Language and Culture Tuesdays and Thursdays, 1-2:20 pm David Price, Olivia Archibald, and Irina Gendelman SOC 103 SOC 395 ENG 317 IDS 301 Syllabus, Fall 2011 David Price Office: OM 309, phone 438-4295 Office Hours: MWF 1:15-3 pm, and by arrangement. dprice@stmartin.edu Olivia Archibald Office: OM 211, phone 438-4357 Office Hours: T 2:30-5pm; TH 2:30-5pm;; and by arrangement. oarchibald@stmartin.edu Irina Gendelman Office: O’Grady Library Study Room 2, phone: 360-486-8826 Office Hours: T and Th 3-4 pm; and by arrangement. igendelman@stmartin.edu Teaching Assistant for the class -- Kayleen Kondrack Kayleen.Kondrack@stmartin.edu Course Description In this class we combine linguistic and anthropological perspectives to examine the intersections of language, culture and meaning. Human culture is larger than language, yet language and culture are indelibly linked. For nearly a century and a half anthropologists have recognized that culture is comprised of learned beliefs and behaviors shared among human groups. Clearly language is key vehicle for the transmission and creation of culture, yet it is a vehicle that we use (or perhaps occasionally uses us) with little conscious awareness of its power and limits. Our study of language in this course is based on the assumption that language has “material,” tangible effects. As David Bleich has noted, “we are not ‘minds’ relating to other minds, but people relating to one another and to society.” Language – public language -- is not just abstract sounds that we can tear apart to see where the tongue is when we say certain vowels or consonants, not just abstract words to discern what grammatical function they have in the sentence. The effects of language spoken or written affect our “bodies,” our minds….the material/physical conditions of our lives. One example of this effect is how governing systems have prevented marginal peoples (slaves, people of color, people isolated geographically, immigrants, people with “substandard” dialects, women…) from attaining the status of “literacy” via laws that exclude certain groups from learning, privilege the dialect/language of those in power, and/or even define and privilege what (and who) is “literate” and what counts for “knowledge.” For this reason, our course emphasizes the ability of language and nonverbal communication to shape our perceptions and the ways that language is constrained by culture. For this reason, we examine language around such issues as identity, power, diversity, orality, ethnicity/race, gender, and social class. We view this academic enterprise as a cooperative venture in the most literal sense of the phrase. We (the instructors) anticipate learning from each other, and from you the students as we explore language and culture. Alongside our typical foci on general aspects of language and culture, this semester’s course will spotlight the language and culture of prisons. We will use diverse readings, fieldwork and writing exercises, lectures, guest speakers and fieldtrips as part of our exploration of course theme and readings. If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of a disability, if you have medical and/or safety concerns to share with me, or if you need special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please make an appointment with one of us as-soon-as possible. 1 Goals and Objectives Language and Culture is designed: 1. To critically examine the forces of language and culture, including how language and culture shape our beliefs about ourselves and others. 2. To enhance an understanding and appreciation of languages and cultures, ours and others. 3. To transfer the abilities and skills learned in this course to other areas of life, both academic and nonacademic. By the end of this course, students will be able to: 1. Define in complex ways the questions “What is culture?” and “What is language?” 2. Explain the relationship of language and culture to power, control, gender, socio-economic class, and ethnicity/race. 3. Explain the connections of the language and culture of poverty to power, control, gender, socio-economic class, and ethnicity/race. 4. Demonstrate an awareness of cultural distinctions and dialect, and the role they play in perceptions of oneself and others. 5. Demonstrate the ability to generate and articulate personal responses to course texts and to explain the premises and assumptions underlying these personal responses. 6. Demonstrate the ability to synthesize course concepts. 7. Demonstrate the ability to use basic ethnographic fieldwork techniques. Expectations 1. Class Preparation. You should come to class with assignments carefully read and be prepared to engage yourself in all class activities. 2. Due Dates. You are expected to honor all due dates. 3. Academic Honesty. All work must be original and, when needed, properly documented. This class abides with the college’s policy on plagiarism as detailed in the college’s Student Handbook and Price’s plagiarism FAQ webpage: http://homepages.stmartin.edu/fac_staff/dprice/fall97/plagiarism-FAQ.htm 4. Creative Participation. We expect you to bring your insights and questions to class with you and to help us make this course a cooperative learning experience for all of us. Course Texts (all available to rent or buy in the SMU Bookstore) Duneier, Mitchell. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, 2001. Durrow, Heidi. The Girl Who Fell from the Sky. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin, 2010. Walls, Jeannette. The Glass Castle. New York: Scribner, 2005. Optional Bourgois, Phillippe. In Search of Respect. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge, 2003. Articles/Essays, typically found in Moodle: “Serving in Florida,” chapter from Barbara Ehrenreich’s Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. 11-49. Barthes, Roland. Chapter from Mythologies, 1957. Cameron, Deborah. Chapter from Working with Spoken Discourse. London: SAGE, 2001. Daniels, Harvey A. “Nine Ideas About Language” Gendelman, Irina. “The Romantic and Dangerous Stranger” http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0607/03-gendelman.php Lakoff, George “The Policy-Speak Disaster for Health Care” Kephardt, Ron “Reading Creole English Does Not Destroy Your Brain Cells” Littleton, Greta “Spangorland: A Simulation for Language Policy” McCrum, Cran, and MacNeil “Scots-Irish Migrations” Miner, Horace “Body Ritual Among the Nacirema” (http://www.msu.edu/~jdowell/miner.html) Roberts, Paul “A Brief History of English” 2 Major Projects Project One: “I am” Project Due September 13 Project Two: Sidewalk Paper Due Oct 11 SOC 103 students – 5 pages in length; 300 level students – 7-8 pages Project Three: Field Ethnography Due Oct 25 Project Four: Paper on Glass Castle Due Nov. 22 SOC 103 students – 5 pages in length; 300 level students – 7-8 pages. Project Five: Synthesis of Course Concepts Paper. Due 1 pm, Tuesday, December 13. The final paper allows students to synthetically incorporate many of the themes and principles examined throughout the semester. Papers need to be six pages in length for SOC 103 students and at least eight pages in length for students taking the class as an upper division course. Among different material used in the paper, it should include the last book read, Durrow’s The Girl Who Fell From the Sky. The analytical perspective used in this paper is left to the writer, but the analysis should both incorporate specific points made in course readings and it should build a focused analysis that sheds critical light on the intersection of culture, poverty and language. This paper should begin with a clearly stated thesis. It should discuss some pertinent scholarly writings on this topic (though this is not a research paper, and this need not be a literature review or thorough discussion), and most importantly, it should build a critical analysis of a chosen aspect of the language and culture of poverty. This paper will be in lieu of a final exam. Grading the Projects The first project is graded as a pass/fail one. Your other four major projects will be evaluated by using the following criteria: “A” projects are projects of impressive quality that demonstrate thorough, thoughtful analysis and assignment interpretation. The quality of the ideas in the project are truly outstanding and evidence an excellent command of conventions that the assignment necessitates. You have been successful in meeting all due dates. “B” projects are projects of impressive quality that demonstrate thorough analysis and good assignment interpretation. The quality of the ideas in the project will be good. The project evidences at least a good command of conventions that the assignment necessitates. You have been successful in meeting all due dates. “C” projects have interpreted the assignment correctly and are of adequate quality. They demonstrate attention to the assignment but don’t go beyond it in any substantive way. The projects evidence at least an adequate command of conventions that the assignment necessitates. “D” and “F” projects evidence inadequate attention to ideas, to specifics of each assignment, and/or to conventions that the assignment necessitates. Reading (and viewing and listening) responses Due: When assigned, or immediately afterwards One of the requirements of the course is to post on Moodle a response/reaction/evaluation of certain class activities. Activities that require a written response/reaction include guest speakers, field trips, and videos. Writing a Response to Guest Speakers, Fieldtrips, and Videos. Consider at least ½-page response per event. These should be posted on Moodle by the next class meeting after the event or by Monday midnight of the following week. The intent of these assignments is to assist you in developing material that you can use for class papers. All class papers require synthesis of course readings and class activities. You are also welcome to post in Moodle responses to any of the readings, but this is not a requirement Responding in writing prior to discussion of a reading assignment allows you to deepen your understanding of the reading in preparation for your contribution to class discussion and gives you yet another way to develop material that you can use and synthesize in your class papers. Moodle postings of the previous week’s assigned readings/activities must be done by Monday midnight the following week. (In other words, if you don’t post by the time of the assigned activity, be sure to post your response by midnight on the Monday of the next week; otherwise, Moodle will not accept your responses.) Your reading responses will be averaged as part of the Daily Grade when midterm and final grades are given. 3 Evaluation Daily work 25% Five projects 75% Project 1 Project 2 Project 3 Project 4 Project 5 (final) 20% 5% 20% 10% 20% Special Arrangements If you need course adaptations or accommodations because of a disability, if you have medical and/or safety concerns to share with me, or if you need special arrangements in case the building must be evacuated, please see me as soon as possible. A word is dead When it is said, Some say. I say it just Begins to live That day. Emily Dickinson 4 Course Syllabus, Fall 2011 DATE Aug. 30 FOCUS ASSIGNMENTS DUE Class introduction Self portrait Sept. 1 How am I culture? Miner, Horace “Body Ritual Among the Nacirema” (http://www.msu.edu/~jdowell/miner. html) Sept. 6 How am I Language? Daniels, Harvey A. “Nine Ideas About Language” Sept. 8 Representations of poverty Irina’s “The Romantic and Dangerous Stranger” http://journal.mediaculture.org.au/0607/03-gendelman.php Sept. 13 Project Reports – I am… Project 1 due Sept. 15 Poverty – workshop on language Begin Sidewalk. Have Part One finished. Social justice Humanities Sept 20 Ethnographic observation workshop Read Part 2 - Sidewalk Sept. 22 Larry Mosqueda, Evergreen professor Read Part 3 - Sidewalk Sept. 27 Book Seminar Have first 3 sections of Sidewalk read 5 DATE Sept. 29 FOCUS All-day field trip to Seattle to map neighborhood (scene from Jane Street) ASSIGNMENTS DUE Review ethnographic example (posted in Moodle) Continue Sidewalk. Rather than field trip, you may volunteer at the Olympia soup Chapter from P. Bourgeois’ In Search of kitchen Respect (http://www.stmartin.edu/Campus Ministry/CommServ/CommKitchen .aspx) or attend the Food Summit at the Washington Center (see Irina for details) Oct. 4 Distribution of ethnographic example. Debrief trip Group Meetings for ethnographic project Continue Sidewalk. Oct. 6 Book Seminar Finish Sidewalk Oct. 11 Writing Blog/Flickr workshop – reserve LL Classroom (Irina) Project 2 due – the language and culture of poverty. Sidewalk Observation of Seattle Trip Oct. 13 Fall Break Food Summit at Washington Center Oct. 18 Discourse Analysis Discourse Analysis Workshop -- Take discourse from P. Bourgeois and use Cameron to analyze it Chapter from Cameron’s Working with Spoken Discourse. Visual Analysis Roland Barthes, Mythologies Oct. 20 6 Oct. 25 Project 3 – presentations Ethnography Flickr Start reading Glass Castle Oct. 27 History of English Language Roberts, Paul “A Brief History of English” DATE Nov. 1 FOCUS Language dialects Kephardt, Ron “Reading Creole English Does Not Destroy Your Brain Cells” Nov. 3 Who gets to use public spaces? Nickel and Dimed http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbustersblog/anonymous-joinsoccupywallstreet.html Nov. 8 The Wild Wonderful Whites of West Virginia (2009) (86 min) McCrum, Cran, and MacNeil “Scots-Irish Migrations” POWER (class visitor Monica) Lakoff, George “The Policy-Speak Disaster for Health Care” Nov. 10 ASSIGNMENTS DUE Nov. 15 Debrief movie and Monica’s visit Littleton, Greta “Spangorland: A Simulation for Language Policy” Nov. 17 Seminar Seminar on Glass Castle. (300-level students run the seminar.) Nov. 22 Paper due – language and culture in Glass Castle Start reading The Girl Who Fell From the Sky Special Guest – race and poverty Paper due -- How do language and culture shape the events of glass castle 7 Nov. 24 Thanksgiving Holiday DATE Nov. 29 Flag Wars (87 min) Dec. 1 Debrief movie Dec. 6 Seminar on The Girl Who Fell from the Sky Dec. 8 Reports (Response Sheets completed) Dec. 13 1 pm FOCUS ASSIGNMENTS DUE Synthesis assignment Finish -- The Girl Who Fell from the Sky. Paper Due in lieu of final at 1 pm 8