Award
No
C$OOO)
112
56
168
150
18
03 DRC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Cwletion
04 DEC
l
Indicates colqpletion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Eguipmsnt associated with this project provided frau other appropriations:
N/A
ID FORM 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
178
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
t 3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
5. PROGRAW ELBWBBT
STUDENT DORMITORY (200 RW)
6. CATEGORY CODE
85796
7.
721-312
9.
PROJECT
NUWBBR
ESTIl
PROJECT COST ($000)
Auth:
Approp:
JCGUO13002
COST
8.
18,472
18,107
TES
UNIT
COST
LLK
ITEM
SIWDENT DORMITORY (200-R&¶)
LS
13,045
SM
9,750
1,260
TRAINING MANAGER SPACE
SM
500
1,260
ABTITBRRORISM FORCE PROTECTION
LS
STUDBWTDORWITORY
(
12,285)
i
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
(
630)
(
130)
3,600
UTILITIES
LS
(
1.590)
PAVEMENTS
LS
(
1,005)
SITE IMPROvBWEWTS
LS
(
850)
COWMUNICATIONS
LS
(
155)
SUBTOTAL
16,645
,CONTINGENCY
( 5.0 %)
832
I'OTAL CONTRACT COST
17,477
SUPERVISION, INSPBCIION AWD OVBRBEAD
( 5.7 %)
996
TOTAL RBQUBST
18,473
I'OTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
18,472
3 LO.
Description of Proposed Construction: Wulti-story with reinforced concrete
1 !oundation/floor slabs, structural steel frame with brick veneer, and roof system.
1 Cncludes room-bath-room modules (two students per room), laundries, training managers
crrea, storage, comPrmnications network, and all necessary support.
Comply with DOD
i interim minimum force protection construction standards.
1iir Conditionins:
I11.
REQUIREMENT:
I ?ROJBCT:
507EW.
884RW
Grade Yix: El-B4
ADEQUATE: 647 RW
400
SUBSTANDARD: 0 RM
Construct a etudent dormitory. (Current Mission)
I ZEQUIRBWBWT:
< ,f students.
Properly sized and configured dormitories are required to eupport training
Air Force objective provides housing conducive to their proper
1rest, relaxation and personal well-being while providing a suitable study environment.
I ?roperly designed and furnished quarters providing some degree of individual privacy,
ire essential to the successful accomplishment of vital training requirements. This
Comply with DOD
xoject is in accordance with the Air Force Dormitory Waster Plan.
A major
interim minimum force protection construction standard.
The base has insufficient on-base housing to accommodate the
I ZURRBWT SITUATION:
I unaccompanied enlisted technical training students.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Adequate student living quarters wlis continue XI be
unavailable resulting in degradation of morale, productivity, and overall training
effectiveness of unaccompanied enlisted personnel. Deplorable conditions for our new
members of the Air Force have negative effects on retention and training.
ADDITIONAL: The new OSD standard does not apply to housing constructed for members
receiving entry-level skill training. This project is being designed to the Air Force
technical training dormitory construction standard. All known alternative options were
DD FORM 1391, DEC 16
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
179
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(computer
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
85796
2. DATE
generated)
6. CATEGORY CODE
721-312
STUDENT DORMITORY (200 RM)
7. PROJECT NUMBER
JCGUO13002
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
18,472
:onsidered during the development of this project. No other option could meet mission
requirements. Therefore, no economic analysis was needed or performed. FYOl
Unaccompanied Housing RPM Conducted:
$l,315K;
FYO2 Unaccompanied Housing RPM
Zonducted:
$106X.
Future Unaccompanied Housing RPM Requirements (estimated): FYo3:
illOK;
FY04 :
$113K; FY05: $116K. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Lance C. Hafeli,
1915) 654-3464. Student Dormitory:
10,250 SM = 110,290 SF.
3ASE CIVIL ENGINEER:
Van De Walle
TOINT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location
Ire incompatible with use by other components.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. COWPONEWT
-
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
STUDEWT DORMITORY (200 RW)
GOODFELLOW AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
I
I
I
6. CATEGORY CODE 17. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST ($000)
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT 1
85796
721-312
JCGUO13002
18,412
12. SUPP LEWENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l
(c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
l
(d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
lo-APR-02
YES
15%
15-SEP-02
20-SEP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (a):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
831
461
1,292
1,015
277
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DEC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Completion
05 AU0
* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391, DEC 16
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
181
AS OF 30 SEP 02
I
c. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
d. Authorization Requested in this Program:
e. Authorization included in the Following Program:
f. Planned in Next Four Years Program:
g. Remaining Deficiency:
h. Grand Total:
(FY 2005)
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
CODE
721-312
Student Dormitory
721-312
Student Dormitory
I‘
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
721-312
Student Dormitory
:9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
‘141-786
Consolidated Mobility Center
ADAL Military Working Dog Tmg Cntr
‘171-623
Base PME Center, PME Library
‘171-815
‘721-312
Dormitory
~721-312
Student Dormitory
721-312
Student Dormitory
722-351
New PP Dining Facility
730-835
Security Forces Consolidated Ops Fat
740-884
Child Development Center at LTA
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
200 RM
300 RM
Total
(FY2095)
200 RM
Total
10,223
4,731
5.500
96
200
100
2,509
3.067
3,067
SM
SM
SM
RM
RM
RM
SM
SF
SF
COST DESIGN STATUS
$.OOO
START
CMPL
20,966 Apr-02
Sep-03
35.260 Apr-02
Sep-03
56,226
21,142
21,142
14,000
5,600
10,600
7.300
19.300
10.700
5.700
7.500
5,500
64
9c. Real Property Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. Mission or Major Functions: A Training wing which includes Basic Military Training School, Air Force
Security Forces Center, and security forces, cryptographic maintenance, recruting, and Air Force and Navy
food service courses; Defense Language Institute English language Center; Department of Defense Military
Dog Training Agency; Inter-American Air Force Academy; an Air Force reserve contingency hospital and
training squadron, and a major Air Force medical center.
11. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
771
a. Air pollution
b. Water Pollution
310
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
0
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
1. cOB¶PoNmT
FY 2084 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECI DATA
AIR FORCE
DATE
2.
(ccmputer generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LACELANDAIRFORC!BBASE,
STUDENT
5. PROGRAB ELIWENT
TEEM
WRMITORY
(200
RX)
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
6. CATRGGRY CODE 7. PROJECT NDMBER
AlIti
85796
721-312
9.
MPLSO13285
COST
Approp:
21,389
20,966
ESTIMATES
UNIT
STUDENT WRBITORY (200 RFD
LS
STDDBNTDCRl4ITORY
13,863
SM
TRAINING MANAGER SPACE
ANTITBRROBISM FORCE PROTECTION
SUPPORTING
COST
9,750
1,333
500
1,333
(
12,997)
I?
FACILITIES
I
(
667)
(
200)
5,419
I
UTILITIES
LS
(
930)
PAVEMENTS
LS
(
445)
SITE IMPROvEHENT.9
LS
(
578)
CONMDNICATIONS
LS
( 275)
PIBR FODNDATION
LS
EEPANDABLBCBILl%RPLANT
SM
ASBESTOS/LBAD ABATEMENT
LS
DEMOLITION
SM
(
1,250
1,454
6,416
80
(
SUBTOTAL
460)
1,818)
(
400)
(
513)
19,282
CONTINGENCY
( 5.0 %I
964
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
20,246
SUPERVISION, INSPEmION AND OVERHEAD
1,154
( 5.7 %)
TOTAL REQUEST
21,400
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
21,389
10. Description of Proposed Construction: Multi-story with reinforced concrete
foundation/floor slabs, structural steel frame with brick veneer, and roof system.
Includes room-bath-room modules (two students per room), laundries, training managers
area, storage, conmunications network, and all necessary support. Comply with DOD
interim minimum force protection construction standard. Demolish 2 facilities (6,416
SN) .
Air Conditioning:
11. REQUIREBENT:
PROJECT:
980 KN.
1.472RM
Grade Mix: El-E4
ADEQUATE: 725
Construct a student dormitory.
400
Dl
SUBSTANDARD: 547RM
(Current Mission)
Properly sized and configured dormitories are required to support training
REQUIREBEBT:
of students. A major Air Force objective is to provide housing conducive to their
proper rest, relaxation and personal well-being while providing a suitable studey
Properly designed and furnished quarters providing some degree of
environment.
individual privacy, are essential to the successful accomplishment of vital training
This project is in accordance with the Air Force Dormitory Baster Plan.
reguirmts.
Comply with DoD interim minimum force protection construction standard.
CDRRENT SITUATION: The base has insufficient on-base housing to accommodate the
uuaccampauied enlisted technical training students.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Adequate student living quarters will continue to be
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. comoNENT
(computer generated)
4. PROJECT TITLE
I. INSTALLATION AND LCXATION
;ACKLARD AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
5.
PRCGRAMELKblKNT
85796
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
LIR FORCE
6. CATEGORY CODE
721-312
STDDENT DORMITORY (200 RM)
7. PROJECT NIDBER
KPLSO13285
8. PROJKCT COST ($000)
21,389
navailable resulting in degradation of morale, productivity, and overall training
ffectiveness of unaccompanied enlisted personnel. Deplorable conditions for new
smbers of the Air Force have negative effects on rentention and training.
DDITIONAL:
The new OSD standard does not apply to housing constructed for members
eceiving entry-level skill training. This project is being designed to the Air Force
ethnical training dormitory construction standard. All known alternative options
ncluding conversion, leasing and status quo were considered during the development of
his project. No other option could meet mission requirements. Therefore, no economic
$4,OOOK;
nalysis was needed or performed. FYOl Unaccqanied Housing RPY Conducted:
Future Unaccompanied Housing RPM
~02 Unaccompanied Housing Conducted: $2, SOOK.
equirements (estimated): FYo3:
$2,2OOK; FyO4: $1,6OOK; FYOS: $ 1 , 0 0 0 .
ase Civil Kngineer: Lt Co1 Spencer Patterson, Jr., (210) 671-2977. Student Dormitory:
,750 SM = 104.910 SF; Training Managers Area: 500 SM - 5,380 SF.
DINT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location
.re incompatiblewith use by other components.
DD FORK 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
STUDENT DORMITORY (200 RM)
5. PROGRAM ELEWEWT
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUKBER
85796
721-312
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
WPLSO13285
21,389
12. SDPP LEtdENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAW 2003
l (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Ccarplete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -
lo-APR-02
YES
15%
lo-SEP-02
15-SEP-03
YES
YES
LACKLAND
(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Prowtion of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DEC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAW
(6) Construction Coqletion
05 DEC
l
856
535
1,391
1,070
321
Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
185
1. coMPoNRNT
2. DATE
PY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(caovuter generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LGCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TRXAS
STUDENTDGRMITGRY (300 ROOMS)
5. PRGGRAM ELKKEUP
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMRKR
I
85796
I
721-312
9.
I
AWLS023721
COST
EST1
Auth:
Approp:
35.971
35,260
.TEI
-
COST
UNIT
300
0
14,625
1,333
2,177
2,448
STUDIWT DORMITORY (300 RM)
STUD= IZORMITORY
DINING FACILITY
26,406
(
19,495)
(
ANTI-TERRORISM FGRCE PRGTRCTION
TRAINING UANAGER SPACE
500
1,333
SUPPORTIM3 FACILITIES
5,329)
(
915)
(
667)
6,031
UTILITIES
Ls
PAWS
Ls
(
860)
S I T E IUPROVEURNTS
Ls
(
575)
PIER PGUNDATION
L s
(
710)
Ls
(
405)
CONUUNICATIONS
,
(
su
RXPANDASLEMILLERPLANT
1,500
1,454
(
SUBTOTAL
2,181)
32,437
C0mmKJEmY
TOTAL
1,300)
CO-T
BUPERVISION,
1,622
( 5.0 %I
COST
34,059
INSPECTION AND GVEMEAD
1,941
( 5.7 %)
I'OTAL REQUEST
36,000
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
35,971
-
Description of Proposed Construction: kulti-story facility with reinforced
:oncrete pier foundation/floorslabs, structural steel frame with brick veneer.
Cncludes room-bath-roan modules to pipeline dorm standard (two students per roam),
laundries, training managers area, storage, cc0mun ications network,
1500 pn dining
iall, ana all necessary support. Ccqply with DoD interim minimum force protection
:onstruction standard.
LO.
tir Conditioning:
11. REQUIREMENT:
?RGJRCT:
15ooRw.
1,472RM
A D E Q U A T E : 725RAl
Construct a student dormitory.
SUBSTANDARD:
547RM
( N e w Uission)
ZEQ-:
Properly sized and configured dormitories are required to support the
increased training requirement for the Security Forces Apprentice course and Basic
lfficer course. USAF directed an increase security forces pipeline production of 450
Prior to the events of 11 Sept there was a plan which included a
raduates for FYO2.
The 11
phased training schedule which increased training days from 51-days to 81-days.
;ept event increased awareness of the need for adeguate security and identified a need
:o expedite the plan on a war-time footing.
-URRRNT SITUATION: we have an urgent and compelling need to *rove security forces
:raining in support of force protections operations worldwide. Given the threat and
security forces training shortfalls it is critical this training effort be expedited on
mrtime footing to meet field coamanders force protection vulnerabilities as quickly as
mssible. Currently, the Security Forces Apprentice course is operating at Lackland APB
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page
No.
186
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
STUDKNTDORMITORY
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
85796
2. DATE
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
721-312
MPLS023721
(300
ROOMS)
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
35,971
and Camp Bullis.
The Basic Officer course is operating at Camp Bullis.
The student
1oad for the Apprentice course at Lackland is projected to be 1,601 bed spaces.
Lackland can only support an ADSL of 1008 bed spaces. This leaves a shortfall of 593
bedspaces. Construction of a 300- room (600~person) dormitory, dining hall and support
Spaces is necessary to support the increased ADSL.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Adequate on-base quarters are needed to support the Security
F 'orces Apprentice course at Lackland Air Force Base.
Lackland has insufficient on-base
h .ousing to acccumoda te these additional pipeline students. The inability to do this will
r esult in an increased cost to the Air Force for off-base housing and will *act
8 ecurity forces pipeline production and the Air Force’s ability to provide combat ready
f orces who are trained in dealing with either a homeland base defense operation or
f onvardly deployed in a hostile urban environment.
The new OSD dormitory standard does not apply to housing constructed for
l! DDITIONAL:
mmnbers receiving entry-level skill training. This project is being designed to the
A .ir Force technical training gpipelinem construction standard. All known alternatives
wrere considered during the develomnt of this project. No other option could meet
mLission requirements, therefore, no econdc analysis was needed or performed.
FYOl unaccompanied Housing RPM Conducted: $4,OOOK;
FYO2 UnacccmBmnied Housing RPM
Clonducted: $2,5OOK
-Future Unaccompanied Housing RPM requirements (estimated):
FY03r
$1,6OOK; FYO5: $l,OOOK. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Spencer
S 2,OOOK; FYo4:
P'atterson, Jr., (210) 671-2977. Student Dormitory: 14,625 SM = 157,365 SF.
9'OINT USE CERTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other ccqponents on an “as
a,vailable" basis, however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements.
L
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
187
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
(computer generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LACELAND AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
STUDENT DORMITORY (300 ROOMS)
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
85796
721-312
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
MPLSO23721
35,971
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l
(c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
l
(d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Cmlete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was West Recently Used -
04-APR-02
YES
15%
20-SEP-02
22-SEP-03
YES
YES
LAcKLAND
(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
1,439
900
2,339
1,799
540
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 JAN
(5) Construction Start
04 FEB
(6) Construction Ccnnpletion
05 DEC
l
Indicates ccanpletion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided frc%a other appropriations:
N/A
I
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
I. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE
AIR EDUCATION AND
COST INDEX
TEXAS
TRAINING COMMAND
1
0.94
PERMANENT
6. Personnel
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
OFF
ENL
CIV OFF ENL CIV
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
TOTAL
AS OF 30 SEP 02
588
2696 2653
371
4040
0
137
1792
129
12,406
END FY 2007
572
2438 2661
380
3918
0
137
1792
129
12,027
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
a. Total Acreage:
5,719
b. Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,765,299
c. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
53,000
d. Authorization Requested in this Program:
28,590
e. Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
21,284
f. Planned in Next Four Years Program:
164,600
g. Remaining Deficiency:
39.000
h. Grand Total:
2,071,773
-I
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
(FY 2004)
CATEGORY
COST DESIGN STATUS
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
$.OOO
START
CMPL
-~
721-312
Student Dormitory
300
RM
28,590 Apr-02
Sep-0:
Total
28,590
9a. Future Projects: Inclided in the Following Program:
(FY2005)
171-625
F-22 Technical Training Facility
11,368 SM
21,284
Total
21,284
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
113-321
Base Operations Ramp
40,067 SM
7,200
141-453
Airfield Ops Center
2,366 SM
9,000
171-627
Repl Trainer Maim/Development Facility 10,688 SM
20,000
171-627
Training Support Facility
5,575 SM
10,500
721-312
Dormitory
144 RM
10,600
721-312
Student Dormitory
300 RM
31,700
721-312
Student Dormitory
300 RM
33,200
721-312
Student Dormitory
300 RM
28,100
740-884
Child Development Center
3,500 SM
14,300
44
9c. Real Property Maintenance Backlog This Installation
IO. Mission or Major Functions: A Training wing responsible for aircraft maintenance, civil engineering,
comptroller, and health science courses; a flying training wing with T-37/T-38/AT-38 flying training
squadrons that train US and NATO pilots under the Euro-NATO Joint Jet pilot Training (ENJJPT) Program;
and an Air Force Reserve Command flying training squadron.
11. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
175
b. Water Pollution
350
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
0
DD Form 1390, 24 Jul 00
189
1. COMPONRNT
(computer generated)
3. INSTALLATION
4. PROJECT
AND LOCATION
6. CATEGORY
PROGRAMRLRMRNT
85796
TITLE
STUDY DORNITORY ( 3 0 0 R N )
SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE, TRXAS
5 .
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJBC'I DATA
AIR FORCE
CODE 7. PROJECT NDMRRR
9.
AUthZ
Approp:
VNVPO53002
721-312
COST
8. PROJRCI COST ($000)
ESTIMATES
UNIT
WTJDENT DORHITORY (300 RM)
SN
ANTITRRRORISM FORCR PROTECTION
LS
COST
21,041
LS
STlJDRNTDORXITORY
SUPPORTING
29,167
28,590
14.625
1,425
( 2 0 , 8 4 1 )
(
200)
5,260
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
LS
( 1.700)
PAWS
LS
( 1 , 4 7 0 )
SITE IMPROVRblRNTS
LS
( 1,440)
COZWDNICATIONS
LS
(
650)
26,301
SUBTOTAL
CONTINOENCY
$5.0
1,315
$1
27,616
TOTAL CONl'RACT COST
SDPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERBEAD
(
5.7
%)
1,574
TOTAL RZQUEST
29,190
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
29,167
LO. Description of Proposed Construction: Multi-story with reinforced ooncrete
Eouudation/floor slabs, structural steel frame with brick veneer, and roof syetemr.
Includes room-bath-room modules (two students per room), laundries, training managers
area, storage, cozzwnicatione network, and all necessary support. ComplywithDoD
.nterim minimum force protection conetruction etandard.
65OKW.
tir Conditioning:
Ll. RRQUIRRNRNT:
'ROJECT:
2,530RM
Grade Mix: El-R4
ADEQUATE: 37OFtM
300
SUBSTANDARD: 2,264RM
Construct a student dormitory. (Current Mistzion)
Properly sized and configured dormitories are required to support training
WQUIRRbIRWI:
>f students. A major Air Force objective is to provide housing conducive to their
xoper rest, relaxation and personal well-being while providing a suitable study
Properly designed and furnished quarters, providing Bome degree of
3nviromaent.
individual privacy, are essential to the eucceeeful accozpliehment of vital training
requirements. This project is in accordance with the Air Force Dormitory Master Plan.
:ozply with DOD interim minimum force protection construction standard.
WRRRNT
SITUATION: Four of the eleven student dormitories at Sheppard have central
Latrine8 and are in deteriorated condition. They are plagued by broken toilets, einks,
Severe moisture and mildew problemur are creating health
3ewer , and water lines.
Frequent electrical power outages cause damage to personal property euch as
lazarde.
:elevisione and computers. Severe heat and cooling inconsistencies, exacerbated by the
inability to open windows contribute to stifling conditions for personal etudiee.
Adequate student living quarter6 will continue to be
CNPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
unavailable reeulting in degradation of morale, productivity, and overall training
affectivenees of unaccompanied enlisted personnel. Deplorable conditions for new members
>f the Air Force have negative effects on retention and training.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer generated)
PIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
STUDENT DOPXITORY (300 RM)
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
85796
6. CATEGORY CODE
721-312
7. PROJECT NUUBER
VNVPO53002
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
29,167
The new OSD dormitory standard does not apply to housing conetructed for
DDITIONAL:
embers receiving entry-level skill training. This project is being designed to the Air
'orce technical training "pipeline' construction etanderd.
All known alternatives were
oneidered during the development of this project. No other option could meet mieeion
Therefore, no economic enalyeie was needed or performed. FYOl
equiremente.
haccompanied Homing RPM Conducted:
FYOZ Unaccolnpanied Housing RPM
$3,76OK;
Future Unaccompanied Housing RPM Requirements (estimated): PYo3:
$855K.
'onducted:
$9433; FYOS: $99OK. Base Civil Engineer: Co1 Hal M. Tinsley. (940)
FYo4:
9893;
76-2158.
lormitory: 14,625 SM = 157,365 SF
rOINT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational coneideratione, and location
me incompatible with use by other coqmnente.
FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1. coBfPCNRm
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CCNSTRUCYION PRCJRCT DATA
(computer generated)
AIR FCRCR
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
SHEPPARD AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
STUDBNT DORMITORY (300 RM)
5. PROGRAM ELRbXRNT
6. CATROORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
85796
721-312
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
VNVPO53002
29,167
12. SUPP LRMRNTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Eetimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
l (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Waae Most Recently Used -
OZ-APR-02
YES
15%
zo-SEP-02
ZO-SEP-03
YES
YES
SHEPPARD
(3) Total Cost (c) - (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Prodktion of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
1,168
730
1,898
1,460
438
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DRC
(5) Construction Start
04 JAN
(6) Construction Completion
05 NOV
* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% deeign to ensure valid mope.
cost and executability.
b. Eguipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
COMPONENT
12. DATE
AIR FORCE
I
ICOMMAND:
USTALLATION AND LOCATION
15. AREA CONST
AIR FORCE MATERIEL
COST INDEX
IILL AIR FORCE BASE,
COMMAND
1.04
JTAH
STUDENTS
PERMANENT
SUPPORTED
i. Personnel
CIV
OFF ENL CIV
OFF ENL
ENL
itrength
OFF
CIV
TOTAL
4229 9919 3488 4702
627
937
1
0
rS OF 30 SEP 02
803
24,701
4230 9525 3488 4702
.ND FY 2007
608
937
1
0
803
24,29
‘. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
6,973
-otal Acreage:
nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
2,902,09
iuthorization Not Yet in Inventory:
64,291
iuthorization Requested in this Program:
15.81
\uthorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
13,11:
‘Ianned in Next Four Years Program:
186,201
iemaining Deficiency:
72,151
brand Total:
3,253,66
1. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
(FY 2004)
:ATEGORY
COST DESIGN STATUS
PROJECT TITLE
=ODE
SCOPE
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
Munitions Maintenance Facility
!I 5554
LS
$1,000 Design-Build
122-264
Replace Munitions Storage Igloos, Ph I 4,059 SM
13,000 Design-Build
122-264
Small Diameter Bomb Storage Igloos
1,811 Design-Build
15,811
3a. Future Projects: Inclided in the Following Program:
740-674
Fitness Center
580
SM
Total
(p/2005)
6.000 SM
Total
3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
Consolidated Fire/Crash Rescue Station 4,737 S M
130-142
141-753
F-16 Squadron Operations Facility
2,600 SM
Consolidated Software Support Facility, 6,735 SM
141-764
Phase 1
141-765
Consolidate Quality Control Propellant 2,220 SM
Lab
Consolidated AEF Deployment Center
141-786
5,112 SM
2,020 SM
Consolidate CLSS Training I Storage
171-625
Facility
5,500 SM
Fueled Hangar Facility
!ll-116
Maintenance Hangar, 4 dock, Phase 2 10,077 SM
!ll-116
2,454 SM
Consolidated Industrial Commodities
!I I-152
Aircraft Structural Maintenance Facility 830
SM
!ll-152
7,350 SM
Composite Repair Facility, Phase 1
!ll-152
2,710 SM
Composites RCS Facility
!12-212
1,700 SM
729th ACS OperationIMaint Complex
t14-425
2,850 SM
Munitions Maintenance Facility
,I 5-552
3,535 SM
Consolidate Missile Storage Facilities
522-259
Replace
Munitions
Storage
Igloos,
Ph
I
4,059 SM
122-264
2,050 SM
Consolidated 649th Munitions Facility
510-144
96
RM
Dormitory
721-312
13.113
13,113
9,200
6,000
19,000
6,500
5,700
3,800
13,000
32,000
4,500
2,200
24,500
10,600
4,900
4,500
14,200
13,000
4,600
8,000
9:
3c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
IO. Mission or Major Functions: Ogden Air Logistics Center which is responsible for logistics management,
jupport, and depot-level maintenance of tactical missiles, F-16 aircraft, Minuteman and Peacekeeper ICBMs,
I\N/FPS-117 Radar, Composite (including B-2 Composites), Power Systems, and Software workload; a test
squadron with F-16, HH-1, MH-60, and HCINC-130 aircraft; an air base wing; an Air Combat Command
ighter wing with three F-16 squadrons; and an Air Force Reserve fighter wing with one F-16 squadron.
193
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
HILL AIR FORCE BASE,
UTAH
COMMAND:
AIR FORCE MATERIEL
ICOMMAND
11. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
b. Water Pollution
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
1
1.04
1,000
120
c. Occupational Safety and Health
I
d. Other Environmental
0
I
194
l.coHeoNEwT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PRChJECT DATA
2. DATE
(caaputer generated)
IUR FORCS
3. INSTALLATICM AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
aILLxLRFoRcBBmE,uTAIi
NUNITIONS V FACILITY
5. PROGRAM -
6.CATEGORYCODE
7.PROJECT=ER
215-554
27248
9.
8. PROJBCT COST ($000)
RRSMO23011
1,000
COST EBTMTES
UNIT
COST
o/K-
I!mm
KINITIONS m FACILITY
3UPPORTING FACILITIES
Ls
1,000
0
3uBToTAL
1,000
lDTAL Coarmucr COST
mAL REQUEST
1,000
1,000
rOTAIn I=QU=T (R-)
1,000
.o .
Description of Proposed Construction:
.l.REQj:
-:
=QL
ADEQUATE: Ls
LB
Ata required.
: Det+ls Under Separate Cwer.
D SI'RXZLTIONr
special access requuird.
3LpAcTIFmTPmvIDED:
DD
Special access required
SuBsTANmNDt Ls
DEC 76
Special access required.
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
195
l.cOMPONmT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIRFORCE
2. DATE
(computer generated)
3. INSTAILATI~ AND LOCATIOU
4. PRCJRCT TITLE
HIx&xmFoRcwBAsE,DTAH
REPIACE MURITIOEW STORAGR IGLOOS
5.
PROGRAW
-
6. CATHIORY CODR 7. PROJECT MIIIBRR
422-264
72896
9.
8. PROSECT COST ($000)
RRSM003013
COST
13,000
RSTIWATES
REPLACE NtJNITIOW m IgLOOS
SUPPORT- yACILITIRS
UTILITIRS
PAWS
SITS -s
DWOLITIOR
-CATIOUS WPPORT
LO. Description of Proposed Constructicmr Construct 21 earth covered reinforced
mncrete Hayman Type igloos, 26' x 80', capable of storing 500,000 pounds of Class 1.1
nunitions. work includes access roads, reinforced aprons, utilities and other
necessary support. ~emrolish seven facilities totaling 2,069 SR.
ll.RRQpJRumRm:
41,168SN
ADEQUATE: 21,505 SM
SDBSTAUDERD:
20,519SM
Replace Munitions Storage Igloos. (current M.ission)
: Properly sired and configured munitions storage facilities are required to
wasupport the increased Standard Air Wunitions Packages (STAMP) mission for Precision
radded Munitions (PcpI) assets. The AF Ammmition Control Point and the Air Staff have
STAW
designated the additional STAMP requireman t8 to be accamaoda tedat Hill AFB.
assets are war reserve munitions (WRN) required by all Combat Air Forces (Cnr) involved
inanytype of coutingencyrorlduide. This project is needed to provide safer and more
efficient exglosives handling aud storage capabilities and increase storage capability
within the existing explosive safety footprint. These igloos must be capable of storing
500,000 Rounds Ret Rquivaleut Weight (NSW) of class 1.1 explosives.
PRCJRCT:
CgRREWf SITUATION: Existing igloo configurations are inadequate to actcamdate the new
munitions being shipped as full up rounds. Uew containers are much larger and will not
fit through the existing doors without extensive maneuvering. The current igloo shape
and size do not allow for the most efficient use of space to maneuver and store the
3TAMP aSSetS. gxisting aud plauued construction for other missions in the explosives
storage area have restricted the RRW that can be stored in the various existing igloos
M reduced the bases ability to store hazard class 1.1 munitions by 2.8 million pounds.
blew, modern igloos prcvide additional storage space and allow an increase of 1.5
nillion pounds of class 1.1 munitions to be stored within the existing explosive safety
This project is the key element to the overall revitalization and
Ewtprint.
levelopmnt of the munitions storage area at Hill AFR.
DD FORM
1391,
DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Pags No.
1. CauPom
FY 2004 HILITARY BIOBl
AIRFORCE
(wter
P R O J E C T
DATA
2 . DATE
generated)
3 . IBlSTN&&TIW AUD LOCATION
4. PROJECT
HILLAIRmmcl3BA(A,
REP- NUUITIOUS S- IGLOOS
5 . PROGRAW
.72896
UTAH
6.
*
CATEGORYCOm
7 .
422-264
TITLZ
PROJECT-
8 .
PROJBCT C O S T ($000)
lmmloo3013
13rooo
There will continue to k a nhortfall of storage capability for
IMPACTIFM)T~:
hazard class 1.1 munitions. lkcesdve maneuvering of asseta in and out of the existing
igloos will continue to place these amets and crew at rink. Imdequate storage
capability will impact the m of new sunitions at Kill h?B and will have a
significant negative impact ca4 STAMP assets availability to wrt Ws involved in
contingency operations worldwide.
NJDITIOMN,r This projects mtn the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Xamlbook 32All known alternative options were considerrd&urLng the
1084, "Facility Requirements.m
ilevelapment of this project. rJootheroptioncouldmeetthem.isaion requirements;
therefore, no econcdc anelymia raa needed or performed. A certificate of exception has
Base civil mgineert Co1 Wea Somers (801) 777-3071. Munitions Storage
been Prepared.
Igloos: 4,059 8X = 43,680 SI. Design Build - Design Build Cost (4% of Subtotal Cost):
$465,000.
JOINT
USI8
CERTI~ICATIOU:
This f a c i l i t y cau b e used b y O t h e r c-ante
available. basisi however, the scope of the
project is
baeed
on
o n a n “as
Air Force requireemnts.
l -
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obSOlet6.
Page No.
197
l.CONPO~
M 2004 UILITARY COUSTRUCTIOU PROJECT MTA
(canputer generated)
AIRmRcE
2. DATE
3. IUSTALLATIOU m LOCATIOU
4. PROJECT TITLE
HILLAIRFoRcEHasE,uTAH
REPWCE HDUITIOUS SMRAaE IQLOOS
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROZECT MJ#BKR 8. PROJSCT COST ($000)
5.PRmm
422-264
72896
12. SUPP-AL
KRSHoo3013
13,000
MTA:
a. Ihstimated Design Data:
(1) Project to be accce@ished by design-build procedures
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Nest Recently used -
uo
(3) All Other Design Costs
(4) Construction Contract
348
Award
03 DEC
(5) Constxuction start
04 mu
(6) construction Cwleticm
05 WAY
(7) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be
performed
uo
b. Equipment apociated with this project provided from other appropriations:
U/A
FORM
1391, DEC 76
Previous editions ar6 obsolete.
Page No.
198
r
l.cCWPoNENT
FY 2004 WILITARY CCNSTRtlCTIOW PRCUECT DATA
2. DATE
(ccmputer generated)
AIRFORCF,
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PRCJECT TITLE
EILLAIRFORCE
SWALLD IAmTERBoWB.sToRAm18LoDS
BASE,DTAB
5. PROQRAM m
6. CATEQIJRY CODE 7. PROJBCT NCWBER
8. PR- COST ($000)
Auth:
27327
422-264
9.
RRSWo33005
&prop:
1,848
1,811
COST ESTIWATES
UUIT
COST
U/&WTY
8WALLDIAWBTER~STORAGEIOUX)S
EUPPORTINQ FACILITIES
SN
DTILITIBS
580
Ls
PAWS
4
Ls
Ls
SITE IWPRwEbIEMPS
CCAMWICATIOWS SDPPORT
2,327
1,350
315
( 90)
( 115)
( 90)
(
20)
3uBToTAL
1,665
zouTIuQmeY
( 5.0 %)
I'OTAL CoNpRAcT COST
83
1,748
57JPERVISION, INSPECTICBI AND OVERBEAD
( 5.7 %)
100
L'OTAL REQUEST
1,848
roTAL REQWST (RaoluDED)
1,848
.o. Description of Proposed Construction: Coustruct 3 earth covered reinforced
:oncrete Hayzuan Type igloos, 26' x EO', capable of storing 500,000 paunds of Class 1.1
unitions. Work includes access roads, reinforced aprons, utilities aud other
mcessary support.
ADEQUATE: 21,505 SN
41,748SW
SUBSTANDARD: 20,519SW
.l. REQIJ1REWBWT:
'RCUECT: Construct small diameter baab (SDB) storage igloos. (New Mission)
u3QlJIREWEWT: Properly sized sud configured munitions storage facilities are reguired to
upport the new Standard Air Wuuitions Packages (STAMP) mission for SDB assets. The AF
uazuuition Control Point and the Air Staff have designated the STAMP reguirmmuts to be
tcccuzmdated at Hill AFB. STAWP assets are war reserve munitions (WRW) required by all
:w&at Air Forces (W) involved in many types of coutingencies worldwide. Separate
structures are required to support single Point load out locations to meet STAWP
:ontingency support and to provide safe and efficient exDlosives handling and storage
:aPabilities within the existing qlosive safety footprint. These igloos zzz3t be
:apable of storing 500,000 Pounds Wet Eqlosives Weight (WEW) of Class 1.1 explosives.
The SDB is an ACC neu mission requirement. SDB STAMP assets are
'URREWT SITUATION:
tackaged in a pre-loaded configuration inside a ll-foot long container as uell as
udividual bcmbs. The existing igloos are not the correct size or shape to efficiently
mxamodate the new assets. III addition, the existing igloos are utilized to their
ksxhum capacity. Existing and planued construction Project5 for other missions within
he explosive storage area are part of au overall master plan to increase the storage
rapability for Class 1.1 munitions within the existing explosives safety footprint.
lithout the plauued changes there is insufficient capacity for the current workload and
LO cagability to acccemodate new mi55ions assigned to Hill AFB.
HPACT IF NCT PROVIDED: Failure to Provide adequate SDB storage facilities would result
.n costly prOdUCtiOn and fielding delays. Additionally, the SDB would not be izuuediately
.vailable to warfighters if STAMP storage facilities are not provided.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
(1.cuMPoNKNT
(
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
(cclqputer generated)
AIRFORCE
3. INSTALIATION AM) LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
HILLAIRFORCE
swALLDIAwETRR BmxSsToRAGR1QLooS
RASE,UTAR
5. PROGRAM D
27327
6. CATEQORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUWEER
422-264
RRm033005
8. PROJECT COST ($000,
1,848
ADDITIONAL: This projects meets the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Eandbook 321084, "Facility Requiremrents."
pase Civil Eagiaeer: Co1 We8 Saner8 (801) 777-3071.
SDE Storage Igloos: 580 SM = 6,240 SF. Demign Build - Design Build Cost (4% of
Subtotal): $68,586.
JOIWT USE CERTIFICATION: This facility can be used by other canponents on an "as
available" basis; however, the scope of the project is based oa Air Force requirements.
DD PORN 1391. DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROCIBCT DATA
1. CoHPoNENT
(computer generated)
AIRFORCR
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PRO4-RCT TITLE
EILLAIRFORCERASE,UTAE
SM?LLLDW BOzmsTORA~IQLQOS
5. PROGRAM -
6. C!.ATEQORY CODR
7. PROJ'ECT. NUMRRR
422-264
RRSMo33005
27327
8. PROJ'RCT COST ($000)
1,848
12. SUPP -AL DATA:
a.
Estimeted
(1)
Project
Design
Data:
to be accanplished by design-build procedures
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Bbst Recently Used -
No
(3) All Other Design Costs
52
(4) Construction Contract Award
03 DE!
(5) Construction Start
04 SAN
(6) Construction Completion
04 Nov
(7) Rnergy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
YES
b. Rquiplaent associated with this project provided frmn other appropriations:
N/A
DD
FORM
1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
201
AIR FORCE
I
I
3. INSTALlATlON AND LOCATION
4. COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE,
VIRGINIA
0.94
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
ENL
CIV
ENL
CIV
OFF
OFF
ENL
StMigtll
OFF
CIV
TOTAL
AS OF 36 SEP 02
1853
6819
1717
117
304
20
243
11,073
END FY 2697
1912
6839
1655
117
394
20
243
11,099
7. INVENTORY DATA ($990)
a. Total Acreage:
3,152
b. Inventory Total as of : (39 Sep 02)
1,296,235
c. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory
172,999
d. Authorizatfon Requested in this Program:
24,969
e. Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(I7 2995)
6,292
f. Planned in Next Four Years Program:
42,796
g. Remaining Deficiency:
63,296
h. Grand Total:
1,517,398
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
u=Y 2004)
CATEGORY
COST DESIGN STATUS
PROJECT TlTLE
8.999
START
CMPL
SCOPE
4,196 SM
116-672
F-22 Clear Water Rinse Pad
2,383
Jun-92
Sep-93
6,891 SM
211-111
F-22 Squadron OperatinsAMUMangar
20,013
Jun-92
Sap-03
1,486 SM
218-712
2,573
May-62
Sep-03
F-22 Vertical Wing Tank Storage
Total
24,989
(FY2995)
9a. Future Projects: Included In the Following Program:
96RM
8,292
721512
Dom W-(96 RN,,
,,‘$
Total
8,292
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Ne$‘Four Years:
154,858 SM
11,799
113-321
Repair Primary Parking ApronITaxiway
102,999 SM
15.000
113-321
Repair West Parking ApronITaxiway
2,778 SM
5,866
171-475
Indoor Small Arms Range
96 RM
7,200
721-312
Dormitory (95 RM)
358 SM
3,990
736-771
ADAL Bethel Manor Chapel
75
9c. Real Property Maintenance Backlog This Installation:
10. Mission or Major Functions: Headquarters Air Combat Command; a fighter wing with three F-l 5 fighter squadrons; an airlift flight; an
intelligence group; Aerospace Command and Control lntellii, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Center (ACPISRC), Detachment of
the USAF Doctrine Center; and the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center.
11. Outstanding Pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
b. Water Pollution
c. Occupational Safety and Health
d. Other Environmental
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. COMPONENT
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
4. PROJECT TITLE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
F-22 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMU/RANGAR
LANGLRY AIR PORCR RASE, VIRGINIA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. GATRGORY CODE
27138
7. PROJECT NUMRER
211-111
9.
PROJECT COST ($000)
Auth:
Approp:
MURJO43001
COST
8.
20,418
20,013
ESTIMATES
?-22 SQUADRON OPRRATIONS/AHlJ/RANGAR
LS
SQUADRON OPRRATIONS/AMU
SM
2,641
1,424 /
(
3,761)
HANGAR
SM
4,250
1,296 )
(
5,509)
ANTITERRORISM PORCR PROTRCTION
LS
SUPPORTING
(
!
FACILITIES
46)
9,070
LS
(
3,010)
LS
(
2,026)
DRMOLITION
LS
(
SPECIAL FOUNDATIONS
SM
PASSIVE SEcURITYMRASURRS
LS
SOIL RBMRDIATI&
LS
UTILITIES
PAWS/SITE
: ,
IBIPROYSRRNTS
2,550
1,483)
190 )
I
(
iwToTAL
(
485)
(
415)
1,651)
18,385
ZONTINGmCY
(
5.0 %I
919
L'OTAL CONTRACT COST
19,305
IUPERVISION, INSPECX'ION AND OVERHEAD
(
5.7 %)
YOTAL REQUEST
!OTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
~UIPMRNT FROM OTRRR APPROPRIATIONS (NON-ADD)
.O.
1,100
-
20,405
I
I
20,418
(
21.0)
Description of Propoeed Coaetruction: Construct F-22 squadron opera:ions/AMU
angar to include special foundation pilings, masonry block walls and standing seam
metal roofs. The infrastructure and the utilities will be upgraded. Includes minumum
oD force protection measures.
15oRw.
.ir Conditioning:
.l. RRQUIRRWRNT:
'ROJRCT:
7,923 816
ADEQUATE: 0 SM
.’ I
SUBSTANDARD: 6,458SU
Construct P-22 squadron operations/AMD and hangar.
(New Missic 1)
XQUIREWRNT: The F-22 squadron operations/AMU and hangar is required to .;upport the
'eddown of the F-22. New technology and composite materials for stealth rdssion
apability require specialized maintenance facilities that do not compromise security
The facility will support personnel and equipment due to arrive in Mar 06
lrocedures.
nd aircraft scheduled to arrive in Dee 06 for the third F-22 squadron.
QRRRNT SITUATION: The base does not have adequate facilities to conduct squadron level
Over the last '.~n years, the
maintenance and operations for the F-22 fighter squadron.
,ir Force has experienced significant restructuring of its combat wings, I-ssulting in
he shifting of roles aad responsibilities for maintaining and operating aircraft.
perational squadrons are required to work, train, deploy, and fight in c‘ose
Currently, s luadron
ooperation with their corresponding maintenance functions.
perations and maintenance facilities are geographically separated, under ;-:oed, in poor
ondition, and not configured to support high operations tempo fighter sq:adrons. The
xisting hangars are over 70 years old. Hangar door; do not operate prop :,y, roofs
FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions arc-
I‘age No.
203
/
1. CmPoNRm
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRDCTION PROJRCT DATA
AIRFORCE
2. MTR
(canputer generated)
3. INSTAUATIWANDLOCATION
4. PROJRCT TITLE
LANgIRYAIRFORCERASE, VIRGINIA
F-22 SQUADRON o&RAmnU?/;luro/RANSAR
5. PROGRAM m
6. CATRQORY CODE 7. PRoJecT NDMSRR
211-111
27138
9.
8 -wmEcT COST (8000)
Auth:
APP~P:
mlBI043001
20,4 18
20,013
COST ESTIMAm
COST
WIT
ll.QLm
F-22 SQUADRON OPRRATIONS/AMU/RANGAR
Ls
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMJ
ANTITRRRORISMFORCR
SN
PROTECTION
9,316
2,641
1,424
( 3,761)
4,250
1,296
( 5,509 )
(
,"I
EUPPORTINQ FACILITIES
46)
9,070
DTILITIRS
PAWS/SITE IMP-S
-LITION
SPECIAL FODNDATI~
PASSIVE SEIJRITY B8zAsmEs
SOIL RRMRDIATI&
Ls
Ls
Ls
SN
Ls
Ls
( 3,010)
( 2,026)
( 1.483)
( 485)
( 415)
( 1.651)
190 1
2,550
8uBmTAL
18,385
919
CoNr( 5.0 %)
IWI'AL CZOWPRACT COST
¶PRRVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD
19,305
1,100
( 5.7 %I
POTAL REQDRST
20,405
L'OTAL RFQDEST (RODNDQ)
EQDI~FROMOTSRRAPPROPRIATIONS
20,418
( 21.0 )
(NDN-ADD)
LO. Description of Proposed Construction: Construct F-22 squadron operations/Am
xangar to include special foundation pilings, masonry block walls and standing seam
metal roofs. The infrastructure and the utilities will be upgraded. Includes roinumum
3oD force protection measures.
4ir
Conditioning:
11. RRQuIRmmWr:
?ROJECT:
1soRw.
7,923 SN
ADEQUATR:
OSN
SUEzSTANDARD:
Construct F-22 squadron operations/AMU and hangar.
6,458SM
(New
Mission)
3EQUIREMEEsT: The F-22 squadron operations/AMU and hangar is required to support the
mddowa of the F-22. New technology aud canposite materials for stealth mission
:apability require specialized maintenance facilities that do not canpromise security
wocedures . The facility will support personnel and equipment due to arrive in Nar 06
md aircraft scheduled to arrive in Dee 06 for the third F-22 squadron.
WRRRNT
SITUATION: The base does not have adequate facilities to conduct squadron level
naintenaace and operations for the F-22 fighter squadron. O v e r t h e l a s t t e a y e a r s , t h e
iir Force has errperienced significant reStmCtUring of it8 ccmbat Wings, reSUltiW in
he shifting of roles and responsibilities for maintaining and operating aircraft.
-rational squadrons are required to work, train, deploy, aud fight in close
moperation with their corresponding maintenance functions. currently, squadron
operations and maintenance facilities are geographically separated, undersized, in poor
:onditioa, aud not configured to support high operations tempo fighter squadrons. The
uristing hangars are over 70 years old. Hangar doors do not operate properly, roofs
DD PORN 1391, DFJZ 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
1.
CoNPoNmT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCR
3. INSTALLRTICM AND LOCATION
4.
LAIWLRYAIRFORCRRASE, VIRGINIA
F-22
5.
2. DATE
(canputer generated)
PROGRAM RLEMRNT
27138
6.
CATRgORY CODE
211-111
PROJECT
TITLE
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMtl/RANGM
7. PROJECT NDNRRR
MuEJo43001
8.
PROJ'RCT COST ($000)
20,418
.eak, lead paint and asbestos are present, lighting is substandard, mechanical and
electrical systems are inadequate, exterior masonry walls are deteriorating, aud fire
m-otection aad security systa are non-existent. Also, the hangars are inadequately
bized aad *raperly configured to actamodate the wider F-22 aircraft without violating
safety criteria.
~ACTIFNOTPROVIDRD:
Adequate facilities will not be available to perform essential
nainteuauce and reDair ou the F-22 aircraft. Operational squadrons will be undersized
md geographically separated frcan the maintenance functions, creating aperatioual
leficiencies. Ragmented operations will increase the Dotential for security
:aqwanises . With no acceptable work-arounds, high risk solutions will be *l-ted,
impacting aperational capabilities aud violating safety criteria.
LDDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria and scope outlined in Air Force Handbook
32-1084, "Facility RequirWts". A preliminary analysis of reasonable aptions for
m=anDlishing this project (status quo, renovation, upgrade/remroval, new construction)
oas done. It i.nd+ates there is only one aption that will meet aperational
A certificate Of mC&XDtion ha8 been Drepered.
Ease Civil Eugineer: Lt
requirmnmts.
Squadron Operations/ANW/Rangar: 2,641SM = 28,417
201 Neal NcElhannon, (757)-764-2025.
SF; Ranger:
4,250 SN = 45,730 SF.
JOINT USE CRRTIFIcATICRl: Mission reguirmmnts, operational considerations, and
ire incauDatible with use by other cwents.
76
Previous editions are obsolete.
location
Page No.
1. CWPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRDCTION
2. MTR
PROJRCT DATA
(cvter generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTAIJATION AM) LOCATION
4. PROJRCT TITLE
LANGIRY AIR FORCR RASE, VIRGINIA
F-22 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AARJ/~
5. PROGRAM ELEMwlT
6. cATEo0RY c0DE 7. pRo;IEcT NmmR
12. 8DPPI
PROJRCT
MuSJ043001
211-111
27138
8.
COST
($000)
20,418
M T A :
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
* (c) Percent Cwlete as of 01 &AN 2003
* (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Cauplete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
lo-JON-02
YES
15%
01-AIJG-02
Ol-SRP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design -
No
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used (3)
Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
(4) Construction Contract
($000)
1,225
613
1,838
1,532
306
04 JAN
Award
(5) Construction Start
04 FE8
(6) Construction Completion
06 N?dt
* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is c-arable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. RguiInaeut associated with this project provided frau other appropriations:
APPROPRIATION
FISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATED
ORREQDRSTRD
3400
2004
PROCURIIW
RQUIPMRNT NoNNNcLATuRE
CONMDNICATIONS FQDIPMEWI
DD FORM 1391, DRC! 76
Previous ea~rlons are omsorece.
(EL
21
rage NO.
206
1. COWPORBRT
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCIION PROJECT DATA
(computer generated)
AIR FORC8
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT
LANGLEYAIBFORCEBASE,
F-22 VERTICAL WING TANR STORAGE
5. PROGRAW
m
VIRGINIA
6. CATEGORY
TITLE
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
CODE 7. PROJECT M.BdBER
Auth:
27138
mHJ043003
218-712
9.
COST
Approp:
2,625
2,573
ESTINATES
VERTICAL WING TANR STORAGE
F-22 VERTICAL WING TANE STORAOE FACILITY
( 2,297 )
ANTITERRORISW FORCE PROTRWION
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
DTILITIES
PAVEBENTS
SITE IWPROvE16ENTS
-CATIONS
SUPPORT
SUBTOTAL
coNTINGENcY
cm.0 %I
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERE8AD
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
10. Description of Proposed Construction: Construct external aircraft fuel tank
storage facility with masonry siding and standing seam metal roof. Includes minimum
DoD standard force protection measures.
11. RBQUIRRWENT:
PROJECT:
1,486SW
ADEQUATE: 0 SY
SUBSTANDARD: 0 SM
Construct vertical wing tank storage facility.
(New Mission)
REQOIREWEWT:
An adequately sized and configured facility is required for the storage
and maintenance of 320 F-22 external wing tanks as part of the F-22 beddown. This
facility will house the external aircraft fuel tank storage system (RAETSS) that is
being used on the new F-22 aircraft.
CURRRRT SITUATION: Langley AFB does not currently have a facility that is adequate in
In addition, the
size or a building that can be converted to support this requirement.
existing horizontal wing tank storage pad currently violates airfield criteria creating
unacceptable risks and a flight safety hazard. Furthermore, this external storage is
unacceptable due to the high corrosive nature of Langley AFB being located near the
Atlantic Ocean.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Langley AFB will be unable to store and maintain critical wing
tanks as required for the F-22 aircraft. Wing tanks will continue to have corrosive
problems due to the salt water environment.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria and scope outlined in Air Force Handbook
A preliminary analysis of reasonable options for
32-1084, "Facility Requirementsw.
accomplishing this project (status quo, renovation, upgrade/removal, new construction)
was done. It indicates there is only one option that will meet operational
Base Civil Engineer: Lt
A certificate of exception has been prepared.
requirements.
Co1 Neal McElhannon, (757) 764-2025. Vertical Wing Tank Storage: 1,486 SW = 15,989 SF.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
207
1. COMPONEm
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
LIR FORCE
(computer
2.
DATE
generated)
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, VIRGINIA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
27138
218-712
F-22 VERTICAL WING TANK STORAGE
7. PROJECT WMBER
mmJo43003
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
2,625
'OIRT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location
.re incompatible with use by other components.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
208
1. COMPONERT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
F-22 VERTICAL
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, VIRGINIA
6. CATEGORY
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
27138
218-712
CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
WING TANK STORAGE
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
lmsnJ043003
2,625
1 2 . SUPP-AL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
(c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
l
l
(d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
24-MAY-02
YES
15%
Ol-AUG-02
Ol-SEP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Nost Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Prodpction of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
158
79
(4) Construction
04 JAN
237
211
26
Contract Award
(5) Construction Start
04 FEE
(6) Construction
05 JUL
l
Completion
Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
EQUIPMENT NOMENCLATURE
FUEL TANX STORAGE SYSTEM
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
FISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
3400
2004
Previous editions are obsolete.
COST
($000)
645
Page No.
209
2.
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. COWPORRRT
DATE
(corquter generated)
AIR FORCR
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJRCT
LANGLRYAIR FORCR RAM, VIRGINIA
F-22 CLEAR WATER RINSE PAD
5. PROGRAW
6. CATEGORY
RLRWRRT
CODE 7. PROJRCI:
9.
N[lwBRR
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
Auk
Approp:
HUEaT
116-672
27138
TITLE
COST
ESTIMATES
UNIT
CLEAR WATRR RINSB
Ls
CLRARWATRRRINSE
PAD
SM
RINSE SYSTRW
SUPPORTING
2,431
2,383
COST
1,483
4.100
130
LS
533)
(
(
950)
704
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
LS
(
PAVEMENT
LS
(
DRWOLITION
LS
SOIL RRWRDIATION
Ls
220)
175)
(
(
SUBTOTAL
65)
244)
2,187
CONTINGENCY
i-:-o
109
%)
TOTAL CONTRACI' COST
2,296
SUPERVISION, INSPRCTION ARD OVERBEAD
(
5.7 %)
131
TOTAL REQUEST
2,427
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
2,431
LO. Description of Proposed Construction: Construct an F-22 drive through clear
nater rinse pad adjacent to existing parking apron. Work to include all utilities,
pavements, oil/water separater, and infrastructure as required for a complete and
usable facility.
11. RRQUIRRMRRT:
PROJECT:
4,100S.M
ADEQUATE: 0 SM
Construct F-22 clear water rinse pad.
SUBSTANDARD:
OSM
(New Mission)
RRQUIRRWRWT: An adequately sired and configured drive/taxi - through clear water rinse
New technology and composite materials
pad is required to support the F-22 beddown.
Ear stealth mission capability requires extensive maintenance procedures to preserve
operational capabilities. This facility supports the maintenance of the low observable
(LO) coatings and composites by accomplishing rinsing operations after completing combat
sorties. This project supports aircraft arrival in Nov 04.
CURPRWT SITUATION: The base does not have a drive through clear water rinse pad to
accomplish rinsing operations after combat mission sorties. The F-22 aircraft will be
subjected to the highly corrosive atmosphere associated with coastal environments. In
addition to the corrosive nature of a coastal environment, the abrasive impact
associated with the crystallization of salt on F-22 will cause significant degradation
of the LO coatings.
IWPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Adequate facilities will not be available to perform essential
preventive maintenance on the F-22 aircraft. Without this clear water rinse facility,
the maintainers will be forced to accomplish washing operations within the LO/Composite
Repair facitity eventually creating a maintenance backlog. The corrosive and abrasive
effects due to the coastal environment will accelerate the degradation of the LO
coatings and composite materials, thus impacting operational readiness.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
210
1. coMPoNENT
(computer generated)
4. PROJECT TITLE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
LANGLRY AIR FORCE BASE, VIRGINIA
5. PROGRAW ELEMENT
27138
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
6. CATRGORY COD8
116-672
F-22 CLRAR WATRR RINSE PAD
7. PROJECT NURRRR
MUHJO43006
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
2,431
DDITIONAL:
This project meets the criteria and scope outlined in Air Force Handbook
2-1084, "Facility Requiremeuts".
A preliminary analysis of reasonable options for
ccoaplishing this project (status quo, renovation, upgrade/removal, new construction)
It indicates there is only one option that will meet operational
ras done.
requirements.
A certificate of exception has been prepared.
Baee Civil Engineer: Lt
!ol Neal McRlhannoa, (757)-764-2025. Clear Water Rinse Pad: 4,100 SN I 44,116 SF.
lOINT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location
me incompatible with use by other conponents.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
211
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. coEPoNEWT
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, VIRGINIA
F-22 CLRAR WATER RINSE PAD
5. PROGRAM
6. CATEGORY
ELEWBRT
116-672
27138
1 2 .
CODE 7. PROJECT NUWBER
8. PROJECT
BlIlHJO43006
COST ($000)
2,431
SUPPLRWEBTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Statue:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
* (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
l (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Ccn@ete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
lo-JUN-02
YES
15%
Ol-AUG-02
Ol-SEP-03
NO
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) - (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plane and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
146
(4) Construction
04 JAN
Contract
Award
73
219
195
24
(5) Construction Start
04 FEB
(6) Construction Completion
04 NOV
* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
D FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previoua edition8 are obsolete.
Page No.
212
1. comoRmT
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(computer generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
AIR COMBAT CORMAND, VIRGINIA
PRBDATOR SQUADRON
OPBRATIONS/AMU/IiANGAR
5. PROGRAM BLBMBRT
27245
8. PROJECT COST (SOOO)
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT N[JbIBBR
I
211-111
.9.
ACC043015
I
COST
Auth:
I
I
EST11
UNIT
SQUADRON OPBRATIONS/ABlU/S
SQUADRON
COST
LS
OPERATIONS
AMu/HANGAR
SUPPORTING
i6,25 1
25.73 I
APD~OP:
12,546
SM
1,487
1,971
(
2,931)
SM
4,926
1,952
(
9,616)
FACILITIES
11,100
UTILITIES/PAVEMENTS/SITB IMPR-S
LS
(
2.100)
AIRFIELD PAVRNBRTS/LIGRTING
LS
(
2.700)
INF'RASTRUCTURBUPGRADB
LS
(
6.300)
SUBTOTAL
23,646
CORTING~CY
( 5.0 $1
1,182
I'OTAL CONTRACT COST
24,829
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVBRRRAD
( 5.7 %)
1,415
TOTAL REQUEST
26,244
I'OTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
26,251
LO.
Description of Proposed Construction: Reinforced concrete foundation and floor
Slab, structural steel frame, standing seam metal roof, fire detection/protection,
utilities, site improvements, landscaping, upgrade/expand utility systems,
roads/parking, airfield pavements/lighting/marking. comnunicatioa support, and all
>ther necessarv eumort.
I.
11. RBQUIRBblBNT:
J?ROJK!T:
6,413SM
ADEQUATE: 0 SBl
SUBSTANDARD: 0 SM
Construct Predator Squadron Operations/AMU/Haugar.
(New Miesion)
This project supports the AF objective of a real-time l Hunter/Killerm
IUZQUIRBMBNT:
c:apability by ensuring adequate facilities are available to support unmauned aerial
1rehicle (UAW operations and maintenance activities.
This project supports the stand-up
<,f new combat coded, training and test UAV Predator A (MQ-1) and Predator B @IQ-S)
Y veapon systems.
Permanent facilities are required to support funded aircraft production
The Squadron
()perations/AMU facility is required to eupport mission planaiag, flight operations,
IIrtaintenance functions, mission briefing and debriefing, and administrative functions.
1Phe maintenance dock is required to support direct maintenance of assigned UAV aseete.
fire protection)
1tnfrastructure (water, sewer, electrical, pavfnnents, ccmmunications,
A in F~O3/04 with new airframes arriving in FY05, aud over 1100 personnel.
IInust be provided to the undeveloped beddown site.
(mR= SITUATION:
The beddowu location does not have excess facilities that can br!
reconfigured to support the operations and maintenance requirements of this mission.
Failure to provide facilities to support this new mission
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
beddown will significantly *act UAV operational capabilities. Adequate facilities
will not be available to perform critical flying operations and maintenauce logistics
functions.
This will force inefficient work around8 that will degrade mission
The Air Forces capability to train personnel for this critical mission
accomplishment.
DD FORM 1391, DBC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
213
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(computer
generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND, VIRGINIA
PREDATOR SQUADRON
OPERATIONS/AMU/HANGAR
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
27245
211-111
I. PROJECT NUMBER
ACC043015
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
26,251
:ould be severely inhibited.
This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Handbook 32A preliminary analysis of reasonable options for
accomplishing this project was done.
It indicates there is only one option that will
Beet operational requirements, therefore, a full economic analysis was not performed. A
:ertificate of exception has been prepared.
(Squadron Operations: 1,487 SM = 16,000 SF;
MCI/Hangar: 4,926 SM = 5 3 , 0 0 4 S F )
DDITIONAL:
.084,
"Facility Requirements."
POINT USE CERTIFICATION: Mission requirements, operational considerations, and location
ire incompatible with use by other components.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
214
1 .
CONPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
(computer
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
AIR COMBAT COMMAND, VIRGINIA
PREDATOR SQUADRON
OPERATIONS/AMU/HANGAR
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE I. PROJECT NUMBER
27245
211-111
2. DATE
generated)
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
ACC043015
26,251
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Coet Estimates used to develop COet8
* (c) Percent Complete ae of 01 JAW 2003
* (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
24-JUL-02
YES
15%
Ol-SEP-02
15-SEP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Wae Most Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Coats
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
1,575
700
2,363
1,969
394
(4) Construction Contract Award
04 JAN
(5) Construction Start
04 FEB
(6) Construction Completion
05 SEP
l
Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which ie comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with thie project provided from other appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391, DEC 7b
Page No.
1. coIdPoNmm
2. MTE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTIOt+ PROJECT DATA
(caoputer generated)
4IRFoRcE
j. INSTALLATION AND LOCATIOly
4. PROJECT TITLE
~QUS&l',DISTRICTO~COLDHEIA
cxAssIFIED MILCoBl PRoJEep
5.PROGRAMW
6.CATEGORYCODR
27248
999-999
9.
7.PRoJEcTMlMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($000,
PAY2040004
COST
3,250
ESTIWhTES
UNIT
Ia
!Lrm81FIRD MILCOBl PRosmcT
UPPORTIW FACILITIES
mmhL
COST
3,250
0
3,250
'OTAL COWPRhCT COST
3,250
WrhL REQWST
3,250
'OThL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
3,250
0.
Description of Prapoeed Construction:
l.REQLulRRMmTrL8
ROdBCT:
Em
ADEQuhm: Ls
SUBSThNMRD: LS
hs raqu~red.
: Special access required.
DD FORM 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
216
OUTSIDE THE
UNITED STATES
COMPONENT
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
12. DATE
AIR FORCE
4. COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COST INDEX
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
4JES FIELD, AZORES
ORTUGAL
1.3
Personnel
trength
S OF 30 SEP 02
ND FY 2007
PERMANENT
OFF ENL
CIV
96
853
692
96
854
963
STUDENTS
OFF ENL CIV
20
69
6
20
69
6
INVENTORY DATA ($000)
944
Total Acreage:
Inventory Total as of: (30 Sep 02)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
Planned in Next Four Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
SUPPORTED
OFF
ENL
4
6
4
6
a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
None
TOTAL
1,79’ I
2,06: 3
732,16( I
(I
4,0825
(I
57,90( I
15,20( I
809,34t 5
(FY 2005)
PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ATEGORY
ODE
PROJECT TITLE
42-674
Add To And Alter Fitness Center
CIV
45
45
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS,
SCOPE
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
1,735 SM
4,086 Feb-02
Sep-0: 3
4,086
Total
(FY2005)
b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
11-111
Repair Aircraft Maint Hangar
8,818 SM
14,800
14-425
Transportation Complex
3,818 SM
9,300
21-315
Transient Quarters Phl
4,900 SM
12,200
21-315
Transient Quarters Ph2
5,880 SM
14,600
2,821 SM
7,000
30-I 42
Fire/Crash Rescue Station
13
c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation:
0. Mission or Major Functions: The host air base wing has no permanently assigned force structure but
rovides en route support to transiting aircraft and hosts Headquarters US Forces Azores. Lajes Field
erves as a logistical bridge to Europe, Africa, and Southwest Asia by providing a ground refueling and stopver capability, functioning as a tanker staging location for in-flight refueling and serving as a primary divert
ase for deploying aircraft.
1. Outstanding Pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
0
a. Air pollution
b. Water Pollution
0
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
0
D Form 1390,9 JulO2
217
1. COWPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LAJES FIELD, PORTUGAL
ADD TO AND ALTER FITNESS CENTER
5. PROGRAM ELEWRNT
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMSER
27596
WQNAO53002
742-614
9.
COST
4,086
ESTIWATES
UNIT
COST
LS
ADD/ALTER FITNESS CENTER
3,494
HAWC ADDITION
SM
425
2,850
(
1,211
RENOVATION
SM
1,549
1,470
(
2,277
ANTITERRORISW FORCE PROTECTION
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
I
(6
144
I
PAVRWENTS
LS
SITE IWPROVKMEWTS
LS
(
101
(
SUBTOTAL
44
3,638
2ONTINGENCY
( 5.0 %)
182
M)TAL CONTRACT CQST
3,020
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AWD OVERHEAD
( 6.5 %)
240
l'OTAL REQUEST
4,069
POTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
4,086
EQUIPMENT FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS (NON-ADD)
( 18.0 1
to. Description of Proposed Construction: Construct a 425 SM addition for the health
md wellnees center (HAWC!). Renovate existing HAWC to eupport storage and
administration.
Renovate main lobby. Install new floors in gymnasium and aerobic8
room. Refinish racquetball courts. Complete HVAC syetem. Force protection will
:omply with minimum DOD etandards.
Lir Conditioning:
Ll. RBQuIRKbfEWT:
'ROJECT:
15oRW.
5,556SW
ADEQUATE: 2,707 SM
SUBSTANDARD: 174SM
Add to and alter fitness center. (Current Mission)
LEQUIREWEWT:
Amodern, adequate sized and properly configured fitness center to conduct
mmpreheneive and balanced programs for physical fitness programs required for Lajee AFR
,ereonnel and their dependents which ie a major quality of life and retention
Pereonnel require eafe fitneee program8 including aerobics, health,
:equirement.
lental, and nutritional training, indoor recreational athletic activities, and a health
tnd wellneee center at thie overseas base.
WRRENT SITUATION: Lajes Field ie classified as a medium baee per the USAF Fitness
Facilities Design Guide. Thie is the only existing fitness center on Lajee Field for US
The HAWC is co-located within this facility. Generally, the facility is in
)ersonnel.
iair condition but is inadequately sized. Limited facilities for HAWC and existing
:equirements are 20% deficient per USAF Fitness Facilities Design Guide standard.
:MPACT IF NOT PROVIDRD:
Physical conditioning and recreational programs will remain
imited due to space restrictiona. This condition, coupled with deficiencies in all
:ore areas, will continue to adversely affect the physical conditioning, morale, well
,eing, and retention rate of assigned military personnel thus impacting Lajes'
:apability to accomplieh its mieeion. Additionally, testing, training, and
:eam/individual eporte will continue to be hindered due to inadequate playing surfaces.
FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
218
1. COBIPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT
LLJES FIELD, PORTUGAL
ADDTOANDALTERPITNESS~R
5. PROGRAW ELEMENT
27596
6. CATEGORY CODE
742-674
7.
PROJECT
TITLE
MJF5ER
’ MQNAOSSOOZ
8.
PROJECT
COST ($000)
4,086
DDITIONAL: ~hie project meets the criteria/scope specified in AFB 32-1084, "Facility
A preliminary analyeie of reasonable options for accomgliehing thie
!equirementen.
zoject (statue quo, renovation, new construction) was done. It indicate8 there ie only
me option that will meet requirementa. Because of this, a full economic analyeie wae
rot performed. A certificate of exception hae been prepared. Base Civil Engineer: Lt
!ol Terry Watkins, 011-351-295-576113. HAWC Addition: 425 SM - 4,573 SF; Renovation:
.,549 SM - 16,667 SF.
lOIWT USE CERTIFICATION: Wiieeion requirementa, operational coneideratione, and location
me incompatible with uBe by other components.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
219
. coNPoNENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
(computer generated)
IR FORCE
. INSTALLATION AND LQCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
AJES FIELD, PORTUGAL
ADD TO AND ALTER FITNESS CENTER
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUMBER
. PROGRAMRLBMBNT
742-674
27596
2. SUPPLEMENTAL
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
MQNAO53002
4,086
DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Statue:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Coat Estimatea used to develop costs
* (c) Percent Complete ae of 01 JAN 2003
* (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Rnergy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
Ol-FRR-02
YES
15%
Ol-AUG-02
Ol-SEP-03
YES
(2) Bade:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Design Was Moat Recently Ueed -
NO
(3) Total Coat (c) I (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Pro%ction of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costa
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
245
123
368
327
41
(4) Conetruction Contract Award
04 JAN
(5) Conetruction Start
04 FEB
(6) Conetruction Completion
05 PEB
l
Indicates cqletion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided fram other appropriations:
EQUIPMRNT NOMKNCLATDRR
COBR4UNICATION
FORM 1391, DEC 76
EQUIP/WIRING
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
FISCAL YgAR
APPROPRIATED
OR RBQDESTRD
3400
2004
Previous edition@ are obsolete.
COST
($000)
18
Page No.
220
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. COMMAND:
?AMSTElN AIR BASE,
UNITED STATES AIR
SERMANY
FORCE, EUROPE
5. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
strength
OFF
ENL
CIV
OFF ENL CIV
4s OF 30 SEP 02
1247
6655 2366
120 1199
124
END FY 2009
1256
6669 2343
120 1199
124
‘. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
3. Total Acreage:
3,102
I. Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
:. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
1. Authorization Requested in this Program:
?. Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
‘. Planned in Next Four Years Program:
1. Remaining Deficiency:
1. Grand Total:
3. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ZATEGORY
=ODE
PROJECT TITLE
131-454
1st Combat Communication SQ, PH. II
742-674
Fitness Center Annex
la. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
122-264
Small Diameter Bomb
)b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
113-321
Ramp 1, PH. II
113-321
Ramp 1, PH. III
Theather Aerospace Op Spt Center
I40-000
141-000
Contingency Response Group, PH. II
141-000
86 AES Facility
141-000
Squad OPSIAMU 37AS
141-786
Air Expeditionary Force Processing Center
!1 l-l 11
C-l 3OJ-30 Aircraft Hangar
!ll-111
C-l 30 Fuel Cell Hangar
Zl4-425
CTS Vehicle Maintenance
Z14-425
Vehicle Maintenance Facility
!18-712
AGE Maintenance
Civil Engineer Sqd Midfield Complex
!I9443
510-261
Warrior Preparation Center
5. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
1.22
SUPPORTED
OFF
CIV
ENL
302
586
49
302
586
49
TOTAL
1264 I8
12.64 .8
2,801,70 IO
154.30 16
35,61 6
2.06 86
216,95 ‘0
185,25 0
3,395,88 8
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
7,100 SM
5,356 SM
Total
(FY2005)
1.190 SM
Total
77,000
61,000
4,366
7,700
2,020
3,713
7,559
3,500
3,600
1,314
2,450
2,402
2,570
10,591
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
COST DESIGN STATUS
SO00 S T A R T C M P L
19,713 Apr-02
Sep-03
15,903 Mar-02
Aug-03
35,616
2,066
2,066
23,600
14,100
25,700
19,100
9,050
12,500
28,420
8,660
9,400
4,350
8,100
6,950
6,347
40,673
87
)c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
IO. Mission or Major Functions: A host airlift wing supporting a C-130E squadron, a C-9A squadron and a squadron
momposed of C-26A, and C-21A aircraft; Headquarters, United States Air Forces in Europe and Headquarters, Allied Air
-orces Central Europe.
Il. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
0
a. Air pollution:
b. Water Pollution:
0
c. Occupational Safety and Health:
0
d. Other Environmental:
14,700
221
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
PY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(ccmputer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAw3TlnNAIRBAw, GBRNANY
CONSOLIMTED 1ST COMBAT COMMUNICATION
SQUADRON, PH 2
5. PROGRAM m
6. CATRgORY CODR 7. PROJECT ND'MRER
27596
131-111
TwRO230462
8. PROJECT COST ($000,
19,713
COST ESTIMATES
9.
CONSOLIDATED 1ST CoI(BAT COISSJNICATION
COMEIAT CONNUNI CATIONS
(
12,908)
ANTITERRORISM PORCR PROTECTION
SUPPORTS FACILITIES
UTILITIES
-CATION SUPPORT
PAWS
PASSIVE FORCE PROTECTION -8
SITS =R-S
8uBToTAL
COWF-
‘I’OTAL COWI’RACT
(
1,349)
(
1.124)
l ( 5.0
COST
%)
SUPRRVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERMUD
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUSST (ROUNDED)
19,688
SQUIPMRWI PROBl OTHER APPROPRIATIONS
19,713
( 400.0)
(NON-ADD)
LO.
Description of Proposed Construction: All civil, structural, mechanical,
alectrical, fire prevention/alarm and oomwnication supporting work necessary for the
:onstruction of a ccmbat camamications compound. Consists of mawnry or nmdular
:onstructed facilities with eloped roofing systa. Provides space for maintenance and
vehicle parking, utilities, and all other support. Includes minimum DOD interim force
protection standards.
11. RRQUIRXWEUT:
8,686SM
ADEQUATE:
1,586
SM
SUBSTANMRD: 7,060BM
Consolidate combat camun ications squadron. (current Mission).
3BQUIREMwIT: Adequately sized and configured facilities to provide optimum support for
the canhat ccamaunications squadron. Adequate facilities are required to efficiently and
affectively house all functions of the the combat cwmnm ications squadron inluding rapid
seployable camaun ications and air traffic control services throughout Europe, Africa.
aud the Middle East. The unit also supports the United Nations, Joint Chiefs of Staff,
Sorth Atlantic Treaty Organization, United States European Coamand, Department of State,
and US/coalition task forces during wartime, exercises, and military operations other
:han war as directed by United States Air Forces in Europe.
PROJECT:
VRRRNT SITUATION: Current facilities, which consist of an old flight operations
wilding and a series of hardened aircraft shelters, are not adequate to meet mission
Leeds. These facilities were meant to be used on a temporary basis. The geographic
leparation of unit functions makes operations, CampllLapd, and control inefficient and
Personnel are working in undersized offices/areas and facilities not
liffioult.
lesigned for their mission. These conditions reduce productivity and morale. Parking
DD FORM 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
222
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. CoBPomzm
(caaputer
kIRFORCE
2 .
MTE
generated)
3. INSTALLRTION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
IzAMsmINAIRAIR, Gmx?LNY
CONSOLIMTRD 1ST COMBAT COWWNICATION
SQUADRON, PH 2
5.
6 .
PROgRAR m
CATSGORY
CODE 7 .
131-111
27596
PROJECT TyFRO230462
8.
PROJRCT COST ($000)
19,713
pace for the unit's mobility vehicles is extrmly limited. The current location
estricts the ability to rapidly assemble and transfer the assets to assigned staging
ocationa due to conetricted traffic patterna and roads.
BIPACTIFNOTPROVIDRD:
Ccebatc~cations sguadronwillcontinuetobe hindereddue
o inefficient, undersized, and less than optimum operating conditions and location.
he unit will not be able to perform and provide fisrt-rate ccsmaan d and control
~ommmications for forces within their mandatory response time. Functions will continue
.t decreased productivity for customers and negatively irspact their mission.
DDITIONAL: This project is not currently eligible for NATO funding. A precautionary
me-finance statement will be filed in the event eligibility is established. This
moject meets the criteria/ecope specified in Air Force Handhook 32-1084, Vacility
mquireanentsw . A preliminary analysis of reasonable optione was done and indicates that
knly one option meets operational requirements. A certificate of exception has been
This is the second phase of a two-phase project. Base Civil Rngineer: Co1
prepared.
reffrey L Leptrone, 011-49-6371-6228. combat camnun ications: 7,100 wd = 76,424 SF.
yIREI~cuRmQxYx
FCF Budget Rate used:
EURO-DOLLAR
1.1386
K)INT USR CRRTIFIC!ATIONr This facility can be used by other cceumnents on an "as
Lvailablew basis, however, the scope of the project is based on Air Force requirements.
FORN 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
223
1. COHPONRNT
TY 2004 NILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(cawuter generated)
AIR roRQ
3.
4.
INSTALLATION MID IBCATIOU
PROJECT TITLE
CONSOLIMTKD 1ST COMBAT COlQSRRC&TION
RAMsTnu~BAsE, -
SQUAUROU,
5. PROGRAM
6 .
-
CATEGORYCOM
7 .
PH 2
P R O J E C T -
8.
PROJECT COST ($000,
TYFRO230462
131-111
27596
1 2 .
2. DATE
19.713
SUPP-AL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Rstimatea used to develop costs
* (cl Percent Ccamlete as of 01 irAR 2 0 0 3
l (d) Date 35% Dosigned
(e) Date Design Complete
(f) Qlergy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
02-APR-02
YES
15%
Ol-xX3-02
Ol-SRP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
( a ) S t a n d a r d o r Definitive D e s i g n -
uo
(b) Where Design Was Ncmt Recently Used (3)
Total
Cost
(c) - (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
( a ) Produktion
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
of
($000)
1,183
591
1,774
1,478
296
Plans and Specifications
All Other Design costs
Total
Contract
In-house
(4) Construction Contract Award
0 4
(5) construction start
04 FEB
(6)
0 6
l
Construction CaaDletioa
m
NAR
Indkates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is c-arable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Rquimt associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
EQuIplaesT-m
-CATION RQUIPHQTT
DD
FORM 1391, DRC 76
AFPROPRIATIOU
FISCAL Y-mm
APPROPRIATRD
OR RRQURSTRD
3000
2004
Previous editions are 0Dsolete.
COST
($000)
400
Page No.
224
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. COMPONENT
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAWSTEIN AIR BASE, GERWANY
FITNESS CRWTER ANNRX
5 . PROGRAW
ELRWENT
6. CATEGORY
CODE 7.
PROJECT
742-674
27596
9.
NLR+BRR
8. PROJECT
TYFR023043
COST
COST ($000)
15,903
ESTIMATES
COST
UNIT
II/=I ~ITNRSS CRNTRR
FITNESS CENTER ANNRX
ANTITERRORISM FORCE PROTECTION
SM
5,356
0
=y I
5,356
2,432
13,096
( 1 3 , 0 2 6 )
(
I LS I
L XIPPORTING FACILITIES
70)
1,186
UTILITIES
LS
(
PAVEMENTS
LS
( 3 3 5 )
LS
(
SITE IMPROVRMRNTS
PASSIVE FORCE
PROTECTION
LS
MEASURES
LS
COWWDNICATION SUPPORT
E XTBTOTAL
318)
(
42)
(
70)
14,282
C !GNTINGENCY
'1 DTAL
421)
714
&.o %)
CONTRACT COST
E KTPERVISION,
14,996
INSPECTION AND OVRRRRAD
(
6.5
%)
975
'J XlTAL REQUEST
15,971
'1 :OTAL 'REQUEST (ROUNDRD)
15,903
E~QUIPWRRT
FROM
OTHER
APPROPRIATIONS
(
(NON-ADD)
2.0
1
Description of Proposed Construction: A two-story structure with reinforced
1.o.
C 'oncrete foundation and floor slabs, masonry walls, roof system, fire protection.
I ncludes space for weight lifting, group and individual exercise areas, men's and
women's locker rooms / showers / latrines, indoor running track, and all necessary
u.tilities and support. Includes minimum DOD interim force protection standards.
1 l. RRQUIRRWRWT:
17,898 SM
ADEQUATE: 12,542 SM
SUBSTANDARD: 0 SM
(Current Mission)
Construct a fitness center Annex.
E~ROJRCT:
A
modern,
adequate
sized
and
properly
configured fitness center to conduct
EQUIRRWRWT:
s
C cnuprehensive and balanced programs for physical fitness programs required for Ramstein
AFR personnel and their dependents which is a major quality of life and retention
Personnel require safe fitness programs including aerobics, health,
rrequirement.
mlantal, and nutritional training, indoor recreational athletic activities, and a health
and wellnese center at this overseas base.
They
!GURRRNT SITUATION: The existing Air Force fitness centers are over 45 years old.
The combined
r,equire constant repair and maintenance to remain operational condition.
8 quare meters of the four existing fitness centers do not equal the authorized square
mieters outlined in AFH 32-1084 and in the new AF Fitness Center Design Guide for the
n umber of personnel working and living in the area. The lack of adequate space leads to
0 vercrowded, unavailable facilities for much of the base population. Daily use of the
R amstein fitness centers increased from 800 to 1200 people daily in the last 4 years.
F acilities cannot accomodate the electrical requirements of state-of-the-art fitness
e quipment and the ventilation system is inadequate. Space shortages exist throughout
Weather
t he facilities, in the locker rooms, weight rooms, and aerobic rooms.
FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
225
PY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAMSTEIN AIR BASE, GERMANY
FITNESS CRNTER ANNRX
5. PROGRAM ELEMRNT
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NxDmRR
742-674
21596
TYFR023043
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
15,903
zonditions in Ge rmany validate the need for an indoor running track. Long hours of
larkneas, rain and icy condition6 prohibit personnel from running outside year-round.
:o maintain adequate fitness levels a year-round use facility is needed.
MPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Physical condition will continue to be limited due to
inadequate space requirements. Thie will negatively affect the morale, quality of life,
xoductivity, and impacta retention and combat readineee.
Inadeguate ventilation will
:ontinue to make it uncomfortable and unhealthy to exerciee; furthermore, electrical
shortfalls will not support additional equipment.
Thie project ie not eligible for NATO funding. Thie project meets the
K)DITIONAL:
:riteria/scope epecified in AP Handbook 32-1084, "Facility Requirementan and the Air
?orce Fitness Center Maeter Plan criteria. This ie a corporate Air Force directed
project eesential for personnel quality of life, and retention of highly skilled
Only one option meets the miesion requirement. Therefore, a full economic
?arsonnel.
malysis was not,completed. A certificate of exception has been prepared.
Base Civil
Co1 Jeffrey L. Leptrone, 011-49-6371-47-6228. Fitnese Center Annex:
3ngineer:
5,356
Dl I 57,652 SF.
ZORBIGN CURRRNCY:
FCF Budget Rate Deed: RURO-DOLLAR 1.1386
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: This facility ie progransned for joint use with all other
nilitary components; however, it ie fully funded by the Air Force.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
226
1. COWPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
RAWSTEIN AIR BASE, GERWANY
FITNESS CENTER ANNEX
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
2. DATE
(computer generated)
6. CATEGORY CODE 7. PROJECT NUWRER
27596
742-674
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
TYFRO23043
15,903
12. SUPP LEblENTAL DATA:
a. Eetimated DeBign Data:
(1) s t a t u e :
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Coat Eetimates used to develop costs
* (c) Percent Complete ae of 01 JAN 2003
l
(d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date DeBig3I Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis wae/will be performed
15-H&R-02
YES
15%
Ol-AUG-02
Ol-AUG-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Whey- Design Wae Moat Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other DeBigI3 Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-houee
($000)
954
477
1,431
1,272
159
(4) Conetruction Contract Award
04 FEB
(5) Construction Start
04 FEB
(6) Construction Completion
05 DEC
* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Coat Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment aseociated with thie project provided from other appropriatione:
EQUIPWRNT NOMENCLATURE
EXERCISE EQUIPWENT
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
FISCAL YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
3080
2004
editions
are obsolete.
COST
($000)
2
Page No.
227
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
12. DATE
I
AIR FORCE
:I. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. COMMAND:
5. AREA CONSJ
ESPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE,
UNITED STATES AIR
COST INDEX
;;ERMANY
FORCE, EUROPE
1.23
Ei. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
5strength
CIV
OFF EN1 CIV
OFF
EN1
OFF
EN1
CIV
TOTAL
F4s OF 30 SEP 02
324
3806
644
1
168
4,94
EIND FY 2009
320
3822
642
1
168
4,95
7‘. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
iI. Total Acreage:
1,374
t). Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,472,90;
C :. Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
33,21;
C I. Authorization Requested in this Program:
25,33’
E:. Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
f Planned in Next Four Years Program:
70,642
33,081
c 1. Remaining Deficiency:
tI. Grand Total:
1,635,17E
EI. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
C:ATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
d :ODE
1‘41-786
Passenger Terminal
7‘31-142
Fire Station Annex and Traning Facility
7‘42-674
Fitness Center
E151-147
South Gate
E)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
None
slb. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Four Years:
1121-111
POL Admin Ops Facility
1141-786
Mobility Processing Center
1141-962
Control Tower
;F14-426
ADAL Vehicle OPS Complex
2!18-712
AGE Facility
4142-758
MRSP/Supply Warehouse
MUNS Maint Admin Maint Facility
cj10-129
i‘21-312
Dormitory (96 PN)
i‘21-312
Dormitory (96 PN)
i722-351
Dining Facility
i‘24-417
Visitors Quarters
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS
SCOPE
650 SM
1,150 SM
6,950 SM
16,960 LS
Total
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
1,546 Apr-02
Sep-03
3,865 Apr-02
Sep-03
17,117 Mar-02
Sea-03
2,800 Mar-03
Se;03
25,328
(FY 2005)
662 SM
2,220 SM
724 SM
4,330 SM
2,560 SM
4,554 SM
560 SM
3,674 SM
9,600 SM
1,712 SM
4,273 SM
1,592
6,150
4,200
2,500
5,000
14,400
1,550
9,700
10,000
6,150
9,400
27
E rc. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
1,O. Mission or Major Functions: A USAFE installation that is home to the largest fighter operation in Germany. A host
F:ighter Wing commands three fighter squadrons and an air control squadron flying F-l 6 C&Ds and OA/A-1 OS.
1 1. Outstanding pollution and Safety (OSHA) Deficiencies:
a. Air pollution
0
b. Water Pollution
0
c. Occupational Safety and Health
0
d. Other Environmental
0
C
228
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. COMPONENT
(computer
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PRoJgCT TITLE
SPANGDARLRMAIR
FIRR STATION ANNEX AND TRAINING
FACILITY
BASE, GRRMANY
5. PROGRAM ELXHXNT
6. CATRGORY CODR 7.
27596
VYRXO13203
731-142
9.
PROJECT NUMRRR
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
3,865
COST ESTIMATES
PIRR STATION ANNEX/TRAINING FACILITY
FIRE STATION ANNRX FACILTY
FIRE
TRAININGARRA
ANTITERRORISM FORCE PROTECTION
SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
COMMIJNICATIONS
SUPPORT
SITE IMPROVRMSNTS
UTILITIES
PAVRbIRNTS
PASSIVE FORCE Pi%TK!TIONMRASURRS
SUBTOTAL
( 5.0 %)
POTAL CONTRACT COST
ZONTINGRNCY
WPRRVISION, INSPECTION AND OVRRRRAD
POTAL REQUEST
POTAL REQUEST (RODNDRD)
-0. Description of Proposed Construction: Reinforced concrete foundation/floor slabs
md masonry walls. Construction to include roll-up doors, fire protection eyatem.
.iving quarters. pitched roof, utilities, site improvements, vehicle parking, and a
:oncrete fire training area with 2Ocm (6") thick concrete pavement and installation of
L fire training structure. Includes minimum DOD interim force protection standards.
Il. RRQUIRRMXNT:
'ROJRCT:
3,563SY
ADEQUATE:
605 SM
SUBSTANDARD: 1,267SY
Construct a Fire Station Annex and Training Area (Current Mission).
LEQUI- :
A properly sized and functionally adeguate fire station annex is required
:o aupport fire fighting responses on Spangdahlem AR. Annex muet be manned 24
lours/day, 7 days/week, with overnight acconmrodationa.
Project provides a fire station
~nneac strategically located to enable fire fighting personnel to meet 3-minute response
:imes to the furthest end of the runway and to structures within a two-mile radius per
IoD Instruction 6055.6. Additionally, an adequate fire training area is required to
maintain fire fighter proficiency.
'URRRRT SITUATION: Spangdahlem AS currently has only one SO-year old fire atation to
upport all airfield, base structure, and houeing responses. Fire trucks cannot meet
.equired response times to all areas of the base, and vehicles must cross active
axiwaye to reach most of the base facilities. The current station is undersized for
:he number of trucks and personnel for today's mission.
Furthermore, due to the Rhein
rain transition/expansion activities, the current fire training area will be demolished
.o make way for the new aircraft parking ramp. AT/FP costs for this project are higher
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
229
r.
1. COMPONENT
PY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR PORCR
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
SPANGDAHLEN AIR RARE, GERMANY
FIRE STATION ANNRX AND TRAINING
FACILITY
5. PROGRAMRLRMRRT
6. CATRGORY CODE
27596
731-142
7. PROJECT NDMRRR
VYSlCO13203
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
3,865
ban standard DOD guidance due to stricter USCINCRDR AT/FP OPORD 01-01 force protection
tandards requiring higher-level structural hardening, splinter protection, and stronger
,indow treatments.
Fire fighter reaponse on Spangdahlem AB will continue to be
MPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Lelayed due to the need to cross active taxiways to respond to daily calls for support.
lelays in response increase the possibility of loss of life, aircraft and other
'eeourcee critical to the mission. In addition, fire fighters will continue to work in
.nferior, inefficient facilities which adversely impact their ability to provide
,deguate fire protection for the entire base populace and will lack a training area to
maintain their fire fighting and crash rescue proficiency.
SDITIONAL: This project is not eligible for NATO funding, however, a precautionary
Ire-finance statement will be filed in the event eligibility is established. This
broject meets the criteria/scope specified in Air Force Handbook 32-1094, *Facility
!equirements" . i‘preliminary analysis of reasonable options was done and indicated that
nly one option meets operational requirements. A certificate of exception has been
Irepared. Ease Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Kurt J. Kaieler, 011-49-6565-6302. Fire Station
1,150 SM - 12,374 SF; Training Area: 2,500 SM - 26,910 SF.
UlXleX:
PORRIGN CURRENCY:
FCF Budget Rate Used: RDRO-DOLLAR 1.1386
lOINI USE CERTIFICATION: Miaaion requirements, operational considerations, and location
Lre incompatible with use by other components.
DD FORM 1391, DRC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
230
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. coHPoNmT
3. INSTALLATION AND LGCATION
SPANGDARLEM
AIR EASE,
4. PROJECT TITLE
GERMANY
5 . PROGRAM ELEMENT
FIRE STATION ANNEX AND TRAINING
FACILITY
6. CATEGORY CODE
7. PROJECT NUMEER
731-142
VYHKO13203
27596
1 2 .
2. DATE
(computer generated)
AIR FORCE
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
3,865
SUPPLEWENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Complete as of 01 JAN 2003
l (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Deaign Complete
(f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
20-APR-02
YES
35%
30-AUG-02
Ol-SEP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where Deeign Was Btost Recently Used -
NO
(3) Total C&t (c) I (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications
(b) All Other Design Costs
(c) Total
(d) Contract
(e) In-house
($000)
(4) Construction Contract Award
04 FEB
(5) Construction Start
04 MAR
(6)
05 FRB
Construction
232
116
348
309
39
Completion
* Indicates completion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is comparable to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided from other appropriations:
F I S C A L YRAR
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
FURNITURE
3400
2005
75
COWKUNICATION EQUIPWENI
3400
2005
75
EQUIPMENT NOWENCLATURE
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
COST
($000)
Page No.
231
l.CCRPONRNT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJRCT DATA
AIR FORCR
(cauputer generated)
3. INSTALLATION AND LCCATION
4. PROJRCT TITLE
SP-AIRBASE,
PASSRImRRTRRMmAL
GERxaNY
S.PRCGRAMELmmNT
6. CATRGORY CODE 7.
27596
141-786
9.
IONSTRUCT
2. DATE
PROJECT
RUMSRR
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
VYRRO23001
1,546
COST ESTINATES
PAS- TRRMIW&
PASSENOKR
TmMINAL
( 1,082 1
ANTITRRRORISMFORCR PROTECTION
3DPPORTIIW FACILITIES
PAWS
UTILITIES
SIW6 IRPRWRt4RRTS
COMMUNICATION SUPPORT
3uBToTAL
ZoNTnmENcY
( 5.0 %)
roTALcoBrrRAcT co&
3UPRRVISION, INSPRCTION AND WRRRRAD
roTAL REQUEST
L'OTAL REQUEST (ROUNDRD)
1,546
.O. Description of Proposed Constructioll:
Construction includes concrete foundations
md floor slab, masonry walls, structural steel frame, pitched roof, fire protection
lysttrm, all utilities, incorporate force protection measures, pavememts, RVAC, site
mprwements, and any additional work associated with this project.
.l. RRQUIRIDISWT:
65OSM
ADEQUATE: 0 SM
SUBSTANMRD: OSM
Construct a Passenger Terminal. (New Mission)
LEQUIRENENT:
Construct a facility to support in-transit passengers while aircraft
lerpicing or repairs are made. Facility will also be used for processing originating
lasseugers onto aircraft in support of worldwide contingency operations. Providean
mclosed secure, cwered area for up to 150 passengers to off-load and wait for required
aircraft mainteuance to be performed prior to re-boarding and proceeding to the final
Location needs to be separated frcm other base activities since passengers
lestiuation.
till have processed through security at their originating location. Include capability
.o process passengers on au emergency basis to other aircraft due to mechanical delays
m- unforeseen requirements.
Ccumunications requiremeuts include LAN connectivity,
:lobal Air Terminal Execution System, and a public address system.
'RCnJECT:
VRRRUI SITUATION: Due to Rheiu-Main Air Base closing by Dee 2005, the airlift mission
.s being relocated between Ramsteiu aud Spaugdahlem. Siuce this base will be a key
kropeau location for in-transit aircraft supportiug contingency and peacetime
perations, it will be used for re-fueling, performing minor maintenance, and changing
kcrews, before continuing ou to the final destination. In-transit passengers will be
.eguired to wait up to three hours outside the aircraft in the harsh weather conditions,
br in vehicles until aircraft servicing is completed.
MPACT IF NOT PROVIDRD: In-transit troops and passengers will have to wait in
tnsecured/non-sterile locations, in harsh weather conditions prior to re-boarding
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
232
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1. coMPoruWr
2. DATE
(cmputer generated)
AIRFORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
sP-AIRBAw,-
PASSRNGRRTERMIWG
6. C!AmRY CODE 7. PROJECT -
5.PRoGRAMELRHEuT
141-786
27596
vniuO23001
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
1,546
drcraft to destination.
The ramp and hsngars will continue to be used for troops ad
passengers waiting to re-board aircraft.
~his project is not eligible for HATO funding. This project meets the
:riteria/sxope specified in Air Force Handbook 32-1084, nFacility requirementen. A
preliminary analysis of reasonable options was done and indicates that anly one optics
mete operational requirements. A certificate of exception ha8 been prepared. Base
:ivil mgineeer: Lt co1 lcurt Kaisler, 011-49-6565-61-6302. Passenger Terminal: 650 SN
iDDITION?aL:
: 6,994 SF.
?oRR1GNCURRmxY:
FCF Budget Rate Used: EURO-DOW 1.1386
TOINT USE CRRTIFICATION: This facility is prOgraIIEWd for joint use with all Other
ailitary cmponentsl however. it is fully funded by the Air Force.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
Previous editions are obsolete.
Page No.
233
l.CcR#PoNENT
FY
2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(cwter generated)
AIR FORCR
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
sPNa3MmEHAIRBASE‘GEmlAm
PAS- TlmKnmL
s.PRoGRAMm
2. DATE
6. CATRGORY CODR 7. PROJECT NOHBER
27596
141-786
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
VYEUO23001
1,546
12. SUPP-AL DATA:
a. lhthated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Date Design Started
(b) Parametric Cost Estimates used to develop costs
l (c) Percent Canplete as of 01 m 2003
l (d) Date 35% Designed
(e) Date Design Ca@ete
(f) Qlergy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was/will be performed
04-APR-02
YES
15%'
Ol-mm-02
Ol-SEP-03
YES
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) ~bere Design Was Most Recatly Used -
No
(3) Total Coat (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a) Production of Plans aad specificatioau
(b) All &r De~sign costs
(c) Total
(d) Ccmtract
(e) In-house
($000)
93
46
139
124
15
(4) Construction Contract Award
04 JAN
(5) Construction Start
04 FEE
(6) Construction Cmletion
05 WAR
l
Indicates canpletion of Project Definition with Parametric Cost Estimate
which is c-able to traditional 35% design to ensure valid scope,
cost and executability.
b. Equipment associated with this project provided fran other appropriationsi
N/A
yrevxoua eaxxone are ormosece.
Page No.
234