Title: THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE, AND DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS IN THE READING COMPREHENSION OF ADULT NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS OF ENGLISH ENROLLED IN ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES COURSES Problem Statement: This study will investigate the cognitive, affective, and demographic factors that affect the reading comprehension of adult non-native speakers on English who are enrolled in college English for Academic Purposes courses. Purpose: Nonnative speakers of English who are enrolled in English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses must take the placement test required by the State of Florida upon completion of the EAP course sequence before entering college-level studies. The College Placement Test (CPT) was used until the 2011-1, the CPT or the Postsecondary Education Readiness Test (P.E.R.T.) in 2011-1, and the P.E.R.T. exclusively from 2011-2 on. Available data indicates that the percentage of students who are exempt from further remediation in reading after taking the reading subtest is around 50%, while the percentage of students who are exempt from further remediation in writing after taking the writing subtest is over 60%. For instance, in 2008-2, 555 level 6 EAP students took the College Placement Test at Miami Dade College. Of the 401 EAP level 6 students who took all three subtests (reading, writing, and mathematics), 129 (32.2%) passed all three subsections; thus, the majority (76.8%) needed further remediation in at least one area. Exempt from further remediation were 49.5% of EAP students in reading, 60.2% in writing, and 58.5% in mathematics. Of the seven level 5 students who attempted to take the CPT test early in 2008-2, only two (28.6%) passed 0the reading portion. Of the nine who took the writing portion, seven (77.8%) passed, and of the eleven who attempted the mathematics portion, six (54.5%) passed (Rodriguez, 2010). This study will make a contribution to one of the implementation goals of MDC3, the Miami Dade College-specific Completion by Design initiative, is to "[d]esign an English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and Developmental Education curriculum that will serve as a more efficient "on ramp" to college-level programs of study" (MDC3 Newsletter). Various factors that predict foreign language achievement have been investigated over the years; however, Gardner et al. (1197) stated that "there is a lack of research examining the relationships among all those variables simultaneously" (p. 344) Criterion variable: P.E.R.T. Reading subtest score (or some other measure of reading comprehension) Predictor variables: Cognitive: * Academic achievement (GPA) * L1 literacy (reading) * English proficiency * Years of prior education in home country (may be demographic) * Lg. of prior education in home country (native lg, English, other lg.) (may be demographic) * Years of formal study of English (may be demographic) * Expectation of achievement in the course Affective: * Lg. anxiety * Perceived scholastic competence * Perceived intellectual ability * Test anxiety Demographic: * Gender * Age * Semester course load * Work load * Use of English outside of school Personality----maybe * Level of cooperativeness * Individualism References Gardner, R.C., Tremblay, P.F., & Masgoret, A.M. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 81. 344-362 Onwuegbuzie, A., Bailey, P., Daley, C. (2000). Cognitive, Affective, Personality, and DEmographic Predictors of Foreign-Language Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 94 (1). 3-15. Rodriguez, S. (2010). CPT Results for Students Enrolled in Level 5 & 6 EAP Courses. Institutional Research, Miami Dade College. Retrieved November 26, 2010 from http://www.mdc.edu/ir/iremployees/2010-001_CPT-Level5&6.pdf MDC3, Miami Dade College (2012). MDC3 Newsletter: May 21, 2012 Issue