PROPER TY I N P E R S P E CT IV E ISSUE 17 -R edevelopment, rezoning, repositioning: does it lead to revaluation? -E xperiences of a fourth generation residential real estate investor: “Successful residential leasing combined with social responsibility” AUTUMN 2015 > 1 -V isualisation and analytics of real estate data are the future> 9 - Changes in portfolio > 12 > 6 Redevelopment, rezoning, repositioning: does it lead to revaluation? Let us start at the end: we all like positive revaluation. For some real estate, especially old, obsolete, vacant and unattractive real estate, there is no other choice than to fundamentally change the targeted users. Often, this involves substantial investment. For a real estate investor, these investments can only be justified if the expected future return offsets the remaining value of the property plus the necessary investments to redefine a building. This article will highlight the fact that huge investments are not always needed to drastically improve the value of your assets. But should you redevelop, rezone or reposition? This article contains a few creative examples to inspire you and some thoughts on three ways to add value to your real estate. EXAMPLES The 18th century lighthouse at Harlingen, a small town in the north of the Netherlands fell into disuse in 1998. Shortly after, it was transformed into a one-bedroom hotel / bed & breakfast. A U T U M N 2 0 15 1 The bridge-keeper’s house in Leiden, obviously not a job title you hear anymore, was transformed into a tourist facility that rents out boats and provides on board catering. Amsterdam’s ‘Westergasfabriek’, a gas plant that formerly provided the city’s energy, was transformed into a cultural attraction with a theatre and restaurants called “cultuurpark Westergasfabriek”. Maastricht’s Dominican Church is now in use as a large bookshop. The former savings bank ‘Rijkspostspaarbank’ and the former head office of the ‘Volkskrant’ newspaper in Amsterdam have become hotels; its rooms carry themes devised by the cartoonist, Opland. 2 PROPERTY IN PERSPECTIVE Hospitality often provides new ideas for tourist attractions: an old haystack that has been turned into a Bed & Breakfast on a farm or the water tower in Dordrecht that dates back to around 1900 that has become a hotel. IBUS recently acquired an old printing office that belonged to the former communist party, which is being transformed into fashionable loft apartments in the centre of Düsseldorf. Although partly theoretical, it is useful to discriminate between redevelopment, rezoning and repositioning. • Operational: replacing management, adding new functions to the building such as carports, bike sheds, a pantry, a washroom etc. REPOSITIONING A modern way to upgrade an office building could be to transform it into an air-purifier. This is exactly what a Dutch initiative is trying to realise. During a visit to Beijing, Daan Roosegaarde, a Dutch designer, and his team were triggered by the effect of smog on people’s daily lives. They came up with the idea of creating the world’s largest air purifier: a Smog Free Tower. Roosegaarde and his team of experts have used patented nanotechnology to build the world’s largest smog vacuum cleaner. The Smog Free Tower produces smog-free bubbles of public space, enabling people to breathe and experience clean air for free. The first sevenmeter-high Smog Free Tower cleans 30,000 m3 of air per hour of ultra-fine smog, uses no more electricity than a water boiler, and runs on green Repositioning might seem to be the least drastic in financial terms. Generally speaking, the use of the building remains intact. The “look” of the building will change to attract different kinds of users. The investment strategy could be to upgrade the building in a way that would justify higher rental levels. Upgrading could be: •Cosmetic: the ‘look & feel’ are improved, e.g. by painting, art works, design, a more modern interior or by adding a garden. •Structural: changing or replacing installations, adding space, making buildings more energy efficient or creating sport facilities or a swimming pool in the building. A U T U M N 2 0 15 3 energy. Roosegaarde also creates jewellery from the smog particles collected, as a tangible souvenir. The carbon-filled smog dust is compressed to produce high-end jewellery like the Smog Free Ring and Smog Free Cufflinks. The Smog Free Project is not only intended to be a definitive local solution for clean parks, but also as a sensory experience of a clean future. Along with governments, NGOs and the clean-tech industry, people can become part of the solution instead of part of the problem. The intention is to take the prototype on a world tour to gain supporters. In future, when office buildings are upgraded, this could provide an opportunity to implement the nanotechnology-based filters in office buildings. REZONING Rezoning, as in the case of repositioning, normally leaves the structure of the building unchanged. However, what it does is give the building a new function while retaining its original identity. The use and purpose of a building change dramatically while its specific or historic character helps to make the building or the site special and authentic. Its special character reinforces the attractiveness of the building or site with its new function. As the building remains architecturally and structurally intact, the investment can be lower than in the case of complete redevelopment, but is normally higher than for re-positioning. Although not a typical place for rezoning, the New York High Line project is a high profile example of giving a new use and function to an old site. A portion of the Manhattan West Side Elevated Highway, which had opened to trains in 1934, had fallen into disuse in the 1960s and was closed in 1980. Construction work to repurpose the railway into an urban park began in 2006 and the third and final phase opened in 2014. Dutch garden designer Piet Oudolf was responsible for designing the layout of the park, creating a unique landscape with 210 species of plants including many that were formerly embedded in railway gravel. Stretches of the iron track evoke its former use. This rezoning project reinforced the gentrification of the Meatpacking District which has been transformed from a criminal and drug traffic borough in the 1980s into the New York’s ‘most fashionable quarter’. 4 REDEVELOPMENT When a building or site is redeveloped, its architectural structure is normally fundamentally changed requiring its entire or partial demolition followed by new construction. This often involves higher investment costs. In fact it could lead to a building being valued at land value minus demolition costs before redevelopment. A spectacular redevelopment of a site took place at the new high-speed railway station in Liège, Belgium. The city had been in the doldrums for years but in September 2009 a new hyper-modern railway station, designed by the Spanish architect Calatrava, was opened. The iconic building helped the ‘rebirth’ of the city. Tourists are attracted by the spectacular design of the station, thus creating an impulse for new offices, retail and apartments as well as a new city axis with many pedestrian zones and cycle paths. How one building really became a catalyst for the city and created spin-off for the social and cultural climate in Liège. DISRUPTION Our world is changing rapidly and dramatically through technology, including 3D-printing, a globalised society, digital communication, the “internet of things”, on demand co-workers through online outsourcing and digital platforms to hire personnel, and online shopping. New business concepts can be quite disruptive to existing business models too. Kodak was forced out of business by digital photography; major airlines are suffering because of cost-cutters; V&D department stores are being squeezed by formulas such as Action and Primark; taxi companies are confronted with Über; hotels have to cope with Airbnb, etc. What will supermarkets look like in the future for instance? Will they remain a traditional inner city building where groceries are put in a shopping cart or will they become a drive-through Pick Up Point at an airport for example? Dutch grocery store Albert Heijn has opened a Pick Up Point that looks like a petrol station: after having ordered their groceries online and choosing their desired pick up time-slot, shoppers go to the airport pick up point, insert a special pass in a pass reader, open the boot of their car and their groceries are put in their car in a box that has been specially prepared for them. The question PROPERTY IN PERSPECTIVE now is whether this will be the new way of grocery shopping in the future or whether it will remain a temporary fashion for the interested few. Buildings, however, seem to change slowly. This is logical because structures made from concrete or bricks and mortar are built to last 50 years or more. Using the structural shell of a building for new functions and purposes will enable creative investors to generate a return with new opportunities. A U T U M N 2 0 15 5 Experiences of a fourth generation residential real estate investor: “Successful residential leasing combined with social responsibility” An interview with Sieb Zeilstra – Zeilstra Beheer B.V. Zeilstra Beheer B.V. (Zeilstra Beheer) is a family business which started in The Hague around 1900. The company is currently one of the leading residential property managers in the Netherlands and is still privately owned. The accumulated experience of four generations has provided input for a business model based on close interaction between asset managers and property managers. This serves one goal: to know what tenants are experiencing with respect to the property and translate that into strategic investment decisions. For over a century now, the asset focus has always been on main-stream, affordable housing. We spoke to Sieb Zeilstra, owner and director of Zeilstra Beheer. His great-grandfather started the business and from then on, experience and knowledge were passed from father to son. This interview offers an insight into the apparently successful vision and strategy that has kept the Zeilstra family business thriving. Sieb Zeilstra is also a board member of ‘Vastgoed Belang’, a branch organisation representing the interests of private real estate investors. Could you talk us through the greatest challenges since Zeilstra Beheer was founded? The greatest challenges throughout the years were the various economic crises; somehow it seems that every generation has its own crisis to deal with. My great-grandfather started in business as a carpenter. Around 1900, there was little work available in Workum (Friesland) and the Zeilstra family moved to The Hague. At the time, the family’s activities were mainly concentrated on the construction of houses. As money was tight and the number of people who could afford a house still limited, the Zeilstra family ended up owning some of the houses they had built themselves. These units were rented out and this was in fact the beginning of the current management organisation. The second generation had two major crises to deal with: the great depression in the 1930s and the Second World War. In an environment characterised by deflation, individual incomes were falling and the number of bona fide tenants dwindled. By implementing successful tenant retention programmes the company managed to stay afloat. In fact the post-war period was also a time in which the company was able to expand. My grandfather was appointed as an appraiser for 6 the Dutch state, to solve all kinds of land issues. He was a predecessor of the current real estate appraisers, a profession which did not exist in those days. My father – third generation – had to cope with the oil and energy crisis in the 1970/1980s and with towering interest rates. He decided that the real estate values and low cap rates in the 1970’s were no longer realistic and so he sold most of his properties. The massive downturn in house prices as a consequence of interest rates of up to 14% gave him an excellent opportunity to reinvest. He built up a newly acquired family portfolio, which partially contained the units he had sold some years before. As a member of the fourth generation, I found myself coping with the results of the latest financial and real estate crises. Prior to 2013, the residential market came to a standstill when financing was difficult. By our tight implementation of the combination of property and asset management, we retained a good feeling for tenants’ demands and we were able to keep vacancy low and prices at market level. What are your thoughts on the challenges and opportunities in the residential market? First of all, there is a great difference between the Amsterdam market and the rest of the Netherlands. Residential properties in Amsterdam are in great demand among basically all groups: tenants, owner occupiers and investors. However, in a lot of other cities rent increases are much more limited, especially in the lower bracket. The majority of people cannot afford to pay any more rent. Residential owners still have to work hard to keep units leased in a lot of places. Changing demographic patterns is another big issue which has an impact on PROPERTY IN PERSPECTIVE the number of tenants and the type of houses required. Due to the considerable transparency of the market, tenants are becoming more and more aware and critical of the price they pay for a certain level of quality (finish, location, size, etc.). If the price is perceived as being too high for the quality received, for example due to overdue maintenance or general outdatedness, there will be an increase in tenant turnover and vacancy periods. This logic applies to both the subsidised residential market and the open market. This implies that residential owners are being forced to invest in units with sometimes only limited financial return. This is exactly the reason why property managers are so important at Zeilstra Beheer. Without sufficient knowledge about the wishes and troubles of individual tenants, asset managers cannot take appropriate action and rental income will eventually dwindle and/or cost of investment will get out of control. We see opportunities in middle segment, nonsubsidised residential real estate. In our view, this segment ranges from the liberalisation level – a monthly net rent of EUR 710.68 – to approximately EUR 850. Often people make the mistake of defining this segment as going up to EUR 1,000, but this is only the case in Amsterdam. Outside Amsterdam net rents in this segment are significantly lower. We focus on good quality, smaller units in the vicinity of different amenities (such as retail and public transport). The difficult part is implementing rent increases within the tight individual budget of middleincome tenants when both the government – through legislation – and the market – through transparency – are creating downward pressure on rents due to the demand for quality. Which tendencies do you see in the finance market? The finance market – the banks – is still struggling with the real estate market. Many of the banks still have undesirable and overly financed real estate-secured loans on their balance sheet. On top of this, staffing of real estate departments at banks has generally decreased, as has their familiarity with the market. Together with the extensive new regulations and reporting requirements imposed by the DNB/AFM, this has led to a strict risk mitigating attitude that A U T U M N 2 0 15 limits both new and current loans. As a result, banks claimed a large part of residential investors’ free cash flow to reduce LTV. This reduced investors’ opportunities to adapt and modernise buildings, which had a negative impact on occupancy, rental income and cash flow. But it has to be said that the climate seems to be changing a bit. Foreign investors are exhibiting considerable interest in the Dutch housing sector. Some banks are showing more appetite for new deals and are beginning to recognize the attractiveness of the Dutch residential sector. What are your thoughts on the governmentimposed tax on subsidised rental units (verhuurdersheffing)? This tax measure is probably the biggest injustice imposed on private residential investors in the last centuries. Of course there was a need to restructure the financing of housing corporations. However the “verhuurdersheffing” was also imposed on private residential investors who, in contrast to the housing corporations, never benefitted from state secured loans. And in a lot of instances these private investors are competing for the same tenants. The rationale was that, as compensation for these higher taxes, owners – both housing corporations and private/institutional investors – would be allowed to increase their rent based on tenant income. However, there is one flaw in this line of thought. Housing corporations generally lease their subsidised units at 70% of the maximum rent, which means there is ample room for increasing current rents to achieve the compensation allowed. The majority of private/ institutional investors, however, were already letting their units at either the maximum rent allowed or at market rent. This means there is either no legal base for a rent increase or it is not possible from a market perspective to apply the rent increase without the risk of higher vacancy. The new tax designed to recoup old government funds is therefore being paid for by the private sector, without compensation for the most part. New investors have the opportunity to bring their investment models into line with the new tax situation. The “verhuurdersheffing” came more or less at the same time as the change to the banks’ financial criteria and therefore had a substantial impact on the free cash flow of private investors. The current 7 levels of the “verhuurdersheffing” have been set until 2017. We are making efforts to mitigate the impact of these measures in conjunction with Vastgoed Belang. What would you say are the general trends in the residential market? First of all, cost control will become more and more important. Due to increased market transparency, tenants are becoming more and more price conscious and critical of the price of residential quality on offer. When rents are under pressure but high quality still has to be provided, margins are squeezed, thus increasing the need for tighter cost control. Moreover, a higher proportion of equity in new (but also in standing) investments will be required to reduce banks’ anxiety. This should lead to better long-term conditions and relationships with banks, although it will create downward pressure on return on investment. A combination of cost control and low leverage in today’s environment might enable a direct return of approximately 4% with a 2% upward potential for indirect return. As of 2015 we are seeing a substantial increase in prices when assets are sold, especially in de Randstad. Finally, make sure you do not only invest in the general quality of the property but also in the sustainability of the properties. As mentioned before, tenants are becoming ever more critical about property quality. Interest in sustainability may only be limited at the moment, but in the near future, it is likely to become a more important feature if tenants’ perception of quality. Tenants will move if they feel that there is an imbalance between price and quality. Professional management will be of the utmost importance. 8 PROPERTY IN PERSPECTIVE Visualisation and analytics of real estate data are the future Interview with Arjan Knibbe – KR&A Arjan Knibbe founded KR&A in 2014. After working for many years as a sell-side real estate analyst with Kempen & Co, UBS and ING, Knibbe started his own firm. KR&A offers a broad range of data solutions for real estate companies. In Knibbe’s view, the real estate sector is failing to use data sufficiently for decision making. In contrast to many tenants, investors and developers are lagging behind in the use of data-derived information. They are still only using old-school, backward-looking research and experience for decision making. Knibbe believes that data analytics and the resulting information has become a competitive advantage to real estate companies. To give an example, KR&A is able to make a map of a city that visualises all shopArjan Knibbe ping centres by size for each postal code zone, indicating, for instance the level of education, inhabitants per square meter and degree of online shopping. Investors use this research to decide whether or not to invest in a particular centre, whether or not to add certain retail players, etcetera. We spoke to Arjan Knibbe about his ideas of how to use big data in real estate. What triggered your fascination for a “different kind of real estate research” in 2014? I always had a strong fascination for the way map makers turn data into beautiful visualisations. And as an investment banking analyst, I’ve been working with data for years. I was attending a course on Big Data in 2013 as part of a management programme. And all the time I was thinking: ‘Why is no one using this, not even the real estate hedge funds?’ Then it struck me that the vested interests in our industry, in particular those of real estate agents, are so massive that there is no incentive to innovate with data in our industry. Sharing transaction data is compulsory in most financial markets but a near-crime in real estate. The non-commodity nature of real estate does not help to generate interest in data either. In addition, experience in real estate markets is more valuable than experience in other markets such as the telco or IT industry. Experienced A U T U M N 2 0 15 leaders in real estate can feel threatened by the new insights that data can offer. Data shifts power to data analysts and that has political consequences for many of the real estate alpha males, especially those who are low on content. I have been a real estate analyst since 1994 and I really sympathize with this shift of power. I also strongly believe that data can contribute to a more effective allocation of the external effects of real estate and capital gains throughout society. By using data we should be able to build better, more efficient, more pleasant and more sustainable cities. We are delighted to be working with institutional investors on this journey towards incorporating data and using data to increase the impact of financial investments on society. You worked most of your professional life as a real estate analyst on stock exchange listed companies. How did that approach differ from your present perspective? Nowadays I set my own agenda, in conjunction with my clients. When you work for a boutique firm like Kempen & Co or a global powerhouse like UBS Warburg, you are part of a machine. A machine needs to be managed but management layers often distort the optimal allocation of time and energy, and most of the time they reduce creativity, certainly in investment banking. A possible exception is financial engineering, where creativity seemed very present. But we all know what that led to. The real estate landscape can only change slowly. Cities change very slowly and larger players change slowly. Much of the perspective that I developed as a sell-side analyst is still very relevant today. 9 Is it difficult to make geo-visualisations of a range of data? Not anymore. The thing is to select the right, relevant data from the big pool of data. It is also remarkably cheap, if you keep large IT corporates out. Technology is democratising knowledge including geo-visualised knowledge. A portfolio mapping system that cost an investor EUR 100,000 just five years ago can be built for less than 25% of that today, with at least ten times the performance in speed and storage capacity. And prices are falling. That is bad news for vested interests but it offers opportunities for others like KR&A. Much of the data you are using is public data; some is private data: how do you work to find this data? By just putting in long hours working and searching and by conducting constant discussions with data scientists and clients. It also takes time to develop relations and understand quality differences between private data providers. Our clients are public and private real estate investors, developers, institutional investors, including insurance companies and pension funds, and banks. We also offer services to investors that invest in listed real estate securities. They all require different data. It is the combination of a deep understanding of the real estate industry and the computer science mindset and skill sets. How is KR&A organised? It’s very lean. We really try to benefit from all the flexibility that comes with the Dutch ZZP [self-employed] system. Effectively we have five permanent contributors inside the company and about five outside. On top of that we have external accountants and lawyers. We share more information than strictly necessary, but try not to waste each other’s time. ‘KR&A insiders’ have backgrounds in Investment Banking, Computer Science, Retailing and Architecture. We value international backgrounds and perspective when we hire. Our offices in Spaces Vijzelstraat in Amsterdam accommodate our flexibility, as we rent far less space than we would in a traditional setting, be it at a much higher price per net square meter. On a busy day, people just pick up their stuff and find a comfy chair or a closed office cell to work, read, listen or talk. 10 Most of us work part-time, but any one of us can quickly step up to 150% when clients so require. We are all client-obsessed and we compete on quality, flexibility and speed, not on price. When we discuss real estate and data we are completely at ease at board level and with the largest institutional investors in the world. Our products are consultancy, a research membership for institutional investors and real estate web portals. We behave and approach problems as a start-up, for as long as possible. But we don’t mind wearing a tie when required. We’ve been there. Tenants often use turnover data per product; sales per location; impact of discount offers; time related sales and related product sales per consumer to improve their advertising and marketing efforts and product offer. What kind of data should real estate investors use? That is highly dependent on the investor’s markets, regions, property sectors and risk appetite. We have spent months designing a framework to address this question and we are more than happy to discuss our framework with clients. It would be naïve and unfair to customers to broadcast the answer to your important question here today. In contrast to many start-ups, KR&A is not a very naïve place and we do have many well-informed clients, whom we value highly. Is there a difference between private and institutional real estate investors? Yes, there is a difference, but it diminishes the larger the private investor becomes. Private investors seem to be slightly less impressed by 30-year-old Harvard MBAs explaining how you should play European real estate markets. Maybe this is because they seem to be thriftier in the way they manage their own money, compared to those managing other people’s money. Maybe some institutional investors enjoy the back slapping, fame and glory at conferences a bit more than private investors. Institutional investors in the Netherlands are probably underpaid. Often private investors have less regard for the academic approach to investment than institutional investors. PROPERTY IN PERSPECTIVE You worked many years for big financial institutions; now you have founded a start-up. What are the differences and what is your start-up experience? It is different in many ways. Banks were told to stop being a utility and start outperforming other banks. They tried and most failed. That was hard for society as it had to bail many of them out. So now banks are being told they are utilities again, in the Netherlands much more than in the rest of Europe. This is very sad in my view, because the Netherlands used to have a credible investment banking community position and we lost it. Not because of competition but because of self-imposed regulation and, in my opinion, a national intolerance for stellar performance and pay. are concerned about the quality of cities and externalities of their real estate portfolios, developments or loans. We want to have a truly PanEuropean perspective and become a thought leader on data for real estate. Our most important ambition is to create tangible, clear and undisputed value for clients and society. I believe that we will be rewarded once we prove that. In order to perform we need to have fun and be able to attract the best people. My start up experience has been mixed. Some people have been quite supportive. There is a wlot of free riding going on. Investors are used to getting information for free, because of the investment banking and real estate agent model, which arranges payment on transaction. We do not do transactions. The Dutch entrepreneurial culture is supportive. When I tell my German or French friends I have a mortgage, and I voluntary quit my job, they get very nervous. As a start-up there is nowhere to hide. There is no corporate brand or power that opens doors. You have to perform. Per capita cheese consumption correlates with Number of people who died by becoming tangled in their bedsheets A U T U M N 2 0 15 Correlation: 94,71% (r=0,947091) 800 deaths 33 lbs Cheese consumed Bedsheet tanglings Cheese consumed 31.5 lbs 600 deaths 30 lbs 400 deaths Bedsheet tanglings What are your ambitions for KR&A? We want to be the data authority of choice, for international real estate investors, developers and financiers. We want to remain unconflicted and align with real estate decision makers who What is the funniest correlation of researchdata you have come across? The US per capita cheese consumption has a 94.7% correlation with the number of people who died by becoming strangled in their bedsheets, in the period 2000 to 2009. 200 deaths 28.5 lbs 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Data sources: U.S. Department of Agriculture and Centers for Disease Control & Prevention 11 C HAN G ES IN PORT FOLI O Acquisition and private placement of redevelopment project in Düsseldorf Following its first Düsseldorf project, IBUS acquired and placed a second private placement together with its German development partner, fitis. This private placement consists of a former hospital and an apartment building in two desirable residential areas in Bilk and Unterbilk in Düsseldorf. Both buildings will be redeveloped into apartments, which will be sold individually. The Fund will have an expected term of around 3.5 years. More information on the project can be found at http://www.kronen-wohnen.de and http://www.gogrevestrasse.de Den Haag Opportunity Fund IBUS worked on a new residential opportunity fund in the summer, consisting of a residential portfolio with several retail units, near the centre of The Hague. The portfolio was offered in an auction process. After the equity had been placed with a small number of investors in a very short period of time, IBUS was overbid in the auction process by another bidder. Auction portfolio the Netherlands IBUS finalised the acquisition and placement of a private placement in October, investing in a mixed commercial use portfolio with buildings in the centre and south of the Netherlands. The portfolio was acquired from an auction process for EUR 12.5 million, all equity, which equals around 7x gross rental income. The private placement was established in a very short period of time, with a small group of high net worth investors. Our investment strategy is to optimize rental contracts and sell the buildings within the next three years. Disposal of apartment assets in the Rhineland area, Germany IBUS sold 82 apartment units in Mülheim, Germany in May 2015. The apartments were sold to private investors in the Mülheim area. The total sales price amounted to EUR 3.4 million including costs. The apartment units were part of the Rhineland portfolio, which holds assets in Mülheim and Remscheid. The remainder of the portfolio will be sold in the years to come. Asset Management for third parties IBUS was recently asked to give its opinion on a German office and retail portfolio for a large Anglo-Saxon investment manager. An investment quick scan was performed within a week, analysing the market, rents and yields for 12 properties in Berlin, Bonn, Dresden and Frankfurt. VGF Maastricht – Wyck IBUS is currently in the process of acquiring a retail and residential portfolio, consisting of nine high street retail properties with aboveground residential units in the picturesque shopping district of Wyck in Maastricht, alongside the main road between the railway station and the lively Vrijthof Square. After completing the acquisition process, the strategy will consist of lease optimization and an exit within a maximum of eight years. Subscription will be open to private investors, the minimum investment amount being EUR 100.000. For more information on participating in this private placement, please contact the IBUS office through info@ibus.nl or +31 (0)20 755 9000. Bergedorfer Strasse, Hamburg-Geesthacht, Germany Krijgsman 6 P.O. Box 8010 Pre-financing facility IBUS operates in very competitive markets. Transactions are usually successful when the buying party has been able to arrange its financing at a very early stage. In order to be able to compete in these markets, IBUS has set up a pre-financing facility for investors who can offer a bridging loan, for a very short period of time, in return for an attractive return, in order to facilitate the acquisition process. More information on this pre-financing facility can be obtained by contacting the IBUS office through info@ibus.nl or +31 (0)20 755 9000. 1180 LA Amstelveen IBUS to host Nyenrode workshop Following several workshops for High Net Worth investors and family offices between 2010 and 2015, IBUS and Nyenrode University (Centre for Wealth Management) organised a follow-up workshop on the topic of ‘What can private investors do better than institutional investors’. During the workshop, small groups will work on realistic cases and dilemmas based on this theme. Previous themes have included ‘Real estate as a necessary instrument for capital preservation’, ‘Real estate as an asset class for generations’ and ‘Social media: a threat or an opportunity for retail investments’. Participation in the workshop is by personal invitation only. The IBUS Company is an independent T. +31 (0)20-755 90 00 F. +31 (0)20-755 90 90 E-mail: info@ibus.nl www.ibus.nl Follow IBUS Asset Management on Linkedin group established in 1992 by Onno Husken, former Chief Executive Officer of Wereldhave N.V. and Kempen & Co. IBUS develops and invests in office, retail, residential and hotel properties in the United States, Europe and Asia. Since inception, 64 real estate funds, with a total investment consideration in excess of 1.6 billion, institutional investors. Over the years, more than half of these investments were successfully sold. IBUS also uses its real estate knowledge and experience to advise companies financial and institutions, institutional listed investors. These assignments are directed towards portfolio analysis, asset allocation policy, investment strategy and second opinions on direct and indirect real estate investments. IBUS is based in offices in Amstelveen (The Netherlands) and New York City (United States). 12 € have been introduced with private and