Supporting Information for Shear degradation of molecular, crystalline and granular structure of starch during extrusion Ming Li, Jovin Hasjim, Fengwei Xie, Peter J. Halley and Robert G. Gilbert Table S1. Die pressure and temperature under different processing conditions.a No T P SS . WMS (°C) (%) (rpm) a NMS Pressure Temperature HAMS Pressure Temperature Pressure Temperature (bar) (°C) (bar) (°C) (bar) (°C) 1 105 30 70 11.8 ± 3.4 80.1 ± 0.1 19.4 ± 1.7 80.5 ± 0.0 46.9 ± 3.4 80.5 ± 0.8 2 105 30 130 9.6 ± 0.7 82.1 ± 0.4 17.4 ± 3.7 81.1 ± 0.2 29.8 ± 4.9 81.5 ± 0.5 3 105 40 70 3.4 ± 0.3 80.7 ± 0.4 8.5 ± 2.1 80.7 ± 0.1 17.0 ± 3.0 80.2 ± 0.1 4 105 40 130 4.7 ± 0.7 80.0 ± 0.1 7.6 ± 1.7 83.4 ± 0.1 16.8± 0.6 81.0 ± 0.2 5 135 30 70 9.8 ± 2.3 82.3 ± 0.3 14.8 ± 3.1 83.8 ± 0.8 43.3 ± 0.8 83.0 ± 0.1 6 135 30 130 7.5 ± 1.1 82.1 ± 0.2 12.7 ± 1.0 83.5 ± 0.4 33.8 ± 1.6 81.9 ± 0.1 7 135 40 70 3.3 ± 0.3 81.0 ± 0.5 7.4 ± 0.7 83.8 ± 0.2 19.3 ± 1.7 80.3 ± 0.1 8 135 40 130 1.8 ± 0.4 81.0 ± 0.4 5.4 ± 0.4 83.4 ± 0.5 15.0 ± 0.9 82.1 ± 0.3 T = processing temperature (the highest temperature to represent the temperature setting), P = plasticizer content (based on the total weight of starch mixture), numbers in the table are means ± standard deviation. 1 Starch gelatinization with limited plasticizer content Native waxy or high-amylose starch was premixed with 30 or 40% plasticizer (ratio of glycerol to water is 2:3) and sealed in a plastic bag overnight for equilibrating. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 1, Mettler-Toledo Inc., Columbus, US) was used to analyze starch gelatinization temperature. Melting point and enthalpy of indium were used for temperature and heat capacity calibration. Starch mixture (~5 mg) was placed in high pressure pan with gold seal. The slow heating rate of 5 ºC min-1 was used to minimize any temperature lag due to the large mass of the high pressure pan. Table S2. Starch gelatinization temperature with limited plasticizer contents.a Plasticizer To Tp Tc content (ºC) (ºC) (ºC) (%) Waxy maize starch 30 149 ± 8 160 ± 6 172 ± 3 Waxy maize starch 40 114 ± 1 135 ± 2 147 ± 5 High-amylose maize starch 40 190 ± 4 203 ± 3 213 ± 4 a To, onset temperature; Tp, peak temperature; Tc, endset temperature. Mean ± SD from at least three measurements. The highest processing temperature along the barrel was 135°C, which was lower than the starch gelatinization temperature at the plasticizer contents used in the present study (30-40%). The gelatinization temperature is higher at lower plasticizer content, which is consistent with those reported by others [1]. 2 The effect of the cleavage of molecular branches during extrusion on the reduction of whole molecular size Taking waxy maize starch (~100% amylopectin) as an example, under the assumption that every successful cleavage of an α-(1⟶4) glycosidic bond, i.e. the cleavage of a linear branch in a molecule, results in two smaller molecules of equal size, the ratio of the molecular weight of a degraded amylopectin molecule in extrudate to that of an intact, undegraded amylopectin molecule in native starch can be used to estimate the number of cleaved glycosidic bonds: Mextrudate 1 n Mnative = 2 (1) Here n is the number of subsequent cleavages of glycosidic bonds in a molecule of molecular weight M. Ten subsequent cleavages of α-(1⟶4) glycosidic bonds in an amylopectin molecule in native starch will result in about a thousandth of its original molecular weight, which is a substantial reduction of the molecular weight. Hence the number of cleaved amylopectin branches is much smaller than the total number of branches in an amylopectin molecule (around 104), resulting in no apparent changes in the SEC weight distribution of debranched starch (Level 1 structure) after extrusion. As there is no unique relationship between the Vh and the molecular weight of branched molecules, and the molecular weight of degraded amylopectin is not determined in the present study, the estimation of the number of subsequent cleavages of glycosidic bonds was not performed. Reference [1] Liu, H., Yu, L., Xie, F., Chen, L., Gelatinization of cornstarch with different amylose/amylopectin content. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 65, 357-363. 3