Department of the Air Force
Military Construction and Family
Housing Program
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2000
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
President’s Budget
Page Number
General
Table of Contents ................................................................
1
Program Summary ..............................................................
3
Militarv Construction
State Summary (List of Projects) .......................................
5
New Mission/Current Mission Exhibit ..............................
13
Installation Index ................................................................
21
Special Program Considerations:
Statements .........................................................................
23
Congressional Reporting Requirements ........................
24
Research and Development .............................................
26
Third Party Financing .....................................................
27
Appropriation Language ....................................................
29
Inside the United States Construction Projects.. ..............
31
Outside the United States Construction Projects.. ...........
231
Unspecified Minor Construction .......................................
259
Planning and Design ...........................................................
261
Working Capital Funds Construction Projects.. ..............
263
1
Inside the United States Construction Projects
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
(computer
generated)
15. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
IAIR
FORCE
I COST INDEX1
I
1.05
MATERIEL COMMAND
IHILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
OFF1 ENL
CIVl OFF] ENL ]CIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
(
(34891
4702(740(
23‘9821
a. As of 30 SEP 99
( 6771 38261 95481
134891 470217401
24,2771
b. End FY 2005
1 6641 38491 98331
INVENTORY
DATA
($000)
7.
(
6,973)
la- Total Acreage:
1,939,032
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
IC.
16,500
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
(FY 2002)
10,000
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
(f.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
34,300
0
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
1,999,832
Ih. Grand Total:
J
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
/CATEGORY
CODE
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
___
___
-CMPL )
l-
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
1211-159
I
FY 2001
C-130 CORROSION
FACILITY(WORKING
CONTROL
CAPITAL
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
1211-252
HYDRAULIC/PNEUDRAULIC
FACILITY
I
6,900
SM
16,500
TURN KEY
FUND)
in the
REPAIR
TOTAL:
16,500
Following
Program
(FY 2002)
4,647
SM 10,000
10,000
TOTAL:
(9b.
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
Future
Projects:
1171-625
COMBAT LOGISTICS
SUPPORT SQ
2,000
SM
3,600
TRAINING/STORAGE
FACILITY
I
(212-212
MISSILE
DEPOT MAINTENANCE
9,000
3,317
SM
FACILITY
I
1422-259
MISSILE
STORAGE FACILITY
3,535
SM 12,200
1721-312
DORMITORY
(144 RM)
144 RM
9,500
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Ogden Air Logistics
Center
which
is
Iresponsible
for
logistics
management,
support,
and depot-level
maintenance
[of tactical
missiles,
F-16 aircraft,
Minuteman and Peacekeeper
ICBMs;
IAN/FPS-117
radar,
composite
(including
B-2 composites),
power systems,
and
(software
workload;
a test
squadron with F-16, MH-60, and HC/NC-130
/aircraft;
an air base wing; an Air Combat Command fighter
wing with three
I~-16 squadrons;
and an Air Force Reserve fighter
wing with one F-16
Isquadron.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
I
112.
Air pollution:
Et: Water pollution:
Occupational
safety
and health:
cOther Environmental:
d.
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog This
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
0
1,100,000
0
Installation
are
obsolete.
6,000,OOO
8,903
Page No 203
I
I
I
/
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
I
IAIR
PROJECT
generated)
UTAH
CATEGORY
CODEl7.
_
PROJECT
TITLE
IC-130
CORROSION
CONTROL
IFACILITY(WORKING
CAPITAL
FUND)
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
COST($OOO))
I
I
7.28.96
DATE
I
DATA
14.
AND LOCATION
HILL AIR FORCE BASE,
5. PROGRAM ELEMENTl6.
I
1
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
13.
MILITARY
211-159
I
9.
COST
I
I
KRSM993014
16,500
t
t
ESTIMATES
:
ITEM
C-130
CORROSION
CONTROL
FACILITY
:
SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
TOTAL
REQUEST
~0m-i~
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
EQUIPMENT
FROM OTHER APPROPRIATIONS
I
I
I
IU/MIQUANTITYI
6,900
ISM I
(5.7%)
(NON-ADD)
I
I
ILS
I
ILS
ILS
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
I
I
/
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
( UNIT
cosT
1 2,000
COST
($000)
13,800
1,750
850)
(
600)
(
300)
(
15,550
15,550
16,436
16,500
(6,120
:
I
)I
I
1
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Multi-bay
structure
with
Iconcrete
floor
slab,
foundation,
and structural
steel
frame,
including
[aircraft
access pavement,
fire
suppression
system and all necessary
Isupport.
Includes
support
equipment preparation
and paint
mixing
room.
/Air Conditioning:
400 KW.
:
I
1
110.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
9,012
SM
ADEQUATE:
2,112
SM
SUBSTANDARD:
0
IPROJECT:
Construct
a C-130 corrosion
control
facility.
(Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
An adequately
sized,
environmentally
safe facility
is
Irequired
to perform
depot-level
corrosion
control
on C-130 aircraft.
This
Ifacility
must support
the periodic
depot maintenance
(PDM) as well as the
Iannual
recurring
drop-in
C-130 aircraft
requirements.
[CURRENT
SITUATION:
C-130
aircraft
corrosion
control
capacity
at Hill
AFB
(is inadequate
to accommodate the current
and projected
work load.
Hill
IAFB has been forced
to contract
out C-130 aircraft
corrosion
control
work
(because the existing
facility
is used 3 shifts-per-day,
7 days a week.
IContracting
out work requires
added preparation
and transport
time thus
(decreasing
the time aircraft
are available
to support
the C-130 mission.
IIn FY97 with a workload
of 48 PDM and 24 drop-in
aircraft,
eleven aircraft
lhad to be contracted
out for stripping
and painting
at an additional
cost
Jof $350,000.
Projected
work load will
require
a total
of 35 aircraft
to
/be contracted
out at a cost of $1,225,000
per year.
No residual
capacity
/is available
for scheduled
maintenance
of the facility
or the associated
(corrosion
control
equipment.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
There will
continue
to be a shortfall
in C-130
/corrosion
control
capacity
at Hill
AFB.
Corrosion
control
work will
[continue
to be contracted
out,
cost for depot-level
work will
increase,
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
page No
1
(
I
1
204
11.
I
[AIR
13.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
generated)
LOCATION
I
(HILL
AIR FORCE BASE,
PROJECT
TITLE
14.
UTAH
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
land additional
time delays will
occur in returning
mission
ready aircraft
It0 flying
status.
[ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IHandbook 32-1084,
An economic analysis
has been
"Facility
Requirements."
Iprepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
outsourcing,
and
[status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of the
Jrespective
alternatives,
new construction
was found to be the most cost
Iefficient
over the life
of the project.
The requirement
for this project
)was validated
by the Joint
Service
Depot Maintenance
Industrial
Military
lConstruction
Review on 20 May 98.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Co1 Per Korslund
,
1 (801)
777-3071.
C-130 Corrosion
Control
Facility:
6900SM = 74,244SF.
1
I
C-130
CORROSION
DD FORM
1391C,
CONTROL
DEC
76
FACILITY(WORKING
Previous
CAPITAL
editions
FUND)
are obsolete.
KRSM993014
Page No
I
(
I
1
I
I
I
I
205
(1.
COMPONENT\
I
IAIR
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
13.
12.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
IHILL AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
DATA
IC-130
I
CORROSION
(5.
CONTROL
SUPPLEMENTAL
112.
a.
Estimated
(1)
(2)
I
(3)
(3a)
(4)
FACILITY(WORKING
CAPITAL
FUND)
PROJECT
NUMBER
Design
Project
I
KRSM993014
to
Data:
be accomplished
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
Where Design
(b)
Definitive
Was Most
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
-
NO
Used
-
N/A
Design
Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
/
(6)
Energy
825
00 DEC
01 JUL
Completion
03 SEP
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
lb(other
appropriations:
I
with
EQUIPMENT
NOMENCLATURE
OUTFITTING
EQUIPMENT
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
y
be performed
be provided
I
1
($000) )
FISCAL
YEAR
APPROPRIATED
OR REQUESTED
FY2001
PROCURING
APPROPRIATION
DMAG
I
I
from
COST
6120
I
DD FORM 1391C,
(
DATA:
I
/
[INITIAL
I
UTAH
I
I
1
PROJECT
DATE
1
I
I
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No 206
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
PROGRAM
14. COMMAND
AND LOCATION
I
I
/
AREA CONSTI
COST INDEX1
0.92
15.
I
ILANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, VIRGINIA
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
1 SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
16. PERSONNEL
J OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL ]CIVl
OFF] ENL ICIV]
TOTAL
I STRENGTH
10,704(
12031(
65671
16871
(
Ia. As of 30 SEP 99
I
I 581 10712541
1
581
10712541
lo,6961
lb. End FY 2005
120301
65601
16871
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Acreage:
(
3,152)
Ia. Total
2,820,299
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30
SEP 99)
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
IcId. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
7,470
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
7,800
le. Authorization
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
33,009
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
47,013
Ih. Grand Total:
2,915,591
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
CODE
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
l____
__
-CMPL
I
I
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
19a.
Future
Projects:
1721-312
DORMITORY
Included
(96 RM)
in
the
96 RM
7,470
JAN 00
TOTAL :
7,470
Following
Program
(FY 2002)
96 RM
7,800
TOTAL:
7,800
Next Three Years:
60,892
SM 13,509
96 RM
7,900
SEP OC
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
1113-321
REPAIR EAST PARKING APRON
1721-312
DORMITORY
(96 RM)
(740-674
ADD TO AND ALTER FITNESS
4,520
SM
11,600
CENTER
(10.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
Air Combat Command;
a
/fighter
wing with
three
F-15 fighter
squadrons;
a C-21 unit;
an air
intelligence
group;
and the USAF Doctrine
Center.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
j
!
112.
ab.
cd.
Real
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
Occupational
safety
Other
Environmental:
Property
Maintenance
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
I
-:
0
81,000
and health:
Previous
3,300
0
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
34,169
Page
No
I
207
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
(AIR
13.
I
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND
PROJECT
DATA
I
generated)
14.
I
LOCATION
PROJECT
TITLE
[DORMITORY
(96 RM)
ILANGLEY
AIR FORCE BASE,
VIRGINIA
CATEGORY
CODE17.
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
I
I
I
I
721-312
MUHJO13001
1 2.75.96
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
JDORMITORY
(96 RM)
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
SPECIAL
FOUNDATION
(PILING)
UPGRADE OF INFRASTRUCTURES
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT
COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
IU/M\QUANTITY~
ISM I 3,168
I
I
ILS I
I=
I
ILS I
II X
11X
OVERHEAD
DATE
(5.7%)
COST($OOO)
7,470
I UNIT I
COST
1 1,525
1
I
f-
COST
1
($000)
4,831 :
2,240
( 380)
( 365)
( 270)
( 275)
( 950) /
7,071
7,071
403
7,474
7,470 I
/
I
Description
or Proposed Construction:
Three-story
dormitory
with
pile
foundation
and floor
slabs,
masonry walls,
and sloped roofs.
Includes
room-bath/kitchen-room
modules,
laundry
rooms, storage,
lounge
Also
areas,
site preparation,
and all other
supporting
facilities.
includes
upgrade of existing
infrastructure
(electrical,
water,
sewage,
and storm drainage)
to support
this and follow-on
deficit
dormitories.
Air Conditioning:
300 KW. Grade Mix:
96 El-E4.
10.
: 11.
REQUIREMENT:
1,427 RM ADEQUATE:
760 RM SUBSTANDARD: 0
Construct
a dormitory.
(Current
Mission)
is to provides
unaccompanied
IREQUIREMENT: A major Air Force objective
enlisted
personnel
with housing
conducive
to their
proper
rest,
Irelaxation,
and personal
well-being.
Properly
designed
and furnished
Iquarters
providing
some degree of individual
privacy
are essential
to the
Isuccessful
accomplishment
of the increasingly
complicated
and important
[jobs these people must perform.
This project
is an accordance
with the
IAir Force Dormitory
Master Plan.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
As verified
by the Air Force Dormitory
Master Plan,
lthe base has insufficient
facilities
to adequately
accomodate
permanent
(party
unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel
required
to live
on-base per Air
JForce policy.
The current
dormitory
area is adjacent
to the dining
Ifacility,
base recreation
facilities,
and was the site
of World War II
[barracks
which have been demolished.
This dormitory
and the follow-on
Idormitories
require
upgrades
to the infrastructure
for area development.
IThis will
require
an increase
in electrical
load,
water,
and relocation
of
la sewage lift
station,
and the construction
of a storm water retention
/pond.
The current
site
is crossed by two roads,
one of which will
be
PROJECT:
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 208
I
I
I
I
.
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
(AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
JIANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
J DORMITORY (96 RM)
PROJECT
DATA
I
VIRGINIA
15. PROJECT NUMBER
I
MUHJ013001
1
I
(demolished,
and the second rerouted
around
the dormitory
area.
These
[upgrades
will
provide
a modern dormitory
area.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Adequate
living
quarters
will
continue
to be
resulting
in degradation
of morale,
productivity,
and career
(unavailable,
[satisfaction
for unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel.
Lowered morale
will
Icontribute
to retention
difficulties
for the Air Force.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in the new
Iuniform
barracks
construction
standard
known as "one-plus-one,"
Iestablished
by OSD. All known alternative
options
were considered
during
(the development
of this
project.
No other
option
could meet the mission
Irequirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was needed or performed.
A
(Certificate
of Exception
has been prepared.
FY 1998 Unaccompanied
Housing
IRPM Conducted:
$406~.
FY 1999 Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM Conducted:
]$1,02lK.
Future
Unaccompanied
Housing
RPM requirements
(estimated)
:
(FY00:$424K;
FYOl: $433K; FY02:
Base Civil
Engineer:
$443K; FY03: $453K.
ILt Co1 Ed Keith
(7571-764-2025
Dormitory:
3,168 SM = 34,100
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
(
)
I
I
)
I
(
I
209
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
12. DATE
I
DATA
I
/LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IDORMITORY
VIRGINIA
15.
/
(2)
)
I
MUHJO13001
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(1)
NUMBER
I
(96 RM)
112.
a
PROJECT
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
Percent
Complete
as of Jan 2000
* (cl
Date 35% Designed.
*cd)
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
(b)
Where Design
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
I
00 JAN 15 1
y I
1%
00 MAR 15
00 SEP 01
be performed
Y
costs
Used
YES
LANGLEY
-
1
I
($000) I
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a)
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
(cc)
Total
Contract
(d)
In-house
(e)
(3a)
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
448 1
224 1
672
560
112
01 JAN
01 MAR
(5)
02 SEP
(3)
Construction
Completion
*
Equipment
associated
lblother
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
with
N/A
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page
No
210
Il.
COMPONENT1
12. DATE
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
IAIR FORCE
(computer
qenerated)
15. AREA CONSTI
I** COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
IAIR
MOBILITY
I COST INDEX1
I
1.08
1
COMMAND
IMCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE, WASHINGTON
1
SUPPORTED
PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
I
16.
STRENGTH
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL [CIVl
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
I
311521
4,686
As
of
30
SEP
99
1
4461
31221
960
(
IaI
I
I 31
lb. End FY 2005
31
311521
4,654
1 4411 30941
9611
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
4,639)
la- Total Acreage:
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
2,445,314
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
IcId. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
10,250
0
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
le. Authorization
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
26,605
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
67,400
I
Ih. Grand Total:
2,549,569
1
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
PROJECT TITLE
START
SCOPE
I- CODE
~($000)
___
-CMPL
1141-753
C-17 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
UNIT
C-17 ADD/ALTER
NOSE DOCKS
I
1211-173
3,300
SM
6,500
JAN
99
SEP 001
I
3,750
JAN 99 SEP 001
TOTAL:
10,250
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
NONE
1:::
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1610-000
MISSION
SUPPORT CENTER, PH 1
10,698
SM 15,305
1740-674
FITNESS CENTER
3,154
SM 11,300
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
An airlift
wing with
three
C-141
Isqudrons;
an Air Force
Reserve
C-141 associate
airlift
wing;
and the
/Western
Air Defense
Sector
assiqned
to the Air National
Guard.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
LS
0
0
0
0
;:
and
health:
Backlog
This
Installation
15,131
/
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
page
No 211
11.
I
IAIR
13.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
qenerated)
14.
I
AND LOCATION
I
PROJECT
I
I
ISM
ILS
ILS
I
ILS
IILS
ILS
\SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
AND
I
NOSE DOCKS
PROJECT
COST($OOO))
I
3,750
1 UNIT 1
IU/M~QUANTITY~
IC-17
ADD/ALTER
NOSE
ADD TO NOSE DOCK
ALTER
NOSE DOCK (AFFF)
ALTER
CORROSION
CONTROL
(SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
1 SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
PAVEMENTS
COMM SUPPORT
i
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
ITOTAL
REQUEST
ITOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
TITLE
IC-17
ADD/ALTER
IMCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE,
WASHINGTON
CATEGORY
CODE)7.
PROJECT
NUMBER
18.
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT)6.
I
I
I
I
211-173
i
PQWY993051
4.11.30
I
9. COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
DOCKS
OVERHEAD
(5.7%)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COST
I
700
1
I
I
1,8801
COST
($000)
3,066
(1,316)
I
(
1
489
I ( 2oo)
1 ( 363)
I ( 70)
I
I
I
/
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE
I
DATA
I
(1,550)
I
20)
36)
3,555
3,555
~ 203
3,758
3,750
I
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Add/alter
nose dock 1164:
IReinforced
concrete
foundation
and floor
slab.
Steel
frame with metal
Ipanel
siding
and roof.
Extend fire
suppression/detection,
electrical,
and
[mechanical
systems and necessary
support.
Alter
corrosion
control
hangar
11178: Includes
altering
a corrugated
steel
door by installing
a "soft
[closure"
opening and alter
fire
suppression
system.
/Air Conditioning:
7 KW.
110.
:
I
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
[PROJECT:
C-17
add/alter
nose docks.
(New Mission)
JREQUIREMENT:
Adequately
sized and configured
maintenance
facilities
are
/required
to support
the beddown of 48 C-17 aircraft
at McChord AFB.
(Covered space is required
for aircraft
jacking,'
inspection,
repair
and
[maintenance
of C-17 aircraft.
[CURRENT
SITUATION:
C-17 aircraft
and support
equipment
required
to work
Ion the aircraft
cannot physically
fit
into
the existing
C-141 nose dock
land a C-141 corrosion
control
hangar.
The existing
nose dock is too
Ishallow
to accommodate the larger
C-17 aircraft.
A 700 square meter
Iaddition
is required
to allow the doors to be closed behind the aircraft
Iwings.
The overhead
structural
trusses
of the existing
C-141 corrosion
Icontrol
hangar are not high enough to accommodate the "T-Tail"
of the C-17‘
(and it is not cost effective
to raise them.
The doors of the facility
Imust be modified
to provide
a lUsoft closure"
around the C-17 fuselage.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Adequate
aircraft
maintenance
operations
cannot
[be performed
on the C-17 aircraft.
It will
not be possible
to meet the
laircraft
utilization
rates
of the 48 assigned
C-17 aircraft
unless this
/project
is accomplished.
/
DD FORM 1391,
212
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
I
11.
COMPONENT1
I
12.
I
)AIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
I
IMCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IC-17
I
112.
I =
WASHINGTON
15.
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
I
UNIT
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
PQWYO13051
Design, Bid, Build
I
(1)
(2)
(3)
@a)
(4)
(5)
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
* (cl Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
Date Design
Complete
(e)
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
Where Design
(b)
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 26
15%
00 JAN 30
00 SEP 15
Y
be performed
Used
YES
MCCHORD
-
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
Contract
In-house
(e)
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
Completion
Equipment
associated
lblother
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
with
N/A
this
Previous
project
02 MAY
editions
will
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
are
I
1
310 1
138 1
448 1
345 1
103
01 MAR
01 APR
'
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
I
1
1
(
I
($000) 1
Total
(a)
(b)
(cl
(d)
Construction
1
y I
costs
obsolete.
from
Page
No 213
Il.
COMPONENT!
I
I
[AIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
12.
I
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
IMCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE,
WASHINGTON
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IC-17
ADD/ALTER
NOSE DOCKS
15.
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
PQwY993051
I
This project
does meet the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
IForce Handbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
/reasonable
options
for accomplishing
this project
was done.
It indicates
(that
adding to existing
facilities
will
meet operational
requirements.
IBecause of this a full
economic analysis
was not performed.
A certificate
[of exception
has been prepared.
BASE CIVIL
ENGINEER:
Lt Co1 Bryan
IBodner,
(253) 984-2294.
Add/Alter
Nose Dock: 700 SM = 7,525 SF
\ADDITI~NAL:
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
page No
214
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer generated)
~
AND LOCATION
12.
I
DATE
I
I
I
I
I
IMCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE, WASHINGTON
14. PROJECT TITLE
15. PROJECT NUMBER 1
I
I
IC-17
ADD/ALTER
NOSE DOCKS
I
PQWY993051
I
I
112.
I a
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design Data:
(1)
(2)
I
Design,Bid, Build
Status:
Date Design Started
(a)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Percent
Complete as of Jan 2000
* (cl
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
Date Design Complete
(e)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(f)
Basis:
Standard
or Definitive
Design
(a)
(b)
Where Design Was Most Recently
99 JAN 26
costs
y
35%
00 JAN 30
00 SEP 15
be performed
y
Used -
I
/
NO
N/A
-
1
I
1
1
)
I
I
($000) I
249
(
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other Design Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
(el
In-house
(3a) Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
(3)
(5)
Construction
124
373
310
63
01 MAR
01 APR
Completion
02 MAY
/
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
II3.
other
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
this
project
will
be provided
from
/(
1
1
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
215
Il.
I
(AIR
13.
12.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
DATE
I
PROGRAM
/
qenerated)
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
IAIR MOBILITY
I COST INDEX1
I
1.08
( COMMAND
IMCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE,
WASHINGTON
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
, OFF] ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF) ENL jCIV/
OFF1 ENL ICIV)
TOTAL
4,6861
I
31
311521
960,
I
I
a. As of 30 SEP 99
, 4461
31221
4,654
31
311521
961,
b. End FY 2005
[ 4411
3094,
7. INVENTORY
DATA
($000)
Total
Acreage:
(
4,639)
Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
Authorization
Requested In This Program:
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
Planned In Next Three Program Years:
Remaining Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
ICATEGORY
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
I- CODE
(141-753
C-17 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
I
AIRCRAFT
1211-173
19a.
)9b.
MAINTENANCE
3,300
Projects:
Projects:
1610-000
MISSION
1740-674
FITNESS
110.
Mission
or
Included
Typical
SUPPORT
CENTER
CENTER,
0
10,250
0
(FY 2002)
26,605
67,400
2,549,569
COST
($000)
___
I
DESIGN
START
___
STATUS
-CMPL
in the
Planned
I
6,500
JAN 99
SEP 00)
LS
3,750
JAN 99
SEP 00)
TOTAL:
10,250
Following
Program (FY 2002)
Next Three Years:
PH 1
10,698
3,154
I
SM
NONE
15,305
SM 11,300
Major Functions:
An airlift
wing with three
C-141
Isqudrons;
an Air Force Reserve C-141 associate
airlift
wing; and the
/Western Air Defense Sector
assigned to the Air National
Guard.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
I
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
safety
and health:
c- Occupational
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
0
0
0
0
b.
a-
DD FORM
1390,
1 DEC
76
Previous
editions
)
(
SM
UNIT
C-17 ADD/ALTER NOSE DOCKS
Future
Future
2,445,314
Installation
are obsolete.
15,131
Page No
216
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR
FORCE
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
IC-17
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
I
IAIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
UNIT
JMCCHOPZJ AIR FORCE BASE, WASHINGTON
PROGRAM
ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
PROJECT
NUMBER
IS.
PROJECT
COST($OOO)
15.
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
4.11.30
I
I
141-753
9.
I
I
I
PQWYO13051
COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
C-17 SQUADRON OPERATIONS/AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
UNIT
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ELEVATOR
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
6,500
I
I
U/MlQUANTITYI
I
i
SM I
1 UNIT 1
COST
I
3,300
1
t1,465
4,835
1,359
( 530)
( 404)
( 300)
( 125)
6,194
6,194
353
6,547
LS I
LS I
LS I
EA I
I
I
(5.7%)
I
1 j125,OOO
I
I
I
I
I
facility
with
frame,
sloping
roof
site
improvements
and
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
13,666
SM ADEQUATE:
1,429
SM
10,366
SM SUBSTANDARD:
Construct
a squadron
operations/aircraft
maintenance
unit
IPROJECT:
[facility.
(New Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
This project
is required
to consolidate
Air Mobility
Command
/operational
squadrons
by collocating
aircraft
operators
with
aircraft
This
is the last
of four
Sq Ops/AMU
facilities
required
to
/maintainers.
[house
the C-17/C-141
squadrons.
Squadrons
will
operate
a combination
of
(48 C-17/C-141s
until
all 48 C-17s
arrive
by FY04.
The consolidation
Irelocates
flyers
and maintainers
out of undersized,
interim,
and dispersed
(facilities
into
a functional
and adequately
sized
structure.
Space is
[required
for Sq Ops/AMU management
support,
briefing/debriefing,
flight
training
and testing,
tool
rooms,
(planning,
standardization/evaluation,
Ilocker
rooms,
flying/ground
safety,
bench stock,
mobility
office,
(scheduling,
and a technical
order
library.
These efficiencies
are
Iessential
to maintain
AMC mission
tasking
rates.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
There
are no adequate
facilities
to support
the fourth
(consolidated
Sq Ops/AMU
operations
at McChord
AFB.
Currently,
there
are
/three
operations
and three
maintenance
facilities
in use.
These
Ifacilities
are too small
to house
a fourth
Sq Ops/AMu.
The operations
Ipersonnel
are
working
in an overcrowded,
improperly
configured
facilities
lfar
from the squadron
maintenance
(AMU) personnel
on the fliqhtline.
The
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
COST
($000)
I
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Two-story
Iconcrete
foundation,
masonry
walls,
structural
steel
) system,
fire
protection
system,
utilities,
elevator,
Iparking,
and necessary
support.
IAir
Conditioning:
65 KW.
DD FORM 1391,
I
1
Page
No
1
I
1
I
I
I
/
I
I
217
Il.
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
I
)AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE,
4. PROJECT TITLE
C-17
SQUADRON OPERATIONS/
PROJECT
.
DATA
I
WASHINGTON
(5.
AIRCRAFT
MAINTENANCE
UNIT
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
1
I
PQWYO13051
I
supporting
AMU occupies
an overcrowded,
improperly
configured,
and
temporary
modular
facility
approved
for use only until
the completion
of
this
project.
The associated
squadron
life
support
function
is shoehorned
in with
two other
squadron
life
support
elements
in a single
overcrowded
facility
at a third
location
on base.
This physical
separation
creates
fragmented
lines
of communications
and authority.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Operations,
maintenance,
and support
personnel
will
remain
in separate,
undersized,
and interim
buildings.
Essential
squadron
operations
and logistic
functions
will
continue
to require
Iextensive
work-arounds
that
will
degrade
mission
performance.
Temporary
jmodular
facilities
marginally
support
the flightline
maintenance
unit
and
Iexperience
extensive
wear and tear
and associated
maintenance
costs.
/ADDITIONAL:
This project
does meet the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
IForce
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
(reasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
was done.
It indicates
lnew construction
is the only
option
that
will
meet operational
Jrequirements.
Because
of this,
a full
economic
analysis
was not
(performed.
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
BASE CIVIL
IENGINEER:
Lt co1 Bryan
Bodner,
(253)
984-2294.
Squadron
Operations/AMU
IFacility:
3,300
SM = 35,521
SF
I
I
I
)
I
I
(
L
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
218
12. DATE
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
qenerated)
15. AREA CONST
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
COST INDEX
/AIR FORCE
I
I
1.01
IF E WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
SPACE COMMAND
1
SUPPORTED
PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
16.
OFF] ENL [CIVl OFF1 ENL [CIV] TOTAL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
I STRENGTH
As
of
30
SEP
99
1
5231
28871
4611
11 721 3,945
Ia.
I
I
I 11
lb. End FY 2005
1 5241 27861
4821
11
11 721 3,866
7.
INVENTORY
DATA
($000)
I
(
5,866)
:
Ia. Total Acreage:
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
201,788
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
Ic- Authorization
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
25,720
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
8,400
le. Authorization
If. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
10,213
33,659
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
279,780
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
I- CODE
~
__
-CMPL
(1. COMPONENT(
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
(computer
i
1141-454
I
1212-216
COMMAND AND CONTROL SUPPORT
FACILITY
MM111 MISSILE SERVICE COMPLEX
5,110
SM
10,200
TURN KEY
9,000 SM 15,520
JAN 99 SEP 00
TOTAL:
25,720
(9a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program (FY 2002)
1740-674
FITNESS CENTER
5,051 SM
8,400
TOTAL:
8,400
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned Next Three Years:
1871-183
UPGRADE STORM SEWER SYSTEM
LS 10,213
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
Headquarters
Twentieth
Air Force;
an
I
IAFSPC missile
wing consisting
of one Peacekeeper
and three Minuteman
III
intercontinental
ballistic
missile
squadrons with UH-1 aircraft.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
Air pollution:
0
1
Et: Water pollution:
4,000
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
0
d.
Other Environmental:
2,702
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog This Installation
49,348
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No zlg
Il.
I
IAIR
12.
COMPONENT1
I
13.
FORCE
INSTALLATION
IF.E.
WARREN
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND
LOCATION
I
15. PROGRAM
I
1 3.59.06
AIR FORCE
ELEMENT16.
BASE,
WYOMING
CATEGORY
CODEI7.
PROJECT
141-454
9.
COST
I
(4. PROJECT
TITLE
ICOMMAND AND CONTROL SUPPORT
IFACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
COST($OOO)
I
GHLN983004
ESTIMATE
SM 1
I
LS I
LS I
LS I
LS I
LS I
(5.7%)
COST
I
1
1
2,290
:
1,310
1,353
COST
($000)
6,792
( 3,694)
( 3,098)
2,889
(
I
470
I
!
!
360
(
(
(
250))
300)
500)
169)
9,681
9,681
1
I
552
10,233
1
1
/
I
10,200
I
I
I
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Reinforced
concrete
footings,
lgrade beams, floor
slabs,
steel
frame, masonry/prefinished
metal walls,
sensitive
compartmented
information
facility
lprefinished
steel
roof,
intrusion
detection
systems,
paved approach and
1 (SCIF) area,
fencing,
Iparking
for approximately
60 military
vehicles,
and all necessary
support.
IAir Conditioning:
450 KW.
110.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
Construct
[PROJECT:
5,110
SM
ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
0
a command and control
support
facility.
(New Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
This facility
is required
to support
the permanent
beddown
(of the 4th Command and Control
Squadron
(CACS) and continued
readiness
of
/the Mobile
Consolidated
Command System (MCCS) at FE Warren AFB.
The 4th
ICACS and MCCS provide
sustainment,
mobility,
and operations
and
Imaintenance
in support
of the Joint
Chief of Staff
directed
US Space
/Command Mobile Command and Control
Center.
This mission was relocated
Ifrom its temporary
location
at Peterson
AFB to FE Warren AFB due to
[strategic
safegard
requirements.
Maintenance,
operations,
and training
(areas are needed to provide
in-garrison
support
for this
survivable
mobile
Icommand center.
A secure facility
is also needed to conduct
testing,
Jtraining,
and exercises.
The Wyoming Air National
Guard will
provide
unit
(personnel
as part of the total
Air Force concept.
ICURRENT
SITUATION:
No adequate facilities
exist
at FE Warren AFB or the
[Cheyenne,
Wyoming Air National
Guard to permanently
support
this mission.
[In order to disperse
strategic
command and control
assets,
the MCCS was
(relocated
to FE Warren AFB during
the summer of 1999 in an existing
[temporary
facility
that provides
only 2,230 square meters which is 40% of
lthe required
scope.
This facility
is located
approximately
300 feet
from
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
1
I
1
1
(
(
( 1,020)
1
(
650) 1
(
I
SM I
T
1 UNIT
U/MIQUANTITYj
3-l I 5,110
SM I
2,820
1
I
10,200
I
ITEM
ICOMMAND AND CONTROL
SUPPORT
FACILITY
1 OPERATIONS
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
AREA
1 MOBILE
EQUIPMENT
OPERATIONS
AREA
JSUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
) BACKUP POWER GENERATION
1 SECURITY
FENCE/LIGHTS
COMPARTMENTED
AREA
I SENSITIVE
ISUBTOTAL
JTOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
ITOTAL
REQUEST
[TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
DATE
qenerated)
I
I
DATA
are obsolete.
Page No 220
I
:
1
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(AIR FORCE
(computer
generated)
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
I
[F.E.
WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
COMMAND AND CONTROL SUPPORT
PROJECT
DATA
(5.
I
FACILITY
12.
I
DATE
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
GHLN983004
the base boundary
and lacks
security
fencing,
cameras,
clear
zones,
alarms,
and proper
entry
control.
Operational
security
of this
classified
mission
is degraded
due to close
proximity
to the base boundary
and
off-base
residences.
In addition,
proper
physical
security
for the
priority
asset
is a concern.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The 4th CACS will
not have adequate
facilities
conduct
their
mission.
Workarounds
and waivers
will
continue
to degrade
the security
and maintenance
of this
mission.
Testing,
training,
and
exercises
will
continue
to be negatively
impacted.
ADDITIONAL:
There
is no criteria/scope
for this
project
in Air
Force
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements"
or in Part
II of Military
Handbook
1190,
"Facility
Planning
and Design
Guide."
Space requirements
are based on a study
done by an Architectural
Engineering
firm.
Base
Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 Carlos
Cruz-Gonzalez,
(307)
775-3600.
Operations
and Administrative
Area:
2,820SM
= 30,343SF;
Mobile
Equipment
Operations
Area:
2,290SM
= 24,640.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
(
Page No
to
221
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
IAIR
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
13.
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
I
DATA
I
IF.E.
14.
I
WARREN AIR FORCE BASE,
PROJECT TITLE
WYOMING
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
I
[COMMAND AND CONTROL
I
112.
a
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
(1)
(2)
DATA:
Design
Project
to
Data:
be accomplished
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
(b)
Where Design
Definitive
Was Most
(4)
Design
Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
(3)
(3a)
DEC 76
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
-
NO
Used
N/A
-
510 1
OONOV I
01 FEB 1
I
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
lb[other
appropriations:
I
DD FORM 1391C,
GHLN983004
SUPPORT FACILITY
1
with
N/A
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
be performed
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page
No
222
(1. COMPONENT1
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
(2.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
PROGRAM
DATE
I
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONST]
COST INDEX/
IAIR FORCE
I
I
1.01
SPACE COMMAND
IF E WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
I
OFF] ENL ICIV]
OFF] ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
I STRENGTH
I
I
I
11
11
721
3,945l
Ia* As of 30 SEP 99
1 5231 28871
4611
721
3,8661
1
5241
27861
4821
11
11
lb. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
5,866)
la- Total Acreage:
201,788
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
IcId. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
25,720
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
8,400
le- Authorization
If. Planned
In Next Three Program
Years:
10,213
Deficiency:
33,659
lg. Remaining
Ih. Grand Total:
279,780
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
COST
DESIGN STATUS )
ICATEGORY
CODE
PROJECT
TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~START
-CMPL 1
I1141-454
I
1212-216
AND LOCATION
COMMAND AND CONTROL SUPPORT
FACILITY
MM111 MISSILE
SERVICE COMPLEX
5,110
SM
10,200
TURN KEY
I
9,000 SM 15,520
JAN 99 SEP 001
TOTAL:
25,720
(9a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1740-674
FITNESS CENTER
5,051 SM
8,400
TOTAL:
8,400
)9b.
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
Future
Projects:
1871-183
UPGRADE STORM SEWER SYSTEM
LS 10,213
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
Twentieth
Air Force;
an
IAFSPC missile
wing consisting
of one Peacekeeper
and three Minuteman
III
intercontinental
ballistic
missile
squadrons
with UH-1 aircraft.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
I
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
b.
a-
0
4,000
and health:
Backlog
0
This
Installation
2,702
49,348
/
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
223
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
(AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2005
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
qenerated)
14. PROJECT TITLE
AND LOCATION
I
I
IF. E. WARREN AIR FORCE BASE, WYOMING
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT(6.
CATEGORY CODE17.
]
12. DATE
I
212-216
3.59.96
IMMIII
MISSILE
SERVICE COMPLEX
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)I
GHLN973001
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
MM111
MISSILE
SERVICE
COMPLEX
:
MISSILE
SERVICE SHOPS
ADMINISTRATIVE
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
1 PAVEMENTS
1 DEMOLITION
ISUBTOTAL
(TOTAL CONTRACT COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
ITOTAL REQUEST
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
i
15,520
I
I
U/M/QUANTITY
SM 1 9,000
SM 1 6,936
SM I 2,064
I
LS I
LS I
Is I
SM I
I
UNIT
COST
1,350
1,352
I
1
170
88
I-
COST
($000)
12,155
( 9,364)
( 2,791)
2,540
650)
(
310)
(
( 1,565)
15)
(14,695
14,695
838
15,533
15,520
Reinforced
concrete
foundation
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
concrete
masonry
walls,
sloped
steel
roof
deck.
Includes
land floor
slab,
(electronics
laboratory,
vehicle
and equipment
staging,
van configuration
/support,
training
and office
areas,
asphalt
pavement,
vehicle
electrical
Demolish
one facility
(170 SM) .
/hookups,
and all necessary
support.
IAir Conditioning:
610 KW.
9,884 SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
8,566 SM
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
IPROJECT:
Construct
a minuteman
three
(MM III)
missile
service
complex.
I (Current
Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
This facility
will
provide
a modern,
efficient
space to
[perform
missile
component
repair,
technical
training,
and administrative
I functions.
START Treaties
I and II require
the number of ICBM multiple
Ire-entry
vehicles
(MRVS) be reduced
and the missiles
deactivated.
As a
Iresult,
missile
service
operations
will
inc.rease
significantly
over the
Inext
several
years because
of the requirement
to convert
warheads
to
Isingle
re-entry
vehicles.
The reduction
in the ICBM arsenal
will
require
Imissiles
remaining
on alert
be provided
additional
maintenance
to maintain
Ian effective
strategic
deterrent.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
Currently,
the MM111 missile
service
functions
are
Iperformed
in five
separate
buildings.
Three of these buildings
were
Iconstructed
in 1909 and are on the National
Historic
Register.
Altering
(these buildings
to consolidate
and improve
efficiency
is not physically
Ipossible.
The HVAC systems
are worn out and inadequate.
Lighting
in the
Ibuildings,
especially
in the service
areas is poor and electrical
loverloads
cause frequent
circuit
failure.
Antiquated
and worn out
lplumbinq
often
clogs and needs to be replaced.
Floor
drains
in the
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No 224
I
)
(
)
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
IAIR
FY 2005
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
PROJECT
DATA
12.
I
DATE
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
(F.
I*-
E. WARREN AIR
PROJECT
TITLE
I
/MM111
FORCE
BASE,
WYOMING
15.
PROJECT
N-UMBER
I
MISSILE
SERVICE
COMPLEX
GHLN973001
ment service
bays are not equipped with pollution
prevention
devices
[which is a violation
of local
board of public
utilities
pretreatment
Iregulations.
Vehicle
and equipment
engine exhaust
removal systems are
Iinadequate
and under powered.
During maintenance
operations,
thick
diesel
Iexhaust
is visible
in service
bays if bay doors are closed.
The lack of
Ifire
suppression
systems,
alarm pull
stations,
fire
barriers,
and the use
[of non-fire
rated materials
has resulted
in Fire Safety
Deficiency
Iviolations
in each of the existing
structures.
The layout
of the existing
Ishops is inefficient
for the maintenance
teams.
On a daily
basis,
all
Ipersonnel
must make stops at three different
buildings
to pick up
Isupplies,
equipment,
technical
orders and other data prior
to traveling
to
lthe missile
sites.
Large electrical
cables used to supply power to
Iequipment
in the electronics
laboratory
are exposed and present
a safety
Ihazard.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Personnel
will
be forced
to continue
working
in
Iinadequate
facilities
with safety
and fire
code deficiencies.
Additional
[manhours are necessary
to satisfy
mission requirements
due to poor
Ifunctional
layout
of the individual
buildings,
as well as having
similar
Ifunctions
physically
separated.
Vital
and costly
mission
essential
Iequipment
may be damaged due to additional
handling
and/or
servicing
in
Iinadequate
service
shop areas.
(ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
(Handbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
An economic analysis
has been
Iprepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
revitalization,
land status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of
lthe respective
alternatives,
new construction
was found to be the most
(cost efficient
over the life
of the project.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt co1
ICarlos
Cruz-Gonzalez,
(307) 775-3600.
Missile
Service
Shops: 6,936SM =
174,631~~.
Administrative:
2,064SM = 22,208SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
1
I
Page No 225
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
(AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
(F.
E. WARREN AIR
PROJECT TITLE
14.
112.
a*
(1)
(3)
(3a)
(4)
I
SERVICE
(5)
1
I
I
15. PROJECT
COMPLEX
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
* (c) Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
(e)
Date Design
Complete
(f)
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
(b)
Where Design
NUMBER
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 22
15%
99 DEC 20
00 SEP 20
Y
be performed
Used
-
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
($000)
930
465
1395
1165
230
00 NOV
01 FEB
Completion
with
N/A
this
Previous
1
y I
costs
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
Contract
(e) In-house
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
I
GHLN973001
Total
(a)
(b)
(cl
(d)
Construction
1
Design, Bid, Build
03 JAN
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
lother
12. DATE
WYOMING
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(2)
lb-
DATA
I
MM111 MISSILE
1
FORCE BASE,
PROJECT
project
editions
will
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page
No
226
Il.
COMPONENT]
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
I
[CLASSIFIED
LOCATION
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
a. As of 30 SEP 99
b. End FY 2005
PERMANENT
I
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
1
I
I
DATE
I
15.
AREA CONSTI
COST INDEX)
0.00
I
1 SUPPORTED
STUDENTS
OFF1 ENL lCIV[
OFF1 ENL lCIV[
II
Ill
TOTAL
II
7.
INVENTORY DATA ($000)
0)
1;: Tz:t:::';za,
is Of:
(30 SEP 99)
Not Yet In Inventory:
IC. Authorization
(d. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
le. Authorization
(f.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
(h. Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
I- CODE
I lOO-000
I
SPECIAL TACTICAL
UNIT
DETACHMENT FACILITY
LS
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the
~100-000
SPECIAL TACTICAL
UNIT
DETACHMENT FACILITY
I
1131-132
SBIRS REMOTE GROUND STATION
19b.
111.
I
j
112.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Outstanding
pollution
and
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Planned
safety
1,810
0
0
1,810
5,958
5,000
0
12,768
DESIGN STATUS (
START
CMPL 1
___
I
APR 99 AUG 001
TOTAL:
1,810
Following
Program
(FY 2002)
LS
4,458
465 SM
1,500
TOTAL:
5,958
Next Three
Years:
(OSHA) deficiencies:
0
0
0
0
0
z:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
/
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
paw
No
227
11. COMPONENT/
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
ICLASSIFIED
(5. PROGRAM
12.
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND
CATEGORY
TITLE
14. PROJECT
(SPECIAL
TACTICAL
UNIT
IDETACHMENT
FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
(8. PROJECT
CODE(7.
I
I
2.72.48
100-000
9.
COST
DATE
I
DATA
qenerated)
LOCATION
ELEMENT(6.
PROJECT
COST($OOO)(
I
1,810
PAYZO10004
ESTIMATES
I
ITEM
UNIT DETACHMENT
I
1 UNIT
IU/M~QUANTITY[
ISPECIAL
TACTICAL
IFACILITY
[SUBTOTAL
JTOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
ITOTAL
REQUEST
(TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
I
I
I
ILS I
/
COST
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
COST
($0001
I
1
I
I
1,810
1,810
1,810
j
I
I
I
I
I
I /
(10.
Ill.
Description
of
Proposed Construction:
required.
Special
Access Required.
REQUIREMENT:
(REQUIREMENT:
I
DD FORM
1391,
DEC
As
76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No
228
12.
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
]CLASSIFIED
14. PROJECT
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
112.
AND LOCATION
15.
TITLE
I
UNIT
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
(1)
(2)
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
TACTICAL
a.
I
DATA
generated)
I
ISPECIAL
DATE
DETACHMENT
PAYZO10004
FACILITY
DATA:
Design
Design, Bid, Build
Data:
Status:
(a)
Date Design Started
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Percent
Complete as of Jan 2000
* (c)
Date 35% Designed.
*cd)
(e)
Date Design Complete
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(f)
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
Design
(b)
Where Design Was Most Recently
99 APR
Y
15%
99 DEC 30
00 AUG 15
be performed
NO
N/A
Used -
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other Design Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
(e)
In-house
@a) Construction Contract Award Date
(4)
Construction
Start
($000)
(3)
(5)
Construction
02
costs
107
56
163
145
18
00 DEC
Completion
01
JAN
02
DEC
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
lb-
[other
Equipment associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are obsolete.
from
Page No
229