Slides prepared by John Loucks ã 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 11 Chapter 5, Part B Facility Layout: Manufacturing and Services 2 Overview Facility Layout Manufacturing Facility Layouts Analyzing Manufacturing Facility Layouts Service Facility Layouts Wrap-Up: What World-Class Companies Do 3 Facility Layout Facility layout means planning: for the location of all machines, utilities, employee workstations, customer service areas, material storage areas, aisles, restrooms, lunchrooms, internal walls, offices, and computer rooms for the flow patterns of materials and people around, into, and within buildings 4 Locate All Areas In and Around Buildings Equipment Work stations Material storage Rest/break areas Utilities Eating areas Aisles Offices 5 Characteristics of the Facility Layout Decision Location of these various areas impacts the flow through the system. The layout can affect productivity and costs generated by the system. Layout alternatives are limited by the amount and type of space required for the various areas the amount and type of space available the operations strategy . . . more 6 Characteristics of the Facility Layout Decision Layout decisions tend to be: Infrequent Expensive to implement Studied and evaluated extensively Long-term commitments 7 Manufacturing Facility Layouts 8 Materials Handling The central focus of most manufacturing layouts is to minimize the cost of processing, transporting, and storing materials throughout the production system. Materials used in manufacturing include: Raw material Purchased components Work-in-progress Finished goods Packaging material Maintenance, repair, and operating supplies 9 Materials Handling A materials-handling system is the entire network of transportation that: Receives material Stores material in inventories Moves material between processing points Deposits the finished products into vehicles for delivery to customers 10 Materials Handling Material-Handling Principles Move directly (no zigzagging/backtracking) Minimize human effort required Move heavy/bulky items the shortest distances Minimize number of times same item is moved MH systems should be flexible Mobile equipment should carry full loads 11 Materials Handling Material-Handling Equipment Automatic transfer devices Containers/pallets/hand carts Conveyors Cranes Elevators Pipelines Turntables AGVS 12 Basic Layout Forms Process Product Cellular Fixed-Position Hybrid 13 Process (Job Shop) Layouts Equipment that perform similar processes are grouped together Used when the operations system must handle a wide variety of products in relatively small volumes (i.e., flexibility is necessary) 14 Characteristics of Process Layouts General-purpose equipment is used Changeover is rapid Material flow is intermittent Material handling equipment is flexible Operators are highly skilled . . . more 15 Characteristics of Process Layouts Technical supervision is required Planning, scheduling and controlling functions are challenging Production time is relatively long In-process inventory is relatively high 16 Product (Assembly Line) Layouts Operations are arranged in the sequence required to make the product Used when the operations system must handle a narrow variety of products in relatively high volumes Operations and personnel are dedicated to producing one or a small number of products 17 Characteristics of Product Layouts Special-purpose equipment are used Changeover is expensive and lengthy Material flow approaches continuous Material handling equipment is fixed Operators need not be as skilled . . . more 18 Characteristics of Product Layouts Little direct supervision is required Planning, scheduling and controlling functions are relatively straight-forward Production time for a unit is relatively short In-process inventory is relatively low 19 Cellular Manufacturing Layouts Operations required to produce a particular family (group) of parts are arranged in the sequence required to make that family Used when the operations system must handle a moderate variety of products in moderate volumes 20 Characteristics of Cellular Manufacturing Relative to Process Layouts Equipment can be less general-purpose Material handling costs are reduced Training periods for operators are shortened In-process inventory is lower Parts can be made faster and shipped more quickly 21 Characteristics of Cellular Manufacturing Relative to Product Layouts Equipment can be less special-purpose Changeovers are simplified Production is easier to automate 22 Fixed-Position Layouts Product remains in a fixed position, and the personnel, material and equipment come to it Used when the product is very bulky, large, heavy or fragile 23 Hybrid Layouts Actually, most manufacturing facilities use a combination of layout types. An example of a hybrid layout is where departments are arranged according to the types of processes but the products flow through on a product layout. 24 New Trends in Manufacturing Layouts Designed for quality Designed for flexibility - to quickly shift to different product models or to different production rates Cellular layout within larger process layouts Automated material handling U-shaped production lines . . . more 25 New Trends in Manufacturing Layouts More open work areas with fewer walls, partitions, or other obstacles Smaller and more compact factory layouts Less space provided for storage of inventories throughout the layout 26 Planning Manufacturing Facility Layouts Two Categories of Software Tools Computer aided design (CAD) Allows 3-D, full-color views of facility design Allows virtual walk-throughs Ex. – ArchiCAD, AutoSketch, AutoCAD Computer simulation Can simulate proposed system layout in operation and measure its performance Ex. – ProModel, VisFactory, SIMPROCESS 27 Planning Manufacturing Facility Layouts Process and Warehouse Layouts Product Layouts Cellular Manufacturing Layouts 28 Planning Manufacturing Facility Layouts Process Layouts Primary focus is on the efficient flow of materials The wide variety of potential product routings through the facility can be evaluated using computer simulation Warehouse Layouts Primary focus is the fast storage and retrieval of inventory items Decisions about aisle size/placement and location of each inventory item can be evaluated using computer simulation 29 Planning Manufacturing Facility Layouts Product Layouts Primary focus is on the analysis of production lines The goal of the production line analysis is to: Determine how many workstations to have Determine which tasks to assign to which workstation Minimize the number of workers & machines used Provide the required amount of capacity Line balancing is a key part of the analysis 30 Planning Product Layouts Line Balancing Procedure 1. Determine the tasks involved in completing 1 unit 2. Determine the order in which tasks must be done 3. Draw a precedence diagram 4. Estimate task times 5. Calculate the cycle time 6. Calculate the minimum number of workstations 7. Use a heuristic to assign tasks to workstations 31 Planning Product Layouts Line Balancing Heuristics Heuristic methods, based on simple rules, have been developed to provide good (not optimal) solutions to line balancing problems Heuristic methods include: Incremental utilization (IU) method Longest-task-time (LTT) method … and many others 32 Planning Product Layouts Incremental Utilization Method Add tasks to a workstation in order of task precedence one at a time until utilization is 100% or is observed to fall Then the above procedure is repeated at the next workstation for the remaining tasks Pro – Appropriate when one or more task times is equal to or greater than the cycle time Con – Might create the need for extra equipment 33 Planning Product Layouts Longest-Task-Time Method Adds tasks to a workstation one at a time in the order of task precedence. If two or more tasks tie for order of precedence, the one with the longest task time is added Conditions for its use: No task time can be greater than the cycle time There can be no duplicate workstations 34 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing Armstrong produces bicycle tire pumps on a production line. The time to perform the 6 tasks in producing a pump and their immediate predecessor tasks are shown on the next slide. Ten pumps per hour must be produced and 45 minutes per hour are productive. Use the incremental utilization heuristic to combine the tasks into workstations in order to minimize idle time. 35 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing Task A B C D E F Tasks that Immediately Precede -A -B,C D E Time to Perform Task (min.) 5.4 3.2 1.5 2.8 17.1 12.8 Total = 42.8 36 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing – Network (Precedence) Diagram A B D E F C 37 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing – Cycle Time Productive Time per Hour Cycle Time = Demand per Hour = 45/10 = 4.5 minutes per pump 38 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing – Minimum Number of Workstations Minimum (Total Task Time)(Demand per Hour) Number of = Productive Time per Hour Workstations = [(42.8)(10)]/45 = 9.51 workstations 39 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing – Incremental Utilization Heuristic WS Tasks Mins./pump #WS’s Incr.Util. 1 A 5.4 5.4/4.5=1.2= 2 60.0% 1 A,B 5.4 + 3.2 8.6/4.5=1.9= 2 95.0% 1 A,B,C 8.6 + 1.5 10.1/4.5=2.2= 3 49.8% 2 C 1.5 1.5/4.5=.33= 1 33.3% 2 C,D 1.5 + 2.8 4.3/4.5=.96= 1 95.6% 2 C,D,E 4.3 + 17.1 21.4/4.5=4.8= 5 95.1% 3 E 17.1 17.1/4.5=3.8= 4 95.0% 3 E,F 17.1 + 12.8 29.9/4.5=6.6= 7 94.9% 4 F 12.8 12.8/4.5=2.8= 3 94.8% 40 Example: Armstrong Pumps Line Balancing – Utilization of Production Line Minimum Number of Workstations Utilization = Actual Number of Workstations = 9.51/10 = .951 = 95.1% 41 Planning Product Layouts Rebalancing a Production Line Changes that can lead to production lines being out of balance or having insufficient/excess capacity are: Changes in demand Machine modifications Variations in employee learning and training 42 Planning Cellular Manufacturing Layouts Cell Formation Decision Which machines are assigned to manufacturing cells Which parts will be produced in each cell 43 Planning Cellular Manufacturing Layouts Fundamental Requirements for Parts to be Made in Cells Demand for the parts must be high enough and stable enough that moderate batch sizes of the parts can be produced periodically. Parts must be capable of being grouped into parts families. 44 Planning Cellular Manufacturing Layouts More-Complex Issues to be Resolved If all the parts cannot be cleanly divided between cells, how will we decide which are to be the exceptional parts? If inadequate capacity is available to produce all the parts in cells, which parts should be made outside the cells? 45 Planning Cellular Manufacturing Layouts Cell Formation Procedure 1. Form the Parts-Machines Matrix. 2. Rearrange the Rows. Place the machines that produce the same parts in adjacent rows. 3. Rearrange the Columns. Place the parts requiring the same machines in adjacent columns. 4. Use the rearranged parts-machines matrix to identify cells, the machines for that cell and the parts that will be produced in that cell. 46 Example: Maxx Superchargers Cell Formulation Maxx produces superchargers for high performance cars and trucks. Maxx has implemented a group technology program in its shop and now must formulate the manufacturing cells. Maxx has identified six parts that meet the requirements for CM. The parts-machines matrix on the next slide identifies the 6 parts and 5 machines on which the parts are presently produced. 47 Example: Maxx Superchargers Cell Formulation – Original Matrix Parts Machines A B C D E 1 2 X X X X X 3 X 4 X 5 X X 6 X X X X X 48 Example: Maxx Superchargers Cell Formulation – Rows Rearranged Parts Machines A E D C B 1 2 X X X X X 3 X X 4 5 X X 6 X X X X X 49 Example: Maxx Superchargers Cell Formulation – Columns Rearranged Parts Machines A E D C B 3 X X 5 X X 6* X X X 1 2 4 X X X X X X X * exceptional part 50 Example: Maxx Superchargers Cell Formulation – Summary 2 manufacturing cells (MC1, MC2) will be used. Parts 3 and 5 will be produced in MC1 on machines A and E. Parts 1, 2 and 4 will be produced in MC2 on machines B, C and D. Part 6 is an exceptional part that cannot be produced within a single cell. 51 Service Facility Layouts 52 Characteristics of Services There may be a diversity of services provided There are three dimensions to the type of service: Standard or custom design Amount of customer contact Mix of physical goods and intangible services There are three types of service operations: Quasi manufacturing Customer-as-participant Customer-as-product 53 Characteristics of Service Facility Layouts The encounter between the customer and the service must be provided for. The degree to which customer-related features must be provided varies with the amount of customer involvement and customer contact. 54 Planning Service Facility Layouts Quasi-Manufacturing Services Several topics previously discussed under Manufacturing Layouts are relevant here: Principles of material handling CAD and simulation software Line balancing 55 Planning Service Facility Layouts Customer-as-Participant & Customer-as-Product An important element is providing for customer waiting lines Amount of space needed for service counters and waiting customers Placement of waiting lines in overall layout 56 Planning Service Facility Layouts For many service operations, layouts are like process layouts in manufacturing The departments of hospitals are grouped and located according to their processes In some cases, closeness ratings are used to reflect the desirability of having one department near another 57 Using Closeness Ratings to Develop Service Facility Layouts Start Let m = 1 and n = 6. Step 1 Identify dept. pairs with CR of m. Step 2 Develop layout with dept. pairs idenStep 3 tified in Step 2 adjacent to one another. Let m = m + 1 and n = n - 1. No Does m = 3 and n = 4 ? Yes Stop Identify dept. pairs with CR of n. Step 4 Fit the dept. pairs identified in Step 4 into the trial layout from Step 3. Step 5 Examine the trial layout from Step 5. If any CRs of dept. pairs are violated, rearrange depts. to comply with CRs. Step 6 58 Using Closeness Ratings to Develop Service Facility Layouts Typical Closeness Ratings Closeness Rating 1 2 3 4 5 6 Meaning of Rating Necessary Very Important Important Slightly Important Unimportant Undesirable 59 Example: AG Advertising Using Closeness Ratings AG Advertising is moving into a new office suite having seven large, roughly equal size rooms, one for each department of the firm. Lisa, the manager, must now assign each department to a room. She has developed a grid of closeness ratings (on the next slide) for the 21 unique pairs of departments. 60 Example: AG Advertising Closeness Ratings Grid Dept. A Dept. B Dept. C Dept. D Dept. E Dept. F Dept. G 5 6 4 4 2 2 1 4 5 3 6 3 5 2 1 1 4 3 6 2 3 61 Example: AG Advertising Unassigned Rooms of Office Suite 62 Example: AG Advertising Layout Satisfying All Pairings of Departments with 1 Closeness Ratings CR = 1 B–D B–F C–G B D F C G 63 Example: AG Advertising Trying to satisfying all pairings of departments with 6 closeness ratings, we see that Dept. C needs to be moved. CR = 1 B–D B–F C–G B F D G C CR = 6 A–D B–C 64 Example: AG Advertising Layout Satisfying All Pairings of Departments with 6 Closeness Ratings (note that we swapped Dept. D and Dept. F) CR = 1 B–D B–F C–G B F A D E G C CR = 6 A–D B–C 65 Wrap-Up: World-Class Practice Strive for flexibility in layouts Multi-job training of workers Sophisticated preventive-maintenance programs Flexible machines Empowered workers trained in problem solving Layouts small and compact Services follow the above practices plus incorporate customer needs in design 66 End of Chapter 5, Part B 67