ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN
Bachelor in English as a Foreign Language
Advanced English II - 551014
EVALUATION FORMAT FOR THE ALL THE COURSE ACTIVITIES
MOMENT 1: INITIAL EVALUATION- COURSE RECOGNITION
EVALUATED ITEM
Purpose of the
Assignment
Interpretative
competence
Argumentative
competence
Writing English
competence
(spelling and
grammar)
LOW SCORE
MEDIUM SCORE
HIGH SCORE
The student didn’t
accomplish with the
expected goal and the
PDF document is poor;
or didn’t send the
work.
The student accomplished
some requirements
according to the proposed
activity and recognized
some learning
environments.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 3)
The student definitely
demonstrated difficult
to identify the learning
environments and
recognize the
appropriate linguistic
structures and
vocabulary to
comment your
childhood memories.
(Points= 0)
The student had some
difficulties to recognize
the learning environments
and some appropriate
linguistic structures and
vocabulary to comment
your childhood memories.
The student
demonstrated
difficulty to argue
clearly the ideas about
his/her childhood
memories
(Points = 0)
The student did not give
clear explanations on the
most important aspects
about his/her childhood
memories.
The student had a lot
of grammar,
vocabulary and
spelling mistakes in
the PDF File.
The student had some
problems associated to
grammar, spelling and
vocabulary mistakes in
the PDF File.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 4)
(Points = 4)
(Points = 3)
The student
accomplished all
objectives, identified
the learning
environments and
described his or her
life in the past with
accuracy and
consistency.
(Points = 5)
The student
demonstrated ability to
recognize and identify
clearly the learning
environments and the
most appropriate
linguistic structures
and vocabulary to
comment your
childhood memories.
(Points = 7)
The student explained
with details the most
important aspects
about his/her
childhood memories.
MAXIMUM
SCORE
5
7
8
(Points = 8)
The contributions in
the PDF file were well
written in English
language with correct
use of vocabulary,
spelling and grammar.
5
(Points = 5)
TOTAL OF THE MOMENT 1:
25
MOMENT 2: EXPRESSING WISHES AND REGRETS – COLLABORATIVE FORUM
EVALUATED ITEM
Purpose of the
Assignment
Activity
socialization
and group
interaction
Interpretative
Competence
Argumentative
Competence
Propositive
Competence
LOW SCORE
MEDIUM SCORE
HIGH SCORE
The assignment didn’t
fulfill the requirements
established in the
guidelines. Student
had difficulty
understanding the
questions and topics
that were being
discussed; or didn’t
send the activity
(Points = 0)
The student accomplished
some requirements
according to the proposed
activity. The student had
some difficulties to
understand the topics that
were being discussed.
The student did not
socialize his document
and didn’t comment
the partners’ works.
The student socialized his
work, but didn´t
contribute to your
partners’ works or the
student contributed
meaningfully to your
partners’ works, but
didn’t socialize your own
assignment.
(Points= 5)
The student had some
difficulties to recognize or
understand the
information about the
topic proposed.
The student socialized
his document, gave
meaningful feedback
about his partners’
contributions and
promoted
meaningfully the
interaction with the
other group members.
(Points= 10)
The student was able
to identify clearly and
understand the main
information about the
topic proposed.
(Points = 5 )
The student argued about
some points of view but
his or her opinions are not
clear.
(Points = 10 )
The student
demonstrated ability to
express his or her
points of view with
accuracy and
consistency.
(Points = 5)
(Points = 10)
(Points = 0)
The student definitely
had difficulties to
identify and
understand the
information about the
topic proposed; or
didn’t send the
activity.
(Points = 0)
The student
demonstrated difficult
to present different
points of view with
accuracy and
consistency; or didn’t
send the activity.
(Points = 0)
The student had
difficulty to synthesize
clearly his/her points
of view on problems
and solutions about
life stories; or didn’t
send the activity.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 7)
The student had a little
ability to synthesize
clearly his/her ideas on
problems and solutions
about life stories
(Points = 5)
The assignment
contains the
requirements
established in the
guidelines. The
content is fully
comprehensive and
accurate.
MAXIMUM
SCORE
13
(Points = 13)
The student was able
to propose different
points of view in order
to give solutions about
the life stories.
(Points = 10)
10
10
10
10
Writing English
competence
(spelling and
grammar)
Spoken English
competence
(Pronunciation
and fluency)
The student had a lot
of grammar,
vocabulary and
spelling mistakes in
the forum and in the
Prezi presentation.
The student had some
problems associated to
grammar, spelling and
vocabulary mistakes in
the forum and in the Prezi
presentation.
(Points = 0)
Pronunciation was
very unclear and
difficult to understand.
Student took a long
time to say ideas. A lot
of unnatural pauses
and hesitations.
(Points = 5)
The pronunciation was
slightly unclear at times,
but generally is fair.
Speech is slow and often
hesitant and irregular.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 6)
The contributions in
the forum and the
Prezi presentation
were well written in
English language with
correct use of
vocabulary, spelling
and grammar
(Points = 10)
Pronunciation was
very clear and easy to
understand. Student
was able to
communicate with no
hesitation, and no trace
of unusually long
pauses or hesitation.
(Points = 12)
TOTAL OF THE MOMENT 2:
10
12
75 Points
MOMENT 3: DESCRIBING DIFFERENT CUSTOMS – SPOKEN TASK
EVALUATED ITEM
Purpose of the
Assignment
Activity
socialization
and group
interaction
Vocabulary
LOW SCORE
MEDIUM SCORE
The assignment didn’t
fulfill the requirements
established in the
guidelines. Student
had difficulty
understanding the
questions and topics
that were being
discussed.
(Points = 0)
The student accomplished
some requirements
according to the proposed
activity. The student had
some difficulties to
understand the topics that
were being discussed.
The student did not
socialize his
assignment and didn’t
comment the partners’
works.
The student socialized his
work, but didn´t
contribute to your
partners’ works or the
student contributed
meaningfully to your
partners’ works, but
didn’t socialize your own
assignment.
(Points= 8)
Student was able to use
broad vocabulary words
but was lacking, making
him/her repetitive and
cannot expand on his/her
ideas.
(Points = 10)
(Points = 0)
Student had
inadequate vocabulary
words to express
his/her ideas properly,
which hindered the
students in responding.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 10)
HIGH SCORE
The assignment
contains the
requirements
established in the
guidelines. The
content is fully
comprehensive and
accurate.
MAXIMUM
SCORE
20
(Points = 20)
The student socialized
his assignment, gave
meaningful feedback
about his partners’
contributions and
promoted
meaningfully the
interaction with the
other group members.
(Points= 15)
Student had a rich,
precise and impressive
usage of vocabulary
words learned.
(Points = 20)
15
20
Spoken English
competence
(Pronunciation
and fluency)
The speech on the
video has lots of
mistakes in terms of
fluency, intonation,
use of vocabulary and
appropriate grammar
structures.
(Points = 0 )
The speech on the video
has some problems
associated to content,
fluency, intonation, use of
vocabulary and
appropriate grammar
structures.
(Points = 10)
The speech on the
video is really good in
terms of fluency,
intonation, use of
vocabulary and
appropriate grammar
structures.
(Points = 20)
TOTAL OF THE MOMENT 3:
20
75
MOMENT 4: TALKING ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS – COLLABORATIVE
FORUM
EVALUATED ITEM
Blog’s
information and
design
Activity
socialization
and group
interaction
Interpretative
Competence
Argumentative
Competence
LOW SCORE
MEDIUM SCORE
HIGH SCORE
The group didn’t
design the asked blog,
or it didn’t fulfill the
requirements
established in terms of
the contents.
(Points = 0)
The group designed the
asked blog, but it didn’t
fulfill the requirements
established in terms of
the contents.
The group designed the
asked blog and it had the
requirements established
in terms of the contents.
(Points = 7)
(Points = 13)
The student did not
socialize his document
and didn’t comment
the partners’ works.
The student socialized
his work, but didn´t
contribute to your
partners’ works or the
student contributed
meaningfully to your
partners’ works, but
didn’t socialize your
own document.
The student socialized
his document, gave
meaningful feedback
about his partners’
contributions and
promoted meaningfully
the interaction with the
other group members.
(Points = 0)
(Points= 5)
(Points= 10)
The student definitely
had difficulties to
identify and
understand the
information about the
topic proposed.
(Points = 0)
The student had some
difficulties to recognize
or understand the
information about the
topic proposed.
The student was able to
identify clearly and
understand the main
information about the
topic proposed.
(Points = 5)
(Points = 10)
The student
demonstrated difficult
to argue about some
environmental
problem in his/her
region or city.
(Points = 0)
The student argued
about some
environmental problem
in his/her region or city.
The student could argue
with clear ideas different
environmental problems
in his/her region or city.
(Points = 5)
(Points = 10)
MAXIMUM
SCORE
13
10
10
10
Propositive
Competence
Writing English
competence
(spelling and
grammar)
Spoken English
competence
(Pronunciation
and fluency)
The student had
difficulty to synthesize
clearly his/her ideas
about some
environmental
problem in his/her
region or city.
The student had a little
ability to synthesize
clearly his/her ideas
about some about some
environmental problem
in his/her region or city.
The student was able to
plan collaboratively the
design of a proposal
about some
environmental problem
in his/her region or city.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 5)
(Points = 10)
The student had a lot
of grammar,
vocabulary and
spelling mistakes in
the forum and in the
blog’s information.
The student had some
problems associated to
grammar, spelling and
vocabulary mistakes in
the forum and in the
blog’s information.
The contributions in the
forum and the blog’s
information were well
written in English
language with correct
use of vocabulary,
spelling and grammar
(Points = 0)
(Points = 5)
(Points = 10)
Pronunciation was
very unclear and
difficult to understand.
Student took a long
time to say ideas. A lot
of unnatural pauses
and hesitations.
The pronunciation was
slightly unclear at times,
but generally is fair.
Speech is slow and often
hesitant and irregular.
Pronunciation was very
clear and easy to
understand. Student was
able to communicate
with no hesitation, and
no trace of unusually
long pauses or
hesitation.
(Points = 0)
(Points = 6 )
(Points = 12)
TOTAL OF THE MOMENT 4
10
10
12
75
MOMENT 5: DILEMMAS - APPLICATION OF THE WHOLE COURSE CONTENTS: FINAL
EVALUATION
EVALUATED ITEM
Purpose of the
assignment
LOW SCORE
The assignment
didn’t fulfill the
requirements
established in the
guidelines in terms
of the contents; or
didn’t send the
activity.
(Points = 0)
MEDIUM SCORE
The student
accomplished some
requirements
according to the
proposed activity.
The student had some
difficulties to
understand the topics
that were being
discussed.
(Points = 13)
HIGH SCORE
The assignment
contains the
requirements
established in the
guidelines. The
content is fully
comprehensive and
accurate.
(Points = 25)
MAXIMUM
SCORE
25
Interpretative
competence
Argumentative
competence
Propositive
competence
Writing English
competence
(spelling and
grammar)
Spoken English
competence
(Pronunciation
and fluency)
The student
definitely had
difficulties to
identify and
understand the
information about
the topic proposed;
or didn’t send the
activity.
(Points = 0)
The student
demonstrated
difficult to present
different points of
view with accuracy
and consistency; or
didn’t send the
activity.
(Points = 0)
The student
demonstrated
difficulty to
synthesize clearly
his/her points of
view about the topic
proposed.
(Points = 0)
The student had a lot
of grammar,
vocabulary and
spelling mistakes in
the Power point
presentation.
The student had some
difficulties to
recognize or
understand the
information about the
topic proposed.
The student was able
to identify clearly and
understand the main
information about the
topic proposed.
20
(Points = 10)
The student argued
about some points of
view but his or her
opinions are not clear.
(Points = 20)
The student
demonstrated ability
to express his or her
points of view with
accuracy and
consistency.
20
(Points = 10)
The student had a
little ability to
synthesize clearly
his/her points of view
about the topic
proposed.
(Points = 20)
The student was able
to synthesize clearly
his/her points of view
about the topic
proposed.
(Points = 10)
The student had some
problems associated to
grammar, spelling and
vocabulary mistakes
in the Power point
presentation. .
(Points = 20)
The contributions in
the in the Power point
presentation were well
written in English
language with correct
use of vocabulary,
spelling and grammar.
(Points = 0)
Pronunciation was
very unclear and
difficult to
understand. Student
took a long time to
say ideas. A lot of
unnatural pauses and
hesitations.
(Points = 10)
The pronunciation
was slightly unclear at
times, but generally is
fair. Speech is slow
and often hesitant and
irregular.
(Points = 0 )
(Points = 10 )
(Points = 20)
Pronunciation was
very clear and easy to
understand. Student
was able to
communicate with no
hesitation, and no
trace of unusually
long pauses or
hesitation.
(Points = 20)
TOTAL OF THE MOMENT 5
20
20
20
125