Department of the Air Force
Military Construction and Family
Housing Program
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2000
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
President’s Budget
Page Number
General
Table of Contents ................................................................
1
Program Summary ..............................................................
3
Militarv Construction
State Summary (List of Projects) .......................................
5
New Mission/Current Mission Exhibit ..............................
13
Installation Index ................................................................
21
Special Program Considerations:
Statements .........................................................................
23
Congressional Reporting Requirements ........................
24
Research and Development .............................................
26
Third Party Financing .....................................................
27
Appropriation Language ....................................................
29
Inside the United States Construction Projects.. ..............
31
Outside the United States Construction Projects.. ...........
231
Unspecified Minor Construction .......................................
259
Planning and Design ...........................................................
261
Working Capital Funds Construction Projects.. ..............
263
1
Inside the United States Construction Projects
Il. COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
IBOLLING
AIR FORCE BASE WASHINGTON,
14. PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT
DC
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
1
I
I
BXUR980010
ICHILD
DEVELOPMENT CENTER
I
(12.
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(1)
12. DATE
I
DATA
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
Date Design
Started
(a)
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
Percent
Complete
as
of
Jan
2000
* (c)
*(d)
Date 35% Designed.
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
99 JAN 22
costs
y
15%
99 DEC 30
00 SEP 15
be performed
Y
I
/
i
1
1
1
I
I
(2)
(3)
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
Where Design
lb)
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
-
NO
Used
-
N/A
($000)
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(a)
I
(3a)
(4)
(5)
Construction
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
01 NL
01 AUG
03 FEB
Completion
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
b.
Equipment
associated
other
appropriations:
271
135
406
339
67
with
N/A
this
Previous
project
editions
will
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page
No
100
Il.
COMPONENT/
12. DATE
I
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
I
IAIR FORCE
generated)
IS. AREA CONST I
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
/AIR FORCE
I COST INDEX
I
~EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
MATERIEL COMMAND
0.82
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
STRENGTH
1 OFF1 EN-L 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
a. As of 30 SEP 99
112861 56221 32891
1 551
27613701
10,898
b. End FY 2005
112531 55321 3181
1 551
27613701
10,667
7. INVENTORY'DATA"($OOOj
Acreage:
( 453,594)
la- Total
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
3,800,352
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
IC- Authorization
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
8,940
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002) b
10,800
le. Authorization
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
9,700
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
71,800
Ih. Grand Total:
3,901,592
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
CMPL
($000)
I1212-213
PRECISION
GUIDED MUNITIONS
1,162
SM
3,340
TURN KEY
MAINTENANCE
FACILITY
I
1721-312
UPGRADE DORMITORY
72 RM
5,600
TURN KEY
TOTAL:
8,940
i
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1390-915
COMMAND & CONTROL TEST
6,224
SM 10,800
OPERATIONS CENTER
I
TOTAL:
10,800
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
1141-165
EXPLOSIVE
ORDNANCE DISPOSAL
1,183
SM
2,200
COMPLEX
I
1730-441
TRAINING
AND EDUCATION CENTER
4,366
SM
7,500
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Air Armament
Center@AC)is
responsible
lfor
development,
acquisition,
testing,
deployment
and sustainment
of
/conventional
and nuclear
air-delivered
weapons.
Units
at Eglin
are a test
I
an air base wing,
a fighter
wing with
F-15s,
the UAV Battlelab,
and
I
I wing,
la space
surveillance
squadron.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
FY 2001
I
I
Air pollution:
b.
Water
pollution:
aC.
Occupational
safety
Other
Environmental:
d.
Real Property
Maintenance
MILITARY
(computer
I
3,550,ooo
3,150,000.
and health:
Backlog
1
I
0
0
This
Installation
17,596
I
1r2-
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
101
Il.
I
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FLORIDA
CATEGORY CODE17.
212-213
9.
I
I
I
I
]U/MIQUANTITY
PRECISION
GUIDED
MAINTENANCE
FACILITY
ZJPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
PAVEMENTS
INTRUSION
DETECTION
SYSTEM
RELOCATE BUILDING
1279
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
POTAL CONTRACT COST
;UPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
rOTAL REQUEST
roTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
(10.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Imasonry
walls,
sloped
metal
roof,
high
Ihoists,
concrete
vault,
paint
room and
[paint
room emission
reduction
system,
(power and explosives
safety
items,
and
lone facility
(767 SM).
IAir Conditioning:
279 KW.
2,036
SM
I
I
FTFA963030
COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
MUNITIONS
111.
REQUIREMENT:
(PROJECT:
Construct
DATA
(4. PROJECT TITLE
[PRECISION
GUIDED MUNITIONS
[MAINTENANCE
FACILITY
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
I
I
7.28.06
PROJECT
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE,
5. PROGRAM ELEMENTIG.
I
1
MILITARY
ADEQUATE:
If= I
I
1,162
3,340
I
I
UNIT
COST
1 COST
) ($000)
I
1,7401
ILS
ILS
ILS
ILS
ILS
I SM
I
767
1
1
I
I
120
I
2,022
1,142
( 350)
( 150)
( 250)
(
50)
( 250)
(
92)
3,164
3,164
180
3,344
3,340
I
Reinforced
concrete
and
bay roll
up doors
(four bays),
administration
areas.
Includes
power converter
to simulate
aircraft
all necessary
support.
Demolish
874
SM
SUBSTANDARD:
767 SM
a precision
guided
munitions
(PGM) maintenance
facility.
(Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
A facility
is required
to support
maintenance
on
developmental
precision
guided
munitions
and missile
systems.
The
proposed
multi-bay
facility
will
be used to assemble,
repair,
test
and
inspect
all
guided
munitions
assets
in a central
location.
Includes
wide
lbay doors to accommodate
all-up-round
(AUR) containers,
and substantial
Idividing
walls
and other
explosive
safety
standards
requirements
to allow
(multiple
munitions
operations
and support/administrative
functions
to
Icontinue
during
explosive
operations.
This facility
will
allow
the Air
[Force to move leading
edge technology
programs
such as AIM-9X,
Advanced
IMedium
Range Air-To-Air
Missile
(AMRAAM ), AGM-130,
and Miniature
Munitions
ITechnology
Development
(MMTD) out of substandard
facilities.
Relocate
Iexisting
storage
shed to another
location.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
facilities
currently
used for missile
and
(PGM maintenance
are outdated,
too small
and not designed
to support
Iincreasing
PGM and missile
maintenance
workloads.
The facilities
do not
/have the required
pneumatic
and electrical
systems
and the bay doors are
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page
No 102
I
1
11. COMPONENT!
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
13. INSTALLATION
I
IEGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
[PRECISION
mIDED MUNITIONS
MAINTENANCE
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
FACILITY
(2.
I
DATE
PROJECT
NUMBER )
I
FTFA963030
[not large
enough to accommodate
the AUR containers.
The combination
of
/facility
construction
and explosive
safety
rules
prevent
simultaneous
Iexplosive
and non-explosive
operations,
causing
delays
and lost
[productivity.
These facilities
are overcrowded
and lack the environmental
Icontrols
required
to perform
timely
corrosion
control
within
the munitions
lstorage
area.
Assets must be scheduled
with an outside
agency and then
/loaded,
transported,
prepped,
and painted,
and finally
returned
to
service.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Precision-guided
munitions
maintenance
support
Iwill
continue
to be performed
in existing
inadequate
facilities.
IMunitions
techicians
will
continue
to work around obstacles
and build
[work-arounds
into
their
procedures.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
An economic
analysis
has been
Iprepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
revitalization,
land status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of
lthe respective
alternatives,
new construction
was found to be the most
Icost
efficient
over the life
of the project.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Co1
[Quincy
Purvis,
(850) 882-2876.
Precision
Guided Munitions
Maintenance
IFacility:
1,162SM = 12,504SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
103
12.
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
]AIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATE
I
DATA
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
JEGLIN
AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
PRECISION
GUIDED
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
Estimated
FLORIDA
15.
MUNITIONS
MAINTENANCE
I
FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
)
I
FTFA963030
DATA:
Design
Data:
I
(1)
(2)
Project
to be accomplished
Basis:
Standard
or Definitive
(a)
(b)
Where Design
Was Most
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
Used
NO
N/A
-
/
(3)
lb-
[other
Design
167
Allowance
(4)
Construction
Start
00 DEC
01 FEB
(5)
Construction
Completion
02 JUN
(6)
Energy
(3a)
Construction Contract Award Date
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
with
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
Y
be performed
be provided
from
N/A
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
104
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROGRAM
DATE
I
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
(AIR FORCE
I COST INDEX1
0.82
MATERIEL COMMAND
[EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
I
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
1 OFF/ ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL ]CIVl
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
I STRENGTH
I 551 27613701 lo,8981
la- As of 30 SEP 99
112861 56221 32891
1
I
lb. End FY 2005
112531 55321 31811
1 551
27613701
lo,6671
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
I
I
Ih.
Total
Acreage:
( 453,594)
Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
Planned
In Next Three Program
Years:
Remaining
Deficiency:
Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS
ICATEGORY
CODE
REQUESTED
IN THIS
PROJECT
PROGRAM:
3,800,352
0
8,940
10,800
(FY 2002)
I
9,700
71,800
3,901,592
I
I
FY 2001
TITLE
COST
($000)
SCOPE
DESIGN STATUS 1
START
CMPL 1
__
I
I-
1212-213
I
Projects:
OPERATIONS
Future
I
1,162
Projects:
SM
3,340
TURN KEY
FACILITY
Included
in
the
COMMAND & CONTROL TEST
I
1141-165
MUNITIONS
UPGRADE DORMITORY
Future
1390-915
19b.
GUIDED
MAINTENANCE
1721-312
)9a.
PRECISION
72 RM
5,600
TURN KEY
TOTAL :
8,940
Following
Program
(FY 2002)
6,224
SM 10,800
/
CENTER
Typical
Planned
Next
Three
Years:
1,183
SM
2,200
4,366
SM
7,500
EXPLOSIVE ORDNANCE DISPOSAL
COMPLEX
TRAINING
AND EDUCATION CENTER
1730-441
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Air Armament
Center(AAC)is
responsible
lfor development,
acquisition,
testing,
deployment
and sustainment
of
Iconventional
and nuclear
air-delivered
weapons.
Units
at Eglin
are a test
wing with F-15s,
the UAV Battlelab,
and
I wing, an air base wing, a fighter
la space surveillance
squadron.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
I
112.
a.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
bd.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
3,550,ooo
3,150,000
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
0
0
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
17,596
Page
No
105
I
(
I
1.
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION
Fy 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
CODE17.
I
721-312
9.
UPGRADE DORMITORY
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ASBESTOS REMOVAL
REPLACE ROOF
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
TOTAL REQUEbT
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
PROJECT TITLE
I
I
IUPGRADE DORMITORY
(72 RM)
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO))
14.
FLORIDA
CATEGORY
ITEM
(72 RM)
I
DATA
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE,
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT)6.
I
7.28.06
I
PROJECT
I
FTFA003009
I
COST ESTIMATES
I
I
IU/MIQUANTITY
ISM I 2,800
AND OVERHEAD
(5.7%
)
I
5,600
7-UNIT
COST
( ($000)
)
COST
8601
I
I
I=
ILS
ILS
ILS
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
!!
1
I
I
2,408
2,900
(
150)
50)
300)
5,308
~ 303
5,611
5,600
1
1
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Convert
existing
dormitory
to
(room-bath/kitchen-room
modules
and upgrade
mechanical
and electrical
[systems,
interior
and exterior
finishes,
bathroom
fixtures,
laundry
rooms,
land fire
protection
of Wing 'D' building
19.
Includes
asbestos
removal,
Iutilities,
pavements,
site
improvements,
replace
existing
roof system,
and
)a11 necessary
support.
/Air Conditioning:
310 KW. Grade Mix:
72 El-E4.
110.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT: 1,049 RM ADEQUATE:
534 RM SUBSTANDARD:
IPROJECT:
Upgrade
dormitory.
(Current
Mission)
588 RM
(REQUIREMENT:
A major Air Force objective
is to provides
unaccompanied
lenlisted
personnel
with housing
conducive
to their
proper
rest,
relaxation
land personal
well-being.
Properly
designed
and furnished
quarters
(providing
some degree
of individual
privacy
are essential
to the
[successful
accomplishment
of .the increasingly
complicated
and important
Ijobs
thes e people
must perform.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
The facility
to be upgraded
was constructed
in 1954.
(The existing
inadequate
heating,
ventilation
and air conditioning
(HVAC)
Isystem
for this
dormitory
has created
a warm, moist
environment
that
(promotes
mold and mildew
growth,
making
living
conditions
unhealthy.
The
/existing
HVAC system consists
of individual
fan-coil
cooling
units
which
[are suspended
from the ceiling.
These individual
fan-coil
units
do not
/provide
adequate
cooling
capacity
or humidity
control
for living
quarters,
[are difficult
to maintain,
waste energy,
are noisy,
and often
drip
Icondensed
moisture
onto the carpet,
room furshings,
and personal
[belongings
of the occupants.
The roof leaks
into
the rooms and compounds
(moisture
and mildew
problems.
There are collapsed
ceilings,
rotted
pipes,
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
NO
106
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
jAIR FORCE
j
13. INSTALLATION
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
(computer
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
I
IEGLIN AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
FLORIDA
[UPGRADE
RM)
I
CONSTRUCTION
DORMITORY
(72
15.
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
FTFA003009
I
I
land ruined
interior
finishes.
telephone
and electrical
Television,
[conduits
run along exterior
walls,
creating
safety
and maintenance
Jproblems.
Bathroom
exhaust
fans are inadequately
sized and improperly
Ilocated
to ventilate
odors and moisture.
The water heaters
and
[distribution
systems
are inefficient,
taking
too long to deliver
hot water
to the bathrooms.
Asbestos
containing
materials
pose a health
hazard
to
dorm occupants
and operations
and maintenance
personnel.
The existing
facility
also does not comply with the new uniform
barracks
construction
standards.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Substandard
living
conditions
will
persist
and
morale,
productivity,
and career
satisfaction
of the enlisted
force will
continue
to be degraded.
This facility
will
require
increased
maintenance
and will
continue
to fail
to meet DOD standards
and national
building
code
requirements.
ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in the new
uniform
barracks
construction
standard
known as l'one-plus-one,'l
established
by OSD. All known alternative
options
were considered
during
the development
of this
project.
No other
option
could meet the mission
requirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was needed or performed.
FY
1998 Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM conducted:
$768~.
FY 1999 Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM conducted:
$780K.
Future
Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM conducted
(estimated):
FYOO: $810~;
~~01: $840K; ~Y02:
$880K; FY03:
$900K.
Base
Civil
Engineer:
Co1 Quincy
Purvis,
(805) 882-2876
Upgrade
dormitory
2,800SM = 30,128SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
1
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
107
Il.
COMPONENT\
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
12. DATE
I
PROJECT DATA
I
JEGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IUPGRADE DORMITORY (72 RM)
112.
I
/
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
I
PROJECT NUMBER 1
I
FTFA003009
DATA:
Design
Data:
a(1)
(2)
(3)
(3a)
(4)
I
15.
Project
to be accomplished
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design
Was Most
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
-
NO
Used
I
N/A
-
Design Allowance
Construction Contract AwardDate
Construction
Start
280
00 DEC
01 FEB
(5)
Construction
02 OCT
(6)
Energy
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
lb.
Equipment
associated
lother
appropriations:
with
N/A
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
be performed
be provided
Y
from
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
108
1.
COMPONENT1
12.
FY 2001
I
AIR
13.
FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
MILITARY
(computer
generated)
FLORIDA
14. COMMAND
[AIR
FORCE SPECIAL
~oPERATIONS
comma
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
LOCATION
I
IEGLIN
AUXILIARY
FIELD
~0
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
a. As of 30 SEP 99
b. End FY 2005
PROGRAM
CONSTRUCTION
9,
1851-147
1851-147
UPGRADE
DEFENSE
I
ROADS
ROAD
3,140
0.82
SUPPORTED
ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL [CIVl
OFF1
56531
5311
I 211
1 6171
56091
5361
221
t 6171
7. INVENTORY
DATA
($000)
(
6,634)
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
ACCESS
ACCESS
AREA CONST(
COST INDEX1
15.
1 OFF1
111181
(11421
Total
Acreage:
Inventory
Total
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
IC.
Id. Authorization
Requested In This Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
If. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
(h. Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
[CATEGORY
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
I-
Ia*
lb.
1
DATE
I
ENL l'=Vl
5491
731
5491
731
TOTAL
8,5621
8,5481
I
190,548
0
7,960
(FY 2002)
6,409
19,300
0
I
1
224,217
COST
($000)
LS
SM
5,600
2,360
7,960
DESIGN STATUS
START
-CMPL
JAN
99
AUG
JAN 99
TOTAL:
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program (FY 2002)
1130-835
ADD TO SECURITY FORCE
375 SM
1,475
OPERATIONS FACILITY
I
1131-111
ADD/ALTER BASE NETWORK CONTROL
1,850
SM
2,567
CENTER COMPLEX
I
1730-142
FIRE STATION
1,700
SM
2,367
TOTAL:
6,409
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned Next Three Years:
1721-312
DORMITORY
144
RM
I
9,900
(721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
9,400
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
Headquarters
Air Force Special
loperations
Command; a special
operations
wing with
~AC-l3O/MC-l3O/MH-53/MH-6O/UH-l
special
operations
squadrons;
Air Force
ISpecial
Operations
School;
a special
tactics
group;
Air Combat Command's
[command and control
evaluation
group;
a RED HORSE squadron;
Air Force
ICombat Weather Center;
air ground operations
school,
and the Joint
Warfare
Center.
11.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
1
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog This
0
0
0
0
;:
DD FORM
1390,
1 DEC
76
Previous
editions
Installation
are
obsolete.
001
SEP 00)
34,476
Page No
109
1
I
I
11. COMPONENT/
DATE
12.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
(computer qenerated)
FORCE
TITLE
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT
13. INSTALLATION
I
I
IDEFENSE
AccEss
ROAD
IEGLIN
AUX FIELD
9, FLORIDA
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
I
I
I
2.75.96.F
851-147
FTEV003005
9. COST ESTIMATES
IAIR
I
ITEM
ILS I
ISM I
I
ACCESS CONTROLS
LAND AQuIsITIoN
(RIGHT
WETLANDS
MITIGATION
I
3,100
(
I
ILS I
OF WAY)
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
TOTAL
REQUEST
TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
(
COST
I
AND OVERHEAD
ILS
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
1
2,360
( UNIT
IU/MIQUANTITYI
[DEFENSE
ACCESS ROAD
( ROAD
[SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1
I
COST($OOO)
COST
(
($000)
I 1,147
3701
(1,147)
I 1,085
I
( 100)
1
( 385)
1 ( 600)
I 2,232
I
1
(
1
I
1
1
1
(5.7%)
I
I
I
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Site preparation,
2 inch
[asphalt
pavement,
curbs,
gutters,
and sidewalks.
Relocate
utilities
and
ltraffic
signals.
Provide
storm drainage.
Includes
aquisition
of
right-of-way,
demolition,
and necessary
disposal.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
(PROJECT:
Upgrade access roads.
(Current
Mission).
IREQUIREMENT:
Base road system improvements
are needed to support
[increased
traffic
resulting
from Special
Operations
Forces
(SOF)
[revitalization.
The lack of capacity
causes significant
traffic
delays
Iduring
rush hour,
requiring
the use of additional
personnel
to direct
Itraffic.
A new Defense Access Road is urgently
needed.
This requirement
lhas been certified
as important
to national
defense,
per Title
23 USC 210,
[necessitated
by expansion
of existing
Air Force activities
which result
in
la significant
impact on the adjacent
highways.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
road system was constructed
for a base
Ipopulation
of 2000 to 3000 personnel.
The base population
has tripled
[since
then.
A new east side community center
has attracted
many retired
land active
duty patrons
and increased
traffic
flow dramatically.
The
[present
road network
cannot adequately
support
the increased
traffic
counts have increased
by 22 percent
at the main gate and
If1 ows. Traffic
lover
190 percent
at the east gate in the past five
years.
IIMPACT
IF NOT PROVIDED:
Unacceptable
levels
of congestion
will
occur due
/to increased
traffic
through
the east gate.
Traffic
accidents
and
Ipedestrian
hazards
at intersections
will
worsen as traffic
volumes
increase.
There
have
been
27
traffic
accidents
at
the
intersection
of
I
/Lovejoy
and Hill
Avenues in the past two years.
JADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria
specified
in Air Force
110.
DD FORM
1391,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
I
110
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
iAIR FORCE
i
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qeneratedl
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATA
12.
I
DATE
I
I
IEGLIN AUX FIELD 9,
14. PROJECT TITLE
DEFENSE
ACCESS
I
FLORIDA
15.
I
ROAD
PROJECT
NUMBER
FTEV003005
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements.tO
All known
alternative
options
/were
considered
during
the development
of this
project.
No other
option
Icould
meet the mission
requirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was
Iperformed.
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Funds to
Iprovide
the Defense
Access
Road are required
under
authorization
contained
(in Title
23 USC 210,as
amended.
BASE CIVIL
ENGINEER:
Lt Co1 Hamill
(850)
1884-7701.
Defense
Access
Road:
3140 SM = 3770 SY
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page
No
I
)
111
11. COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2OOI MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
12. DATE
I
PROJECT DATA
I
IEGLIN AUX FIELD 9, FLORIDA
14. PROJECT TITLE
(5.
I
PROJECT NUMBER
FTEV003005
DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD
112.
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a.
Estimated
Design Data:
(1)
I
(2)
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
* (cl Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
*(d)
Date 35% Designed.
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 01 1
costs
-f I
35% 1
00 JAN 01 1
00 SEP 30 1
be performed
I
Used
-
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other Design
Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
(3a) Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
(3)
(5)
Construction
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
142
70
212
192
20
01 JAN
01 MAR
Completion
01 SEP
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
;b.
Equipment
associated
Jother
appropriations:
1
with
N/A
this
Previous
project
editions
will
are
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
obsolete.
from
Page No 112
12. DATE
1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
15. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
COST INDEX\
IAIR
FORCE
SPECIAL
I
I
0.82
IOPERATIONS
comma
IEGLIN AUXILIARY
FIELD NO 9, FLORIDA
1
SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
PERSONNEL
I
L
16.
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 EN'L [CIV] OFF1 ENL ICIV]
TOTAL
STRENGTH
a. As of 30 SEP 99
111181 56531
5311
I 211 I 6171 5491 731 8,562
b. End FY 2005
111421 56091
5361
221
1 6171 5491 731 8,548
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
6,634)
la. Total Acreage:
(b. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
190,548
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
Ic.
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
7,960
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
6,409
le. Authorization
If. Planned,In
Next Three Program
Years:
19,300
Deficiency:
0
lg. Remaining
Ih. Grand Total:
224,217
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
I
[CATEGORY
DESIGN STATUS 1
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
~($000)
~START
-CMPL 1
II
1851-147
UPGRADE ACCESS ROADS
LS
5,600
JAN 99 AUG 001
1851-147
DEFENSE ACCESS ROAD
3,140 SM
2,360
JAN 99 SEP 001
TOTAL:
7,960
(9a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1130-835
ADD TO SECURITY FORCE
375 SM
1,475
OPERATIONS FACILITY
I
1131-111
ADD/ALTER BASE NETWORK CONTROL
1,850 SM
2,567
CENTER COMPLEX
I
1730-142
FIRE STATION
1,700 SM
2,367
TOTAL:
6,409
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
9,900
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
9,400
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
Air Force Special
[Operations
Command; a special
operations
wing with
(AC-13O/MC-l3O/MH-53/MH-6O/UH-l
special
operations
squadrons;
Air Force
(
ISpecial
Operations
School;
a special
tactics
group;
Air Combat Command's
I
[command and control
evaluation
group;
a RED HORSE squadron;
Air Force
(Combat Weather
Center;
air ground
operations
school,
and the Joint
Warfare
)
ICenter.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
0
0
0
0
2
and health:
Backlog
This
Installation
I
34,476
J
DD FORM 1390,
I
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
page
No
113
Il.
I
IAIR
13.
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
PROJECT
I
1
2.75.96
851-147
9.
TITLE
I
I
Iu/MIQUANTITY
(UPGRADE ACCESS ROADS
1 IMPROVE CODY AVENUE
ROAD
1 IMPROVE INDEPENDENCE
1 REPLACE GUARD HOUSE/RELOCATE
FENCE
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
RELOCATION
1 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
I DEMOLITION
1SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
[TOTAL REQUEST
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
COST($OOO)
ILS I
5,600
I
ISM 1 31,000
ISM 1 35,500
LS
UNIT
COST
49
49
II
‘I
LS
LS
LS
(5.7%)
1
1
(
200
1,825
( 525
(
1
/
I
I
1
1
I
COST
($000)
3,459
(1,519
(1,740
(1,100
1
/
1
I
I
FTEV943011
COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
1
I
i4IUPGRADE ACCESS ROADS
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT
I
I
DATA
_
AND LOCATION
JEGLIN AUX FIELD 9, FLORIDA
15. PROGRAM ELEMENTIG.
CATEGORY CODE17.
I
PROJECT
I
1
)I
)I
200 .) I
5,284
5,284
~
301
5,585
5,600
I
I
10.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Widen Independence
east gate,
widen Cody Ave with median and turn lanes,
realign
Bartley
St and related
intersections.
Replace
guard house.
boundary
fence.
Construct
a new Defense
Access Road between
and Hill
Ave to replace
the current
access route.
Air Conditioning:
5 KW.
Rd from
Simpson
Ave,
Relocate
the east gate
I
I
I
)
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
IPROJECT:
Upgrade
access roads.
(Current
Mission).
IREQUIREMENT:
Base road system improvements
are needed to support
Iincreased
traffic
resulting
from Special
Operations
Forces
(SOF)
Irevitalization.
The lack of capacity
causes significant
traffic
delays
Iduring
rush hour,
requiring
the use of additional
personnel
to direct
(traffic.
A new Defense Access Road is urgently
needed.
This requirement
[has been certified
as important
to national
defense,
per Title
23 USC 210,
/necessitated
by expansion
of existing
Air Force activities
which result
in
la significant
impact
on the adjacent
highways.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
road system was constructed
in the 1950's
(for a base population
of 2000 to 3000 personnel.
The base population
has
[tripled
since then.
A new east side community
center
has attracted
many
Iretired
and active
duty patrons
and increased
traffic
flow dramatically.
[The present
road network
cannot
adequately
support
the increased
traffic
ows
.
Traffic
counts
have
increased
by
22
percent
at
the
main
gate
and
I fl
lover 190 percent
at the east gate in the-past
five years.
JIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Unacceptable
levels
of congestion
will
occur due
[to increased
traffic
through
the east gate.
Traffic
accidents
and
pedestrian
hazards
at intersections
will
worsen as traffic
volumes
Ill.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
(
1
I
114
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
iAIR FORCE
i
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATA
(2.
I
DATE
I
I
I
IEGLIN AUX FIELD Y, FLORIDA
14. PROJECT TITLE
UPGRADE ACCESS
15.
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
FTEV943011
ROADS
increase.
There have been 27 traffic
accidents
at the intersection
of
ILovejoy
and Hill
Avenues
in the past
two years.
[ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
All known
alternative
options
Iwere
considered
during
the development
of this
project.
No other
option
(could
meet the mission
requirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was
Iperformed.
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
BASE CIVIL
IENGINEER:
Lt Co1 Hamill
(850)
884-7701.
Improve
Cody Avenue:
31,000
SM =
137,200
SY; Improve
Independence
Road:
35,500
SM = 42,600
SY.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
1
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
I
I
1
I
115
Il.
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
FY 2001
I
IAIR
13.
(12.
ACCESS
/
9,
PROJECT
DATA
I
qenerated)
FLORIDA
15.
PROJECT
I
I
1
NUMBER
FTEV943011
ROADS
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
CONSTRUCTION
AND LOCATION
I
IEGLIN
AUX FIELD
14. PROJECT TITLE
UPGRADE
MILITARY
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
DATA:
Design
Design, Bid, Build
Data:
a.
(1)
(2)
Status:
Date Design Started
(a)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
* (cl Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
(e)
Date Design Complete
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
Design
(b)
Where Design Was Most Recently
99 JAN 29 1
y I
costs
15% 1
99 DEC 30
00 AUG 15
Y
be performed
NO
N/A
Used -
($000)
(3)
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e) :
(a)
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(b)
All Other Design Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
(3a) Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
336
168
504
454
50
01 JAN
01 MAR
(5)
01 SEP
Construction
Completion
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
lb.
lother
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC
76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are obsolete.
from
Page No
116
12. DATE
I
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
(computer
generated)
15. AREA CONST
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
IAIR FORCE
I COST INDEX
I
SPACE COMMAND
0.92
[PATRICK AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
1 OFF] ENL 1 CIV
OFF] ENL lCIV/
OFF] ENL 1CIV1 TOTAL
a. As of 30 SEP 99
1 3411 11021 11671
1
I I
I
I
I 2,610
b. End FY 2005
1 3381 10701 12121
1 2,620
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Acreage:
(
2,341)
Ia* Total
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
2,810,316
lb- Inventory
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
Ic- Authorization
Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
12,970
e. Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
0
idIn Next Three Program
Years:
11,900
If- Planned
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
19,743
Ih. Grand Total:
2,854,929
1
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
[CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
CODE
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~
~START
-CMPL
!-
I
1730-441
I
DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
FACILITY
8,510
SM
12,970
TURN KEY
TOTAL
:
12,970
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Followinq
Proqram
(FY 2002) NONE
)9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1130-142
FIRE/CRASH
RESCUE STATION
3,125 SM
6,800
1141-456
SECURITY FORCES OPERATIONS
2,550 SM
5,100
P’HCILI’I’Y
I
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A space wing; the Air Force Technical
/Applications
Center;
DOD Equal Opportunity
Management
Institute
and an Air
IForce
Reserve
HH-60/H-130
rescue group.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
1
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
;:
and health:
Backlog
This
Installation
250,000
3,000,000
451,000
2,305,OOO
27,986
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 117
I
I
Il.
COMPONENT1
12. DATE
FY.2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
14, PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
IDEFENSE
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
I
IMANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
FACILITY
[PATRICK
AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
CATEGORY CODE(7. PROJECT NUMBER (8. PROJECT COST($OOO) (
15. PROGRAM ELEMENTj6.
I
I
I
I
SXHT993001
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
I UNIT
ITEM
IU/M~QUANTITY
COST
DEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT
I
I
t
INSTITUTE FACILITY
ISM I 8,510
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
LS
PAVEMENTS
LS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LS
DEMOLITION
SM
4,100
ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
LS
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION, INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
3.59.96
I
730-441
I
I
12,970
COST
($000)
9,957
(
(
(
(
(
2,312
770)
450)
250)
492)
350)
12,269
12,269
699
12,968
12,970
I
I
I
:
I
1
I
L
110.
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Facility
with reinforced
Iconcrete
foundation
and floor
slab,
precast
exterior
walls and roof
Isystem.
Includes
elevator,
utilities,
parking
and all necessary
systems
Ito support
an education
facility.
Provide
antiterrorism/force
protection
measures.
Demolish three
facilities
(4,100 SM).
IAir Conditioning:
933 KW.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
8,510 SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD: 5,576
SM
IPROJECT:
Construct
a Defense Equal Opportunity
Management Institute
I (DEOMI) Facility.
(Current
Mission).
IREQUIREMENT:
An adequate
facility
is required
to train
all DOD personnel
lin Equal Opportunity
(EO) and human relations.
Facility
requirements
/include
classroom
space, faculty
offices,
library,
support
functions,
Icomputer
room, study rooms, break rooms, and a multi-purpose
Iclassroom/conference
room/auditorium/ceremonies
room.
The Air Force is
lthe executive
agent for this DOD program.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
DEOMI was estabilished
at Patrick
AFB in September
(1971.
They are presently
located
in four facilities
on base, three
of
lwhich are located
in the runway clear
zone.
These facilities
are on
Iaverage
45 years old and were not intended
for the current
use.
Existing
Iclassroom
space is inadequate
to support
the current
class load.
Break
lareas and student
study areas are nonexistent.
The library
is inadequate
Ito house large
volumes of reference
materials.
Existing
lecture
halls
are
lnot large enough to hold the large classes
for orientation,
class
[lectures,
and other
events
such as graduation
ceremonies.
Faculty
offices
[are cramped and do not provide
adequate space for proper
class planning
or
jcounselinq.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 118
I
I
)
I
I
I
I
1
I
(1.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
12.
I
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
(PATRICK
AIR FORCE
14. PROJECT
TITLE
DEFENSE
EQUAL
BASE,
OPPORTUNITY
FLORIDA
MANAGEMENT
INSTITUTE
FACILITY
15.
PROJECT
1
SXHT993001
NUMBER
This is the only DOD organization
with the
[mission
of training
personnel
in the area of equal opportunity.
No other
Ifacilities
on PAFB or in the local
off-base
area can support
this
(requirement.
Without
this
facility
the Air Force will
not be able to
[support
the DEOMI training
requirements.
[ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
[Handbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements".
An economic analysis
has been
Iprepared
comparing alternatives
of new construction
and status
quo.
Based
Ion the present
value and benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
new
Iconstruction
was found to be the most cost effective
over the life
of the
/project.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 John Morrill,
DSN 854-4041.
DEOMI
(Facility:
8510 SM = 91,568 SF.
JIMPACT
IF
NOT
t
PROVIDED:
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No 119
(1.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
IAIR
13.
FORCE
INSTALLATION
I
IPATRICK
AIR FORCE BASE,
PROJECT
TITLE
14.
IDEFENSE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
I
112.
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
(1)
(2)
b.
other
Design
Project
DATE
1
DATA
FLORIDA
I
I
I a.
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE
FACILITY
15. PROJECT NUMBER
1
I
I
1
SXHT993001
:
Data:
to be accomplished
Basis:
Standard
or Definitive
(a)
(b)
Where Design Was Most
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
Used
NO
N/A
-
13)
Design
(3a)
Construction Contract Award Date
Allowance
01 JAN
(4)
Construction
Start
01 FEB
(5)
Construction
Completion
02
(6)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
648
DEC 76
with
N/A
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
are
Y
be performed
be provided
obsolete.
SEP
from
Page
No 120
12. DATE
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
JAIR FORCE
(5. AREA CONST
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
14. COMMAND
13.
[AIR
EDUCATION
I COST INDEX
I
0.82
ITYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
AND TRAINING
COMMAND
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
I
OFF] ENL [CIVl
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
J OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
I STRENGTH
la. As of 30 SEP 99
1 6061 28501
6181
371
I I 4
201 I 4,215
lb. End FY 2005
1 6051 28531
6161
371
1 841
201
1 4,215
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Acreage:
(
28,824)
la. Total
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
2,346,117
(30 SEP 99)
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
Ice Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
25,300
Id. Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
13,331
le. Authorization
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
13,300
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
17,000
Ih. Grand Total:
2,415,048
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~START
-CMPL 1
II
1171-212
F-22 OPERATIONS
FACILITY
2,250
SM
6,800
JAN 99 SEP 001
1211-111
F-22 ADD/ALTER
MAINTENANCE
5,515
SM 18,500
JAN 99 AUG 001
FACILITIES
I
TOTAL:
25,300
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1211-177
F-22 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMU
5,055
SM 10,931
AND HANGAR
I
1211-179
F-22 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
934 SM
2,400
HANGAR
I
TOTAL :
13,331
(9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1171-152
WEAPONS CONTROLLER TRAINING
3,555
SM
5,200
SCHOOL
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
8,100
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A fighter
wing with
three
F-15 squadrons
1
[responsible
for training
all
F-15 aircrews;
Air
Combat Command's
I
[Headquarters
First
Air
Force,
a weapons
evaluation
group,
and Southeast
/AirDefense
Sector;
the Air Force
Civil
Engineering
Support
Agency;
and an
I
[Air
National
Guard air
defense
detachment
(~-16
aircraft).
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
FY
2001
I
Air
/
I
112.
pollution:
pollution:
Occupational
safety
cd.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
b.
a-
Water
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
20
0
0
0
31,437
Page
No
121
11.
12. DATE
I
COMPONENT1
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
(computer
generated)
~
PROJECT
TITLE
AND LOCATION
14.
13.
IF-22
ADD/ALTER
MAINTENANCE
I
IFACILITIES
JTYNDALL
AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
I
IAIR
FY 2001
!
I
FORCE
j
INSTALLATION
I
2.72.19
211-111
1
I
I
I
18,500
XLWUOO3002
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
IF-22 ADD/ALTER MAINTENANCE FACILITIES
LOW OBSERVABLE/COMPOSITE MAINTENANCE
UPGRADE MAINTENANCE DOCK
FIELD TRAINING DETACHMENT
ISUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
PAVEMENTS/DEMOLISH PAVEMENTS
HVAC (LAMINAR FLOW)/PLENUM DOORS
FORCE PROTECTION/SECURITY
ISUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
ITOTAL REQUEST
[TOTAL
REQUEST (ROUNDED)
!
IU/M~QUANTITY[
I-'
1 6,107
ISM I 2,990
ISM I 2,370
747
ISM I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ILS
ILS
ILS
ILS
ILS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1 U-NIT 1
COST
COST
1
1
1
1
( ($0001
7,533
I
1,760(
( 5,262)
917)
3871 (
1,8131
( 1,354)
I
9,733
I
288)
250)
1 ( 2,045)
I (
I (
1 (
I
I
6,950)
200)
17,266
L---17,266
984
18,250
18,500
I
110.
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Construct
a two-bay high-bay
[hangar with concrete
foundation,
steel
frame,
climate
control,
fire
[protection,
and security
provisions
for low observable/composite
[maintenance.
Upgrade maintenance
hangar by adding climate
control,
fire
Iprotection,
and security
provisions.
Construct
high-bay
addition
with
Iconcrete
walls and foundation
and metal roof for maintenance
training.
[Air Conditioning:
415 KW.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT: As required.
[PROJECT:
F-22 add/alter
maintenance
facilities.
(New Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
Modify
existing
buildings
and construct
new facilities
to
Iprovide
adequately
sized,
configured,
and secure maintenance
facilities
to
Isupport
the beddown of the next generation,
multi-roled
F-22 fighter
for
lpilot
training
at Tyndall
AFB.
The F-22 is designed
with state
of the art
Itechnology
and composite
materials
to meet stealth
mission requirements.
IThese composites
have unique equipment
and materials
for maintenance
and
Irepair
that
require
specialized
facilities
for training
and maintenance
/activities.
Due to the mission of the F-22 and the quick burn rate of
Icomposite
materials,
the maintenance
and maintenance
training
facilities
Imust have a controlled
environment,
fire
protection,
and security
Iprovisions.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
Tyndall
AFB does not have adequate
or excess
Ifacilities
to beddown the F-22.
It will
replace
the F-15 in a phased
[program starting
in FY03.
The existing
corrosion
control
facility
is
Isimilar
to the type of facility
required
for composite
material
[maintenance,
but it does not meet the F-22 requirements
for size and fire
IProtection
and it is needed to support
the F-15.
A new 2-bay,
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
I
I
122
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
(AIR
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
13.
I
ITYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IF-22
ADD/ALTER
PROJECT
DATA
FLORIDA
MAINTENANCE
15.
I
FACILITIES
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
I
XLWUOO3002
IEPA-compliant
facility
that
meets
all major
low observable
restoration
and
Icomposite
material
repair
requirements
is essential
in maintaining
the
[modern
materials
and coating
used on this
aircraft.
Of the five
hangars
[on Tyndall,
none meet F-22 requirements
for
temperature
and humidity
Icontrol,
for
laminar
air
flow
for fire
protection,
or for
security
All hangars
have natural
ventilation
and heating
capability
IP rovisions.
[but have no cooling
capacity
and no humidity
control.
Existing
water
Ideluge
fire
protection
systems
must be upgraded
with
an aqueous
film
[forming
foam (AFFF)
fire
protection
system,
Existing
hangar
configuration
land door mechanisms
do not provide
the means to limit
access.
The
[existing
F-15 field
training
facility
is not large
enough
to accommodate
[all
training
devices
and provisions
of the F-22 maintenance
training
/program.
The engine,
landing
gear,
and forward
fuselage
trainers
all
Irequire
a high-bay
area.
In addition,
the existing
facility
does not have
Iclassified
classrooms
or storage
areas.
/IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
F-22 pilot
training
cannot
operate
from Tyndall
IAFB without
maintenance
facilities
available
with
the proper
environmental
Icontrols,
fire
protection,
and security
measures
to provide
necessary
(maintenance
and maintenance
training.
Low observable
coatings
and
Icomposite
materials
to provide
the stealth
capability
will
be compromised.
IAircraft
availablity
will
be limited
resulting
from aircraft
down for
Imaintenance
because
of limited
hangar
space.
Personnel
will
not be fully
Itrained
due to the lack
of secure
training
facilities.
[ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
Ireasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
(status
quo, add to and
Ialter,
and new construction)
indicates
that
add to and alter
is the only
Ioption
that
will
satisfy
operational
requirements.
Because
of this,
a
Ifull
economic
analysis
was not performed.
A certificate
of exception
has
Ibeen prepared.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 Arvil
E.
White
III
(850)
1283-3283.
F-22 Maintenance
Facilities:
6,107
SM = 65,711
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
123
11. COMPONENT1
I
I
iAIR FORCE
i
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
JTYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT
DATA
ADD/ALTER
15.
I
MAINTENANCE
FACILITIES
112.
a.
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(1)
(2)
(3)
I
DATE
I
I
FLORIDA
I
IF-22
I
12.
I
NUMBER
XLWUOO3002
I
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 22
Y
15%
99 DEC 30
00 AUG 30
be performed
Y
costs
-
NO
Used
-
N/A
I
($000) I
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
of Plans
and Specifications
(a) Production
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
(c)
Contract
(d)
In-house
(e)
@a) Construction Contract Award Date
(4)
Construction
Start
1110
555
1665
1388
277
00 NOV
01 JAN
(5)
03 JAN
Construction
Completion
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
;b.
Equipment
associated
[other
appropriations:
1
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
* (c)
Percent
Complete
as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
*IdI
Date
Design
Complete
(e)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(f)
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
(b)
Where Design
PROJECT
with
N/A
this
project
will
with
1
)
1
1
1
Parametric
35% design
be provided
from
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 124
,
12. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
IAIR FORCE
(computer
generated)
15. AREA CONST
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION
COST INDEX
[AIR
EDUCATION
I
I
0.82
AND TRAINING
COMMAND
JTYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
(6. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
I
STRENGTH
1 OFF/ ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
OFF! ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
I
la. As of 30 SEP 99
1 6061 28501
6181
371
I I 841 201 I 4,215
201
1 4,215
lb. End FY 2005
) 6051 28531
6161
371
1 84)
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
28,824)
Ia- Total Acreage:
2,346,117
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
IC25,300
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
13,331
(FY 2002)
le. Authorization
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
13,300
Iflg. Remaining
Deficiency:
17,000
Ih. Grand Total:
2,415,048
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
[CATEGORY
DESIGN STATUS
COST
1 CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~START
-CMPL 1
I
I
1171-212
1211-111
I
F-22 OPERATIONS FACILITY
F-22 ADD/ALTER
MAINTENANCE
FACILITIES
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the
1211-177
F-22 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AMU
AND HANGAR
I
1211-179
F-22 FUEL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE
HANGAR
I
2,250
5,515
SM
SM
6,800
18,500
TOTAL :
25,300
Following
Program
(FY
5,055
SM 10,931
934 SM
JAN 99
JAN 99
SEP OOi
AUG 001
2002)
2,400
TOTAL :
13,331
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next
Three Years:
1171-152
WEAPONS CONTROLLER TRAINING
3,555
SM
5,200
SCHOOL
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM
8,100
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A fighter
wing with
three
F-15 squadrons
[responsible
for training
all
F-15 aircrews;
Air
Combat Command's
IHeadquarters
First
Air
Force,
a weapons
evaluation
group,
and Southeast
(AirDefense
Sector;
the Air Force
Civil
Engineering
Support
Agency;
and an
IAir
National
Guard air
defense
detachment
(F-16
aircraft).
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
I
I
112.
I
Air pollution:
;:
Water
pollution:
Occupational
safety
cd.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
and
health:
Backlog
This
Installation
20
0
0
0
31,437
I
1
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 125
I
I
I