Department of the Air Force
Military Construction and Family
Housing Program
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
Budget Estimates
Justification Data Submitted to Congress
February 2000
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents
Fiscal Year (FY) 2001
President’s Budget
Page Number
General
Table of Contents ................................................................
1
Program Summary ..............................................................
3
Militarv Construction
State Summary (List of Projects) .......................................
5
New Mission/Current Mission Exhibit ..............................
13
Installation Index ................................................................
21
Special Program Considerations:
Statements .........................................................................
23
Congressional Reporting Requirements ........................
24
Research and Development .............................................
26
Third Party Financing .....................................................
27
Appropriation Language ....................................................
29
Inside the United States Construction Projects.. ..............
31
Outside the United States Construction Projects.. ...........
231
Unspecified Minor Construction .......................................
259
Planning and Design ...........................................................
261
Working Capital Funds Construction Projects.. ..............
263
1
Inside the United States Construction Projects
11. COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
I
IBARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, LOUISIANA
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IDORMITORY
(96 RM)
PROJECT
DATA
15.
I
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(1)
(2)
PROJECT
NUMBER
Definitive
Design
Was Most'Recently
00 JAN 19
Y
1%
00 MAR 15
00 SEP 01
Y
be performed
costs
NO
N/A
Used
-
Total
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
(a)
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
(b)
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
(c)
(d)
Contract
In-house
(e)
(3a)
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
Construction
1
I
AWUBO33010
($000)
383
192
575
479
96
01 JAN
01 MAR
(3)
(5)
I
I
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
(a)
Date Design
Started
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Percent
Complete
as of Jan 2000
* (c)
Date 35% Designed.
*cd)
(e)
Date Design
Complete
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(f)
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
(b)
Where Design
12. DATE
I
Completion
02 SEP
*
b.
lother
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
with
N/A
this
project
will
be provided
from
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Paw
No 1~;~
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
PROGRAM
12. DATE
1
I
I
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
IAIR
EDUCATION
COST INDEX\
I
I
AND TRAINING
COMMAND
0.89
IKEESLER AIR FORCE BASE, MISSISSIPPI
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
\
SUPPORTED
PERSONNEL
16.
1 OFF/ ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
TOTAL
I STRENGTH
)
As
of
30
SEP
99
1
8591
3147)
1880)
447)
2693)
78)
1680)
84)
10,868)
la.
lb. End FY 2005
) 8541 31091 18781 4391 28191
1 781 16801 841 10,941
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
1,611)
Total
Acreage:
(
la.
Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
7,743,382
c.
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
0
lb(d. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
15,040
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
0
le. Authorization
Planned
In
Next
Three
Program
Years:
0
Iflg. Remaining
Deficiency:
13,400
Ih. Grand Total:
7‘771,822
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
:
(CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS I
PROJECT TITLE
ICODE
SCOPE
CMPL
1
~($000)
~START
-
I
AND LOCATION
TECHNICAL
1171-623
TRAINING
I
FACILITY
10,300
SM 15,040
TURN KEY
TOTAL:
15,040
Included
in the Followinq
Proqram
(FY 2002)
NONE
19a.
Future
Projects:
19b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three Years:
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
Headquarters
Second Air
Force;
a
Itraining
wing
responsible
for communications,
electronics,
and
[administrative
courses
and a C-12/C-21
airlift
squadron
responsible
for
laircrew
training;
an Air
Force
Materiel
Command engineering
installation
an Air Force
Reserve
airlift
wing with
one C-130 airlift
squadron
I group;
land one WC-130 weather
reconnaissance
squadron;
and a major
Air Force
Imedical
center.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
E:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
40
30
0
0
28,505
Page
No 152
Il.
12. DATE
I
COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
I
I
(computer
generated)
-.
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
I
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
I
ITECHNICAL
TRAINING
FACILITY
~KEESLER AIR FORCE BASE, MISSISSIPPI
PROGRAM
ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE17.
PROJECT
NUMBER
(8.
PROJECT
COST(SOOO)
15.
I
I
(
I
I
8.57.96
171-623
9.
COST
I
t
I
I'ECHNICAL
TRAINING
SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
I
QUANTITY)
SM : 10,300
gJ
ITEM
FACILITY
LS
LS
LS
LS
SM
LS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
ASBESTOS/LEAD-BASED
PAINT
REMOVAL
DEMOLITION
TRANSPORTATION
YARD RELOCATION
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL
CONTRACT
COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
TOTAL
REQUEST
TOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
15,040
MAHGO23000
ESTIMATES
1 UNIT
1
COST
1 1,0841
)
I
I
/
12,948
1
851
I
I
(6%)
I
1I 1I
I
COST
($000)
11,165
3,024
480)
448)
I
560)
360)
( 1,101)
I
1
!
14,189
851
15,040
15,040
I
Two-story
facility
consisting
Description
of Proposed Construction:
[of concrete
foundation,
with steel
frame, precast
concrete
curtain
walls,
[metal roofing
system,
fire
protection
system,
parking,
utilities
and all
[necessary
support.
Includes
relocation
of transportation
yard and
(demolition
of one facility
(12,948 SM) .
IAir Conditioning:
770 KW.
110.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
105,995
I
1
I
I
/
SM ADEQUATE:
69,309 SM SUBSTANDARD: 66,398 SMI
training
facility.
(Current
Mission)
I
facility
with laboratory,
high-bay
and
Iclassroom
areas which can be configured
to meet varied
and changing
Irequirements
to support
technical
training
in fields
to include
radar and
Isatellite
systems,
flight
simulations,
combat controller,
and air traffic
Icontrol.
Facility
will
be used to train
600 students-per-day.
[CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
facility
was built
in 1941 and is
[obsolete
for current
training
requirements.
This facility
has not
Iundergone
any modernization
program or reconfiguration
suitable
for
lcurrent
training
programs.
The mechanical
system in this
facility
is
[difficult
to maintain.
During the summer, some classrooms
and labs become
[extremely
cold while others
are extremely
warm.
In order to continue
/training
in these cold areas,
students
and staff
are forced
to wear coats
land gloves.
This condition
makes it very difficult
to work on laboratory
Iequipment,
simulators
and computer keyboards.
The existing
electrical
[distribution
system has reached its capacity
and does not meet current
[National
Electric
Code requirements.
Ungrounded wiring
and overloaded
Icircuits
are safety
hazards
causing breakers
and other
power equipment
to
[fail
on a monthly
basis.
These power failures
interrupt
traininq
and
1
IPROJECT:
Construct
a technical
IREQUIREMENT:
An energy efficient
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
Page No 153
11.
iIAIR
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
13.
I
JKEESLER AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
ITECHNICAL
TRAINING
PROJECT
DATA
(2.
I
DATE
I
I
I
MISSISSIPPI
15.
I
FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
1
1
I
MAHG023000
Lighting
levels
are 40% below
standards
for
lcause
training
delays.
The existing
facility
has no fire
sprinkler
Iclassrooms
and laboratories.
Isystem
which
is a National
Fire
Code requirement.
Asbestos
and lead paint
/materials
are located
throughout
the facility.
Students
and faculty
will
continue
to train
in
/IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Isubstandard
classrooms
and laboratories.
Obsolete
mechanical
systems
will
(continue
to waste
energy.
The existing
facility
will
not adequately
meet
Keesler
AFB will
not be able
lthe
requirements
of the training
squadrons.
[to conduct
technical
training
on systems
being
developed
for the next
Icentury.
This
project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
IADDITIONAL:
IHandbook
32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
An economic
analysis
has been
Iprepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
revitalization,
Ileasing
and status
quo operation.
New construction
was found
to be the
Base Civil
Engineer:
Imost cost
efficient
over
the life
of the project.
Technical
Training
Facility:
lLtCo1
Wendell
Trivette.
(228)
377-2615.
110,300
SM = 110,828
SF
I
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
154
11. COMPONENT1
FY 2001 MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
I
I
(computer
qenerated)
IAIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
AND LOCATION
I
]=ESLER
AIR FORCE BASE, MISSISSIPPI
PROJECT
TITLE
14.
TECHNICAL
112.
a.
I
I
I
TRAINING
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
(1)
(2)
I
Design
Project
to
be accomplished
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
Where Design
(b)
Definitive
Was Most
i
(5)
Construction
I
(6)
Energy
Iziher
15. PROJECT NUMBER
I
MAHG023000
by design-build
\
I
Design
Recently
procedures
NO
N/A
Used
-
Design
Completion
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
I
Data:
(4)
(3a)
DATE
DATA:
I
(3)
(2.
I
DATA
FACILITY
Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
I
PROJECT
--.
DEC 76
with
N/A
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
03 SEP
Y
be performed
be provided
are
752
01 JUL
01 SEP
obsolete.
from
Page
No
155
(1.
I
IAIR
13.
12. DATE
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
PROGRAM
14. COMMAND
AND LOCATION
I
15.
I
I
AREA CONSTI
COST INDEX1
1.01
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
(WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
1
OFF1
ENL
1
CIV
OFF1
ENL
ICIVl
OFF1 ENL lCIV/
TOTAL
STRENGTH
I
1 3161 30371
6151
I
II221
921 911
4,1731
Ia. As of 30 SEP 99
lb. End FY 2005
1 3171 30421
6121
1 221
921 911
4,1761
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
I
I
5,214)
Total
Acreage:
(
I
lalb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
3,862,814
c. Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
0
Id. Auth orization
Requested
In This Program:
12,050
(FY 2002)
Included
In Following
Program:
0
le. Authorization
11,500
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
62,820
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
Ih. Grand Total:
3,949,184
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
i
COST
DESIGN STATUS
ICATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
CMPL
CODE
~($000)
___
I1422-264
B-2 CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS
966 SM
4,150
TURN KEY
IGLOOS
I
1422-275
B-2 MUNITIONS
ASSEMBLY AREA
LS
7,900
TURN KEY
12,050
TOTAL:
1
Included
in the Followinq
Proqram
(FY 2002)
NONE
Future
Projects:
1:;:
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
1422-264
B-2 CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS
975 SM 11,500
STORAGE
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A bomber
wing with
two squadrons
of B-2
I
(and 11 T-38 aircraft;
and an Air Force
Reserve
fighter
wing with
one
I
IA/AO-10
squadron.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
111.
I
a.
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
Occupational
safety
C.
b*
d.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
0
0
0
0
and health:
Previous
Backlog
editions
This
Installation
are
obsolete.
18,487
Page
No 156
/
I
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
[AIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
I*- PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
IB-2 CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS
I
(IGLOOS
(WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16. CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER IS. PROJECT COST($OOO)
(1.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
1
1.11.27
I
422-264
9.
YWHG989206
COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ITEM
IB-2 CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS
IGLOOS
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
PAVEMENTS
/ SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LIGHTNING
PROTECTION
DUAL-ACCESS
DOORS/RETAINING
WALLS
SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
1U/M
ISM
I
DEC 76
Previous
I
4,150
I
ILS
ISM
ILS
I:LS
LS
(5.7%)
1 UNIT 1 COST
JUANTITYI
COST
1 ($000)
966 1 2,117/
2,045
1,870
( 200)
75
15,000
1
(1,125)
( 300)
(
35)
( 210)
3,915
3,915
223
4,138
4,150
I
I
I
1
1
/
/
I
I
110.
Munitions
storage
module
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
ligloos
24 M long constructed
from reinforced
concrete.
Provide
earth
Icover,
double
steel
doors,
detection/alarm
systems,
sensor
support
Isystems,
energency
backup
power
support,
communications
support,
access
pavements
for munitions
trailers
and other
necessary
support.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
23 SM ADEQUATE:
7 SM SUBSTANDARD:
11 SM
IPROJECT:
Construct
five
B-2 conventional
munitions
igloos.
(New Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
The B-2 mission
expansion
includes
conventional
munitions
Icapability.
Facilities
are required
to store
these
modern
conventional
Imunitions.
These new munitions
include
GBU-28,
Joint
Stand Off Weapon
Air-to-Surface
Stand-off
Missile
(JASSM),
and the Joint
) (JSOW , Joint
[Direct
Attack
Munition
(JDAM) . These
facilities
will
be equipped
with
(lightning
protection,
security
system,
and back-up
power.
/CURRENT SITUATION:
The initial
shipments
of these
new smart
conventional
Imunitions
were
to be delivered
in FY98 but were stored
at other
bases
due
Ito non-availability
of the facility.
Seven B-2 igloos
have been
Iconstructed
for the B-2 beddown
for weapons
storage.
These
igloos
include
(capability
for
access
by B-2 mission
specific
launcher
equipment
and
Itrailers.
The eleven
small
existing
substandard
igloos
were built
in 1953
[for
conventional
weapons
storage
and training.
[IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Part
of the current
taskings
for
the B-2
[envisions
the ability
to strike
and restrike
using
conventional
munitions
(from
Whiteman.
The storage
for B-2 conventional
weapons
including
B-2
[mission
specific
operational
equipment
is not/will
not be available.
IMission
implementation
will
be curtailed
without
adequate
launcher
loading
land readiness
required
for the B-2 mission.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
DD FORM 1391,
1
I
I
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
i
i
157
(1.
I
IAIR
13.
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
generated)
)B-2
CONVENTIONAL
)
AND LOCATION
I
IWHITEMAN
AIR FORCE
TITLE
14. PROJECT
I
12. DATE
I
BASE,
MISSOURI
15. PROJECT NUMBER 1
I
MUNITIONS
IGLOOS
I
YWHG989206
I
II Facility
Requirements."
All
known alternative
options
IHandbook 32-1084,
(were considered
during
the development
of this project.
No other
option
lcould meet the mission requirements;
therefore,
no economic analysis
was
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
[needed or performed.
Base
Lt Co1 Myers 816-687-3503.
966 SM =
ICivil
Engineer:
Munitions
Igloos:
110,398 SF
DD FORM
1391C,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 158
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
JAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
PROGRAM
14. COMMAND
12. DATE
I
AREA CONST(
COST INDEX1
I
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
1.01
[WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
I
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
I
I
16. PERSONNEL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL [CIV]
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
TOTAL 1
I STRENGTH
6151
I
II221
921 911
4,1731
la. As of 30 SEP 99
) 3161 30371
) 221
) 3171 30421
6121
92) 91)
4,176
lb. End FY 2005
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
5,214)
(
la. Total Acreage:
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
3,862,814
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
Ice
(d. Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
12,050
(FY 2002)
0
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
11,500
If.
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
lg. Remaining
Deficiency:
62,820
Ih. Grand Total:
3,949,184
FY 2001
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
ICATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
ICODE
($000)
-CMPL 1
I
I
1422-264
B-2 CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS
966 SM
4,150
TURN KEY
IGLOOS
I
LS
(422-275
B-2 MUNITIONS
ASSEMBLY AREA
7,900
TURN KEY
TOTAL:
12,050
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Followinq
Program
(FY 2002)
NONE
1:;:
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
B-2 CONVENTIONAL
MUNITIONS
975 SM 11,500
1422-264
I
STORAGE
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A bomber
wing with
two squadrons
of B-2
1
land 11 T-38 aircraft;
and an Air
Force
Reserve
fighter
wing with
one
(A/AO-10
squadron.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
AND LOCATION
15.
I
I
I
112.
a.
Air pollution:
Water
pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
bd.
Other
Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
0
0
0
0
and health:
Backlog
This
Installation
18,487
I
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 159
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
(AIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
12. DATE
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IWHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
15. PROGRAM ELEMENTl6.
CATEGORY CODEI7.
I
1
1.11.27
I
422-275
I
IB-2 MUNITIONS
ASSEMBLY AREA
PROJECT NUMBER 18. PROJECT COST($OOO)
I
I
YWHG989205R3
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
ITEM
MUNITIONS
ASSEMBLY AREA
BOMB BUILD-UP
FACILITY
BUILT-UP
MUNITIONS
STORAGE
RELOCATE SUPPORT OFFICE
RELOCATE RRR TRAINING
AREA/GOV PARKING
CANOPY
[SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
PAVEMENTS/ROADS/PARKING
UTILITIES/GENE~TOR/WATER/SEWER/FENCE
CRANE/LIGHTNING
PRO/SECURITY/COMM
SUP
1SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
[SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
[TOTAL REQUEST
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
IB-2
I
I
I
I
7,900
1
\
1
I
1
1
I
( 210) I
( 175)
2,266
1,300
SM 1 14,900
SM I
930
COST
COST
1 ($000)
5,191
I
I
1 1,459/
(1,897)
1
751 (1,118)
) 1,9261
(1,791)
LS I
I
I
U/MIQUANTITYI
LS I
SM I
SM
SM
LS
LS
350
I UNIT I
I
500 (
I
751 (1,320)
1 ( 325)
17,600
1
I
1
-
I
(
621)
7,457
7,457
425
7,882
7,900
-L
. .
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
A concrete
apron assembly
area
lfor built-up
munitions
storage.
The bomb build-up
facility
will
have a
Iconcrete
foundation
and slab,
metal
siding
and roof;
with roll-up
doors,
(bridg e crane,
compressed
air system,
security
system and office
area.
IRelocate
support
office
and RRR training
site.
Support
includes
site
Iimprovements,
lightning
protection,
utilities,
and roads.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
16,200
LS ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
0
IPROJECT:
Construct
conventional
munitions
assembly
area.(New
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
The B-2 mission
expansion
includes
conventional
munitions
Icapability.
A facility
is required
to assemble
and preload
modern
[conventional
munitions
on B-2 launchers.
These new conventional
munition
[types
include
GBU-28,
Joint
Standoff
Weapon (JSOW), Joint
Air-to-Surface
IStandoff
Missile
(JASSM),
and the Joint
Direct
Attack
Munition
(JDAM).
IThis
facility
will
handle
dual build-up
lines
with drive
through
safety
land night
time operations.
It includes
an and administrative
area to
[support
supply
& munitions
handlers.
An adequate
area is also required
to
Itemporarily
store
pre-built
and pre-loaded
munitions
on trailers
(holding
Iarea).
A support
office
and training
area must be moved to avoid
[violating
quantity-distance
criteria
driven
by the addition
of
Iconventional
munitions.
ICURRENT SITUATION:
The initial
shipments
of these new smart conventional
Imunitions
were to be delivered
in FY98, but were stored
at other
bases due
Ito the lack of facilities
at Whiteman
AFB.
Currently
there
is a very
[limited
area to build
munitions
(one trailer
at a time)
while
following
IDOD and Air Force directives
for munitions
distance
and fragmentation
[criteria.
The area is small
and inhabited
by non-related
functions.
When
it is necessary
to build
munitions,
personnel
in non-related
functions
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
1
Page
No
:
1
160
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
Ix- INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
I
I
/
JWHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IB-2
MUNITIONS
ASSEMBLY
MISSOURI
15.
I
AREA
PROJECT
NUMBER
YWHG989205R3
1
I
I
The original
B-2 mission
did not include
a large
Imust be evacuated.
therefore
facilities
or site
areas
for mass
conventional
munitions
role,
[build-up
of heavy
blast
munitions
are not available.
Part
of the current
taskings
for the B-2
(IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
(envisions
the ability
to strike
and restrike
using
conventional
munitions
Ifrom
Whiteman.
The current
munition
assembly
facility
cannot
support
a
Ifull
generation
or regeneration
tasking
for conventional
munitions.
The
IB-2 conventional
munitions
mission
capability
will
be significantly
Ireduced.
Mission
implementation
will
be curtailed
without
adequate
Imunitions
asembly
area required
for the B-2 mission.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in AFH
All known
alternative
options
were
(32-1084,
Facility
Requirements."
No other
option
could
Iconsidered
during
the development
of this
project.
[meet the mission
requirements;
therefore,
no economic
analysis
was needed
[or performed.
A certificate
of exception
has been prepared.
Base Civil
816-687-3503.
[Engineer:
Lt Co1 Brevard.
Phone:
Bomb build-up
facility:
11,300
SM = 13,993
SF; Built-up
Munitions
Storage:
14,900
SM = 160,382
SF;
[Support
Office:
930 SM = 10,010
SF; Canopy:
350 SM = 3,767
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
161
11. COMPONENT1
I
I
JAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
PROJECT
12.
I
DATA
DATE
I
I
I
I
I
IWBITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IB-2
I
112.
a.
MUNITIONS
SUPPLEMENTAL
Estimated
(1)
I
(2)
/
I
I
I
ASSEMBLY
MISSOURI
15.
I
AREA
PROJECT
NUMBER
)
I
YWBG989205R3
DATA:
Design
Project
to
Data:
be accomplished
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
Where Design
(b)
by design-build
procedures
I
Definitive
Was Most
(3)
@a)
(4)
Desiqn
Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(5)
Construction
(6)
Energy
Design
Recently
-
'
Used
NO
-
N/A
I
I
1
395
01 JAN
1
01 AUG \
Completion
02 SEP
I
lb-
lother
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
with
N/A
analysis
this
Previous
project
editions
was/will
will
be performed
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page
No
162
Il.
COMPONENT]
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
(computer
qenerated)
15. AREA CONSTI
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
COST INDEX1
IAIR FORCE
I
1.12
FORCE BASE, MONTANA
SPACE COMMAND
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
OFF1 ENL ]CIVl
OFF1 ENL lCIVl
TOTAL
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
FY 2001
IMALMSTROM AIR
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
a. As of 30 SEP 99
b. End FY 2005
I
I
I
I
I
I 3f9091
1 5051 30291
3751
1 3,8441
1 5041 29401
4001
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total
Acreage:
(
3,687)
3,549,051
Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 97)
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
5,500
Authorization
Requested
In This
Program:
5,300
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
0
Planned
In Next Three
Program
Years:
16,953
Remaining
Deficiency:
30,000
Ih. Grand Total:
3,606,804
18. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
FY 2001
I
/CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS 1
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
START
SCOPE
~($000)
___
-CMPL 1
/1212-216
MINUTEMAN THREE MISSILE
2,468
SM
5,300
TURN KEY
SERVICE FACILITY
5,300
TOTAL :
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Followinq
Proqram
(FY 2002) NONE
1:;:
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned
Next Three
Years:
1141-753
HELICOPTER
OPERATIONS FACILITY
930 SM
2,250
1215-582
WEAPONS STORAGE AREA PHASE 1
1,800
SM 12,003
1730-832
CONVERT COMMERCIAL GATE
2,700
LS
110.
Mission
or Major
Functions:
A missile
wing consisting
of four
IMinuteman
intercontinental
ballistic
missile
squadrons
(conversion
from
IMinuteman
II to Minuteman III
on hold)
and UH-1 aircraft;
and an Air
IMobility
Command air refuelinq
qroup with one KC-135 squadron.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
0
0
0
0
cl:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
Installation
are
obsolete.
36,321
Page No 163
(2. DATE
(1. COMPONENT\
FY
2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT
DATA
I
I
I
(computer
generated)
IAIR FORCE
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
13. INSTALLATION
IMINUTEMAN
III
MISSILE
SERVICE
I
(FACILITY
IMALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA
15. PROGRAM ELEMENT16. CATEGORY CODE17. PROJECT NUMBER IS. PROJECT COST($OOO)I
I
1 3.59.96
212-216
9.
NZAS973000
COST ESTIMATES
I
I
ILS
ILS
ILS
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
) UNIT
COST
COST
i
($000)
1
1
1
4,145
1,700
(2,482)
1,650
(1,663)
870
I
(
(
450)
120)
(
300)
5,015
5,015
286
5,301
/
I
1
1
I
1
I
I
I
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
I
5,300
IU/M]QUANTITY~
ISM 1 2,468
ISM 1 1,460
ISM 1 1,008
ITEM
MISSILE
SERVICE FACILITY
AND CODES SHOPS
IMINUTEMAN III
1 ELECTRONICS
ADMINISTRATIVE
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
PAVEMENTS
SUBTOTAL
l'OTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
TOTAL REQUEST
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
I
I
L
/
5,300
I
10.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Reinforced
concrete
foundation
and floor
slab,
concrete
masonry walls,
sloped
steel
roof deck.
Includes
van configuration
support,
office
vehicle
and equipment
staging/storage,
classrooms,
two class
"A" vaults,
critical
component
storage,
space,
and all necessary
support.
Provides
minimum
technical
order
library,
Demolish
two facilities.
antiterrorism/force
protection
measures.
15 KW.
Air Conditioning:
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
2,468 SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
1,385
SM
Construct
a minuteman
three
(MMIII)
missile
service
facility.
IPROJECT:
I (Current
Mission)
A properly
sized,
[REQUIREMENT:
configured
and sited
facility
is required
(in which missile
control
codes and electronics
laboratory
(E-Lab)
[functions
can be accommodated.
This project
provides
space for missile
[codes production,
electronic
equipment
checkout
and repair,
critical
Icomponent
and equipment
storage,
staging
and issue,
vehicle
and equipment
Iloading,
vehicle
and team
dispatch
control,
precision
measurement
(equipment
laboratory
(PMEL) work area and storage,
training
areas,
and administrative
areas.
I classrooms,
[CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
building
no longer
meets
the needs of
Ieither
Codes or E-Lab functions.
Both organizations
are now forced
to
Iaccomplish
critical
tasks in cramped and crowded space.
They have
loutgrown
the current
space requirements
as a result
of scheduled
[modification/upgrades
to the Minuteman
III
ICBM system
(e.g.,the
guidance
[replacement
program).
The Codes and E-Lab sections
need additional
class
Il'A" vault
space which is currently
inadequate
for mission
needs.
The
current
vaults
are substandard
and require
multiple
waivers
of DoD and Air
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No 164
t
)
I
I
I
I
I
Il.
I
IAIR
COMPONENT1
I
FORCE
INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
13.
I
l! MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE,
I 4. PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT
DATA
III
MISSILE
DATE
MONTANA
15.
I
MINUTEMAN
12.
I
SERVICE
FACILITY
PROJECT
NUMBER
NZAS973000
Force
security
requirements.
Insufficient
equipment
cooling
capacity
requires
make-shift
duct work
be run directly
to test
equipment
racks
to
meet cooling
requirements.
When air conditioning
is lost
or cooling
loads
cannot
be met during
critical
component
testing,
that
testing
must be
reaccomplished.
Power
is commercially
supplied
with
no back up power
some test
equipment
may require
up to
supply
system.
When power
is lost,
a 3-day
warm-up
depending
on the duration
of power
loss.
In addition,
E-Lab
personnel
are forced
to perform
most vehicle
loading
and unloading
activities
outdoors
under
severe
weather
conditions
which
subjects
sensitive
electronic
nuclear
certified
components
to damaging
environments.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Missile
operations
and maintenance
functions
will
continue
to operate
in congested,
crowded
workcenters
that
detract
from
the quality
of work
performed
and the morale
of highly
trained
operators.
and technicians.
Storage
of nuclear
certfied
components
will
continue
to
displace
workers
leading
to further
congestion.
E-Lab personnel
will
continue
to perform
most vehicle
loading
and unloading
activities
outdoors
subjecting
sensitive
equipment
to extreme
weather
conditions.
Without
back-up
power,
testing
of critical
components
will
require
(reaccomplishment
after
power
outages
degrading
the efficiency
of the
Isquadron.
ADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in Air
Force
"Facility
Requirements."
Handbook
32-1084,
An economic
analysis
has been
prepared
comparing
the alternatives
of new construction,
revitalization,
and status
quo operation.
Based on the net present
values
and benefits
of
the respective
alternatives,
new construction
was found
to be the most
cost
efficient
over the life
of the project.
Base Civil
Engineer:
Lt co1
Don Gleason,
(406)731-6188.
Electronics
and Code Shops:
1,460SM
=
15,710SF;
Administrative:
1,008SM
= 10,846SF.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No
165
1
I
11.
I
(2.
COMPONENT1
FY 2001
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
IAIR
FORCE
(3.
INSTALLATION
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
I
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
I
I
IMA.LMSTROM
AIR FORCE
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
IMINUTEMAN
I
112.
III
Estimated
I
(1)
(2)
(3)
(3a)
(4)
MONTANA
15.
PROJECT
NUMBER
I
MISSILE
SUPPLEMENTAL
a.
BASE,
SERVICE
(
I
NZAS973000
FACILITY
DATA:
Design
Project
Data:
to be accomplished
by design-build
Basis:
Standard
or Definitive
(a)
(b)
Where Design Was Most
Design
Recently
procedures
NO
N/A
Used -
I
pesign Allowance
Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
265 (
00 DEC I
OlAPR)'
02 APR 1
I
I
I
(5)
Construction
I
(6)
Energy
Completion
I
Study/Life-Cycle
Equipment
associated
with
lother
appropriations:
N/A
lb-
analysis
this
project
was/will
will
be performed
be provided
y
I
I
from
i
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page No 166
12. DATE
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
I
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
COST INDEX\
JAIR
MOBILITY
I
I
1.17
COMMAND
JMCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE, NEW JERSEY
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV
OFF] ENL ICIV( OFF! ENL (CIV( TOTAL
STRENGTH
I
la. As of 30 SEP 99
1 5511 3618) 13481
1
I
1 1191 49211431
6,2711
1 119j
49211431
6,189 1
ib. End FY 2005
1 5521 3540i 1343i
j
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
I
Acreage:
(
3,661)
:
Ia- Total
lb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
9,407,518
0
Not Yet In Inventory:
Ic- Authorization
9,772
Id. Authorization
Requested In This Program:
(FY 2002)
0
Included
In Following
Program:
le. Authorization
(f. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
20,000
57,220
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
9,494,510
Jh. Grand Total:
1
IS. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
-CMPL
I1740-674
FITNESS CENTER
4,750 SM
9,772
JAN 99 SEP 00II
TOTAL:
9,772
J
1
Future
Projects:
Included
in the Followinq
Proqram (FY 2002) NONE
I
I;",:
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned Next Three Years:
1442-758
AIR FREIGHT TERMINAL/BASE
11,037 SM 20,000
SUPPLY COMPLEX
J
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
Headquarters
21st First
Air Force;an
air
I
Imobility
wing with two C-141B squadrons and two KC-1OA squadrons;
an Air
IMobility
Operations
Group (AMOG), the Air Mobility
Command Mobility
[Warfare
Center;
an Air Force Reserve C-141/KC-10
associate
air mobility
winq; and a NJ-ANG air refuelinq
wing with two KC-135 squadrons.
111.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
JAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
I
/
I
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
safety
and health:
c- Occupational
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog This
0
0
0
0
;:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
Installation
are
obsolete.
65,668
Page
No
167
Il.
(2.
COMPONENT\
FY 2001
I
I
JAIR
13.
FORCE
INSTALLATION
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND LOCATION
I
~M~GUIRE
AIR FORCE BASE,
NEW JERSEY
(5. PROGRAM ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODE(7.
I
4.18.96
I
740-674
9.
COST
PROJECT
I
TITLE
14. PROJECT
I
IFITNESS
CENTER
PROJECT
NUMBER
18. PROJECT
PTFL963002
ESTIMATES
IFITNESS
CENTER
ISUPPORTING
FACILITIES
1 UTILITIES
1 PAVEMENTS
SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
I DEMOLITION
SUPPORT
I COMMUNICATIONS
I
I
I
UNIT
1 COST
COST ( ($000)
1,518(
7,211
1
1
(
I
1
I
I
ILS I
ILS I
1SUBTOTAL
ITOTAL CONTRACT COST
OVERHEAD
(5.7%)
1
I
9,772
IV/MI' QUANTITY
ISM I 4,750
ITEM
AND
COST($OOO)
I
I
/SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
ITOTAL
REQUEST
ITOTAL
REQUEST
(ROUNDED)
DATE
generated)
I
I
DATA
ILS
ISM
ILS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
/
(
1
)
(
(
901 (
3,870
I
2,034
)
I
640) 1
320) 1
416))
348) 1
9,245
1
527
9,772
9,772
1
1
1
I
Description
of Proposed Construction:
Two-story
facility
with
Istructural
steel
frame, brick
exterior
walls,
sloped roof system,
indoor
Irunning
track,
gymnasium,
racquetball
courts,
specialized
flooring,
[mechanical/electrical/fire
protection
and detection/communications
systems
land other necessary
support.
Demolish one facility
(3,870 SM) .
IAir
Conditioning:
150 KW.
110.
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
4,750 SM ADEQUATE:
0 SUBSTANDARD:
IPROJECT:
Fitness
Center.
(Current
Mission)
[REQUIREMENT:
An adequately
sized and properly
configured
3,870
SM
facility
is
[required
for the daily
training
and exercise
for the base population.
ISpace is required
for basketball,
volleyball,
racquetball,
and handball
Icourts,
an indoor
running
track,
weight
room, and men's and women's locker
land shower rooms.
This project
also includes
space for the wellness
(center
for a one-stop
shopping approach for health,
wellness,
and fitness.
(CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing
facility
is not large
enough to
Iaccommodate all
the programs necessary
to maintain
a well-balanced
Ioffering
of aerobic
and anaerobic
activities
as well as individual
and
lteam sports.
The center
must currently
accommodate 24 programs but the
Iexisting
space is not configured
to handle additional
needed activity
/space.
Overcrowding
has become a problem despite
18-hour
operations
to
Imeet the needs of flightline
personnel
and air crews supporting
the KC-10
land mobility
mission.
The expanded demand for circuit
training
has forced
(the staff
to use the badly needed court
space in the main gymnasium for
(circuit
training
equipment
(universal,
nautilus,
resistance
training,
/stationary
cycles,
etc.),
resulting
in damage to the existing
court
space.
IExisting
materials
and finishes,
due to constant
usage of the facility,
DD FORM 1391,
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
I
Page No 168
/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
)
I
I
s
11.
I
COMPONENT\
/AIR
FORCE
INSTALLATION
DATE
12.
FY 2001
I
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
PROJECT
DATA
I
generated)
AND LOCATION
13.
I
IMCGUIRE
AIR FORCE BASE,
NEW JERSEY
TITLE
14. PROJECT
(5.
PROJECT
NUMEkER
I
FITNESS
PTFL963002
CENTER
lhave degraded
areas.
and in some cases
caused
safety
hazards
in physical
training
The sports
and physical
fitness
center
will
not
Ibe able to provide
adequate services
to base personnel
that depend on this
Ifacility
for sports and physical
fitness
activities
required
to support
Imilitary
duty and a healthy
life
style.
This will
result
in degraded
Imorale and mission effectiveness.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets the criteria/scope
specified
in Air Force
IHandbook 32-1084,
"Facility
Requirements."
This project
also meets the
Icriteria/scope
specified
in the AMC "Guide to Excellent
Services
/Facilities."
An economic analysis
has been prepared
comparing
alternatives
[of new construction,
addition/alteration,
and status
quo.
New
Iconstruction
was found to be the most cost-effective
over the life
of the
[project.
BASE CIVIL ENGINEER:
Lt Co1 Seb Romano, (609) 724-3033.
[Fitness
Center:
4,750 SM = 51,130 SF
IIMPACT
DD FORM
IF
NOT
1391C,
(
I
PROVIDED:
DEC
76
Previous
editions
are obsolete.
I
I
I
I
/
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
11.
12.
I
COMPONENT\
I
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
IAIR FORCE
(3. INSTALLATION
I
(MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
[FITNESS
CENTER
I
112.
I a
PROJECT
DATA
DATE
I
NEw JERSEY
15.
I
PROJECT
NUMBER
)
I
PTFL963002
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design Data:
Design, Bid, Build
I
(1)
(2)
I
Status:
Date Design Started
(a)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
lb)
* (c) Percent Complete as of Jan 2000
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
Date Design Complete
(e)
(f)
Energy Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
Basis:
(a)
Standard
or Definitive
(b)
Where Design Was Most
99 JAN 26 1
15%
00 JAN 30
00 SEP 10
Y
be performed
Design
Recently
NO
N/A
Used -
I
($000) I
Total
Cost (c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans and Specifications
(a)
(b)
All Other Design Costs
(c)
Total
(d)
Contract
(e)
In-house
@a) Construction Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
Construction
)
1
)
I
I
(3)
(5)
y I
costs
612 1
306
918
765
153
01 APR
01 MAY
Completion
02 MAY
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
with Parametric
Cost Estimate
which is comparable
to traditional
35% design
to ensure valid
scope and cost and executability.
Equipment associated
with
Dther appropriations:
N/A
b.
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
this
Previous
project
editions
will
are
be provided
obsolete.
from
Page No
170
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
PROGRAM
12.
I
DATE
14. COMMAND
15. AREA CONSTI
IAIR MOBILITY
I COST INDEX1
I
0.88
COMMAND
IPOPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA
1 SUPPORTED
16. PERSONNEL
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 OFF] ENL 1 CIV
OFF1 ENL [CIVl
OFF1 ENL ICIVl
TOTAL
STRENGTH
I
) 571
1901 801
5,6251
la* As of 30 SEP 99
1 6671 43131
3181
1
1
3121
1 571
1901 801
5,574
lb. End FY 2005
1 6681 42671
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total
Acreage:
(
1,875)
Ialb. Inventory
Total
As Of:
(30 SEP 99)
5,571,909
0
Authorization
Not
Yet
In
Inventory:
Ic*
24,570
Id. Authorization
Requested In This Program:
Included
In Following
Program:
(FY 2002)
17,215
le. Authorization
If. Planned In Next Three Program Years:
4,900
lg. Remaining Deficiency:
86,800
Ih. Grand Total:
5,705,394
PROJECTS
REQUESTED
IN
THIS
PROGRAM:
FY
2001
18.
ICATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
START
($000)
I- CODE
~
-CMPL
I
AND LOCATION
DANGEROUS CARGO PADS
1116-662
19a.
Future
Projects:
Included
in
1211-159
C-130 CORROSION CONTROL
FACILITY
I
the
LS 24,570
JAN 99
TOTAL :
24,570
Following
Program (FY 2002)
6,500 SM 17,215
SEP 00
t
17,215
TOTAL:
(9b.
Future
Projects:
Typical
Planned Next Three Years:
DORMITORY
1721-312
96 RM
4,900
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
An airlift
wing with two C-130
Isquadrons;
a fighter
operations
group with two A/OA-10 squadrons;
and two
IAFSOC squadrons,
an air support
operations
group,
and the USAF Combat
IControl
School.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
I
/
112.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog
This
0
0
0
0
E:
DD FORM 1390,
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
Installation
are
obsolete.
:
I
/
33,437
Page No
:
171
(1. COMPONENT!
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT DATA
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
14. PROJECT TITLE
(2.
I
DATE
I
I
IDANGEROUS CARGO PADS
IPOPE AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH CAROLINA
PROGRAM
ELEMENT16.
CATEGORY
CODEI7.
PROJECT
NUMBER IS. PROJECT COST($OOO)
15.
I
I
I
I
24,570
) 4.18.96
116-662
TMK-Io13009
9. COST ESTIMATES
I
I
I
1 UNIT 1 COST
ITEM
COST
( ($000)
IV/MI< JUANTITY
1 14,459
IDANGEROUS CARGO PADS
ISM
I: 162,800
1101 (11,308)
CONCRETE APRON AND TAKIWAY
ISM /: 102,800
STRESSED ASPHALT APRON AND SHOULDERS
591 ( 1,947)
I='
1 33,000
411
( 1,107)
NON-STRESSED
ASPHALT SHOULDERS
ISM I 27,000
LIGHTING/MARSHALING/PARKING
AREA
311
(
97)
ISM 1 3,115
I 8,786
SUPPORTING
FACILITIES
UPGRADE PAVEMENTS TO SUPPORT K-LOADERS
LS
I ( 930)
UTILITIES
LS
1 ( 3,442)
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
LS
1 ( 3,128)
ENVIRONMENTAL
REMEDIATION
LS
1 ( 1,286)
SUBTOTAL
1
23,245
1
23,245
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION,
INSPECTION
AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
(
1,325
I
I
1
24,570
TOTAL REQUEST
1
24,570
ITOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
I
1
I
L
1
1
I
I
I
110.
Description
of Proposed
Construction:
Construct
dangerous
cargo
pads
)to include
aircraft
loading
and munitions
marshalling
area.
Construct
Iconnecting
taxiways,
asphalt
shoulders,
and install
airfield
pavement
/lighting
and marking,
environmental
remediation,
and supporting
utilities.
IDemolish
pavement
(24,000
SM).
Ill.
REQUIREMENT:
As required.
[PROJECT:
Construct
five
dangerous
cargo
pads.
(Current
Mission)
IREQUIREMENT:
Adequately
sized,
dangerous
cargo
pads,
located
within
the
/explosive
quantity/distance
zone,
are required
to support
loading
and
[unloading
of explosives
or other
dangerous
cargo.
These pads must be able
/to support
fully
loaded
military
and Civil
Reserve
Air
Fleet
(CRAF)
Iwide-bodied
large
frame
aircraft.
These pads are required
to support
US
ISOCOM, Joint
Chiefs
of Staff,
Joint
Special
Operations
Command, and 43 Air
IWing plans
for
the deployment
of the US Army 18th Airborne
Corps
and the
182nd Airborne
Division.
Hydrant
refueling
and isolator
valve
pits
Iconnected
to the existing
hydrant
refueling
system
are also
required
to
Isupport
quick
aircraft
turnaround.
Taxiways
are required
to provide
Jaircraft
access/egress.
/CURRENT SITUATION:
Hazardous
cargo
loading/unloading
is currently
/performed
on four
remote
taxiways.
These taxiways
are located
within
and
(violate
the 1,000
foot
safety
clearance
zone (from
the centerline
of the
[runway)
and explosive
quantity/distance
criteria.
Using
these
narrow
ltaxiways
for
dangerous
cargo
pads restricts
aircraft
maneuverability,
[restricts
and fragments
cargo
loading/unloading
operations
and presents
a
(constant
foreign
object
damage
(FOD) hazard
when either
C-5
or KC-10
laircraft
load/unload
dangerous
cargo.
The current
configuration
allows
[two
C-5 aircraft
to become trapped
in the area if one breaks
down or has
DD FORM 1391,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
Page
No
I
:
I
1
172
Il.
COMPONENT1
I
I
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
generated)
AND LOCATION
]AIR
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
I
IPOPE AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
DANGEROUS
PROJECT
DATA
12. DATE
I
I
h
NORTH CAROLINA
(5.
I
CARGO PADS
PROJECT
NUMBER 1
TMKH013009
This
requires
closing
the runway
until
the aircraft
can
Itrouble
loading.
Ibe towed
from the area.
IIMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If this
project
is not accomplished,
continued
Iadditional
sorties
will
continue
to be required
to meet major
theater
war
[deployment
requirements.
Closing
the runway
(due to removing
inoperable
laircraft
from one of the four
remote
taxiways)
would
make it impossible
to
Isupport
training
and contingency
operations
associated
with
both Pope
IAFB'S
and the Army's
wartime
mission.
IADDITIONAL:
This project
meets
the criteria/scope
specified
in the Air
IForce
Handbook
32-1084,
llCivil
Engineering
Facility
Requirements."
A
Ipreliminary
analysis
of reasonable
options
for accomplishing
this
project
1 (status
quo, renovation,
and new construction)
was done.
It indicates
new
Iconstruction
is the only option
that
will
satisfy
operational
[requirements.
Therefore,
a full
economic
anlaysis
was not performed.
IBASE CIVIL
ENGINEER:
Lt Co1 John Cawthorne,
(910)
394-2561
Concrete
Apron
land Taxiway:
102,800SM
= 1,106,53OSF;
Stressed
Asphalt
Apron
and
IShoulders:
33,OOOSM = 355,209SF;
Non-Stressed
Asphalt
and Shoulders:
3,115
SM =
127,OOOSM = 290,626SF;
Lighting/Marshalling/Parking
Area:
133,530
SF
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
Previous
editions
are
obsolete.
paw
No
)
I
1
I
)
I
1
I
I
173
11.
12. DATE
COMPONENT)
I
I
IAIR FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
FY 2001
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
qenerated)
AND LOCATION
POPE AIR FORCE BASE,
14. PROJECT TITLE
I
NORTH CAROLINA
15. PROJECT NUMBER
I
I
IDANGEROUS
I
112.
I a
(2)
(3)
TMKHo13009
CARGO PADS
SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
Estimated
Design
Data:
(1)
I
PROJECT DATA
__
Design, Bid, Build
Status:
Date Design
Started
(a)
Parametric
Cost Estimates
used to develop
(b)
Percent
Complete
as of Jan 2000
* (cl
Date 35% Designed.
*(d)
(e)
Date Design
Complete
Energy
Study/Life-Cycle
analysis
was/will
(f)
Basis:
Standard
or
(a)
(b)
Where Design
I
I
Definitive
Was Most
Design
Recently
99 JAN 26
Y
15%
99 AUG 30
00 SEP 15
NA
be performed
costs
NO
N/A
Used
-
I
($000) 1
Total
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Cost
(c) = (a) + (b) or (d) + (e):
Production
of Plans
and Specifications
All Other
Design
Costs
Total
Contract
In-house
(3a) (ekonstruction
Contract Award Date
Construction
Start
(4)
1560
780
2340
1950
390
01 FEB
01 MAR
1
)
1
1
1
1
I
I
(5)
Construction
Completion
03 MAR 1
* Indicates
completion
of Project
Definition
Cost Estimate
which
is comparable
to traditional
to ensure
valid
scope
and cost
and executability.
[other
I
Equipment
associated
appropriations:
DD FORM 1391C,
DEC 76
with
N/A
this
Previous
project
editions
will
with
Parametric
35% design
be provided
are
obsolete.
from
Page No 174
Il.
12.
COMPONENT/
I
FORCE
13. INSTALLATION
(WRIGHT-PATTERSON
IAIR
FORCE BASE,
16. PERSONNEL
STRENGTH
I
FY 2001
I
IAIR
MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION
(computer
AND
LOCATION
PROGRAM
la. As of 30 SEP 99
14. COMMAND
ib.
End FY 2005
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
: 8.
(30 SEP 99)
Authorization
Not Yet In Inventory:
Authorization
Requested In This Program:
Authorization
Included
In Following
Program:
Planned In Next Three Program Years:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM: FY 2001
I 113-321
1
9a.
311-173
PROJECT
TITLE
Future
Projects:
ACQUISITION
Included
in
MANAGEMENT
0
(FY 2002)
t
COST
($000)
DESIGN
~START
STATUS
CMPL
-
the
Following
8,500
22,600
TURN KEY
22,600
Program (FY 2002)
SM
TOTAL:
Future
Projects:
1310-921
CONSOLIDATED
Typical
TOXIC
Planned
Next
HAZARDS
Three
5,600
LABORATORY
DORMITORY
1721-312
22,600
19,500
26,015
150,500
1,216,080
144
19,500
Years:
SM 14,200
RM
TURN KEY
9,200
1851-147
BASE ENTRANCE (GATE 1B)
LS
2,615
110.
Mission
or Major Functions:
AFMC Headquarters
which is responsible
lfor
direction
of research,
acquisition
and logistics
support
for air and
lspace weapons systems and related
components;
Aeronautical
Systems Center;
IAir Force Research Laboratories;
Air Force Institute
of Technology;
Air
/Force Museum; National
Aerospace
Intelligence
Center;
Air Force Reserve
Iwing with two C-141 airlift
squadrons;
and an AMC flight
with one C-21
Jlogistics
group.
Ill.
Outstanding
pollution
and safety
(OSHA) deficiencies:
/
112.
I
a.
b.
Air pollution:
Water pollution:
C.
Occupational
safety
and health:
d.
Other Environmental:
Real Property
Maintenance
Backlog This
DD FORM 1390,
i
19,500
PH-4B
19b.
I
AREA CONSTI
LS
TOTAL:
COMPLEX,
(5.
997,465
SCOPE
REPLACE WEST RAMP, PHASE I
I
I
generated)
(AIR FORCE
I COST INDEX1
0.97
1
IMATERIEL
COMMAND
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
1 SUPPORTED
I
1 OFF]
ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL [CIVl
OFF]
ENL ]CIVl
TOTAL
)
20,8311
51
I
1 811 13811691
129141 27841107401
19,884
27131101381
I81i
13811691
'
126451
7. INVENTORY
DATA ($000)
OHIO
CATEGORY
CODE
DATE
1 DEC 76
Previous
editions
5,800
0
0
Installation
are
obsolete.
11,500
45,863
Page No 175
I