Module 2 Activities Case Study 1 Knowledge Check Activity 1 (To be submitted for assessment) 1. The way that Glaister carried out his investigations is most likely to have been influenced by: (a) (b) (c) (d) 2. The way that Hammond carried out his investigations is most likely to have been influenced by: (a) (b) (c) (d) 3. Jean Pierre Megnin Sir Edward Richard Henry William Henry Herschel Henry Faulds The way that Mearns carried out his investigation is most likely to have been influenced by: (a) (b) (c) (d) 4. Mathieu Orfila Sir Bernard Spilsbury Bergeret d'Arbois Masato Soba, Jean Pierre Megnin Edmund Locard William Henry Herschel Foster & Freeman Examination of the skull sutures can help determine: (a) (b) (c) (d) Gender Ethnicity Age Cause of death 5. To determine that Isabella Ruxton and Mary Jane Rogerson had been murdered in 2 Dalton Place, Glaister conducted: (a) (b) (c) (d) 6. An autopsy is: (a) (b) (c) (d) 7. Rotting flesh Human hair samples Insects Teeth A serologist analyses: (a) (b) (c) (d) 9. The post mortem examination of a body A method of lifting fingerprints from dead bodies A device for collecting insects from a cadaver An instrument for estimating time of death Entomology is the study of: (a) (b) (c) (d) 8. DNA tests Serum tests The Marsh test Chemical analysis The fingerprints of dead bodies Blood and DNA samples Footprints Old newspapers Articles of evidence in this case were carefully collected, labelled, stored and recorded to avoid: (a) (b) (c) (d) Claims for damages Breaking the chain of continuity of evidence Upsetting Dr. Ruxton The newspapers taking photographs Module 2 Case Study 1 The Bodies in the Stream (The Jigsaw Case) Activity 2 (to be submitted for assessment) In the table below list five of the forensic specialists (e.g. Pathologist) who played an important role in collecting the evidence which convicted the killer in this case. In no more than 100 words describe what these five specialists did and how this helped to convict the killer. Specialist Role in this case