Jeong et al. Supplementary Data: Weekly EZN

advertisement
Jeong et al.
Supplementary Data: Weekly EZN-2208 (PEGylated SN-38) in Combination with
Bevacizumab in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors
Woondong Jeong, Sook Ryun Park, Annamaria Rapisarda, Nicole Fer, Robert J. Kinders, Alice
Chen, Giovanni Melillo, Baris Turkbey, Seth M. Steinberg, Peter Choyke, James H. Doroshow,
Shivaani Kummar*
*Corresponding Author: E-mail: kummars@mail.nih.gov
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
and Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
HIF-1α immunoassay
Methods for specimen collection and processing to preserve HIF-1α in 18-gauge tumor needle
biopsies have been validated and a modified version of the DUOSet IC ELISA Kit from R&D
Systems was validated to quantitatively measure HIF-1α levels in human tissue biopsy [1].
Core needle biopsies (18-gauge) were immediately dry flash frozen and stored at -80°C. At the
time of the assay, samples were thawed in 250 µL nitrogen-purged extraction buffer containing
protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma-Aldrich),
and the prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor 2-hydroxyglutarate (3B Scientific Corporation), which
stabilizes HIF-1 protein. Cells were lysed using Precellys 2.8 mm ceramic bead tubes and the
Precellys24 tissue homogenizer; protein content was determined using the BCA protein assay kit
(Thermo Scientific). A minimum lysate concentration of 0.5 µg/µL was needed to proceed with
the assay. For the immunoassay, 100 µL of DUOSet capture antibody at a concentration of 4
1
Jeong et al.
µg/mL (Lot# KQE0411012) in 1x PBS was added to each well of a 96-well white microtiter
plate and incubated at 2°C-8°C for 16±1 h. Wells were blocked with 300 µL Reagent Diluent
(1x PBS, 0.05% Tween 20, 5% bovine serum albumin) at 24°C for 1-2 h. DUOSet HIF-1α
standard was serially diluted in Reagent Diluent to a range of 7.8 to 1000pg HIF-1α/mL and
served as standard controls. HIF-1α standards or controls were loaded in 100 µL total volume
with Reagent Diluent; clinical samples were loaded in triplicate at 5, 7.5, and 10 µL cell extract
diluted in Reagent Diluent per well onto each plate and incubated at 2°C-8°C for 16±1 h. Next,
100 µL/well of DUOSet HIF-1α detection antibody (100 ng/mL, Lot# KKR0311012) in Reagent
Diluent was added and incubated at 24°C for 2 h. Then 100 µL/well DUOSet streptavidinhorseradish peroxidase conjugate (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) at a final concentration of 5 µg/mL
(1:200, Lot# 1260918) in Reagent Diluent was added and incubated at 24°C for 30 min. Finally,
100 µL/well of room temperature LumiGLO Chemiluminescent Substrate (KPL) was added and
the plate immediately read on a Tecan Infinite M200 plate reader (Tecan Systems, San Jose,
CA). Relative light unit values were plotted using a HIF-1α analysis template to generate
standard curves. Average HIF-1α level, standard deviation, and CV for each tumor extract were
determined from the HIF-1α standard curve. Final HIF-1α readout for each sample was reported
as pg HIF-1α per 1 μg total protein using the HIF-1α standard curve.
RNA extraction and real-time PCR analysis
After collection, tumor biopsy samples were submerged in RNAlater RNA Stabilization Reagent
(Qiagen), kept at 4°C for 24 hours, and then stored at -20°C. Samples were subsequently
disrupted and homogenized in RNA Lysis Buffer (RNeasy Mini Kit, Qiagen) using FastPrep
(Lysing Matrix D columns, MP Biomedicals). Total RNA was extracted according to the
2
Jeong et al.
manufacturer's procedure. Genomic DNA was digested using RNase-Free DNAse Set (Qiagen)
during RNA extraction. RNA integrity was evaluated using RNA 6000 Nano Assay in an
Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). RT-PCR was carried out using an RT-PCR
kit (PE Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's procedure. Expression of VEGF, GLUT-1,
HK2, PDK1 and CA9 were assessed by real-time PCR using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System
(Applied Biosystems). Typically, 5 ng of reverse-transcribed cDNA per sample was used to
conduct real-time PCR in triplicate samples. Primers and probes used are listed below in
Supplementary Table S1. Detection of 18S rRNA, used as internal control, was carried out using
premixed reagents from Applied Biosystems. Detection of VEGF and 18S rRNA was carried
out using TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), whereas GLUT-1, HK2,
PDK1 and CA9 detection was carried out using Sybr Green PCR Master Mix (Applied
Biosystems). Values are expressed as percent change relative to pretreatment samples for each
patient.
DCE-MRI Technique
Imaging was performed by using a 1.5-T MR system (Philips Achieva, The Best, The
Netherlands) with a dedicated receive-only six-channel phased array coil. First, the diagnostic
T2-weighted images, that were used to locate the target tumor, were obtained using (TR/TE)
4600/100 msec, a section thickness of 6 mm, 400 mm field of view, and a matrix of 320x320.
Next, the unenhanced T1-weighted images, used to determine the tissue T1 map, were acquired
with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient- echo sequence by using (TR/TE) 9/3.6 msec, a 5° flip
angle, 5 mm-thick sections, 400 mm field of view, and a matrix of 256x256. Finally, DCE-MR
images were obtained with a three-dimensional spoiled gradient- echo sequence using (TR/TE)
3
Jeong et al.
9/3.6msec, a 15° flip angle, 5-mm-thick sections through the entire target lesion, 400 mm field of
view, an acquisition time of 30 seconds per data set, and a matrix of 256x256. After three
baseline unenhanced image acquisitions, an automatic injector (Medrad Spectris, Indianola, PA)
was used to intravenously infuse gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Bayer Healthcare
Pharmaceuticals, Wayne, NJ) at 0.3 mL/sec, for a total of 0.1 mmol per kilogram of body weight
(typically 15–20 mL), followed by a 50-mL normal saline flush. Continuous 30-second imaging
data sets were obtained before, during, and after administration of the contrast medium for a total
of 8 minutes to result in 23 repeated data sets. Patients were asked to hold their breath during
MR image acquisitions.
DCE-MRI Analysis
Data from DCE-MRI were analysed using a computer-based 2-compartment model based on the
Kety model, which has also been termed the general kinetic model (GKM) [2]. GKM
incorporates an arterial input function derived from aortic measurements and a T1 map for
converting signal intensity to gadolinium concentration. It is based on a 2-compartment model
that assumes that the vascular space is in rapid equilibrium with the extravascular, extracellular
space and further assumes a rapid water exchange between intra- and extracellular water. GKM
analysis was performed in an IDL-based (Interactive Data Language; Research Systems Inc.,
Boulder, CO) research tool (Cine Tool, GE Healthcare). Region-of-interest measurements were
obtained from one selected target lesion in each patient. Two parameters derived from the curve
fitting GKM algorithm were used to perform the quantitative analysis: Ktrans, the forward contrast
transfer rate, kep, the reverse contrast transfer rate.
4
Jeong et al.
References
1.
Park SR, Kinders RJ, Khin S, Hollingshead M, Parchment RE, Tomaszewski JE,
Doroshow JH (2012)Validation and fitness testing of a quantitative immunoassay for HIF-1
alpha in biopsy specimens [abstract]. Cancer Res. 72: 3616
2.
Kety SS (1951) The theory and applications of the exchange of inert gas at the lungs and
tissues. Pharmacol. Rev. 3: 1-41
5
Jeong et al.
Table S1.
Primer name
Sequence
VEGF forward
TACCTCCACCATGCCAAGTG
VEGF reverse
ATGATTCTGCCCTCCTCCTTC
GLUT-1 forward
GATCCTGGGCCGCTTCAT
GLUT-1 reverse
ACATGGGCACGAAGCCTG
HK2 forward
TCTCAGAGCGGCTCAAGACA
HK2 reverse
GGTGCTCTCAAGCCCTAAGTGT
PDK1 forward
CAAGAATGCAATGAGAGCCACTA
PDK1 reverse
CCAGCGTGACATGAACTTGAA
CA9 forward
ACATGGGCACGAAGCCTG
CA9 reverse
AACTGCTCATAGGCACTGTTTTCTT
6
Download