Jefferson through the Era of Good Feelings

advertisement
Jeffersonian Republicanism

AntifederalistsDemocratic-RepublicansRepublicans

Ideology:



Wanted a democratic government—power in the hands of the
people
Did not want all white males to vote, only the educated, but
they thought any person could be educated (contrast with the
Federalists)
Glorified the independent yeoman farmer




Thought cities/industry made people dependent on others
Classical liberals—as little government involvement as
possible in order to prevent chaos/anarchy
More power for the states, less for the federal govt (states
rights)
Very narrow interpretation of the Constitution
Republican Voters and Policies

Who would be a Republican?



Farmers/farming interests—South and the Westnew region
Generally the poor/middle class, but also wealthy people in
the South
Republican Policies






Strict construction of Constitution

No national bank

Limited role for federal govt—no funding of roads for example
No standing army, small navy
Low tariffs
Friendship with France
No alien or sedition acts
No excise taxes on whiskey
Compare and Contrast: Republican vs
Federalist
Republican
Federalist
South and West
New England, northern parts of the
Middle States
Farmers, rural areas
Merchants, factory owners, cities
Poor/middle class
Middle class and upper class
Friendship with France
Friendship with Britain
Narrow interpretation of Const.
Broad Interpretation of Const.
No bank
Yes bank
No standing army, small navy
Standing army, larger navy
States rights
National government power
Revolution of 1800

Jefferson wins a close election: defeats Adams 73-65


Aaron Burr vice president
Why a revolution?



No blood or violence
Major change in the philosophies of the governing party
Also, 1st peaceful exchange of power between 2 rival
administrations

1st President to be inaugurated in Washington D.C. (1801)

After 1801 the Republicans controlled the Presidency, the
House of Representatives, and the Senate, but not the
federal courts, why?

Judiciary Act of 1801—Federalists “packed” the courts
Jefferson’s Policies: Really a
Revolution?

No wholesale reversal of Federalist policies



What stayed?




Jefferson realized he had a divided country, didn’t want to totally
alienate New England/other Federalist areas
Federalist policies (debt payment, tariffs, etc) were pretty
effective
Hamilton’s tariffs, and debt repayment policies
Most federalists who worked for the government
The national bank
What got reversed?





Judiciary Act of 1801
Idea of a “permanent debt” to secure the loyalty of the wealthy
Excise Tax on Whiskey
Alien and Sedition Acts
Army pretty much eliminated, navy reduced in size
Jefferson’s 1st Term: 1800-1804

Largely successful

Barbary Pirates War 1801-1805



Louisiana Purchase 1803





US refused to pay additional bribe to Barbary Pirates
Jefferson sent Navy/Marines to attack Tripoli
Western half of Louisiana Territory given to Spain after French
and Indian War
Given from Spain to France during Napoleonic conquest of Spain
early 1800s
France at first tried to colonize it again, gave up, sold land to US
for $15 million
Lewis and Clark 1803-1805
Problems with the purchase


Where in the Constitution does it say President or Congress has
the power to buy land and add it to the United States?
People in New England not happy, why?
The Courts and Jefferson: Marbury v.
Madison and the Aaron Burr Trial

Marbury v. Madison 1803—Judicial Review







Judiciary Act of 1801 and the “Midnight Appointments”
Marbury had his commission signed by Adams, but it was never
sealed and delivered by the Sec. of State
Madison (Jefferson’s new Sec. of State) found the commission but
refused to deliver it
Marbury sued Madison in the Supreme Court to force him to
deliver the commission (writ of mandamus)
Court dominated by Federalists—Chief Justice=John Marshall
Marbury deserved his commission, but the law that allowed him
to sue Madison in the Supreme Court violated the Constitution—
a law that violated the Constitution was not valid—it was voided
by the Court=Judicial Review
Aaron Burr Trial


Tried to set up his own country in the southwest, arrested
During trial there weren’t two people who witnessed Burr
commit an act of treason—found not guilty by the courts—a very
strict interpretation of what treason was (high hurdle had to be
cleared)
Jefferson’s 2nd Term: 1804-1808

Jefferson won reelection easily in 1804

2nd term dominated by problems with France and Britain

Background: Napoleonic Wars


France and Britain at war, each wanted to stop trade with the
other, began to stop and seize US ships in the Atlantic Ocean
British began to impress US sailors—Chesapeake incident

Jefferson’s problem: can’t go to war with France and/or Britain,
but need to make them stop

Solution: Embargo Act 1807





All trade between the US and Europe prohibited
Who was this designed to hurt?
Who would be upset with this in the US?
Unsuccessful: hurt the US more than Britain or France
Repealed in 1809 just before Jefferson left office
War of 1812

James Madison (Jefferson’s Sec. of State, author of Const.) elected
President in 1808

Problems with France/Britain seizing US ships remained

Embargo Act replaced with:



Other problems:




Non-Intercourse Act—no US trade with just Britain or France
Macon’s Bill Number 2—whichever country dropped its trade
restrictions first the US would legalize trade only with that country
British supplying Indians with money/weapons in Canada
Impressment of US sailors by the British
US settlers in the West wanted to take over British Canada (War Hawks)
French repealed their trade restrictions Britain didn’t* US declared
War on Britain in 1812 (1812-1814)
War of 1812: Problems

US not prepared for war





Army had been slashed by Republicans—only 6,700 men
Navy well trained but only had 16 ocean-going ships
Finances not good

No more excise taxes

Embargo act had cut off trade so little revenue coming in
through tariffs

No national bank (charter had expired in 1811 and was not
renewed by the Republican Congress)

Major banks in New England/Northeast controlled by
Federalists who opposed the war and were reluctant to lend to
the government
Very little US industry—Republicans had stressed farming—
made it hard to produce wartime goods
No good roads to transport men/supplies around the country
War of 1812

Some early successes at Sea—USS Constitution defeated the
Guerriere

War went badly for the Americans especially at first




Some American successes




Invasion of Canada a disastrous failure
British blockade prevented US trade with foreign countries
British took over Detroit, Chicago, large parts of the Northwest,
and captured and burned Washington DC
Battle of Lake Erie, Battle of Lake Champlain, Battle of Fort
McHenry (Baltimore, Star Spangled Banner)
Battle of the Thames (in Canada) Indian leader Tecumseh killed
Battle of New Orleans (1815)—Andrew Jackson defeated the
British, saved the city
Treaty of Ghent Christmas Eve 1814—War over “status quo ante
bellum”—nothing resolved
Hartford Convention: the end of the
Federalist Party

Federalists upset with the war, upset with 16 years of Republican
rule

Met in Hartford 1814-1815 came up with a list of Constitutional
Amendments that they wanted enacted:





2/3rds vote in Congress to declare war, or admit new states
Elimination of the 3/5ths clause (slaves wouldn’t count at all)
1 term maximum for Presidents
No back to back Presidents from the same state
No more trade embargoes

If their demands weren’t met. . . . . secession?? During war time?

Came to Washington with their demands January of 1815


What two events did they hear about when they got there?
Hartford Convention mad the Federalists look like traitors, party
lost a lot of support, died out soon thereafter
Significance of the War of 1812

Increase in American nationalism—”We beat the British
again!”

Andrew Jackson became a hero—soon would become
President (1828)

Federalist Party on the way out (Hartford Convention)

Republican Party/Madison had become “federalized” began
to support:





A new national bank
A standing army and navy
Tariffs to protect US industries
Federal financing of roads and canals to ease transportation
Was really only 1 political party—the Republicans
Era of Good Feelings: 1816-1824

Period of time after the War of 1812 during James Monroe’s
Presidency when there was an increase in nationalism and
essentially only one functioning political party—Republican

Nationalism in domestic policy: the American System




Promote economic growth—a 2nd national bank (Bank of the
United States) 1816-1836
Protect US industries that had emerged during the War—
higher protective tariffs
Help urge westward expansion and promote economic
activity inside the United States—build roads and canals using
federal govt money—internal improvements
Nationalism in foreign policy




Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819—treaty between US and Spain
Joint occupation of Oregon with Britain 1818
Monroe Doctrine 1823
Peaceful resolution of US-Canada (Britain) border
Nationalism in the Courts: John
Marshall

Supreme Court, led by John Marshall decided a number of
cases during the Era of Good Feelings which helped to
increase the power of the federal government and
established a broad interpretation of the Constitution

Dartmouth College v. Woodward 1819—court ruled that
contracts between the state and private individuals could
not be undone by the state, even if a majority of people
wanted that

McCulloch v. Maryland 1819—national bank ruled
constitutional, broad interpretation of necessary and proper
clause

Gibbons v. Ogden 1824—the national government was
supreme in regulating interstate and international commerce
not the states
Problems under the Surface

Sectional differences beginning to emerge







Different sections had competing interests one section’s gain was
another’s loss
North, South, West
National Bank—North liked, South/West hated
Tariffs—North liked, West split, South hated
Internal improvements—North liked, West liked, South hated
Slavery—North hated, West split, South in favor
Missouri Compromise (Compromise of 1820) 1820






Missouri wanted to join US as a slave state
This would upset the free-slave balance in the Senate
No other territory was ready to be admitted
Also, Missouri=the first new state completely inside the Louisiana
Purchase territory—what precedent would that set?
Missouri admitted as slave state, Maine broken off from Mass.
admitted as free state
Line drawn across Missouri’s southern border—no slavery above
that line in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase (except for
Missouri)
Download