242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
BANGALORE
Minutes of the 242nd Meeting of SRC held at the Conference Hall
of NCTE, Bangalore on 14th, 15th & 16th April 2013
The following members attended the Meeting:1.
Sathyam
2
-
Chairman
Prof. K. Dorasami
-
Member
3.
Prof. Sandeep Ponnala
-
Member
4
Dr. M.P. Vijayakumar I.A.S(retired) -
Member
5.
Prof. M.S. Lalithamma
-
Member
Sri. P. Sriraman
Regional Director (I/c)
-
Convenor
6.
I.A.S (Retired)
The following members/Representative did not attend the Meeting
Prof. M.A. Khader. Member, and the Representatives of the Govt. of
Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Karnataka, Tamilnadu, U.T’s of Lakshadweep,
Pondicherry & Andaman & Nicobar Islands.
SOUTHERN REGIONAL COMMITTEE
1
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION
BANGALORE
MINUTES OF 242nd MEETING OF SRC-NCTE
Brief Description
Remarks of SRC
Confirmation of Minutes of 241st Meeting
held on 30th, 31st March & 1st April, 2013
Confirmed
Sl.
No.
1.
2.
Action Taken Report (ATR) on the
Minutes of 240th Meeting held on 9th –
11th March, 2013
Noted
Volume-01,
Consideration of Appeal cases (Vol-1)
Sl.N
o.
3.
Code
Course
Name of the
Institution
State
SRCAPP734
D.El.Ed
Jeremiah
College of
Education, East
Godavari
District
AP
Remarks
Jeremiah College of Education, Plot No. 673, Burugupadi Village & Post,
Korukonda Taluk, East Godavari District-530016, Andhra Pradesh.
Name of the Society:- Banaiah Christian Educational Society, 2nd Floor, Satya
Surya Complex, Opp Complex RTC Dwarakanagar, Vishakapatnam District530016, Andhra Pradesh
Name of the Institution:- Jeremiah College of Education, Plot No. 673,
Burugupadi Village & Post, Korukonda Taluk, East Godavari District-530016,
Andhra Pradesh
Sl
No.





Event
Date
Online
submission
of
application.
Submission of Hard copy
State
Govt.
Letter
for
recommendation was sent.
A letter was issued to the
intuition with request to submit
proof
of
dispatch
of
application.
The matter was placed before
SRC and the Committee
decided
to
reject
the
26.09.2011
Reference
page No.
29
28.09.2011
09.11.2011
31
32
09.11.2011
33
216th Meeting of
SRC held on 11th –
12th January 2012
35
2
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

















application summarily.
Accordingly, Rejection order
with original FDR’s were
issued to the institution.
Aggrieved by the order of
SRC, the institution preferred
an appeal a letter was
received form NCTE H'qrs with
directions to send original
application
along
with
comments.
Accordingly,
original
application with comments
was sent to NCTE H'qrs.
NCTE Appellate
authority
order was received.
Original
application
from
NCTE H'qrs was received
NCTE Appellate
authority
order was placed before SRC
and the Committee decided to
issue Show Cause Notice.
Before the issue of Show
Cause Notice, as per the
information of the website the
institution
has
submitted
written representation.
The Committee considered the
reply for Show Cause Notice
and
decided
to
Cause
Inspection.
VT Intimation letter was issued
to the institution
Inspection of the institution
was conducted
Inspection report was received
in the office of SRC
Committee considered the
Inspection report and decided
to issued Show Cause Notice.
29.03.2012
41
03.05.2012
52
14.05.2012
54
26.06.2012
55
29.06.2012
56
229th Meeting of
SRC held on 30th –
31st July 2012
63
21.08.2012
22.08.2013
and
69 and 74
231st Meeting held
on 22nd – 23rd
August 2012
76
31.08.2012
79
08.09.2012
105
14.09.2012
105
233rd Meeting of
SRC held on 26th –
28th
September
2012
Accordingly, a Show Cause 02.11.2012
Notice was issued
Reply for the Show Cause 19.11.2012
and
Notice was received
19.11.20.12
The Committee considered the 236th Meeting held
matter and decided to issue on 16th – 17th
letter of intent.
December, 2012
Accordingly, Letter of Intent 01.01.2013
was issued to the institution.
The institution had forwarded a 21.02.2013
copy of High Court order.
111
113
114 and 115
120
124
127
3
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013


A Court notice was received.
26.02.2013
135
A letter with gist of the case 04.03.2013
143
was
forwarded
to
the
Shri. K. Ramanath Reddy
(Standing Council).
The Hon’ble High Court in W.PMP No. 5297 of 2013 in W.P. No. 4240 of 2013
dated 13.2.2013 filed by Benaiah Christian Educational Society, Visakhapatnam
District, Andhra Pradesh. The Hon’ble Court has stated as follows: “The
petitioner submitted an application before the 1st respondent herein with a
request to grant recognition to start two years D.El.Ed course with an intake of
50 students from the current academic year. As required under the Regulations,
the applications, the application was filed through online on 26.9.2011 and a
hard copy thereof was dispatched on 30.9.2011. It is also stated that a copy was
directly handed over to the 1st respondent on 28.9.2011. However, taking the
view that the petitioner failed to dispatch the hard copy within one week from the
date of submission of the application through online, the 1st respondent rejected
the application, through proceedings dated 29.3.2012. In the appeal preferred by
the petitioner, the 4th respondent found fault with the order passed by the 1st
respondent and directed that the matter be considered on merits. Even
thereafter, the 1st respondent did not take immediate steps. It was only through
proceedings, dated 1.1.2013, that the petitioner was granted recognition for the
academic year 2013-14.
The petitioner contends that the third phase of the counseling for admission into
D.El.Ed course is scheduled to take place between 24.2.2013 and 27.2.2013.
Since there is ample time, the infrastructure arranged by the petitioner and
approved by the 1st respondent cannot be permitted to go waste.
Hence, there shall be interim direction to the effect that the recognition granted
by the 1st respondent for the petitioner-institution be treated as holding good for
the current academic year and the other respondents shall take steps
accordingly”.(Pg. no.145)
The Committee has noted that matter.
4.
APS03719
B.Ed
B.T.L. College
of Education
and B.T.L.
Educational
Trust,
Bangalore
KA
Judgement in W.P.No. 43577-43578 of 2012(EDN-RES) filed by B.T.L.
College of Education and BTL Educational Trust, Bangalore, Karnataka
B.T.L. College of Education, No. 259/B, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Hosur
Main Road, Bangalore-560099, Karnataka submitted an application for
seeking grant of recognition on 20.12.2004.
The application was processed and the recognition was granted to the institution for
offering B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 30.1.2006.
In the mean time NCTE-Hqrs. Vide its letter dated 22.9.2010 has forwarded a copy
of the inspection report dated 22.4.2010 conducted under section 13 of NCTE Act.
As there are deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report, NCTE-Hqrs., has
requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the
NCTE Act immediately.
The SRC in its 197th meeting held on 13th and 14th October, 2010 considered the
matter and decided to issue Show Cause Notice. Accordingly, Show Cause Notice
4
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
was issued to the institution on 6.12.2010 for the following defiencies: The Management is running Pre-University Course (PUC) in the same building
where B.Ed. programme is also conducted, which is not permissible as per
NCTE norms.
 The Built-up-area as per VT report is only 1094 sq.mts. which is inadequate as
per NCTE norms of 1500 sq.mts.
The institution has submitted written representation on 19.1.2011.
The SRC in its 200th meeting held on 20th and 21st January, 2011 considered written
representation of the institution for the deficiencies pointed out in its show cause
notice dated 6.12.2010, the management admitted in writing that they are
running pre-university course(PUC) in the same building where B.Ed
programme is also conducted.

The built up area allotted to B.Ed in one floor is only 1190 sq.mts,
which has been admitted in writing by the management. The built up
area is inadequate for B.Ed course as per NCTE norms.
Based on the above points the Committee decided to withdraw the recognition of
the B.Ed course run by B.T.L. College of Education, No. 259/B, Bommasandra
Industrial Area, Hosur Main Road, Bangalore, Karnataka from the academic year
2011-12 in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed course, if any, to
complete their course.
It was made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of this order. The affiliating body/examining
board/body be informed accordingly.
Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 11.3.2011.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs., and the appellate authority vide Order No. F.No.89-110/2011
Appeal/3rd Mtg.-2011 A36887 confirmed SRC’s decision and rejected the
appeal.
The institution approached Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka vide W.P.No.
23299 of 2011 wherein the 1st respondent is the Member Secretary, NCTE,
New Delhi and 2nd respondent is SRC, NCTE, Bangalore.
In the Court order dated 23.8.2011 in W.P.No.23299/2011 filed by the institution,
wherein the 1st respondent is the Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and the
2nd respondent is RD, SRC, NCTE, the Honble Court ordered that
i.
The Order passed by the 1st respondent(NCTE, New Delhi) dated
26.5.2011 is quashed.
ii.
The second respondent is directed to send a visiting team to the
petitioner college for inspection of the land and building made available
to the B.Ed. College.
iii.
The petitioners are directed to deposit the prescribed fee for re-inspection
as above within a period of two weeks from today with the 2nd
respondent.
5
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
iv.
v.
vi.
vii.
viii.
The second respondent is directed to send a visiting team to the
petitioner college for inspection of the land and building made available to
the B.Ed. College and submit its report to the first respondent within a
period of four weeks from the date of deposit of the amount as above.
The first respondent is directed to reconsider the matter afresh in
accordance with law after taking into consideration the materials placed
by the petitioners along with the memorandum of appeal as also the
report of the visiting team as above and pass appropriate orders thereon
in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of
receipt of the report.
The petitioners are permitted to admit the students for the current
academic year for the study of B.Ed. course subject to the result of the
order, which may be passed by the first respondent.
It is hereby clarified that in case the first respondent takes a view that the
petitioners have not provided necessary land and building as above, the
second respondent has to transfer the students so admitted to some
other B.Ed. Colleges.
Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. NO costs.
The Hon’ble Court vide order dated 23.8.2011 had quashed the appellate
authority order and directed SRC to conduct inspection of the land and
building made available to the B.Ed. College and submit its report to the
institution within a period of four weeks from the date of deposit of the
prescribed fee for re-inspection. The Hon’ble Court had directed the SRC
to reconsider the matter afresh in accordance with law after taking into
consideration the materials placed by the petitioners along with the
Memorandum of appeal as also the report of the visiting team as above
and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the report.
As per the orders of Hon’ble Court, re-inspection was conducted to the institution
on 14.10.2011.
The re-inspection report was inadvertently placed before the SRC in its 212th
meeting and the Committee decided to withdraw recognition to the institution and
withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 14.12.2011 w.e.f. 2011-12.
As per directions of Hon’ble Court in W.P. No. 23299 of 2011, SRC conducted
inspection of the institution on 14.10.2011. Inadvertently, the inspection report
was placed before 212th SRC meeting held on 24th October, 2011, instead of
forwarding the VT report to the NCTE, HQ for placing before the appellate
authority.
SRC based on the inspection report, took a decision withdraw the recognition of
the B.Ed course run by the B.T.L. College of Education, 259/B, Bommasandra
Industrial Area, Hosur Main Road, Bangalore-560 009, Karnataka from the
academic year 2011-12. Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the
institution vide this office Order No.F.SRO/NCTE/B.ED/2011-12/33865 dated
14.12.2011.
On 10th January, 2012, as per the discussions held with Smt. Subbalakshmi,
Under Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi who informed that this case is being listed
before the appeal committee and that the file had to be forwarded to NCTE, New
6
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Delhi. The original file was forwarded to NCTE, New Delhi on 10th January, 2012
along with the VT report. Legal advice was also sought from the Advocate, Sri.
Ashok Harnahalli vide this office letter No.36046 dated 10th January, 2012.
Since the matter was coming up before the Hon’ble Court on 18th January,
2012. As per HQ letter No.89-110/2011-Appeal dated 17.1.2012 which is
received by fax on 17th January, 2012, the matter is listed before the Appeal
Committee in its 1st Meeting/2012 held on 18th January, 2012. The same
was informed to the Advocate, Sri. Ashok Harnahalli on 17.01.2012.
The
Withdrawal
order
inadvertently
issued
vide
order
No.F.SRO/NCTE/B.ED/2011-2012/33865 dated 14.12.2011 was cancelled
vide office order No.F.SRO/NCTE/B.Ed./2011-12/36044 dated 17th January,
2012 based on the legal advice received from Shri. Ashok Harnahalli.
The committee in its 217th meeting held on 8-9 February, 2013 considered
the matter and decided to ratify the decision already taken regarding the
withdrawal order issued to the said institution vide order NO.
No.F.SRO/NCTE/B.ED/2011-2012/33865 dated 14.12.2011 is cancelled vide
this office order No.F.SRO/NCTE/B.Ed./2011-12/36044 dated 17th January,
2012 based on the legal advice received from Shri. Ashok Harnahalli and
the same is to be informed to NCTE (HQ).
In the meanwhile, the institution filed another W.P. No.46873-74/2011 against, 1.
MS, NCTE, New Delhi 2. RD, SRC, NCTE and 3. The Registrar, Bangalore
University. The Hon’ble Court vide order dated 18.1.2012 had ordered “Keeping
open all the contentions urged by the petitioners, these writ petitions are
disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail the opportunity before the
appellate authority and canvas all the contentions that are available to them
under law.”
The appellate authority considered the report of the institution and noted that
there is no land exclusively allotted for the B.Ed. programme. A mere
declaration that 2716 sq.mtrs. has been earmarked for consruction of an
independent building cannot be taken as a substitute for a formal and legally
binding document. In the circumstances, the Council concluded that the
withdrawal of recognition is justified and therefore it is upheld. The Appellate
authority vide order No.F.No.89-110/2011 Appeal dated 18.6.2012 confirmed the
orders of SRC dated 11.3.2011.
Aggrieved by the appellate authority order dated 18.6.2012, the institution filed
another W.P. No. 43577-78/2011 wherein the institution had prayed for an
interim order to stay the operation of orders of Appeal Annexure T.No. F.No.89110/2011 Appeal dated 18.6.2012 and Annexure P. No.APS03719 dated
4.10.2011 approving the report dated 14.10.2011 in its 212th meeting passed by
the 2nd respondent(SRC,NCTE) recommending to the 1st respondent and
Annexure E order passed by the SRC withdrawing the recognition invoking
Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act 1993 by its order No.F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011
27586 Code APS03719-B.Ed. dated 11.3.2011 all consequential orders. The
Hon’ble Court granted the interim order of stay to the institution on 13.12.2012
for a period of eight weeks which was further extended until further orders on
5.2.2013.
The advocate was requested to vacate the interim stay granted to the institution
by this office letters dated 21.2.2013 and 10.1.2013.
7
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
On 18.3.2013, the institution submitted a copy of the order dated 28.2.2013 in
W.P. No.43577-578/2012 and had requested to cancel the order of withdrawal of
recognition to the institution.
The order dated 28.2.2013 of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore
reads as under:- “The impugned orders passed by the respondent – authority
appears to be without taking into consideration the compliance report submitted
and also certain of the documents produced. In that view of the matter, the
impugned orders at Annexures -‘P’, ‘T’ and ‘E’ are quashed. However, it is
hereby directed to the 3rd respondent to secure any further documents, if need
be and accord permission to admit the students for the academic year 2012-13.
Ordered accordingly.”
As per the Order dated 28.2.2013, the direction is for the 3rd respondent to
admit the students for the academic year 2012-13.
The following orders are quashed:Annexure T. No. F.No.89-110/2011 Appeal dated 18.6.2012 confirming the
order of SRC dated 11.3.2011 &
Annexure P. Finding of the VT dated 24.10.2011 and SRC recommendation in
its 212th meeting passed by the 2nd respondent(SRC,NCTE) recommending to
the 1st respondent &
Annexure E order passed by the SRC withdrawing the recognition vide
No.F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/ 27586 dated 11.3.2011.
But, as per the Order of Hon’ble HC of Karnataka in W.P.No.23299/2011 dated
23.8.2011 filed by the institution, wherein the 1st respondent is the Member
Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi and the 2nd respondent is RD, SRC, NCTE, the
Honble Court had ordered that
 The first respondent is directed to reconsider the matter afresh in
accordance with law after taking into consideration the materials placed
by the petitioners along with the memorandum of appeal as also the
report of the visiting team as above and pass appropriate orders thereon
in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of
receipt of the report.
 The petitioners are permitted to admit the students for the current
academic year for the study of B.Ed. course subject to the result of the
order, which may be passed by the first respondent(MS, NCTE, ND).
 It is hereby clarified that in case the first respondent takes a view that the
petitioners have not provided necessary land and building as above, the
second respondent(SRC, NCTE) has to transfer the students so admitted
to some other B.Ed. Colleges.
The Committee considered the matter and noted that, the Hon’ble High
Court of Karnataka, vide order dt. 28.02.2013 has quashed the following
orders:
1) Withdrawing the recognition of the institution by SRC vide order dt.
11.03.2011.
2) Finding of the VT report dt. 24.10.20111 and SRC’s recommendation in
its 212th SRC meeting, passed by the 2nd respondent (SRCNCTE)
recommending to the 1st respondent.
8
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
3) Confirming the order of SRC by appellate authority vide order dt.
18.06.2012.
5.
APS01712
B.Ed
Rajiv Gandhi
College of
Education,
Tumkur District
KA
And further, the Hon’ble High Court has given direction to the Appellate
authority Petitioner No.1. i.e., Member Secretary, NCTE, New Delhi to
consider the matter afresh and pass appropriate order with law within a
period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the Court order. In view of
the above, the committee further decided and advised Southern Regional
Office to reiterate SRC’s position to the Appellate authority and await
decision in the appeal.
Rajiv Gandhi College of Education C/O HMS Education Society, Settyhally
Road, Tumkur District-572102, Karnataka
Rajiv Gandhi College of Education C/O HMS Education Society, Settyhally
Road, Tumkur District-572102, Karnataka has submitted an application for
starting B.Ed course on 30.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition on
25.11.2004 with an intake of 100 students.
This office is in receipt of letter No.TY: VCPS: 2011-12:98 dated 21.05.2011
from the Vice-chancellor, Tumkur University, Tumkur by enclosing a list of 19
institutions with the committee observations by conducting inspections.
The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9th-10th June, 2011 noted the inspection
report of the Vice-chancellor, Tumkur University, dated 21.05.2011 and the
deficiencies in the 19 institutions in Tumkur District and decided to issue show
cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a show cause notice
was issued to the institution on 08.07.2011. The institution submitted in its reply
on 01.08.2011.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September 2011 considered the
letter dt.21.05.2011 from Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University pointing out
deficiencies in the 19 Tumkur University colleges, and also the reply of the
above institution dt. 01.08.2011 and other documents submitted by the institution
and decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at premises Under
Section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify whether the institution is maintaining
instructional and infrastructural facilities as per NCTE norms. The institution is
directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, with
Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the all the courses being
run, in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was carried out on 29.10.2011.
In the meantime, Tumkur University vide letter received on 17.10.2011
conducted re-visit to the institution during 15-19 and 27th of July, 2011 and made
certain observations.
The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th and 12th January, 2012 considered the
VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided
to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a
Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 5.3.2012. The institution
vide its letter received by this office on 2.5.2012.
The SRC in its 226th meeting held on 9th and 10th July, 2012 considered the
written reply of the institution on the above matter and also the relevant
9
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the following
reasons:-














The details required as per Questionnaire is not filled up
completely.
As per the questionnaire, the land area is mentioned as 1500
sq.mtrs., the built up area mentioned as per the copy of the
building plan for B.Ed. and D.Ed. course is only 864 sq.mtrs as
against 3000 sq.mtrs.
As per the copy of the G.P.A. dt. 13.4.2009 registered in the office
of the sub-Registrar, the institution is having Tumkur Tq., Kasaba
hobli, Shettihalli gram panchayath, Khata No.249 with 1 acre area
i.e., 4840 sq.yards in the name of HMS Education Society.
Certified copy of the land document in the site No.48(as per copy
of building plan) is not submitted.
Approved blue print of the building plan is not submitted.
BCC approved by the Govt. authorized Engineer is not submitted.
Non-encumbrance certificate is not enclosed.
Original FDRs of Rs.5 lakhs and Rs. 3 lakhs are not submitted.
As per NCTE norms, the Principal should have Ph.D. with 10
years of experience in teacher education college.
Staff list approved by the affiliating University is not submitted.
No documentary proof submitted for having separate building
and separate facilities and removal of B.Sc., computer science
course from the institution.
No documentary proof is submitted for providing salary and other
benefits as per the State Government pay scale.
No documentary proof is submitted for purchasing of the books.
No documentary proof is submitted for separating the Science
lab. and action initiated to provide separate facilities.
Institution is required to submit Staff Profile duly signed by the
competent authority.
The reply submitted by the institution on 02.05.2012 for the above queries, has not
given proper and genuine reasons.
Based on the above points the committee decided to withdraw the recognition of
the B.Ed course run by the Rajiv Gandhi College of Education C/o HMS
Education Society, Settihally Road, Tumkur District-572102, Karnataka from
the academic year 2010-11, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in
B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.
It was made clear that the institution was debarred from making any further admission
subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body / Examining board /
body were informed accordingly. It was also decided to return Endowment funds and
Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore.
Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution vide No.
APS01712-B.Ed./KA/2012-2013/44404 dated 27.07.2012. Aggrieved by the
withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal before the appellate
authority and the appellate authority vide its Order No.89-577/2012
Appeal/10th Meeting-2012 dated 11.12.2012 concluded that there was no
10
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
justification to accept the appeal and has confirmed the order appealed
against.
The institution had also approached Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka vide
W.P.No.50102/2012 and WP Nos.5737-5786/2013 against R1-NCTE, Bangalore
and R2-Tumkur University.
On 27.3.2013, this office has received a copy of the judgement dated 30.1.2013
from the institution which is ordered as under:“7. Insofar as the impugned order passed at Annexure-B is concerned, the same
is quashed subject to petitioner complying with conditions other than the minor
deficiencies pointed out, since there is substantial compliance of major
deficiencies. It is for the 1st respondent Authority to accord approval of the
admission made for the academic year 2012-13. It is for the petitioner to pay the
court fee based on the number of candidates admitted to the course and it is for
the respondent No.1 authority to direct the petitioner to comply with the
deficiencies in another two months. If it is needed, respondent No.1 Authority
may inspect the petitioner institution once again. Ordered accordingly. Petition is
disposed of.”
The Committee considered the matter, decided and advised Southern
Regional Office to file appeal against the Hon’ble High Court order dt.
27.03.2013 citing Hon’ble Supreme Court Order about rigid application of
norms/standards and100% (Not just “Substantial”) compliance.
Keeping in view, Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, in the matter of
Bhanwar Kanwar Singh Shiksha Mahavidyalaya and ors. Which reads as
under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils
the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time
schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee
and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly
adhered to”.
6.
APS02187
B.Ed
Sree Krishna
College of
Education,
Tumkur District
KA
Sree Krishna College of Education, Mahalakshminagar, Batawadi, Tumkur
District, -572101, Karnataka
Recognition of Sree Krishna College of Education, Mahalakshminagar,
Batawadi, Tumkur District, -572101, Karnataka was withdrawn vide order no.
APSO2187 /B.Ed /KA /2012-13/43645 dated 09.07.2012 from the academic
session 2012-2013 for the following reasons


The management has not submitted Re-inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/As per VT report, total built up area available for B.Ed course & D.Ed course
together is 2300 sq.mrs. which is grossly inadequate for both the courses.
As per NCTE norms 3000 sq.mrs Approved building plan by the competent
civil authority is not submitted. The institution is required to submit fresh blue
11
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013










print and it should be clearly mentioning i.e. Khasara no, plot no, proposed
course, total area, built up area duly approved by competent authority with
resolution in all respect. If the institution is running other teacher education
courses / other technical courses in the same premises, the institution is
required to mention earmarked area for proposed course with total area and
built up area.
Building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is
not submitted.
Original Land usage certificate from competent Govt. authority is to be
submitted.
Non-encumbrance certificate from a competent Govt. authority is not
submitted.
Bye-laws of the Society are not submitted by the management.
The Principal is not qualified as per NCTE norms. Experience certificate and
percentage of marks are not mentioned.
The post of lecturer in foundation courses (one post) is vacant, not filled up.
One post of Methodology courses (Six posts) is vacant, not filled up.
Part time post of Lecturer in Art Education (one post) and Director of Physical
Education (one post) is not filled up.
The staff list is not approved by the affiliating body.
The management is paying salary to the staff is by cash not through Bank
Cheque.
The management has not submitted any reply to the show cause notice issued
on 13.02.2012 & has not made any request for late submission.
The institution has remained silent to the Show Cause Notice and still
deficiencies exists.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal order of SRC,NCTE, the institution filed an appeal
before the appellate authority and the appellate authority vide order dated
03/01/2013 confirmed the order appealed against.
In the mean time , the institution has filed a writ petition in the hon’ble High Court
of Karnataka in W.P.No. 3012/2013.
The institution has submitted a written representation on 06/03/2013 requesting
for review of recognition withdrawal order .
The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 3012/2013 dated 08/02/2013
has disposed the petition as under ;“ It is seen that the Petitioner-institution is established since 2004-2005 and was
running in a very disciplined manner by admitting candidates for all the academic
years till now. The third respondent-NCTE having observed certain deficiencies,
issued a Show Cause Notice on 11.07.2011 under section 17 of the NCTE Act,
asking to reply within 30 days. However on 13.04.2012 itself reply is said to have
been submitted by the Petitioner-institution. Ultimately, a final order has been
passed by the third and the fifth respondents, in the middle of the year, to stop
12
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
admissions for the academic year 2011-12..But what is to be noticed is, when an
authority has raised certain queries or pointed out some irregularities or any
other deficiency and asks the management to stop admissions for the academic
year, it was for the institution to approach the authority well before starting
admissions for the academic year the petitioner institution has also not
approached this court seeking for any similar directions to consider its case.The
petitioner could have questioned the same before commencement of admission
or it could have sought for an interim order/interim direction seeking permission
to admit students. However, it is for the petitioner-institution to approach the
respondent NCTE.
Since the petitioner has approached belatedly regarding its grievance against
the NCTE and also when the authorities have specifically directed the petitioner
institution not to admit the students for the academic year 2011-12, the
petitioner-institution can approach once again to take review of order passed by
respondent-NCTE and seek for regularizing the admissions made with out the
permission of the Government or the University.
With the above observation, this petition stands disposed of. ”
Note :
1. It is observed from the court order dated 08/02/2013 that the institution has
admitted students for the year academic session 2011-12.But the request of
the institution is to regularize the admissions made for the year 2012-2013
that is after the issue of withdrawal order dated 09.07.2012
2. As seen from the court order, the institution has stated that it has submitted
representation on 13.04.2012, but no representation is submitted to this
office by the institution as per office records.
The above matter was considered in the 241st meeting of SRC held on 29th
March to 1st April 2013 and the Committee decided as under
“ To regularize 2011-2012 because of Court Order, Reject the request for 20122013,Reiterate our withdrawal order. Quote the court order about not showing
any sympathy for admissions made in anticipation of Formal Recognition.”
On 03/04/2013, Secretary,Sree Krishna College of Education has submitted a
written representation with a request for review of the recognition withdrawal
order for the academic year 2012-2013 which is as under ;
1.W.P.No. 3012/2013 dated 08/02/2013 on the file of High Court of Karnataka
2. W.P.No. 12764/2013 dated 18/03/2013 on the file of High Court of Karnataka
3. Withdrawal order dated 09/-07/2012
1. As you are aware the recognition of our college was withdrawn from your
esteemed council
owing to some deficiencies in the college on 09/07/2012 and the college was
given time to
appeal to the National Council, New Delhi within 60 days from the date of
order passed.
13
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
2. Since we were given 60 days time for appeal we submitted the relevant
documents as we had
already complied with all the deficiencies listed by the SRC Inspection
Committee and waited
for further orders from the National Council. Since we had complied all
the deficiencies, in
anticipation of reconsideration of the withdrawal order from the NCTE,
New Delhi we made
the admissions for the academic year 2012 - 2013. As the time taken by
NCTE, New Delhi to
complete the procedure of disposing the appeal application took time till
January 9th , 2013
It was inevitable for us to complete the admission procedure within time as
per the calendar of
events of Tumkur University as we had already made admissions before
SRC,NCTE passed
the withdrawal order of recognition.
1. Keeping in view of the future of students admitted for the academic session
2012-13 the withdrawal order was challenged in W.P.No. 3012/2013.The
hon’ble High Court order dated 08.02.2013 passed an order directing to file a
review petition for regularization of admission made for the year 2012-13
and also for grant of recognition.
2. We submit that we have submitted the review petition on 05/03/2013 to
review the order of
withdrawal of recognition and also for regularization of admission made for
B.Ed course for 2012-2013.
3. Since the same was not considered the review petition submitted in terms of
the directions of
the Hon’ble High Court in W. P. No. 3012/13 dated 08/02/2013 we have
filed a writ petition
No.12764/2013. The Hon’ble
directed you to pass
High Court vide order
dated 18/03/2013
orders on review petition dated 05/03/2013 within three weeks. The copy
of the order dated
18/03/2013 is enclosed herewith for your ready reference and to pass
appropriate orders.
The Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in W.P.No. 12764 dated 18/03/2013 has
disposed the petition as under;
14
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
“ After the disposal of the writ petition, petitioner-institution has made a
representation dated 05.03.2013 addressed to the Regional Director, Southern
Regional Committee,National Council for Teacher Eduation,Bangalore making a
request for review of the order withdrawing the recognition granted to the
petitioner-institution and regularize the admissions already made.The present
writ petition is filed making a grievance that this representation is not considered
and therefore, a direction be issued to respondent No.1.
I find that the representation is made very recently on 05.03.2013.In the light of
the observations already made by this court,I am sure the 1st respondent will
consider the same in accordance with the law. Petitioner-institution is not
justified in rushing to this Court within two weeks from the date of making such a
representation even accepting the submission made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner that it will affect the interest of the petitioner-institution. The fact
remains that some reasonable time has to be granted to respondent No.1 to take
a decision based on the observations made by this court.If the first respondent
does not take any decision within a matter of three weeks from today, the
petitioner can approach this court seeking a direction as sought in this writ
petition. At this stage, I do not find any need to interfere in the matter. Hence the
writ petition is disposed of with the above observations.”
The Committee considered the matter and decided that,
1) the admission of students by the institution for the sessions when the
proceedings were in progress for removal of deficiencies was not correct
and not in line with Hon’ble Supreme Court order, which reads as under:
Judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in SLP © No.
14020/2009 filed by Adarsh Shiksha Mahavidalaya & others Vs Subhash
Rahaangdale & others is:
“ In future, the High Courts shall not entertain prayer for interim relief
by unrecognized institutions and the institutions which have not been
granted affiliation by the examination body and or the students admitted
by such institutions for permission to appear in the examination or for
declaration of the result of examination. This would also apply to the
recognized institutions if they admit students otherwise than in
accordance with the procedure contained in Appendix-1 of the
Regulations”.
Further, the Committee decided that
2) Original order for withdrawal of recognition was correct because many
deficiencies were there. It is reiterated that Southern Regional Committee
has no power to ‘review’ the institutions request for ‘review’ can not,
therefore, be considered.
7.
APS05708
B.Ed
Arulmigu
Vinayakar
Arulmigu Vinayakar Teacher Training Institute, No. 192, Panikkankuppam,
Kumbakonam Road, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District, Pin-607106,
Tamilnadu
15
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Cuddalore
District
TN
Arulmigu Vinayakar Teacher Training Institute, No. 192, Panikkankuppam,
Kumbakonam Road, Panruti Taluk, Cuddalore District, Pin-607106, Tamilnadu
had submitted an application for D.T.Ed Course on 30.12.2005. The institution
was granted recognition on 04.01.2008 with an annual intake of 50 students,
with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.
The State Government of Tamilnadu vide letter No. Rc.No.6790/C1/2008 dated
20.06.2008 forwarded a copy of complaint against the institution. The SRC
considered the complaint in its 161st meeting held on 06th-07th August 2008 and
decided to issue notice. Accordingly, a notice was issued on 24.10.2008 for the
following reasons:


The building has both RCC and asbestos roof. The RCC structure
houses only the principal room, office room, staff room and toilet. But the
main instructional rooms namely the classrooms, library, psychology
laboratory, computer laboratory, educational technology laboratory,
multipurpose hall, room for work experience and music are housed in the
asbestos shed.
As per sub-clause (10) of clause 8 of NCTE regulation, norms and
standards, notification dated 27.11.2007 (with effect from 10.12.2007),
“No Temporary structure/asbestos roofing shed shall be allowed”.
The institution had submitted its reply on 26.11.2008. The SRC considered the
reply in its 169th meeting held on 12th-13th January, 2009 and decided to
communicate those replies to the Government of Tamilnadu for their considered
response, for necessary action.
Accordingly, a letter was issued on 04.03.2009. Meanwhile, another complaint
was received against the institution for lacking with regard to infrastructure and
instructional facilities for various courses. The complaint was placed before SRC
in its 182nd meeting held on 31st August, 2009 and the Committee decided to
issue show cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act in order to call for
remarks on the complaint and also decided to call filled in Questionnaire.
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05.10.2009 on
the following points:




D.T.Ed. course was granted in the leased ACC shed.
No land was acquired.
Forgery documents and CD produced.
I.P. claimed trust.
The institution had submitted written representation on 29.10.2009, which was
placed in 187th meeting held on 29th-30th December, 2009. SRC considered the
written representation of the institution and decided to cause inspection under
Section 17 of NCTE Act.
Interim order already granted is extended till 22.02.2010 in W.P. no. 2421 of
2010 was placed in SRC in its 192nd meeting held on 10th-11th May 2010 and
decided that “copy of the complaint “excerpts” pertaining to the concerned
institutions had already been given to the concerned institutions and the remarks
of the institutions were also obtained and considered by the SRC; and hence the
visit to the institution be proceeded, without any further delay, in anticipation of
the inspection fee of Rs.40,000/- payable on this account as upheld by the
16
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Hon’ble High Court of Madras.
As per decision of SRC inspection of the institution was scheduled between 07th12th June, 2010. Instead submitting Rs.40,000/- as inspection fee, the institution
approached Hon’ble High Court Madras.
The SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21st-22nd June, 2010 considered the matter
and decided to await for the Final Court orders, and the current position of the
institution as per the Court orders be informed to the State and the affiliating
authorities. Further, NCTE counsel of High court of Madras was requested to
vacate the stay.
Letters were issued to the Principal of Secretary to
Government, School Education (UI) Department, Secretariat, Chennai – 600009
and The Director, DTERT, DPI Campus, College of Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu
on 03.08.2010.
A court order dtd. 14.03.2011 Crl.O.P. No. 4545 of 2011 filled by the
Superintendent of Police, Cuddalore reads as follows:
“ the respondents are directed to complete the enquiry within a period of two
weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and act in accordance
with law. The Criminal original Petition is disposed of with the above action”.
The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Cuddalore vide its letter
dtd. 28.06.2011 had the requested for getting documents for enquiry as per
Honble High Court order. Accordingly, documents were sent to the District
Crime Branch on 28.06.2011.
The institution vide its letter dtd. 23.01.2012 has stated that “ case in pending in
Honorable High Court in Chennai, so please stop any inspection according to
results. Two case is pending in honorable High Court one case in W/P
9420/2010 and another one case is 2463/2011. Inspection of 40,000/- already
value date is over. Six months (from 08.03.2011 to 08.09.2011. So renewal
after back to received amount with court any order received after any time to
conduct inspection, so kindly please wait for court results”.
The SRC in its 217th meeting held on 08th-09th February, 2012 considered the
matter and decided to instruct the Lawyer to seek permission from the Court to
inspect the institute and thereafter, to proceed with further action as per Law.
The Judgment dtd. 15.06.2012 in W.P. No. 1441 of 2012 and M.P.No. 1 of 2012
reads as under:-
“……..the fourth respondent (SRC, NCTE) is directed to consider the representation
petitioner, dated 08.03.2011 and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits a
accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than four weeks from the
receipt of a copy of this order.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Consequently, con
Miscellaneous Petition is closed”.
As per the institution vide its letter dtd. 19.01.2012 has stated that inspection fee
40,000/- Demand Draft date is expired. The institution is requested to amount
40,000/- we will paid court any order. Still the institution have not submitted the insp
fee of Rs. 40,000/17
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th-25th July, 2012 considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 19.01.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the
following:

The institution has not submitted inspection of Rs. 50000/- towards
causing inspection of the institution as per Court order.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 09.08.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 03.09.2012 and has
stated that:“ The Honourable High Court Judicature at Madras directed the (SRC, NCTE)
in W.P. 1441/2012 and M.P.1/2012 to inspect the institute functioning at New
Address
Address.
The institute is ready to pay the inspection fee of Rs. 50,000/- (as per new
rules and regulations) to inspect the institute functioning in the new address.
Hines:- Due to delay in inspecting the institution by the (SRC, NCTE) no
students were admitted for the past two academic years”.
Till date the institution has not submitted inspection fee of Rs. 50,000/-.
A copy of the letter received from Shri P.R. Gopinathan, Advocate has been
forwarded to Shir K.Ramakrishna Reddy on 04.09.2012 stating that “necessary
instructions pertaining to the compliance of the order in W.P.No. 1441/2012
order dated 15.06.2012, so that the same may be submitted before the Hon’ble
Court on 06.09.2012, when the matter is adjourned for Further, Hearing.”
Accordingly, a copy of the letter forwarded on 06.09.2012.
Till date the institution has not submitted inspection of Rs. 50,000/- towards
causing inspection of the institution as per Court order.
The SRC in its 240th meeting held on 09th-11th March, 2013 considered the Court
order, reply of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences and
decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:

The institution has not submitted till date inspection fee of Rs. 50000/towards causing shifting inspection of the institution as per Court
order.
Note: Simultaneously, verify what is the Interim order given on 8.6.2010 by
the High Court. Report in the next meeting.
Accordingly, Show Cause notice was issued to the institution on 08.04.2013 and
letter to the advocate on 08.04.2013.
In the meantime a letter has been received from SCERT, Chennai alongwith a
copy of the judgement dtd. 15.06.2012 in W.P. no. 1441 of 2012 and M.P. no. 1
of 2012 on 09.04.2013 which states as under:18
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
“ I am to state that the Management of the Arulmigu Vinayagar Teacher
Training Institute has filed a Writ Petition before the Hon’ble High Court
seeking for a direction directing the respondent herein to publish the results for
the for the students of the petitioner Institutes. The learned council for the
petitioner has submitted before the Hon’ble Court that petitioner has made a
request to SRC-NCTE on 08.03.2011 for shifting of the institute to the new
premises along with the demand draft for a sum of Rs.40000/-.
The Hon’ble High Court in their order dated 15.06.2012 made in
W.P.No.1441/2012 held that in para 5 is as follows.
The learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents have no
objection for this Court, passing an order directing the fourth respondent to
consider the request of the petitioner, made on 08.03.2011, and to pass
appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law.
In such circumstances, the fourth respondent is directed to consider
the representation of the petitioner, dated 08.03.2011, and pass appropriate
orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as
possible, not later than four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this
order.
I request you to communicate the orders if any passed in pursuant to
the orders of the Hon’ble High Court, so as to enable the State Council of
Research and Training for passing suitable orders in this matter. It should be
treated as most urgent”.
The Committee considered the matter and decided to await response from
the institution to the show cause notice issued to the institution vide letter
dt.08.04.2013 calling for payment of inspection fee of Rs. 50000/- and
advised Southern Regional Office to put up the case on 30th April,2013.
8.
APS04870
B.Ed
K.J.N.
Educational
College,
Chennai
TN
K.J.N. Educational College, Red Hills Bye Pass Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu
K.J.N. Educational College, Red Hills Bye Pass Road, Chennai, Tamilnadu had
submitted an application for B.Ed Course on 02.01.2006. The institution was
granted recognition on 09.01.2007 with an annual intake of 100 students, with
the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.
The institution had submitted a proposal alongwith DD of Rs. 40,000/- towards
inspection fee for shifting of premises. The matter was considered by SRC in its
202nd meeting held on 14th-15th March 2011 and decided to cause inspection.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution at proposal premises for shifting was
conducted on 16.04.2011.
The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th-19th May 2011 considered the VT
Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve
Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause
Notice was issued to the institution on 11.07.2011. The institution had submitted
in its reply on 20.07.2011.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 considered the
19
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
reply of the institution dt. 20.07.2011 and decided to serve Final Show Cause
Notice to all the courses under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Final
Show Cause notice was issued to the institution on 09.11.2011. The institution
had submitted its reply on 21.11.2011.
The SRC in its 215th meeting held on 12th-13th December, 2011 considered the
written reply of the institution dt. 21.11.2011 and other relevant documents and
decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses being run by the
institution at the premises under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The institution is
directed to submit the certain documents within 30 days of the receipt of the
notice, Duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for
land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent Govt.
Engineer and other relevant documents, along with inspection fee of Rs.
40,000/-. Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was conducted on
09.04.2012. The institution has not submitted the inspection fee for Rs. 40,000/The SRC in its 224th Meeting held on 14th-16th June, 2012 considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve
Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act, Accordingly, a Show cause notice was
issued to the institution on 24.07.2012. The institution had submitted its written
representation on 03.09.2012.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th -28th September, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 03.09.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice. Accordingly, a
Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 29.10.2012. The institution
had submitted its written representation on 31.12.2012 alongwith DD bearing no.
735132 dtd. 27.12.2012 for Rs. 40,000/- and 04.01.2013.
The matter placed before SRC in its 241st meeting held on 30th -31st March & 01st
April, 2013 and decided to withdraw recognition.
The institution moved to Hon’ble High Court of Madras in W.P. no. 9751/2013 &
M.P..no. 2 of 2013 dtd. 103.04.2013 reads as under:“ This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed
in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.B.RABU MANOHAR,
Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:Since it is represented by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that all the
defects pointed out by them in the final show cause notice dated 28.10.2012 have
been duly complied with as of now there is no defects, there shall be an order of
interim stay as prayed for”.
The Committee considered the Hon’ble High Court Order dt. 10.04.2013
and decided, noted that the deficiencies were there on the date of
withdrawal of recognition of the said institution. Subsequent removal of
deficiencies can not be of help to revive recognition.
Further, the Committee advised Southern Regional Office to request the
Hon’ble High Court through our Lawyer to vacate the interim stay order dt.
10.04.2013 and allow our order to the enforced.
20
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
9.
SRCAPP1503
D.El.Ed
Teacher
Mastan District
Institute of
Education and
Training
College D.Ed,
Guntur District
AP
Teacher Mastan District Institute of Education and Training College D.Ed,
Plot No. 517/A, T M Nagar, Mulakaluru Village and Post office, Narasarao
Pet Taluk and City, Guntur District – 522601, Andhra Pradesh.
Teacher Mastan Muslim Minority Educational Society, Plot No. 13-5-1, Islampet
Street, Narasaraopet Village and Post office and Taluk and City, Guntur District
– 522601, AndhraPradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Teacher
Mastan District Institute of Education and Training College D.Ed, Plot No. 517/A,
T M Nagar, Mulakaluru Village and Post office, Narasarao Pet Taluk and City,
Guntur District – 522601, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of Two years
duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical application has been
received in the office of SRC on 10.10.2011..
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 09.11.2011 / 28.12.2011 (Reminder). A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011 and the institution
has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on01.03.2012.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April 2012, considered the reply of
the institution dt. 01.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it
was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
14.05.2012.The institution has submitted its written representation on
05.06.2012.
The institution has submitted reply for Show Cause Notice after the stipulated
time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.
The SRC in its 224th Meeting held on 14th-16th-June, 2012 considered the reply
of the institution, which is received on 05/06/2012, i.e., after 22 (Twenty two)
days from the date of issue of show cause notice dt. 14/05/2012 and with
reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective
application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 09.07.2012.
Email letter has been received from Legal Counsel on 10.07.2012. Our legal
counsel has requested to place before SRC.
The SRC in its 226th Meeting held on 09th-10th July, 2012 considered the matter
and decided to process after receipt of Court order. (Court order is not received).
The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th – 25th July, 2012 has considered the
matter and as per Court order and all other relevant documents and decided to
cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
As per the direction of SRC, the inspection of the institution was conducted on
12.08.2012. VT Report received at SRC on 14.08.2012.
21
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The SRC in its 231st meeting held on 22nd – 23rd August 2012 considered the
VTR, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:



Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalized Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name is
not given.
As per VT report, in essential data sheet, multipurpose hall size is not
mentioned.
As seen from VCD, the country material to doors, windows for putting the
roof to the first floor still not removed indicating the building is still under
construction. As per regulations 2009, which is not permissible.
Accordingly, by seeing the SRC website the institution has submitted the written
representation on 24.09.2012.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all
relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993,
Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the
table, the SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th September 2012 decided to
issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year
duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year
2013-14 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted
selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating
University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic
session.
Accordingly, LETTER OF INTENT was issued to the institution on 04.10.2012.
the institution has submitted its reply on 17.10.2012.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 has decided that
Formal Recognition be granted to D.El.Ed., course of two year duration with an
annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students from the session 2013-14.
Accordingly, a Formal Recognition order was issued to the institution on
29/11/2012.
Meantime, Hon’ble High Court order received from Andhra Pradesh in W.P.No.
36024 of 2012 dated 05/12/2012 stated that “…the petitioners submitted an
application before the SRC (for short the committee) with a request to grant
recognition for D.El.Ed course from the academic year 2012-2013 onwards. After
processing the application. Proceedings were issued by the committee
permitting the petitioners to run the said course from the academic year 20132014 onwards. The petitioners feel aggrieved by the denial of recognition for the
current academic year.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Stading Counsel
for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
It is no doubt true that the application of the petitioners was to enable them to
conduct the course from the current academic year onwards. However, taking
various aspects into account, the Council has accorded recognition form the next
academic year onwards. In case the petitioners are not satisfied with the
22
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
proceedings issued by the committee, they can prefer an appeal before the
NCTE as a matter of fact, a Division Bench of this court in W.A. No. 1457 of
2012 has taken such a view.
Hence, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to avail
the remedy of appeal. If the petitioners present an appeal, the appellate authority
shall dispose of the same, within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of
receipt thereof. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petition filed in this writ petition shall also stand disposed of”.
The Committee has noted the matter.
10.
SRCAPP79
B.P.Ed
Golden Valley
Institute of
Physical
Education,
Chittoor District
AP
Golden Valley Institute of Physical Education, Khasara/Plot No. 543,
Kurabalakota Village, Angallur Post Office, Madanaalle Taluka and City,
Chittoor District – 517 327, Andhra Pradesh.
Golden Valley, Plot No. 543, Kadiri Road, Angallu Village, Madanapalle
Taluka and City, Chittoor District – 517 325, Andhra Pradesh had applied for
grant of recognition to Golden Valley Institute of Physical Education,
Khasara/Plot No. 543, Kurabalakota Village, Angallur Post Office,
Madanaalle Taluka and City, Chittoor District – 517 327, Andhra Pradesh for
B.P.Ed Course for one year duration under Section 14 of the NCTE Act, 1993 to
the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012. The institution
has submitted hard copy of the application on 09.01.2013 (date of dispatch as
per speed post – 07.01.2013.
NCTE-Hqrs., had directed to process the applications in accordance with
NCTE Regulations 2009 and it amendment notified on 26th November, 2010
which reads as follows:
Para 7[1-A(i)]
 The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of
submission of online application;
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within
7 days of the submission of the online application;
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority
indicating that the society/institution applying for the course
possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched within
7 days of the submission of the online application.
Para 7[1-A(ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under the
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the
applicant and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online submission
of the application.
Further, 8 (7) (i) of NCTE Regulations read as under
“No institution shall be granted recognition under these Regulations unless the
23
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
institution or society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land
on the date of application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either
on ownership basis or on lease from Government or Government institutions for
a period of not less than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or Union
Territory laws the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the
State Government or Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However,
no building shall be taken on lease for running any teacher training course”.
The SRC considered the matter in its 238th meeting held on 5th and 6th
February, 2013 and on careful perusal of the original file of the institution and
other related documents. NCTE Act, 1993 Regulations and guidelines from
time to time laid on the table the Regional Committee decided to reject the
application on the following grounds:
Hard copy in triplicate of the on-line application is not dispatched
within 7 days of
the submission of the on-line application as per Para
7(1-A(i)}b.
Accordingly, rejection letter was issued to the institution on 6.3.2013.
The institution Golden Valley institute of Physical Education, Chittoor, Andhra
Pradesh has submitted written representation on 2.4.2013 enclosing Hon’ble
High Court order and also enclosing two sets of application and certificated copy
of land registration documents.
The Hon’ble Court order stated as follows; “Order of the National Council for
Teacher Education(NCTE) Sourthern Regional, Bangalore, rejecting the
application of the petitioner-institution for establishing B.P.Ed course on the
ground that hard copy in Hard copy in triplicate of the online application prima
facie appears to be highly technical objection. It is not in dispute that the online
application was made by the petitioner on 31.12.2012 and the hard copies were
dispatched within 7 days by speed post on 7.1.2013 and it was received on
9.1.2013. At the most, the non-submission of hardcopy in triplicate, is a
deficiency under Regulation no. 7(1) of the National Council for teacher
education(recognition norms and procedures) Regulation, 2009.
In view of the same, there shall be a direction to the respondent to consider and
process the application of the petitioner for granting recognition as per law.
Notice”.
Original court order not received from the Hon’ble High Court order.
The Committee considered the Hon’ble High Court order and decided to
file an appeal. The committee also is of the view that , it is, not just a
“technical objection” for rejection of the application of the petitionerinstitution for establishing B.P.Ed course on the ground that hard copy in
triplicate of the on-line application is not submitted within 7 days as per
NCTE Regulations 2009. It is a case of strict application of norms and
standards as directed by S,C, in their order dt. 31-01-2011 in case Civil
Appeal No.1125-1128/2011 in SLP, SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs
ors, which reads as under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
24
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils
the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time
schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee
and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly
adhered to”.
11.
SRCAPP514
D.El.Ed-Al
Sri
Venkateshwara
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Kadapa District
AP
Sri Venkateswara Teacher Training Institute, Plot No. 44/98-3-2,
Chemmumiapet Village, Ravindra Nagar Post, Kadapa Taluk, Kadapa
District - 516003, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Venkateswara Educational Society, Plot No. 44/98-3-2, Chemmumiapet
Village, Ravindra Nagar Post, Kadapa Taluk, Kadapa District - 516003, Andhra
Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Venkateswara Teacher
Training Institute, Plot No. 44/98-3-2, Chemmumiapet Village, Ravindra Nagar
Post, Kadapa Taluk, Kadapa District - 516003, Andhra Pradesh. for D.El.Ed-AI
Course of two years duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 13.09.2011and physical
application has been received in the office of SRC on 23.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 14.10.2011/09.01.2012 (Reminder). A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 08.12.2011. The institution has
replied to the deficiency letter on 27.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th-31st March, 2012 considered the reply
of the institution dt. 27.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26/4/2012. The
institution has submitted written representation on 25/05/2012.
The SRC in its 223rd meeting held on 29th – 31st May,2012 considered the reply
of the institution to the show cause notice .The reply is unconvincing and not
satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:




In the building plan submitted, proposed college name is not given and
total plot area is given as 3400 sq.mtrs and total built up area is given
as 3753.60 sq.mtrs, from this it implies that the entire land is covered
with building. There is not scope for play grounds and other facilitites.
As per Building completion certificate submitted, column No 2 shows
owner of the building is individual, which is not permissible as per
NCTE norms.
In the Affidavit submitted, Sy.No. is not mentioned.
Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for
conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC decided as per
NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.El.Ed course.
25
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 29.06.2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-398/2012
Appeal/8th Meeting-2012 dated 05.09.2012 states that “…after perusal of the
documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, and after considering the
oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded that
there was no ground to accept the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is
rejected and SRC order dated 29.06.2012 is confirmed.’
The appellate authority order was placed in 233rd Meeting of SRC held on 26th28th September, 2012 has noted the matter of confirmation of SRC decision.
The Hon’ble High Court order received from Andhra Pradesh in W.P.No. 22484
of 2012 dated 24/07/2012 stated that “this writ petition is filed for a
Mandamus to set aside proceedings in F.No.SRCAPP514/D.El.Ed/Andhra
Pradesh/2011-2012/43284, dated 29/06/2012 of respondent No. 2.
The second petitioner is an existing Educational Institution conducting
D.El.Ed course. it has made an online application on 13/09/2011 and
physical application, which was received by respondent No. 2 on
23/09/2011 for sanction of additional intake. In the 220th Meeting held on
30th-31st March, 2012, respondent No. 2 has rejected the second petitioners
application on four different grounds, which are mentioned in the
impugned order.
At the hearing, Mr. Y. Nagi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners,
submitted and in my view rightly, that respondent No. 2 has failed to apply
its mind while rejecting the second petitioners application. He has
submitted that while the petitioners have applied for sanction of additional
intake, respondent No. 2 has considered their application as a fresh one
made for establishment of an Educational Institution under Section 14 (10
of the National Council for Teachers Education Act, 1993 (for short the
Act).
A perusal of the record would show that the second petitioner is an
existing institution and has made its application under section 15 of the
Act for sanction of additional intake. A perusal of the impugned order
shows that respondent NO. 2 has treated the said application as one made
under Section 14 (1) of the Act for permission to start an Educational
Institution. this itself would show a complete non- application of mind on
the part of respondent No.2 therefore, without going into the merits of the
reasons contained in the impugned order, the same is set aside with the
direction to respondent No, 2 to reconsider the second petitioners
application under section 15 of the Act and pass a fresh order and
communicate the same to the petitioners within a period of one month
from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Subject to the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
As a sequel, W.P.M.P. No.28806 of 2012, filed by the petitioners for interim
relief, is disposed of as infructuous.”
26
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The SRC in its 240th Meeting held on 09th – 11th March, 2013 considered the
Hon’ble High Court order dt. 24/07/2012 and decided and advised Southern
Regional Office to correct the registration of the case as D.El.Ed – Al
(SRCAPP514) in place of D.El.Ed (APS02699), as directed by the Court. Since,
the institution has applied on-line for D.El.Ed – Al under section 15 of NCTE Act.
Further the Committee advised Southern Regional Office to link up the original
basic unit file (APS02699) and process a new.
Accordingly both the files of the institution i.e. D.Ed and D.El.Ed – AI are linked
Application No.
APS02699
Course applied for: D.Ed
Name of the Institution: Sri.
Venkateeshwara Teacher Training
Institute,
Rayachoti
Road,
Chlmmumla Pet, Cuddapah District
– 516003, Andhra Pradesh.
Name of the Society: Sri
Venkateswara Educational Society,
Cuddapah, Andhra Pradesh.
Survey Number: 577/2, 3 at
Chemumipeta.
Brief of the institution.
Application Code:
SRCAPP514
Course applied for:
D.El.Ed – AI.
Name of the Institution: Sri Venkateswara
Training Institute, Plot No. 44/98-3-2, Chemm
Village, Ravindra Nagar Post, Kadapa Taluk,
District - 516003, Andhra Pradesh.
Name of the Society: Sri Venkateswara Edu
Society, Plot No. 44/98-3-2, Chemmumiapet
Ravindra Nagar Post, Kadapa Taluk, Kadapa
516003, Andhra Pradesh.
Survey Number: 577/1, /2, 3 at Chemumipet
The application was processed for
D.El.Ed – AI only i.e. under Section
Sri.
Venkateeshwara
Teacher 15(1). Since, as per minutes and
Training Institute, Rayachoti Road, rejection order it is mentioned
Chlmmumla Pet, Cuddapah District – inadvertently as Under Section 14(1).
516003, Andhra Pradesh has applied
under the provision of the NCTE
notification dated 01.01.2004 which
provides an opportunity for the
existing B.Ed college to start an
elementary
teacher
training
programme without No Objection
Order form the state government.
SRC considered the visiting team
report
and
found
that
the
infrastructural
and
instructional
facilities are satisfactory as per
section 15(3)(a) of the NCTE Act.
SRC decided to accord recognition to
the institution with an intake of 50
from the session 2005-2006, with the
condition that staff list approved by
Director, SCERT be submitted before
commencement of admissions.
Accordingly Recognition was granted
to the institution for D.Ed course of
two year duration from the academic
session 2005-2006 vide order No.
27
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
F.SRC/NCTE/D.Ed/2005-2006/2072
DATED 28.07.2005for D.Ed course of
two years duration from the academic
session 2005-2006.
The Committee duly considered the Hon’ble High Court directions dt.
24/07/2012, deficiencies still persist as under:

The institution has submitted certificate issued by the Commissioner,
the land is a residential land use and is in individual’s name. As per
NCTE Regulations, the land should be converted to Non-agricultural
purpose from Agriculture for the Education purpose only.

The land is in individual name, which is not permissible as per NCTE
regulations 2009.

The Building Completion Certificate issued is in individual name,i.e., in
the name of Mr. S. Govardhana Reddy. which is not permissible as per
NCTE Regulations 2009.

In the affidavit submitted, S y. NO. is not mentioned.
The application was even originally processed for D.El.Ed-Al only under
Section 15 (1). The order for rejection was wrongly cited as Section 14 (1).
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee
decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application
of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed –Al course under Section 15 (1).
Vol-01
As per Decision of the SRC 236th, 240th and 241st Meeting decision of the following files are put up
for consideration
12.
APS09534
B.Ed
Periyar
Maniammal
University,
Department of
Education
School of
Humanities
Universities,
Science &
Management,
Thanjavur
District
TN
Periyar Maniammal University, Department of Education School of
Humanities Universities, Science & Management, Periyar Nagar, Vallam,
Thanjavur-613403, Tamilnadu
Periyar Maniammal University, Department of Education School of Humanities
Universities, Science & Management, Periyar Nagar, Vallam, Thanjavur-613403,
Tamilnadu had submitted an application for B.Ed Course on 17.06.2008. The
institution was granted recognition on 25.09.2009 with an annual intake of 100
students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.
The institution vide its letter dated 20.12.2011 submitted its proposal for change
of premises for the programme within the University campus. Accordingly, a
letter sent to the institution seeking for Rs. 40,000/- towards change of premises
along with documents on 04.01.2012.
The institution vide its letter dtd. 08.02.2012 submitted required documents and
28
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
DD bearing no. 644257 dtd. 25.01.2012 for Rs. 40,000/- towards change of
premises fee on 08.02.2012.
The NCTE, Hqrs vide letter dtd. 27.02.2012 had forwarded a complaint dtd.
16.01.2012 which was received against the institution from Dr. B.
Ramaswamy, Mayur Vihar, Delhi-110091. NCTE, Hqrs has stated that “some
allegations have been made by complainant against the aforesaid
institution. You are, therefore, requested to examine the matter and to take
necessary action against the institution as per the NCTE Act, 1993, by
placing the complaint before the Regional Committee and to furnish action
taken to NCTE, Hqrs., New Delhi within a month”.
The SRC in its 219th meeting held on 15th-16th March, 2012 considered the matter
and decided to call for Affidavit from the complainant.
Also the committee
decided to call for comments from the institution after receiving the affidavit from
the complainant.
Accordingly, a letter was sent to the complainant on 13.04.2012.
complainant has not submitted any affidavit till date.
The
The institution has submitted shifting inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/- on
08.02.2012. Further, as per NCTE notification dated 13.09.2011, the institution is
required to submit another Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) as shifting fee as per
norms.
Further, the NCTE Hqrs has forwarded a complaint against the institution on
06.12.2012 from
Dr. B.Ramaswamy, Mayur Vihar, Delhi-110091 and
has requested to take necessary action against the institution as per the NCTE
Act, 1993, by placing the complaint before the Regional Committee.
The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th -17th December, 2012 considered the
complaint matter and reply of the institution dt. 08.02.2012 and all other relevant
documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to
examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for
the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any,
were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms, after collecting balance of
inspection fee of Rs. 10000/- and instruct VT members to look into the specific
allegations in the complaint.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 15th-19th January, 2013. The
same was intimated to the institution on 08.01.2013. The inspection of the
institution was conducted
on 19.01.2013 and has submitted balance of
inspection fee of DD bearing no. 543665 dtd. 17.01.2013 of Rs. 10,000/-.
The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 30th-31st March & 01st April, 2013 decided
to put up with details in the standard format in the next SRC meeting.
The Committee considered the VT report, VCD and also the relevant
documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the
following reasons:
Certified copy of land documents issued by the Sub-Registrar is not
submitted. If the documents are in Tamil, Notarised English version of
29
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
the same required.

Non-Encumbrance Certificate is not submitted in original and the
University has submitted Non-Encumbrance Certificate in the name of
Periyar Maniammal Institute of Science and Technology and not in the
name of Periyar Maniammai College of Technology for Women. This
needs clarification.
Notarised English version of Encumbrance
Certificate is required.

The University has submitted the Deed of Declaration in the name of
Periyar Maniammai College of Technology for Women. Whereas, the
Non-Encumbrance Certificate is in favour of Periyar Maniammal
Institute of Science and Technology. This needs clarification.

The University has submitted photocopy of the affidavit. In the affidavit
built-up area is not mentioned. Hence, fresh original affidavit showing
built-up area is required.

Blue Print of the Building Plan required, if the approving authority is in
Regional Language, Notarised English version of the same required.

Original FDRs of Rs. 5 lacs and Rs. 3 lacs from Nationalised Bank for a
duration of 5 years required.

Principal/Head is having only 4 years of Teaching experience is college
of Education. As per NCTE norms Ten years teaching experience is
required out of which at least 5 years teaching experience in a
Secondary Teacher Education institution.

Lecturer in Foundation course and Methodology course are not
identified. Lecturer in Art Education is not having Master Degree in
Fine Arts/Music with 55% marks. Hence, Lecturer in Art Education with
required qualification required to be appointed as per NCTE norms.

As per NCTE norms at least one lecturer should have specialization in
ICT and another in the special education.
The institution has failed to follow the rigid application of NCTE norms and
standards. It is a case of strict application of norms and standards as
directed by S,C, in their order dt. 31-01-2011 in case Civil Appeal No.11251128/2011 in SLP, SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which
reads as under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils
the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by the Periyar Maniammal University,
Department of Education School of Humanities Universities, Science &
Management, Periyar Nagar, Vallam, Thanjavur-613403, Tamilnadu, from
30
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of
students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
13
APS08690
B.Ed
Annai
Veilankannis
College of
Education,
Chennai
TN
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Annai Veilankannis College of Education, No. 33, Nedunggudran Village,
Gandhi Road, Chengalpattu, Chennai-600048, Tamilnadu
Annai Veilankannis College of Education, No. 33, Nedunggudran Village, Gandhi
Road, Chengalpattu, Chennai-600048, Tamilnadu had submitted an application
for B.Ed Course on 16.05.2007. The institution was granted recognition on
20.02.2008 with an annual intake of 100 students, with the condition to shift to
own premises within 3 years.
The institution vide its letter dated 12.03.2012 has submitted DD bearing no.
514873
dtd. 05.03.2012 for Rs. 40,000/- towards shifting of premises.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012, considered the matter
and all relevant documents and decided to cause shifting inspection to examine
infrastructural and instructional facilities provided and whether the institution
fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme,
subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, as per the norms. Accordingly, inspection of the institution was
carried out on 23.05.2012.
The SRC in its 224th meeting held on 14th-17th June 2012, considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve
Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:









The institution has submitted a copy of lease deed dated 17.03.1999 in
favour of the Trust/Society for a period of 55 years. However, as per
clause 8(7) (iv) of NCTE norms & standards, 2009, the title of the land
should be vested in the name of institution on ownership basis. Hence,
certified copy of the registered land documents in the name of the
institution is required.
Approved blue print of building plan is not submitted. Total land area
is also not mentioned.
Original affidavit is not submitted. In affidavit Sy. No. not mentioned.
Building completion certificate not submitted.
Notarized copy of Land use certificate is not submitted.
Non-Encumbrance certificate is not submitted.
Photocopy of FDRs for 5.00 lakhs & 3.00 lakhs submitted. Required to
submit original FDRs. Original FDRs were not shown to VT members
for verification.
The total land area is only 16053 sq.ft which is grossly inadequate
against the requirement of 2500 aq.mts as per NCTE norms &
standards, 2009 for one unit of B.Ed.
The library has 3256 books only. Since it has been running since 200831
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013





09, therefore, the library should have been augmented with addition of
200 books annually and it has now at least 3800 books.
As per VT report, language learning lab needs to be strengthened.
1+6 faculty is inadequate for one unit of B.Ed against the requirement
of 1+7+2 as per NCTE norms & standards, 2009.
Lecture(s) in fine Arts/Physical Education are not available.
As per staff profiles and VTR, consolidated salary is being paid in cash
which is not allowed as per NCTE norms & standards, 2009.
Fresh VCD to be submitted.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 04.07.2012.
The institution submitted its reply on 23.07.2012.
The SRC in its 229th meeting held on 30th-31st July,2012 considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 23.07.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Final Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act for
the following:





Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil
authority is not submitted. The copy of the building plan submitted is not
clear and readable. In the building plan all the rooms are given
nomenclature as class rooms, it is not being segrated for Prinicpal,
multipurpose hall, seminar hall and labs.
Original Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs. 100/- stamp paper duly
attested by oath Commissioner or notary public, is not submitted.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in favour of Society/college/institution & in joint
name is not given.
Approved staff list from the concerned affiliating body/University is not
submitted with their percentage of marks and grade.
No documentary proof is made available for payment of salary to the staff
by Cheque through Bank.
Accordingly, by seeing the website the institution had submitted its written
representation on 27.08.2012.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 27.08.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Final Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act for
the following:




In the letter submitted to SRC, the institution has stated that 1+10 faculty
members are available, whereas in the letter submitted to TTEU, only
1+9 faculty members are mentioned.
Lecturer in foundation course is not appointed.
Lecturer in Fine Arts is not eligible.
Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted. Notarised English version of encumbrance certificate is also
not submitted.
Accordingly, a Final Show cause notice was issued to the institution on
29.10.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on
32
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
05.11.2012.
The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 21st -22nd November, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 05.11.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act for
the following:

The institution has not submitted duly approved staff list from affiliating
body/University.
 Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted.
 The institution has submitted copy of the registered land document and it
was executed on 30.12.2002.
Whereas non-encumbrance dt.
29.10.2012 is not reflecting land document details and institution/Society
name. It needs clarification.
Accordingly, by seeing website the institution had submitted its written
representation on 17.12.2012.
The SRC in its 240th meeting held on 09th -11th March, 2013 and decide to
withdraw recognition Minutes not yet finalized.
In the meantime, the institution moved to the Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at
Madras in W.P.no. 5526 of 2013 and interim order dtd.19.03.2013 reads as
under:“…… this petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the
affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of
M/SB.RABU MANOHAR, Advocate for the petitioner the cost made the
following order:There shall be an order of interim injunction for a period of three weeks.
Notice. Private notice is also permitted”.
The above was placed before SRC in its 241st meeting held on 30th-31st March &
1st April, 2013 and SRC decided to process and put up 242nd meeting. A letter
was sent to the advocate on 09.04.2013 to vacate the stay.
Further, SRC NCTE has received interim order dt 19.03.2013 on 08.04.2013
which reads as under
“…. the petitioner above named has presented the above petition, praying that
in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, a copy of
which is annexed hereto, the High Court will be pleased to pass an order of
interim injunction, restraining the Respondent from withdrawing the recognition
granted to the petitioner institution dt. 20.02.2008, pending disposal of this writ
petition and whereas the petition will come up for hearing on 09.04.2013, you
are hereby directed to appear, in person or by advocate, to show cause why
the petitioner’s prayer should not be granted, in default of which, the matter
will be heard and decided in your absence”.
SRC NCTE has received interim injunction dtd. 19.03.2013 on 25.03.2013 which
reads as under:33
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
“ There shall be an order of interim injunction for a period of three weeks”.
The Committee considered the Hon’ble High Court interim Injunction order
dt. 19.03.2013 received on 25.03.2012 and decided as under:
1) To move for vocation of ‘interim stay’ if stay continues, if
final order is not received within 2 days. Check with lawyer.
2) If the final order allows the petition, file an appeal.
3) The institution was given/shown extraordinary consideration
by giving 4 show cause notices to rectify the deficiencies.
But, even then the deficiencies are persisting.
Further, the committee reiterates that the order of withdrawal of
recognition of the institution is in order, as It is a case of strict application
of norms and standards as directed by S,C, in their order dt. 31-01-2011 in
case Civil Appeal No.1125-1128/2011 inSLP, SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by
NCTE Vs ors, which reads as under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils
the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time
schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee
and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly
adhered to”.
14
APS04362
B.Ed
B.K.R. College
of Education,
Thiruvallur
District
TN
B.K.R College of Education, No. 45/22E, Madras Bye Pass Road, Thiruttani631209, Thiruvallur District, Tamilnadu.
B.K.R College of Education, No. 45/22E, Madras Bye Pass Road, Thiruttani631209, Tamilnadu was granted of recognition to D.T.Ed course on 13.09.2004,
D.T.Ed-AI course on 12.08.2005, B.Ed course on 27.12.2004 and M.Ed course
on 11.12.2007.
The inspection of the institution was conducted and the report was placed before
the SRC in its meeting held on 19th October 2005 and decided to accord
recognition to the institution for offering B.Ed course from the academic session
2006-2007.
In the meanwhile, some of the institutions which have been granted recognition
for the subsequent year have preferred appeal before NCTE, New Delhi to
reconsider their cases of grant of recognition for the session 2005-06 itself
instead of 2006-07. The NCTE, New Delhi vide order No.F.No.89-156/2005
Appeal dated 28.09.2005 has remanded back the case to SRC with a direction
to reconsider these cases immediately for grant of recognition for the session
2005-06.
SRC in its 104th meeting held on 09th–10th November, 2005 has considered the
legal opinion obtained in this regard and has taken a decision to grant
recognition for the session 2005-06 to those institutions who have submitted
belated NOCs/Endorsements and also the essential documents mentioned in
Appendix-1B of NCTE Regulations as one time exception. Accordingly,
34
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
recognition order was issued to the institution on 24.11.2005.
SRC in its 181st Meeting held on 20th-21st August, 2009 it was decided that the
institution which have not shifted to the permanent premises even after the
expiry of 3 years time limit be issued notice under section 17 of NCTE Act, for
further action. As per the decision of SRC a notice under Section 17 was issued
to the institution on 16.09.2009. The reply from the institution has not been
received so far.
The Committee considered the matter in its 192nd meeting held on 10th-11th May
2010 and decided to withdraw recognition granted to the institution for B.Ed.
course. Accordingly withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 01.07.2010.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal order, the institution preferred an appeal to NCTEHqrs. The Appellate Authority in its order dated 17.09.2010 reversed SRC’s
order dated 01.07.2010 with the direction to SRC for causing composite
inspection of the own premises of the institution for all the recognised Teacher
Training programme of NCTE, after obtaining a payment of Rs.40000/- from the
institution and for further decision thereafter within 30 days of issue of this order
and thereafter pass appropriate order.
The institution has submitted Rs. 40000/- towards inspection fees. The
committee considered the matter in its 197th meeting held on 13th-14th October
2010 and decided to cause composite inspection.
The institution was also granted recognition to M.Ed course on 11.12.2007 and
D.T.Ed course on 12.08.2005.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was conducted on 24.11.2010.
Composite inspection is conducted for 3 courses. Inspection fee submitted is
RS.40000/- as per Appellate order dated. 0107.2010.
The SRC in its 199th meeting held on 22nd -23rd December, 2010 considered the
VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to
serve Show cause Notice Under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following :





The Built up area earmarked for B.Ed course is 10,000 Sq.ft D.Ed &
D.T.Ed(Al) -24225 Sq.ft, M.Ed – 24225 Sq.ft.The same is also
corroborated by the management in the essential data. The B.Ed
programme requires a built up area of 16,000 sq.ft, as per the
norms.
The management is running in the same complex a college of
Engineering and a college of Nursing courses. .
A Certificate from the Government / Affiliating body to the effect that
no other programme is being run/shared by the institution in the
same building / Campus, along with the existing Course D.T.Ed,
D.T.Ed(Al), B.Ed & M.Ed programmes is to be submitted.
The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent
Government Engineer is not submitted.
The institute has not submitted the approved Building plan from a
competent Govt. authority.
Non- Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government
Authorised person / Authorities to be submitted.
35
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

Duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents
for land, building approval and completion certificate from a
competent Govt. Engineer and others etc., is to be submitted.
Accordingly show cause notice was issued to B.Ed, M.Ed, D.T.Ed course on
01.02.2011. The institution has submitted common reply on 11.03.2011.
The SRC in its 203rd meeting held on 31st March & 01st April, 2011 has decided
to issue Final Show Cause notice to the institution for the following reason under
section 17 of the NCTE Act, after careful consideration of the reply of the
institution dt. 11.03.2011 for the show cause notice issued to the institution on
01.02.2011 for the following:







The Built up area earmarked for B.Ed course is 10,000 Sq.ft D.Ed &
D.T.Ed(Al) -24225 Sq.ft, M.Ed – 24225 Sq.ft.The same is also corroborated
by the management in the essential data. The B.Ed programme requires
a built up area of 16,000 sq.ft, as per the norms.
The management is running in the same complex a college of
Engineering and a college of Nursing courses. .
A Certificate from the Government / Affiliating body to the effect that no
other programme is being run/shared by the institution in the same
building / Campus, along with the existing Course D.T.Ed, D.T.Ed(Al),
B.Ed & M.Ed programmes is to be submitted.
The latest Building Completion Certificate from the competent
Government Engineer is not submitted.
The institute has not submitted the approved Building plan from a
competent Govt. authority.
Non- Encumbrance Certificate from the competent Government
Authorised person / Authorities to be submitted.
Duly filled in Questionnaire along with all the necessary documents for
land, building approval and completion certificate from a competent
Govt. Engineer and others etc., is to be submitted.
Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued dt. 05.05.2011 and 23.05.201,
the institution has submitted the in its reply on 13.07.2011,18.07.2011 and
09.09.2011.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st -23rd September, 2011 considered the
reply of the institution dt. 13.07.2011, 18.07.2011 & 09.09.2011, VT Report, VCD
and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final
Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following:


A certificate from the Affiliating body to the effect that no other
programme is being run/shared by the institution in the same
building/campus, along with the existing Course D.T.Ed, D.T.Edal, B.Ed & M.Ed programme is not submitted.
Sale deed is not in the name of the institution/society.
Accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
17.11.2011. The institution had submitted written representation on 21.02.2012.
The NCTE, Hqrs vide letter dtd. 27.02.2012 had forwarded a complaint dtd.
36
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
22.02.2012 which was received against the institution from Shri T. Vidayapuri,
Tiruvallur District. NCTE, Hqrs has stated that “some allegations have been
made by complainant against the aforesaid institution. You are, therefore,
requested to examine the matter and to take necessary action against the
institution as per the NCTE Act, 1993, by placing the complaint before the
Regional Committee and to furnish action taken to NCTE, Hqrs., New Delhi
within a month”.
The institution had submitted written representation for Final Show Cause Notice
on 21.02.2012
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012 considered the reply of
the institution dt. 30.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it
was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act,
for the following:


Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is
not submitted. Notarised English version of the certified copy land
documents not submitted. Land documents submitted are not in
the name of the Society/institution.
Sy.No. is not matching with sale deed & other land documents &
building plan.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
21.05.2012.The institution had submitted its written representation on
07.06.2012.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th -28th September, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 07.06.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE
Act, for the following:




Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is
not submitted. Notarised English version of the certified copy land
documents not submitted. No land documents are submitted for
Sy.Nos. mentioned in English version if sale deed dt. 15.12.2005.
Further, the English version of land documents attested by Subregistrar, instead of notary attested.
As per building plan, only 2251.38 sq.mtrs built up area is available
for both TTI and Co-education, which is grossly inadequate as per
NCTE norms.
The size of the multipurpose hall is only 1322.5 sq.ft. which is less
than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms.
Course wise staff approval from affiliating body/university is to be
submitted.
Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 29.10.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on 27.11.2012,
27.12.2012 and 30.01.2013.
The SRC in its 239th meeting held on 26th -27th February, 2013 considered the
written representation of the institution vide letter dt. 27.11.2012, 27.12.2012
and30.01.2013 to the final show cause notice issued dt. 29.10.2012, decided
37
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
and advised Southern Regional Committee to resubmit with course wise detailed
note in the 241st meeting, and also to check for land documents carefully.
Further, Final Show Cause Notice was issued for all the courses. Accordingly,
the reply of the institution submitted on 27.11.2012, 27.12.2012 and 30.01.2013
has been analysed.
The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 30th-31st March & 01st April, 2013 and
decided to Withdraw Recognition for M.Ed, D.T.Ed & D.T.Ed-AI and Resubmit
with a proper note on B.Ed.
The Committee considered the VT report, VCD and also the relevant
documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the
following reasons:
The institution was given recognition in the year 2005 (24.11.2005). The
title to the land and building not transferred by the Society to the
institution within 6 months as per NCTE Regulation 2009,
As per 8, 7 (iv) of 2009 regulations, “The society sponsoring the institution
shall be required to transfer and vest the title of the land and building in
the name of the institution within a period of six months from the date of
issue of formal recognition order under sub-regulation (11) of Regulation 7.
However, in case, the society fails to do so due to local laws or rules or
bye-laws, it shall intimate in writing with documentary evidence, of its
inability to do so. The Regional Office shall keep this information on record
and place it before the Regional Committee for its approval”.

The institution has not submitted approved staff list.
 Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in joint account is not submitted.

As per VT report, seating capacity in the library is only for 16 students,
which is inadequate for B.Ed course as per NCTE Regulations 2009
 Encumbrance certificate submitted is not reflecting any transaction in
favour of Society.
 Valid Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by the B.K.R. College of Education, No.
45/22E, Madras Bye Pass Road, Thiruttani-631209, Yjiruvallur District,
Tamilandu, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their
course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
38
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
15.
APS04081
D.Ed
Best Teacher
Training
Institute,
Mayliaduthurai
District
TN
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Best Teacher Education Institute, Peninsula building, 26/54 Mayura Nathar
North Street, Mayiladuthurai-609001, Tamilnadu
Best Teacher Education Institute, Peninsula building, 26/54 Mayura Nathar North
Street, Mayiladuthurai-609001, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for
D.T.Ed Course on 31.12.2004. The institution was granted recognition on
02.09.2006 with an annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own
premises within 3 years.
The Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), Government of India,
based on the inquiry report submitted by Sri. Sathyam, IAS (Retd) had directed
NCTE that all the cases (including this) cleared by SRC in its 116th meeting held
22nd-23rd August, 2006 should be
re-inspected and the maintenance of
Norms and Standards should be verified.
The above institution was one amongst 71 institutions, which was granted
recognition in the 116th meeting. Based on the directions of MHRD, inspection
under Section 17 of the above institution was carried out on 16.12.2008. The VT
report, VCD, original application file along with other documents were placed
before SRC in its 169th meeting held on 12th-13th January on 05.03.2009. The
institution submitted its reply on 05.05.2009. The institution had submitted its
written representation alongwith Rs. 40,000/- towards inspection fee on
01.05.2009.
The institution filed a writ petition No. 8952/2009 in the Hon’ble High Court of
Madras against the SRC letter dated F.SRO/NCTE/2008-09/10562 dt.
05.03.2009. The court granted interim stay. Accordingly, a letter was issued to the
Advocate to vacate the stay.
The SRC in its 180th meeting held on 29th July 2009 considered the reply and
decided to defer the matter and await for outcome of Hon’ble High Court of
Madras in WP. No. 8952/2009, which the management had filed relating to the
inspection of the institution. A letter was sent to the Advocate to inform the
current status of the stay, if any. The Inspection of the institution was fixed
between 30th May to 4th June 2011. The same was intimated to the institution on
24.05.2011. Inspection of the institution was conducted on 30.05.2011. Pending
receipt of information from Advocate VTR is placed before SRC in its 211 th
meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 considered the
VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to
serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause notice
was issued to the institution on 28.11.2011. The institution had submitted its
written representation on 02.01.2012.
The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th-12th January, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution
dt. 01.01.2012, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant
documentary evidences and decided to serve another Show Cause Notice under
Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the
institution on 25.02.2012. The institution had submitted its written representation
on 21.03.2012.
39
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered and the
reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:




Certified copy of the sale deed from competent Govt. authority is
not submitted. Notarised English version of the certified copy land
documents not submitted. Land documents submitted is in
individual name, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.
Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil
authority is not given.
In the building plan submitted, total
earmarked land area is not given.
Original building completion certificate from competent Govt.
authorized engineer is not submitted.
Encumbrance certificate in English version is not submitted.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 223rd
Meeting held on 29th-31st May 2012 decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.T.Ed
course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 25.06.2012.
The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide
order no. F.No.89-507/2012 Appeal/10th Meeting-2012 dtd. 11.12.2012 has
stated as follows:“ after the perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and
after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council
concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted. The case is remanded to
the SRC for further processing subject to production of a Building Completion
Certificate in the prescribed format.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby remands back the case of Best
Teacher Education Institute, Nagapattinam, Tamilnadu to the SRC, NCTE for
necessary action as indicated above
The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 05th-06th January, 2013 considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 11/12/2012 and decided to further process the
application of the institution subject to production of Building Completion
Certificate in the prescribed format.
The institution has submitted Building Completion Certificate on 07.01.2013.
The details for processing has been taken from the appeal forwarded by the
NCTE Hqrs on 13.09.2012. Accordingly, the application has been processed as
per the appeal order and dt. 04.09.2012.
The matter placed before SRC in tis 240th meeting of SRC 09th -11th March, 2012
due to shortage of time deferred the case and the SRC in its 241 st meeting held
40
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
on 30th -31st March & 01st April 2013 and decide to Find out from Advocate
(i)What happened to the Stay & (ii) What is the latest position in the case.
Report in the 242nd Meeting. Minutes not yet finalized.
Accordingly, a letter sent to the advocate on 12.04.2013 to submit and also
requested to defend the case, latest position of the case regarding stay.
16.
APS01350
D.T.Ed
Adhiparasakthi
Teacher
Training
Institute, Vellore
District
TN
The Committee considered the matter and advised Southern Regional
Office to ascertain facts from the Lawyer and report the matter in the next
SRC’s meeting on 30th April, 2013.
Adhiparasakthi Teacher Training Institute, G.B.Nagar, Kalavai, Vellore
District, Pin-632506, Tamilnadu
Adhiparasakthi Teacher Training Institute, G.B.Nagar, Kalavai, Vellore District,
Pin-632506, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for D.T.Ed Course on
26.06.2003. The institution was granted recognition on 08.03.2004 with an
annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3
years.
The inspection of the institution for shifting of premises was conducted on
02.06.2011. The institution is also running B.Ed & M.Ed courses for which
recognitions were granted on 22.11.2005 & 28.05.2008 respectively.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 considered the
VT Report, VCD alongwith all the relevant documentary evidences and decided
to serve Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a
Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 15.11.2011. The institution
had submitted its written representation on 19.12.2011.
The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th-12th January, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution dt. 19.12.2011, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant
documentary evidences and decided to serve Final Show Cause Notice under
Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to
the institution on 25.02.2012.
The institution had submitted its written
representation on 15.02.2012, 23.02.2012 and 19.03.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09th-10th May 2012 considered the
written reply vide letter dt 19.03.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Final Show Cause Notice under Section
17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the
institution on 11.06.2012.
The institution had submitted its written
representation on 29.06.2012.
The SRC in its 229th meeting held on 30th-31st July,2012 considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 29.06.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 29.08.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on 18.09.2012.
The SRC in its 234th meeting held on 17th-18th October, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 18.09.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 27.12.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on 15.01.2013.
41
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The SRC in its 241st meeting held on 30th-31st March & 01st April, 2013 decided
to Put up all the details in the standard format in the next meeting.
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
As per building completion certificate dt. 10.04.2009 handed over to VT
members the building is located at Sy.Nos. 531/2, 530/5, 530/7,8,9,10,11,
whereas, as per building completion certificate dt. 26.12.2005 submitted
with reply to show cause notice dt. 15.11.2011, the building is located at
Sy.No. 529/8, 529/10 and 529/11. Further, in reply to Final show cause
notice dt. 25.02.2012, the institution has submitted another building
completion certificate dt. 10.04.2012 stating the location of building at
Sy.No. 530/2.

The institution was asked to submit certified copy of gift deed dt.
25.04.2008, however, they have now stated that “our institution is located
in the sy.No. 528/9 with an area of 2.91 Acres”. This is a new Sy.No. which
has come into the picture for the very first time. No documents have been
submitted for this new Sy.Nos.
The reply submitted by the institution to the above queries, has not given
proper genuine reasons. The deficiencies have remained even after
several show cause notices
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the D.T.Ed course run by the Adhiparasakthi Teacher
Training Institute, G.B. Nagar, Kalavai, Vellore District, Pin-632 506,
Tamilnaud from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing
batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
17
APS04264
M.Ed
Mount Tabor
Training
College,
Kollam, Kerala
KL
Mount Tabor Training College, Pathanapuram-689695, Kollam, Kerala.
Mount Tabor Training College, Pathanapuram-689695, Kollam, Kerala was
granted recognition for M.Ed. course with an intake of 25 students from the
session 2005-2006 vide order No.2518 dated 26.8.2005. The intake was
enhanced to 35 students vide this office order dated 27.8.2010 upon the
directions from NCTE, HQ dated 30th July, 2010.
Mount Tabor Training College, Pathanpuram, Quilon-689695, Kerala(Code no.
APS0355) was granted year-wise recognition for B.Ed. course with conditions,
continuation of recognition subject to submission of compliance report.
SRC-NCTE granted conditional recognition for one year only for the academic
42
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
session 1999-2000 to Mount Tabor Training College, Pathanapuram, Quilon
District, Kerala to B.Ed course of one year duration on 23.6.1999.
It was observed by the SRC in its 176th meeting held on 27–28 May, 2009, that
the recognition was granted to the institution subject to submission of
compliance report by 31.12.1999. The compliance report was not received by
the office and continuation of recognition was not obtained. Hence, the SRC
decided to send the Questionnaire and obtain infrastructural and instructional
facilities available in the college. Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution
to submit the filled in Questionnaire on 6.7.2009. The institution submitted its
reply along with filled in Questionnaire on 31.07.2009.
SRC considered the Questionnaire submitted by the institution and decided to
cause inspection after payment of Rs.40,000/- within a period of four weeks from
the date of confirmation of the Minutes.
As per direction of Regional Committee, a letter was sent to applicant institution
on 09.02.2010 with request to submit inspection fee of Rs 40,000/- .
In
response to this Office letter dated 09.02.2010 the institution submitted a
representation along with inspection fee of Rs. 40,000/-. The inspection was
caused to the institution on 03.06.2010.
The SRC in its 193rd meeting held on 21-22 June, 2010 considered the VT report
of the institution, VCD and other related documents along with the original file of
the institution and decided to continue the recognition of the institution to offer
B.Ed. Course with restriction to two units of 100 each, thus making a total intake
of 200, commensurate to the available built-up area as per the norms.
Also, the SRC in its 193rd meeting of SRC also decided to serve Notice under
Section 17 of NCTE Act to the institution for offering M.Ed. course for the
following deficiencies: The total built-up area earmarked for M.Ed. course is only 3186sq.ft. which is
far less than the NCTE norm of 16,000 sq.ft.
Hence, a letter continuing recognition to the institution for the B.Ed. course
with an intake of 200 ( 2 units of 100 each) was issued on 2.8.2010 vide
No.20172 and a notice was served to the institution for offering M.Ed.
course was served on 2.8.2010 vide letter No.20173.
A letter of NCTE, HQ was received by this office on 17.9.2010 along with a
representation of the institution dated 16.8.2010 addressed to the Chairperson,
NCTE, New Delhi to submit action taken. In reply, this office had addressed a
letter to the Member Secretary on 23.9.2010 along with the letter addressed to
the institution for continuation of recognition to the B.Ed. course and Notice for
M.Ed. course.
Again, a letter was received from the NCTE, HQ on 24.10.2011 forwarding
representations/ references recd. from the different teacher training
institutions/individuals. NCTE, HQ had forwarded letters of the institution
43
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
requesting for increase of the student strength from 200 to 220 addressed to the
Chairperson, NCTE dated 16.8.2010 and 11.7.2011 to furnish a reply to the
institution.
The reply to the Notice for offering M.Ed. course was not yet received from the
institution so far and the matter was placed before 217th Meeting of SRC.
The SRC in its 217th meeting held on 08th –09th February, 2012 considered the
matter, VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and
decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
15.03.2012. The institution had submitted its written representation on
09.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting of SRC held on 9th and 10th May, 2012 considered
the written reply of the institution to the Final Show Cause Notice issued and
also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw
recognition for the following reasons: Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil
authority with all details towards B.Ed and M.Ed course running, is not
submitted.
 The total built up area earmarked for M.Ed progrmme is only 3186 sq. ft.
which is grossly inadequate for the programme as per NCTE norms. The
institution has failed to earmark built up area of 500 sq. mtrs. for M.Ed.
programme.
 The institution has not submitted/ failed to give documentary proof for
construction of additional built up area for M.Ed course and earmarked
built up area separately for both B.Ed and M.Ed programmes.
Further, the institution did not submit Building plan, building completion
certificate and land usage certificate for the additional construction of built
up area. Reply of the institution is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Based on the above points the SRC decided to withdraw the recognition of the
M.Ed (APS04264) course run by the Mount Tabor Training College,
Pathanapuram, Kollam, Kerala from the academic year 2012-13, in order to
enable the ongoing batch of students in M.Ed course, if any, to complete their
course.
It was made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order. The Affiliating body /
Examining board / body be informed accordingly. Further decided to return
Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if
any.
Accordingly, a Withdrawal Order was issued to the institution Vide
No.APS04264 /M.Ed /KL/ 2012-13/42249 dated 08.06.2012.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal order, the institution filed a Writ Petition No. 17393
in the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala and an appeal before the National Council
for Teacher Education (Appeal No.323/27.06.2012).The hon’ble High Court of
Kerala in its Judgement dated 25th July 2012 stated that “ the appeal Exhibit P7
44
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
will be disposed of by appellate authority, after notice to the petitioner(The
management, Mount Tabor Training College), within a period of three months.”
The appellate authority in its order F.No. 89-342/2012 Appeal/8th Meeting –
2012 dated 05/09/2012 stated that
“ The council concluded that there was adequate justification to accept the
appeal and remand the case to SRC for causing fresh inspection of the
institution after obtaining payment of Rs. 40,000/- from the institution and
for taking further decision thereafter.
The Council hereby remands back the case of Mount Tabor Training
College, Pathanapuram, Kerala to SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as
indicated above.”
The appellate authority order was placed before 233rd meeting of SRC held on
26th – 28th September 2012 and the Committee decided to further process the
application.
Accordingly, the institution was asked to submit Rs.50,000/- inspection fee vide
this office letter No.F.SRO/APSO 4264/M.Ed/2012/47216 dated 14/11/2012.The
institution submitted the inspection fee of Rs.50,000/- on 22/11/2012.
The inspection of the institution was scheduled for 15th – 20th February, 2012 and
the same was intimated to the institution vide this office letter F.No.APSO
4264/M.Ed/KL/2013-14/49047 dated 11/02/2012..
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was carried out on 19.02.2013
The Committee considered the VT report, VCD and also the relevant
documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the
following reasons: The land is in the name of Thomas Kathanur, S/o Mathen, Prest, resident
of St. Stephen’s English School Compound, School Manager and owner.
The land is not in the name of Society/Institution as per NCTE regulations
2009.
 As per the copy of building completion certificate submitted, the owner of
the land is Society of the Order of Sacred Transfiguration. But as per
land usage certificate submitted, the owner of the land is his grace Mar
Thoma Dionysius Metorpolitan.
 In the Copy of the building plan submitted to the appellate authority, the
location of the building, Sy.No. and land area is not mentioned. The built
up area of 1904.23 sq.mtrs is mentioned.
 Approved building plan issued by competent civil authority is not
submitted.
 Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is
not submitted.
 Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
45
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
submitted.
 Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in joint Account is not given. Fixed deposit
submitted is for only 3 years duration instead of 5 years.
 The Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in the prescribed format with
notary attestation to be submitted.
 As per VT report, the land contained Schools and College. NO separate
land document for B.Ed and M.Ed nor there is earmarked building plan.
As per Para 7(ii) of NCTE regulations 2009, the teacher education
institution shall not be allowed to have any other institution within its
demarcated area or building and shall not have any other courses(s) in its
building.
 The institution has not submitted approved staff list, duly approved by
the affiliating body/University.
 As per VT, report,
Built up area for M.Ed courses is not
mentioned/provided and only for B.Ed course is given, which is only
10859 sq.ft for 200 students.
 As per VT report, Multipurpose Hall size is only 1364 sq.ft, which is less
than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms, 2009.
 As per VT report, seating capacity in the library is only 50, which is less
than requirement as per NCTE norms. Since the institution running B.Ed
with 200 intake and M.Ed course, for both the courses the seating
capacity is insufficient.
 As per VT report, the management is not in possession of original
document evidence for running the course in the land and building. The
institution is not prepared for the inspection to show the original
certificates of the staff and other documents.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the M.Ed course run by the Mount tabor Training College,
Pathanapuram-689695, Kollam, Kerala from the academic year 2013-14,
in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in M.Ed, course, if any,
to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Further,
The committee decided with reference to the information
46
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
collected, advised Southern Regional Office to reopen the B.Ed
case and process and put up.
18
APS08997
M.Ed
Kittoor Rani
Chennamma
PG College,
Belgaum
District
KA
.
Kittoor Rani Chennamma PG College, Belgaum, Karnataka
Kittoor Rani Chennamma PG College, Belgaum, Karnataka had submitted an
application for starting of M.Ed. course on 11.9.2007.
After submission of essential documents, inspection was conducted on
31.07.2008. The VT report and all other related documents were placed before
162nd meeting of SRC held on 20-21 August, 2008 and it was decided to issue
Letter of Intent/Conditional recognition.
The letter of intent was sent to the institution on 18.09.2008.
Even after the lapse of stipulated time, the institution had not submitted any reply
and the matter was placed before 171st meeting of SRC held during 16-17 March
2009 which has decided to issue a Notice and Notice was served to the
institution on 24.3.2009 to submit the documents before 10th April, 2009.

The institution submitted its reply on 28.4.2009.
The matter was placed before 174th meeting of SRC held during 1.5. 2009
wherein it was decided to issue Notice. Again, a letter was sent on 9.6.2009 to
submit the documents within 19.6.2009 and a reminder letter was sent on
2.7.2009 to submit the documents within 10th July, 2009.

The institution submitted representation on 22.7.2009 stating that the
Vice-Chancellor of Karnatak University, Dharwad is making appointment
of teaching staff as per norms.
The matter was placed before 179th meeting of SRC held on 23rd July, 2009
wherein it was decided to serve Notice and Notice was served to the institution
on 24.7.2009.
Since the institution did not submit any reply, the matter was once again
placed before 180th meeting held on 29th July, 2009 wherein it was decided to
permit the institution to submit the reply by 17.8.2009 and a final reminder was
sent on 31.7.2009.

The institution submitted its representation on 30th July, 2009 and
11.8.2009.
The reply was considered by SRC in its 181st meeting held during 20-21 August,
2009 wherein it was decided to serve Notice to submit reply by 28th August, 2009
and notice was issued to the institution on 24.8.2009.
The institution did not submit any reply even after expiry of stipulated
period and hence the matter was placed before SRC in its 182nd meeting held
on 31st August, 2009 which came to the conclusion to
refuse the
recognition/withdraw the Letter of Intent OR Conditional Recognition
accorded to the institution for the proposed course as per Section 14(3)(b)
47
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
of NCTE Act for the following reasons: The institution has not appointed requisite faculty/staff and also not
submitted the staff list and affidavits as per regulations 7(9) of NCTE.
Accordingly, refusal order was issued to the institution vide Order No.
F.SRO/NCTE/2008-2009/15844 dated 24.09.2009. Aggrieved by the refusal
order the institution preferred an appeal before the appellate authority on
13.09.2011.
The Appellate authority on 8-12-2011 noted that a) Karnataka University
submitted an application to the SRC for grant of recognition of Kittur Rani
Channamma P.G. Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka for M.Ed. course. SRC vide letter
dated 18-09-2008 issued a letter of intent prior to grant of recognition under
Clause 7(9) of NCTE Regulations. Thereafter it issued a notice, for which the
administrator of Karnataka University submitted a reply on 28-07-2009 stating
that “the University is in the process of appointing qualified staff to teach M.Ed.
students.
In the meanwhile, some qualified and permanent teaching staff has been
transferred from Dharwad to Belgaum”. Despite this reply, SRC decided to
refuse recognition on the grounds as stated in Para 1 above. (b) The Council
further noted Kittur Rani Channamma P.G. Centre, Belgaum was upgraded to
the status of an independent University under the name “Rani Channamma
University”, Belgaum from 2010 onwards. The Rani Channamma University,
being the successor institute of the earlier P.G. Centre, pursued the matter of
M.Ed. recognition and filed an appeal. The delay caused in filing the appeal was
due to upgradation of PG centre into university, which was a valid reason for
condoning the delay caused in preferring the appeal. (c) The university had
taken steps to appoint full complement of the faculty for teaching M.Ed. students.
The Appellate authority therefore came to the conclusion that there was
adequate justification in accepting the appeal with a direction to the SRC for
considering the faculty profile of the institution and for taking further decision
thereafter. The institution is advised to forward a complete set of faculty profile
as required under NCTE Norms, for consideration of SRC.
After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit, VT report and
after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council
reached the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal
and reverse the SRC’s order dated 24-09-2009 vide appellate authority
order No.89-361/2011 Appeal/8th Meeting/2011/A46189 dated 04/01/2012
with a direction to the SRC for considering the faculty profile of the
institution and for taking further decision thereafter. The institution is
advised to forward a complete set of faculty profile as required under
NCTE Norms, for consideration of SRC.

The institution had not submitted Faculty profile to this office
so far(as advised in the appeal order). The appeal committee advised the
University to forward reply to the show cause notice of SRC for consideration
vide its order dt. 04.01.2012.
The SRC in its 217th meeting held on 8-9 February, 2012 considered the
48
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Appellate authority order dated 04.01.2012 decided to await for the reply
from the institution till 45 days and then process the reply of the institution
to the Show Cause Notice for further action.
 But, so far, faculty profile is not received and no reply in this regard is
received from the institution.
Hence, as per the decision of 217th meeting of SRC and since 45 days is
over and faculty profile is not received from the institution, the matter is
once again placed before SRC for its consideration and decision.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19-20 April, 2012 considered the
matter and decided to close the file of M.Ed (APS08997) course applied by
Kittoor Rani Chennamma PG College, Belgaum District, Karnataka for the
time being, as the institution is yet to submit the faculty profile.
In the meanwhile, on 11.5.2012, a fax is received from the Registrar, Rani
Chennamma University, Vidyasangama, NH-4, PBNH, Belgavi-591156 regarding
the starting of M.Ed. programme in the newly started Rani Chennamma
University, Belagavi, Karnataka.

The Registrar had stated that as per Karnataka State University Act, 2000,
Rani Chennamma University Statutes for the recruitment of the teachers and
the guidelines issued by the UGC and NCTE. As per the Act, the Chancellor
of the University has to nominate experts in the selection committee and now
the Governor has nominated the experts, the process of recruitment will start
before the commencement of the next academic year 2012-2013(July, 2012).
The entire recruitment process will be completed and the information to this
effect will be communicated to you. Further, the Library and other facilities
as per NCTE norms are being created.

On 13.8.2012, a letter is received from the Registrar, Rani Chennamma
University, Belgavi, Karnataka regarding revival of M.Ed. programme in the
newly started Rani Chennamma University(copy enclosed). The Registrar
had stated that he has selected One Professor, 2 Associate Professor and 3
Assistant professor have joined the University in the month of July, 2012.
Copies of the office order issued to the selected candidates is produced as
documentary proof. Joining report of the staff is not produced. List of nonteaching staff is also not produced.
The SRC in its 230th meeting held on 16th and 17th July, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences wherein it
was decided to serve Notice Under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a
Notice was issued to the institution on 30/08/2012 for the following: The institution has not submitted staff profile in prescribed format as
per NCTE norms.
The institution submitted its reply by fax message on 31/08/2012.
The SRC in its 232nd meeting held on 29th – 31st August, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences wherein it
was decided to serve Notice Under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Notice was
issued to the institution on 24/09/2012 for the following: Associate Professor is not having the prescribed qualification for the
49
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
post as per NCTE norms.
The institution submitted replies vide letter dated 01/10/2012 and 16.10.2012.
The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 21-22 November, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences wherein it was
decided to serve Notice Under NCTE Act and Notice was issued on 31.12.2012.
Notice issued to the institution is returned back on 07.01.2013.
In the meanwhile, on 3.1.2013(on going through the website), the Registrar
submitted reply to the deficiencies pointed out
The Chairman’s Remarks: In 242nd meeting
“In the context of discussion relating to Rani Chennamma PG College,
Belgaum District, Karnataka, a point was raised about Prof. Lalithamma, a
Member of the Southern Regional Committee, having been a member of
the selection committee for Faculty in the Rani Chennamma PG
College/University. It was suggested that it would be appropriate for Prof.
Lalithamma to withdraw from the deliberations to avoid any issue of
conflict of interest. Prof. Lalithamma was firmly of the view that there was
no question of clash of interest and that it would be inappropriate to
require her to recuse. But, the other members of the Southern Regional
Committee attending the meeting were definitley in favour of her
withdrawal especially for facilitating free and frank expression of views of
all. Accordingly, Pro. Lalithamma left the meeting and withdrew from
participation in the deliberations on this item”.
-----------------------The Committee considered the matter, reply of the institution dt. 03.01.2013
and advised Southern Regional Office to write to University for justification
of the appointment ot Dr. Maruthi Rao. Nimbalkar a superannuated faculty.
19
APS07938 /
SRCAPP1598
B.Ed/ D.El.Ed
LNR College of
Education,
Mahabubnagar
District
AP
Motati Nagi Reddy Memorial Educational Society, Mahabubnagar- 509 126,
Andhra Pradesh had submitted two applications for B.Ed course
(APS07938) on 13.01.2006 and D.El.Ed course(SRCAPP1598) on 30.09.2011
(The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th-17th December 2013, advised SRO to
read both the cases carefully and put up a clearer note for consideration in the
meeting)
As per the decision of SRC, the details of the institution is as follows
APS07938(B.Ed)
SRCAPP1598 (D.El.Ed)
Motati Nagi Reddy Memorial Educational
Society, 45, Paipad Village and Post,
Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar509 126, Andhra Pradesh has submitted in the
Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant
of recognition to LNR College of Education,
H.No. 5-45, Paipad village and Post,
Motati
Nagi
Reddy
Memorial
Educational
Society, Plot No. 1-4-3,
Bheem Nagar, Gadwal
Village and Post, Gadwal
City
and
Taluk,
Mahbubnagar District –
50
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Waddepally Mandal, Alampur, Mahabubnagar- 509125, Andhra Pradesh
509 126, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course on had applied for grant of
13.01.2006.
recognition to Lakshmi
Nagi Reddy College of
Application of the Institution was processed and Diploma in Elementary
deficiency letter dt.17.02.07 was sent to the Education, Plot/Khasara
Institution
communicating
therewith
the No. 181/A, Rama Temple
deficiencies and directing therewith for removal of Street, Shanthi Nagar
the same within 90 days from the date of issue of Road, Waddepally City
deficiency letter. The institution had not replied to and Post, Alampur Taluk,
the deficiency letter even expiry of stipulated Mahbubnagar District –
period of 90 days. The matter of all such 509144, Andhra Pradesh
institutions was considered by the SRC in its for D.EL.Ed Course of two
135th meeting held on 7th and 9th June 2007 after years
duration
under
careful consideration of all the aspects vis-avis Section 14(1) of the
regulatory provisions, the SRC decided to close NCTE Act, 1993 to the
the file and communicate the applicant institution Southern
Regional
to this effect.
Committee, NCTE online
on
30.09.2011
and
Accordingly, a letter dt.12.07.07 was sent to the physical copy received on
Institution intimating about the directions of SRC 03.10.2011.
that the application submitted for grant of teacher
education course has been treated incomplete, The
application
was
therefore the same is closed and that no further scrutinized and a copy of
correspondence whatsoever will be entertained in application was sent to
this regard. However, to seek recognition for any State Government for
teacher education course including the one which recommendation
on
this application was submitted, they were advised 21.12.2011 followed by
to make fresh application in the prescribed reminder on 04.01.2012.
format.
A deficiency letter was
issued to the institution on
LNR College of Education, Mahabubnagar- 509 29.12.2011
and
the
126, Andhra Pradesh has filed a court case in institution has replied to
Writ petition No. 3765 of 2011 in the Hon’ble the deficiency letter on
High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at 22.02.2012
Hyderabad verses – The Government of Andhra
Pradesh, SRC and NCTE-SRC as first and The SRC in its 219th
second respondents respectively against the meeting held on 15th-16th
above SRC order dt.12.07.2007. The Hon’ ble March 2012 considered
High Court has passed an order as under:
the written reply of the
institution vide letter dt.
“The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of 22.02.2012 and other
the respondents is not conducting the relevant documents and
inspection and not granting recognition for decided
to
cause
establishment of the College of Education at inspection to examine
Paipad
Village,
Wadepally
Mandal, whether the institution
Mahaboobnagar District. It is the case of the fulfils all the requirements
petitioners that they filed an application for as per the norms, for the
setting up B.Ed College at Palpad village on proposed
programme,
29.12.2006.Howeve the same was returned on subject to the production
the ground that numerous deficiencies were of complete set of certified
found in the said college. The petitioner, after copies
of
land
removing the said deficiencies, filed a fresh documents/records with
51
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
application on 28.12.2007. The grievance of
the petitioner is that the said application is not
being considered by the respondents till date.
The petitioner has also submitted a
representation on 18.11.2010 before the 2nd
Respondent, but the same has not been
considered as yet. After hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, this writ petition is
disposed of with a direction to the 2nd
respondent to consider the representation dt.
18.11.201 because the petitioner has filed its
earlier application on 29.12.2006 i.e prior to
coming into force of the policy decision
07.01.2009. The respondents are directed to
consider the application of the petitioner,
expeditiously, preferably, within eight weeks
from the date of receipt of a certified copy of
this order. No order as to costs”.
The Court order along with file was placed before
SRC in its 206th Meeting of SRC held on 09th 10th June, 2011.
The Institution has stated to have filed a
representation dt. 18.11.10 wherein it is
mentioned that fresh application is resubmitted on
28.12.2007 clearing deficiencies communicated
on 17.02.2007. This resubmission of fresh
application is well after closure of the case vide
letter dt.12.07.07 for non compliance of
deficiencies with stipulated time as per NCTE
regulations
the condition that the
deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the
institution, under Section
14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly,
the
inspection
of
the
institution
was
fixed
between 12th –15th April
2012, the same was
intimated to the institution
on
31.03.2012.
The
inspection
of
the
institution was conducted
on 13.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd
meeting held on 09th –10th
May 2012 considered the
VT Report, VCD and all
the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to
serve Show Cause Notice
under Section 14 (1) of
NCTE Act.
Accordingly,
a
show
cause notice was issued
to the institution on
13.06.2012.
The
institution has submitted
its written representation
The Committee considered the matter and on 13.06.2012.
decided to process the application on submission
of copy of original application dt. 28.12.2007 and The SRC in its 227th
related supporting original documents as per the meeting held on 17th-19th
regulations.
July,
2012
after
thoroughly considered the
As per decision of SRC a letter was issued to the matter and decided to get
institution to resubmit the application on an affidavit for withdrawal
06.07.2011.
of LOI from the institution
for B.Ed programme and
The institution has submitted a letter enclosing then issue LOI to D.El.Ed
application along with documents on 13.07.2011 course.
earlier submitted application vide dated
28.12.2007.
Accordingly, LOI was
issued to the institution on
The SRC in its 210th meeting considered the 24.07.2012.
The
matter and it was decided to serve Show cause institution has submitted
Notice for the following:
LOI written representation
on 06.08.2012.
 The sale deed of the land was registered
52
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013


on 10/05/2007, whereas the application
submitted
by
the
institution
for
consideration of recognition to B.Ed
course was on 13/01/2006. As per the
NCTE norms and Regulations, land
should be available in the name of the
institution/trust before the date of
application.
Building completion certificate from
competent Govt Engineer is not
submitted.
Up to date Encumbrance certificate not
submitted.
Accordingly, a show cause notice issued to the
institution on 02.11.2011. The institution has
submitted its reply on 17.11.2011.
The SRC in its 215th meeting held on 12-13th
December, 2011 considered the reply of the
institution dt, 17.11.2011 and all the relevant
documents by the institution and decided to
cause inspection at the premises, on payment of
Rs. 40,000/- towards inspection fee, to examine
whether the institution fulfills all the requirement
as per the norms, to the condition that the
deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, as per the norms.
The list of staff are signed
as
possessing
qualification by Director
SCERT,
Hyderabad,
Andhra Pradesh. As per
possessing observed by
the Director, SCERT,
Hyderabad,
Andhra
Pradesh
The SRC in its 230th
meeting held on 16th –
17th
August
2012,
decided that Formal
Recognition be granted
to D.El.Ed., course of
two year duration with
an annual intake of 50
(Fifty only) students
students
from
the
session 2012-2013.
Accordingly,
formal
recognition order was
issued to the institution
on 05.09.2012
Note: As per record, the institution has not
submitted inspection fee of Rs.40,000/As per the direction SRC inspection of the
institution was carried out on 03.02.2012.
The SRC in its 219th Meeting held on 15th – 16th
March, 2012 considered the VT report, VCD and
all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under
Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for the following:




As per VT report, total built up area is only
5870 sq.ft. Which is grossly inadequate as
per NCTE norms. 16000 sq.ft. of built up
area is required for the proposed course.
As per VT report, the size of multipurpose
hall is 1280.92 sq.ft. which is less than NCTE
norms. As per NCTE norms, 2000 sq.ft. is
required.
In the approved building plan the survey
number and site area is not mentioned.
From VCD, it appears that a school is being
run in the same building/premises.
53
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013



As per VCD, full view of the building is not
shown, the construction of the building is still
in progress, and the total built up area
appears to be less than 16000 sq.ft.
Furniture provided in the class room/Hall /
labs/ Principal room and staff room are
inadequate. Needs to be strengthened.
Science lab, Psychology lab & ET lab needs
to be strengthened.
As per decision of SRC show cause notice issued
on 11.04.2012, the institution has replied on
30.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 9th-10th May
2012, considered the reply of the institution and
all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under
section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

As per VTR, the size of the multipurpose hall
is only 1280.92 sq,fts. Which less than the
requirement of 2000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms.
The institution submitted its written representation
on 13.06.2012(with reference to the minutes of
222nd meeting of SRC NCTE website).
The institution was placed before Southern
Regional Committee in its meeting 225th meeting
held on 25th-27th June 2012, decided to issue
letter of intent prior to recognition for the
academic year 2012-13.
Accordingly, letter of intent was issued to
applicant institution on 02.07.2012. The institution
has submitted reply on 06.07.2012.
The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th – 25th
July 2012 considered the reply of the institution
and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Notice Under section 14
(1) of NCTE Act for the following:

The institution has not appointed Lecturer in
Art Education and Physical Education as per
NCTE norms 2009.
Accordingly, LETTER OF INTENT notice was
issued to the institution on 13.08.2012. The
institution has submitted its written representation
on 06.09.2012 after the stipulated time of 21 days
i.e., 3 days late.
54
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The institution has submitted a letter dated
17.07.2012 stating “that the situation
prevailing in Andhra region is for D.El.Ed
course and admission of students for B.Ed
course is not favorable and students are
opting for D.El.Ed courses, considering the
prevailing situation I would like to withdraw
the LOI issued to the B.Ed course and I
request your good office to kindly give me
permission to opt for D.El.Ed course in place
of B.Ed course for which already LOI issued.
Since formal recognition is not yet issued for
B.Ed course, the application for D.El.Ed
course (SRCAPP1598) is applied in the
session of 2012-13 and is in process. In this
present situation, I request your good office to
kindly issue LOI for D.El.Ed course in place of
B.Ed (SRCAPP1598) course, which will help
me to run D.El.Ed course in conductive
atmosphere”.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th
September 2012, considered the affidavit and the
Committee decided to withdraw of LETTER OF
INTENT issued to the institution for B.Ed course
(APS07938) is permitted to withdraw.
Accordingly, withdrawal of rejection order was
issued to the institution on 30.10.2012.
The institution moved to Hon’ble High Court of
Judicature at Andhra Pradesh dtd. 27.11.2012 in
W.P. No. 34518 of 2012 which reads as under:“…….. On the application of the Motati Nagi
Reddy Memorial Educational Society for grant
of recognition under NCTE Act, 1993, the
NCTE has already issued Letter of intent on
02.07.2012.
Therefore, the impugned
resolution
was
passed
rejecting
the
application of Motati Nagi Reddy Memorial
Educational Society, on the ground that the
earlier application of the society was allowed
to be withdrawn.
On instruction, it is submitted by the learned
counsel appearing for the National Council for
Teacher Education that the respondent i.e.,
NCTE would reconsider the matter and the
Southern Regional Committee is likely to meet
on 16.12.2012 and 17.12.2012.
55
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Inasmuch as the Letter of Intent is already
issued to the institution, a perusal of which
indicate that the institution have already
satisfied the criteria which is required for
establishing a B.Ed College, prima facie, it
appears that the impugned proceedings is not
sustainable.
Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the
respondent to reconsider the application of
the institution in the next committee meeting,
which is stated to be held on 16.12.2012 and
17.12.2012.
In case, if any meeting is
convened earlier to those dates, the same
shall be placed in such meeting and
appropriate decision shall be taken”.
The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th-17th
December 2012, considered the matter and
decided that the LOI for B.Ed was closed with
reference to the applicant’s affidavit of July 2012
withdrawing his application for B.Ed. The SRC
decision earlier taken was correct. The Closure
has been communicated to the party. Noting
more needs to be done at this stage. The B.Ed
case cannot be reopened now.
The applicant wants only his D.Ed application to
be pursued. This also has already been done.
Formal Recognition for D.Ed has also issued.
Nothing more needs to be done at this stage.
It is unfortunate that, not withstanding his own
affidavit for withdrawal of his application of B.Ed,
the applicant should have agitated this issue in
the court in this inappropriate manner. If he
approaches the court again in this matter, the
court should be appraised of these facts and
requested to consider action against him for
misleading the court.
Further, the committee advised SRO to read
both the cases carefully and put up a clearer
note for consideration in the meeting on
18.12.2012.
It is observed from the application file (APS07938 B.Ed course) as per the
institution affidavit dated 17.07.2012 requested to withdraw LETTER OF INTENT
for B.Ed course i.e. APS07938 and issue LETTER OF INTENT for D.El.Ed
course. Already Formal Recognition order was issued to the institution for
D.El.Ed course on 05.09.2012.
As per the request of the institution and as per the decision of SRC in its 233rd
56
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Meeting held on 27th-28th September, 2012 the committee considered the
affidavit of the institution dated 17/07/2012 and decided to withdraw of Letter of
Intent. (APS07938-B.Ed).
Accordingly, withdraw of Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on
30/10/2012.
The action taken by SRC in its 236th meeting is stands correct.
The institution moved to Court in W.P.No.34518 of 2012, the direction of the
Hon’ble Court is not correct. The institution is misleading the Court.
As per the NCTE Regulation 2009 para 8 sub para 3 stating as follows:- “An
institution can apply for one basic unit only of an additional course or for an
additional unit of the existing recognized course after completion of three
academic sessions of the respective course.”
The D.Ed course was recognized on 05.09.2012. Hence the institution is not
completed the three academic sessions.
The Committee considered the matter and decided that, the institution has
already been given recognition for D.El.Ed course on 05-09-2012 in place of
B.Ed course (APS07938) in view of, institution request for withdrawal of
LOI issued to B.Ed course.
When the application of B.Ed course of the said institution was under
process, the institution has submitted a letter dated 17.07.2012 stating
“that the situation prevailing in Andhra region is for D.El.Ed course and
admission of students for B.Ed course is not favorable and students are
opting for the D.El.Ed courses, considering the prevailing situation I would
like to withdraw the LOI issued to the B.Ed course for which already LOI
issued. Since formal recognition is not yet issued for B.Ed course, the
application for D.El.Ed course (SRCAPP1598) is applied in the session of
2012-13 and is in process. In this present situation, I request your good
office to kindly issue LOI for D.El.Ed course in place of B.Ed
(SRCAPP1598) course, which will help me to run D.El.Ed course in
conductive atmosphere”.
Accordingly, based on affidavit submitted by the institution for withdrawal
of LOI issued to the institution for B.Ed course, the SRC considered the
written representation of the institution vide letter dt. 17-07-2012 for
withdrawal of LOI issued to the institution’s B.Ed course (APS07938) was
permitted to withdraw.
Further, with reference to the totality of information collected & based on a
collective application of mind, the Committee decided as per clause of
NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the
institution for recognition of B.Ed course (APS07938).
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 30.10.2012.
The institution moved to Hon’ble High Court of Judicature at Andhra
Pradesh dtd. 27.11.2012 in W.P. No. 34518 of 2012 which reads as under:57
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
“…….. On the application of the Motati Nagi Reddy Memorial Educational
Society for grant of recognition under NCTE Act, 1993, the NCTE has
already issued Letter of intent on 02.07.2012. Therefore, the impugned
resolution was passed rejecting the application of Motati Nagi Reddy
Memorial Educational Society, on the ground that the earlier application of
the society was allowed to be withdrawn.
On instruction, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the
National Council for Teacher Education that the respondent i.e., NCTE
would reconsider the matter and the Southern Regional Committee is likely
to meet on 16.12.2012 and 17.12.2012.
Inasmuch as the Letter of Intent is already issued to the institution, a
perusal of which indicate that the institution have already satisfied the
criteria which is required for establishing a B.Ed College, prima facie, it
appears that the impugned proceedings is not sustainable.
Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the respondent to reconsider the
application of the institution in the next committee meeting, which is stated
to be held on 16.12.2012 and 17.12.2012. In case, if any meeting is
convened earlier to those dates, the same shall be placed in such meeting
and appropriate decision shall be taken”.
The committee considered the matter and decided that the LOI for B.Ed
was closed with reference to the applicant’s affidavit of July 2012
withdrawing his application for B.Ed. The SRC decision earlier taken was
correct. The Closure has been communicated to the party. Nothing more
needs to be done at this state. The B.Ed case cannot be reopened now.
The applicant wants only his D.Ed application to be pursued. This also has
already been done. Formal Recognition for D.Ed has also issued. Nothing
more needs to be done at this stage.
It is unfortunate that, not withstanding his own affidavit for withdrawal of
his application of B.Ed, the applicant should have agitated this issue in the
court in this inappropriate manner. If he approaches the court again in this
matter, the court should be appraised of these facts and requested to
consider action against him for misleading the court.
Now, the question of consideration of B.Ed application for recognition
does not arise, as per NCTE regulations 2009, para 8 sub para 3 states as
follows: “An institution can apply for one basic unit only of an additional
course or for an additional unit of the existing recognized course after
completion of three academic sessions of the respective course for which
the institution shall submit application before the cut off date prescribed
for submission of applications in the year succeeding the completion of
three academic sessions”.
Further, the committee decided that, the question of considering
recognition for B.Ed again will arise only in Sept 2015. No action is
necessary now.
58
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
20
SRCAPP680
D.El.Ed
Vagdevi
College of
Education,
Vizianagaram
District
AP
Vagdevi
College
of
Education,
Khasra
No.
25/7,Plot
41/1A,Thumukapalli Gate Post, Kothavalasa Taluka and
Vizianagaram – 535183, Andhra Pradesh.
No.8Town,
Vagdevi Educational Society, Plot No. 8-41/1A, Jagannadha Layout,
Kothavalasa Village and Post, Vizianagaram 535183, Andhra Pradesh had
applied for grant of recognition to Vagdevi College of Education, Khasra No.
25/7,Plot No.8- 41/1A,Thumukapalli Gate Post, Kothavalasa Taluka and Town,
Vizianagaram – 535183,Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course of two years
duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 25.09.2011 and physical application has been
received in the office of SRC on 28.09.2011.
The establishment of a National Council for Teacher Education with a view of
achieving planned and co-ordinate development of the teacher education system
throughout the country and the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and
standards in the teacher education system.
As per regulation 2009, stated that the applicant institution shall ensure on-line
submission of applications complete in all respects along with hard copy of the
application and other documents (copy enclosed)
Several institutions have submitted application for change of course from the one
mentioned in on-line application. In similar matters, NCTE HQ has directed that it
is mandatory for the teacher educational institution to apply online for recognition
of a teacher education course. Therefore, if the institution has mentioned that a
particular course in on-line application the same course should be considered for
processing as directed by NCTE HQ vide their letter dated 23.12.2010.
The SRC in its 217th Meeting held on 8th – 9th February, 2012 considered the
request of the new applicant institution for change of course from the one
mentioned in on-line application and decided to refuse/reject the institution
application on the ground that “it is mandatory for the teacher educational
institution to apply online for recognition of a teacher education course.
Therefore if the institution has mentioned a particular course in on-line
application the same course should be considered for processing and not to
consider offline application for change of the course”. The institutions may apply
afresh for the next session.
Accordingly, the application of Vagdevi College of Education, Khasra No. 25/7,
Plot No. 8-41/1A, Thumukapalli Gate Post, Kothavalasa Taluk, and Town,
Vizianagaram District-535183, Andhra Pradesh request to change course from
D.E.C.Ed to D.El.Ed course is hereby rejected/refused.
Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution on 27/03/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-156/2012
Appeal/4th Meeting-2012 dated 11/05/2012 stating that
“…the Council noted the nomenclature of the course applied for took place due
to lack of awareness about the technique involved in on-line submission and the
59
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
appellant institution admitted the same in their letter dated 02.12.2011
addressed to SRC.Since all the documents submitted by the institution indicate
that the course intended is D.EI.Ed and not D.E.C.Ed the Council came to the
conclusion that the appeal deserved to be accepted and the matter remanded to
SRC for taking further action.
After perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal ,affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council concluded
that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand case to the
SRC for taking further action”.
In pursuance to the appellate authority order, the application was processed and
placed before SRC .The SRC in its 226th meeting held on 9th-10th July 2012,
considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 28.06.2012 & 04/07/2012 and
all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause
Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 27.07.2012.
The institution
submitted its written representation on 30.07.2012.(with
reference to online minutes).
The SRC in its 230th meeting held on 16th - 17th August 2012 considered the
reply of the institution dated 30-07-2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was fixed between 03rd-06th
September, 2012, and the same was intimated to the institution on 31/08/2012.
Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 06/09/2012.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012 considered
the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for
the following:

Land documents for all the survey numbers is to be submitted.

Fresh VCD covering front view of the building and other infrastructural
and instructional facilities to be provided.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 02.11.2012.
The institution has submitted the reply on 07.11.2012.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 decided to issue Letter
of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual
intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2013-14 subject to the
appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the
Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the
commencement of the academic session.
Accordingly, letter of intent was issued to the institution on.29/11/2012. The institution
60
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
has submitted written representation on 26/12/2012.
The SRC in its 237th Meeting held on 05th-06th January, 2013, considered the reply dated
26/12/2012 and decided to grant “Formal Recognition for 2013-14 subject to
production of service certificate for Lecture (Telugu)”, within 60 days.
Accordingly, a letter was sent to the institution on 22/01/2013.
The institution has submitted its reply on 29/1/2013, enclosing Affidavit & Service
certificate of Shri M.V. Krishna Murthy worked as Telugu Teacher from 12/06/2001 to
16/04/2012. (copy enclosed)
The matter was placed before SRC in its 238th Meeting held on 5th and 6th February
, 2013 and the matter was deferred to 239th Meeting of SRC, again it was deferred
to 240th Meeting of SRC .
The SRC, in its 241st meeting held on 29th,30th March and 1st April 2013, considered
the matter and noted the matter.
As per the decision of 237th Meeting of SRC held on 5th – 6th January 2013,wherein it
was decided to grant “Formal Recognition for 2013-14 subject to production of
service certificate for Lecture (Telugu)”, within 60 days ,the institution has submitted
the Service Certificate of the lecturer.
The Committee considered the matter and decided that, the decision to
accord formal recognition for 2013-14, taken in its 237th meeting on 5th – 6th
Jan, 2013, and communicated vide out letter No. 48269 dt, 22-01-2013 is
confirmed.
21
SRCAPP772
D.El.Ed
Seicom D.El.Ed
College,
Chittoor District
AP
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles
submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional
Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to
D.El.Ed.,
course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from the session 2013-14.
Seicom D.EL.Ed College, Plot/Khasara No. 840/1 & 840/2, R.V.Palli Street
and Village, Kalikiri Post, City and Taluk, Chittoor District - 517234, Andhra
Pradesh.
Sri Seicom Society, Plot No. 840/1, 840/2, Rajuvari Palli Road, Kalikiri Village
and Post, Kalikiri City and Taluk, Chottoor District – 517234, Andhra Pradesh
had applied for grant of recognition to Seicom D.EL.Ed College, Plot/Khasara
No. 840/1 & 840/2, R.V.Palli Street and Village, Kalikiri Post, City and Taluk,
Chittoor District - 517234, Andhra Pradesh for D.E.C.Ed Course of Two years
duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 27.09.2011 and physical copy received on
03.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 03.11.2011/ 14.12.2011. A deficiency letter
was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011. The institution replied to the
deficiency letter on 24.02.12.
The SRC in its 219th Meeting held on 15th-16th March, 2012 considered the reply
of the institution vide letter dated 24.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1)
61
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 04/04/2012.
The institution submitted a written representation on 16/04/2012.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09th –10th May 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 16-04-2012 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause
Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:



In the building completion certificate submitted, seal & signature of the
approving authority is not affixed.
As per on-line application, the Society’s name is “SRI SEICOM
SOCIETY’, whereas, as per affidavit it reflects Society’s Name as “SRI
SRINIVASA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMERCE SOCIETY’. This
difference of Society’s name may be explained by the management.
The institution has submitted all the documents for D.El.Ed course, but
on-line application is for D.E.C.Ed course. Change of course is not
permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009.
Accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
25.06.2012. The institution has submitted its written representation on
13/07/2012.
The reply of the institution vide letter dated 13.07.2012 to the show cause notice
was duly considered by SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th – 25th July,2012
and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as
under:

The institution has submitted all the documents related for D.El.Ed
course, but on-line application is for D.E.C.Ed course, change of course
is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009.
As per Regulations/NCTE guidelines, on-line application submitted is for
D.E.C.Ed is only to be considered for grant of Recognition. Change course to
another course, other than the online is not permissible as per NCTE
Regulations 2009.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the
institution for recognition of D.E.C.Ed course.
Accordingly a rejection order was issued to the institution on 13/08/2012.
Against SRC’s rejection order, the institution filed a Writ Petition in the Hon’ble
High Court of Andhra Pradesh in W. P. No. 24085 of 2012 and the Hon’ble High
Court of Andhra Pradesh in its order dated 06/08/2012 has stated that ‘the
respondent 1 is directed to reconsider the petitioner’s application by
treating the same as having been made for permission to start D.EI.Ed
course and pass a fresh order in accordance with law within a period of
62
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.’
The SRC in its 231st Meeting held on 22nd – 23rd August, 2012, considered the
Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh order dated. 06/08/2012 and all other
relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of
NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per
the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the
deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
As per the direction of SRC, the inspection of the institution was conducted on
06.09.2012 and the VT Report received in the office of SRC on 17.09.02012.
The SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012 considered
the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on.,30/10/2012.
The institution submitted written representation on 29/10/2012.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 decided to issue
Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year
duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year
2013-14 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted
selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating
University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic
session.
Accordingly, letter of intent was issued to the institution on.29/11/2012. The
institution has submitted written representation on 14/12/2012.
The SRC in its 237th Meeting held on 05th-06th January, 2013, considered the
reply dated 14/12/2012 and decided to grant “Formal Recognition for 2013-14
subject to production of service certificate for Lecturer (Maths)”, within 60
days
As per the information of the website the institution has submitted reply on
10/01/2013.enclosing service certificate of Shri B. Ravi, worked as School
Assistant Maths in ZP G High School Kuppam from 08/11/1976 to
15/07/1977 & as school assistant ,Mathematics in Z.P.Girls High
School,Piler from 16/07/1977 to 15/01/1982 as per the school records.
The matter was placed before SRC in its 238th Meeting held on 5th and 6th
February , 2013 and the matter was deferred to 239th Meeting of SRC, again
it was deferred to 240th Meeting of SRC .
Again, the SRC, in its 241st meeting held on 29th,30th March and 1st April
2013, considered the matter and noted the matter.
Note : As per the decision of 237th Meeting of SRC held on 5th – 6th January
2013,wherein it was decided to grant “Formal Recognition for 2013-14 subject to
production of service certificate for Lecture (Maths)”, within 60 days ,the institution
has submitted the Service Certificate of the lecturer.
The Committee considered the matter and decided that, the decision to
accord formal recognition for 2013-14, taken in its 237th meeting on 5th – 6th
63
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Jan, 2013, is confirmed and as per institution’s response through website
uploads information.
22
SRCAPP1745
D.El.Ed
Sri Harsha
D.Ed College,
Nellore District
AP
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles
submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional
Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to
D.El.Ed.,
course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from the session 2013-14.
Sri Harsha D.Ed Collage, Plot No 11/11, 15/18, 15/1, 16/2, NH-17 Street,
Pothireddipalem Village & Post Office, Kovur Mandal, Nellore District – 524
137, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Harsha Educational Society, Plot No. 17/47A, Dronamrajuvari Street, Backside
Shivapriya Lodge Village, Nellore Post & Taluk, Nellore District- 524001, Andhra
Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri Harsha D.Ed Collage, Plot No 11/11,
15/18, 15/1, 16/2, NH-17 Street, Pothireddipalem Village & Post Office, Kovur Mandal,
Nellore District – 524 137, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of Two years duration
under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE
online on 01.10.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on
05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government
for recommendation on 31.10.2011/21.12.2011 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was
issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter
on 24.02.2012.
The SRC in its 219th meeting held on 15th-16th March, 2012 considered the written reply
of the institution and other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection to
examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly
rectified by the institution, under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was fixed between 09 th-13th April, 2012 the
same was intimated to the institution on 30/03/2012 the Inspection of the institution was
conducted on 11/04/2012.
The Southern Regional Committee in its 222 nd Meeting held on 9th – 10th May 2012
considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 09/06/2012. The
institution submitted its written representation on 25/06/2012.
The reply of the institution vide letter dated 25.06.2012 to the show cause notice
was duly considered by the SRC in its 226th meeting held on 09th-10th July, 2012
and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as
under:

The institution has submitted one building completion certificate
dt.22.06.2012 from Executive engineer, I & CAD Irrigation Division, Tirupati.
The institution has submitted and second building completion certificate
dt.15.02.2012 from Assistant Executive engineer, P.R. Projects, Atmakur,
AP, The institution has submitted two different building completion
certificates from two different engineers of two different locations, whereas
the institution is located at Kovur Mandal, Nellure District AP as per Building
plan, which is not acceptable.
64
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

The certificate issued by two different officials other than the certificate from
the engineer of the area or location is not as per norms.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the
institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 21/08/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution approached the Hon’ble
High Court in W.P.No. 23586/2012 dated 21/08/2012. The Hon’ble High Court
has passed an order which is as under:
“ By order of High Court dated 21/08/2012 in WP.No 23586 of 2012
filed by the Petitioner Vizianagaram, 1. Sri Harsha Educational
Society (Regn. No. 516/06) 17/47A, Dronam Raju Street, Nellore524001, Rep. By its President M. Haribabu, 2. Sri Harsh D.Ed
College, Pothireddipalem, Kovvur (M) Nellore-524137, Rep., by its
Correspondent M. Hari Babu, The Writ Petition is allowed and order
dated 9th – 10th – 07- 2012 of Respondent No. 2 is set aside
respondent no. 2 is directed to re-consider the petitioners
application in the light of the building completion certificate dated
22/06/2012 and take a fresh decision within a period of two weeks
from the date of receipt of this order-order follows.”
The matter was placed before the committee and SRC in its 231st meeting held
on 22nd – 23rd August, 2012 decided to process the application.
Accordingly, the application was processed and placed before SRC for decision
and direction.
The SRC in its 232nd meeting held on 29th to 31st August 2012 has
considered the Hon’ble High court order dated 21/08/2012 and all the
relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show
cause Notice under section 14 (1) NCTE Act for the following.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. Engineer
is to be submitted.
In the meantime, the institution submitted its reply on 25.09.2012 with reference
of 232nd meeting minutes available on NCTE website.
The same was placed before SRC in its 234th Meeting held on 17th-18th October, 2012
and the committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed
course for two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) (one uint) for the
academic year 2013-14.
Accordingly, as per direction of SRC,a letter of intent prior to recognition was issued to
applicant institution on 25/10/2012. In response to Letter of Intent , the institution has
65
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
submitted reply vide letter dated 19/11/2012.
The matter was placed before SRC in its 236th Meeting held on 16th-18th December,
2012 the Committee decided to grant “Formal Recognition for 2013-14 subject to
creating the website”.
Accordingly, a letter was sent to the institution on 27/12/2012. The institution has
submitted its reply on 09/1/2013. The institution has created website i.e.
www.sriharshacollege.com it is checked and it is functioning.
The matter was placed before SRC in its 238th Meeting held on 5th and 6th February ,
2013 and the matter was deferred to 239th Meeting of SRC, again it was deferred to 240th
Meeting of SRC .
Again, the SRC, in its 241st meeting held on 29th,30th March and 1st April 2013,
considered the matter and noted the matter.
As per the decision of 236th Meeting of SRC held on 16th – 17th December 2012.
,wherein it was decided to grant “Formal Recognition for 2013-14 subject to creating
the website”. “,the institution has created the website and it is functioning..
The Committee considered the matter and decided that, the decision to
accord formal recognition for 2013-14, taken in its 237th meeting on 5th – 6th
Jan, 2013, and communicated vide out letter No. 47895 dt, 27-12-2012 is
confirmed.
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles
submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional
Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to
D.El.Ed.,
course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from the session 2013-14.
23
SRCAPP1346
D.El.Ed
Suprabhath
College of
Diploma in
Education,
Rangareddy
District
AP
Suprabhath College of Diploma in Education, No.147/A, Cheeryal Village,
Keesara Post & Taluk, Rangareddy District - 501 101, Andhra Pradesh
KTTC Kaushik Educational Society, No.147/A, Cheeryal Village, Keesara Post &
Taluka, Rangareddi District - 501301, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of
recognition to Suprabhath College of Diploma in Education, No.147/A, Cheeryal
Village, Keesara Post & Taluk, Rangareddy District - 501 101, Andhra Pradesh for
D.Ed Course of Two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical application has
been received in the office of SRC on 17.10.2011.
NCTE-Hqrs , had directed to process the application in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009 and amendment notified on 26th November , 2010 which read
as follows : 2 (b) for Sub-Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted
namely 1(1-A) (1) the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more
of the following circumstances :
 The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National
Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or
before the date of submission of online application.
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
66
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
authority indicating that the society/ Institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 6th – 7th November,
2012 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
documents NCTE Act 1993 Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on
the table, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the
following grounds :
 Not submitted within time frame as per Regulation 2009..
Accordingly,
a
rejection
letter
to
the
institution
F.No.SRCAPP1346/D.Ed/AP/2012-13/36243 dated 24.01.2012.
vide
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-83/2012
Appeal/3rd Meeting-2012 dated 18.04.2012 states that “ the council reached
the conclusion that there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and
remand the matter to the SRC for further processing of application on
merit as per regulations.”
The institution has submitted its written representation on 10.05.2012.
The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th –25th July 2012 considered the
Appellate authority order, reply of the institution vide letter dt. 10.05.2012 and all
the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause
Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil
authority is not submitted.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt.
authorized engineer is not submitted. In the BCC submitted.

Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted.

Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office
stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the
educational purpose is not submitted.

In the affidavit submitted, column No. 5 is not duly filled up.

Details of running other teacher education/technical course in the
same building/premises is not given.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 13.08.2012.
The institution has submitted the written representation on 14/08/2012.
The SRC in its 231st Meeting held on 22rd – 23rd August 2012 considered the
reply of the institution dt.14-08-2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
67
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
As per the direction of SRC, the inspection of the institution was conducted on
07.09.2011.
The SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012, considered
the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the
following:

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil
authority is not submitted.
Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 30.10.2012. The
institution has submitted its written representation dt. 14.11.2012 received in the
office of SRC on 16.11.2012.
The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th-17th December 2012, decided to issue
Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration
with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2013-14.
Accordingly, LETTER OF INTENT was issued to the institution on 27.12.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 25.02.2012.
The matter was placed before SRC in its 241st meeting held on 29th-31st
March 2013, decided to “ask the institution to get the website activated”.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 03.04.2013 (with
reference to online decision of 241st meeting) stating as follows:“….we have already submitted our college website details which is already in
activation to your office on 28.03.2013 mentioning the details of website along
with downloaded copies of relevant information from our college website. Our
college website is www.suprabhathedn.com.”
The institution has submitted 241st meeting decision copy, photocopy of
institution letter dt. 28.03.2013(not found in the file) along with photocopies of
website details. The website address is functioning.
24
SRCAPP1666
D.El.Ed
Srinivasa
College of
Elementary
Education,
Mahabubnagar
District
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles
submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional
Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to
D.El.Ed.,
course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from the session 2014-15.
Srinivasa College of Elementary Education Plot/Khasara No.180, Koildinne
Street, Shanti Nagar Village and Post, Shanti Nagar Taluk and City,
Mahbubnagar District-509144,Andhra Pradesh.
Koildinne Bucchanna Educational SocietyPlot No.2-33, Main Road, Koildinne
Village and Post, Alampur Taluk, Koildinne City, Mahbubnagar District-509126,
Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Srinivasa College of
Elementary Education Plot/Khasara No.180, Koildinne Street, Shanti Nagar
68
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
AP
Village and Post, Shanti Nagar Taluk and City, Mahbubnagar District-509144,
Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of
the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on
01.10.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on
05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08.11.2011 followed by reminder on
22.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The
institution has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on
05.03.2012.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April 2012, considered the
reply of the institution dt. 05.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section
14(1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 15.05.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 04.06.2012.
The SRC in its 224th meeting held on 14th-16th June 2012,considered the reply of
the institution to the show cause notice and the reply is unconvincing and not
satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:
1. Land document registered dt. 28.02.2012 which is after the date of online submission of application, which is not permissible as per NCTE
regulations 2009.
2. Land Use Certificate for educational purpose is not submitted.
3. Building Plan is not approved by the competent authority.
4. Proceedings of Land Use Certificate is for the purpose of non-agriculture
i.e. for commercial purpose and not for educational purpose.
5. In Encumbrance Certificate nature of land document mentioned as
Rectification deed. Rectification deed dt. 28.02.2012 is after submission
of online application.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, , the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution
for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution vide
No.F.No.SRCAPP1666 /D.El.Ed /2012-13/43612 dated 09.07.2012.
The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority
vide order no. F.No. 89-405/2012 Appeal/8 th Meeting- 2012 dated 18.09.2012
has stated as follows:
“ the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to
remand the case to the SRC with a direction to process the applications
and to take the further decision thereafter.
69
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The council hereby remands back the case of Srinivasa College of
Elementary Education, Plot/Khasara No.180, Koildinne Street, Shanti
Nagar Village and Post, Shanti Nagar Taluk and City, Mahabubnagar509144, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as
indicated above.”
The matter is placed before SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th
September 2012, considered the matter decided to process.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st - 22nd November, 2012 considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 18/09/2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
The inspection intimation letter was issued to the institution on 30.11.2012.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 10th -13h December 2012.
The same was intimated to institution on 30.11.2012. The inspection was
conducted on 10.12.2012. The VT report was received by SRC on 13.12.2012.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the
institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of
NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to
time laid on the table, the Southern Regional Committee in its 237th
meeting held on 5th – 6th January 2013,decided to issue Letter of Intent for
grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual
intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2013-14 subject to
the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection
committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating
University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic
session.
Accordingly, a letter of Intent was issued to the institution 16/01/2013.The
institution has submitted a written representation on 287/01/2013.
Reply of the Institution to the Letter of Intent was placed before SRC in its 238th
meeting held on 5th – 6th February 2013.Ther matter was deferred to 239th
meeting and then to 240th meeting.
The reply of the institution was considered in 241st meeting of SRC , where in the
committee decided to call for original FDRs.
The institution has submitted written representation along with original FDRs. of
Rs. 5 lakhs and 3 lakhs on 08/04/2013.
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles
submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional
Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to
D.El.Ed.,
course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from the session 2014-15.
70
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Volume-01
Consideration of New Application (2013-2014)
25
SRCAPP1875
B.Ed
ERK College of
Education,
Dharmapuri
District
TN
ERK College of Educatin for Women, Khasara no. 37/5D3, 37/6A, 78/4,
Erumyampatti Village, Kokkarapatti Post, Pappireddipatti Taluka,
Dharmapuri District, Pin-636905, Tamilnadu
ERK Educational Trust, Erumiyampatti Village, Kakkarapatti Post,
Pappireddipatti Taluka, Dharmapuri District, Pin-636905, Tamilandu had
applied for grant of recognition to ERK College of Educatin for Women,
Khasara no. 37/5D3, 37/6A, 78/4, Erumyampatti Village, Kokkarapatti Post,
Pappireddipatti Taluka, Dharmapuri District, Pin-636905, Tamilnadu for B.Ed
Course for one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 25.12.2012. The institution has
submitted hard copy of the application on 31.12.2012 along with processing along
with processing fees vide Demand Draft bearing no. 789399 dated 15.12.2012 for
Rs.50050/- drawn on Indian Bank.
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A(i)]
 The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application;
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application;
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not
dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online
application.
Para 7[1-A(ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under the
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the
applicant and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online
submission of the application.
In this application the following has been observed:

As per the land documents land is sold to individual, Shri.E.R.Selvaraj who
is the president of ERK Educational Society. Since the land is in the name
of individual.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
71
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application is admitted for processing.
26
SRCAPP2062
B.Ed
Sri Thiyagaraja
Institute of
Teacher
Education,
Thiruvarur
District
TN
Sri Thiyagaraja Institute of Teacher Education, Plot/Khasara No. 1.77, Plot
No. 1.77, Street No. Naveli, Agarathirunallur Village, Kattur Post Office,
Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur District, Pin-610104, Tamilnadu
Sri Ramakrishna Educational & Charitable Trust, Plot No. 1.77, Street/Road.
Naveli Salai, Kattur Village & Post Office, KudavaSAL Taluk, Thiruvarur
District, Pin-610104, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Sri
Thiyagaraja Institute of Teacher Education, Plot/Khasara No. 1.77, Plot No.
1.77, Street No. Naveli, Agarathirunallur Village, Kattur Post Office,
Kudavasal Taluk, Thiruvarur District, Pin-610104, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course
for one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern
Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.12.2012. The institution has submitted
hard copy of the application on 31.12.2012 along with processing along with
processing fees vide Demand Draft bearing no. 397159 dated 29.12.2012 for
Rs.50100/- drawn on Union Bank.
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A(i)]
 The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application;
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application;
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not
dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online
application.
Para 7[1-A(ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under the
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the
applicant and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online
submission of the application.
In this application the following has been observed:

As per the land documents the land is in favour of individual ie Shri K.R.
Natarajan Sastry who is the Founder and Chairman of Sri Ramakrishna
Educational & Charitable Trust. In Tamil version also it is clearly
mentioned about the ownership (as individual). As per regulations, land
should be in favour of Society/Institution.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
72
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
27
SRCAPP1914
B.Ed-AI
Raja Desingh
College of
Education,
Villupuram
District
TN
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application is admitted for processing.
Raja Desingh College of Education, Khasara no. 86/3, 4A, 4B, 2A & 88/2,
Kalaiyur Village and Post, Gingee Taluka, Villupuram District, Pin-604206,
Tamilnadu
St.John Sangam Trust, THRC Campus, Chennai High Way Road, Elambalur
Village and Post, Perambalur Taluka, Perambalur District, Pin-621212,
Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Raja Desingh College of
Education, Khasara no. 86/3, 4A, 4B, 2A & 88/2, Kalaiyur Village and Post,
Gingee Taluka, Villupuram District, Pin-604206, Tamilnadu for B.Ed-AI Course
for one year duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern
Regional Committee, NCTE online on 27.12.2012. The institution has submitted
hard copy of the application on 03.01.2013 along with processing along with
processing fees vide DD baring no. 329612 dtd. 27.12.2012 for Rs. 50,050/drawn on Indian Bank.
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A(i)]
 The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application;
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application;
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not
dispatched w ithin 7 days of the submission of the online
application.
Para 7[1-A(ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under the
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the
applicant and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online
submission of the application.
this application the following has been observed:

As per both version the land is in favour of individual who is the Managing
Direction of the Trust.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application, which suffer from basic
infirmities, is summarily rejected as per Regulation 7 {1-A(i)}.

The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of
73
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
submission of online application.

28
SRCAPP1915
M.Ed
Thanthai Hans
Roever College
of Education,
Perambalur
District
TN
As per both version the land is in favour of individual, who is the
Managing Director of the Trust, which is not permissible as per NCTE
Regulations 2009, which states as under:
As per 8, (7) (i) of regulations 2009: No institution shall be granted
recognition under these Regulations unless the institution or society
sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on the date of
application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either on
ownership basis or on lease from Government or Government institutions
for a period of not less than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or
Union Territory laws the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30
years, the State Government or Union Territory Administration law shall
prevail. However, no building shall be taken on lease for running any
teacher training course.
Thanthai Hans Roever College of Education, Plot/Khasara no. 75/1B, Street
no. 2/1166, Elambalur Village and Post, Perambalur Taluka, Perambalur
District, Pin-621212, Tamilnadu
St.John Sangam Trust, THRC Campus, Chennai High Way Road, Elambalur
Village and Post, Perambalur Taluka, Perambalur District, Pin-621212,
Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to Thanthai Hans Roever
College of Education, Plot/Khasara no. 75/1B, Street no. 2/1166, Elambalur
Village and Post, Perambalur Taluka, Perambalur District, Pin-621212,
Tamilnadu for M.Ed Course for one year duration under Section 15(1) of the
NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on
27.12.2012. The institution has submitted hard copy of the application on
03.01.2013 along with processing along with processing fees vide challan no.
m376436 dtd. 28.12.2012 for Rs. 50,100/-.
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A(i)]
 The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application;
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application;
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not
dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online
application.
Para 7[1-A(ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under the
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the
applicant and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online
74
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
submission of the application.
In this application the following has been observed:

On-line application was submitted on 27.12.2012 and challan was remitted
on 28.12.2012. Hence, the society has not remitted the processing fee as
provided under rule 9 of the National Council for Teacher Education Rules,
1997 is not furnished on or before the date of submission of online
application,
as required under sub-regulation 7(1-A)(i)(a) of NCTE
Regulations 2009.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application, which suffer from basic
infirmities, is summarily rejected as per Regulation 7 {1-A(i)}.

29
SRCAPP2034
B.Ed
Sri Vijay
Vidyalaya
College of
Education,
Dharmapuri
District
TN
On-line application was submitted on 27.12.2012 and Challan was
remitted on 28.12.2012. Hence, the society has not remitted the
processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of
submission of online application, as required under sub-regulation 7 {1A)(i) (a)} of NCTE Regulations 2009.
Sri Vijay Vidyalaya College of Education, Khasara no. 41, Vijaya Nagar,
Virupatchipuram Village, Dharmapuri Post and Taluk, Dharmapur District,
Pin-636701, Tamilnadu
Attur Educational and Charitable Trust, Plot no. 313/7, Salem-Chennai
Street, Appamasamuthram Village, Narasingapuram Post, Attur Taluka,
Salem District, Pin-6361008, Tamilnadu had applied for grant of recognition to
Sri Vijay Vidyalaya College of Education, Khasara no. 41, Vijaya Nagar,
Virupatchipuram Village, Dharmapuri Post and Taluk, Dharmapur District,
Pin-636701, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course for one year duration under Section
14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online
on 29.12.2012. The institution has submitted hard copy of the application on
31.12.2012 along with processing along with processing fees vide Demand Draft
bearing no. 193579 & 29304 dated 29.12.2012 & 28.12.2012 for Rs.50050/drawn on Indian Bank.
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A(i)]
 The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application;
 Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application;
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the
75
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
course possessed land on the date of application is not
dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the online
application.
Para 7[1-A(ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under the
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the
applicant and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online
submission of the application.
In this application the following has been observed:

Land is in the name of individual and land document submitted by the
institution is in Regional Language.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application, which suffer from basic
infirmities, is summarily rejected as per Regulation.

Land is in the name of individual and land document submitted by the
institution is in Regional Language. which is not permissible as per
NCTE Regulations 2009, which states as under:
As per 8, (7) (i) of regulations 2009: No institution shall be granted
recognition under these Regulations unless the institution or society
sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on the date of
application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either on
ownership basis or on lease from Government or Government institutions
for a period of not less than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or
Union Territory laws the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30
years, the State Government or Union Territory Administration law shall
prevail. However, no building shall be taken on lease for running any
teacher training course.
30
SRCAPP2059
B.Ed
Adarsha
Education
Society,
Haveri District
KA
Adarsha Education Society,Plot No. 172/1, 174/2, Vidyanagar,Rattihalli
Road,Byadagai
Post
and
Taluk,Byadagi
City,Haveri
District
–
5811006,Karnataka
Adarsha Education society,No.6472/765 & 6742/766,Plot No. 172/1,
174/2,Vidyanagar Byadagi Village and Post, Byadagi City,Haveri District – 581106
Karnataka had applied for grant of recognition to Adarsha Education Society,Plot
No. 172/1, 174/2, Vidyanagar,Rattihalli Road,Byadagai Post and Taluk,Byadagi
City,Haveri District – 5811006,Karnataka,for B.Ed Course for one year duration
under Section 14 of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee,
NCTE online on 29.12.2012. The institution has submitted hard copy of the
application on 03/01/2013 along with processing fees of Rs. 50,050/- vide D.D.No.
684968 dated 27/12/2012 of Syndicate Bank, Byadagi.
A letter to the State Government was sent vide this office letter no.
F.No.SRCAPP2059/B.Ed/KA/2013-14/48511 dated 04/02/2013.
76
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A (i)]
A. The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for Teac
Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of submission of on
application;
B. Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within 7 days
the submission of the online application;
C. Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority indicating
the society/institution applying for the course possessed land on the date
application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of the on
application.
Para 7[1-A (ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection under
circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the application to the applic
and refund the processing fees within 30 days of the online submission of
application.
Further, 8(7) (i) of NCTE Regulations reads as under:
No institution shall be granted recognition under these Regulations unless
institution or society sponsoring the institution is in possession of required land on
date of application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either on owners
basis or on lease from Government or Government institutions for a period of not l
than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws
maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State Governmen
Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However, no building shall be tak
on lease for running any teacher training course.
In this application the following has been observed:
As per the land document, the land is registered in favour of an individual and not
in Society’s favour. The individual is a designated President.
Sl.No
1
2
3
Items
Details
Name and address of the Adarsha Education Society,
Society/ Trust.
Plot No. 172/1, 174/2, Vidyanagar,
Rattihalli Road,Byadagai Post and
Taluk,
Byadagi City
Haveri District – 5811006
Karnataka
Name and address of the Adarsha Education society
Institution
No.6472/765 & 6742/766
Plot No. 172/1, 174/2,Vidyanagar
Byadagi Village and Post,
Byadagi City,
Haveri District – 581106
Karnataka
Application code
SRCAPP2059
77
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
State
Whether it is Minority
Institution (Yes/No)
a) Course applied for
b) Is it banned (Yes/No)
a)
Date
of
online
submission
b) Is it on or before 31-122012
Date of dispatch of Hard
copy(in triplicate)
Was land owned by the
Society/ Trust on the date
of on-line application
Whether the following have
been submitted along with
hard copy
a)DD for Rs. 50,000
towards
processing fee.
Karnataka
No
a)
b)
a)
b)
B.Ed
No
29.12.2012
yes, before 31.12.2012
03/01/2013
As per the land document, the land
is registered in favour of individual
and in Society’s favour.
Paid. D.D of Rs. 50,050/- vide D.D.No.
684968 dated 27/12/2012 of Syndicate
Bank, Byadagi
Photocopy
submitted.
of
the
sale
deed
is
b)Certified copy of the Title
deed
Prepared by
Verified by
A letter to the State Government is sent vide this office letter no.
F.No.SRCAPP2059/B.Ed/KA/2013-14/48511 dated 04/02/2013
In this application the following has been observed:
As per the land document, the land is registered in favour of an individual and not
in Society’s favour. The individual is a designated President.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application is admitted for processing.
31
SRCAPP198
B.Ed
Bhanu Prakash
P.V,
Nee Vee
Education
Trust,
Davanagere
District
KA
Bhanu Prakash.P.V,Plot No. 465/ALM57,SH Road,Honnali Village,Post and
Taluk,Davangere District – 577217,Karnataka
Nee Vee Education Trust,Plot No. 465/ALM57,Shimoga Road,Honnali
Village,Post and Taluk,
Davangere District – 577217, Karnataka had applied for grant of recognition to
Bhanu Prakash.P.V,Plot No. 465/ALM57,SH Road,Honnali Village,Post and
Taluk,Davangere District – 577217,Karnataka,for B.Ed Course for one year
duration under Section 14 of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 31.12.2012. The institution has submitted hard copy
of the application on 07/01/2013 along with processing fees of Rs. 50,200/- vide
No. 625785 dated 31/12/2012 of State Bank of Mysore,Malebennur
78
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
A letter to the State Government is sent vide this office letter no.
F.No.SRCAPP198/B.Ed/KA/2013-14/48554 dated 04/02/2013.
Para 7[1-A(i)] and 7[1-A(ii)] of extant NCTE Regulations published in the
Gazettee of India on 31st August 2009, as amended from time to time, the
application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
Para 7[1-A (i)]
D. The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council for
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date
of submission of online application;
E. Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application;
F. Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society/institution applying for the course
possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.
Para 7[1-A (ii)]
The Regional Committee shall, after recording reasons for rejection
under the circumstances referred to in clause (i) above, return the
application to the applicant and refund the processing fees within 30
days of the online submission of the application.
Further, 8(7) (i) of NCTE Regulations reads as under:
No institution shall be granted recognition under these Regulations unless
the institution or society sponsoring the institution is in possession of
required land on the date of application. The land free from all
encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on lease from
Government or Government institutions for a period of not less than 30
years. In cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws the
maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State
Government or Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However,
no building shall be taken on lease for running any teacher training
course.
In this application the following has been observed:
As per the land document, the land is registered in favour of an individual
and not in Society’s favour. The individual is a designated President.
Sl.No
1
Items
Details
Name and address of the Society/ Nee Vee Education Trust,
Trust.
Plot No. 465/ALM57,Shimoga Road,
Honnali Village,Post and Taluk,
Davangere District – 577217
Karnataka
79
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
2
Name and address of the Institution
3
4
5
Application code
State
Whether it is Minority Institution
(Yes/No)
a) Course applied for
b) Is it banned (Yes/No)
a) Date of online submission
b) Is it on or before 31-12-2012
Date of dispatch of Hard copy(in
triplicate)
Was land owned by the Society/
Trust on the date of on-line
application
Whether the following have been
submitted along with hard copy
6
7
8
9
10
Bhanu Prakash.P.V
Plot No. 465/ALM57,
SH Road,Honnali Village,Post and Tal
Davangere District – 577217,
Karnataka
SRCAPP198
Karnataka
No
a) B.Ed
b) No
a) 31/12/2012
b) on 31/12/2012
07/01/2013
Land is favour of an individual as pe
land document submitted.
a)DD for Rs. 50,000 towards
processing fee.
Paid. D.D. of Rs. 50,200/- vide No. 62
dated 31/12/2012 of State Ban
Mysore,Malebennur
b)Certified copy of the Title deed
Photocopy of the sale deed is submitte
A letter to the State Government is sent vide this office letter no.
F.No.SRCAPP198/B.Ed/KA/2013-14/48554 dated 04/02/2013
Land document is in favour of an individual and not in favour of society. The
individual is Managing Trustee.
The Southern Regional Committee reviewed the duly scrutinized above new
application received by Southern Regional Office, NCTE for the Session
2013-14. Accordingly, the above application is admitted for processing.
32
------Instructions in
respect of
consideration /
processing of
applications for
recognition of
Teacher
Education
Programmes for
academic
session 201314.
Instructions in respect of consideration / processing of applications for
recognition of Teacher Education Programmes for academic session 201314.
SRC, NCTE is in receipt of letter dt.20.03.2013 from NCTE, Hqrs pertaining to
Instructions in respect of consideration / processing of applications for recognition
of Teacher Education Programmes for academic session 2013-14.
In this regard, Para 7 of the letter reads as under:
The letters of State Governments of Puducherry and Haryana could not be consi
NCTE Committee since they reached NCTE after taking decision in respect of impos
the Courses in these states for inviting applications for the academic session 2013-1
it was communicated to them that their letters as ‘objection’ to the grant of recog
80
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
PU
Teacher Education Institutions or for additional intake to existing courses, and to
action along those lines (Copies enclosed).
Further, the SRC in its 241st meeting noted that the letter of the Government of
Puducherry has not been enclosed with the NCTE, Hqrs letter.
Now, SRC, NCTE has received the letter dt.14.11.2012 (copy enclosed) written to
NCTE, Hqrs by the Government of Puducherry, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry
para 2 reads as under:
At present, 48 Nos. of Teacher Training Institutions and 26 Nos of B.Ed colleges are
the Union Territory of Puducherry including two Govt./Quasi Govt. Institutions. In orde
quality of education, this Administration is of the view that no further such Institut
recommended for starting any new Teacher Training Institutes offering D.T.Ed / B.
the Union Territory of Puducherry.
Sl.
N
o.
1
2
Ap
On-line
plic submis
atio
sion
n
cod
e
SR 29.12.20
CA 12
PP
201
2
SR
CA
PP
214
0
31.12.20
12
Date of
receipt
08.01.2013
(Date of
dispatch
04.01.2013
)
Name and
address of the
institution
Senthil College of
Education,
Plot/Khasara No.
R.S. No. 158/8,
Plot No. 42, Mettu
ST, Valarpirai
Nagar Village,
Sulthanpet Post
Office, Puducherry
Taluk, Puducherry
District, Pin605110,
Pondicherry.
04.01.2013 Vasavi College of
Education,
Plot/Khasara No.
118/7-A, 293/4,5,6,
Street no. NH 45A, Madagadipet
Village and Post,
Mannadipet
Commune Taluka,
Pondicherry City,
Puducherry
District, Pin605107.
Cou
rse
Min
orit
y
stat
us
Statu
s
B.E
d-AI
Non
min
ority
Under
proces
s for
issuan
ce of
Defici
ency
letter
M.E
d
Non
min
ority
Reject
ed
81
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
3
SR
CA
PP
11
31.12.20
12
4
SR
CA
PP
43
31.12.20
12
5
SR
CA
PP
77
31.12.20
12
08.01.2013
(Date of
dispatch
04.01.2013
)
Senthil College of
Education,
Plot/Khasara No.
R.S. No. 158/8,
Plot No. 42, Mettu
ST, Valarpirai
Nagar Village,
Sulthanpet Post
Office, Puducherry
Taluk, Puducherry
District, Pin605110,
Pondicherry.
07.01.2013 Department of
Physical Education
& Sports, Khasra
No/Plot No. 206,
ECR Road,
Kalapet Revenue
Village & P.O,
Kalapet Taluka,
Puducherry
District, Pin –
605014,
03.01.2013 Regency Institute
of Teacher
Training,
Plot/Khasara No.
Mettakur, Plot No.
37/1,39/3…….etc,
Street No. 1-8-237,
Mettakur Village,
Yanam Post
Office, Yanam
Taluk, Yanam
District, Pin533464,
Pondicherry.
M.E
d
Non
min
ority
Reject
ed
M.P
.Ed
Non
min
ority
Under
proces
s for
issuan
ce of
Defici
ency
letter
D.El
.Ed
Non
min
ority
To
proces
s and
Defici
ency
letter
was
issued
on
21.03.
2013
The Committee considered the matter and decided as under:
1) SRCAPP2012-B.Ed-Al course is rejected due to ban as per the
recommendation of the Union Territory Govt. of Pondicherry vide
letter dt. 14.11.2012.
2) SRCAPP2140-M.Ed course already rejected in 238th SRC’s meeting
held on 5-6th February, 2013.
3) SRCAPP11-M.Ed course already rejected as per the request of the
institution in 240th SRC’s meeting held on 9-11th of March, 2013.
4) SRCAPP43-M.P.Ed course-to process.
82
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
5) SRCAPP77-D.El.Ed course is rejected due to ban as per the
recommendation of the Union Territory Govt. of Pondicherry vide
letter dt. 14.11.2012.
Volume-02
Consideration of Appeal Cases
33
SRCAPP1367
D.El.Ed
Pratap
Educational
Society,
Prakasam
District
AP
Pratap Educational Society, K.No. 417, Ramapuram Village, Perala Post,
Chirala Taluk, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.
Pratap Educational Society, Plot No. ¼, Nawabpet Street, Chirala Village,
Post & Taluk, Prakasam District-523155, Andhra Pradesh had applied for
grant of recognition to Pratap Educational Society, K.No. 417, Ramapuram
Village, Perala Post, Chirala Taluk, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, for
D.El.Ed Course for two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act,
1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011. The
institution has submitted hard copy of the application on 03.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 02.11.2011. A reminder letter to the State
Government was sent on 14.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the
institution on 29.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on
26.03.2012, which is after 60 days.
As per sub-clause (1) of clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the applicant
institution is required to submit deficiencies to the SRC office within 60 days from
the date of receipt of communication of deficiencies, failing which the application
will be treated as rejected and closed, no extension to time will be granted and
any submissions received after 60 days will be treated as invalid and not
entertained.
The committee considered the matter and noted the issuing of deficiency
letter and institution reply to the DL after the expiry of 60 days of time limit.
“As per sub-clause (1) of clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the
applicant institutions is required to submit deficiencies to the
Southern Regional Committee Office within 60 days from the date of
receipt of communication of deficiencies, failing which the
application will be treated as rejected and closed, no extension to
time will be granted and any submission received after 60 days will
be treated as invalid and not entertained”.
In view of the above the committee after going through the reply of institution dt.
26.03.2012 & come to the conclusion that the reply is not satisfactory and not
convincing and hence, the recognition is refused.
The SRC in its 221st Meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012 decided to Refuse
and Reject the application for Recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 30/05/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection letter of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
83
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-414/2012
Appeal/1st Meeting-2013 dated 01/03/2013 stated that “…the council, noting the
fact that the reply to the deficiency letter was not submitted within the stipulated
period and reason being the required documents were not ready as admitted by
the appellant during the course of hearing, concluded that the SRC was justified
in refusing the recognition to the D.El.Ed course.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that the SRC was justified in refusing the recognition to the D.El.Ed course
accordingly the appeal is rejected and the order of the SRC is confirmed”.
34
SRCAPP883
D.El.Ed
Jhansi College
of Education,
Prakasam
District
AP
The Committed has noted the matter.
Jhansi College of Education, Plot No. 461/1, Darsi Village and Post, Darsi
Taluka and Town, Prakasam District – 523247, Andhra Pradesh.
BMR Educational and Service Society, Plot No. 461/1, Addanki Road, Karsi
Villlage and Post, Darsi Taluka and Town, Prakasam District – 532 247,
Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Jhansi College of
Education, Plot No. 461/1, Darsi Village and Post, Darsi Taluka and Town,
Prakasam District – 523247, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course of two years
duration under section 15(1)) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE on on-line on 28.09.2011 and physical application has been
received on 07.10.2011.
The said application was refused and rejected on 23.01.2012 on the ground that
“Hard Copy not submitted within time bound as per Regulation 2009, against
which the institution has preferred appeal before the Appellate Authority.
The Appellate authority vide its order dt. 18.04.2012 remands back the case to
SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per regulations. Hence,
the application was scrutinized as per the provisions contained in the NCTE
Regulations 2009.
Accordingly, a deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 21.06.2012. The
institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 25.06.2012.
The SRC in its 228th meeting of SRC held on 24th – 25th July 2012, considered
the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 10.05.2012 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under
section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Total earmarked built up area for B.Ed and for proposed D.El.Ed course
is not given.
As per the directions of SRC a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution
on 13.08.2012. The reply for show cause notice was received on 13.08.2012.
The SRC in its 230th meeting held on 16th - 17th August, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution dt.13-08-2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
84
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 03rd – 06th
September, 2012. The same was intimated to institution on 31/08/2012. The
inspection of the institution was conducted on 12/09/2012.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all
relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993,
Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the
table, the Regional Committee in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th September
2012 decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course
of two year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the
academic year 2013-14 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly
constituted selection committee as per the Norms
of NCTE/State
Government/Affiliating University and be given effect before the commencement
of the academic session.
Accordingly, a Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on 04.10.2012. The
institution has submitted its reply to LOI on 15.11.2012.
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles submitted
by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the SRC in its 236 th Meeting
held on 16th-18th December, 2012 decided that Formal Recognition be granted to
D.El.Ed., course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from the year 2013-14, subject to production of joining report of
Principal.
Accordingly, a letter was issued to the institution on 27/12/2012 with subject to
produce joining report of Principal.
The institution has submitted its reply along with joining report of the Principal on
21/12/2012 based on website information.
Meantime the institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate
authority in its order No. F.No.89-77/2012/2012Appeal/1stMeeting-2013 dated
16/04/2012 stated that “…as per the notification of the NCTE dated
31/07/2012, the Regional Committees were to communicate final decision
either granting recognition or refusing recognition for the academic
session 2012-13 on or before the 31st August, 2012.
The council also noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in their order
dated 31/01/2011 in Civil Appeal No. 1125-1128 / 2011 inter alia held that the
time schedule fixed for processing of the applications and communication of the
decision on the issue of recognition should be strictly adhered to the council
further noted that the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh has written to the SRC, NCTE on
08/08/2012 requesting them not to issue any letter of Intent/Recognition in
respect of new private D.Ed Colleges to start D.Ed course during 2012-13 in
Andhra Pradesh State as (i) it is mandatory for D.Ed colleges to have 200
working days exclusive of the period of examination and admission (ii) as only
one month is left before the commencement of the academic session 2012-13
and if any new letters of intent are issued the institutions will fail to fulfill the
NCTE Norm of 200 working days and (iii) it will also disturb the academic year
2012-13 in Andhra Pradesh. In view of the above the council concluded that the
85
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
SRC was justified in not issued letter of intent for the academic session 2012-13
and therefore, the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC
confirmed.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that the SRC was justified in issuing letter of Intent for the academic session
2013-14 and therefore the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the
SRC confirmed ”.
The Committed has noted the matter.
35
SRCAPP1305
D.El.Ed
AIM College of
Elementary
Education,
Vizianagaram
District
AP
AIM College of Elementary Education, Plot/Khasara No. 171/1, Kothapeta
Street, Village and Post, Nellimarla City and Taluk, Vizianagaram District –
535218, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Venkateswara Educational Society, Plot No. 12, Thotapalem Road,
Vizianagaram Village and Post, Vizianagaram City and Taluk, Vizianagaram
District – 535003, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to AIM
College of Elementary Education, Plot/Khasara No. 171/1, Kothapeta
Street, Village and Post, Nellimarla City and Taluk, Vizianagaram District –
535218, Andhra Pradesh for D.EL.Ed Course of two years duration under
Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee,
NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical copy received on 30.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 28.10.2011 followed by reminder on
08.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 28.12.2011 and
the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 27.02.12
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th – 31st March 2012 considered the reply
of the institution dt. 27.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for
the following:






The details of sale deed for vacant land in Sy.No. 185/11 (968
sq.yds) & reflected in other documents submitted by the institution
is not mentioned in the original application submitted for the
proposed course.
Building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized
engineer is not submitted.
The affidavit submitted is filled by black pen. Which is not
permissible as per NCTE norms.
Sy. No. 185/11 reflected in encumbrance certificate is mortgaged to
Union Bank on 11/10/2011, which is not permissible as per
Regulation.
Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office
stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the
purpose of educational institution is not submitted. Proceedings
from the revenue divisional office not submitted. In the LUC
submitted, extent of land converted is not mentioned; land
converted is for construction of building/proposed college, which is
not permissible as per regulations.
The affidavit submitted is filled up by black pen.
86
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013


Approved Building plan submitted is not in the name of the
proposed college.
Details of other course being run by the institution in the same
building/premises is not submitted.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26/04/2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 17/05/2012.
The reply of the show cause notice was placed before SRC in its 223rd Meeting
held on 29th-31st May 2012 it has decided to cause inspection under section 14
(1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as
per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the
deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 25th-29th June 2012
the same was intimated to the institution on 20/06/2012 the inspection of the
institution was conducted on 29/06/2012.
The SRC in its 227th Meeting held on 17th-19th July, 2012 considered the VT
report, VCD and all other relevant documentary evidences and deficiencies still
persist as under:

As per Encumbrance certificate, Sy.No. 185/11 is mortgaged to
Union Bank of India on 11/10/2011, which is not permissible 8 (7) (i)
of Regulations States:
As per NCTE Regulations 2009.
“No institution shall be granted recognition under these Regulations
unless the institution or society sponsoring the institution is in possession
of required land on the date of application. The land free from all
encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on lease from
Government or Government institutions for a period of not less than 30
years. In cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws the
maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State
Government or Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However,
no building shall be taken on lease for running any teacher training
course”.



Notarized proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted
for conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
In the building completion certificate submitted, date and name of the
course is not given.
Education technology lab and Language learning lab is not
adequately provided.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution
for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
87
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 13/08/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-708/2012 Appeal
/ 1st Meeting-2013A63768 dated 28/02/2013 stated that “…the council noted that
as per the provisions of para 8 (7) (i) of the NCTE Regulations, 2009, the land
has inter alia to be free from all encumbrances, the appellant has admitted that
the land was under mortgage to the union Bank of India and it was released only
on 09/05/2012. Regarding other grounds of rejection the council noted that the
CLU was obtained in the month of May, 2012 and the building plan, mentions
only the name of the sponsoring society. The appellant has admitted that the
name of the institution has not been mentioned in the building completion
certificate. in the circumstances the council concluded that the appeal deserved
to be rejected on the ground that at the time of submission of application, the
institution did not possess land meeting the conditions laid down in para (8) (7
(i)) of the NCTE regulations, 2009, and other grounds of refusal have been
rectified at the time of filing of appeal.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed”.
The Committed has noted the matter.
36
SRCAPP1323
D.El.Ed
Gayathri D.Ed
College,
Kurnool District
AP
Gayathri D.Ed College, Khasara No.404, Street No.1, Yerraguntla Village
and Post Office, Allagadda Taluka, Yerraguntla City, Kurnool District-515
510, Andhra Pradesh
Likhitheswara Educational Society, Plot No.5-147-A, High School Road,
Yerraguntla Village and Post Office, Sirivel Mandal, Sirivel City, Kurnool
District-518510, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to
Gayathri D.Ed College, Khasara No.404, Street No.1, Yerraguntla Village
and Post Office, Allagadda Taluka, Yerraguntla City, Kurnool District-515
510, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under section
14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online
on 30/09/2011 and physical application has been received in the office of
Southern Regional Committee on 30/09/2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011 followed by reminder on
14/12/2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 28.12.2011.
The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after the
stipulated time of 60 days and till date.
As per sub-clause (1) of Clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the applicant
institutions is required to submit deficiencies to the Southern Regional
Committee Office Within 60 days from the date of receipt of communication of
deficiencies, failing which the application will be treated as rejected and closed,
no extension to time will be granted and any submission received after 60 days
will be treated as invalid and not entertained.
The SRC in its 221st Meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012 considered the matter,
88
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
as the institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated
period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter and with reference to
the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind,
the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse
and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 30/05/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-449/2012
Appeal/1st Meeting-2013 A 63776 dated 28/02/2013 stated that “…the council
concluded that the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the
SRC confirmed”.
The Committed has noted the matter.
37
SRCAPP1697
D.El.Ed
Lakshmi
College of
Education,
Vizianagaram
District
AP
Lakshmi Collage of Education, Khasara No. 25-127, Street No. 10, Bobbili
Village, Post & Taluk, Vizianagaram District-535 558, Andhra Pradesh
Lakshmi Technical and Educational Society, Plot No. 13/51, 16th ward,
Bobbili Village and post, Vizianagaram District-535558, Andhra Pradesh
has applied for grant of recognition to Lakshmi Collage of Education, Survey
No. 33/2, KL Puram Street, KL Puram Village and Post, Vizianagaram
District-535 558, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course on 01/10/2011 for two
years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993 and received in the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 17.10.2011. (Dispatched by speed post
on 13.10.2011)
NCTE-Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009, it amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads as
follows:2 (B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely. 1 (1-A) (I)
the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:

The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application.

Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.

Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 6th-7th November,
2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid
on the table. The Regional committee decided to reject the application on the
89
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
following grounds.

Hard copy of application not submitted within time frame as per
Regulation 2009.
Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution on 24/01/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection letter of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-760/2012
Appeal/1st Meeting-2013 dated 01/03/2013 stated that “…the council decided
not to condone the delay in submission of the appeal and therefore
decided not to admit the appeal”.
The Committed has noted the matter.
38
SRCAPP1682
D.El.Ed
Lakshmamma
College of
Education,
Vizianagaram
District
AP
Lakshmamma Collage of Education, Khasara No. 25-127, Street No. 10,
Bobbili Village, Post & Taluk, Vizianagaram District-535 558, Andhra
Pradesh
Lakshmi Technical and Educational Society, Plot No. 13/51, 16th ward
Gowdu Streed, Bobbili Village and post, Vizianagaram District-535558,
Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to Lakshmamma Collage
of Education, Khasara No. 25-127, Street No. 10, Bobbili Village, Post &
Taluk, Vizianagaram District-535 558, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course on
01/10/2011 for two years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993
and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 17.10.2011.
(Dispatched by speed post on 13.10.2011)
NCTE-Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009, it amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads as
follows:2 (B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely. 1 (1-A) (I)
the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:

The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application.

Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.

Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 6th-7th November,
2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid
on the table. The Regional committee decided to reject the application on the
90
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
following grounds.

Not submitted within time frame as per regulations 2009.
Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution on 23/01/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection letter of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-761/2012
Appeal/1st Meeting-2013 dated 01/03/2013 stated that “…the council decided
not to condone the delay in submission of the appeal and therefore
decided not to admit the appeal”.
39
SRCAPP1640
D.El.Ed
SR College of
Elementary
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
The Committed has noted the matter.
SR College of Elementary Education, Plot No. 566, Charlapally, Nalgonda508001,
Andhra Pradesh
St. Mary Educational Society, Plot No. LIG-2, APHB Hyderabad Road,
Nalgonda Village and Post, Nalgonda District-508001, Andhra Pradesh has
applied for grant of recognition to SR College of Elemetnary Education, Plot
No. 566, Charlapally, Nalgonda-508001, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course
on 01/10/2011 for two years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993
and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 10/10/2011.
It is observed that several institutions have not submitted or dispatched hard
copies of application within 7 days of the submission of on-line. In the first instant
matters as per perusal of the file it is noted that the institution have mentioned
date of dispatch on the covering letter with application. However envelope does
not indicate date of the dispatch of the application.
2 (B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely.
The application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:

The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National
Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or
before the date of submission of online application.

Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.

Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of online application.
In this regard a letter has already been sent to the applicant institution to submit
proof of dispatch, but the institutions have not submitted proof of dispatch of the
application.
The SRC in its 216th Meeting held on 11th 12th January, 2012 considered the
matter and decided to summarily to reject the application for not establishing
91
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
proof of dispatched within 7 days.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-696/2012 Appeal
/ 1st Meeting-2013 dated 01/03/2013 stated that “…the council concluded that
there was no justification to condone the delay and therefore the appeal is
not admitted”.
40
SRCAPP539
D.El.Ed
Sri Raja
Rajeshwari
D.Ed College,
Kurnool District
AP
The Committed has noted the matter.
Sri Raja Rajeshwari D.Ed College, P.No.29/152-E-14-A, Nandyal Village &
Taluka, Kurnool District-518502, Andhra Pradesh
PMRM Educational Society, P.No.29/152-E-1, S.B.I.Colony, Nandyal Village
& Taluka, Kurnool District-518502, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of
recognition to Sri RajaRajeshwari D.Ed College, P.No.29/152-E-14-A,
Nandyal Village & Taluka, Kurnool District-518502, Andhra Pradesh for
D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act,
1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 17.09.2011 and
physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 19.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 20.09.2011 followed by reminder on
14.11.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 23.11.2011. The
institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 28.12.2011. Recommendation
from State Government is not received.
The SRC in its 216th meeting of SRC held on 11th -12th January 2012 considered
the written reply dated 28.12.2012 and other relevant documents submitted by
the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises to examine
whether the institution fulfills all the requirements as per the norms and to
ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities available at the premises for
the proposed course.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was fixed between 01.02.2012 to
04.02.2012. The same was intimated to the institution on 24.01.2012.
Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 08.02.2012.
The SRC in its 219th Meeting held on 15th-16th March, 2012 considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for the following:




Original notarized sale deed copies in English version are not
submitted.
As per VT report, in essential data sheet total built up area is only
10861 sq.ft. for the proposed D.El.Ed course. Which is less than the
NCTE norms.
In the land usage certificate submitted, it is not stated clearly whether
the land is converted from agricultural to non-agricultural or
educational purpose. Fresh Notarised land usage certificate from
Revenue Divisional Office of the Govt. is to be submitted. Proceedings
of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land
from agricultural to educational purposes.
As per encumbrance certificate submitted, the land is on lease basis to
92
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013


Narayana Educational Society in 2010. This not permissible as per
NCTE regulations.
Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards existing B.Ed &
TPT course run by the institution from the affiliating body/State Govt.
is not submitted.
Earmarked built up area for B.Ed, TPT and proposed D.El.Ed course is
not given
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 04/04/2012.
The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice even after
the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.
Keeping in view, Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as
under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils
the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time
schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee
and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly
adhered to”.
The SRC in its 226th Meeting held on 9th-10th July, 2012 considered the matter,
as the institution has not submitted reply even after stipulated period of 21 days
from the date of issue of show cause notice letter dt. 04.04.2012 and with
reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective
application of mind, the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE
Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 13/08/2012
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89791/2012Appeal/2nd Meeting-2013 dated 01/03/2013 stated that “…the council
noted that the SRC issued a show cause notice to the appellant institution
on 04/04/2012 mentioning six deficiencies with the direction to submit a
representation within a period of 21 days from the date of its isuse. The
appellant submitted their reply belatedly on 16/07/2012 which was received
on 17/07/2012. While the appellant mentioned in his reply to the show
cause notice that the delay was on account of late receipt of land usage
certificate, he did not mention his now reported illness as a cause . further, when
he was unable to reply within the stipulated period of 21 days, he did not
appraise the SRC about the delay in obtaining the documents and seek
extension of time. by the time the reply was sent, the SRC had considered the
case of the appellant institution in its meeting held on 9th and 10th july2012 and
finding that a reply to the show cause notice dated 04/04/2012 was not
submitted. decided to refuse the recognition. In these circumstances the council
concluded that the SRC was justified in refusing recognition and therefore the
93
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that the SRC was justified in refusing recognition. Accordingly the appeal is
rejected and order of SRC confirmed”.
The Committed has noted the matter.
41
SRCAPP1261
D.El.Ed
Sharvani
College of
Elementary
Teacher
Education,
Mahabubnagar
District
AP
Sharvani College of Elementary Teacher Education, Plot/Khasara No. 213,
Peddagudem Sivar Village, Wanaparthy Post, City and
Taluk,
Mahabubnagar District – 509103, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Sai Saraswathi Educational Society, Plot No.213, Peddagudem Sivar Road,
Peddagudem Post and City, Wanaparthy Taluk, Mahabubnagar District –
509103, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sharvani
College of Elementary Teacher Education, Plot/Khasara No. 213, Peddagudem
Sivar Village, Wanaparthy Post, City and Taluk, Mahabubnagar District –
509103, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of Two years duration under
Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee,
NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical copy received on 03.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 21.10.2011/ 16.12.2011. A deficiency letter
was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011. The institution has replied to the
deficiency letter on 24.02.12
The SRC in its 220th Meeting of SRC held on 30th – 31st March, 2012
considered the reply of the institution dt. 24.02.2102 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under
Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
21.04.2012.The institution has submitted its written representation on
03.05.2012.
The SRC considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 03.05.2012 and all
the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show
cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:
Accordingly Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
09.06.2012. The institution submit its written representation on 22.06.2012
The reply of the institution vide letter dt,. 22.06.2012 to the show cause notice
was duly considered and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory,
deficiencies still persist as under:

The institution has registered the land on 16.01.2012, which is after
making of of the application, which is not permissible as per NCTE
Regulations 2009.
As per NCTE Regulations 2009, conditions of grant of recognition under Rule 8
(7) (i) & (ii) is
94
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

No institution shall be granted recognition under these
Regulations unless the institution or society sponsoring the
institution is in possession of required land on the date of
application. The land free from all encumbrances could be either
on ownership basis or on lease from Government or
Government institutions for a period of not less than 30 years. In
cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws the
maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the
State Government or Union Territory Administration law shall
prevail. However, no building shall be taken on lease for running
any teacher training course.

The society sponsoring the institution shall have to ensure that
proposed teacher education institution has a well demarcated
land area as specified by the norms. The teacher education
institution shall not be allowed to have any other institution
within its demarcated area or building and shall not have any
other course(s) in its building.
The reply to the show cause notice was not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee in its 226th
Meeting held on 09th – 10th July, 2012 decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009,
to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly Rejection order was issued to the institution on 27.08.2012.
Aggrieved by the order of SRC, the institution had approached to appellate
authority.
Now, the NCTE H’qrs has passed an order dated 11.12.2012 vide order no.
F.No.89-468/2012 Appeal/10th Meeting-2012. And the Council remands back the
case directing as follows:The council noted that there was a strike in the entire Telangana region on
Telangana issue in Andhra Pradesh. A Sakal Janula Samme was called by the
people of the region and the same continued for quite a long period; the
appellant submitted a gift deed registered on 16-01-2012 for Sy No. 213/1 and
213/2 and the same land was got again registered on ownership basis on
28.04..2012, the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh vide letter dated 14.08.2012,
requested the Member Secretary, NCTE to consider the applications from the
institutions located in the Telangana Region who have applied seeking
recognition of the D.El.Ed course for the academic session 2012-13 in light of
Sakala Samme; the name of the appellant society figured in the list of the
institutions attached with the letter dated 14.08.2012 of the State Govt. of AP.
The council taking into account facts and circumstances and recommendation of
the Sate Govt. of Andhra Pradesh decided that the application of the institution
be processed by the SRC in accordance with the Regulations, as relaxed by the
NCTE Committee and to take further decision thereafter.
The SRC in its 239th Meeting held on 26th-27th February,2013 considered the
95
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and decided to further process the
application for D.El.Ed course submitted by the institution in accordance with the
Regulations.
As per the direction of SRC the application was processed,
The Committee considered the Appellate Authority order dt. 11/12/2012 and
all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under
section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to
the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, as per the norms.
42
SRCAPP619
D.El.Ed-AI
Minerva
College of
Elementary
Education, East
Godavari
District
AP
Minerva College of Elementary Education, P.No.298/2B & 300/3A,
Prathipadu Village & Taluka, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh
DSJR Educational Society, P.No.4-19, Rachapalli Main Road, Rachapalli
Village, Parthipadu Taluka, East Godavari-533430, Andhra Pradesh had
applied for grant of recognition to Minerva College of Elementary Education,
P.No.298/2B & 300/3A, Prathipadu Village & Taluka, East Godavari District,
Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed-AI course of two years duration under Section
15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online
on 23.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC
on 26.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 17.10.2011 followed by reminder on
09.01.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 20.12.2011. The
institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 23.01.2012. Recommendation
from State Government is not received.
The SRC in its 217th meeting of SRC held on 8th -9th February 2012 considered
the written reply dated 23.01.2012 and other relevant documents submitted by
the institution and decided to cause inspection at the premises to examine
whether the institution fulfills all the requirements as per the norms and to
ascertain infrastructural and instructional facilities available at the premises for
the proposed course.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was fixed between 25.02.2012 to
29.02.2012. The same was intimated to the institution on 22.02.2012.
Accordingly inspection of the institution was conducted on 26.02.2012.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April 2012, considered the VT
Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show cause Notice under section 14 of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 22.05.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered and the
reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

Building Completion certificate is not submitted in prescribed format.
96
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

Original Up to date Encumbrance certificate not submitted.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 224th
Meeting held on 14th-17th June, 2012 decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 09/01/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority order in its order No. F.No. 89563/2012Appeal/10 th Meeting-2012 dated 11/12/2012 stated that
“…the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to accept
the appeal of Minerva college of Elementary College which is
already conducting B.Ed course on the cited address. The case is
remanded back to SRC for examination of the documents furnished
by the appellant”
The SRC in its 239th meeting held on 26th-27th February 2013, considered the
Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and decided to further process the
application after examination of the documents furnished by the appellant for
D.El.Ed-Al course.
In the mean time, the institution has submitted its written representation on
31.01.2013, as per the appellate order i.e., Building Completion Certificate and
Encumbrance Certificate.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the
institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of
NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to
time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of
Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed-Al course of two year duration
with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit), subject to the appointment
of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the
Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given
effect before the commencement of the academic session.
43
SRCAPP1289
D.El.Ed
Sree Vyshanavi
D.Ed College,
Ananthapur
District
AP
Sree Vyshanavi D.Ed College, Khasara No. TS2035, Plot No. 7-264,
ananthapur Village, and post office, Ananthapur District-515 001, Andhra
Pradesh.
SLN Sree Chaitanya Education Society, Plot No. 7-246, Mallewsari Raod,
Ananthapur Village and Post Office,, Ananthapur Town, Ananthapur
District – 515 001, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sree
vyshanavi D.Ed College, Khasara No. TS2035, Plot No. 7-264, Ananthapur
Village and Post Office,, Ananthapur District – 515 001, Andhra Pradesh for
D.El.Ed course on 26.09.2011 for two years duration under Section 14(1) of the
NCTE Act, 1993 and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on
07.10.2011.
NCTE – H'qrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
97
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Regulation 2009, it amendment Notified on 26th November, 2010 which reads as
follows:2(B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely’. 1(1A)(I) the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the
following circumstances:
a) The processing fee, as provided under rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
ate of submission of online application.
b) Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.
c) Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the
course possessed land on the date of application ID s not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of online application.
SRC considered the matter in 213th Meeting of SRC held on 6th – 7th November
2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid
on the table, the Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the
following grounds:
 Not submitted within time frame as per Regulations 2009.
Accordingly, the application of Sree vyshanavi D.Ed College, Khasara No.
TS2035, Plot No. 7-264, Ananthapur Village and Post Office,, Ananthapur
District – 515 001, Andhra Pradesh for permission to D.El.Ed course was
rejected.
Accordingly rejection letter was issued to the institution on 13.01.2012
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution has approached to
Hon.ble High Court in W.P No. 21993/2012 and he Hon'ble High Court has
passed an order vide W.P No. 21993 of 2012 which reads as here under.
“the writ petition is dismissed without going into the merits of the case, with
liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternate remedy.”
The institution filed another writ appeal no. 1022 of 2012 which reads as here
under.
“we only direct the appellate authority to consider the appeal so filed by the W.P
No. within a period of two weeks from the date of filing of such appeal before
the said authority. We further make it clear that the time limit, as stipulated by
the respondents till 31.01.2012 for processing of applications filed for the
academic year 2012-13 should be extended and accordingly it is extended in
the case of the wit petitioner till the appellate authority passes an order on the
appeal of the writ petitioner and communicate the same to the writ petition.”.
The institution had approached to appellate authority.
Now, the NCTE H’qrs has passed an order dated 11.12.2012 vide order no.
F.No.89-519/2012 Appeal/10th Meeting-2012. And the Council remands back the
98
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
case.
The SRC in its 239th meeting held on 26th-27th February 2013, considered the
Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and decided to further process the
application for D.El.Ed course submitted by the institution.
As per appellate authority order the application has been processed
The Committee considered the Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and
decided to further process the application for D.El.Ed course submitted by the
institution.
The Committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 11/12/2012 and
all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show
cause Notice under section 14 of NCTE Act, for the following:

Processing fee returned to institution along with rejection letter.
Processing fee is to be submitted.

Original FDR is to be submitted.

Certified copy of registered land document is to be submitted.
photocopy of lease deed submitted but not certified, lease agreement
between three individual person and institution not from government or
government institution, which is not permissible as per regulation 2009.

Land area for D.El.Ed course is 2500 sq.mtr as per regulation 2009, but
land area of 0.20 acre (lease deed) (787.47 sq.mtr as per affidavit) which
is less as per regulation 2009.

Approved blue print of building plan is to be submitted.

Notarised Land Use Certificate/proceedings from Revenue Divisional
Officer stating that the land is converted from agricultural to non
agricultural purpose is not submitted.

Building Completion Certificate submitted in individual name, not
mentioned roofing, column no.9 mentioned for educational, teacher
training not for proposed course/college. Fresh Building Completion
Certificate is to be submitted.

Total built up area is not matching with Building Completion Certificate
and building plan.

Encumbrance Certificate not submitted.
In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee
decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the
recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the
institution to make a written representation within 21 days from the date of
99
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order
to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken
including the refusal & rejection of application for recognition, based on
the records available, with no further notice.
44
SRCAPP1201
D.El.Ed
Madasu
Bhukailasam
College of
Education,
Medak District
AP
Madasu Bhukailasam College of Education, Sy No. 543, Chitukal Village
and Post Office, Patancheru Taluka, Medak District – 506 167, Andhra
Pradesh
Dharani Educational Society, Plot No. 1-3-90/C, Geetha Nagar Village,
Jangoan Post Office and Taluka, Warangal District – 506 167, Andhra
Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Madasu Bhukailasam College
of Education, Sy No. 543, Chitukal Village and Post Office, Patancheru
Taluka, Medak District – 506 167, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two
years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern
Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has
been received in the office of SRC on 05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 22.12.2011 followed by reminder on
05.01.2012. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011 and
the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 29.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th –31st March 2012 considered the reply
of the institution dt. 29.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for
the following:






Land documents of sale deed dt.17.01.2012 is registered after the on-line
application, which is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009.
In the building completion certificate submitted, built up area is filled up
by pen, name of the course is not mentioned in column No. 9 and type of
roofing is not mentioned.
Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of
educational institution is not submitted. Proceedings from the revenue
divisional office not submitted.
In the affidavit submitted, point No. 6 is not duly filled up.
FDRs of Rs.5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a
Nationalised Bank is not submitted.
Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards other courses which
are already run by the institution from the affiliating body/State
Govt/examining body is not submitted.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 27.04.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 22.05.2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered and the
reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

Land documents of sale deed dt. 17-01-2012 is registered after the online application, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009.
100
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of
educational institution only is not submitted.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 223rd
meeting held on 29th-31st May 2012 and it has decided as per NCTE Regulations
2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of
D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 29/06/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority order in its order No. F.No. 89563/2012Appeal/10 th Meeting-2012 dated 11/12/2012 stated that
“…the Council taking into accounts facts and circumstances
and recommendation of the State Govt of Andhra Pradesh decided
that the application of the institution be processed by the SRC in
accordance with the Regulations, as relaxed by the NCTE
Committee and to take further decision thereafter ”.
The SRC in its 239th meeting held on 26th-27th February 2013, considered the
Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and decided to further process the
application for D.El.Ed course as per Regulations to take further decision.
As per decision of SRC and as per appellate authority order. The application has
been processed
The Committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 11/12/2012 and
all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under
section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to
the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, as per the norms.
45
SRCAPP1335
D.El.Ed
Geethanjali
D.Ed College,
Kadapa District
AP
Geethanjali D.Ed College, Khasara No. 25/2A, Plot No. 9-A, Street No. 01,
Vidya Nagar, Galivaripalli Post, Rajampet Taluk, Kadapa District-516115,
Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Sai Srinivasa Rural & Educational Development Society, Plot No. 9-A,
Mitaneedepalli road, Vidyanagar, Galivaripalli Post, Rajampet Taluk,
Kadapa District-516115, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition
Geethanjali D.Ed College, Khasara No. 25/2A, Plot No. 9-A, Street No. 01,
Vidya Nagar, Galivaripalli Post, Rajampet Taluk, Kadapa District-516115,
Andhra Pradesh, for D.El.Ed Course for two years duration under Section 15(1)
of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on
30.09.2011. The institution has submitted hard copy of the application on
04.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
101
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011. A reminder letter to the State
Government was sent on 16.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the
institution on 29.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on
27.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th Meeting held on 30th-31st March, 2012 considered the reply
of the institution dt. 27.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26/04/2012.
The institution has submitted written representation on 17/05/2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered and the
reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

The gift deed land document dt. 24.02.2012 is registered after the date of online application, which is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009 and
the land registered on 28/09/2011 is in individual name; which is not
permissible as per NCTE norms and also admitted by the institution in its
reply to show cause notice.

Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of
land from agricultural to educational purposes.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution
for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, refused and rejection order was issued to the institution on
28/06/2012
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority order in its order No. F.No. 89546/2012Appeal/10 th Meeting-2012 dated 11/12/2012 stated that “…the
Council concluded that the appeal deserved to be accepted. The case is
remanded to the SRC for further processing”.
The SRC in its 239th Meeting held on 26th-27th February, 2013 considered the
Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and decided to further process the
application for D.El.Ed course as per Regulations.
As per the direction of SRC the application was processed
The Committee considered the matter, reply to the show cause notice was
duly considered and noted that:

Deficiency letter reply submitted by the institution is unsigned by
the Correspondent/authorized person of the institution. Therefore all
the information given by the institution is unauthenticated.
102
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The reply to the show cause notice is unauthenticated.
46
SRCAPP1042
D.El.Ed
Vahinee
Institute of
Elementary
Teacher
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee
decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application
of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Nandhikonda Shekar Reddy Memorial Educational Society, No. 7-31,
Shanthinagar Road, Suryapet Village, Post & Taluk, Nalgoda District508213, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Vahinee
Institute of Elementary Teacher Education, No. 71, K.T. Annaram Village,
Suryapet Post & Taluk, Nalgonda District-508213, Andhra Pradesh for
D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act,
1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and
physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 03.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011 followed by reminder on
16.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011. The
institution has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on
05.03.2012.
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April 2012, considered the reply of
the institution dt. 05.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it
was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act for
the following:



In the certified copy of the land documents submitted, only 1 st page is
certified by the Sub-registrar. Original certified copy of the land
documents issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.
Original building completion certificate from competent Govt.
authorized engineer is not submitted.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name if
not given.
Details of other teacher educational programmes run by the institution
in the same building/premises is not given.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 14.05.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 07.06.2012, mentioned
as “Show Cause Notice received on 18.05.2012” in the reference and not
submitted any proof of the same.
The institution has submitted reply for Show Cause Notice after the stipulated
time of 21 days period.
The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice after the expiry of
stipulated time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.
The SRC in its 224th Meeting held on 14th – 17th June, 2012 considered the reply
of the institution, which is received on 07/06/2012, i.e., after 24 (Twenty four)
days from the date of issue of show cause notice dt. 14/05/2012 and with
reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective
application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
103
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly the application of Vahinee Institute of Elementary Teacher
Education, No. 71, K.T. Annaram Village, Suryapet Post & Taluka, Nalgonda
District-508213, Andhra Pradesh, for permission to D.El.Ed course was rejected
on 11.07.2012.
Aggrieved by the order of SRC, the institution had approached to appellate
authority.
Now, the NCTE H’qrs has passed an order dated 11.12.2012 vide order no.
F.No.89-557/2012 Appeal/10th Meeting-2012. And the Council remanded back
the case.
The SRC in its 239th Meeting held on 26th-27th February, 2013 considered the
Appellate authority’s order dt. 11-12-2012 and decided to further process the
application for D.El.Ed course submitted by the institution.
As per the decision of SRC the application was processed .
The Committee duly considered the Appellate authority order dt.
11/12/2012 and processed the application of the said institution and found
that deficiencies still persist as under:
 Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name is
not given.
 The institution in its reply stated that the building is under construction
and building completion certificate issued by the competent Govt.
Engineer is not submitted.
 Land documents submitted by the institution is not certified by subregistrar in all the pages,
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee
decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application
of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
47
SRCAPP1351
M.Ed
Vasavi College
of Education,
Puducherry
PU
Vasavi College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 118/7-A. 293/4,5,6, Street.
No. NH 45-A, Madagadipet Post, Madagadipet Village, Mannadipet
Commune Taluk, Puducherry District-605107, Pondicherry.
Vasavi College of Education Vasavi Trust, Madagadipet Village & Post,
Mannadipet Taluk, Puducherry District-605107, Pondicherry had applied for
grant of recognition to Vasavi College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 118/7-A.
293/4,5,6, Street. No. NH 45-A, Madagadipet Post, Madagadipet Village,
Mannadipet Commune Taluk, Puducherry District-605107, Pondicherry, for M.Ed
Course for One year duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
104
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011. The institution has
submitted hard copy of the application on 05.10.2011.
The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 02.11.2011. A reminder letter to the State
Government was sent on 23.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the
institution on 07.12.2011. The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on
08.02.2012.
The SRC in its 218th meeting held on 28th February 2012 decided to issue a
Show Cause Notice to the institution.
Accordingly, Show cause notice was
issued to the institution on 26.03.2012. The institution submitted its reply on
18.04.2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered and the
reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:




NAAC certificate is not submitted.
Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for
conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
In the building completion certificate submitted, type of roof is not
mentioned and parking shed with Asbestos sheet roofing is also
included in the built up area.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve
fund
from
a
Nationalized
Bank
in
favour
of
Society/college/institution name if not given.
Reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory & unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 222nd
meeting held on 09th -10th May, 2012 decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 11.06.2012.
The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide
order no. F.No.89-494/2012 Appeal/1st Meeting-2013 dtd. 28.02.2013 has stated
as follows:“ after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council
concluded that the appeal deserved to be rejected on the ground that the
appellant did not have NAAC accreditation at the time of application and
therefore the order of the SRC be confirmed”.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed
against”.
The committee has noted the matter.
48
APS09112
Don Bosco College of Education, Sy. No.647, Don Bosco Nagar, SLBC
105
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
B.Ed
Don Bosco
College of
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
Colony, Nalgonda District – 508004, Andhra Pradesh
The Chandur Don Bosco Society, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh had
applied for grant of recognition to Don Bosco College of Education, Sy. No.647,
Don Bosco Nagar, SLBC Colony, Nalgonda District – 508004, Andhra Pradesh
for B.Ed Course of one year duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act 1993
to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 14/11/2007..
The application was processed and the inspection of the institution was carried
out on 09/05/2008. The visiting team report was placed before SRC in its 161st
Meeting held on06th-07th August, 2008. The committee considered the visiting
team report and decided to serve show cause notice.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26/08/2008.
The applicant institution had submitted its written representation dated
29.08.2008 to SRC, NCTE. The said representation of the institution as well as
other documents with VTR and videography were duly considered by the
Southern Regional Committee in its 163rd meeting held on 29th – 30th August
2008 and decided to seek clarification from the institution.
The clarification letter was issued to the Institution on 22.09.2008 to submit the
reply within a period of 30 days from the date of issued of this letter. In response
to clarification letter, the institution submitted written representation on
06.10.2008. The said representation of the institution as well as other
documents with VTR were again duly considered by the southern regional
committee in its 167th meeting held on 17th –18th November 2008 which came to
the conclusion that recognition to the said institution be refused for the following
reasons:



The management has not submitted certificate from the concerned
affiliating university of B.Ed course stating that there is no other
colleges/courses running in the same building/complex.
The building plan and building completion certificates have been
approved without specifying date of approval and the Mandal
Revenue Officer is not competent authority for approval of the
building plan. Also the building was constructed five years back as
per lease documents. But approval details are not furnished.
No exclusive land, built up space infrastructural and instructional
facilities are provided for the proposed D.Ed and B.Ed courses.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 16/12/2008.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-476/2012
Appeal/11th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that “…the council noted that
in the refusal order dated 16/12/2008 it was clearly mentioned that the institution
can prefer an appeal to the council in terms of section 18 of thNCTE Act. the
appellant has not stated twhen their administrative officer made enquiries and on
what date the refusal order was received. The procedure for appeal is in public
domain vague and are not supported by any document. The reported foreign
assignment of the office bearers of the society has no relevance. In the
circumstances, the council decided not to condone the delay and therefore the
106
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
appeal is not admitted.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council decided not
to condone the delay and therefore the appeal is not admitted.
The committee has noted the matter.
49
SRCAPP1423
D.El.Ed
Jesus and Mary
College of
Diploma in
Education,
Visakhapatnam
District
AP
Jesus and Mary College of Diploma in Education, Khasara No. 137, Plot No.
130/6 and 130/7, Sowbhagyarayapuram Colony, V. Juttada Post, Pendurthi
Taluk, Visakhapatnam City and District – 531173, Andhra Pradesh
Jesus and Mary Educational Society, Plot No. 39 27 44/7, VUDA Layout,
Visakhapatnam Village and Taluk, Madhavadhara Post, Visakhapatnam City and
District – 530018, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Jesus
and Mary College of Diploma in Education, Khasara No. 137, Plot No. 130/6 and
130/7, Sowbhagyarayapuram Colony, V. Juttada Post, Pendurthi Taluk,
Visakhapatnam City and District – 531173, Andhra Pradesh for D.EL.Ed Course
of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical copy
received on 07.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08.11.2011 followed by reminder on
29.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The
institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 05.03.2012.
The SRC in its 221st Meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012 considered the reply of
the institution dt. 05.03.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it
was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for
the following:

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is
not submitted. The land document of sale deed dt. 31.05.2001 on Sy.No.
130/6 & 130/7 is on lease deed for 30 years, which is not permissible as
per NCTE Regulations 2009.

Encumbrance certificate submitted is not reflecting the Societies name.

Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office
stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the
purpose of educational institution only is not submitted. Proceedings
of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from
agricultural to educational purposes.

Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalized Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name if
not given.

Details of other teacher educational programmes run by the institution
in the same building/premises is not given.
107
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Reply to the deficiency letter is incomplete and not satisfactory.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 16/05/2012.
The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice even after
the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.
Keeping in view, Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as
under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils
the conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time
schedule fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee
and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly
adhered to”.
The committee considered the matter, as the institution has not submitted reply
even after stipulated period of 21 days from the date of issue of show cause
notice letter dt. 16.05.2012 and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 226th
Meeting held on 09th-10th July, 2012 decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE
Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 13/08/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89829/2012Appeal/3rd Meeting-2013 dated 06/03/2013 stated that “…the council
noted that the submission of the appeal was delayed by two months and ten
days beyond the prescribed time limit of 60days. The reason adduced for delay
is the health problem of the Secretary of the appellant institution. the appellant
enclosed a copy of the certificate dated 13/12/2012 issued by Deepthi Nursing
Home Visakhapatnam, to the effect that due to surgery the Secretary, Jesus and
Mary Educational Society was hospitalized from 22/05/2012 to 13/12/2012. On
being asked why any other office bearer of the society could not make an appeal
in time, the appellant could not give any satisfactory reply the council also noted
that the appeal bears the signatures of two persons. On the grounds of refusal
also the council noted that no reply to the show cause notice dated 16/05/2012
was sent.
In view of the above position the council decided not to condone the delay and
therefore the appeal is not admitted.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council decided not
to admit the appeal for consideration.
The committee has noted the matter.
108
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
50
SRCAPP703
D.El.Ed
Narketpally
College of
Elementary
Teacher
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
Narketpally College of Elementary Teacher Education, Sy. No. 469,
Charlapally Village and Post, Nalgonda City and Taluk, Nalgonda District –
508001, Andhra Pradesh.
St. Mary Educational Society, Plot No. LIG 2, APHB, Hyderabad Road,
Nalgonda Village and Post, Nalgonda City and Taluka, Nalgonda District –
508001, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Narketpally
College of Elementary Teacher Education, Sy. No. 469, Charlapally Village
and Post, Nalgonda City and Taluk, Nalgonda District – 508001, Andhra
Pradesh for D.EL.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the
NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on
26.09.2011 and physical copy received on 29.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08.11.2011/ 03.01.2012. A deficiency letter
was issued to the institution on 27.12.2011.
The Southern Regional Committee in its 221st Meeting held on 19th – 20th April
2012, considered the reply of the institution dt. 05.03.2102 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under
Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for the following:





In the building plan submitted, total earmarked land area & total built up
area is not given and plan is not in favour of the college name.
Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office
stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the
purpose of Educational institution only is not submitted. Proceedings
of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from
agricultural to educational purposes.
Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted.
Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards B.Ed & D.Ed
courses which are already run by the institution from the affiliating
body/State Govt/examining body is not submitted.
Total earmarked built up area for the existing courses and proposed
course is not given.
Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 15.05.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation dt. 02.06.2012 received in
the office of SRC on 04.06.2012.
The SRC in its 226th Meeting held on 09th-10th July, 2012 considered the request
of the institution vide letter dt. 21.06.2012 for postponement of inspection of their
college cor D.El.Ed course and decided not to give permission and with
reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective
application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 16/08/2012.
109
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-699/2012
Appeal/14th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that “…the council noted
that the SRC in its 224th Meeting held on 14th-16th June, 2012 decided to
case a composite inspection of the appellant institution which has been
running B.Ed course with an intake of 200 seats and proposed to run the
D.El.Ed course and informed the institution that an inspection would be
conducted during July 4-8, 2012. The institution in their letters dated 21/06/2012
and 02/07/2012 sought postponement of inspection until they give their consent
and readiness information. The appellant did not mention the death of her
mother and fracture of her father as reasons for postponement of inspection. In
their subsequent letter dated 13/07/2012 only (which is not in the file of SRC)
they mentioned these reasons. The file of SRC does not contain the letters dated
02/07/2012 and 13/07/2012. However, the appellant in her appeal has pleaded
that due to bereavement that took place on 10/06/2012 (for which a death
certificate dated 12/07/2012 is enclosed). They were pre- occupied.
Since, the SRC had considered the request of the institution and decided against
postponement of inspection, the council concluded that SRC was justified in
refusing recognition.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council decided to
reject the appeal and the order of the SRC is confirmed.
The committee has noted the matter.
51
SRCAPP1408
D.El.Ed
Holy Faith
College of
D.Ed,
Visakhapatnam
District
AP
Holy Faith College of D.Ed, Plot No. 46, G S Agra Street, G.S Agraharam
Village, Gandigundam Post, Anandapuram Taluka, Visakhapatnam City
and District- 531173, Andhra Pradesh
Holy
Faith
Minority
Educational
Society,
Plot
No.45-35-27,
Jagannadhapuram Road,
Visakhapatnam Village and Taluk,
Akkayyapalem Post, Visakhapatnam City and District-530016, Andhra
Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Holy Faith College of D.Ed,
Plot No. 46, G S Agra Street, G.S Agraharam Village, Gandigundam Post,
Anandapuram Taluka, Visakhapatnam City and District- 531173, Andhra
Pradesh for D.EL.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the
NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on
30.09.2011 and physical copy received on 07.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08.11.2011/ 23.12.2011. A deficiency letter
was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has replied to the
deficiency letter on 05.03.12
The SRC in its 221st Meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012 considered the reply of
the institution dt. 05.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it
was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for
the following:
110
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is
not submitted. Notarized English version of the certified copy land
documents not submitted.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt.
authorized engineer is not submitted. In the BCC submitted, column
No. 9 is not duly filled up for course/college name.

Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalized Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name if
not given.

Details of other teacher educational programmes run by the institution
in the same building/premises is not given.
Reply to the deficiency letter is incomplete and not satisfactory.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 16/05/2012.
The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice even after
the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.
Keeping in view, Supereme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as
under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the
conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The
Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted
recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and
the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the
application by the Regional Committee and communication of the
decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to”.
The SRC in its 226th Meeting held on 9th-10th July, 2012 considered the matter,
as the institution has not submitted reply even after stipulated period of 21 days
from the date of issue of show cause notice letter dt. 16.05.2012 and with
reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective
application of mind, the SRC in is 226th Meeting held on 09th-10th July, 2012
decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the
application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 13/08/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89830/2012Appeal/3rd Meeting-2013 dated 06/03/2013 stated that “…the council
noted that the submission of the appeal was delayed by two months and
ten days beyond the prescribed time limit of 60days. The reason adduced
for delay is the health problem of the Secretary of the appellant institution.
The appellant submitted a certificate dated 05/12/2012 from Abhaya
Nursing Home, Visakhapatnam to the effect that the Secretary of Holy Faith
Minority Educational Society underwent a major surgery for left kidney
111
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
transplantation under their supervision from 11/05/2012 to 05/12/2012. On
being asked why any other office bearer of the society could not make an
appeal in time, the appellant could not give any satisfactory reply the
council also noted that the appeal bears the signatures of two persons. On
the grounds of refusal also the council noted that no reply to the show
cause notice dated 16/05/2012 was sent.
In view of the above position the council decided not to condone the delay
and therefore the appeal is not admitted.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council decided not
to admit the appeal for consideration.
The committee has noted the matter.
52
SRCAPP1720
D.El.Ed
Nauman
College of
Elementary
Teacher
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education for Women, Sy No.
359m NH 09, Kodad Village and Post Office, Kodad Taluka and City,
Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh.
Nauman Educational Society, NH-09, Kodad Village and Post Office,
Kodad Taluka and City, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh had applied
for grant of recognition to Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education
for Women, Sy No. 359m NH 09, Kodad Village and Post Office, Kodad Taluka
and City, Nalgonda District, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course online on
01.10.2011 for two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993
and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 10.10.2011.
NCTE – H'qrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009 and amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads
as follows:2(B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely.” 1(1-A)
(I) the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:



The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National
Council for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or
before the date of submission of online application.
Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.
Copy of the registered land documents issued by the
competent authority indicating that the society. Institution
applying for the Course possessed land on the date of
application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of
online application.
The SRC considered the matter in its 213th Meeting of SRC held on 06th – 07th
November, 2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other
related documents. NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to
time laid on the table. The Regional Committee decided to reject the application
on the following grounds:
112
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

Not submitted within time frame as per Regulation 2009.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 19.01.2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs. The appellate authority in its order dated 11.05.2012 remands back
the case of Nauman College of Elementary Teacher Education for Women,
Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as
indicated. Meanwhile, the institution was submitted a letter dt. 12.05.2012 which
was received in the office of SRC on 15.05.2012 along with a DD of Rs. 40,100/and requested to process the application.
The SRC in its 226th meeting held on 09th -10th July, 2012 noted and considered
the the Council order dt. 18.04.2012 and other relevant documents and decided
to further process the file for necessary action.
As per the direction of the SRC the application was processed and placed in
229th meeting held on 30th-31st July, 2012 considered the Appellate authority
order dt. 18/04/2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
As per the information of the website the institution has submitted written
representation on 21/08/2012.
The SRC in its 231st meeting held on 22nd –23rd August 2012 considered the
reply of the institution dt.21-08-2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 03rd - 05th
September, 2012. The same was intimated to institution on 31/08/2012. The
inspection of the institution conducted on 05/09/2012.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012 considered the
reply of the VT Report and all other relevant documents and decided to issue
LOI.
Accordingly, Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on 05.10.2012. The
institution has submitted written representation on 16.10.2012.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 decided that
Formal Recognition be granted to D.El.Ed., course of two year duration with an
annual intake of 50 (Fifty only) students from the session 2013-14.
Accordingly, Formal Recognition order was issued to the institution vide
no.F.No.SRCAPP1720/D.El.Ed/AP/2012/47488 dated 29/11/2012 issue for
2013-14
Aggrieved by the formal recognition order of SRC the institution preferred an
appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.8906/2013 Appeal/3rd Meeting-2013 dated 06/03/2013 stated that “…the council
113
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
noted that the SRC, in accordance with the provisions of the NCTE
Regulations, processed the application and finally granted recognition on
29/11/2012 for the academic session 2013-14. This order is also in
consonance with the request made by the Govt. of Andhra Pradesh,
School Education Deptt to the SRC regarding grant of recognition to new
institutions for th4e academic year 2013-14 only. In the circumstances the
council concluded that the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of
the SRC granting recognition for the academic session 2013-14 confirmed.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council
decided to reject the appeal and hence the order of the SRC granting
recognition for the academic session 2013-14 is confirmed.
Note: - Formal recognition was issue for 2013-14 on 29/11/2012, the institution
preferred an appeal and the appellate authority in its order dated. 06/03/2013
decided to reject the appeal and hence the order of the SRC granting recognition
for the academic session 2013-14 is confirmed.
The committee has noted the matter.
53
SRCAPP1476
D.El.Ed
Sana D.Ed
College,
Kurnool District
AP
Sana D.Ed College, Khasara No. 10/543/18/1, Near RTC, Koilakuntla Village
and Post Office, Koilapuntla Taluka and City, Kurnool District - 518 134,
Andhra Pradesh
Gulzare Ahmad Educational Society, Plot No. 1-80-B, Rangaraj Peta Road,
Koilakuntla Village and Post Office, Koilakuntla Taluka and City, Kurnool District
- 518 134, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sana D.Ed
College, Khasara No. 10/543/18/1, Near RTC, Koilakuntla Village and Post
Office, Koilapuntla Taluka and City, Kurnool District - 518 134, Andhra Pradesh
for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act,
1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and
physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 09.11.2011 / 22.12.2011 (Reminder). A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has
replied to the deficiency letter on 29.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th-31st March, 2012 considered the reply
of the institution dt. 29.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
decided to serve show cause notice. Accordingly, show cause notice was
issued to the institution on 30.04.2012. The institution submitted its written
representation on 18.05.2012.
The SRC in its 225th meeting held on 26th-27th June 2012 considered the reply of
the institution dt.18-05-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to
cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the
institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly
rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 16th to 20th July, 2012. The
114
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
same was intimated to the institution on 11.07.2012. The inspection of the
institution was conducted on 22.07.2012.
The SRC in its 229th Meeting held on 30th-31st July, 2012 considered the VT
report, VCD and other relevant documentary evidences of the institution and the
deficiencies still persist as under:



As per VT report, the size of the multipurpose hall is only 900 sq.ft.
which is less than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms.
As per VTR, Language learning lab is not available.
As seen from VCD, the building is incomplete and is in construction
stage only. Steps to the floors are not yet constructed and shutters to
doors and windows are not provided/fixed.
Regulation 8 (10) states:
At the time of inspection, the building of the institution shall be complete in
the form of a permanent structure on the land possessed by the institution
in terms of sub-regulation (7) of Regulation 8, equipped with all necessary
amenities and fulfilling all such requirements as prescribed in the norms
and standards. The applicant institution shall produce the original
completion certificate issued by the competent Government Authority or
local body authority, approved building plan in proof of the completion of
building and built up area and other documents to the visiting team for
verification. No temporary structure or asbestos roofing shall be allowed in
the institution, even if it is in addition to the prescribed built up area.

As per VCD, the proposed institution is located in a commercial
complex, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 229th
Meeting held on 30th-31st July, 2012 decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to
refuse and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed
course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 27/08/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89726/2012Appeal/15th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that “…the council
noted that the appellant institution has admitted that the building was completed
during the period from July to September, 2012, that is after the inspection. The
Photographs and VCD prepared after the inspection cannot be accepted. In view
of the above mentioned facts the council concluded that there was no
justification to accept the appeal.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that the appeal be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed.
115
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The committee has noted the matter.
54
SRCAPP1059
D.El.Ed
Kafeel Peer
Naqi College of
Elementary
Education,
Vizianagaram
District
AP
Kafeel Peer Naqi College Of Elementary Education, Gantyada Village and
Mandal, Vizianagaram District , Andhra Pradesh – 535215
Kafeel Peer Naqi Health and Educational Society ,G1, (Ground Floor),
Vivekanada Colony,Cantonment, Vizianagaram Andhrapradesh – 535003
had applied for grant of recognition toKafeel Peer Naqi College of
Elementary Education,Gantyada Village and Mandal,Vizianagaram District ,
Andhra Pradesh – 535215 for D.EI.Ed Course of two years duration under
Section 14(1)of the NCTE Act,1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE
online on 29/9/2011 and Physical application has been received in the office of
SRC on 30/9/2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of the application was sent to the
State Government for Recommendation on 1/11/2011 followed by reminder
on 8/12/2011. Deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 28/12/2011. The
Institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 28/2/2012
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th-31st March, 2012 considered the
written reply of the institution vide letter dt.28/02/2012 and other relevant
documents and decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution
fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme,
subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 23rd-27th April, 2012
the same was intimated to the institution on 13/04/2012.
Meantime, the institution has submitted a letter dated 02/05/2012 received on
07/05/2012 stating that “…. Accordingly, to the management request, we
have already acquired the land 2,500 sq.mts to the newly established
college named as Kafeel Peer Naqi College of Elementary teacher
Education with reference number: 40262 we take permission form the state
government to establish the college on the agricultural land to Utilize for
the educational purpose. We take permission form the AP Electricity office.
Gantyada for redirecting the agricultural service wire out side from the
college land and paid the necessary feed for redirecting and changed the
direction far from the college premises.
The ground work was already completed and at present we are raising the
ground pillers. So to complete the ground floor at least three months time
is needed. The time is prolonged because of the permissions form state
governments, building plan approval, acquisition of own land, other
necessary certificates from notary, Encumbrance Certificate, Utilization
certificates etc.
At this stage we received the inspection letter form your office. We are a
confused situation because our building is yet to complete.
Hence we request you to postpone the college inspection for three months
and after completion of the college building, w4e send the building
116
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
completion certificate along with the requisition for appoint the inspection
of visiting team. Until then we oblige you to postpone the inspection”.
As admitted by the institution the building is still under construction and
incomplete. As per NCTE regulation building must be ready on the date of
visit/application.
The SRC in its 223rd Meeting held on 29th-31st May, 2012 considered the request
of the institution vide letter dt. 02/05/2012 and decided not to allow
postponement of inspection of the institution for three months time & for
completion of the building and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution
for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 06/07/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-502/2012
Appeal/10th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that “…the council noted
that the SRC by their letter dated 13/04/2012 informed the institution that
an inspection would be conducted during the period 23rd to 27th April, 2012.
The institution in their letter dated 02/05/2012 requested the SRC for
postponement of inspection by three months, enabling them to complete
the construction of ground floor.
The council noted that the SRC had communicated the period of inspection to
the institution. the institution requested for postponement of inspection after the
expiry of the inspection period. The council further noted that an applicant
institution must complete its building before the date of inspection.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that there is no ground to accept the appeal. Hence, the appeal is rejected and
the order of SRC is confirmed.
The committee has noted the matter.
55
SRCAPP882
D.El.Ed
Vishwam D.Ed
College,
Kurnool District
AP
Vishwam D.Ed College, Khasara No. 50, 62, 63, Dupadu Village,
Lakshmipuram Post Office, KallurTaluka, Kurnool District – 518 218,
Andhra Pradesh.
Vishwam Educational Society, Plot No. 203, Alankar Plaza Street, Kurnool
Village and Post Office, Kurnool Taluka and City, Kurnool District – 518 001,
Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Vishwam D.Ed College,
Khasara No. 50, 62, 63, Dupadu Village, Lakshmipuram Post Office,
KallurTaluka, Kurnool District – 518 218, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.EdCourse of
two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern
Regional Committee, NCTE online on 28.09.2011 and physical application has
been received in the office of SRC on 30.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011/07.02.2011 (Reminder). A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 28.12.2011. The institution has
117
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
replied to the deficiency letter on 16.02.2012.
The SRC in its 219th meeting held on 15th-16th March 2012, considered the reply
of the institution vide letter dt. 16.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1)
of NCTE Act.

The institution has submitted approved building plan at the time of on
line application and another building plan approved by competent
authority for the deficiency letter issued, both are not tallying each with
respect to Sy.Nos, Built up area, Plot area, Location and total
earmarked area & both plans are for different buildings. The institution
has not mentioned where the course is proposed to be run.

Notarised land usage certificate from Revenue Divisional Office of the
Govt, is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not
submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to educational
purposes.

As per the proposal submitted by the institution, the proposed course
D.El.Ed is to be run in Sy.NO. 50, 62 & 63 of Dupadu Village, whereas
already another Technical Course is running In the same Sy.No. 50, 62
& 63. Which is not permissible as per NCTE norms & Regulations.

The survey numbers mentioned in building plan submitted is not
matching with building completion certificate, land usage certificate,
Affidavit and land documents.

The applicant Smt. S. Vijayalakshmamma, who has applied for the
present course SRCAPP872 in Plot No. 203, Alankar Plaza, Kurnool, the
same applicant had applied for another application SRCAPP878 for
D.El.Ed course in the same Address.
Address and Telephone
No./Mobile numbers mentioned in the both the applications are one and
the same. As per trust deed societies of both course are in same
address, i.e., D.No. 8-11-1, Srinivasa Nagar, Allagadda-518 543, Andhra
Pradesh. The President, Vice President, Secretary, and members of the
Societies are one and the same. Which is not permissible as per NCTE
regulations 2009.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 04.04.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 19.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd Meeting held on 09th-10th May, 2012 considered the reply of
the institution dt. 19.04.2012 and decided to permit closure of the D.El.Ed
(SRCAPP882) course applied in the same session 2012-13, as per the request
of the institution and and with reference to the totality of information collected &
based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE
Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 25/06/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
118
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-450/2012
Appeal/10th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that “…the council noted that
while replying to the show cause notice dated 04/04/2012, the institution on
19/04/2012 submitted that their application (SRCAPP882) be kept in abeyance
as they had applied for two courses in the same session 2012-13. Apparently,
they did so to get recognition for the other course (SRCAPP878). The council
further noted that the SRC has already accorded recognition for the said course.
the SRC acceded to their request and permitted them to withdraw their
application.
After perusal of relevant documents such as appeal memorandum affidavit and
taking into consideration the oral arguments, the council concluded that the SRC
was justified in refusing recognition. Accordingly, the appeal is rejected and the
order of SRC dated 25/06/2012 is confirmed.
The committee has noted the matter.
56
SRCAPP1457
D.El.Ed
Neelam
Sanjeeva
Reddy College
of Education,
Hyderabad
District
AP
Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy College of Education, Plot No. 1/5A, Troop Bazar
Jambagh, Street no. 5-1-424, Hyderabad Village and City, Jambagh Post,
Nampally Taluk, Hyderabad District, Andhra Pradesh - 500095
Vivek Vardhini Education Society, 5-1-424, Hyderabad Village and City,
Jambagh Post, Nampally Taluk, Hyderabad District, Andhra Pradesh 500095 had applied for grant of recognition to Neelam Sanjeeva Reddy
College of Education, Plot No. 1/5A, Troop Bazar Jambagh, Street no. 5-1424, Hyderabad Village and City, Jambagh Post, Nampally Taluk,
Hyderabad District, Andhra Pradesh - 500095 for D.El.Ed Course of one year
duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical application has been
received in the office of SRC on _03.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 21.10.2011/16.12.2011 (Reminder).A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on SRC 29.12.2011.
The institution has not submitted reply to the deficiency letter even after
stipulated period of 60 days and till date.
As per sub-clause (1) of Clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the applicant
institutions is required to submit deficiencies to the Southern Regional
Committee Office Within 60 days from the date of receipt of communication of
deficiencies, failing which the application will be treated as rejected and closed,
no extension to time will be granted and any submission received after 60 days
will be treated as invalid and not entertained.
The SRC in its 221st Meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012 considered the matter,
as the institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated
period of 60 days from the date of issue of deficiency letter and with reference to
the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind,
the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse
and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 30/05/2012.
119
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-441/2012
Appeal/12th Meeting-2012 dated 12/03/2013 stated that “…the council noted that
a deficiency letter dated 29/12/2011 mentioning a number of deficiencies was
issued to the appellant with the direction to submit a reply within a period of 60
days. A belated reply to the deficiency letter was submitted on 18/05/2012, which
was late by more than 4 months. The institution has admitted that they could not
submit the reply on time due to some administrative problems with their
management. The council concluded that the SRC was justified in refusing
recognition. The SRC in their 221st Meeting held on 20-21st April, 2012 had
already refused recondition.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that there is no justification to accept the appeal. Hence, the appeal is rejected
and the order of SRC is confirmed.
The committee has noted the matter.
57
APS08415
D.T.Ed
Kavingar
Kolanji Teacher
Training
Institute,
Perambalur
TN
Kavingar Kolanji Teacher Training Institute, T.Pzjur Road, Jayankondam
Taluk, Perambalur-621802, Tamilnadu
Kavingar Kolanji Teacher Training Institute, T.Pzjur Road, Jayankondam Taluk,
Perambalur-621802, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for D.T.Ed Course
on 21.02.2007. The institution was granted recognition on 06.11.2007 with an
annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3
years.
SRC considered the letter no. 6800-2/C3/2008 dtd. 19.06.2008 of the State
Government of Tamilnadu referred above along with the application file of the
institution in its 161st meeting held on 06th-07th August, 2008 and decided to
issue notice under section 17 of NCTE Act informing the deficiencies pointed out
in the above said letter. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution on
24.10.2008.
The institution had submitted its written representation on
28.11.2008.
The SRC in its 169th meeting held on 12th-13th January, 2009 decided that the
compliance received from the respective institutions shall be referred to the State
Government for their considered response and for necessary action.
Accordingly, the reply received by the institution in to was enclosed and
communicated to DTERT for considered response and necessary action
on 04.03.2009.
A letter dtd. 11.03.2009 has been received from the institution regarding change
of address from the building situated at T. Pazhur Road, Jayankondam,
Tamilnadu to building at Krishnanagar, Chidambaram Road, Jayankondam,
Tamilnadu.
SRC considered the letter dt. 11.03.2009 of the institution, wherein, it has
requested to issue the erratum of Change of address from T. Palur Road, to
Krishnanagar, Chidambaram Road, Jankondam, Tamilnadu. The SRC perused
the application file of the institution and observed that from the initial stages of
120
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
making application to grant of recognition, the address mentioned by the
institution was T. Palur Road, Jayamkondam and as per records, the inspection
was also carried out at T. Palur Road only. Further, the State Government of
Tamilnadu has also complained that the institution is not run in the address of
the recognition order of the NCTE. Whereas the institution in reply has also not
specified any reason for change of address and has only stated that there is a
Court specific order. Now, the institution without any reason seems to have
shifted the institution from T. Palur Road, Jayamkondam to Krishnanagar,
Chidambaram Road, Jayamkondam.
The SRC in its 175th meeting held on 13th-14th May, 2009 took serious view of
the action of the institution for shifting the institution without obtaining prior
permission from SRC, NCTE and thus decided to issue Notice under Section 17,
calling for reasons for shifting the institution from the address where recognition
was granted for D.T.Ed. course. Accordingly, notice was issued to the institution
on 12.06.2009. The institution has not yet submitted written representation.
A court order dt. 30.11.2011 I W.P. No. 36565 of 2007 and M.P. Nos. 1 to 3 of
2007 filed by Kavingar Kolanji Teacher Training Institute reads as follows:
While declining to grant the relief as sought for in the petition, opportunity is
granted to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation to the SRC of NCTE
and if any such representation is received, the second respondent (SRC,
NCTE) shall depute a team of inspecting officers to inspect the Kavingar
Kolanji Teacher Training Institute and shall also ensure that in the said
inspection team, the officers who formed part of the earlier team shall not form
part of the new team and based on their report, the SRC of NCTE shall take a
decision on the representation of the petitioner. It is needless to say that
simultaneously, the inspecting team shall also visit, the education institution of
the petitioner so as to ensure that they have fulfilled the requirement under the
provisions of NCTE Act. In the result, the writ petition is disposed of with
directions. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
The SRC in its 217th meeting held on 08th-09th February, 2012 considered the
Court direction and decided to cause inspection of the institution to verify the
fulfillment of infrastructural and instructional facilities as per NCTE regulations,
on fresh payment of Rs. 40000/-, under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The inspection
of the institution was fixed between 01st to 03rd March, 2012. The same was
intimated to the institution on 25.02.2012. The inspection of the institution was
conducted on 10.03.2012. The institution has not submitted the inspection
fee for Rs. 40,000/The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09th-10th May 2012 considered the VT
Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve
Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act, for the following:

The Institution was granted recognition in temporary premises to
run B.Ed course on 06.11.2007 with a condition that it should shift to
its own permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 06.11.2010.
The Institution is still running in temporary premises and has not
shifted to new premises even after a lapse of more than 4 years and
05 months.
121
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013






















As per VTR, the management has not shifted to own building and on
a whole was very indifferent in submitting records related to land,
building and other documents.
As per VTR, the management was not interested in inspection
conducted by NCTE.
The institution has not submitted the inspection fee of Rs. 40000/-.
As per VT report, total built up area is only 4760.80 sq.ft, which is
inadequate for the course being run and as per NCTE norms, 16000
sq.ft. of built up area is required.
Original building completion certificate from competent Govt.
authorized engineer is not submitted.
Sy.No. mentioned in land documents are not tallying with building
plan submitted.
Non-encumbrance certificate from sub-registrar is not submitted.
Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office
stating that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the
purpose of educational institution only is not submitted.
Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for
conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve
fund from a Nationalised Bank in joint names were not submitted.
The Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in the prescribed format with
notary attestation is to be submitted.
Address of the land as per Questionnaire is not duly filled up.
As per VTR, the size of the multipurpose hall is only 1212 sq.ft,
which is less than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft. as per NCTE
norms.
As per VTR, the institution has not subscribed for journals to the
library, as per NCTE norms.
As per VT report, the building has two floors, the ground floor is
partitioned temporarily with cement bricks for class rooms, hall,
labs, library, principal and faculty rooms are inadequate in area as
per NCTE. The first floor is roofed with asbestos sheets, which is
not permissible as per NCTE norms.
As per VTR, language learning lab is not available.
As per VTR, furniture provided in the labs, Principal rooms, staff
room etc are inadequate and needs to be strengthened. No labeling
of the college on any of the furniture and other items.
As per VTR, equipments in the Psychology lab is sealed in covers,
appears to be old and are not been used and some of the
equipments are already damaged. No seating arrangements are
made in the lab for conducting tests.
As per VTR, Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened.
As per VTR, materials available in the other lab and Physical
education lab etc. is old and damaged. Needs to be strengthened.
As per VTR, Details of bills and entry register towards purchase of
equipments to each laboratory is not submitted. Details of
equipments in each laboratory is not submitted.
As per VTR, the management has not created any website so far.
As per VTR, Details of bills and entry register therein towards books
in library title wise is not submitted.
122
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

The seating capacity in the library is for 20 students only, which is
inadequate as per NCTE norms.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 11.06.2012.
The reply of the institution vide its letter dtd. 16.07.2012 has stated that “ we
proposed start the institution at T. Pazhur Road, Jayankondam only. That’s why
we mentioned the permanent address for further recognition. But the state Govt.
has not accepted the future building mentioning the temporary address as per
the state Govt’s direction.
As per the direction of the SRC-NCTE , we were in a position to shift
within 3 years. But our institution got state Recognition by 20.06.2009 itself. So,
there was no classes from 06.11.2007 to 20.06.2009. The institution kept locked
upto 20.06.2009.
Now, we are constructing a new building in the T. Pazhur Road,
Jayankondam site. This is reason for not shifting within the prescribed time.
(The VTR, consist of the photos).
The inspection has been conducted on 10.03.2012 in the same place
where the first VT SRC visit, State Govt. visit were carried out. So, there is no
shifting yet.
Due to my physical inconvenience, I couldn’t reply immediately. Hence, I
request the SRC to grant a max. of 6 months duration to complete the
construction work.
After 6 months, we will be ready for fresh inspection with all the proper
documents mentioned thereof”.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered by SRC
in its 230th meeting held on 16th -17th July, 2012 and the reply is unconvincing
and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:


The Institution was granted recognition in temporary premises to run
D.T.Ed course on 06.11.2007 with a condition that it should shift to its
own permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 06-11-2010. The
Institution is still running in temporary premises and not shifted to new
premises even after a lapse of stipulated 3 years and after lapse of time
period of more than 4 years and 09 months.
The request of the institution for 6 months more time to finish the
construction of the building work cannot be acceded as per NCTE
Regulations 2009. As per NCTE Regulations 8 (10):
“ At the time of inspection, the building of the institution shall be complete in the
form of a permanent structure on the land possessed by the institution in terms
of sub-regulation (7) of Regulation 8, equipped with all necessary amenities and
fulfilling all such requirements as prescribed in the norms and standards. The
applicant institution shall produce the original completion certificate issued by the
competent Government Authority or local body authority, approved building plan
in proof of the completion of building and built up area and other documents to
the visiting team for verification. No temporary structure or asbestos roofing shall
123
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
be allowed in the institution, even if it is in addition to the prescribed built up
area”.




















The Institution was granted recognition in temporary premises to run
B.Ed course on 06.11.2007 with a condition that it should shift to its own
permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 06.11.2010. The
Institution is still running in temporary premises and has not shifted to
new premises even after a lapse of more than 4 years and 05 months.
As per VTR, the management has not shifted to own building and on a
whole was very indifferent in submitting records related to land, building
and other documents.
As per VTR, the management was not interested in inspection conducted
by NCTE.
The institution has not submitted the inspection fee of Rs. 40000/-.
As per VT report, total built up area is only 4760.80 sq.ft, which is
inadequate for the course being run and as per NCTE norms, 16000
sq.ft. of built up area is required.
Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized
engineer is not submitted.
Sy.No. mentioned in land documents are not tallying with building plan
submitted.
Non-encumbrance certificate from sub-registrar is not submitted.
Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of
educational institution only is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue
Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to
educational purposes.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in joint names were not submitted.
The Affidavit on Rs. 100/- stamp paper in the prescribed format with
notary attestation is to be submitted.
Address of the land as per Questionnaire is not duly filled up.
As per VTR, the size of the multipurpose hall is only 1212 sq.ft, which is
less than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft. as per NCTE norms.
As per VTR, the institution has not subscribed for journals to the library,
as per NCTE norms.
As per VT report, the building has two floors, the ground floor is
partitioned temporarily with cement bricks for class rooms, hall, labs,
library, principal and faculty rooms are inadequate in area as per NCTE.
The first floor is roofed with asbestos sheets, which is not permissible as
per NCTE norms.
As per VTR, language learning lab is not available.
As per VTR, furniture provided in the labs, Principal rooms, staff room etc
are inadequate and needs to be strengthened. No labeling of the college
on any of the furniture and other items.
As per VTR, equipments in the Psychology lab is sealed in covers,
appears to be old and are not been used and some of the equipments
are already damaged. No seating arrangements are made in the lab for
conducting tests.
As per VTR, Education Technology lab needs to be strengthened.
As per VTR, materials available in the other lab and Physical education
lab etc. is old and damaged. Needs to be strengthened.
124
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013




As per VTR, Details of bills and entry register towards purchase of
equipments to each laboratory is not submitted. Details of equipments in
each laboratory is not submitted.
As per VTR, the management has not created any website so far.
As per VTR, Details of bills and entry register therein towards books in
library title wise is not submitted.
The seating capacity in the library is for 20 students only, which is
inadequate as per NCTE norms.
Based on the above points the committee decides and with reference to the
totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind, to
withdraw the recognition of the D.T.Ed course run by the “Kavingnar Kolanji
Teacher Training Institute, T.Pzjur Road, Jayankondam Taluk, Perambalur621802, Tamilnadu, from the academic year 2012-13, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.
Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution on 26.09.2012.
The institution preferred appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority vide
order no. F.No.89-795/2012 Appeal/4th Meeting-2013 dtd. 01.04.2013 has stated
as follows:“ after perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council
concluded that the SRC was justified in withdrawing recognition and therefore
the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council hereby confirms the Order appealed
against”.
58
SRCAPP1013
B.P.Ed
Sri Sai Aditya
Institute of
Diploma
Education, East
Godavari
District
AP
The committee has noted the matter.
Sri Sai Aditya Institute of Diploma Education, Plot No. 2-6-17, Sreenagar
Colony, Kakinada Urban, East Godavari District-533003, Andhra Pradesh
Sarojini Educational Society, Plot No. 2-24-4, Ground floor, Temple Tree
Apartments, Near Janma Boomi Park, Srinagar Village, Engineering
College Post Office, Kakinada Urban and Town, East Godavari District,
Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to Sri Sai Aditya Institute
of Diploma Education, Plot No. 2-6-17, Sreenagar Colony, Kakinada Urban,
East Godavari District-533003, Andhra Pradesh for B.P.Ed course online on
29.09.2011 for one years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993
and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 30.09.2011.
NCTE-Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009, it amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads as
follows:2 (B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely. 1 (1-A) (I)
the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
a. The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council for
125
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of
submission of online application.
b. Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within 7
days of the submission of the online application.
c. Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority
indicating that the society. Institution applying for the course possessed
land on the date of application is not dispatched within 7 days of the
submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in 213th meeting held on 6th-7th November, 2011
and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid
on the table. The Regional committee decided to reject the application on the
following grounds.

Valid printout of on-line application not submitted.
Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution vide no. F.No.
SRCAPP1013(2012-13)/B.P.Ed/AP/2011-12/36192 dated 23/01/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-57/2012
Appeal/3rd Meeting-2012 A 50899 dated 18/04/2012 state that “the council
concluded that there was adequate Justification in remanding the case to the
SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per regulations”.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09th – 10th May 2012 has considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 18/04/2012 and decided to process the application
on submission of original application and related supporting documents as per
the regulations.
The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 25.06.2012/ . (Reminder). A deficiency
letter was issued to the institution on 11.07.2012.
The institution has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on
17.09.2012
 The institution not submitted the reply with in stipulated time of 60 days
and with delay of 7 days.
The committee in its 233rd meeting held on 26-28th September, 2012 considered
the reply of the institution, which is received on 17/09/2012, i.e., after 07 (Seven)
days from the date of issue of deficiency letter dt 11/07/2012 and with reference
to the totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind,
the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse
and reject the application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
As per the decision of SRC, rejection order was issued to the institution on
126
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
30.10.2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution filed an appeal to NCTEHqrs and the appellate authority in its order dt. 06.03.2013 stated that “….the
council concluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to the SRC to
consider the reply of the institution and take further action as per the
regulations”.
In pursuance to appellate authority order reply to the deficiency letter dt.
29.12.20111 is scrutinized.
The Committee considered the appellate authority order dt. 06.03.2013,
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 29.12.2011 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice
under section 14 of NCTE Act, for the following:

The FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs already expired on 21.09.2012, the institution
has not submitted original FDRs.
 Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards T.P.T & H.P.T
courses which are already run by the institution from the affiliating
body/State Govt/examining body is not submitted.
In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee
decided to issue a Show cause Notice to the institution as to why the
recognition be not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the
institution to make a written representation within 21 days from the date of
receipt of the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order
to take a final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken
including the refusal & rejection of application for recognition, based on
the records available, with no further notice.
59
SRCPP1350
D.El.Ed
Thotakur
Ramakotaiah
College of
Elementary
Education,
Guntur District
AP
Thotakuru Ramakotaiah College of Elementary Education, No. 8-6 & 8-6/1,
NS-5, beside street, Ganapavaram Village & post, Nadendla Mandal Taluk,
Guntur District-522619, Andhra Pradesh
Thinkers Educational Society, No. 8-6 & 8-6/1, NS-5, beside street,,
Ganapavaram Village & post, Nadendla Mandal Taluk, Guntur District522619, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Thotakuru
Ramakotaiah College of Elementary Education, No. 8-6 & 8-6/1, NS-5,
beside street, Ganapavaram Village & post, Nadendla Mandal Taluk, Guntur
District-522619, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course of two years duration
under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee,
NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the
office of SRC on 05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011/03.01.2012 (Reminder). A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has
replied to the deficiency letter on 29.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th Meeting held on 30th-31st March, 2012 considered the reply
127
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
of the institution dt. 29.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for
the following:








Certified copy of land documents issued by Sub-Registrar is not
submitted. Original notarized translated copy of land documents in
English version is not submitted.
In the approved building plan submitted, total earmarked area for
the existing and proposed course is not mentioned. Built up area in
the building plan is corrected and overwritten.
In building completion certificate submitted, type of roofing is not
mentioned.
In the Affidavit submitted, Sy.No is not mentioned.
Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for
conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
Extent of land converted for educational purposes is not given.
Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by Sub-registrar is not
submitted.
Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions towards other B.Ed
(APS07453) course, which is already run by the Society from the
affiliating body/State Govt/examining body is not submitted.
Total earmarked built up area for the existing course and proposed
course is not submitted.
Reply to the deficiency letter is incomplete and not satisfactory.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 27/04/2012.
The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice even after
the expiry of stipulated time of 21 days from the date of issue of the notice.
Keeping in view, Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as
under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the
conditions specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The
Council is directed to ensure that in future no institution is granted
recognition unless it fulfils the conditions laid down in the Act and
the Regulations and the time schedule fixed for processing the
application by the Regional Committee and communication of the
decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered to”.
The SRC in its 226th Meeting held on 09th-10th July, 2012 considered the matter,
as the institution has not submitted reply even after stipulated period of 21 days
from the date of issue of show cause notice letter dt. 27.04.2012 and with
reference to the totality of information collected & based on a collective
application of mind, the committee decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE
Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 10/08/2012.
128
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No. 89647/2012Appeal/13 th Meeting-2012 dated 07/01/2013 stated that “…the
council concluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to the SRC for
consideration of the reply to be re-submitted by the appellant. The
appellant is directed to send the reply to the SRC immediately for
necessary action”.
The SRC in its 240th meeting held on 09th-11th March 2013, considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 07/01/2013, as per the direction of the
Appellate authority to the Appellatent, the committee decided to wait for
month to receive the reply from the institution for necessary action and
processing. Failing to send the reply by the institution, propose closure.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 08.02.2013 and
05.04.2013.
The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.08.02.2013 &
05.04.2013 and all other relevant documents and decided to cause
inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the
institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly
rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
60
SRCAPP908
D.El.Ed
Geethanjali
D.Ed College,
Guntur District
AP
Geethanjali D.Ed College, No. 285/2B2A, Vinukonda Village, Post & Taluk,
Guntur District-522647, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Giri Educational Society, No. 23-1306/1, Palnadu Road, Vinukonda
Village, Post & Taluk, Guntur Distirct-522647, Andhra Pradesh had applied
for grant of recognition to Geethanjali D.Ed College, No. 285/2B2A,
Vinukonda Village, Post & Taluk, Guntur District-522647, Andhra Pradesh
for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act,
1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 28/09/2011 and
physical application has been received in the office of SRC on 30/09/2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 14/10/2011 followed by reminder on
03/01/2012. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 27/12/2011. The
institution has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on
24/02/2012.
The SRC in its 219th meeting held on 15th – 16th March, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 24.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice for the following:


The institution has submitted Rent deed dt. 21/09/2011, As per NCTE
regulations 2009, rent deed is not permissible. As per Regulations of
NCTE the land should be in the form of sale deed/gift deed/Govt. lease
deed duly certified by Sub-registrar. Land on lease from private parties
& on rent is not permissible.
Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent Govt.
authority is not submitted. In the building plan submitted, Sy.Nos are
129
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013


corrected by hand. Which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.
Building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized
engineer in a proper format is not submitted.
Notarised land usage certificate from Revenue Divisional Office of the
Govt, is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not
submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to educational
purposes.
Accordingly Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 04.04.2012. The
institution submits its written representation on 23.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd Meeting held on 9th-10th May, 2012 considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 23.04.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under section
14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:





Notarised gift deed dt.21.09.2011 submitted copies of land document is
not certified by Sub-Registrar.
Proceedings of the Revenue Department for conversion of land from
agriculture to non –agriculture/Educational purpose is to be submitted
The building plan in the favour of the Society not in the favour of the
college
BCC is corrected with white fluid, fresh BCC has to be submitted.
At the time of the application the institution has submitted regisrted
rental deed vide dated 21.09.2011 for Sy.No.285/2B2A. Whereas, now
the institution has submitted copy of gift deed vide registered dated
21.09.2011 for the same Sy.No. 285/2B2A institute as to clarify the
same.
Before issuance of Show Cause Notice, the institution has submitted its reply on
22.06.2012 as per website.
The reply of the institution vide letter dt,. 22.06.2012 to the show cause
notice was duly considered by the SRC in its 226th Meeting held on 29th –
10th July, 2012 and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory,
deficiencies still persist as under:

As per building competion certificate, the total built up area is 17246
sq.fts, out of which 10410 sq.ft. is with RCC roofing and remaining 6835
sq.ft is covered with asbestos roofing, which is not permissible as per
NCTE norms.
8 (10) of Regulations 2009 says:
At the time of inspection, the building of the institution shall be complete in
the form of a permanent structure on the land possessed by the institution
in terms of sub-regulation (7) of Regulation 8, equipped with all necessary
amenities and fulfilling all such requirements as prescribed in the norms
and standards. The applicant institution shall produce the original
ompletion certificate issued by the competent Government Authority or
local body authority, approved building plan in proof of the completion of
building and built up area and other documents to the visiting team for
130
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
verification. No temporary structure or asbestos roofing shall be allowed in
the institution, even if it is in addition to the prescribed built up area.

As per Encumbrance certificate dt. 21/02/2012 land is on lease basis
whereas gift deed/settlement deed submitted on 22/06/2012 is on
ownership basis, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee
decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application
of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
As per the decision of SRC, rejection order was issued to the institution on
21.08.2012.
The institution had filed appeal Under Section 18 of NCTE Act, before the
Appellate Authority, NCTE, New Delhi against the rejection order of SRC.
The appellate authority in its order dated 12.03.2013 stated that “…the council
therefore, concluded that the matter deserved to be remanded to SRC for further
processing as per the Regulations”.
In pursuance to the appellate authority order the application processed.
The Committee considered the Appellate authority order dt. 12/03/2013
and all other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under
section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to
the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, as per the norms.
Volume-03
Consideration of LOI Cases
61
SRCAPP1238
D.El.Ed
Sai Baba District
Institute of
Education and
Training,
Kadapa District
AP
Sai Baba District Institute of Education and Training, Plot/Khasara
No.43/1, Akkayapalli Street, Kadapa Village and Taluk, R.V. Nagar
Post, Kadapa City and District - 516003, Andhra Pradesh.
Sai Baba Educational Society, Plot No.56/223 Akkayapalli Road
Kadapa Village and Post, Kadapa City and Taluk, Kadapa District 516003, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sai
Baba District Institute of Education and Training, Plot/Khasara
No.43/1, Akkayapalli Street, Kadapa Village and Taluk, R.V.Nagar
Post, Kadapa City and District - 516003, Andhra Pradesh for D.El. Ed
course of two years duration under Section 14(l) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09 2011 and physical
application has been received in the office of SRC on 03.10.2011.
NCTE - Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009 and amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads
131
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
as follows:2(B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely." 1(1-A)
(I) the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:



The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date
of submission of online application.
Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within
7 days of the submission of the online application.
Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the
Course possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in its 224th Meeting held on 161h - 17Ih June,
2012 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid on
the table the Regional committee decided to reject the application on the following
grounds:
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory as per
Regulations 2009.
Accordingly the application of Sai Baba District Institute of Education
and Training, Plot/Khasara No.43/1, Akkayapalli Street, Kadapa
Village and Taluk, R.V.Nagar Post, Kadapa City and District 516003, Andhra Pradesh for permission to D.E.C.Ed course was rejected on
13.01.2012.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 09.07.2012.
The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate
Authority vide order no. F.No. 89-385/2012 Appeal/8 th Meeting- 2012 has
stated as follows:
“after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit
and after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the
Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case
to the SRC for processing the application for D.E.C.Ed Course as per
Regulations.
Now therefore, the Council hereby remands back the case of Sai Baba
District Institute of Education and Training, Kadapa, Andhra
Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for necessary action as indicated above”.
In pursuance to the Appellate Authority order dated 17.09.2012, the
application is being processed
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all
relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993,
Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the
table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of
132
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of
50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2013-14 subject to the
appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as
per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given
effect before the commencement of the academic session.
As per direction of Southern Regional Committee in its SRC in its 233 rd Meeting
held on 26th-28th September, 2012 letter of intent prior to recognition was issued
to applicant institution on 04/10/2012. In response to this office letter the
institution has submitted reply vide letter dated 26/10/2012.
the institution has filed W.P. No. 32814 of 2012 received on 18.10.2012 in the
Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad. The Hon’ble Court has
ordered that “… Respondent No. 1 is directed to permit the petitioner to
commence the course from 2012-13 by appropriately modifying its order
de. 04.10.2012 and include the petitioner college in the list of colleges for
counseling for the year 2012-13.
The SRC considered the matter along with other similar matters and directed to
obtain the stay and file an appeal against the aforesaid court order.
Thereafter, the NCTE has filed W.A NO. 1457 of 2012 dt. 30.11.2012 in the
Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh. The Hon’ble court order has ”…direct
that the 1st respondent /writ petitioner shall file the appeal before the
appellate authority, in accordance with the provisions ofla, within a period
of ne week from date, and consequently it is desirable that the same
should be disposed of by the appellate authority within a period of two
weeks thereafter, and duly communicate the order to the 1st
respondent/writ petitioners”.
The above court oder have been forwarded to NCTE hqrs on 5.12.2012 for
appropriate action as per court directions.
The SRC in its 236th Meeting held on 16th-18th December, 2012 considered the
matter and decided to Await Appellate authority order.
The appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-385/2012 Appeal/8th Meeting2012 dated 08/01/2013 stated that “…The council also noted that the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India in their order dated 31/01/2011 in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 inter alia held that the time schedule fixed for processing of the
applications and communication of the decision on the issue of recognition
should be strictly adhered to the council further noted that the Govt. of Andhra
Pradesh has written to the SRC, NCTE on 08/08/2012 requesting them not to
issue any letter of intent / recognition in respect of new private D.Ed colleges to
start D.Ed course during 2012-13 in Andhra Pradesh State as (i) it is mandatory
for D>Ed Colleges to have 200 working days, exclusive of the period of
examination and admission; (ii) as only one month is left before the
commencement of the academic session 2012-13 and if any new letters of
intent are issued the institutions will fail to fulfill the NCTE norm of 200 working
days and (iii) it will also disturb the academic year 2012-13 in Andhra Pradesh in
view of the foregoing the council concluded that the SRC was justified in issuing
letter of intent for the academic year 2013-14 and therefore the appeal deserved
to be rejected and the order of the SRC confirmed.
After perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
133
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the council concluded
that the SRC was justified in issuing letter of intent for the academic year 201314 and therefore the appeal deserved to be rejected and the order of the SRC
confirmed ”.
Note:- Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on 04/10/2012 and the reply
for Letter of Intent received on 26/10/2012, which was placed before SRC in its
238th Meeting held on 16th-18th December, 2012 and the committee considered
the matter and decided to await for appellate authority order.
The Committee has noted the Appellate Authority order dt. 08/01/2013 by
confirming the SRC’s order dt. 04/10/2012.
Further,
The Committee considered the matter and decided to
issue formal recognition from 2014-15 to the institution for
D.El.Ed course in view of the Supreme Court order dt.
13.12.2012. The Hon’ble Supreme Court order reads as
under:
“The recognition and affiliation granted as per above schedule shall
be applicable for the current academic year. For example
recognition granted up to 3rd March, 2013 and affiliation granted up
to 10th May, 2013 shall be effective for the academic year 2013-2014
i.e. the courses starting from 1st April, 2013. For the academic year
2013-2014, no recognition shall be issued after 3rd March, 2013 and
no affiliation shall be granted after 10th May, 2013. Any affiliation or
recognition granted after the above cut-off dates shall only be valid
for the academic year 2014-2015”.
62
SRCAPP1759
D.El.Ed
Mother College
of Education,
Vishakapatnam
District
AP
Mother College of Education, Ward No. 4, Jodugullu, Sabbavaram Village
and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh.
Mother Educational Trust has applied for grant of recognition to Mother
College of Education, Ward No. 4, Jodugullu, Sabbavaram Village and
Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh had submitted
anapplication for Mother College of Education, Ward No. 4, Jodugullu,
Sabbavaram Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh
for D.El.Ed course for two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act,
1993 and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 7.10.2011.
NCTE-Hqrs. had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009, and amendment notified on 26th November, 2010 which
reads as follows:
2(B) for Sub Regulation, (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely “1(a-A) (I)
the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:

The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council for
134
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of
submission of online application.
 Hard copy in triplicate of the on-line application is not dispatched within 7
days of the submission of the on-line application.
 Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority
indicating that the society. Institution applying for the course possessed land
on the date of application is not dispatched within 7 days of the submission of
online application.

The SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 6th and 7th
November, 2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and
other related documents, NCTE apt 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time
to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to reject the
application on the following grounds:Not submitted the hard copy of on-line application as required under NCTE
Regulation, 2009.
Accordingly, the application of Mother College of Education, Ward No. 4
Jodugullu, Sebbavaram Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra
Pradesh for permission to D.El.Ed course was rejected on 23.1.2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-121/2012 dated
11.05.2012 state that “the council concluded that there was adequate
justification in remanding the case to the SRC for further processing of the
application on merit as per regulations”.
The SRC in its 222nd Meeting held on 9th to 10th May considered the matter and
decided to process the application on the direction of appellate order dated
18.04.2012.
In obedience to the appellate authority order dated 18.04.2012, the institution
has submitted the reply.
The SRC in its 226th meeting held on 09th –10th June 2012 considered the
matter, original documents of the institution as per the appellate authority order
and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final
Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:





In the approved building plan copy submitted, name of the proposed course is
not given.
Building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is not
submitted. In the BCC submitted.
Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that
the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is
not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for
conversion of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
In the affidavit submitted, total land area is not given.
Copy of the trust deed is not submitted.
By seeing the website the institution has submitted the reply dated 26.07.2012.
The SRC in its 229th meeting held on 30th-31st July, 2012 considered the reply of
135
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
the institution dt.26-07-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to
cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the
institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly
rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 10th-14th & 16th August, 2012.
The same was intimated to the institution on 07.08.2012. The inspection of the
institution was conducted on 13.08.2012
The SRC in its 231st meeting held on 22nd-23rd August 2012, considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 03.09.2012 (with
reference to online minutes)
The Committee in its 233rd meeting held on 26-28th September 2012, considered
the show cause notice reply of the institution and all other relevant documents
and decided to cause Inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
Note: Same VT to inspect the two institutions in the same visit (to foreclose
scope for use of the same premises for both the case)
As per the direction of SRC, the inspection of the institution was conducted on
12.06.2012 and the VT report received in the office of SRC on 19.06.2012.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all
relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993,
Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the
table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of
recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an annual intake of
50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year 2013-14 subject to the
appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as
per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given
effect before the commencement of the academic session.
Accordingly, a letter of intent was issued to the institution on 18/01/2013. The
institution has submitted written representation on 18/03/2013
The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt. 18.03.2013 and
all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve
Notice Under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act for the following:

The institution has not submitted marks sheets of staff.
 The institution has not submitted service certificate and Joining report of
Principal.
In view of the above and with reference to the totality of information
136
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
63
SRCAPP1488
D.El.Ed
National
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Kurnool District
AP
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Committee
decided to issue a Notice to the institution, as to why the recognition be
not refused and thereby providing an opportunity to the institution to
make a written representation within 21 days from the date of receipt of
the Notice along with necessary certificates/documents in order to take a
final decision in the matter; failing which action will be taken including the
refusal and rejection of application for recognition, based on the records
available, with no further notice
National Teacher Training Institute, Plot/Khasara No. 211A, Adoni Village,
Post, Adoni City and Taluk, Kurnool District-518302, Andhra Pradesh
National Educational Society, Plot No. 211/A, APHB Colony, Adoni Village,
Post, Adoni City and Taluk, Kurnool District-518302, Andhra Pradesh had
applied for grant of recognition to National Teacher Training Institute,
Plot/Khasara No. 211A, Adoni Village, Post, Adoni City and Taluk, Kurnool
District-518302, Andhra Pradesh for D.E.C.Ed Course of two years duration
under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 30.09.2011 and physical application has been
received in the office of SRC on 05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08.11.2011 followed by reminder on
22.12.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011 and
the institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 13.02.2012.
The SRC in its 218th meeting held on 28th February 2012 considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 13.02.2012 and the relevant documentary evidences
and it were decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE
Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 22.03.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 12.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09-10 May 2012, considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 12-04-2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice.
Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 14.06.2012. The
institution submitted its reply on 20.06.2012.
The reply of the institution vide letter dt,. 20.06.2012 to the show cause notice
was duly considered and the reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory,
deficiencies still persist as under:

As per the on-line application, the institution opted for D.E.C.Ed
course and now the institution is requested for change of course to
D.El.Ed, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations 2009.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the Southern Regional
137
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Committee in its 226th meeting held on 9th – 10th July, 2012 decided as per
NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.E.C.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution
F.No.SRCAPP1488 /D.EC.Ed/ AP/2012-2013/44859 dated 0/05/2012.
vide
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-403/2012
Appeal/8th Meeting-2012 dated 05.09.2012 states that ‘the council concluded
that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC for further
processing of the application for D.EI.Ed course on merit as per
regulations.’
The matter is placed before SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th
September 2012, decided to process.
In meanwhile, the institution has submitted relevant documents on 24.09.2012.
The status of other documents as per clause 7(1) of Regulation 2009 is given.
The SRC in its 234th meeting held on 16th-17th October 2012, considered the
reply of the institution dt.24-09-2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 24th -28th November 2012.
The same was intimated to institution on 20.11.2012. The inspection was
conducted on 02.11.2012. The VT report was received by SRC on 06.12.2012.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution,
all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993,
Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the
table, the Regional Committee in its 237th meeting held on 5-6th Jan, 2013
decided to issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two
year duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic
year 2013-14 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly
constituted selection committee as per the Norms
of NCTE/State
Government/Affiliating University and be given
effect before the
commencement of the academic session.
On Careful perusal of the original file of the institution and staff profiles
submitted by the institution in response to the letter of Intent, the Regional
Committee decided that Formal Recognition be granted to D.El.Ed.,
course of two year duration with an annual intake of 50 (Fifty only)
students from 2014-15.
64
SRCAPP1497
D.E.C.Ed
Santhiniketan
Santhiniketan Diploma in Elementary Education, No.36/5, 36/6, 36/7, 36/8,
Reddypalli Village, Padmanabham Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District531219, Andhra Pradesh.
138
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Diploma in
Elementary
Education,
Vishakhapatnam
District
AP
Anjani Educational Society, Dr.No.13-6A, Cheepurupalli Street, Bobbili,
Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to
Santhiniketan Diploma in Elementary Education, No.36/5, 36/6, 36/7, 36/8,
Reddypalli Village, Padmanabham Mandal, Vishakhapatnam District-531219,
Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course online on 30.09.2011 for two years duration
under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 and received in the SRC, NCTE on
05.10.2011.
NCTE – Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009, and amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads
as follows:2(B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely.”
1(1-A) (I) The application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of
the following circumstances:
a) The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council
for Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the
date of submission of online application.
b) Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is, not dispatched
within 7 days of the submission of the online application.
c) Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent
authority indicating that the society. Institution applying for the course
possessed land on the date of application is not dispatched within 7
days of the submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in 213th Meeting of SRC held on 06 th – 07th
November, 2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and
other related documents, NCTE Act 1993, Regulations and guidelines from time
to time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to reject the
application on the following grounds: Not submitted valid print out of online application and application
College of Diploma in Education is not available.
As per direction of SRC, rejection of application seeking recognition for
D.E.C.Ed course to the institution on 23.01.2012.
NCTE – Hqrs had directed to process the applications dated 18.04.2012. The
institution has submitted its written representation on 31.05.2012
The Committee in its 228th Meeting held on 24th – 25th July 2012,
considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 31.05.2012 and all the
relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause
Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:
1) The institution has applied for D.E.C.Ed course on-line and all the documents are
submitted for D.El.Ed course, which is not permissible as per NCTE Regulations. As
per NCTE guide lines, change of course other than the one applied on-line is not
139
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
permissible
2) Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the
agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is not
submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion
of land from agricultural to educational purposes.
3) Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a
Nationalized Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name if not given.
4) In the affidavit submitted, Sy.No. is not mentioned.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 21.08.2012
The institution has submitted its written representation on 24.08.2012.
The SRC in its 232nd meeting held on 29th – 31st August 2012 considered the
reply of the institution dt.24-08-2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection for the session 2013-14, under section 14 (1) of
NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per
the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the
deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting of SRC held on 26th – 28th September 2012,
considered the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act,
for the following:
1)
As per VT report, the size of the multipurpose hall is only 1237 sq.ft.
which is less than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft as per NCTE norms.
2) In the affidavit submitted, Sy.Nos. are not mentioned and Col.No.5 is
not duly filled up.
Before the issue of Show Cause Notice the institution referring to NCTE website
has submitted its reply
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the institution, all
relevant documents and other related documents, Act of NCTE, 1993,
Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to time laid on the
table, theSRC in its 235th meeting held on 21st – 22nd Nov, 2012decided to
issue Letter of Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year
duration with an annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit) for the academic year
2013-14 subject to the appointment of qualified staff through duly constituted
selection committee as per the Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating
University and be given effect before the commencement of the academic
session.
Accordingly, letter of intent was issued to the institution on 04/12/2012.
Meantime, the institution has submitted written representation on 31/01/2013 &
05/03/2013 for requesting to change of course name.
The institution has not submitted reply for letter of intent after the stipulated time
of two months frm the date of issue of the leter of intent (Late for 130 daays).
The institution has not submitted reply to letter of intent so far.
The committee considered the matter, as the institution has not submitted
reply for LOI even after stipulated period of 2 months from the date of
issue of LOI letter dt. 04/12/2012 and with reference to the totality of
140
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the
committee decided as per clause 7(9) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to
withdraw LOI issued to the institution and refuse and reject the
application of the institution for recognition of D.E.C.Ed course.
Volume-04
Consideration of Show Cause Notice Reply
65
AOS00463
B.Ed
Siddaganga
College of
Education,
Tumkur District
KA
Siddaganga College of Education, B.H. Road, Someshwarapuram post,
Tumkur Dt. - 572102, Karnataka.
Siddaganga College of Education, B.H. Road, Someshwarapuram post, Tumkur
District – 572102, Karnataka. The institution was granted recognition for offering
B.Ed course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 27.08.2003 with the
condition to shift to its own premises.
This office is in receipt of a letter NO. TY:VCPS:2011-12.98 dt. 21.05.2011 from the
Vice-Chancellor of Tumkur University, Tumkur by enclosing a list of 19 institutions
with the committee observations by conducting inspections.
The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9th -10th June 2011, noted the inspection
report of the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, dated. 21.05.2011 and the
deficiencies in the 19 institutions in Tumkur District and decided to issue Show
Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, Show Cause Notice
was issued to the institution on 08.07.2011. The institution submitted its written
representation on 08.08.2011 for the following deficiencies:-







No. Multipurpose hall
No independent science laboratory, ICT, Computer lab
No Audio-visual equipments
Educational Journals are not subscribed to the library as per NCTE norms
No reading room facility
S.R. not maintained
Consolidated salary for staff members
The Committee considered the request and postponed the inspection date from
18.11.2011 to 2nd week of December 2011. Accordingly, an inspection on the
institution carried on 24.01.2012.
The SRC in its 223rd meeting held on 29th –31st May,2012 decided to issue Final
Showcause Notice to the institution and Final Showcause Notice was issued to
the institution on 25.6.2012. The institution has submitted reply to the Final
Showcause Notice on 7.8.2012 for the following deficiencies:-
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is not
submitted.
Original Approved blue print of the building plan from competent civil
authority is not submitted.
Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized
engineer is not submitted.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a
Nationalised Bank in joint account in favour of Society/college/institution name if
not given.
Latest encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.
141
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
6.
The Principal is not qualified for the post of Principal as he is not possessing
Ph.D qualification.
7.
Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of
educational institution only is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional
Officer not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to educational
purposes.
8.
Multipurpose hall size is 1811 sq.ft. which is less than the requirement of
2000 sq.ft. as per NCTE norms.
9.
Approved staff list from the affiliating body for the academic year is not
submitted.
10.
Most of lecturers are not qualified as they are not having 55% marks in MA.
The SRC in its 234th meeting held on 17th – 18th October,2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 07.08.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
22.11.2012. The institution submitted its written representation on 11.01.2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
As per the land document submitted to this office(Copy-1) The
President of the Town Municipal Council dated 1.8.1944, the land
having Sy.No.31, Tumkur Kasaba Hobli is sanctioned for the
construction of a High School building in the name of Sri. Siddaganga
Mutt.The Copy of the Permission/ Licence for construction in favour of
the Mutt of Tumkur City Municipal Office dated 9.10.1983 for property
No.9377(copy -3) attested by the Notary is submitted. As per the copy
of the Tax receipt dated 5.12.2012(Copy-4), approved by the City
Municipal Corporation, the building is at 2805/365, BH Road, having
19896 sq.ft. Sy. Nos/Khata Nos/Site Nos are different at the documents
submitted in support of land and building.

From the Original Building plan and BCC dated 20.10.2009 submitted to
this office, it is not known whether the proposed III floor is constructed
or not . As per Building plan and BCC at No.2805/365, BH Road,
Tumkur, the site area is 2085.23 sq.mtrs. and built up area of 19896
sq.ft. is less for offering D.Ed./D.Ed.(AI)/B.Ed. and M.Ed. courses.

Reserve fund of Rs. 3 lakhs meant for B.Ed. course is not submitted.

Latest up-to-date Non-Encumbrance Certificate(Upto the year 2012) is
not submitted.

As per the land document submitted dated 1.8.1944, the land is allotted
for the construction of a High School Building and not meant for
offering teacher education programme.
As per para 7(ii) of NCTE
regulations, 2009, “The teacher education institution shall not be
allowed to have any other institution within its demarcated area or
142
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
building and shall not have any other course(s) in its building.”

The appointment of Sri. R. Rudraradhya as Principal is not approved by
the affiliating University.

The institution has not appointed Physical Education instructor,
Lecturer in Fine Arts as per NCTE regulations, 2009.

No documentary proof submitted for construction of Fourth floor as
submitted by the institution.
As per MIS records, the Mutt is offering the following courses at the same
address apart from B.Ed. course :
Recognition is granted to D.Ed. course(AOS00499) on 15.11.2001 with
an intake of 90 and D.Ed.(Addl. Intake) course(APS02451) on 27.12.2004
with an additional intake of 60 thus making the total intake of 150 for
D.Ed course at Sri Siddaganga Teacher Training Institute, B.H. Road,
Tumkur-572102, Karntaka.

M.Ed. course (APS08931) is granted recognition on 30.8.2008 with an
intake of 25 and enhanced to 35 on 24.8.2010 at Sri. Siddaganga
Education Society, B.H. Road, Tumkur-572102, Karnataka.
As per NCTE regulations, 2009, the institution must have 3500 sq.mtrs. of
land area and built up area for offering D.Ed. course, B.Ed. course and
M.Ed. course. Since, the institution is also having D.Ed. Additional intake,
the land area and built-up area of the Society/institution/Mutt is less and is
not as per NCTE norms and regulations, 2009.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by Siddaganga College of Education,
B.H. Road, Someshwarapuram post, Tumkur Dt. - 572102, Karnataka. from
the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of
students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
66
APS01791
D.Ed
St.Paul’s
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Bangalore
KA
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute, No. 1, 2nd Main Road, BDA Layout,
Pattegarapalya, Bangalore – 79, Karnataka.
St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute, No.1, 2nd Main Road, BDA Layout,
Pattegarapalya, Bangalore-79, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering
D.Ed. course on 29.11.2004 from the academic session 2004-05 with an annual
intake of 50 students with a condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years
from the date of grant of recognition.
On 29.3.2012, a Carbon copy of the letter addressed to the Secretary to Govt.,
Education Dept., Government of Karnataka is received from the Director,
143
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
DSERT, Bangalore stating that “a surprise inspection was conducted to the
institution on 3.3.2012. The Management has made admission of 24 students
under the management quota and no classes are being conducted. It was also
pointed out that the institution is offering D.Ed., B.Ed. and M.Ed. course in the
same building. Hence, a Notice is given to the Principal on 9.3.2012. There is no
reply from the principal so far. As per the list of candidates admitted under
management quota, all the students are from West Bengal. The Migration
certificate dates are not tallying. As per the calendar only 3 months are left for
examination and at this stage sanction of admissions is not permitted. Hence,
the institution is offering the course illegally. The report submitted by the
Principal, DIET is submitted for taking necessary action.”
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th and 20th April, 2012 considered the
complaint letter from DSERT Bangalore and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE
Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
18.05.2012. The reply to the Notice is received from the institution on
05.06.2012.
The SRC in its 228th meeting held on 24th – 25th July 2012 considered the reply
of the institution vide letter dt. 05.06.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice. Accordingly, a show
cause notice was issued to the institution on 16.08.2012. The institution
submitted its written representation on 04.09.2012.
The SRC in its 234th meeting held on 17th –18th October 2012, considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 06.09.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to serve Final Show cause Notice.
Accordingly, a Final Show Cause notice was issued on 22.11.2012. The
institution submitted a written representation on 14.12.2012 and 24.01.2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
As per BCC, the land is on lease basis in the individual name which is
not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009.

As per copy of building plan submitted, the site area is 1477.66 Sq.mts.
As per NCTE Regulations 2009,for offering D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed
programmes 3500 Sq.mts of land area is required.

The institution has not submitted blue print of the building plan
approved by the competent authority.

NAAC certificate towards M.Ed course is not submitted.

As seen from records, the institution is offering D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed
courses in leased premises. But, as per NCTE Regulations 2009, the
institution must have its own permanent land and building for offering
D.Ed, B.Ed and M.Ed courses.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
144
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
recognition of the D.Ed course run by St. Paul’s Teacher Training Institute,
No. 1, 2nd Main Road, BDA Layout, Pattegarapalya, Bangalore – 79,
Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing
batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
67
APS07342
M.Ed
S.J.E.S.
Teachers
Education
Institute,
Bangalore
KA
S.J.E.S Tachers Education Institution,S.J.E.S Campus,Old
Road,Virgo Road Nagar post,Bangalore-560049,Karnataka.
Madras
S.J.E.S Tachers Education Institution,S.J.E.S Campus,Old Madras Road,Virgo
Road Nagar post,Bangalore-560049,Karnataka was granted recognition for
M.Ed course with an intake of 25 students vide – order
F.SRO/NCTE/M.Ed/2008-09/4373 dt. 30/8/2008. The intake of institution was
enhanced from 25 to 35 for M.Ed course with effect from 2010-2011 vide order
no F.SRO/NCTE/2010-11/APSO7342/20544 dated 20.08.2010.
A report is received on 14.9.2012 from the chairman and on behalf of Members
of Bangalore University Task Force on M.Ed Colleges affiliated to Bangalore
University.
The reports states that “ the Task force visited 7 M.Ed Colleges affiliated to
Bangalore University & submitted its report to the Hon’ble Vice Chancellor on
22nd August, 2012 & further a special meeting of Academic Council of Bangalore
University was convened to discuss & approve the report of the Task force.
In the light of the above, the members of Task force thought of appraising SRC
on its findings for kind notice & necessary action”.
The SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on 26th – 28th September 2012 considered the
Report of Bangalore University, Task force of the 7 M.Ed colleges affiliated to
Bangalore University vide letter dt. 14/09/2012 and it was decided to serve Show
Cause Notice under NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued on 19.11.2012. Since there is no
reply from the institution after a lapse of more than two months. The matter is
placed before 238th meeting of SRC held on 5th –6th February 2013 which is
defered to 239th meeting held on 26th – 27th February 2013.The institution has
submitted its written representation on 15.02.2013, which is delayed for more
than 63 days
Note:
A Show Cause Notice was issued on 19.11.2012. Since there was no reply from
the institution after a lapse of more than two months. The matter was placed
before 238th meeting of SRC held on 5th –6th February 2013 which was deferred
to 239th meeting held on 26th – 27th February 2013 and again deferred to 240th
meeting of SRC.
In the meantime, the institution has submitted
15.02.2013 which is after lapse of 63 days.
written representation on
145
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
The college has not submitted documentary proof of exclusive
facilities provided for M.Ed course. As per NCTE regulations, 2009 “The
teacher education institution shall not be allowed to have any other
institution within its demarcated area or building and shall not have any
other course(s) in its building”.

No documentary proof has been submitted by the college in their reply
regarding the total number of students admitted to the M.Ed.
programme is 34; out of them 16 are from Karnataka and the other 18
are from Kerala.

Ever since the start of M.Ed. programme in the year 2008, according to
the Principal, the college has not submitted the list of teaching staff to
the University for approval. Hence, none of the M.Ed. staff are approved
by the University till date. This is a serious lapse. No documentary
proof is submitted by the institution in their reply.

The college has a common library for all the courses running in the
campus. Only 804 books are available for M.Ed. programme at the
library. All these books were purchased only at the time of starting the
M.Ed. programme i.e. on March 7, 2008. In addition to this, about ten
Journals were there. The utilization of library from the staff and
students is very less. As per the issue register, only 12 students have
barrowed books from the library. No documentary proof is submitted
by the institution in their reply.

Labs are not at all available either for the B.Ed. or for the M.Ed.
programme. No documentary proof is submitted by the institution in
their reply.

Dissertation guidance has been given by the faculty who are not
qualified for teaching the M.Ed. course. Upon verification, it was found
that B.Ed. faculty (Mr. M. C. Krishna Muni, Ms. Vidyavathi) and a guest
faculty, Mr. Abdul Naveed A. of this college have guided the research
work (dissertation) of M.Ed. students. This is a serious academic lapse.
No documentary proof is submitted by the institution in their reply.
The interaction of the Task Force with the M.Ed. students of SJES COLLEGE
OF EDUCATION on August 2, 2012 at the Education Department in the Jnana
Bharathi Campus revealed that



Students who were present for this meeting told the Task Force that
they have seen majority of their M.Ed. classmates only during the
examination time; most of the students join this college only to write
their examination.
Attendance of the students was not insisted by the staff.
College management has demanded extra fee for dissertation guidance
from some of the students
146
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

Students were forced to pay additional amount by the college
management for getting internal assessment marks and those who did
not pay were given with very less marks.
No documentary proof is submitted by the institution towards the above
points.
Based on the above points the
recognition of the M.Ed course
Institution,S.J.E.S Campus,Old
post,Bangalore-560049,Karnataka,
order to enable the ongoing batch
complete their course.
committee decides to withdraw the
run by S.J.E.S Tachers Education
Madras Road,Virgo Road Nagar
from the academic year 2013-14, in
of students in M.Ed, course, if any, to
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
68
APS08940
B.Ed
Sandaravadhan
am Teacher
Training
Institute,
Cuddalore
District
TN
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Sandaravadhanam Teacher Training Institute, Papakudi Main Road,
Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore District–608301, Tamilnadu and
Sandaravadhanam College of Education, Pazhachanallur & Post,
Kattumannakoil Taluk, Cuddalore District-608301, Tamilnadu
Sandaravadhanam Teacher Training Institute, Papakudi Main Road,
Kattumannarkoil Taluk, Cuddalore District–608301, Tamilnadu for D.T.Ed and
D.T.Ed-AI and Sandaravadhanam College of Education, Pazhachanallur & Post,
Kattumannakoil Taluk, Cuddalore District-608301, Tamilnadu for B.Ed Course
was granted recognition for offering D.T.Ed course on 28.09.2006, D.T.Ed-AI on
02.11.2007, B.Ed course on 17.12.2007.
NCTE, Hqrs vide its letter dated 14.06.2011 has forwarded a copy of the
inspection report dated 22.09.2010 conducted under Section 13 of NCTE Act.
The deficiencies observed from the inspection report were communicated to the
institution vide office letter no.13-8/2010/NCTE/SEC13/Insp/TN-15/A35903
dated 08.02.2011 & no.13-8/2010/NCTE/SEC13/Insp/TN-15/A35209 dated
21.04.2011, which was replied by the institution vide its letters dated 24.02.2011
& 20.05.2011.
Keeping all the facts in view NCTE, Hqrs had requested SRC, to look into the
matter to ascertain the adherence of relevant NCTE norms & standards by the
institution and to take appropriate action in the matter under intimation to NCTEHqrs.
The SRC in its 207th meeting held on 23rd June 2011 considered the VT Report
and all the relevant documentary evidences and decided to serve Show Cause
Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was
issued to institution on 27.07.2011. The institution had submitted its written
representation 29.08.2011.
The SRC in its 213th meeting held on 06th-07th November, 2011 considered the
reply of the institution and since the reply is not satisfactory and convincing,
147
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
decided to cause inspection for all the courses on payment of Rs. 40,000/- each,
as the building is variant and confusing. The building covered by CD appears to
be different from the picture printed in the Trust’s vision document. Building Plan
itself was only for 33,193 sq.ft. What is needed is 38,000 sq.ft. Staff list was in
complete. Installation of 30 computers to be checked. Staff list was in complete
for B.Ed and also salary payment details are not adequate; Bank details are
required. Installation of equipment to be checked. Accordingly, the inspection of
the institution was conducted on 19.01.2012. The institution submitted DD
bearing no. 931400 dt. 19.01.2012 for Rs. 40,000/- and another DD bearing no.
931401 dtd. 19.01.2012 for
Rs. 40,000/- towards inspection fee for B.Ed and
D.T.Ed course.
The SRC in its 218th meeting held on 28th February, 2012 considered the VT
report, VCD and the relevant documentary evidences and with reference to the
totality of information collected & based on a collective application of mind,
decided to serve Show Cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 27.03.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on 19.04.2012 and
14.06.2012.
The SRC in its 231st meeting held on 22nd-23rd August, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 19.04.2012 & 14.06.2012 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and decided to serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE
Act. Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the institution on
15.09.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on
04.10.2012 and 11.10.2012.
The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 21st -22nd November, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letters dt. 04.10.2012 & 11.10.2012, and all the
relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause
Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly, a Show cause notice was issued to the
institution on 01.01.2013. The institution had submitted its written representation
on 23.01.2013 for which agenda was prepared for 240th meeting. In meantime
the institution submitted another letter to Show Cause Notice on 08.03.2013.
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
The faculty members are inadequate as per NCTE norms for the
courses being run by the institution.

In the building completion certificate submitted, name of the institution
given is not matching with the running institution’s name.

Land usage certificate is not notarised. Land usage certificate is in the
name of other Sy.No. 118/8B is also not mentioned.

Extension of multipurpose hall size is not certified by the Competent
Government authority.
 FDR No. 385981 of Rs. 3 lacs for APS)8558-D.T.Ed course & FDR No.
0520191 of Rs. 3 lacs for APS)8940-B.Ed course is renewed for a duration
148
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
of one year only, hence both the FDRS is not renewed for 5 years.
 Staff list duly approved by the affiliating body for D.T.Ed, D.T.Ed-Al and
B.Ed course is not submitted.
 Uptodate encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted and English version is not notarised.
 No doucumentary Proof Is submitted towards appointment of Lecuter in
Physical Director and Fine Arts.
 1+6 staff is grossly inadequate for 2 units of D.T.Ed courses.
 The institution is paying consolidated salary to staff members, which is
not permissibe as per NCTE norms.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course (APS08940) run by Sandaravadhanam
Teacher Training Institute, Papakudi Main Road, Kattumannarkoil Taluk,
Cuddalore District–608301, Tamilnadu , from the academic year 2013-14, in
order to enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed course, if any, to
complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
69
APS07199
B.Ed
Akshaya
College of
Teacher
Education,
Tumkur District
KA
Akshaya College of Teacher Education, Plot No. 161, Baddihalli Village,
Oordigere Hobli, Tumkur District-572102, Karnataka
Akshaya College of Teacher Education, Plot No. 161, Baddihalli Village,
Oordigere Hobli, Tumkur District-572102,
Karnataka had submitted an
application for starting B.Ed course on 29.05.2006. The institution was granted
recognition on 04.12.2008 with an annual intake of 100 students.
This office was in receipt of letter No.TY:VCPS:2011-12:98 dated 21.05.2011
from the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, Tumkur by enclosing a list of 19
institutions with the committee observations by conducting inspections.
The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9-10th June, 2011 noted the inspection
report of the Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University, dt. 21.05.2011 and the
deficiencies in the 19 institutions in Tumkur District and decided to issue show
cause notice under section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, a show cause notice
was issued to the institution on 22.07.2011. The institution had replied vide letter
dt. 16.08.2011.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September, 2011 considered the
149
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
letter
dt.21.05.2011 from Vice-Chancellor, Tumkur University pointing out
deficiencies in the 19 Tumkur University colleges and also reply of the above
institution dt. 16.08.2011 and other documents submitted by the institution and
decided to cause composite inspection for all the courses at premises Under
Section 17 of NCTE Act, to verify whether the institution is maintaining
instructional and infrastructural facilities as per NCTE norms. The institution was
directed to submit the following within 30 days of the receipt of the notice, with
Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- inspection fee towards the all the courses being
run, in favour of “The Member Secretary, NCTE” payable at Bangalore.
Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was carried out on 29.10.2011.
In the meantime, Tumkur University vide their letter received on 17.10.2011 has
conducted re-visits to the institution on 18.8.2011 and
made certain
observations.
In the meantime, R.O.,NCTE, HQ vide letter dated 3rd November, 2011 had
forwarded a complaint dated 30.7.2011 made by Sri. V.N. Ramesh, No.45, 3rd
Cross, Ashok Nagar, B.H.Road, Tumkur against 5 institutions(including this) with
direction to seek the comments from the institution on the complaint. The
complainant brought to the notice of NCTE about the gross irregularities in the
functioning of Divya B.Ed. College and also other B.Ed. Colleges(including this)
in Tumkur. He alleged that inspite of good reputation of Tumkur University
affiliated teacher education colleges, a few black-sheep like Divya College of
Education, Nayala College of Education, Akshaya College of Education, Bharathi
College of Education and Indira College of Education are bringing a bad name to
other colleges in Tumkur. He had requested to initiate immediate action in the
better interest of the students career and lives.
Note:- The institution was also offering D.Ed. course from 6.11.2007 and
requested for closure of D.Ed. course vide their letter dated 15.9.2011 for closing
down of the D.Ed. College.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21-23 September, 2011 considered the
Institutions’ request for closure of D.Ed course and decided to permit the closure
by withdrawing the recognition for (APS07009) D.Ed course with effect from
2013-2014, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if
any, to complete their final year course. Accordingly, withdrawal order for D.Ed.
course was issued on dated 29.10.2011.
The SRC Considered the VT Report, VCD and all the relevant documentary
evidence and decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 17 of NCTE
act. For the following deficiencies.
1. The Institution was granrecognition in temporary premises to run B.Ed
course on 04.12.2008 with a condition that it should shift to its own
permanent premises in 3 years. i.e., on or before 04.12.2011. Three year
periods is already lapsed. The Institution is still running in temporary
premises and not shifted to new premises even after a lapse of stipulated 3
years and after lapse of time period of more than 3 years and 01 month.
2. The Institution was granted recognition in a temporary premises to run B.Ed
course on 04.12.2008 with a condition to shift to permanent premises within
3 years. The institution was functioning at the time of recognition in the
address “Akshaya College of Teacher Education, Plot No. 161, Baddihalli
150
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Village, Oordigere Hobli, Tumkur District-572102, Karnataka”.
3. But, as per VT report, dt. 29.10.2011, the inspection of the institution was
conducted at the address “Akshaya College of Teacher Education, Ashok
Nagar, 2nd cross, SIT Main Road, Tumkur-572102, Karnataka”, where the
institution was functioning. The management neither informed SRC nor taken
permission for shifting to new address where the inspection was done. This
is a clear indication of carelessness and negligence on the part of
management. This is against the NCTE regulations. The management has
to clarify for the above lapses.
4.
5.
Approved building plan by the competent civil authority is not submitted. The
institution is required to submit fresh blue print and it should be clearly
mentioning the Khasara no, plot no, proposed course, land total area, built up
area duly approved by competent authority with resolution in all respects. If
the institution is running other teacher education courses / other technical
courses in the same premises, the institution is required to mention earmarked
area for each course.
As per VT report, the total built up area is only 7400 sq.ft, which is not
adequate as per NCTE norms.
6. Building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer is
not submitted.
7. Original Land usage certificate from competent Govt. authority is to be
submitted.
8. Non-encumbrance certificate from a competent Govt. authority is not
submitted.
9. Byelaws of the Society are not submitted by the management.
10. The Principal is not qualified as per NCTE norms. Experience certificate and
percentage of marks are not mentioned.
11. The post of lecturer in foundation courses (one post) is vacant, not filled up.
12. One post of Methodology courses is vacant, not filled up.
13. Part time post of Lecturer in Art Education (one post) and Director of Physical
Education (one post) is not filled up.
14. The staff list is not approved by the affiliating body.
15. The management is paying salary to the staff by cash instead of through
Bank Cheque.
The institution submitted reply vide letter dated 06.07.2012 received by this
office on 11.7.2012
The Southern Regional Committee in its 230th Meeting held on 16th – 17th July
2012, considered the reply of the institution vide letter dated 11.07.2012 and all
the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show
Cause Notice under NCTE Act and Final Show Cause Notice was issued on
31/08/2012.
1. As per records available in the file, the institution vide its initial application
dated 29.5.2006 had applied for B.Ed. course at Baddihalli village(p-68-69/c).
As per VT report (p-105/c), the inspection was also conducted at Baddihalli
village. Thereafter, after consideration of VT, the application was refused
and order was issued at Trust address(p-107/c). Further, on reversal of SRC
order by appellate authority vide order dated 10.11.2008(p-109/c),
Recognition was granted to the institution vide order dated 04.12.2008(p365/c) at Baddihalli village where the inspection was conducted.
2. On having received the recommendations of Tumkur University, the SRC
151
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
had proposed the inspection of the institution at Baddihalli village(p-419423/c).
However, as per VTR, the institution was conducted at Trust
address instead of location where the initial recognition was granted by SRC.
3. From the above, it appears that the institute has been working at different
location where the recognition was granted without approval of SRC.
4.
Now, in response to Final Show Cause Notice dated 6.6.2012, the institution is
proposing to shift the institution at another location. Moreover, there was no
condition mentioned in the recognition order dated 4.12.2008 (as per the
regulations prevailed at that time) for shifting of the building nor any
documents were produced regarding the land purchased at Lingapura village
at the time of grant of recognition to the institution
5. Building Completion certificate for Lingapura Tumkur having built up area
21,548.8 sq.ft. is submitted and is not approved by the competent authority.
6. Built up area is 2617.sq.mtrs. at the proposed B.Ed. college at Lingapura
Grama, Kora Hobli, Tumkur approved by the Panchayat Development
Officer, Obalapura Grama Panchayat, Tumkur Tq. Is submitted. Site area is
mentioned as 8781.68 sq.mtrs.
7. But, the land at Lingapura Grama, Kora Hobli was not mentioned at the time
of making application.
8. The Principal appointed is not qualified as per NCTE norms.
9. Copy of the appointment order/s is produced. Joining report is not
produced. Consolidated salary is paid.
10. Principal is identified to teach methodology course.
11. Art teacher &Director of Physical Education is identified. Joining report is not
submitted.
12. Approved staff list is not submitted.
The institution submitted reply vide letter dated 06/07/32012, 24/09/2012 and
05/10/2012
.As per records available in the file, the institution vide its initial application dated
29.5.2006 had applied for B.Ed. course at Baddihalli village(p-68-69/c). As per
VT report (p-105/c), the inspection was also conducted at Baddihalli village.
Thereafter, after consideration of VT, the application was refused and order was
issued at Trust address(p-107/c). Further, on reversal of SRC order by appellate
authority vide order dated 10.11.2008(p-109/c), Recognition was granted to the
institution vide order dated 04.12.2008(p-365/c) at Baddihalli village where the
inspection was conducted.
On 05/10/2012, the institution submitted a proposal to shift the institution to
Lingapura Village from II Cross , Ashoknagar. A certificate issued by the
Obalapura Gram Panchayath President and Secretary dated 15/10/2012 stating
that Akshaya Education Trust has taken prior permission for construction of 1st
Floor, II Floor and III Floor having 7182.9 sq.ft each at Tumkur Taluk, Kora Hobli,
Obalalpura Grama Panchayath is completed. The Sy. No., location of the
building and the course offered by the Trust is not mentioned in the certificate.
The SRC in its 236th meeting Held on 16th -17th December, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letters dated. 05/10/2012 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and i decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under
NCTE Act, Accordingly, a Final Showcase Notice was issued to the institution on
05/02/2013 for the following deficiencies.
152
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
1.
A photocopy of the building plan is submitted for Lingapura Village.
Approved blue print of the building from competent authority is not
submitted.
2. Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer
in prescribed format is not submitted.
3. Approved staff list from Tumkur University is not submitted.
Accordingly, a Final Showcase Notice was issued to the institution on
05/02/2013.The Institution submitted its reply vide letter dated 25.02.2013.
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
Photocopy of building plan submitted is for Lingapura Village and not
for Baddihalli Village.

Building completion Certificate approved by Assistant Executive
Engineer is submitted, but total built up area is not mentioned in
Building Completion Certificate.

The institution approval of Tumkur University is not submitted.
The institution was also offering D.Ed. course from 6.11.2007 and
requested for closure of D.Ed. course vide their letter dated 15.9.2011 for
closing down of the D.Ed. College
As per records available in the file, the institution vide its initial application
dated 29/05/2006 had applied for B.Ed course at Baddihalli Village (p-6869/c. As per VT report (p-105/c), the inspection was also conducted at
baddihalli Village. Thereafter. After consideration of VT. The application
was refused and order was issued at trust address(P-107/c). Further, on
reversal of SRC order by appellate authority vide order dated 10/11/2008(p109/c), Recognition was granted to the institution vide order dated
04/12/2008(p-365/c) at Baddihalli Village where the inspection was
conducted.
The Contention of the institution stating that the address was wrongly
mentioned is incorrect as the institution was inspected at the Baddihalli
address and the report of the same is attested by the Managing Trustee of
Akshaya Education trust.
Now, on 05/02/2013, the institution has submitted a proposal to shift the
institution to Lingapura Village from II cross, Ashoknagar. A certificate
issued by the Obalapura Gram Panchayat President and Secretary dated
15/10/2012 stating that Akshaya Education Trust has taken prior
permission for construction of 1st Floor, II Floor and III Floor having 7182.9
sq.ft each at Tumkur Taluk, Kora Hobli, Obalapura Grama Panchayat is
completed. The Sy.No., location of the building and the course offered by
the Trust is not mentioned in the certificate.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
153
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
recognition of the B.Ed course run by Akshaya College of Teacher
Education, Plot No. 161, Baddihalli Village, Oordigere Hobli, Tumkur
District-572102, Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to
enable the ongoing batch of students in B.Ed course, if any, to complete
their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
70
APS02091
B.Ed
Vivekananda
College of
Education,
Bangalore
KA
Vivekananda College of Education, Dr. Raj Kumar Road, 2nd Stage,
Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560055, Karnataka.
Janatha Education Society’s Vivekananda College of Education, Dr. Raj Kumar
Road, 2nd Stage, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560055, Karnataka was granted
recognition for B.Ed. course vide this office Order No.F.SRO/NCTE/B.Ed./20042005/8671 dated 25.11.2004 with a condition to shift to its own premises within 3
years.
The institution vide letter dated 8.12.2011 had requested for renewal of Fixed
Deposit Receipts which expired on 17.6.2011.
On going through the file, it was seen that the institution was granted recognition
in leased premises. From the Visiting team report dated 9.10.2004, it was
observed that the management was offering MBA, P.G. Courses, Pharmacy
College, Law College, Degree Colleges, Schools etc. The institution is also
sharing the Labs. with some other College. As per MIS, the institution is not
running any other course recognized with NCTE.
In order to ascertain the maintenance of extant, NCTE regulations, norms and
standards of 2009 by the institution, a proposal was placed before SRC to get the
institution inspected under Section 17 of NCTE Act.
The SRC in its 216th meeting of SRC held on 11th -12th January, 2012 considered
the VT and VCD of the institution and all the relevant documentary evidences
and decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Notice was issued to the institution on14.3.2012 for the following
deficiencies:1. The institution was given recognition on 25.11.2004 in a temporary leased
premises with a specific condition that the institution should move to a
permanent premise within a period of three years i.e., on or before
25.11.2007. Even after a lapse of time period of 7 years & 02 months, the
management has yet to start the construction of its own building/move to its
own building.
2.
As per VT report, the institution is functioning in a multistoried building; the
third floor is earmarked for B.Ed programme. The management is also
offering MBA, P.G. courses, Pharmacy College, Law College, Degree
College & Higher schools in the same building. The labs are being shared
154
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
with other colleges. This is against and gross violation of the NCTE norms.
The institution vide its letter dated 30.3.2012 submitted its written representation
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th –20th April 2012 considered the reply
of the institution dated 30.03.2102 and all the relevant documentary evidences
and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under Section 17 of NCTE
Act and accordingly, a Final Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution
on 21.05.2012 for the following deficiencies:1. The institution was given recognition on 25.11.2004 in a temporary leased
premises with a specific condition that the institution should move to a
permanent premise within a period of three years i.e., on or before
25.11.2007. Even after a lapse of time period of 7 years & 04 months, the
management has yet to start the construction of its own building/move to its
own building. The institution stated that a new building was constructed in
the leased land from Govt of Karnataka, which was not brought to the notice
of SRC.NCTE till date.
2. Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is
not submitted.
3. Original building competion certificate from competent Govt. authorized
engineer is not submitted.
4. Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the purpose of
educational institution only is not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue
Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to
educational purposes.
5. Original Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs. 100/- stamp paper duly
attested by oath Commissioner or notary public, is not submitted.
6. Staff details duly approved by the affiliating body is not submitted.
The institution submitted its representation on 12.06.2012.
The SRC in its 236th meeting held on 16th –17th December 2012,considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dated 12.06.2012 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under
NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Final show cause notice was issued on 05.02.2013. The institution has submitted
its written representation on 25.02.2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:


As seen from building plan,Multi purpose hall is having 1294.83 Sq.ft.
which is less as per NCTE norms. As per NCTE regulations, 2009
institution must have Multi purpose hall of size of 2000 Sq.ft.
As seen from the seal of the building plan, Ground Floor is meant for
car parking only and shall not convert for any other purpose. From the
building plan it is observed that Ground Floor is having 255.16 Sq.mts.
Hence,the remaining 5 floors with built up area of 255.16*5=1,275.8
Sq.mts is less as per NCTE norms. As per NCTE regulations 2009, the
instittuion should have 1500 Sq.mts for offering B.Ed course.
As per BCC,the total area mentioned under roofing is 1530.96 Sq.mts.
155
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The column under area is left blank.


BCC is approved by Asst.Director (Town Planning) West Zone,BBMP.
BCC should be approved by the Government Engineer.
Staff list approved by Bangalore University is not Submitted.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by Vivekananda College of Education,
Dr. Raj Kumar Road, 2nd Stage, Rajajinagar, Bangalore-560055, Karnataka,
from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of
students in B.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
71
SRCAPP1090
D.El.Ed
Sri
Dhanalakshmi,
West Godavari
District
AP
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Sri Dhanalakshmi, Plot No. 7-26-20/9, TTD Road-1, Tadepalligudem Village,
& Post, West Godavari District-534101, Andhra Pradesh
Sri Dhanalakshmi Educational Society, Plot No. 7-26-20/9, TTD,
Kalyanamandapam Road, Tadepalligudem Village and Post Office, West
Godavari District-534101, Andhra Pradesh has applied for grant of recognition to
Sri Dhanalakshmi, Plot No. 7-26-20/9, TTD Road-1, Tadepalligudem Village, &
Post, West Godavari District-534101, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed course online
on 29/09/2011 for two years duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993
and received in the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 13/10/2011.
(Dispatched on 10.10.2011)
NCTE-Hqrs had directed to process the applications in accordance with NCTE
Regulations 2009, it amendment Notified on 26th November 2010 which reads as
follows:2 (B) for Sub Regulation (1-A) the following shall be submitted namely. 1 (1-A) (I)
the application shall be summarily rejected under one or more of the following
circumstances:
a. The processing fee, as provided under Rule 9 of the National Council for
Teacher Education Rules, 1997 is not furnished on or before the date of
submission of online application.
b. Hard copy in triplicate of the online application is not dispatched within 7
days of the submission of the online application.
c. Copy of the registered land documents issued by the competent authority
indicating that the society. Institution applying for the course possessed
land on the date of application is not dispatched within 7 days of the
submission of online application.
The SRC considered the matter in its 213th meeting held on 06th-07th November,
2011 and careful perusal of the original file of the institution and other related
156
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
documents, NCTE Act 1993. Regulations and guidelines from time to time laid
on the table. The Regional Committee decided to reject the application on the
following grounds.
a. Hard copy submitted after the stipulated period of 7 days from the
date of on-line submission.
Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution vide no.
F.No.SRCAPP1090(2012-13)/D.El.Ed/AP/2011-12/36214 dated 23/01/2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-382/2012 Appeal
/ 9th Meeting-2012 dated 09/10/2012 stated that “…the council concluded that
there was adequate ground to accept the appeal and remand the case to
the SRC for further processing of the application on merit as per the
regulations”.
In pursuance to the appellate authority order, the application was process and
placed before SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 and
decided to refuse and reject the application as the deficiencies still persist as
under:






Land documents submitted are in Telugu version. Certified copy of
registered Notarized English version of land documents is not submitted.
In the building plan earmarked area for proposed course is not given. And
approved blue print of building plan along with site area and built up area is
not submitted.
Land Use certificate is not submitted. And proceedings of revenue
department not submitted for conversion of land from agricultural to nonagricultural/ educational purpose.
Up to-date Encumbrance Certificate is not submitted.
Building completion certificate in prescribed format is not submitted.
Original FDR’s of Rs.5.00lakhs & Rs.3.00lakhs is not submitted.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution
for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 19/12/2012.
Meantime, Hon’ble High Court order received from Andhra Pradesh in W.P.No.
601 of 2013 dated 04/01/2013 stated that “…this court prima facie finds that
the approach of the Southern Regional Committee of National Council for
Teacher Education, the 2nd respondent herein, in rejecting the application
filed by the petitioner seeking recognition in respect of D.El.Ed course is
totally unsatisfactory, if not arbitrary and capricious. The application was
rejected on earlier occasion through order, dated 23/01/2012 by citing three
reasons. The petitioner filed an appeal before the National Council, the 1st
respondent herein. The grievance was mostly about the delay in
submission of certain documents. The appeal was allowed on 09/01/2012
and the 2nd respondent was directed to pass fresh orders on merits.
157
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
However, after remand, the 2nd respondent passed the impugned order,
dated 19/12/2012, indicating certain new grounds for rejection of the
application. This course is totally impermissible under law.
Hence, the impugned order, dated 19/12/2012, is kept in abeyance and the 2nd
respondent is directed to pass fresh orders confining to the grounds mentioned
in the order dated 23/01/2012 and the directions issued by the appellate
authority in its order dated 09/10/2012. This exercise shall be completed within
three weeks.
Post after three weeks”.
The Committee in its 239th meeting held on 26-27th February, 2012 considered
the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh order dt. 04/01/2013 and all the
relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice
under section 14 of NCTE Act, for the following:

Land documents submitted are in Telugu version, certified copy of registered
Notarised English Version of land document is not submitted.
 Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is
not submitted. In the approved building plan copy submitted, total earmarked
built up area for the proposed course and site area, is not mentioned.
 Original building completion certificate in a prescribed format from competent
Govt. engineer is not submitted.
 Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that
the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational purpose is
not submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for
conversion of land from agricultural to non-agricultural/educational purposes.
 Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.
 Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a
Nationalised Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name is not given.
Accordigly, a show cause notice was issued to the institutionon 14.03.2013. The
institution has submitted its written representation on 28.03.2013.
72
APS0535
B.Ed
Sri Seva
Nagaiah
Memorial
College of
Teacher
The Committee considered the reply of the institution dt.28-03-2013 and all
other relevant documents and decided to cause inspection under section
14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to
the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the
institution, as per the norms.
Sri Seva Nagaiah Memorial College of Teacher Education, Krishna District,
Andhra Pradesh
made an application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE,
Bangalore on 10/12/1998.
The application was processed and after considering the report of the visiting
team as well as other relevant materials granted recognition to the institution
for offering B.Ed course with an intake of 90 students vide order dated
158
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Education,
Krishna District
AP
07.09.2000
The institution was granted recognition with a condition that the institution
shall shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of
recognition.(In case the
course started in rented premises)
The institution in its letter dated 10.11.2009 has submitted proposal for shifting
the B.Ed
Course to the new location with D.D of Rs. 40,000/- vide no.
634986 dated 10/12/2009
Accordingly, shifting inspection of the institution was carried out on 09/02/2011.
The management is also running D.Ed course in the same building.
The SRC in its 206th meeting held on 9th – 10th June 2011, considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve show cause notice under section 17 of the NCTE Act. Accordingly,
show cause notice was
issued to the institution on 07/07/2011. The
institution has submitted its written representation along with relevant documents
on 05.08.2011.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st – 23rd September, 2011 considered the
reply of the institution dated 05.08.2011 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it
was decided to serve Final Show cause notice under
Section 17 of the NCTE Act.
Accordingly a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on
14.11.2011.The institution has submitted written representation for B.Ed and
D.Ed courses on 14.12.2011.
The SRC in its 216th meeting held on 11th and 12th January, 2012 considered the
written reply of the institution vide letter dt. 14.12.2011 on the above matter and
also the
relevant documents of the institution, the deficiencies still persists
and decided to withdraw recognition of the institution for both D.Ed and B.Ed
courses for the following reasons :




Building completion certificate in the prescribed format from competent
Govt. authorized engineer is not submitted.
Fresh renewed FDR for Rs. 5 lakhs towards Endowment fund and 3
lakhs Reserve fund from a nationalized bank in joint account is not
submitted.
Salary to the staff is paid by cash instead through Cheque/Bank.
No furniture in Seminar hall.
Accordingly, withdrawal order was issued to the institution vide no. F.No.
APS00535/B.Ed/AP/2012-13/37887 dated 22.02.2012
Aggrieved by the Withdrawal order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE- Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order no. F.No.89-193/2012
Appeal /5th Meeting-2012 dated 18/06/2012 states that “the council concluded
that there was adequate ground to remand the matter to the SRC to cause reinspection of the institution for B.Ed course after obtaining a payment of
Rs.40,000/- from the institution and take decision thereafter. The SRC may take
an independent decision on the withdrawal of recognition for D.EI.Ed course.”
159
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
In pursuance to the Appellate authority order dated 18/06/2012, the institution in
its written representation
dated 20/06/2012 has submitted a D .D no.
873176 of Rs. 40,000/- dated 20/06/2012 of State Bank of India towards
inspection fee, received in this office on 26/06/2012.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th September 2012, considered the
show cause notice reply of the institution and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause Re-inspection on payment of Rs. 50000/-, under NCTE Act, to
examine whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for
the proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any,
were duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.(The institution has
submitted DD of Rs.40,000/- as per appellate authority for re-inspection fee and
as per SRC decision of Rs.10,000/- has not submitted)
Further, the committee decided to confirm the earlier decision of withdrawal of
recognition to D.El.Ed course (APS02827), taken in its 216th meeting held on
21st-23rd January, 2012, since no appeal was filed against it.
As per the decision of SRC, the inspection of the institution was fixed
between15th-20th November 2012. The same was intimated to institution on
05.11.2012 (reposted on 14.11.2012). The inspection was conducted on
16.11.2012. The VT report was received by SRC on 21.11.2012.
The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 05th-06th January 2013, considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for the following:

Certified copy of the land documents (sale deed) from Sub-Registrar is
not submitted.

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil
authority is not submitted.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. engineer is
not submitted.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational
purpose is not submitted.

Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted.

Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in joint name is not given.

Bye-law of the Society (Certificate of Registration of Society) are not
submitted.

As per VT report, the size of the multipurpose hall is only 288 sq.ft. which
is less than the requirement of 2000 sq.ft. as per NCTE norms.
160
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

As per VT report, total built up area available for B.Ed course is only
9980 sq.ft, which is less than the requirement of 16000 sq.ft as per NCTE
Norms.

As per Staff list provided, the principal is not qualified for the post, as he
is not having Ph.D. qualification.

The institution has not submitted salary particulars of the staff members.

The institution has not provided the list of books and furniture provided in
the library.

Original approved staff list from the affiliating body/University is not
submitted.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.02.2013.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 22.03.2013 &
04.04.2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
As per Encumbrance Certificate latest transaction reflects Gift Deed dt.
29.01.2005 but institution submitted Sale Deed. To be clarified by
institution.

Original approved staff list from Krishna University is to be submitted.

As per the decision of SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th
September 2012, The institution has submitted DD of Rs.40,000/- as per
appellate authority for re-inspection fee and as per decision of SRC
Rs.10,000/- has not submitted.

The instituion has not appointed the faculty as per NCTE norms.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by Sri Seva Nagaiah Memorial College
of Teacher Education, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh
made an
application for B.Ed course to SRC, NCTE, Bangalore on 10/12/1998. from
the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of
students in B.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
161
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
73
APS01996
B.Ed
Sri
NIrvanaswamy
College of
Education,
Bangalore
Rural District
KA
Sri. Nirvanaswamy College of Education, Sree Degula Math, Kanakapura562117, Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka.
Sri. Nirvanaswamy College of Education, Sree Degula Math, Kanakapur-562117,
Bangalore Rural District, Karnataka was granted recognition for offering B.Ed
course with an intake of 100 students vide order dated 02.12.2004.
The institution vide its letter dated 17.10.2007 submitted a proposal for shifting of
premises along with D.D.of Rs.40,000/- towards shifting fee. Inspection was
carried out on 25th October, 2010. The inspection report was received along with
VCD.
The SRC in its 198th meeting held on 24th –26th November, 2010 considered the
VT report and all relevant documentary evidences and decided to issue
Showcause Notice. Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the
institution on 10.01.2011 for the following deficiencies:

The total Built up area earmarked for the B.Ed programme is only 8788 Sq. ft
and for D.Ed programme is 5576 Sq.ft which is grossly inadequate for both
the Teacher Education Programmes as per NCTE norms. The same is also
corroborated by the management by affixing signature of the management
representative in the essential data.
The institute has not submitted the Land useage certificate from a competent
Govt. approved authority.
The institution submitted its written representation on 07.02.2011.
The SRC in its 201st meeting held on 22nd –23rd February 2011 considered the
reply to Show Cause Notice, VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary
evidences and decided to issue Final Showcause Notice. Accordingly, a Final
Showcase Notice was issued to the institution on 18.03.2011 for the following
deficiencies:1. The institution has to submit details of built up area earmarked for both D.Ed
and B.Ed courses.
2. Building completion certificate from the authorised competent Governemnt
Engineer in the prescribed format to be submitted.
3. Land Usage Certificate from the competent Government authority to be
submitted. Land Usage Certificate from the competent authority to be
submitted.
The institution submitted its written representation on 15.04.2011.
The SRC in its 205th meeting held on 18th –19th May, 2011 considered written
representation of the institution and decided to issue Show Cause Notice and
Showcase notice was issued to the institution on 27.06.2011 for the following
deficiencies:


Approved Building plan from competent Govt. authority is to be submitted.
Approved Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government authorities
stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for Educational
Purposes.
In the same building in the first floor a PU College is functioning and in the third
floor of the same building an I.T.I is also functioning. The management is
sharing B.Ed course along with the other programmes.
The institution has submitted its representation on 29.07.2011.
162
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The SRC in its 210th meeting held on 22nd – 23rd August considered the written
reply of the institution dated 29.07.2011 on the above matter and also the
relevant documents of the institution and decided to withdraw recognition for the
following reasons: In the same building in the first floor, a PU College is functioning and in the
third floor of the same building, an I.T.I is also functioning. The management is
sharing B.Ed course along with the other programmes. The management has
admitted that Pre-University course classes are being in the same building in
which B.Ed course is being run.
 Approved Land Usage Certificate from the concerned Government
authorities stating that the land is exclusively permitted/ sanctioned for
Educational Purposes.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the recognition of
the B.Ed course (APS01996) run by the Sri Nirvanaswamy College of
Education,Sree Degula Math, Kanakaapur-562117, Bangalore Rural District,
Karnataka, from the academic year 2012.13, in order to enable the ongoing
batch of students in B.Ed, course, if any, to complete their course. Accordingly,
a withdrawal order was issued to the institution for B.Ed. course on 10.10.2011.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal order, the institution has approached appellate
authority. Shri.K.R. Jayadevappa, Principal, Sri Nirvanaswamy College of
Education, Bangalore, Karnataka presented the case of the appellant institution
on 18-01-2012. In the appeal and during personal presentation it was submitted
that a) as the PU College building was under renovation and the new block was
under construction, a few PU classes were held temporarily in the same building
at the time of inspection. Now the PU College classes were being held
separately in its own building, exclusively meant for PU College; b) SRC’s
observations that, ITI was also functioning in the third floor of the same building,
was factually incorrect. The building where B.Ed. College was functioning did not
have third floor at all (photo copy of the building is enclosed for your kind
verification). The ITI college was being run in a separate building by the
management and this building was about 3Km away from the B.Ed. College
premises. Further Bangalore University, had renewed the affiliation of B.Ed.
course for the academic year 2011-12 vide its notification No. 3/ 4/2011-12 dated
22/07/2011. (copy is enclosed for your kind verification); c) As the College
building comes under Budikuppe "Gramathana", conversion of agriculture land
into non-agriculture land does not arise.
The Council was, in view of the submission made by the appellant, observed that
a re-inspection of the institution is required to be caused in order to verify the
claims of the appellant for providing exclusive and adequate infrastructure and
instructional facilities for B.Ed. College of Education. The Council, therefore,
concluded that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with a
direction to SRC for causing re-inspection of the institution after obtaining a
payment of Rs. 40,000/- from the institution.
The appellate authority vide its order F.No.89-449/2011 dated 15.2.2012 stated
that there was adequate justification in accepting the appeal with a direction to
SRC for causing Re-Inspection of the institution after obtaining a payment
of Rs. 40,000/- from the institution.
The matter was placed before 218th meeting of SRC held on 28th February, 2012
and the decision of the appellate authority was informed to the institution on
2.4.2012. The institution submitted a written representation dated 11.4.4012
163
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
enclosing Demand Draft No.383392 dated 11.4.2012 for Rs.40,000/- towards
inspection fee. Accordingly, the inspection of the institution was carried out on
12.07.2012.
The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 21st- 22nd November,2012 considered the
VT report,VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show Cause Notice under NCTE act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued on 31.12.2012. The institution has
submitted a written representation on 22.01.2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:







The sale deed is registered in the name of individual Sri Sri Sri
Mummadi Nirvanaswamy and not in the name of institution as per
NCTE regulations 2009.
The original blue print of building plan approved by the Competent
authority is not submitted. As per the copy of blue print at Sy.No.276,
property No.359 the built up area for Nirvanaswamy College is having First
Floor-8788 Sq.ft. and Second Floor – 8788 Sq.ft As per copy of blue print
of building plan at Sy.No.276 for, the existing D.Ed College is having
11917 Sq.ft. of built up area.
As per copy of BCC dated 04.06.2009, Ground Floor-8788 Sq.ft,First
Floor- 8788 Sq.ft,Second Floor- 8788Sq.ft at Sy.No. 276 is available in
the name of Sree Sree Sree Mummadi NirvanaSwamigalu,President,Sri
Degula Math. As per copy of BCC,the land is in individual name and not
in the name of the institution. The original BCC approved by the
Government Engineer is not submitted by the College.
In BCC the institution has not earmarked built up area for offering B.Ed
& D.Ed course exclusively
The built up area as per BCC and building plan are not matching.
A copy of LUC dated 19/01/2013 issued by village development officer
or Sy.No 276 in the name of Sri Mummadi Nirvanaswamiji,Sri Degula
Math,Kanakapura for construction of Sri Nirvanaswamy College of
Education is submitted.
The size of Multipurpose Hall is 1030 Sq.ft which is less and not as per
NCTE regultions,2009.
Appointment of Principal is not approved by the Tumkur University.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by Sri. Nirvanaswamy College of
Education, Sree Degula Math, Kanakapura-562117, Bangalore Rural District,
Karnataka, from the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing
batch of students in B.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
164
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
74
APS01346
D.Ed
Dr. Ambedkar
Memorial
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Thrissur
KL
Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Teacher Training Institute, T.J.A M Corporation
Building 4th Floor, Kuruppam Road Junction Round South, Thrissur
Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Teacher Training Institute, T.J.A M Corporation Building
4th Floor, Kuruppam Road Junction Round South, Thrissur was granted
recognition on 18.10.2004 for Elementary course of two years duration from the
academic session 2004-05 with an annual intake of 50 students.
On 31.8.2009, the Government of Kerala made a complaint against Dr.
Ambedkar Memorial Teacher Training Institute, T.J.A M Corporation Building 4th
Floor, Kuruppam Road Junction Round South, Thrissur as below:“Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Teachers Training Institute, T.J.A.M. Corporation
Building, 4th floor, Kuruppam Road, Junction Round South, Thrissur has been
granted
recognition
to
start
TTI
vide
order
no.
F.KL/ELE/N/125/SRO/NCTE/2004-05/8042 dated 18.10.2004.
The TTI is functioning at the above address. However, on receipt of widespread
Complaints about the functioning and the qualification/eligibility of the principal
and staff of the TTI, the District Collector, Thrissur and Additional District
Magistrate visited the institution and verified the facts. The report amongst other
things states that the Principal, Dr. B. Soman was unable to submit any
testimonials to prove his Educational Qualification or teaching experience and
the Educational qualification of the teacher who was conducting the class was
mere TTC. It was also found that the institute was functioning in a narrow room
without any facilities to accommodate more than 40 boys and girls. There were
also other complaints regarding the functioning of the TTI.
An enquiry has also been conducted by the Deputy Director of Education
(QIP)(copy enclosed) which also confirms gross violation of the NCTE norms.
Accordingly, Government have issued instructions to allow the TTI to function
from 2009-10 after inspecting that all the Government/NCTE norms have been
fulfilled.
Hence, the Secretary, Government of Kerala had requested SRC-NCTE to
inspect the institution and to take appropriate action as deemed fit, since NCTE
is the competent authority to accord/withdraw recognition to the TTIs.”
A letter was already issued to the institution on 21.8.2007, requesting to submit
Rs. 40,000/- towards shifting fee, since the institution had completed three years
in temporary premises from the date of grant of recognition. The institution
submitted Rs. 40,000/- as inspection fee, which was taken into account on
8.10.2007. Again, one more letter was issued to the institution on 29.5.2009
regarding proposal for shifting the institution to the permanent building and
asking them to submit essential documents for shifting of the institution. The
institution submitted a written representation on 25.6.2009 stating that joint
account of Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs. 3 lakhs is not submitted and also stating that some
more works have to be completed for shifting and requested for four months time,
till the end of October, 2009.
165
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The institution was required to shift to new premises by end of session 2006-07.
It has submitted inspection fee on 8.10.2007. The institution should have been
caused inspection by the end of session 2006-07 which did not occur. After
expiry of another two sessions even now, the institution, as per its letter is not
prepared for shifting as some construction work is still going on.
The above matter was placed before 187th meeting of SRC held on 29-30
December, 2009 and the Committee considered the matter and decided to issue
Show Cause Notice and Notice was issued to the institution on 5.2.2010 under
Section 17 of NCTE Act for the following reasons:4. The institution was required to shift to new premises by end of session 200607.
5. After end of the session, even now(after over two more years) not prepared
to shift as some construction still going on.
The institution submitted reply to the Notice on 1.3.2010. The institution has
stated that
“The complaint of Government of Kerala is based on the false report of
the then Dy. Director of Education, Ayyanthole, Thrissur who has malice motive
against this institution for not complying her vested interest. Another reference is
that the District Collector, Thrissur had verified the facts of this institute. Actually
the District collector had verified the C.H.M.K.M. PPTTI, Thrissur under the same
charitable Society and sent a report about this institute mistakenly. The District
Collector called us “Scheduled castes, the down trodden community”. This
caused the enmity against him and hence not submitted any records called for
by him for verification.
The statement showing the details of staff approved by the Director, SCERT,
Thiruvananthapuram was forwarded to the NCTE regional office at Bangalore as
soon as it was approved. A copy of the list is forwarded along with this. The
staff mentioned in the statement were handling the classes at that time. But the
space was insufficient as is reported by the then District Collector. We will shift
this institute in a permanent building by 31-3-2010 and compliance report to the
NCTE. As per para 6, a joint account each for Rs.5 lakhs and 3 lakhs were not
operated. As per instruction a joint action of 5 lakhs was operated and the
certificate to the effect was forwarded to the NCTE then and there. A copy of the
certificate is enclosed herewith. But, there was no instruction of operation a joint
account for Rs.3 lakhs. That 3 lakhs was used for the disbursement of salary
staff and as such it was not possible to operate as joint account. A property of 1
acre 89 cents was purchased for the construction of institute building. But
unfortunately the construction was held up as there was rock under the top soil.
Now, that we have advanced for a land of 55 cents with a school building for 12
lakhs of rupees for the purchase of a total of 55 lakhs rupees. The rest of 43
lakhs of Rupees have to be paid during march 2010. On 31 March 2010, 23 we
will shift the institution to the permanent building.”
Again on 30.3.2011, the Manager of the institution had requested for renewal of
recognition. The Manager of the institution had stated that “50 cents of land with
spacious buildings were purchased for Rs.60 lakhs during July 2010 for housing
166
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Teacher Training Institute. The adjacent plot of 44
cents of land also advanced for the purchase of additional land for the Teacher
Training Institute and has requested for visit to the institution.”
On 24.08.2011, the Manager had requested for renewal of recognition and had
stated that “If the visit of new premises is very late, it is not possible to invite
applications and admit the students this year. I therefore request the SRC may
be pleased to arrange a visit to arrange a visit to the new premises as early as
possible”.
On 28.11.2011, the Manager forwarded copy of receipt forwarding of proof of
having Joint account of Endowment fund and Reserve fund and has requested
to pay visit to the institute for approval of shifting the institute in permanent
building.
As seen from the file, the representations of the institution were not placed
before the Committee and inspection was not conducted.
The Manager of the institution vide letter dated 31.1.2012 stated that they are in
a pathetic condition as the continuous sanction is not received and they wanted
to withdraw the money deposited in two joint accounts.
The SRC in its 217th meeting held on 8th- 9th February 2012 considered the
written reply dated. 9.3.2010 and other relevant documents submitted by the
institution and decided to cause Shifting
inspection at the new premises and to ascertain infrastructural and instructional
facilities Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. The committee also taken the decision
of advising the VT to look into the complaint received from the Kerala Govt.
The SRC in its 223rd meeting held on 29th – 31st May 2012 has considered
the VT report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice Under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
25.06.2012 .
The institution submitted its written representations on 06.07.2012,16.07.2012
,01.08.2012 and 16.08.2012.was placed before 235th meeting of SRC held on
21st -22nd November 2012. The committee deferred the matter. In addition to
the above, the institution has submitted reply to the notice on 17/10/2012.
The Southern Regional Committee in its 236th meeting held on 16th – 17th
December 2012 considered the reply of the institution vide letter dated
17.10.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 05/02/2013. The
institution has submitted a representation on 11/03/2013
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:167
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

The institution has not submitted any documentary proof to prove the
rectification of
infrastructural facilities.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the D.Ed course run by Dr. Ambedkar Memorial Teacher
Training Institute, T.J.A M Corporation Building 4th Floor, Kuruppam Road
Junction Round South, Thrissur Kerala, from the academic year 2013-14, in
order to enable the ongoing batch of students in D.Ed course, if any, to
complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
75
APS04070/
APS04839
D.T.Ed/ D.T.EdAI
A.C.T. Teacher
Training
Institute,
Chennai
TN
A.C.T.Teacher Training Institute, No.1, Ganapathi Street, Mogappair Extension,
Ayyanambakkam, Maduravayal Post, Chennai-600095, Tamil Nadu.
A.C.T.Teacher Training Institute, No.1, Ganapathi Street, Mogappair Extension,
Ayyanambakkam, Maduravayal Post, Chennai-600095, Tamil Nadu has submitted
application for D.T.Ed and D.T.Ed-Al course on 31.12.2004 and 29.12.2005. The
institution has been granted recognition for D.T.Ed and D.T.Ed-Al on 18.11.2005 and
31.1.2007 respectively with an intake of 50 students, thus making an annual intake
of 100 students, with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from the
date of recognition.
The institution has submitted D.D.No.996528 dated 14.7.2011 for Rs.40000/towards processing fees for shifting the premises.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st -23rd September, 2011 has considered the
written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and decided
to cause Shifting inspection at the new premises, to ascertain infrastructural and
instructional facilities Under Section 17 of NCTE Act. Accordingly, inspection was
carried out on 16.02.2012.
The SRC in its 224th meeting held on 14-17 June 2012, considered the VTR, VCD
and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause
Notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued to the institution on 09.07.2012.
The institution submitted its reply on 31.07.2012.
The 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012 has considered the reply of the
institution vide letter dt. 31.07.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE Act. Accordingly,
Final Show Cause notice was issued to the institution on 30.10.2012. The institution
had submitted written representation on 12.03.2012.
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
Original certified copy of land documents from the Sub-Registrar is not
submitted.
168
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013






Blue print of building plan is not submitted.
The institution has submitted photocopy of Non-Encumbrance certificate
dt 21.02.2013 is Regional Language mentioning that “Deposit of title deeds
if loan is repayable on demand”, which needs clarification. Further,
Notarized English version not submitted.
The institution has not submitted documentary proof for appointing
Lecturer in Foundation course.
The institution has not submitted documentary proof for appointing
lecturer(s) in Fine Arts and also the lecture identified is not eligible as the
lecturer is not having requisite qualification of MA degree in Fine Arts as
per norms.
Bills for purchase of language learning lab is not submitted.
The institution has agreed that the loan will be paid as per the schedules
on demand from the Bank.
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the D.T.Ed & D.T.Ed-Al courses run by A.C.T.Teacher
Training Institute, No.1, Ganapathi Street, Mogappair Extension,
Ayyanambakkam, Maduravayal Post, Chennai-600095, Tamil Nadu., from
the academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of
students in D.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
76
APS06188
B.Ed
A.C.T. College
of Education,
Tiruvallur
District
TN
A.C.T. College of Education, No.1, Ganapathy Street, Ayyanambakkam,
Mogappair West Extension, Maduravoil Post, Tiruvallur District, Pin600095, Tamilnadu.
A.C.T. College of Education, No.1, Ganapathy Street, Ayyanambakkam,
Mogappair West Extension, Maduravoil Post, Tiruvallur District, Pin-600095,
Tamilnadu has submitted application for B.Ed course on 03.01.2005. The
institution has been granted recognition for B.Ed on 03.02.2007 with an intake of
100 students with the condition to shift to its own premises within 3 years from
the date of recognition.
The institution has submitted D.D. no.996527 dated 14.07.2011 for Rs.40,000/towards processing fees for shifting the premises.
The SRC in its 211th meeting held on 21st-23rd September, 2011 considered the
written reply and other relevant documents submitted by the institution and
decided to cause Shifting inspection at the new premises and to ascertain
infrastructural and instructional facilities. Accordingly, the inspection of the
institution was conducted on 19.02.2012.
The SRC in its 224th meeting held on 14th-17th June 2012, considered the
VTR, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided
169
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
to serve Show cause Notice. Accordingly, Show cause notice was issued
to the institution on 06.07.2012. The institution submitted its reply on
31.07.2012.
The SRC in its 230th meeting held on 16th-17th August, 2012 considered the
reply of the institution vide letter dt. 31.07.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice under NCTE
Act. Accordingly, a Final Show cause notice was issued to the institution on
10.09.2012.
The institution had submitted its written representation on
04.10.2012.
The Committee in its 236th meeting held on 16-18th December, 2012 considered
the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 04.10.2012 and all the relevant
documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final Show cause Notice
under NCTE Act, for the following:

In the approved building plan submitted, total land area is not mentioned, the
approval of the competent authority is pasted on the back side of the building
plan, which is not permissible. The institution has not submitted blue print of
the building plan duly approved by the competent authority.

The institution has submitted true copy of sale deed executed on
28.09.2005, where encumbrance certificate reflects from 01.01.2011 to
11.06.2012 executed by “Dena Bank” Chennai, which needs clarification.

Notarised Non-encumbrance certificate is submitted, but original Nonencumbrance certificate since 2005 is not submitted.
Encumbrance
certificate dt. 12.06.2012 reflects “Deeds of loan is repayable on demand”.

Revised original affidavit showing the built up area is not submitted.

As per Affidavit submitted dt. 23.07.2012, total built up area shown as 3023
sq.mtrs, whereas, as per building plan it is 4860 sq.mtrs, and also Sy.Nos
are not tallying, which needs to be clarified.

Staff profile as per Annexure I,II & III along with Qualification certificates not
submitted.

The institution has not submitted individual A/c Nos. of each staff for payment
of salary.
Accordingly, Final show cause notice was issued to the institution on
11.02.2013. The institution had submitted written representation on 12.03.2013.
The Committee considered the written reply of the institution on the above
matter and also the relevant documents of the institution and decided to
withdraw recognition for the following reasons:
The institution has not submitted Blue print of Building plan duly
approved by competent authority.
170
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

The institution has
certificate transaction
“Deposit of title deeds
institution has agreed
Bank”.

Staff profile as per Annexure I, II & III is not submitted.

Approved staff list from the affiliating body is not submitted.
submitted photocopy of non-encumbrance
have been shown 21.02.2013 mentioning
if loan is repayable on demand”. Further, the
that the loan created in favour of the”Dena
Based on the above points the committee decides to withdraw the
recognition of the B.Ed course run by. A.C.T. College of Education, No.1,
Ganapathy Street, Ayyanambakkam, Mogappair West Extension,
Maduravoil Post, Tiruvallur District, Pin-600095, Tamilnadu., from the
academic year 2013-14, in order to enable the ongoing batch of students in
B.Ed course, if any, to complete their course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
77
SRCAPP681
D.El.Ed
M.V.R. Institute
of Teacher
Training,
Chittoor District
AP
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
M.V.R Institute of Teacher Training, K. No.50, Plot No. 19-9-3E/5, 19th Street,
Tirupati Village, Head Post, Tirupati (Urban) Taluk, Chittoor District-517501,
Andhra Pradesh
Mandyam Educational Society, No. 19-9-3E/5, Tiruchanoor Road, Tirupati
Village, Head Post Office, Tirupati (urban) Taluk, Chittoor Disrict-517501,
Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to M.V.R Institute of Teacher
Training, K. No.50, Plot No. 19-9-3E/5, 19th Street, Tirupati Village, Head Post,
Tirupati (Urban) Taluk, Chittoor District-517501, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed
Course for two years duration under Section 15(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 25/092011. The institution has
submitted hard copy of the application on 27/09/2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08/11/2011 followed by reminder on 03/01/2012
a deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 23/12/2011.
The institution has not submitted reply for deficiency letter even after stipulated
period of 60 days (111 days).
As per sub-clause (1) of clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the applicant institutions
is required to submit deficiencies to the Southern Regional Committee Office within
60 days from the date of receipt of communication of deficiencies, failing which the
application will be treated as rejected and closed, no extension of time will be
granted and any submission received after 60 days will be treated as invalid and not
entertained.
The Southern Regional Committee in its 221st Meeting held on 19th-20th April, 2012
171
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
noted the non-submission of reply to the DL letter by the institution and decided to
refuse and reject the application for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection letter was issued to the institution vide
F.No.SRCAPP681(2012-13)/D.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/41834 dated 30/05/2012.
no.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to NCTEHqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No. 89-397/2012 Appeal / 8th
Meeting-2012/A57074 dated 05/09/2012 stated that “…the council concluded that
there was adequate justification to accept the appeal and remand the case to
SRC for considering the reply of the institution and for taking further decision
thereafter. The institution is directed to submit a copy of the reply dated
15/02/2012 again to the SRC”.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th September, 2012, considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 05/09/2012 and decided to process the file of the
institution on merit as per Regulations.
The SRC in its 234th Meeting held on 17th-18th October, 2012 considered the matter
and decided to process further. In para 4 of the order dated 05/9/2012. The appellate
authority directed the institution to submit a copy of the reply dated 15/02/2012 again
to SRC. Although, the institution vide letter dated 2/11/2012 has submitted a copy of
the letter dated 15/02/2012 but without any supporting documents. A letter was sent
to institution on 21/11/2012. Accordingly, the institution has submitted written
representation on 30/11/2012.
The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 05th-06th January 2013, considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt. 30/11/2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences
and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act,
for the following:

As per notarized copy of Gift deed total site area is not mentioned.

Blue print of building plan is submitted it is approved by commissioner
Tirupati Municipality and earmarked area for proposed course is not given.

Notarized copy of upto-date encumbrance certificate is required.

In the affidavit Sy.No. is not mentioned.

Original FDR’s of Rs.5.00lakhs and Rs.3.00lakhs is not submitted.

The institution is already ruining B.Ed course, as admitted vide letter dated
15/02/2012 (P-222/c), land area of 2705 sq.mts and built up area 2342.55
sq.mts is grossly inadequate to run B.Ed & D.Ed course).

Land use certificate is not notarized.

Proof of completion of 3 academic session of B.Ed course grant on
17/09/2010 (P-107/c) is not submitted.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 21.02.2013. The
institution has submitted its written representation on 12.03.2013.
The committee considered the matter and advised Southern Regional
172
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Office to put up together with B.Ed as well as D.El.Ed courses run by the
institution and re-submit in next SRC meeting.
78
SRCAPP1198
B.Ed
Mother Theresa
College of
B.Ed,
Khammam
District
AP
Mother Theresa College of B.Ed, K.No.20/45, Gandhinagar Village, Bhadrachalam
Taluka & Town, Khammam District-507111, Andhra Pradesh
Savior Educational Society, H.No.1-50, Pinapaka Pattinagar, Burgamphad
Taluka & Town, Khammam District-507114, Andhra Pradesh had applied for
grant of recognition to Mother Theresa College of B.Ed, K.No.20/45,
Gandhinagar Village, Bhadrachalam Taluka & Town, Khammam District507111, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under
Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee,
NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been received in the
office of SRC on 03.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 03.11.2011 / 22.12.2011 (Reminder). A
deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has
replied to the deficiency letter on 27.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30-31st March 2012, considered the reply
of the institution dt. 27.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and
it was decided to serve show cause notice under section 14(1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.04.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 17.05.2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered by SRC
in its 223rd Meeting held on 29th-31st May, 2012 the reply is unconvincing and not
satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:


The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the
competent authority from the State Govt. as B.Ed is banned in the State of
Andhra Pradesh.
The institution has applied with the same society name for two courses, Viz:
1) SRCAPP1198 & 2) SRCAPP1181 for academic session 2012-2013 in the
same District. Applying for more than one course in the same Sy.No.20/45,
same location is not permissible as per NCTE regulations 2009.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as
per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution
for recognition of B.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 27/06/2012.
The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority
vide order no. F.No.89-460/2012 Appeal/9th Meeting-2012 dated 20.10.2012 has
stated as follows:
“after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and
173
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
after considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the
council concluded that there was adequate justification to remand
the case to the SRC for further processing as per the NCTE
Regulations.”
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 20th-21st November, 2012 considered the
appellate authority order dated 10/10/2012 and has decided to process the
application.
The SRC in its 237th meeting held on 5th-6th January 2013, considered the VT
report, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to
serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is not
submitted.
Notarised English version of the certified copy land
documents not submitted. In the building plan earmarked area for
proposed course is not given.

Notarised land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating
that the agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the educational
purpose is not submitted.

Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not
submitted.

Original FDR’s of Rs.5.00lakhs & Rs.3.00lakhs is not submitted.

Same Sy. No and location as per Building completion certificate &
Building plan for the application Code SRCAPP 1160 & SRCAPP1998.

The institution has not submitted valid minority certificate issued by the
competent authority from the State Govt. as B.Ed is banned in the State
of Andhra Pradesh.

Name, Address, signature of the correspondent of both the Societies are
same.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.02.2013.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 15.03.2013
The committee considered the matter and advised Southern Regional
Office to re-submit in next SRC meeting.
Volume-05
Consideration of Complaint Cases
79
APS07137
B.Ed
Jay Bees
Training
College of
Jay bees Training College of B.Ed, Kuttoor P.O, Mathamangalam. Kannur
District – 607307, Kerala.
Jaybees Charitable Society, Kannur District, Kerala has submitted an
application to the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of recognition
to Jaybees Training College of B.Ed, Kuttor P.O, Mathamangalam, Kannur
174
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
B.Ed, Kannur
District
KL
District – 607307, Kerala for Secondary ( B.Ed) course of one year duration
with an annual intake of 100( Hundred) Students vide Order no. 15289 dated
26/11/2007 with a condition to shift to its own premises/building within three
years from the date of recognition.(in case the course is started in rented
premises).
A complaint letter is received on 11/02/2013 from The B.Ed Students, Jaybees
Training College of B.Ed, Kuttor, Mathamangalam, Kannur, Kerala which is as
under:“We are the B.Ed Students of Jaybees Training College of B.Ed Who have just
completed the B.Ed in 2012. We were100 students under 5 options which are
English, Maths, Commerce, Ohysical Science and Social Science. We received
admission in October 2011 and completed the course in October 2012. Our
results have been just published by the Kannur University on 4th January2013.
At the time of admission the college management had collected Rs.35,000 from
each student without issuing original receipt. Only a hand written provisional
receipt was issued to us. The fees fixed by the Govt. of Kerala for the B.Ed
course in self financing colleges in only 29.000 Rupees. But 6000 rupees extra
but 2000 rupees was refunded as caution money and the total 6000 rupees goes
to the college management
We enquired the reasons for collecting the additional 6000 rupees from us. The
Office clerk who collected the amount had told us that it was collected for
meeting the expenses from university. It was unbelievable to us that 6000
rupees are to be paid to the University for completing the course. So we
contacted our Friends studying in other B.Ed colleges under Kannur University to
Know the truth. They told us that their management also collected 5000 Rupees
extra but for meeting the expenses of uniforms. Record books, one day tour etc
plus the caution money.
We complained the Principal and the teachers about it and demanded to get
record book, uniform, one day tour etc at no extra cost. But they were helpless
and they told us that it was the decision of the management. The Principal and
teachers felt sympathy towards us and gave us moral support to fight against the
injustice done by the management.
We have submitted a memorandum signed by all students to the Chairman of
the college management. In our memorandum, we asked the Chairman to
produce the bills and other receipt of expenses of 6000 Rupees collected
additionally from the students. We believed that it was our right to know how the
amount had been spent by the management. The Chairman just said that it all
goes to the University but he was not ready to produce the proof of university
remittance. After a long discussion, he finally agreed to supply the record books
at extra payments for uniform, One day tour etc, and the provision of refunding
the caution money was suspended in spite of our strong protest.
We decided to inform the matter to NCTE but only offer the publications of the
results of B.Ed examination because we were afraid of principal assessment and
other consequences. As the results have been now published, we are sending
you the original copy of our memorandum submitted to the Chairman of College
Management. It is written in Malayalam and therefore, its English translation is
175
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
also enclosed. We request you to consider it and direct the management to
refund rupees 2000 per hard as our caution deposit at the earliest.
As the students who have just completed the B.Ed from jaybees Training
College of B.Ed we would like to put-up the fillowing suggestions to NCTE for the
sake of the students who may take admission in this college in further.
1.
There is no Librarian in the college Library. Only one Office Clerk is there
and he has no knowledge no books. So please direct the Management to
appoint a full time Librarian in the College Library.
2.
Books in the library related to B.Ed are quiet insufficient. When we
Complained about it to the Principal, he agreed that the books are insufficient but
he was helpless due to the non- Co- operation of Management. We are sorry to
in from you that the library is largely filled with old and useless Malayalam and
English Novels . Please direct the Management to make the Library update with
sufficient number of books on B.Ed options.
3.
There are no journals and news papers in the library, in other B.Ed colleges,
our friends told us that they have sufficient number of Educational journals,
General journals, English news papers etc which helped them a lot to prepare for
NCTE, SET examinations. But we had no such facilities in the library.
4.
We have no separate Psychology lab, moths lab etc for intensive practical
work. Our psychology lecturer is lovable and efficient, so he has brought the
Xerox copies of a few psychology tests to give us guidance in Psychology
practical work. The Management has no interest in the academic improvement of
students. We have better academic results only because of the hard work done
by our teachers. Their dedication and sincerely is highly appreciable.
5.
There is no practice of issuing Original receipt for the fees and other
payments made to the college. We are just asked to pay 35000 rupees at the
time of admission. But we have no idea on how much is the tuition fee,
admission fee, cautions money etc. The office clerk issued us a provisional
receipt showing just that the specific amount is received. So we have no proof to
claim the caution money. You may please direct the management to issue
original receipt on caution deposit and refund the same immediately after the
course.
6.
We have a college bus service. Its service is regular and we have no
complaint about it. But the bus fare is collected for the entire one year and in
lump sum. We have one month vacation and one and a half month teaching
practice, and there is no college bus service during this month. But we are forced
to pay the whole amount for the full academic year without any reduction for the
month in which there is no bus service. Again the college office follows the same
practice of issuing hand written provisional receipt to collect the college bus fare.
We are sorry to in form you that we were never issued original receipt for any
payments made to the college office.
7.
Our friends studying in other B.Ed colleges told us that they had several
GUEST TALKS AND SEMINARS on variety of topics conducted by eminent
personalities invited from other campuses. But we were given very few
GUESTTALKS. Our principal and teachers were really interested only very
176
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
limited amount for the guest take and other use full programmes.
Once again we kindly inform you that we have no complaint about our Principal
and Teachers. But, the aim of the management is only money making. We
humbly request you to give necessary directions to the management to provide
sufficient facilities to the students, issue proper receipts to the payments, and
refund the caution money of RUPEES 2000 per hand at the earliest”.
The committee considered the matter and advised Southern Regional
Office to write to the concerned University and request to get this
complaint from the B.Ed students of ,Jaybees Training College of B.Ed,
Kuttor, Mathamangalam, Kannur, Kerala enquired into and send the factual
report to SRCNCTE.
Volume-06
Consideration of Inspection u/s-14
80
SRCAPP669
D.El.Ed
Sarvodaya
College of
Teacher
Education,
Srikakulam
District
AP
Sarvodaya College of Teacher Education, K.No. 369-6B, 369-6, Plot No. 1 & 2,
Ijjavaram Village, Naupada R.S. Post, Santhabommali Taluk, Srikakulam
District-532212,
Andhra Pradesh
Pedada Bhima Rao Memorial Educational Society, Plot No. 1-477/1, N.G Line
Street, Pathanaupada Village, Naupada R.S. Post, Tekkali Taluk, Naupada Rs.
Town, Srikakulam District-532212, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of
recognition to Sarvodaya College of Teacher Education, K.No. 369-6B, 369-6,
Plot No. 1&2, Ijjavaram Village, Naupada R.S. Post, Santhabommali Taluka,
Srikakulam District-532212, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course for two years
duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE online on 24.09.2011. The institution has submitted hard copy
of the application on 29.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 08.11.2011. A reminder letter to the State
Government was sent on 03.01.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the
institution on 27.12.2011.
The institution has replied to the deficiency letter on 09.03.2012, which is after 60
days. Institution has stated that the deficiency letter is received by them on
17.01.2012.
“As per sub-clause (1) of clause 7 of NCTE Regulation 2009, the
applicant institution is required to submit deficiencies to the SRC
office within 60 days from the date of receipt of communication of
deficiencies, failing which the application will be treated as rejected
and closed, no extension to time will be granted and any submissions
received after 60 days will be treated as invalid and not entertained.”
The SRC in its 221st meeting held on 19th-20th April 2012, considered the reply of
the institution, which is received on 09/3/2012, i.e., after 74 (Seventy four) days
from the date of issue of deficiency letter and with reference to the totality of
information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee
177
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
decided as per clause 7(1) of NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the
application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution
F.No.SRCAPP669/D.El.Ed/AP/2012-13/41829 dated 30.05.2012.
vide
no.
The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority
vide order no. F.No. 89-285/2012 Appeal/8 th Meeting- 2012 dated 05.09.2012
has stated as follows:
“the Council concluded that there was adequate ground to remand
the case to the SRC with a direction to process the applications
and to take the further decision thereafter.
The council hereby remands back the case of Sarvodaya College of
Teacher Education, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE,
for necessary action as indicated above.”
The matter was placed before SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th-28th
September 2012, and the committee considered the matter and decided to
process.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 20th – 21st November 2012, considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 05/09/2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of
NCTE Act, for the following:




In the building plan submitted, Sy No. 369-6 is not mentioned.
The institution has submitted two building plans one at the time of
initial application and another in reply to deficiency letter, both the
building plans are not matching/different.
As per building completion certificate, the total built up area is
9094.42 sq.ft only, which is less than the requirement of 16000 sq.ft.
as per NCTE norms. The built up area shown in building completion
certificate is not matching with building plan.
Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund
from a Nationalised Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name
is not given.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 14.12.2012 and
the institution has submitted its representation dated 26.12.2012 received in the
office of SRC on 26.12.2012.
The SRC in its 239th meeting held on 26th-27th February 2013, considered the reply
of the institution dt.26-12-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to
cause inspection under section 14 of NCTE Act, to examine whether the
institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified
by the institution, as per the norms.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 18th -22th March 2013. The
same was intimated to institution on 14.03.2013.
178
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The inspection of the institution was conducted on 20.03.2013. The VT report was
received by SRC on 25.03.2013.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the
institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of
NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to
time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of
Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an
annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit), subject to the appointment of
qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the
Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect
before the commencement of the academic session.
81
SRCAPP1099
D.El.Ed
Siddhu
College of
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
Siddhu College of Education D.Ed., Plot/Khasara No. 207, Ward No.1,
Huzurnagar Village and Post, Huzurnagar City and Taluk, Nalgonda District 508204, Andhra Pradesh
Siddhu Educational Society, Near Public Club, Huzurnagar Village and Post,
Huzurnagar City and Taluk, Nalgonda District-508204 Andhra Pradesh had
applied for grant of recognition to Siddhu College of Education D.Ed.,
Plot/Khasara No. 207, Ward No.1, Huzurnagar Village and Post, Huzurnagar
City and Taluk, Nalgonda District - 508204, Andhra Pradesh for D.E.C.Ed
Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical copy
received on 30.09.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 03.11.2011/ 14.12.2011. A deficiency letter
was issued to the institution on 29.12.2011. The institution has replied to the
deficiency letter on 24.02.12
The SRC in its 220th Meeting of SRC held on 30th – 31st March, 2012 considered
the reply of the institution dt. 24.02.2102 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of
NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 26.04.2012.
The institution has submitted its written representation on 16.05.2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered by SRC
in its 223rd meeting held in 29th-31st May 2012, the reply is unconvincing and not
satisfactory, and deficiencies still persist as under:

Certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is not submitted.
Land is not registered in the name of the Society/institution on the date of
on-line application. The institution has submitted sale deed dt. 18.02.2011
subsequent to the date of application, which is not permissible as per
NCTE regulations 2009. The land should be registered on or before online application as stipulated in the regulations.

The course applied by the institution is for D.E.C.Ed, whereas the name of
the institution is read as ‘Sindhu College of Education D.Ed’. Change of
179
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
course from D.E.C.Ed to D.El.Ed is not permissible as per Regulations at a
later date.

Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion of
land from agricultural to educational purposes.

Proof of completion of 3 academic sessions for B.Ed course being run by
the intuition is not submitted.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected
& based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE
Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.E.C.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution vide no. F.No.
SRCAPP1099 (2012-13)/D.E.C.Ed/AP/2011-12/43298 dated 29.06.2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE H.Qtrs and the appellate authority order, in its order stated as follows:After Perusal of the documents, memorandum of appeal,
affidavit, and after considering the oral arguments advanced during
the hearing, the council concluded that there was adequate ground to
remand the case to the SRC for processing of the application for
D.El.Ed course as per Regulations.
The SRC in its 235th meeting held on 20th-21st October 2012, considered the
Appellate authority order dt. 10.10.2012 and all the relevant documentary
evidences and it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under NCTE Act, for
the following:

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is
not submitted.
 Notarized English version of the certified copy of land documents
not submitted.
 The institution has not submitted proceedings of Revenue
Divisional Officer for conversion of land from agricultural to nonagricultural and educational purposes.
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 20.12.2012. The
institution has submitted its reply on 26.12.2012.
The SRC in its 239th meeting held on 26th-27th February 2013, considered the reply
of the institution dt.26-12-2012 and all other relevant documents and decided to
cause inspection under section 14 of NCTE Act, to examine whether the
institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified
by the institution, as per the norms.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 18th -22th March 2013. The
same was intimated to the institution on 14.03.2013.
180
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The inspection was conducted on 21.03.2013. The VT report was received by
SRC on 25.03.2013.
On careful perusal of the original file of the institution, reply of the
institution, all relevant documents and other related documents, Act of
NCTE, 1993, Regulations and guidelines of NCTE published from time to
time laid on the table, the Regional Committee decided to issue Letter of
Intent for grant of recognition to D.El.Ed course of two year duration with an
annual intake of 50(Fifty only)(one unit), subject to the appointment of
qualified staff through duly constituted selection committee as per the
Norms of NCTE/State Government/Affiliating University and be given effect
before the commencement of the academic session.
82
SRCAPP1255
D.El.Ed
Sri Nagoji
Rao Diploma
in Elementary
Educational
Institution,
Mahabubnag
ar District
AP
Sri. Nagoji Rao Diploma in Elementary Educational Institution, Khasara No.319/E,
319/Vu, 318/1, 318/2, 321/1, Plot No.2247, Street No.10, Appananpally Village, Edira
Town, Mahabubnagar Taluk, Mahabubnagar District-509002, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Nagoji Rao Memorial Sharada Oriental Educational Society, Plot No.1-10-52,
Shasaheb Gutta Street, Mahabubnagar Village, Mahabubnagar Taluk, Mahabubnagar
District-509001, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sri.Nagoji Rao
Diploma in Elementary Educational Institution, Khasara No.319/E, 319/Vu, 318/1,
318/2, 321/1, Plot No. 2247, Street No.10, Appananpally Village, Edira Town,
Mahabubnagar Taluk, Mahabubnagar District-509002, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed
Course of Two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern
Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical application has been
received in the office of SRC on 04.10.2011.
The Application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State Government
for recommendation on 28.10.2011/22.12.2011 (Reminder). A deficiency letter was issued
to the institution on 29.12.2011.
The institution replied to the deficiency letter on 05.03.2012.
The SRC in its 19th – 20th April 2012, considered the reply of the institution
dated 05.03.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14(1) of NCTE Act, for the
following:
1) In the approved building plan copy submitted, total earmarked built up area for the
proposed course is not mentioned. Building plan submitted is in favour of the
Society not in favour of proposed College.
2) Land usage certificate for Sy.Nos. 318/1, 2, 321/1AA & 2AA is not submitted.
3) Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a
Nationalised Bank in favour of Socoety/college/institution name if not given.
4) Encumbrance certificate submitted is mortgaged, which is not permissible as per
NCTE Regulations 2009.
5) Details of other teacher educational programmes run by the institution in the same
building/premises is not given.
Accordingly, a Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on
09.06.2012 The institution has submitted its written representation on
15.06.2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered in 226th
Meeting of SRC held on 9th and 10th July 2012 and the reply is unconvincing and
181
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

On the date of on line application submission the land is mortgaged to a
Bank, which is not permissible as per NCTE norms.
“As per Regulations 8 (7) (i) “No institution shall be granted recognition
under these Regulations unless the institution or society sponsoring the
institution is in possession of required land on the date of application. The
land free from all encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on
lease from Government or Government institutions for a period of not less
than 30 years. In cases where under relevant State or Union Territory laws
the maximum permissible lease period is less than 30 years, the State
Government or Union Territory Administration law shall prevail. However, no
building shall be taken on lease for running any teacher training course.”
The reply to the show cause notice was not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected
& based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided as per NCTE
Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the institution for
recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 27.08.2012.
Aggrieved by the rejection order of SRC, the institution approached the appellate
authority.
The NCTE H’qrs vide order no. F.No89-495/2012 Appeal/9th Meeting-2012 dated
09.10.2012 decided to remand back the case to SRC for further processing.
The SRC in its 235 th meeting held on 21-22nd November, 2012 considered the
appellate authority order dated 09/10/2012 and decided to further process the
application of the said institution.
The SRC in its 237th Meeting held on 5th – 6th January 2013 considered the
Appellate authority order dated 09.10.2012 and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, to examine
whether the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the
proposed programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were
duly rectified by the institution, as per the norms.
Accordingly, an inspection intimation letter was sent to the institution on14/03/2013
and the inspection of the institution was conducted on 18/03/2013.
The Committee considered the VT report, VCD and other relevant documents
of the institution, found that the deficiencies still persist as under:

BCC submitted is not approved by Government Engineer. Two BCCs
submitted in the same date. One reflects G.F ,F.F and the other reflects
G.F.F.F.and S.F.Sy.No.s do not match with that of the one in building
plan.

Sy.No. 319/O mentioned in the BCC is not reflected in the LUC.To be
182
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
clarified by the Institution.

Sy.Nos 319/EE,319/VU ,321/1/AA,2/AA in the land document is not
reflected in the EC.

Sy.Nos in the BCC ,Building plan do not match with that of
proceedings of the Revenue Department.To clarify.


Labs are not reflected in the building plan submitted.Multipurpose hall is
not shown in the B.P.
Not known in which Sy.No. the institution is running.

FDRs of Rs. 5 lakhs and Rs.3 lakhs have expired on 28/092/2012.
the
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided
as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the
institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
Volume-07
Consideration of Other Items
83
APS01809
D.Ed
Vidya Vikas
D.Ed College,
Gulbarga
District
KA
Vidya Vikas D.Ed College,Millath Nagar,Ring Road, Gulbarga- 585104
Tippu Sultan Shaheed Educational Trust,Gulbarga,Karnataka had submitted
an application to the Southern Regional Committee,NCTE for grant of recognition
to Vidya Vikas D.Ed College, Millath Nagar,Ring Road, Gulbarga- 585104 for
Elementary (D.Ed) course of two and half years duration from the academic
session 2004-2005 with an annual intake of 50 students and recognition was
granted to the institution from the academic session 2004-2005 vide this office
letter No. F.SRO/NCTE/D.Ed/2004-2005/8808 dated 29/11/2004 with the condition
to shift to its own premises/building within three years from the date of recognition.
It was observed from the file that the institution had submitted a DD of Rs.40,000/towards inspection along with information pertaining to the permanent building
which has been taken into account on 25.10.2007 .No further action is seen in the
file.
Further, a copy of the letter from Tippu Sulthan Shaheed Educational Trust dated
01/08/2012 addressed to the Principal,District Institute for Education and
Training,Kamalapur,Gulbarga District requesting not to send any CAC candidates
of 1st year D.Ed course to Vidya Vikas D.Ed College,Gulbarga for the academic
year 2012-13 is received by this office on 06/08/2012.
Hence, a letter was addressed to the institution seeking information regarding the
intention of the institution for offering D.Ed course in the college vide this office
letter No. F.SRO/APSO 1809/KA/2012/49087 dated 13.02.2013.
183
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Further, the institution has submitted representation on 28/02/2013 , which is as
under;
“As per the resolution passed by the management of Tipu Sultan Educational
Trust,Gulbarga (Copy enclosed),the management has decided to close down the
Vidya Vikas D.Ed College,Gulbarga after the final year examination of D.Ed II year
students. As such the institution will not run hereafter.”
Another letter is received by this office on 19/03/2013 from the Secretary,Tipu
Sultan Shaheed Educational Trust,Gulbarga with a request for withdrawal of FDRs
held in joint account for payment of staff of Vidya Vikas D.Ed College from
January 2013 to June 2013.
The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.Ed
course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for
(APS01809) D.Ed course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final
year course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
84
APS01907
D.Ed
Shekar
Institute of
Education,
Bangalore
KA
Shekar Institute of Education,81,Bull Temple Road, Bangalore – 560
019,KarnatakaShekar Institute of
Education, 81, Bull Temple Road,
Bangalore – 560 019, Karnataka was granted recognition for D.Ed course of
two and half years from the academic session 2004-2005 with an annual
intake of 50 students.
Now, the President,Sri Venkateshwara Education Society has submitted a written
representation received by this office on 28/03/2013 which states as under :“
I
wish
to
state
that
Shekar
D.Ed
College,
No.
53/2,H.D.Halli,C.K.Palya,Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore – 560 083, is a
recognized institution and recognition was given by NCTE, and Govt. of Karnataka
(APS0 1907).During the year 2011-2012 admission are not made due to shortage
of students and we have closed the institution. Hence, I request you to kindly derecognize our institution with immediate effect also request you to refund the
endowment which was deposited in the Joint Account of Regional Director and
the Secretary of the Institution. The no objection issued by the D.I.E.T, Bangalore
District, is here with enclosed. Our Institution has not made any admission since
three years.”
The institution has submitted a letter dated 22.03.2013 from Principal, D.I.E.T,
Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Bangalore Urban stating that the institution has not
submitted the admission details for approval for the academic session 2011-12
and 2012-13 and I year and II Year D.Ed Classes are not conducted during these
years.
184
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.Ed
course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for
(APS01907) D.Ed course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final
year course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
85
APS02099
D.Ed
RCNC
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Bangalore
Rural District
KA
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
RCNC Teacher Training Institute, No.649, Sunkalpet, Hoskote Town,
Bangalore Rural District, Pin – 562114, Karnataka.
RCNC Teacher Training Institute, No.649, Sunkalpet, Hoskote Town, Bangalore
Rural District, Pin – 562114, Karnataka had submitted an application for grant of
recognition on 31.12.2003. The institution was granted recognition for offering
D.Ed course with an intake of 50 students on 25.11.2004.
Recognition was granted for D.Ed –A.I(APSO 4851) with an intake of 50 students
from the session 2006-2007 vide order dated 27.07.2007
The institution vide letter dated 15.07.2010 had stated that “the strength of
students were decreased drastically and in the last academic year 2009-2010 no
student has been admitted to English Medium and there are only 7 students in the
2nd year and their academic year has come to an end and the management has
taken a decision to close down the institution. Hence, as per the decision of the
management, the institution has requested to withdraw the recognition granted to
the institution.
Further, the institution had requested to withdraw the amount towards Endowment
Fund of Rs.5.00 lakhs and Reserve fund of Rs.3.00 lakhs kept in the joint
account.”
The matter was placed before SRC and the SRC in its 195th Meeting held on 21st
to 22nd August 2010, considered the matter and decided that the institution be
informed that if basic unit is closed, the additional unit cannot be continued and
may also face closure.
In the mean time ,NCTE,Hqrs vide its letter dated 27.08.2010 had forwarded a
copy of the inspection report dated 20.04.2010 conducted under section 13 of the
NCTE Act. As there were deficiencies pointed out in the inspection report and had
requested SRC to initiate action against the institution under section 17 of the
NCTE Act immediately.
The SRC in its 196th Meeting held on 15th – 16th September 2010 considered the
deficiencies pointed out by the inspection team and decided that the basic unit with
whatever medium be continued and additional unit bearing code no. APSO 4581
185
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
be withdrawn. Accordingly, a withdrawal order was issued to the institution (APSO
4581) on 29/10/2010.
Now, the Managing Trustee of R.C.N.C Education Trust has submitted
representation on 21/03/2013 requesting as under;
“ We were running RCNC D.Ed College with two units ( APSO 2099 and APSO
4851).In this regard we had deposited two fixed bonds of Rs. 5 lac Each as
reserve fund jointly with you.The details of the Reserve Fund is as follows ;
1.No. TDA/59 315073 dated 29/12/2003 for an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- ,of
S.B.I.,Hosakote
2.No. TDA/59 315168 dated 15/09/2006 for an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- of
S.B.I.Hosakote
Later the permission of our D.Ed –A.I was withdrawn by the Regional
Director,NCTE,SRC on 29.10.2010 due to lack of staff.
And now ,we the management have decided to close the existing D.Ed (APSO
2099) for the academic year 2012-2013.Regarding this we have passed a
resolution and its copy is enclosed for your consideration.
We have also submitted applications to the Director, DSERT,Bangalore, through
the Principal,Bangalore Rural DIET on 22/09/2012,stating that we are closing
D.Ed(copies are enclosed).
Therefore, I request your kind permission to withdraw the Reserve Fund amounts
of our two D.Ed units.”
The institution has submitted original FDRs, No- due certificates from the staff
members, and a letter from D.S.E.R.T stating that no admissions were made in the
year 2011-2012.
The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.Ed
course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for
(APS02099) D.Ed course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final
year course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
86
APS03470
B.Ed
TMAE
College of
Education,
Davanagere
District
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
TMAE College of Education, Harappanahalli – 583131,Davanagere District,
Karnataka
TMAE College of Education, Harappanahalli – 583131,Davanagere District,
Karnataka was granted recognition for B.Ed Course of one year from the academic
session 2000-2001 with an annual intake of 100 students subject to certain
conditions.
186
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
KA
Now, the Secretary,T.M.A.E.Society,Harappanahalli has submitted a request on
28.02.2013 for change of name of the College which is as under ;
“T.M.A.E Society,Harappanahalli, has been running T.M.A.E.S College of
Education since 1973-74.Shri. Katti Sethuramacharya , one of the honourable
citizens of the city has rendered commendable service to our institution. Hence,
our Society in its yearly meeting of 2010-2011 has decided to rename the college
as Shri Katti Sethuramacharya College of Education in his honour.Minutes of the
meeting is attached.
It is important to rename the college as he has served as the Director of the
Institution for a long time. He is an unforgettable and prominent personality of the
town. The Society is able to run many institutions because of his experience and
able leadership.
I request you to rename the college as T.M.A.E.S.Shri Katti Sethuramacharya
College of Education,Harapanahalli,Davangere.”
87
SRCAPP1138
B.El.Ed
Rayan
College of
Education,
Nalgonda
District
AP
The committee considered the matter and decided that change of name of
the “TMAE College of Education”, Harappanahalli – 583131, Davanagere
District, Karnataka to “T.M.A.E.S. Shri Katti Sethuramacharya College of
Education”, Harapanahalli, Davanagere, Karnataka is permitted subject to
the remittance of Rs. 50,000/- as per the NCTE Act towards inspection fee
and also subject to no change in the location of the institution,
Structure/Nature of management and other usual conditions..
Rayan College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 112, Venkatadripalem Village,
Miryalguda Post and Taluk, Nalgonda District – 508207, Andhra Pradesh
MD Rayanahamed Educational Society, Plot No. 12-160, Seetharampuram
Road, Miryalguda Village and Post, Miryalguda City and Taluk, Nalgonda
District – 508207, Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Rayan
College of Education, Plot/Khasara No. 112, Venkatadripalem Village,
Miryalguda Post and Taluk, Nalgonda District – 508207, Andhra Pradesh for
B.El.Ed course of four years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993
to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 29.09.2011 and physical
copy received on 05.10.2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 18.10.2011/22.12.2011. A deficiency letter
was issued to the institution on 30.12.2011. The institution has replied to the
deficiency letter on 24.02.2012.
The SRC in its 220th meeting held on 30th –31st March 2012 considered the reply of
the institution dt.24.02.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was
decided to serve Show Cause Notice.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 27.04.2012. The
institution submitted its written representation on 24.04.2012.
The SRC in its 222nd meeting held on 09th – 10th May 2012 considered the reply of
the institution vide letter dt.24.04.2012 and all the relevant documentary evidences
187
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
and it was decided to serve Show Cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, Show Cause Notice was issued to the institution on 11.06.2012. The
institution submitted its written representation on 12.06.2012.
The reply of the institution to the show cause notice was duly considered and the
reply is unconvincing and not satisfactory, deficiencies still persist as under:

The institution has registered the land on 25.11.2011, which is after
making of the on-line application, which is not permissible as per
NCTE Regulations 2009. The institution in its reply dt.12.06.2012
states that land could not be registered due to agitation in the State of
Andhra Pradesh.
The reply to the show cause notice is not satisfactory and unconvincing.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information collected
& based on a collective application of mind, the SRC in its 225th meeting held on
25th – 26th June 2012 decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject
the application of the institution for recognition of B.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, rejection order was issued to the institution on 23.07.2012.
The institution preferred an appeal to NCTE, Hqrs and the Appellate Authority
vide order no. F.No. 89-400/2012 Appeal/9 th Meeting- 2012 has stated as
follows:
“after perusal of documents, memorandum of appeal, affidavit and after
considering oral arguments advanced during the hearing, the Council
concluded that there was adequate ground to remand the case to the SRC
with a direction to process the application and to take further decision
thereafter.
Now therefore, the Council hereby remands back the case of Rayan
College of Education, Nalgonda, Andhra Pradesh to the SRC, NCTE, for
necessary action as indicated above”.
In obedience to the Appellate authority order dated 23.10.2012, the SRC in its
235th meeting held on 21st –22nd November 2012 decided to process the
application.
Accordingly, the application is being processed and placed before SRC in its 240th
meeting held on 9th-11th March 2013.
The SRC in its 240th meeting held on 9th-11th March 2013 considered the matter
and decided to cause inspection.
In the meantime, the institution has submitted written representation on
07.03.2013 (already submitted its written representation to SRC NCTE dt.
17.10.2012 & 19.11.2012) regarding process of application and change of course
from B.El.Ed to D.El.Ed course due to prevailed conditions mentioned below:-
188
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013



No Educational society/agency is offering B.El.Ed course in A.P.
There are no faculty members/department in the university concerned to
us.
No entrance test is being conducted for B.El.Ed course in our Andhra
Pradesh State.
Again, the institution has submitted its written representation on 19.03.2013
(requisition for change of course B.El.Ed to D.El.Ed and cause inspection)
Note: So far SRC-NCTE has not granted recognition for B.El.Ed course i.e. four
year integrated course. As per the request of the institution at this juncture, the
change of course is not permissible as per NCTE Regulation.
But SRC in its 240th meeting held on 9th-11th March 2013 decided to Cause
Inspection.
The application of the said Society bearing SRCAPP1138-B.El.Ed course is
being processed as per the direction of Appellate authority order and in 240th
SRC meeting held on 9-11th March, 2013, decided to cause inspection of the
institution for B.El.Ed course. In the meanwhile the institution has submitted
written representation vide letter dt. 19/03/2013 for change of course from
B.El.Ed, which was applied on-line, to D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, the committee duly considered the written representation of the
institution vide letter dt. 19-03-2013 and decided that, as per NCTE
Regulations 2009, change of course other than the one applied on-line is not
permissible at a later date. Only on-line course is to be considered.
Therefore, request of the institution for change of course is rejected. In the
circumstances, the application abates. Southern Regional Committee
decided to close the case.
88
APS08947
B.Ed
Sri
Venkateshwar
a College of
Education,
Prakasam
District
AP
Sri Venkateshwara College of Education, Darsi Village, Addanki Road, Darsi
Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Venkateshwara College of Education, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh
submitted application for granted of recognition to B.Ed course on 13/08/2007.
The application was processed and recognition was granted for offering B.Ed
course with an intake of 100 students on 23/10/2007 at Darsi Village, Addanki
Road, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh with the condition to shift
to own premises within 3 years.
The institution has submitted its written representation alongwith DD of Rs.50000/stating as follows:
“our institution Sri Venkateshwara College of Education (B.Ed) was sanctioning at
the address:- Darsi Village, Addanki Road, Darsi Mandal, Prakasam District,
Andhra Pradesh the college was functioning in the 30 years lease premises.
189
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Now our management has purchased own land and has constructed new building
for the purpose of B.Ed college, hence we propose to shift the college to new
premises address; podili Road, Rajampalli Village & Post, Darisi Mandal,
Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh the distance between old campus to new
campus is 05 K.M. only.
In this regard we are hereby submitting formal application along with documents
and D.D for Rs. 50.000/- bearing No. 041856 dated 21/03/2013 seeking
permission from SRC for shifting our Sri Venkateshwara College of Education
(B.Ed) to new and own campus”.
As per 2007 regulation Para 8 (7) sub para stated as follows:
“No institution shall be granted recognition under these regulations unless it is in
possession of required land on the date of application The land free from all
encumbrances could be either on ownership basis or on lease from
Government/Govt. Institutions for a period of not less than 30 years.
In the affidavit (at page No. 35) it is mentioned as 30 years lease and as per land
documets it mentioned as lease for 30 years and the building is also lease basis (it
is a private lease and not as Govt. lease).
In V.T. Report also it is mentioned as lease only.
As per recognition order dt. 23/01/2007 not mentioned that within three years the
institution to e shift to the new building. The formal order issued is as per
regulations 2007.
The Committee considered the matter and advised Southern Regional Office
to process further and put up the case in the next SRC meeting.
89
APS04953
D.T.Ed
M.S. Teacher
Training
Institute,
Namakkal
District
TN
M.S. Teacher Training Institute, Marappanacikan Patty, Ernapuram Post,
Namakkal District, Tamilnadu
M.S. Teacher Training Institute, Marappanacikan Patty, Ernapuram Post,
Namakkal District, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for D.T.Ed
Course on 29.12.2005. The institution was granted recognition on 03.02.2007
with an annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises
within 3 years.
The institution vide its letter dtd. 04.02.2013 has stated that "M.S. Teacher
Training Institute, CMS Nagar, Ernapuram, Namakkal was started in the year as
per APSO4953 F.SRO/NCTE/D.T.ED/2006- 07/10529 dated 03.02.2007.
Students were admitted during the Academic year 2007 with an intake of 50
students. Admission was stopped from the year 2011 onwards and
information about the stoppage of admission of students in the D.T.Ed
course was intimated to the Principal DIET, Namakkal on 08.07.2011. We had
not informed about the non admission of students in the D.T.Ed course to NCTE
Bangalore at that time.
Since we had stopped the admission to the D.T.Ed course from the year
2008 onwards, we request you to withdraw the recognition to M S Teacher
Training Institute, CMS Nagar, Ernapurarn, Namakkal and cancellation order may
kindly be sent to our college. This letter is submitted to you for your consideration
190
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
and perusal".
The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed
course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for
D.T.Ed (APS04953) course with effect from 2012-2013, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final
year course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
90
APS01105
D.T.Ed
T.E.S.
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Vellore
District
TN
T.E.S.Teacher Training Institute, Jayapuram Village and Post, Tirupattur
Taluk, Vellore District, Pin-635651, Tamilnadu
T.E.S. Teacher Training Institute, Jayapuram Village and Post, Tirupattur Taluk,
Vellore District- 635651, Tamilnadu had submitted an application for D.T.Ed
Course on 31.12.2002. The institution was granted recognition on 27.04.2006 with
an annual intake of 50 students, with the condition to shift to own premises within 3
years.
The institution vide its letter dtd. 20.02.2013 has stated that "TES Teacher Training
Institute run by TES Educational Trust has decided to close the D.T.Ed course
(APS01105) with effect from 20.12.2013 due to poor admission in our state of
Tamilnadu.
In this regard, we kindly request you to permit the closure by withdrawing
the recognition for D.T.Ed course (APS01105) with effect from 2012-2013.
Further, we request you to return the Endowment Funds and Reserve
Funds deposited with SRC, NCTE, Bangalore at the earliest".
The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed
course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for
(APS01105) D.T.Ed course with effect from 2012-2013, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final
year course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
91
APS03535
D.T.Ed
Immaculate
Teacher
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Immaculate
Teacher
Training
Institute,
Idhaya
Nagar,
Melaputhamangalam,
Thirunallur,
Karaikal,
Pondicherry-609607,
Pondicherry
191
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Training
Institute,
Pondicherry
PU
Immaculate Teacher Training Institute, ldhaya Nagar, Melaputhamangalam,
Thirunallur, Karaikal, Pondicherry-609607, Pondicherry had submitted an
application for D.T.Ed Course on 03.02.2004. The institution was granted
recognition on 17.12.2004 with an annual intake of 50 students, with the
condition to shift to own premises within 3 years.
The institution vide its letter dtd. 04.02.2013 has stated that "we w ould
like to bring to your kind attention that as per our previous letter dated
11 th June 2012. The enrollment of students is going down progressively
for this program. At present we have 19 students in second year. Hence
after their final exam we are winding up this course in this Immaculate Teacher
Training Institute, Karaikal.
“We thank you very much for the assistance and guidance which we
have cherished all these years".
The Committee considered the Institutions request for closure of D.T.Ed
course and decided to permit the closure by withdrawing the recognition for
(APS03535) D.T.Ed course with effect from 2013-2014, in order to enable the
ongoing batch of students in D.T.Ed, course, if any, to complete their final
year course.
But it is made clear that the institution is debarred from making any further
admission subsequent to the date of issue of this order.
The Affiliating body / Examining board / body be informed accordingly.
92
APS01401
D.El.Ed
Sree
Venkateshwar
a Teacher
Training
Institute,
Chittoor
District
AP
Further decided to return Endowment funds and Reserve fund deposited
with SRC NCTE, Bangalore, if any.
Sree Venkateswara Teacher Training Institute, K.No. 74, P.No. 6-105, Street
No. 1-80, Karvetinagaram Village, Post, Karvetinagaram Taluk, Chittoor
District-517582, Andhra Pradesh.
Sri Venkateswara Educational Society, P.No. 1-88, West Street, Karvetinagaram
Village, and Post, Karventinagaram Taluk, and City, Chittoor District-517582,
Andhra Pradesh had applied for grant of recognition to Sree Venkateswara
Teacher Training Institute, K.No. 74, P.No. 6-105, Street No. 1-80, Karvetinagaram
Village, Post, Karvetinagaram Taluk, Chittoor District-517582, Andhra Pradesh for
D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section 14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993
to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online on 30/09/2011 and physical
application has been received in the office of SRC on 03/10/2011.
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 18/10/2011 followed by reminder on
14/12/2011. A deficiency letter was issued to the institution on 29/12/2011. The
institution has submitted written representation to the deficiency letter on
15/02/2012.
The SRC in its 218th meeting held on 28th February, 2012 considered the reply of
the intuition vide letter dt. 15.02.2012 and the relevant documentary evidences and
192
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
it was decided to serve Show cause Notice under Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26.03.2012. The
institution has submitted written representation on 13/04/2012.
The SRC in its 222nd Meeting held on 09th-10th May, 2012 considered the written
reply of the institution vide letter dt.13/04/2012 and other relevant documents and
decided to cause inspection to examine whether the institution fulfils all the
requirements as per the norms, for the proposed programme, subject to the
condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified by the institution, under
Section 14 (1) of NCTE Act.
Accordingly, inspection of the institution was fixed between 01st-05th June 2012
the same was intimated to the institution on 25/05/2012.
“A letter has been received from VT members Dr. T. Krishnammal and K.S. Murali
Krishna has informed that Sri Venkateswara Teacher Training Institute,
Karvetinagaram, Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh was inspected by both of us on
21/06/2012.
The following points are being brought to your kind notice.



Families were found in the building.
there is no Principal and office room to take care of D.El.Ed course.
there is no infrastructure instructional facilities such as classroom,
Multipurpose hall, Seminar hall, Laboratory, Play Ground, Educational
Technology Lab, Psychology Lab and Library etc…
The above mentioned points clearly indicate that the building resembles a dwelling
place than a college meant for D.EL.Ed course”.
The SRC in its 233rd meeting held on 26th and 28th September, 2012 considered
the VT repot, VCD and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided
to serve Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

As per VT report, Families were found in the building.

As per VT report, there is not Principal and office room to take care of D.El.Ed
course and administration of the institution.

As per VT report, There is not infrastructural and instructional facilities such as
class rooms, Multipurpose hall, Seminar hall, Laboratory, Play Ground,
Educational Technology Lab, Psychology lab and Library etc., as required to
conduct the teacher educational programmes.

The above mentioned points clearly indicate that the building resembles a
dwelling place than a college meant for D.El.Ed course.
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 1.11.2012.
The institution has not submitted reply for show cause notice so far(checked in the
193
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
inward diary also).
The institution has not submitted reply for Show Cause Notice even after the
expiry of stipulated time of 21 days from the date of receipt of the notice.
Keeping in view, Supreme Court vide their order in Civil Appeal No. 11251128/2011 in SLP No. 17165-68/2009 filed by NCTE Vs ors, which reads as
under:
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the
conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule
fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and
communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered
to”.
The committee considered the non-reply of the institution to the issue of
show cause notice dt. 01-11-2012 and with reference to the totality of
information collected & based on a collective application of mind, the
committee decided as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the
application of the institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
93
APS04346
M.Ed-AI
Department of
Education,
Banglaore
University,
Bangalore
KA
Department of Education, Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi, Bangalore560056, Karnataka.
Department of Education, Bangalore University, Jnana Bharathi, Bangalore560056, Karnataka was granted recognition for M.Ed course of one year duration
from the academic session 2000-2001 vide order F.KR/M.Ed/12/SRO/NCTE/2002001/676 dated on 4.7.2000 with an annual intake of 35 students.
A complaint was received on 11/12/12 from T.V. Nataraj. #11, 3rd main,
Ranganathpura, Kamakshipalya, Bangalore 560079 regarding initiating action on
Bangalore University Department of Post-Graduation in Education under the
provision of section 17 of the NCTE Act.
The SRC considered the compliant matter in its 241st meeting held on 29th and
31st March 2013 and April 2013 and decided to close the matter ( anonymous
letter).
Now, another complaint has been received on 13/03/2013 from
Prof.K.V.Acharya,Former Professor and Chairman Electronic Science, President,
Bharatiya Shikshana Mandala,Syndicate Member, Bangalore University,
Bangalore – 560 056 which is as under ;
“With a view to bring –in quality education in Teacher Education, Bangalore
University has taken several steps. Recently a Committee that was appointed by
the previous Vice Chancellor recommended shifting the admission of M.Ed
Students to PG Department, Bangalore University, Bangalore.
However, this has resulted in excess admission to the tune of 140 or so. I have
advised the administration to check up the matter with you. But the students have
represented that the permitted number is only 35.The relevant documents are
194
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
enclosed herewith.
I request you to clarify whether any irregularity by the University has been done.
This is very important because we are strictly enforcing NCTE condition on the
affiliated colleges.”
Copies of the following are submitted along with this letter
1.
2.
A request letter of the Bangalore University dated 28.07.2000 for
increase in intake of students for M.Ed course.
NCTE letter to the Bangalore University dated 24.08.2000 in
response to the
request.
3.
A copy of the written representation from students through
Vidhyarthi Hitha Rakshana Samithi,Banaglore
4. A copy of the information given under RTI by this office regarding
the intake in
M.Ed course of Bangalore University.
5. No of candidates admitted to M.Ed course along with their names
and faculty list of
Bangalore University working in the Department of Post Graduation
in Education
(M.Ed).
News Paper Clipping dated 12.12.2013,highlighting the problems with respect to
future of students admitted for M.ED course at Bangalore University
94
APS08611
M.Ed
PET Post
Graduate
Center for
Education and
Research
(M.Ed),
Mandya
District
KA
The Committee considered the complaint letter dt. 12/03/2013 received in
this office regarding excess admission of the M.Ed students in the PG
department of education Bangalore University, Jnanabharathi Campus. The
Committee decided and advised Southern Regional Office to write to the
University, requesting for facts regarding excess admissions.
PET Post Graduate Center for Education and Research (M.Ed),Shankara
Gowda College of Education, Mandya 571401,Karnataka
PET Post Graduate Center for Education and Research (M.Ed),Shankara
Gowda College of Education, Mandya 571401,Karnataka had applied for grant
of recognition to M.Ed course of one year duration on 09.04.2007.
The application was scrutinized as per NCTE regulations 2005 and a deficiency
letter was issued to the institution on 11/05/2007..The institution submitted a
written representation on 06/06/2007.
Inspection of the institution was carried out on 28.06.2007. The SRC in its 140th
meeting held on 18th – 20th August, 2007 considered the inspection report and all
relevant documents and decided to grant conditional recognition to the institution.
Accordingly , a Letter of Intent was issued to the institution on 23/08/2007 in the
name of PET Post Graduate Centre for Education and Research Shankara
Gowda College of Education, PES Engineering College Campus, Mandya
571401,Karnataka.
The institution submitted its compliance report on 08/08/2007 along with the
affidavit, individual affidavit by staff members and approved list from the Registrar,
195
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
University of Mysore,Karnataka.
SRC in its 131st meeting of SRC held on 10th – 11th April 2007 had decided to
authorize the Regional Director to issue un-conditional recognition order to such
institutions who submit the documents as per 7(11) of NCTE Regulations i.e
Affidavit by the Management regarding appointment of staff in Rs.100/- stamp
paper in the prescribed format,Affidavit in Rs.10/- from the individual staff
members in the prescribed format and staff profile along with approval by the
concerned affiliating body like University ,SCERT,DTERT,DSERT etc as
applicable.
In view of the above decision of SRC, recognition was granted for PET Post
Graduate Centre for Education and Research,Shankara College of
Education,Mandya – 571401,Karnataka for conducting M.Ed course of one year
duration with an annual intake of 25 students on 13.01.2006.
Enhancement of intake from 25 to 35 students was permitted vide this office order
No. F.SRO/NCTE/2010-2011/20634 dated 28.08.2010.
On 25/03/2013, a letter is received from the Principal ,Shankar Gowda College of
Education,Mandya with a request for corrigendum in NCTE Certificate of
Recognition of M.Ed course which is as under ;
“ We have received the recognition document of our college from Southern
Regional Committee of NCTE to run one year duration M.Ed course on the date
03.09.2007.
We have received the recognition as “PET Post Graduate Centre for Education
and Research,Shankara College of Education,Mandya – 571401,Karnataka”
instead of Shankara Gowda College of Education,Mandya.
At the time of submission to NAAC,we have noticed a misprint in the name of our
college as Shankara College of Education.It should be “PET Post Graduate Center
for
Education
and
Research,Shankar
Gowda
College
of
Education,Mandya,Karnataka.
Now, we are in the process of submitting for Reaccredition to NAAC, for which we
have to submit the documents of both B.Ed and M.Ed.
As you are aware, name of the college should be exactly the same in all the
documents (NCTE recognition letter and affiliation letter from the University) We
request you to make correction as early as possible, so as to allow us to submit for
LOI to NAAC.”
The Committee considered the matter and advised Southern Regional Office
to correct the mistake of wrong address mentioned in the formal recognition
order for M.Ed course of the said institution issued, and to issue a revised
order by mentioning correct address as per the request of the institution
vide letter dt. 21/03/2013.
Table Agenda – Resubmission of all the cases pertaining to 7 Hills for (B.Ed-1, B.Ed-2 & D.Ed)
196
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
95
APS03835
B.Ed
Seven Hills
B.Ed College,
Vinukonda,
Guntur
AP
Seven Hills B.Ed college, Dhaakshna Bazar, Vinukonda-522647, Guntur
District, Andhra Pradesh.
Zilla Vikalangula Sangam, Vinukonda – 522647, Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh has submitted in the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of
recognition to Seven Hills B.Ed College, Dhakshna Bazar, Vinukonda –
522647, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course on 28/12/2004 for
one year duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993 and received in the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 31/12/2004.
The application was scrutinized and deficiency letter has been sent to the
institution on 12/04/2005. Institution has been asked to make good the deficiencies
by 31/12/2005. But the institution has not submitted the documents as required in
the above deficiency letter.
As a decision has been take to carry forward the pending applications received
during the year 2004, the above application is carry forwarded and processed as
per the latest Regulations of NCTE dated 27/12/2005.
Institution has paid application processing fee of Rs.40.000/- wide SRC receipt No.
5846 dated 31/12/2004.
Application was scrutinized and deficiency letter was issued to the institution on
19/07/2006.
The institution has submitted written representation dated 08/09/2006.
Considered the reply of the institution and a decision may be taken to send a
visiting team to the institution.
Meantime, the institution has approached to the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition
No. 20876 of 2005 in the matter of Seven Hills B.Ed College wherein the Hon’ble
High Court has passed an order dated 23/09/2005. The operative part of order as
under:“….the 1st respondent on the ground that the respondents 2 & 4 did not
issue any “No Objection Certificate” when the Petitioner approached them,
the 4th respondent verified the matter and on being told by the NCTE, that the
colleges for disabled are proposed to be established by themselves, by
entering into a memorandum of understanding with the rehabilitation council
of india, he communicated the same to the petitioner”.
Inspection of the institution was conducted on 19/12/2006.
The SRC in its 126th Meeting held on 20th-23rd February, 2007 considered the VT
report, essential documents furnished by the institution and the written
representation submitted by the institution, the NCTE Act of 1993. Regulations and
guidelines of NCTE published from time to time. The SRC resolved to accord
recognition for starting B.Ed programme by the above college with an intake of 100
students.
Accordingly, conditional recognition letter for starting B.Ed course issued to the
institution on 06/03/2007.
197
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The institution has submitted written representation on 26/03/2007.
The SRC in its 131st Meeting held on 10th-11th April, 2007 and decided that
unconditional Recognition be granted to the B.Ed course of one year duration with
an annual intake of 100 (one hundred only) (one unit)
The Unconditional Recognition order was issued to the institution on
12/04/2007.with certain stipulated conditions:
The office of SRC has received a letter dated 06/03/2007 from the Govt. of Andhra
Pradesh pointed out certain deficiencies followed by complains from different
quarters.
The SRC in its 150th Meeting held on 28th and 29th December, 2007 considered the
matter and decided to conduct inspection Under Section 17 of NCTE Act 1993.
The inspection of the institution under section 17 was conducted on 24/04/2008.
The SRC in its 161st Meeting held on 06th-07th August, 2008 the Committee after
careful consideration of all aspects decided to issued show casue notice to the
institution providing an opportunity to submit a written representation as per the
provision contained under section 17 of the NCTE act, 1993.
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to the institution on 26/08/2008.
The institution has submitted written representation on 22/09/2008 & 07/10/2008.
The reply of the institution was placed before SRC in its 166th meeting held on
28th-19th October, 2008 and decided to withdraw the recognition of the institution.
Accordingly, withdrawal of recognition order was issued to the institution
22/10/2008.
Aggrieved by the withdrawal order of SRC the institution preferred an appeal to
NCTE-Hqrs and the appellate authority in its order No. F.No.89-377/2008
Appeal/88198 dated 15/12/2008 stated that “…the council reached the
conclusion that there was no ground to accept the appeal and that it should
be rejected. Accordingly, the appeal was rejected and the SRC’s order dated
22/10/2008 refusing recognition to the institution was confirmed.
Meantime, this office is in receipt of W.P. No. 3610 of 2009 filed by Seven Hills
B.Ed College, Vinukonda, Guntur District, on 03/03/2009.
Accordingly, a parawise comments has been sent to the Advocate on 12/03/2009.
A Court order has been received from the Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh
on 09/04/2009. The Hon’ble Court has pass an order as follows:
“Interim order granted on 25/02/2009 and extended on 20/03/2009 is
extended until further orders”
In this regard a letter was sent to the advocate on 16/09/2009 with the request to
198
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
take measures to dispose of the case immediately.
Counter affidavit in respect of W.P. No. 3610 of 2009 in the matter of Seven Hills
B.Ed College Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
Meantime, A letter has been received from the institution on 12/07/2010 requesting
for sending the rectification order to the university and Govt. of Andhra Pradesh for
including the Seven Hills B.Ed College. Timmeyapalm Road, Vinukunda for the
Ed-CET counseling for the academic year 2010-11 being on the Hon’ble High
Court of Andhra Pradesh stay order in W.P.M.P. 4704 of 2009 in W.P. No. 3610 of
2009.
A letter addressed to all the universities sent on 15/07/2010 stating that “ a letter
dated 11/06/2010 wherein a list of institution (35 institutions) where SRC has
withdrawn recognition was sent to you, with the request not to all if any
students in such colleges for 2010-2011 in this regard, it is clarified that in
some of these institution have obtained stay orders from the Hon’ble High
Court on the operation of NCTE orders. In such cases the order of the
Hon’ble High Court may be honoured”.
The interim order was placed before SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd
November, 2012 and the Committee considered the matter and decided to writ to
advocate
for
obtain
stay
and
file
an
appeal.
As per the decision of SRC a letter was issued to the advocate on 13/02/2013.
A letter was sent to the advocate on 01/11/2012 requested to file an appeal and
vacate the above said order.
Note:As per the note above, the institution is running this college as per “interim order”
of the Hob’ble Court.
96
APS002914
B.Ed
Seven Hills
B.Ed College
Vinukonda,
Guntur,
AP
The Committee considered the matter and advised the Southern Regional
Office to remind the Lawyer for vocation of ‘Stay’ (referring to this office
letter dt. 01/11/2012 written to Lawyer for vocation of the stay) and to file an
early appeal.
Seven Hills B.Ed College, Vinukonda-522647, Vinukonda, Guntur, Andhra
Pradesh.
Zilla Vikalangula Sangam, Vinukonda – 522647, Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh has submitted in the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of
recognition to SevenHills B.Ed College, Vinukonda – 522647, Vinukonda,
Guntur, Andhra Pradesh for B.Ed Course on 29/01/2004 for one year duration
under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993 and received in the Southern Regional
Committee, NCTE on 09/02/2004.
The application was scrutinized and a letter has been issued on 08.09.2004 with
request to submit reply of deficiency by 31st December, 2004 at the latest failing
which your application will not be considered for the academic session 2005-06
and shall be treated as closed. Communications submitted after 31st December,
2004 will not be entertained.
199
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The institution has submitted written representation on 09/05/2004 aongwith a
copy of Hon’ble High court order in writ petition No.8948/2005 in the matter of
Seven Hills B.Ed college wherein the Hon’ble High court has passed an order
dated 10.04.2012. The operative part of order as under:“…….the respondents may be directed to consider the same request for the
ensuing year, for which the petitioner is going to make fresh application.
In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the
petitioner to renew its application for starting new B.Ed college at Vinukonda
within one month from today, in which event the respondents are directed to
consider and dispose of the said application of the petitioner along with the
existing reports and also fresh reports to be called for in this regard, on
merits and as per rules as expeditiously as possible.”
As per the Court direction the SRC considered the matter and decided in 223rd
SRC meeting held on 29th-31st May 2012 to await for petitioners application and
place the same before the Next SRC meeting.
The institution has submitted written representation on 06/07/2012 along with a
copy of application and other relevant documents.
The same was placed before SRC in its 228th Meeting held on 24th-25th July, 2012
and the Committee considered the reply of the institution vide letter dt. 06.07.2012
and all the relevant documentary evidences and it was decided to serve Final
Show cause Notice under section 14 (1) of NCTE Act, for the following:

Original certified copy of the land documents from Govt. authority is not submitted.
Notarized English version of the certified copy land documents not submitted.

Approved blue print of the building plan issued by competent civil authority is not
submitted.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt. authorized engineer
is not submitted.

Notarized land usage certificate from the Revenue divisional office stating that the
agriculture land converted to non-agriculture for the Educational Purpose is not
submitted. Proceedings of Revenue Divisional Officer not submitted for conversion
of land from agricultural to educational purposes.

Original FDRs of Rs. 5 & 3 lacs towards endowment and reserve fund from a
Nationalized Bank in favour of Society/college/institution name is not given.

Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by sub-registrar is not submitted.

Details of other courses being run in the same building/premises is not submitted.

Details of other application submitted to SRC NCTE for seeking recognition to
teacher educational courses for the session 2012-2013 is not given.
200
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Accordingly, a final show cause notice was issued to the institution on 21/08/2012.
The institution has submitted written representation on 11/09/2012.
The reply of the institution was placed before SRC in its 233rd Meeting held on
26th-28th September, 2012 considered the written reply of the institution vide letter
dt, 11.09.2012 and decided to thoroughly examine all the 3 course(cases) of the
institution viz., APS03835-B.Ed, APS02914 – B.Ed & APS03806-D.Ed courses
and put up.
As per the decision of SRC all the 3 courses of the institution was examine and
placed before SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 20th-21st November, 2012
considered the reply of the institution and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause composite inspection under NCTE Act, to examine whether the
institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified
by the institution, as per the norms and on receipt of Rs. 50000/- inspection fee.
Accordingly, a letter was sent to the institution on 17/01/2013.
Meantime, the institution has submitted a letter dated. 28/1/2013, Stated that “I
submitted an application for seeking grant for starting B.Ed Course. now I
am not willing to run two B.Ed Colleges in one name and one village in the
name and style of “SEVEN HILLS B.ED COLLEGE” Vinukonda, Guntur
District, so I withdrawal my application. Hence I request you sir to kindly
withdraw my application in APSO2914 for the B.Ed course so need not to
pay the 50.000/- Rupees towards inspection fee”.
The matter was placed before SRC in its 241st Meeting held on 29th-31st March, 1st
April, 2013 and the committee decided to Put up all three cases (B.Ed-1, D.Ed &
B.Ed-2) together in the next SRC meeting.
As per the decision of SRC all 3 cases examine and put up Annexure-I & II
Note:- As per the letter of the institution dated 28/01/2013, of the institution that
they are withdrawing the application of APS0 2914 for the B.Ed course.
97
APS03806
D.Ed
Seven Hills
Teacher
Training
Institution,
Guntur
AP
The committee considered the matter and as per the request of the
institution the B.Ed course (APS02914) is permitted to withdraw, as the said
course was applied along with another course (APS03835-B.Ed course) at
the same time. The case is closed.
Seven Hills Teacher Taining Institution, Dhakshana Bazar, Vinukonda522647, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh.
Zilla Vikalangula Sangam, Vinukonda – 522647, Guntur District, Andhra
Pradesh has submitted in the Southern Regional Committee of NCTE for grant of
recognition to Seven Hills Teacher Training Institution, Dhakshana
Bazar,Vinukonda-522647, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh for D.Ed Course for
one year duration under section 14(1) of the NCTE Act. 1993 and received in the
Southern Regional Committee, NCTE on 31/12/2004.
The application was scrutinized and a letter has been issued on 01/10/2008 with
request to submit reply of deficiency within a period of 90days.
201
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The institution has submitted written representation on 10/02/2009.
The SRC in its 172nd Meeting held on 25/06th March, 2009 considered the
applications of the following four institutions and observed that these institutions
have made applications seeking grant of recognition for D.Ed course under
regulations 1.1.2004 of NCTE. As per the regulations, only those institutions which
had obtained recognition for B.Ed course can make application for establishment
of D.Ed course without NOC from the State Government. But, these institutions,
without having B.Ed colleges, have made applications for D.Ed course, which are
not eligible for consideration(without Government’s NOC). The Government of
Andhra Pradesh has taken a general policy decision not to recommend any new
College for D.Ed./B.Ed. programmes.
Under the above circumstances, SRC decided to close the following applications
and intimate the same to the individual institutions.
1. Zilla Vikalangula Sangam, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. Mesco College of
Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh. Adarsha Teacher Training Institute,
Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh. Seven Hills Teacher Training Institute, Guntur,
Andhra Pradesh.
Accordingly, a rejection order was issued to the institution on 21/04/2009(for
Seven Hills Teacher Training Institute APS03806-D.Ed).
Meantime, a Court notice in W.P. No. 9557 of 2009 dated 13/04/2009 as been
received from the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad with the
direction that respondent No. 1 (SRC-NCTE) to be appear before the Court on
01/06/2009.
The institution has prayed that the “…1st respondent in rejecting the application
of the petitioner without conducting inspection and in not granting
recognition for the establishment of a college for Teacher Education at
Vinukonda, Guntur District as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and
contrary to the provisions of the NCTE Act and the Regulations made there
under and consequently set aside the orders of the 1st Respondent in
F.AP/SRO/NCTE/2009-2010/11898, dated 21/04/2009 directing the 1st
respondent to grant recognition to the petitioner’s College for Teacher
Education at Vinukonda, Guntur District, to run D.Ed. courses, and pass
such further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper
in the circumstances of the case”.
Again a Court notice alongwith court order in W.P. M.P. No. 12462 of 2009, W.P.
No. 9557 of 2009 dated as been received from the High Court of Judicature,
Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad with the direction that respondent No. 1 (SRCNCTE) to be appear before the Court on 01/06/2009 as under:
“…the 1st respondent to forthwith conduct inspection of the petitioner’s facilities
at Vinukonda, Guntur District and pass orders on the petitioner’s application for
grant of recognition as a College for Teacher Education, to run D.Ed. Courses, for
the Academic Session 2009-2010 onwards, pending disposal of the above Writ
Petition and pass such further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit
and proper in the circumstances of the case”.
202
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
The above Court order was placed before SRC 177th Meeting held on 22nd-23rd
June, 2009 considered and decided to file an appeal and request the State Govt.
also to file the counter.
As per the decision of the SRC a letter was sent to the advocate on 10/07/2009.
Meantime, a e-mail letter has been received on 30/11/2009 with requested to draft
counters for signatures and return the same immediately with 2 + 3 copies (single
side on white paper). Hence, kindly, send them after signatures especially W.P.No.
6932 of 2009, which involves urgency.
Accordingly, counter affidavit in respect of W.P.No. 9557 of 2009 sent to the
advocate on 02/12/2009.
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on 21st-22nd November, 2012 considered the
Court direction and decided to cause composite inspection and receipt of payment
(as per the decision copy) whereas (as per the minutes of the SRC) decided to
await for the final disposal of the matter by Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh.
Note:- As per the record, the application rejected and closed on 21/04/2009.
Aggrieved by the rejection order the institution moved to the Hon’ble High Court of
Andhra Pradesh and the Hon’ble Court as directed the 1st respondent to grant
recognition.
The Court order was placed before SRC 177th Meeting held on 22nd-23rd June,
2009 and the Committee decided to request the legal counsel to file an appeal and
request the State Govt. also to file the counter.
Accordingly, a letter to legal counsel sent on 10/07/2009, whereas letter to the
state Govt. not sent.
Again the same Court order in W.P. 9557 of 2009 (in which SRC was already
taken a decision in 177th Meeting) was placed before SRC in its 235th Meeting held
on 21st-22nd November, 2012 considered the Court direction and decided to cause
composite inspection and receipt of payment (as per the decision copy) whereas
(as per the minutes of the SRC) decided to await for the final disposal of the matter
by Hon’ble High court of Andhra Pradesh.
Further, this office has not received any Court order and also no reply has been
received from the advocate. Not known the institution is running D.El.Ed course. It
is observed from the application the Court case is still pending.
The Committee considered the matter, decided that, as per NCTE Regulation
2004, (the institution had applied for D.El.Ed course APS03806 in the year dt.
31/12/2004), the institution must have a recognized B.Ed course to run
D.El.Ed course. Seven Hills Teacher Training Institution, Dhakshana Bazar,
Vinukonda-522647, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh, did not have
recognized B.Ed course before applying for D.El.Ed course. Therefore, in the
circumstances, the institution can not be given permission for D.El.Ed
course to run. Further, No Court will also given an order for grant of
recognition in such circumstances.
203
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
Further, the committee advised Southern Regional Office to check with our
Lawyer on facts regarding this case. It is also advised to write to Lawyer to
secure the copy of the Court Order (in both WPs No.s 9557 of 2009 & WP
(MP) 12462 to send it for our record.
The Committee further, advised to request SCERT to check and advise
whether the institution is at all running the D.El.Ed course.
98
SRCAPP483
D.El.Ed
Seven Hills
Teacher
Training
Institution,
Guntur
AP
Seven Hills Teacher Training Institution, Vinukonda Village and Post Office,
Vinukonda Taluka and City, Guntur District – 522 647, Andhra Pradesh
Zilla Vikalagula Sangam, Vinukonda Village and Post Office, Vinukonda
Taluka and City, Guntur District – 522 647, Andhra Pradesh had applied for
grant of recognition to Seven Hills Teacher Training Institution, Vinukonda
Village and Post Office, Vinukonda Taluka and City, Guntur District – 522
647, Andhra Pradesh for D.El.Ed Course of two years duration under Section
14(1) of the NCTE Act, 1993 to the Southern Regional Committee, NCTE online
on 16.08.2011 and physical application has been received in the office of SRC on
23.08.2011 (Dispatched on 18.08.2011).
The application was scrutinized and a copy of application was sent to State
Government for recommendation on 26.08.2011. A deficiency letter was issued to
the institution on 09.09.2011. The institution had replied to the deficiency letter on
28.11.2011.
The SRC in its 215th Meeting held on 12th – 13th December, 2011 considered the
reply of the institution dt. 28.11.2011 for the deficiency letter issued to the
institution on 09.09.2011 and come to the conclusion that, since the institution has
not replied to the deficiency letter within 60 days, the application was rejected for
not receiving the reply within 60 days.
Accordingly a rejection order was issued to the institution on 03.02.2012.
The institution had approached to Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No. 27029 of
2012. The Hon’ble High Court has directed as under:“The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the schedule of counseling
for D.El.Ed course has not yet been announced.
In view of the same, respondent No. 1 is directed to reconsider the petitioner’s
application and order inspection of the letter’s institution within two weeks from the
date of receipt of this order. If before the inspection report is filed by the visiting
team the scheduled for counseling is not announced, the petitioner’s institution
shall be include for counseling for the academic year 2012-13 subject to its
fulfillment of all the norms of the National Council for Teacher Education.
Subject to the above direction the writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated
above. As a sequel WPMP No. 34428 of 2012 is disposed of as infructuous.”
The matter was brought to the notice and directed to legal counsel to apply for
stay and file an appeal. Further SRC chairperson directed to bring the notice of the
204
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013
counsel of SRC at Hyderabad the following judgement of Hon’ble Supreme court
in Civil Appeal NO. 1125-1128/ 2011 in the matter of Bhanwar anwar Singh,
Shiksha Mahavidalaya and ors dated 31.01.2011, the gist of which is reproduced
below.
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfils the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the
conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule
fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and
communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered
to”
The SRC in its 235th Meeting held on November 2012 considered as per the
direction of the Hon’ble High Court order and all other relevant documents and
decided to cause composite inspection under NCTE Act, to examine whether
the institution fulfils all the requirements as per the norms, for the proposed
programme, subject to the condition that the deficiencies, if any, were duly rectified
by the institution, as per the norms and on receipt of Rs. 50000/- inspection fee.
Further, the committee also decided to file an appeal and apply for stay, since the
institution filed writt petition in WP. No. 27019 of 2012.
As per the directions of SRC, a letter was issued to Sri. Madhava Rao (Advocate)
with the request to apply for stay and file an appeal and defend the case on behalf
of SRC – NCTE and to intimate the developments of the case to this office from
time to time.
The institution, in its letter dt. 29.01.2013 has submitted Original DD of Rs. 50000/DD No. 003321 dt. 23.09.2004 towards inspection fees.
The inspection of the institution was fixed between 10th – 15th February, 2013. The
same was intimated to institution on 31.01.2013. The inspection was conducted on
12.02.2013. The VT report was received by SRC on 18.02.2013.
The Committee considered the VT report, VCD and other relevant documents
of the institution, found that the deficiencies still persist as under:

The institution has submitted encumbrance certificate up to
26.09.2011. Up-to-date encumbrance certificate issued by subregistrar is not submitted.

Original Affidavit in the prescribed form on Rs. 100/- stamp paper duly
attested by oath Commissioner or notary public, is not submitted.
The institution has submitted only photocopy of the affidavit.

As per VT report, the total built up area given as 1733.54
sq.ft.(however, on calculation the total built up area comes to 11917
sq.ft), which is less than the requirement of 16000 sq.ft. as per NCTE
norms 2009.

Original building completion certificate from competent Govt.
engineer is not submitted. The institution has submitted only
photocopy of building completion certificate.
205
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman
242nd Meeting of SRC
14th –16th April 2013

The institution does not fulfill all the conditions in view of the above
as directed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal NO. 11251128/2011 in the matter of Bhanwar singh, Shiksha Mahavidalaya and
ors dt. 31.01.2011, the gist of which is reproduced below.
“An institution is not entitled to recognition unless it fulfills the conditions
specified in various clauses of the Regulations. The Council is directed to
ensure that in future no institution is granted recognition unless it fulfils the
conditions laid down in the Act and the Regulations and the time schedule
fixed for processing the application by the Regional Committee and
communication of the decision on the issue of recognition it strictly adhered
to”.
Under the above grounds and with reference to the totality of information
collected & based on a collective application of mind, the committee decided
as per NCTE Regulations 2009, to refuse and reject the application of the
institution for recognition of D.El.Ed course.
206
(S.Sathyam)
Chairman