Unconditionally Stable Loop Design of Voltage-Mode Controlled Synchronous Buck Converter, Part 1 By: Peyman Asadi, Amir Rahimi, and Parviz Parto, International Rectifier Co. Design of voltage-mode controlled synchronous-buck converter can result to a conditionally stable loop using conventional compensation-design methods. In such cases, the compensator provides the desired loop bandwidth with good stability margin at nominal operating point while load transient response indicates a robust performance of the converter. However, the control loop becomes unstable at certain conditions such as the drop of input voltage. To avoid these undesired situations, the compensation network is usually modified to achieve unconditional stability. The demand for wide input-voltage, high-frequency non-isolated synchronous buck converters has rapidly increased in recent years. It is desired to design wide control loop bandwidth for this converter to benefit the high frequency operation and minimize the number of output capacitors. However, it is possible a wide loop-bandwidth design to be conditionally stable. Even though the problem of conditionally stable converters is not new among power electronics engineers, it can be ignored during application development and evaluation since common stability metrics such as phase margin and load transient response at nominal condition do not reveal it. This article reviews the problem of conditionally stable loop design of single phase voltage-mode controlled non-isolated synchronous buck converter with examples and provides some design guidelines to achieve unconditional stability. I. Introduction Constant frequency and low-noise operation of voltage-mode-controlled PWM scheme makes it the popular candidate for high-performance non-isolated buck converter. In this scheme a compensator network is required to achieve robust stability, good load and line regulation, and 1 fast response to dynamic load variation. The compensator is usually implemented with an Error/Amplifier and a network of Resistors and Capacitors (Figure 1) [Reference 1]. Fig. 1. Buck converter with voltage-mode controlled PWM Scheme using error amplifier. Depending on the relative location of the zero of output capacitors (Fz0), switching frequency (Fs), and desired closed loop bandwidth (Fo) different types of compensation networks are commonly used as summarized in Table 1. Table 1 - The compensation type and location of zero crossover frequency. Compensator Type Type II: (PI) Type III-A: (PID) Type III-B: (PID) Relative location of Fo, Fz0, and Fs Fz0 Fo FS / 2 Fo Fz0 FS / 2 Fo FS / 2 Fz0 Output Capacitor Type Electrolytic POS-Cap Ceramic Details of compensation network design are explained in many references such as AN-1162 from International Rectifier [1]. The implementation of Type II and Type III A/B compensator circuits using voltage mode are shown in Figure 2. In brief, both compensators behave as an integrator in 2 low frequencies to assure zero steady-state error. The output filter of the converter is usually an LC filter, which creates a 180 degree phase lag in addition to 90 phase lag of the integrator. Thus, to achieve good phase margin, one or two zeros (i.e., one for Type II and two for Type IIIA/B) are placed below and close to the zero crossover frequency of the gain (i.e., Fo). The zero(s) of the compensator plus the zero of output capacitor(s) usually provide enough boost to the phase of loop to keep it above -180 degree at every frequency below Fo. However, in some applications the location of compensator zero(s) and/or output capacitor(s) zero are far from the resonance frequency of output LC filter (FLC). Consequently, the phase of loop drops to below -180 for a range of frequencies less than Fo and then reaches again above -180 at Fo. In this case, if the loop gain drops to 0 db at zero crossover frequency of the phase, the loop becomes unstable. Thus, the converter is called conditionally stable. In general, a loop design that guarantees unconditional stability is preferred. A straightforward way to avoid conditional loop design is either dropping Fo or placing the compensator zero(s) around FLC. P Vout 2 Rf1 Rc1 -- Vout Cc2 Rf1 Cf3 Cc1 Rf3 Z1 -- Z1 Ve -- P1=0 Integration by Cc1 Integrator Gain= 1/ (Rf1.Cc1) Magnitude (db) Vp Magnitude (db) Cc1 -- -Vp Z2 Rf2 P1=0 Integration by Cc1 1/ Integrator Gain= (Rf1.Cc1) Cc2 Rc1 P3 Ve -- Rf2 P2 FZ1 FP2 (a) Type II Compensator Fig. 2. FZ1 FZ2 Log(f) FP2 FP3 Log(f) (b) Type III A/B compensator Type II and TYPE III-A/B compensators with asymptotic gain 3 Two situations that can result to conditionally stable loop are demonstrated as examples in Figure 3 and Figure 4. More details on the performance of a conditionally stable converter and design 80 120 70 105 60 90 50 75 40 60 30 45 Increase of Fz0 20 30 10 15 0 Phase (Degree) Gain (db) guidelines to achieve unconditional stability are given with an example in succeeding sections. 0 Negative Phase Range -10 -15 -20 1 Frequency (kHz) Magnitude Fz0=10kHz Phase Fz0=10kHz Magnitude Fz0=20kHz Phase Fz0=20kHz Magnitude Fz0=30kHz Phase Fz0=30kHz 60 160 45 120 30 80 15 40 Increase of Fo 0 0 Phase (Degree) Frequency response of a converter with Type II compensator, where the Fz0 varies from 10 kHz to 30 kHz. Gain (db) Fig. 3. -30 100 10 Negative Phase Range -15 -40 -30 1 10 Magnitude Fo=120kHz Phase Fo=120kHz Fig. 4. Frequency (kHz) 100 Magnitude Fo=150kHz Phase Fo=150kHz -80 1,000 Magnitude Fo=180kHz Phase Fo=180kHz Frequency response of a converter with Type III-B compensator, where the target bandwidth is changing from 120 kHz to 180 kHz. 4 Figure 3 shows the frequency response of a converter with Type II compensator, where Fo is designed for 75 kHz and FLC equals to 3 kHz*. The zero of the output capacitors (Fz0) is located at about 10 kHz. The compensator has a zero at 0.75 times of FLC, the first pole at 0 Hz, and the second pole at 300 kHz (i.e., Fs/2). The location of Fz0 varies due to manufacturing tolerances, aging, ambient temperature, and addition of bypass ceramic capacitors on the output of converter. Assuming for this example, Fz0 changes from 10 kHz to 30 kHz, the bandwidth drops from 75 kHz to 34 kHz and the phase margin decreases from 80 to above 45. Although the loop is stable with more than 45 phase margin at Fz0 equal to 30 kHz, the phase drops below zero about 4 kHz to 5 kHz frequency range. Thus, the loop becomes conditionally stable. Application engineer can either drop the loop bandwidth or select a Type III-A compensator such that unconditional stability would be achieved. In another example with ceramic output capacitors and 1 MHz switching frequency, a Type III-B is used and the compensator is changed to achieve bandwidth of 120 kHz to 180 kHz (Figure 4). Even though all of the designs guarantee a phase margin of over 55, the minimum phase gets negative for the 180 kHz design. * In this picture and following ones, the phase of loop includes the 180 degree inversion by negative feedback. Thus, phase of above zero is desired for unconditional stability. 5