BNE-BNE2-Burhans20070038-R

advertisement
1
Supplementary Material: Neuronal Responding to a Novel Cue
Figure 9. Average integrated unit neuronal activity in the nucleus accumbens, anterior and
posterior cingulate cortex, and basolateral nucleus of the amygdala in controls (top panel) and
rabbits with ventral subicular lesions (bottom panel) during extinction in the original context
with a novel CS in place of the CS+ used during conditioning. The data, in the form of z-scores
normalized with respect to a 300-ms pre-CS baseline, are shown in 40 consecutive 10-ms
intervals after the onset of the novel CS (black bars) and CS (white bars). In controls, the
cingulate cortices and basolateral nucleus of the amygdala were significantly activated by the
presence of the novel CS, manifested as an enhanced responding to the novel CS relative to the
response to the CS. This enhancement was not seen in the nucleus accumbens of controls, but
interestingly, it was found in the nucleus accumbens of rabbits with lesions of the ventral
subiculum. Responding to the novel CS was unaffected by lesions in the remaining brain areas.
These findings were supported by significant individual comparisons following the analyses of
integrated activity (see Table 1). Consistent with our data, other studies have reported that the
cingulate cortices and amygdala play a role in the detection of novel stimuli in rabbits and other
species, including rodents, primates and humans (Burns, Annett, Kelley, Everitt, & Robbins,
1996; Downar, Crawley, Mikulis, & Davis, 2001; Gabriel, Poremba, Kang, Shenker, & Maren,
unpublished manuscript; Moses, Sutherland, & McDonald, 2002; Rutishauser, Mamelak, &
Schumna, 2006; Sparenborg & Gabriel, 1990; Wilson & Rolls, 1993; Zhu, Brown, McCabe, &
Aggleton, 1995). Previous work has also suggested that the interaction of amygdalar and ventral
subicular inputs in the nucleus accumbens may control behavioral responses to novel cues
(Burns et al., 1996). Based on evidence that hippocampal inputs to the nucleus accumbens can
gate amygdalar inputs (Groenewegen, Wright, Beijer, & Voorn, 1999; Mulder, Hodenpijl, &
2
Lopes da Silva, 1998), it is possible that the loss of ventral subicular inputs in rabbits with
lesions may allow amygdalar inputs to elicit more ample responses of nucleus accumbens
neurons to the novel CS.
References
Burns, L. H., Annett, L., Kelley, A. E., Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1996). Effects of lesions
to amygdala, ventral subiculum, medial prefrontal cortex, and nucleus accumbens on the
reaction to novelty: Implication for limbic-striatal interactions. Behavioral Neuroscience,
110, 60–73.
Downar, J., Crawley, A. P., Mikulis, D. J., & Davis, K. D. (2001). The effect of task relevance
on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: An event-related fMRI
study. NeuroImage, 14, 1256–1267.
Gabriel, M., Poremba, A., Kang, E., Shenker, J., & Maren, S. Dealing with the unexpected:
Multi-site hippocampal and cingulothalamic neuronal and field potential responses to
novel stimuli during rabbits’ performance of discriminative avoidance behavior.
Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois.
Groenewegen, H. J., Wright, C. I., Beijer, A. V., & Voorn, P. (1999). Convergence and
segregation of ventral striatal inputs and outputs. Trends in Neurosciences, 22, 561–567.
Moses, S. N., Sutherland, R. J., & McDonald, R. J. (2002). Differential involvement of amygdala
and hippocampus in responding to novel objects and contexts. Brain Research Bulletin,
58, 517–527.
Mulder, A. B., Hodenpijl, M. G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1998). Electrophysiology of the
hippocampal and amygdaloid projections to the nucleus accumbens of the rat:
3
Convergence, segregation, and interaction of inputs. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 5095–
5102.
Rutishauser, U., Mamelak, A. N., & Schuman, E. M. (2006). Single-trial learning of novel
stimuli by individual neurons of the human hippocampus-amygdala complex. Neuron,
49(6), 805–813.
Sparenborg, S., & Gabriel, M. (1990). Neuronal encoding of conditional stimulus duration in the
cingulate cortex and the limbic thalamus of rabbits. Behavioral Neuroscience, 104, 91933.
Wilson, F. A., & Rolls, E. T. (1993). The effects of stimulus novelty and familiarity on
neuronal activity in the amygdala of monkeys performing memory recognition tasks.
Experimental Brain Research, 93(3), 367–382.
Zhu, X. O., Brown, M. W., McCabe, B. J., & Aggleton, J. P. (1995). Effects of the novelty or
familiarity of visual stimuli on the expression of the immediate early gene c-fos in rat
brain. Neuroscience, 69, 821–829.
4
Table 1
Analysis of Variance for Neuronal Activity During Extinction
Area
Term
F
df
p
Nucleus accumbens
LTS
3.16
3, 66
< 0.04
Anterior cingulate cortex
LTSI
1.56
117, 2223
< 0.054
Posterior cingulate cortex
TSI
1.74
117, 2106
< 0.04
Basolateral amygdala
TSI
2.01
117, 1872
< 0.005
Note. L = lesion (control or lesion); T= training stage (reinforced trials, original context
extinction, novel context extinction, or novel CS extinction); S = stimulus (CS+/novel CS or
CS); I = 10-ms post-CS intervals following CS onset (40 levels).
5
Figure 9.
Download