Department of the Air Force
Military Construction and Family
Housing Program
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2000
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
President’s Budget
Page Number
General
Table of Contents ................................................................
1
Program Summary ..............................................................
3
Militarv Construction
State Summary (List of Projects) .......................................
5
New Mission/Current Mission Exhibit ..............................
13
Installation Index ................................................................
21
Special Program Considerations:
Statements .........................................................................
23
Congressional Reporting Requirements ........................
24
Research and Development .............................................
26
Third Party Financing .....................................................
27
Appropriation Language ....................................................
29
Inside the United States Construction Projects.. ..............
31
Outside the United States Construction Projects.. ...........
231
Unspecified Minor Construction .......................................
259
Planning and Design ...........................................................
261
Working Capital Funds Construction Projects.. ..............
263
1
Inside the United States Construction Projects
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
I
[VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IUPGRADE
WATER DISTRIBUTION
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
12.
I
DATE
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
XUMU003005R
SYSTEM
1
I
Stagnation
in the water
system
will
continue
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Ileading
to disinfectant
residual
degradation
in violation
of Health
and
ISafety
Code.
Outbreaks
of bacteria
will
lead to public
"do not drink"
Inotifications
and future
NOVs due to violations
of CCR Title
22.
These
loutbreaks
could
result
in penalties
or fines
from an NOV and adverse
limpacts
to the health
of the base populace.
This
project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IADDITIONAL:
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
All known
alternative
options
Jwere considered
during
the development
of this
project.
No other
option
Icould
meet environmental
and mission
requirements;
therefore,
no economic
Ianalysis
was needed
or performed.
A certificate
of exception
has been
[prepared.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Co1 Steven
Boyce,
(805)
606-8232.
IUpgrade
Water
Distribution
System:
41,SOOLM = 136,120LF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete,
Page
No
75
Il.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
I
IAIR
13.
I
IVANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IUPGRADE WATER DISTRIBUTION
I
112.
a.
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
(1)
(2)
[other
PROJECT
DATA
1
CALIFORNIA
15.
PROJECT
I
NUMBER
DATA:
Design
Project
to
Data:
be accomplished
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or
(b)
Where Design
Definitive
Was Most
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
-
NO
Used
-
N/A
232
00 DEC
01 FEB
(5)
Construction
02 JUL
(6)
Energy
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
with
N/A
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
N
be performed
be provided
from
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
1
I
XUMU003005R
SYSTEM
Design
Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(3)
(3a)
(4)
lb-
12. DATE
I
COMPONENT!
76
Il.
COMPONENT1
12. DATE
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR FORCE
15.
AREA CONSTI
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
(BUCKLEY AIR NATIONAL GUARD BASE,
I COST INDEX1
I
1.04
IAIR
NATIONAL
GUARD
[COLORADO
1
SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
I
I
16. PERSONNEL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF! ENL ICIV(
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
I
I
I
I
I
I 1,555
a.
As of 30 SEP 99
I 1411 798 1 6161
1 1,404
b. End FY 2005
1 1131 6721 6191
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(30
SEP 99)
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
I',: Authorization
Requested In This Program:
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
le.
If. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
COST
[CATEGORY
ICODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~
I
1812-225
)9a.
1740-674
SBIRS POWER CONNECTION
Future
Projects:
Included
FITNESS CENTER
LS
in
the
2,750
3,015,117
0
I
2,750
8,600
9,500
11,000
3,046,967
DESIGN STATUS
START
___
-CMPL 1
I
APR 99
SEP 001
TOTAL:
2,750
Following
Program (FY 2002)
5,051 SM
8,600
TOTAL :
8,600
Next Three Years:
1,793 SM
6,500
)9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
1131-132
ADD/ALTER SBIRS MISSION
CONTROL STATION
I
1171-475
INDOOR SMALL ARMS RANGE
1,000 SM
3,000
Mission
or Major Functions:
110.
Headquarters
Colorado
Air National
140th Fighter
Wing with F-16C/D aircraft,
the 821st Space Group, a
[Guard;
lspace warning
squadron,
and an Air Intelligence
Agency Operations
Support
an Army Aviation
Support
facility
with UH-60, OH-SE, and US-1
ISquadron;
Ihelicopters;
the Denver Naval Research Center;
and the 743rd Army
IIntelliqence
Battalion.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
Ill.
I
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
bd.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
112.
Installation
27,207
I
DD FORM 1390,
/
0
0
0
0
a.
I
I
I
I
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 77
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
IBUCKLEY
AIR NATIONAL
GUARD BASE,
lCOLORAD0
(5.
PROGRAM ELEMENTj6.
CATEGORY
CODEj7.
I
[AIR
1
6.44.41
PROJECT
DATE
I
generated)
14. PROJECT TITLE
ISPACE BASED INFRARED
SYSTEM
(POWER CONNECTION
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
COST($OOO)
CRWU013002
812-225
9.
COST
ESTIMATE
ITEM
SPACE BASED INFRARED
SYSTEM POWER
CONNECTION
ELECTRIC
SWITCHING
STATION
PRIMARY
UNDERGROUND DISTRIBUTION
FACILITIES
I SUPPORTING
UTILITIES
I
1 SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
1 PAVEMENTS
I TESTING AND CHECKOUT
t
AND OVERHEAD
2,750
-7
1 UNIT
U/M
QUANTITY
I
COST
LS I
LS I
WI
LINE
742 1
752
I
lSUBTOTAL
[TOTAL CONTRACT COST
(5.7%)
1
:s
I
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
ITOTAL
REQUEST
[TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
DATA
/ LS
LS
I LS
ILS
I
I
I
I
I
/
(
I
/
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
COST
($000)
2,038
(1,480)
( 558)
580
( 250)
(
70)
(
90)
( 170)
2,618
2,618
__ 149
2,767
2,750
110.
New underground
diverse
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Irouting
of primary
and backup 4160 volt
power feeds complete
with dual
125OOKVA transformers
and dual redundant
switchgear.
Reprogram existing
[generator
control
system and switchgear
to allow for independent
power
This work includes
all cabling,
connections,
conduit,
system
I feeds.
Itesting,
and other associated
work to provide
complete power feed.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT: As required.
IPROJECT:
Space based infrared
system (SBIRS) power connection.
(New
IMission)
IREQUIREMENT:
This project
directly
supports
the Space Based Infrared
I System (SBIRS),
an Air Force core modernization
program.
It provides
for
Ireliable
primary
and emergency backup power for the Mission
Control
IStation
in support
of the SBIRS program.
The Mission
Control
Station
Iprovides
central
processing
functions
for tactical
and strategic
/space-based
early
warning battlespace
characterization
and technical
Iintelligence
gathering
requirements.
Backup power is required
to limit
(downtime to five
and one half minutes per year (99.999% availability)
for
[mission
critical
utility
loads.
This new power connection
is required
to
Iobtain
the required
power availability.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
SBIRS will
replace
the Defense Support
Program (DSP);
Ihowever,
the existing
DSP power plant
on site
is not capable of supporting
Iboth the new and existing
missions at the same time due to generator
and
Imain switchgear
limitations.
A Memorandum of Agreement
is in place that
Iallows
both the commercial
and backup power requirements
to be supplied
lvia a temporary
connection
to the Aerospace
Data Facility
power plant.
[This connection
must be upgraded because the temporary
connection
is rated
(for 1.5 Megawatts
while the SBIRS Mission
Control
Station
requires
a 2.5
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
t
78
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12.
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
[BUCKLEY AIR NATIONAL
14. PROJECT TITLE
SPACE BASED INFRARED
GUARD BASE,
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
coLoRAD
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
CRWU013002
SYSTEM POWER CONNECTION
IMegawatt
connection
for
full
mission
capability
to be realized.
The SBIRS Mission
Control
Station
will
have no
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Icommercial
or backup
power
beyond
the five
year
limitation
imposed
by the
Even if the Memoradum of Agreement
with
the
[Aerospace
Data Facility.
the temporary
feeder
cannot
provide
IAerospace
Data Facility
is extended,
Isufficient
power
for full
mission
capability
of the SBIRS Mission
Control
/Station:
There
is no criteria/scope
for this
project
in Air Force
IADDITIONAL:
"Facility
Requirements".
All known
alternative
options
IHandbook
32-1084,
Iwere
considered
during
the development
of this
project.
No other
option
no economic
analysis
was
Icould
meet the mission
requirements;
therefore,
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Base
Ineeded
or performed.
Lt Co1 James Mills,
(719)556-7631.
Primary
Underground
ICivil
Engineer:
[Distribution
Line:
742 LM = 2,434 LF.
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
79
Il.
I
COMPONENT1
)AIR
13.
FORCE
INSTALLATION
12.
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATE
I
DATA
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
JBUC~EY
AIR NATIONAL
PROJECT
TITLE
14.
GUARD
BASE,
COLORADO
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
I
SPACE
112.
BASED
INFRARED
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
Estimated
(1)
(2)
(3)
SYSTEM
POWER
CRWU013002
CONNECTION
DATA:
Design
Design, Bid, Build
Data:
/
I
Status:
Date Design Started
(a)
(b)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
Percent
Complete as of Jan 2000
* (c)
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
Date Design Complete
(e)
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
Design
(b)
Where Design Was Most Recently
99 APR 01
Y
15%
99 DEC 15
00 SEP 20
be performed
Y
costs
-
NO
N/A
Used -
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(b)
All Other Design Costs
Total
(c)
(d)
Contract
(e)
In-house
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
($000)
165
82
247
207
(a)
(3a)
(4)
(5)
Construction
00 I&i
01 JAN
01 SEP
Completion
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
lb-
lother
I
Equipment
associated
with
appropriations:
N/A
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are obsolete.
from
Page No
80
Il.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
]AIR
FY 2001
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
PROGRAM
DATE
I
I
qenerated)
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONST
COST INDEX
\AIR
FORCE
I
I
1.03
SPACE COMMAND
IPETERSON
AIR FORCE BASE,
COLORADO
16. PERSONNEL
I
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
OFF]
ENL \CIV\
OFF]
ENL lCIV\
TOTAL
1 OFF]
ENL 1 CIV
STRENGTH
a. As of 30 SEP 99
111411 19521 17451
1
1
1
81
71
11
4,854
I
b. End FY 2005
111201 19321 17771
81
71
11 4,845 1
7. INVENTORY
DATA
($000)
1
(
1,278)
la. Total Acreage:
2,322,743
(30 SEP 99)
lb. Inventory
Total As Of:
AND LOCATION
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
Authorization
Requested In This Program:
(FY 2002)
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
(f. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
[h. Grand Total:
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
PROJECT TITLE
ICoDE
SCOPE
($000)
~
ICId.
I
1141-456
1721-312
I
19a.
1610-284
OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY
DORMITORY
Included
in the
Future
Projects:
ADD TO AND ALTER USSPACECOM
1721-312
I
HEADQUARTERS
DORMITORY
1911-146
MAINTAIN
Future
3,250
144
ACCESS MAIN GATE
1442-758
Projects:
MISSION
I
Typical
SUPPORT
Planned
35,700
32,262
1
2,423,815
DESIGN STATUS
START
CMPL
~
__
950 SM
2,260
TURN KEY
144 RM 11,000
TURN KEY
TOTAL:
13,260
Following
Program (FY 2002)
SM
6,300
RM
7 HC
11,300
2,250
19,850
TOTAL:
19b.
0
13,260
19,850
Next
WAREHOUSE
Three
Years:
5,425
SM
9,800
RM
RM
12,400
12,200
PHASE I
1721-312
1721-312
1740-674
DORMITORY
DORMITORY
ADD TO AND ALTER
144
144
832
FITNESS
SM
1,300
CENTER
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
Headquarters
United
States
Space
ICommand; Headquarters
Air Force Space Command; Headquarters
North American
(Air Defense Command; Space and Warning Systems Center;
a space wing with
IC-21 aircraft;
an Air Intelligence
Agency intelligence
group;
the Air
IForce Materiel
Command Space Systems Support
Group; and an Air Force
(Reserve airlift
winq with one C-130 squadron and an ANG C-21 unit.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
a.
b.
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
DD FORM
1390,
1 DEC
76
Previous
editions
70,000
82,000
0
1,042,OOO
Installation
are
obsolete.
5,747
Page No 81
1
I
11.
12.
COMPONENT1
I
I
(AIR FORCE
-1 3 . INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
14.
AND LOCATION
I
J
PROJECT
9.
COST
RM)
PROJECT
I
1 UNIT
I
(U/M\QUANTITY/
ITEM
DORMITORY
(144
RM)
DORMITORY
SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
RELOCATE
ATHLETIC
COURTS
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
TOTAL
REQUEST
TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
I
I
ISM
COST($OOO)
11,000
TDKA983003
ESTIMATES
I
I
TITLE
I
[DORMITORY
(144
PROJECT
NUMBER
18.
I
721-312
3.59.96
I
DATA
qenerated)
I
IPETERSON
AIR FORCE BASE,
COLORADO
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
I
PROJECT
DATE
5,040
COST
COST
I
1
($000)
8,442
( 8,442)
2,050
750)
(
600)
(
(.
480)
(-.-- 220)
1,675
ILS
I Is
ILS
I=
4 1 55,000
I
I
(5.7%
)I I
I I
I I
1I
1
I
:
:
I
10,492
I
11,000
I
I
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Three story,
concrete
foundation/floor
slabs,
masonry
walls,
standing
seam metal
roof.
Includes
[room-bath-room
modules
with common kitchen
and dining
area,
laundries,
lounge
areas,
mailroom,
supporting
facilities,
and minimum
[storage,
Jantiterorism/
force protection
measures.
Site constraints
require
Irelocation
of 4 tennis/basketball
courts
and rerouting
of utility
lines.
IAir
Conditioning:
450 KW.
10.
1,207 RM ADEQUATE:
REQUIREMENT:
378 RM SUBSTANDARD:
204 RM
[PROJECT:
Construct
a dormitory.
(Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
A major
Air Force objective
provides
unaccompanied
enlisted
Ipersonnel
with housing
conducive
to their
proper
rest,
relaxation
and
Ipersonal
well-being.
Properly
designed
and furnished
quarters
providing
/some degree of individual
privacy
are essential
to the successful
Iaccomplishment
of the increasingly
complicated
and important
jobs these
lpeople
must perform.
The retention
of these highly
trained
airmen
is
Iessential
to our readiness
posture
and continuing
world-wide
presence.
IPeterson
AFB supports
both Cheyenne Mountain
AFS and Schriever
AFB with
Iunaccompanied
enlisted
housing.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The base has insufficient
on-base
housing
to
Iaccommodate
the unaccompanied
enlisted
personnel.
This project
is in
[accordance
with the Air Force Dormitory
Master
Plan.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Adequate
living
quarters
which provide
a level
of
(privacy
required
for today's
airmen
will
not be available,
resulting
in
Idegradation
of morale,
productivity,
and career
satifaction
for
Iunaccompanied
enlisted
personnel.
IADDITIONAL:
This Project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in the new
I
(11.
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No 82
I
I
c
11.
I
12.
COMPONENT1
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
(144
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
generated)
AND LOCATION
IPETERSON
AIR FORCE
14. PROJECT TITLE
DORMITORY
MILITARY
BASE,
COLORADO
15.
I
RM)
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
TDKA983003
[uniform
barracks
construction
standard,
known as "one-plus-one",
Iestablished
by OSD. All known alternatives
were considered
during
the
Idevelopment
of this project.
No other option
could meet mission
Irequirements.
Therefore,
no economic analysis
was needed or performed.
IFY1998 Unaccompanied
Housing Real Property
Maintenance
Conducted:
$322K.
IFY1999 Unaccompanied
Housing Real Property
Maintenance
conducted:
$302K.
IFuture
Unaccompanied
Housing RPM requirements
(estimated):
FYOO: $320;
IFYOl:
$332K; FY02:
$346K; FY03:
$362.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1
IJames Mills
(7191556-7631.
Dormitory:
5,040SM = 54,230 SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page No 83
12. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
IPETERSON AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IDORMITORY
112.
(144
Estimated
(1)
(2)
coLoRAD
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
Design
Data:
to be accomplished
by design-build
Basis:
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
(a)
(3)
@a)
(41
Design Allowance
Construction Contract Award
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
procedures
-
NO
Used -
N/A
550
Date
00 NOV
01 FEB
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
ib.
Equipment
associated
with
[other
appropriations:
N/A
DEC 76
Design
Recently
02 AUG
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
be performed
be provided
are obsolete.
1
I
TDKA983003
DATA:
Project
DD FORM 1391C,
I
DATA
RM)
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
PROJECT
Y
from
Page No
84
(1.
I
[AIR
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
PROGRAM
(2.
I
DATE
I
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
IAIR FORCE
I
I COST INDEX1
1.03
SPACE COMMAND
PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO
I
1
SUPPORTED
STUDENTS
PERMANENT
6. PERSONNEL
OFF] ENL ]CIVl
OFF1 ENL lCIVl
TOTAL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
STRENGTH
111411 19521 17451
1
1
1
81
71
11 4,8541
a. As of 30 SEP 99
71
11 4,845
81
ib. End FY 2005
11120i
1932i
17771
INVENTORY
DATA
($000)
7.
1,278)
(
Ia* Total Acreage:
2,322,743
(30 SEP 99)
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
IC13,260
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
(FY 2002)
19,850
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
35,700
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
32,262
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
2,423,815
Ih. Grand Total:
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS )
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~
~START
-CMPL 1
I2,260
TURN KEY
1141-456
OPERATIONS SUPPORT FACILITY
950 SM
I
144 RM 11,000
TURN KEY
(721-312
DORMITORY
TOTAL :
13,260
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
(610-284
ADD TO AND ALTER USSPACECOM
3,250
SM
6,300
HEADQUARTERS
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM 11,300
1911-146
MAINTAIN
ACCESS MAIN GATE
7 HC
2,250
TOTAL:
19,850
(9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
1442-758
MISSION
SUPPORT WAREHOUSE
5,425
SM
9,800
PHASE I
I
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM 12,400
1721-312
DORMITORY
144 RM 12,200
1740-674
ADD TO AND ALTER FITNESS
832 SM
1,300
I
CENTER
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
United
States
Space
I
[Command;
Headquarters
Air Force
Space Command; Headquarters
North
American
I
IAir
Defense
Command; a space wing with
C-21 aircraft;
the Air Force
I
IMaterial
Command Space Systems
Support
Group;
and an Air
Force
Reserve
I
[airlift
winq with
one C-130
squadron.
.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
13.
AND LOCATION
i
I
/
112.
a.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
b*
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
70,000
82,000
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
0
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
1,042,OOO
5,747
Page No85
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT
13. INSTALLATION
I
I
lOPERATIONS
/PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER
I
I
I
2.80.19
141-456
TDKA003010
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
FACILITY
IOPERATIONS
SUPPORT
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
/ PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
SECURE COMMUNICATIONS
FORCE PROTECTION MEASURES
1 SCIF
/SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
DATE
TITLE
SUPPORT FACILITY
18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
I
2,260
I
I
1 UNIT
IU/MIQUANTITYI
950
ISM I
I
(2.
I
DATA
cost
I
1,514
I
ILS I
ILS I
ILS
ILS
ILS
ISM
I
I
I
1
COST
)
($000)
I
1,438
715
( 240)
( 160)
(
80)
(
100)
40)
95)
(
2,153
2,153
123
2,276
2,260
(
250
(5.7%)
380
1
I
1
)
(
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
J
110.
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Single
story
facility
with
Iconcrete
foundation,
reinforced
concrete
slab on grade floor,
masonry
(walls with brick
veneer,
standing
seam metal roof.
Includes
Sensitive
ICompartmentalized
Information
Facility
(SCIF) area,
secure vault,
entry
[control
point,
fire
protection,
force protection
measures,
communications,
Isitework,
and all other support.
(Air Conditioning:
30 KW.
I
111.
REQUIREMENT: 950 SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD: 515 SM
IPROJECT:
Construct
an operations
support
facility.
(Current
Mission)
/REQUIREMENT:
An adequate,
energy efficient,
properly
configured,
secure
(facility
is required
to house 50 personnel
from the 544th Intelligence
IGroup (IG) . A SCIF and support
space is needed for operation
and
[maintenance
functions,
communication
centers,
security
measures,
and
(support
functions
for Air Intelligence
Agency operations.
Increased
space
(requirements
resulted
from expanded mission responsilities
with 14th Air
/Force and 21st Space Wing, and growth of space units
under the control
of
(the 544 IG.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
The 544th Intelligence
Group occupies
515 SM of the
Ifirst
floor
of Building
845, the 21st Space Wing Headquarters
Facility.
IAt their
current
manning level
of 35 personnel,
the 544 IG uses all
the
Iavailable
space in this building.
There are 27 people working
in support
(space and 8 people working
in a secure vault.
There is no more room for
lthe additional
personnel
which require
both SCIF and support
space for the
(group's
operations.
In addition,
there
is no more SCIF space available
on
IPeterson
AFB.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The 544 IG will
be forced
to disperse
additional
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
I
I
I
I
I
I
86
(1. COMPONENT1
I
I
(AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
I
IPETERSON AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT
DATA
12.
I
DATE
coLowm0
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
I
OPERATIONS
SUPPORT
TDKA003010
FACILITY
(personnel
to other
facilities
on base,
adversely
affecting
command and
[control
and decreasing
unit
productivity.
The 544 IG SCIF operations
will
[be forced
to be conducted
in approximately
l/2 the actual
secure
space
Irequired
for effective
operations.
Inadequate
SCIF and support
space
will
[prevent
the 544 IG from effectively
performing
its
mission.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
A preliminary
analysis
of
Ireasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
(status
quo, building
Iexpansion,
new construction,
finding
alternative
space,
and leasing)
has
Ibeen accomplished.
Results
of this
analysis
indicate
only one option,
new
Iconstruction,
will
meet all
operational
requirements.
Accordingly,
a full
(economic
analysis
was not performed.
A Certificate
of Exception
has been
Iprepared.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt Co1 James Mills
(719)
556-7631.
IOperations
Support
Facility:
950SM = 10,222SF.
I
I
I
I
(
/
1
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
87
Il.
I
IAIR
12.
COMPONENT1
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
IOPERATIONS
I
(12.
SUPPORT
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
(2)
FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
Design
Project
I
TDKA003010
Data:
to be accomplished
by design-build
Basis :
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
(3)
(3a)
(4)
Design Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
Design
Recently
procedures
NO
N/A
Used -
113
00 NOV
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
01
JAN
01
DEC
be performed
y
Equipment associated
with
lother
appropriations:
N/A
lb.
DD FORM
1391C,
1
DATA:
Estimated
(1)
I
generated)
AND LOCATION
13.
I
JPETERS~N
AIR FORCE BASE,
COLORADO
14. PROJECT
TITLE
I
DATE
DEC
76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
be provided
are obsolete.
from
Page No 88
/
12. DATE
Il.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
I
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR FORCE
(4. COMMAND
(5. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
13. INSTALLATION
IAIR
FORCE
I COST INDEX1
I
SPACE COMMAND
1.08
~SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO
STUDENTS
) SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
16. PERSONNEL
1 OFF1 ENL / CIV
OFF1 ENL lCIV[
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
a. As of 30 SEP 99
1 6741 13921
4791
1
I
I
I
I
I 285451
1 6671 13281
514)
1 2,509l
b. End FY 2005
I
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total
Acreage:
(
4,172)
la.
Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
2,568,742
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
Ibe
1:: Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
8,450
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
18,500
1:: Planned
In Next Three Program
Years:
6,600
Remaining
Deficiency:
31,212
lg.
Ih. Grand Total:
2,633,504
PROJECTS
REQUESTED
IN
THIS
PROGRAM:
FY
2001
18.
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
ICODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
~
~START
-CMPL
I
1610-243
ADD TO OPERATIONAL
SUPPORT
4,450 SM
8,450
TURN KEY
FACILITY
I
TOTAL:
8,450
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1131-132
SBIRS MISSION
CONTROL STATION
4,894 SM 18,500
BACKUP
I
TOTAL:
18,500
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
1442-758
SECURE AREA LOGISTICS
COMPLEX
6,000 SM
6,600
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A space wing; the Space Warfare
Center;
(the Air Force Space Battlelab;
an intelligence
squadron;
an AF Reserves
space group;
the JOINT National
Test Bed.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
I
1
1
I
I
I
I
(12.
Air pollution:
E:
Water pollution:
Occupational
safety
cd.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
0
0
0
0
and health:
Backlog
This
Installation
1
14,912
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
89
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
I
(computer
generated)
14. PROJECT TITLE
AND LOCATION
IADD TO OPERATIONAL
SUPPORT
I
IFACILITY
~SCHRIEVER AIR FORCE BASE, COLORADO
15. PROGRAM ELEMENTIG.
CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
1
3.59.96
FY 2001
I
610-243
ITEM
SUPPORT
IADD TO OPERATIONAL
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
1 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
I PAVEMENTS
1 ELECTRICAL
SUBSTATION
1 DEMOLITION
ISUBTOTAL
[TOTAL CONTRACT COST
[SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
ITOTAL REQUEST
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
I
GLEN983007C
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
8,450
UNIT
COST
1,370
I
U/MjQUANTITY
: SM I 4,450
FACILITY
I
I
I
I
I
/
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
/
1
AND OVERHEAD
(5.7%)
COST
($000)
6,097
1,915
t
LS /
Is
LS
ILS
ISM
(
485)
200)
(
60
5,670
1
/
I
I
1
(
(
(
340)
550)
340)
8,012
8,012
457
8,469
8,450
I
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Reinforced
concrete
foundation
110.
Steel
framed
structure
with
roofing
system
and
exterior
(and floor
slab.
utilities,
fire
[finish
that matches
the existing
facility.
Elevator,
Isupression,
parking,
and all
necessary
support
are included.
Provide
/minimum
antiterrorism/force
protection
measures.
Demolish
remaining
IGovernment
owned modular
facilities
(5,670 SM) .
IAir Conditioning:
370 KW.
1
111.
REQUIREMENT:
14,775
SM ADEQUATE:
10,325
SM SUBSTANDARD:
4,450 SM
[PROJECT:
Construct
an addition
to the Operational
Support
Facility.
I (Current
Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
Permanent,
adequately
sized work space is required
for
Isupporting
Air Force satellite
operations.
To meet mission
growth
Irequirements,
support
space must be constructed
to free-up
operational
lspace in expensive
technical
facilities.
Specifically,
this project
will
lprovide
space for the Contracting
function
which oversees
mission
critical
Icontracts
supporting
the Air Force Satellite
Control
Network
(AFSCN), the
ISpace Warfare
Center,
the Cheyenne Mountain
Training
System,
five solar
Iobservatories,
and remote
site
integration.
This project
also provides
a
/permanent
facility
for Detatchment
11, Space and Missile
Systems Center
to
Iprovide
on-site
integrated
engineering
services
to support
Air Force
Jsatellite
systems,
the Space Warfare
Center,
the Defense
Support
Program
Positioning
System (GPS), and the MILSTAR Satellite
1 (DSP) , the Global
ICommunications
System
(MILSATCOM).
This project
will
also provide
space
[for the Consolidated
Program
Management
Office,
the Defense
Security
IService,
and the Air Force Office
of Special
Investigation.
/CURRENT SITUATION:
Schriever
AFB has experienced
substantial
mission
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete,
Page No
I
90
II-
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
(computer
generated)
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
I
[SCHRIEVER
AIR FORCE BASE, co~owo
14. PROJECT TITLE
ADD TO OPERATIONAL
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
12. DATE
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
GLEN983007C
SUPPORT FACILITY
rowth with the increasing
presence
of DOD satellite
programs.
During
ithis
time,
there
has been little
corresponding
growth
in infrastructure.
IRequirements
now far exceed the space available.
The functions
described
lare forced
to occupy temporary
facilities
or are using
facilities
designed
lfor
technical
requirements.
These temporary
facilities
are six and eleven
[years
old and are absorbing
many times
the costs required
to operate
and
Imaintain
permanent
facilities.
During
the first
five years,
the annual
lcosts
averaged
$75,000.
over the last
three
years,
annual
However,
[maintenance
and repair
costs have exceeded
$250,000.
The largest
(temporary
facility
consists
of approximately
67 trailers
bolted
together
Iplaced
on concrete
block
columns.
The unstable
foundation
requires
the
luse of scarce operations
and maintenance
funds to correct
severe settling
Iproblems.
Insufficient
insulation
and inefficient
heating
and air
(conditioning
results
in wasted energy
and large
utility
bills,
contrary
to
hampering
the mission
and
[DOD goals.
Roof leaks
are a constant
problem,
Idamaging
equipment.
Foundation
settlement
under the columns,
cracked
~columns,
uneven floors,
broken
tie-down
anchors,
and buckled
roof
Isheathing
are some of the safety
problems
experienced.
In May 1995, an
/architectural/engineering
study addressed
these issues
and identified
over
lone million
dollars
in repair
costs.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The follow-on
engineering
and contracting
support
Ifunctions
for the diversified
DOD satellite
missions
will
continue
to be
[housed
in degraded
temporary
facilities
with mission
disruption
and forced
Iwork-arounds.
As these temporary
facilities
age, they will
further
(deteriorate,
incurring
additional
operation
and maintenance
costs of up to
1$400,000
per year.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
[Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements".
An Economic
Analysis
has been
Iprepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
revitalization,
(leasing
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and
[benefits
of the respective
alternatives,
new construction
was found to be
lthe most cost efficient
over the life
of the project.
Base Civil
IEngineer:
Lt Co1 Carmelo
Cruz,
(7191567-4200.
Add to Operational
Support
/Facility:
4,450 SM = 47,899
SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page
No
91
Il.
I
JAIR
13.
I
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
FORCE
INSTALLATION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
generated)
AND LOCATION
ISCHRIEVER
AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
COLORADO
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
ADD TO OPERATIONAL
112.
I
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
SUPPORT
FACILITY
GLEN983007c
DATA:
Design
Data:
1 a(1)
Project
to be accomplished
by design-build
procedures
I
(2)
I
I
I
(3)
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design
Design
Recently
-
NO
Used
-
N/A
422
Allowance
(4)
Construction
Start
00 DEC
01 MAR
(5)
Construction
Completion
02 J-UN
(6)
Energy
(3a)
Construction
Contract Award Date
Study/Life-Cycle
lb.
Equipment
associated
lother
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
with
N/A
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
be provided
are
Y
be performed
obsolete.
from
Page
No
92
1.
COMPONENT1
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
AIR FORCE
IS. AREA CONSTI
14. COMMAND
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
[UNITED STATES
IUNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY,
I COST INDEX1
1.03
AIR FORCE ACADEMY
lCOLORAD0
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
OFF1 ENL lCIV\
OFF\ ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
1 OFF\ ENL 1 CIV
a.
As
of
30
SEP
99
1
9401
10261
19141
1
1821
1
211
400011901
8,2731
1
lb. End FY 2005
1 9251
8701 13361
1 1821
1 211 400011901
7,5241
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
53,276)
Ia* Total Acreage:
Inventory
Total
As
Of:
(30 SEP 99)
426,428
lbAuthorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
IC.
Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
18,960
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
17,944
Id* Authorization
1:: Planned In Next Three Program Years:
0
Deficiency:
36,490
!g- Remaining
/
Jh. Grand Total:
499,822
L
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
(CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
PROJECT
TITLE
ICODE
SCOPE
START
($000)
-CMPL 1
FY 2001
I
I
1171-157
10,219
SM 18,960
TURN KEY
TOTAL:
18,960
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1171-157
ADAL ATHLETIC
FACILITY
4,758 SM 10,700
18,183
SM
7,244
1171-853
UPGRADE ACADEMIC FACILITY,
PH4
TOTAL:
17,944
I
)9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Responsible
for providing
education
and
/training
for cadets
to become Air Force officers
with three
flying
Itraining
squadrons
supporting
T-41/T-3,
and glider
aircraft;
and an air
Ibase winq.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
112.
ADD TO ATHLETIC
FACILITY
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
0
0
0
0
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
74,374
Page
No
93
I
Il.
COMPONENT1
12. DATE
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
IAIR FORCE
(computer
generated)
INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
13.
IUNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY,
I
IADD TO ATHLETIC
FACILITY
ICOLORADO
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY CODE17.
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
I
I
171-157
8.58.96
I
I
XQPZ974011
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
iU/MjQUANTITYi
ISM 1 10,219
ITEM
(ADD TO ATHLETIC
FACILITY
[SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
DTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
[SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
[SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
[TOTAL REQUEST
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
I
I=
I
/
I
I
I
I
I
ILS I
I=
(5.7%)
18,960
1 COST
1 UNIT
COST
i ($000)
15,369
1 1,5041
I -2,375
I
/
I
I
1
985)
I I
I
I
I
I
(
760)
630)
17,744
17,744
1,011
18,755
18,960
/I II
Foundation,
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
/floor
slab,
and roof
to match existing
architecture
of
Iconcrete,
and stone.
Provide
all necessary
support.
IAir
Conditioning:
530 KW.
110.
perimeter
aluminum,
walls,
glass,
I
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
PROJECT:
Athletic
facility.
(Current
Mission)
II
REQUIREMENT:
Resolve
space
and code deficiencies
and progress
toward
meeting
gender
equity
requirements
of the National
Collegiate
Athletic
Association
(NCAA) and the Mountain
West Conference.
Construct
new
facility
to resolve
space
and functional
deficiencies
and to allow
the
(FY02 MILCON)
Phase 2, gender
equity,
reconfigurations
within
the Field
House.
Construct
space
for
sports
medicine,
weight
training,
sports
program
offices,
lockers,
team meeting
areas,
athlete
study
area,
sports
and athletic
education
area,
administrative
offices,
and storage.
CURRENT SITUATION:
All cadets
participate
in physical
education
and
either
intramural
or intercollegiate
athletic
competition.
The existing
cadet
athletic
facilities
were built
to accommodate
male cadet
sports
and
athletic
programs.
When female
cadets
entered
the Academy,
no additional
space
was provided.
All
ten women's
sports
intercollegiate
teams
have
been elevated
to NCAA Division
I competition
and the facility
requirements
(namely
locker
rooms and coaches
offices)
for women's
programs
have
increased
as a result.
Visiting
teams
either
dress
in hotel
rooms,
when
available,
or in make-shift
areas
because
of the lack
of a women's
visiting
team locker
room.
There are not enough
locker
rooms
to
accommodate
men and women referees
and multiple
teams.
Training
and
nedical
treatment
areas
are inadequate.
The lack
of private
examining
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
1
94
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
IAIR
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
13.
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
IUNITED STATES AIR
14. PROJECT TITLE
FORCE ACADEMY,
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
I
COLORADO
15. PROJECT
NUMBER (
I
I
I
XQPZ974011
(ADD TO ATHLETIC
FACILITY
I
rooms and insufficient
treatment
and rehabilitation
space results
in
[crowded and unprofessional
conditions
and less than optimum
treatment.
[The existing
weight
rooms are too small
to meet the number of cadets
(requiring
strength
training.
Due to the space shortage,
teams must be
Ischeduled
for less time in the weight
rooms than needed,
diminishing
the
[effectiveness
of the training
and adversely
affecting
cadets'
fitness
and
Istrength.
The medical
and strength
training
shortfalls
are further
with the institutional
schedule
of
Iexacerbated
by educational
constraints;
Iclasses
and meals,
all
athletes
must be scheduled
for the weight
and
Imedical
training
rooms during
a single
I-hour
block
in the afternooon.
[Accessibility
and utility
code deficiencies
require
mitigation.
(IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Locker
and medical/training
rooms have NCAA
Igender-equity
deficiencies
and fall
short
of NCAA Division
I standards.
ISpace and program
shortfalls
will
be written
up as deficiencies
in the
Athletic
training
[year 2000 NCAA certification
visit
to the Academy.
(shortfalls
preclude
effective
injury
prevention
work and result
in less
[than ideal
treatment
and rehabilitation
results.
Personnel
will
continue
[to be exposed
to accessibility,
heating,
ventilation,
and air conditioning
lcode deficiencies.
(ADDITIONAL:
There is no criteria/scope
for this
project
in Air Force
[Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
However,
the requirements
for
[this
project
were developed
by an engineering
study and validated
by an
(independent
AFCEE team.
All known options
were considered
during
the
jdevelopment
of this
project.
No other
option
could meet the mission
[requirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was needed or performed.
A
[certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Resolution
of gender equity
land other
deficiencies
will
only be achieved
after
completion
of this
Iproject
and the FY02 Phase 2 project.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Co1 Susanne
IWaylett
(719) 333-2660.
Athletic
Facilities:
10,219
SM = 110,000
SF
I
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
95
Il.
COMPONENT/
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
JAIR FORCE
INSTALLATION
AND
LOCATION
13.
I
IUNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY, coLoRAD0
14. PROJECT TITLE
ADD TO ATHLETIC
112.
a.
Estimated
12. DATE
I
DATA
I
15. PROJECT NUMBER 1
I
I
XQPZ974011
FACILITY
SUPPLEMENTAL
I
PROJECT
--
DATA:
Design
Data:
I
I
(1)
(2)
Project
to be accomplished
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design
Was Most
(3)
Design
@a)
Construction
by design-build
Design
Recently
procedures
NO
N/A
Used
-
948
Allowance
(4)
Contract Award
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
Date
00 NOV
01 JAN
I
/
I
Study/Life-Cycle
lb.
Equipment
associated
lother
appropriations:
02 DEC
Completion
with
N/A
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
Y
be performed
be provided
from
L
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
96
DATE
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
(computer
qenerated)
AIR FORCE
(5. AREA CONST(
(4. COMMAND
AND LOCATION
13. INSTALLATION
[AIR FORCE DISTRICT
IBOLLING
AIR FORCE BASE, DISTRICT
OF
I COST INDEX1
0.95
IOF WASHINGTON
ICOLUMBIA
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
STRENGTH
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL lCIV[
OFF1 ENL [CIVl TOTAL
I
1 3821 12511
7221
1
la. As of 30 SEP 99
I
I 3011 7841 401 3,4801
1 3011
7841 401
3,4461
lb. End FY 2005
1 3811 12341
7061
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
(
607)
la. Total Acreage:
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
2,520,903
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
Ic. Authorization
Id. Authorization
Requested
In This Program:
4,520
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
6,409
le. Authorization
(f. Planned
In Next Three Program
Years:
0
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
18,500
1
Ih. Grand Total:
2,550,332
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
I
(CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS (
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
~($000)
~START
-CMPL 1
II
(740-884
CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
2,550 SM
4,520
JAN 99 SEP 001
TOTAL :
4,520
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Following
Program
(FY 2002)
1610-282
HERITAGE HALL
4,314 SM
6,409
TOTAL:
6,409
1
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Supports
Air Force personnel
in the
[National
Capitol
Region.
Headquarters
USAF functions
include
Chief of
IChaplains,
Surgeon
General,
and Historian;
Headquarters
Air Force Office
lof Special
Investigations;
Air Force Office
of Scientific
Research;
Air
/Force Real Estate
Agency;
Air Force Legal
Services
Agency;
Air Force
[Medical
Operating
Agency;
USAF Band; USAF Honor Guard;
a support
wing,
the
I
/Defense
Intelligence
Agency,
and an intelligence
group.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
1.
I
I
112.
COMPONENT1
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
b.
a-
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
0
0
0
0
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
2,650
Page
No
:
97
Il.
COMPONENT\
I
I
[AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12.
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
JB~LLING
AIR FORCE BASE WASHINGTON,
DC
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY CODE17.
I
]
9.12.12
I
I
ICHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
I
I
740-884
9.
4,520
BXUR980010
COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
JCHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER
JSUPPORTING FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
1 SITE IMPROVEMENTS
( PAVEMENTS
1 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
jSUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
ISUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
ITOTAL REQUEST
(TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
DATE
I
FY 2001
I
I
ILS
ILS
ILS
ILS
I
I
I
I
UNIT
COST
1U/M QUANTITY1
2,550
1 1,370
ISM
I
(6%)
I
COST
($000)
3,494
770
( 310)
( 110)
( 120)
( 230)
4,264
4,264
4,520
I
I
I
I
110.
Reinforced
concrete
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Ifoundation,
floor
slab,
masonry
walls,
roof
system,
fire
protection,
all
Iutilities,
site
preparation
including
partial
demolition
of existing
Itennis
courts,
perimeter
fence,
and all necessary
support
ammenities.
IFunctional
areas
include
reception
area,
multi-purpose
child
care rooms,
[rest
rooms,
kitchen,
and playground.
(Air Conditioning:
180 KW.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT: 5,122 SM ADEQUATE:
1,506 SM SUBSTANDARD: 1,055 SM
[PROJECT:
Construct
a child
development
center.
(Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
This facility
requirement
is in accordance
with the Military
IChild
Care Act of 1989.
A properly
sized child
development
center
is
[required
to provide
supervised
care and a development
experience
for
Idependent
children
aged six weeks through
five
years.
The facility
must
[provide
a comfortable,
clean,
educational
environment
where military
[service
members
and DOD civilians
can leave their
children
on an hourly,
Idaily,
or part-time
basis,
and provide
secure and early
developmental
care
[for
children.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
CDC was built
in 1979.
The capacity
is
Ilimited
to 104 children.
The center
has a waiting
list
of over 350
Jchildren.
Because of the large number of children,
the center
is filled
/to capacity
early
each morning,
requiring
parents
in need of child
care to
[find
other providers
in the civilian
community.
Additional
space is
(needed.
Total
child
care need is 619 spaces.
With completion
of a
/previous
MILCON project
we will
meet only 39% of the need, far short of
[DOD'S 65% by 2002 standard.
This project
will
bring
us to 544 spaces or
188% of the need.
BY the year 2005, DOD requires
that we meet
80% of the
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
I
I
1
98
1. COMPONENT1
I
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
BOLLING AIR FORCE BASE WASHINGTON,
4. PROJECT TITLE
CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
I
DC
15. PROJECT NUMBER 1
I
I
BXUR980010
CENTER
need.
Bolling
AFB will
continue
to be out of
Without
the new facility,
compliance.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Military
personnel
and their
dependents
will
continue
to use inadequate
facilities
and the waiting
list
will
continue
to grow.
Lack of quality
child
care will
contribute
to personnel
absenteeism,
low morale,
and has a negative
impact
on the military
and
civilian
work force.
ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
Handbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements"
and DOD1 6060.2,
"Child
Development
Center
Programs,"
published
January
1993.
An economic
analysis
was prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of status
quo, expansion,
and new construction.
Expansion
was the recommended
alternative
that
would provide
the additional
space needed at the Child
Development
Center
at the lower life
cycle
cost.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Co1 Randall
Thady
(2021767-5566.
Child
Development
Center:
2,550 SM = 27,438
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 99