PARAMETRICAL REGULATION OF ECONOMIC GROWTH BASED ON THE TURNOVSKY MONETARY MODEL Abdykappar A. Ashimov, Bahyt T. Sultanov, Zheksenbek M. Adilov, Yuriy V. Borovskiy, Dauren K. Suissinbayev, Askar A. Ashimov Kazakh National Technical University 050013, Almaty, 22 Satpayev Str, Republic of Kazakhstan Email: ashimov37@mail.ru, yuborovskiy@gmail.com, daurensmail@gmail.com ABSTRACT The work presents the application results of the parametrical regulation theory in the sphere of economic growth based on the Turnovsky monetary model. We present the results of the solution to the problem of parametrical identification of the considered model. The evaluation of a weak structural stability of the Turnovsky model in the compact domain of the phase space was obtained. Optimal (in sense of the criterion characterizing an economic growth) values of regulated parameters of the model and the dependence of a criterion’s optimal values on the two unregulated parameters were found. KEY WORDS Πptimal control, nonlinear systems, modelling and simulation, parametrical regulation. 1. Introduction The national economy interacting with economic systems of other different countries is quite a difficult object to manage. Today the issues of government regulation of the national economy evolution (economic growth) are considered on the basis of macroeconomic mathematical models, basically applying the scenario approach. During the scenario approach to the development of national economic policy on the basis of the selected model, the scenario variants are iterated applying different sets of economic tools (parameters regulated by the government) and applying the analysis of the obtained corresponding solutions of the examined model [10, 11]. Thus in the known literature and practice there are no scientific propositions of parametrical regulation of market economy development that meets the requirements of optimality of the state’s economic system evolution and the recommendations for the development and implementation of effective state economic policy. A lot of dynamic systems, including the country's economic system, after some transformations can be represented by systems of nonlinear ordinary differential equations containing in its right-hand side vectors of regulated (controlled) (π’) parameters and vectors of unregulated parameters(disturbances) (λ) as well. As it is known, the solution (evolution) of the examined system of the differential equations depends on the vector of initial values of the system and on the values of π’ and λ vectors as well. Therefore, the result of evolution (development) of a nonlinear dynamic system with a given vector of initial values is determined by the values of vectors of both regulated and unregulated parameters. Also it is known [8] that we can judge by the solution of the dynamic systems about the object it describes, if the system has the property of immutability of the qualitative picture of the trajectory, when there are small in some sense perturbations of the right side of the system. In other words, a dynamic system must be robust, or structurally stable. Based on the aforesaid, in [2] – [5] we propose a theory of parametrical regulation of market economy development (the effectiveness of which is shown on a number of applications). This paper examines the application of the theory of parametrical regulation to estimate the optimal values of parameters (tools) of public policy in the sphere of economic growth based on the Turnovsky monetary model. 2. Model description The Turnovsky monetary model [1] after some alterations (for the case of the scenario of economic development considered in [1], when a government deficit is completely financed by money when the stock of bonds per capita is fixed) is presented by the system of the following differential and algebraic equations. πΜ = π [π − π]; (1) πΜ = π − π’π¦ + π(ππ (1 − π’) + π) − (π + π)(π + π); (2) π§Μ = γ(1−π’) γ−1 π [ππ π§ − π π] + [ γ π§ ( − 1) + 1] γ(π ∗ − π) + γ−1 π π§−π ; (3) πΜ = γ(π ∗ − π); (4) π¦ = π΄π α ; (5) γ−1 ππ = π΄απ ∗ α−1 ; (6) π = π΄απ α−1 ; (7) π∗ = π¦−π[(π¦−π π)(1−π’)+ π+π§ [(1−π4 )π−π4 (π+π§)−π1 π¦+π3 π]+π§π−ππ]−ππ+π π2 ππ§ λ[ −π+1] π ; (8) π = λ(π ∗ − π) + ππ. (9) Here dot denotes the derivative with respect to time (t), measured in years. Output (endogenous) variables of the model: π – instantaneous expected rate of inflation (1/year); π – nominal per capita stock of outside money (tenge/person), tenge - national currency of Kazakhstan; π§ – real per capita volume of shares (tenge/person), (real indices here and in further are determined by the prices of the year of 2000); π – real capital-labor ratio (tenge/person); π¦ – real per capita output (tenge/(person*year)); ππ – real before-tax rate of return on securities (1/year); π – marginal real physical product of capital (tenge/(person*year2)); π ∗ – desires real per capita stock of capital (tenge/person); π – real per capita investments (tenge/(person*year)); Input (exogenous) time dependent variables of the model: π – consumer price index (1/year); π – real per capita government spending (tenge/(person*year)) (π > 0); π – rate of growth of population (1/year); γ – coefficient of the capital-labor ratio (1/year) (0 < πΎ < 1); π΄, α – coefficients of production function (π΄ > 0, 0 < πΌ < 1); π – share of real per capita consumption out of real disposable income (0 < πΌ < 1) (dimensionless); π1 , π2 , π3 , π4 – coefficients of real per capita demand for money equations (π1 > 0, π2 < 0, π3 > 0, 0 < π4 < 1) (dimensionless); λ – coefficient of per capita investment rate, λ > 0 (1/year); π’ – income tax rate, 0 < π’ < 1 (dimensionless); Input parameters of the model: π – nominal per capita stock of government; π > 0 (tenge/person). Input parameters of the model involve initial values (when π‘ = 0) of output variables of the dynamic equations of the model (1) – (4): π0 , π0 , π§0 , π0 . The values of input functions of the model at integer π‘ time values are also considered as input parameters of the model. All input functions of the model are considered as sectionally linear continuous functions that determined by their values for integral values of π‘. are 3. Evaluation of the Turnovsky model’s parameters and a retrospective forecasting As a part of the solution to the problem of evaluation of the model’ input parameters (parametrical identification) we obtained the values of the following input functions and parameters π(π‘), π(π‘), π(π‘), γ(π‘), π΄(π‘), α(π‘), λ(π‘), π(π‘), π1 (π‘), π2 (π‘), π3 (π‘), π4 (π‘), π’(π‘) where π‘ = 0, 1, … , 9, and π, π0 , π0 , π§0 , π0 applying the searching method in sense of the criterion minimum (the sum of the squares of the residuals of the output variables) based on statistical data of the Republic of Kazakhstan economy evolution for 2000 – 2009. The values of the input functions and parameters were sought in the small intervals centered at the observed values of the corresponding functions and parameters (in case of their presence). The criterion of the parametrical identification has the following type (10). πΎπΌ = ∑ν 1 π π=1 ∑π‘=0 πππ‘ π₯π (π‘)−π₯π∗ (π‘) ∑νπ=1 ∑ππ‘=0 πππ‘ ( π₯π∗ (π‘) 2 ) → min. (10) Here ν = 5 – the number of output variables, used in the evaluation of the parameters, π – number of the variable; π + 1 – number of observations, π‘ = 0 corresponds to the beginning of the year of 2000; π₯π (π‘) – calculated values of output variables (π¦(π‘), π(π‘), π§(π‘), π(π‘), π(π‘)) at corresponding time values. The sign “*” corresponds to the observed values of the corresponding variables. πππ‘ – positive weight coefficients, whose values were chosen on the basis of the significance of the values of related output variables in solving the problem of parametrical identification of the model. Table 1 presents weights of the criterion πΎπΌ ; πππ‘ value is at the intersection of π row and π‘ column. The Runge-Kutta and the Nelder-Mead algorithms [7] were applied while solving the parameter evaluation problem (π = 7). The stated problem of parametrical identification was solved using the statistical data for the period of 2000 – 2007. As the result of the solution to the stated problem, the relative value of the weight average quadratic deviation of the calculated values of the model’s output variables from the corresponding observed values (100√πΎπΌ ) did not exceed 1.2 %. As part of the model verification the following problem of retroforecasting was solved. Get an estimate of relative errors of calculated values of the model’s output variables relative to the corresponding observed values on the interval from 2008 to 2009, applying the obtained values of input functions, parameters, and initial Table 1 πππ‘ weigh of πΎπΌ criterion Year 2000, π‘=0 Variable 2001, π‘=1 2002, π‘=2 2003, π‘=3 2004, π‘=4 2005, π‘=5 2006, π‘=6 2007, π‘=7 π¦(π‘), π = 1 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 0.01 1 1 1 π(π‘), π = 2 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 π§(π‘), π = 3 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 0.01 1 1 1 π(π‘), π = 4 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.1 π(π‘), π = 5 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.1 values of output variables for the period 2000 – 2007 (also applying extrapolation of values of input functions for the period of 2008 – 2009). Results of the solution to this problem are presented in the following table (Table 2). Here sign “*” corresponds to the observed values; the sign “Δ” corresponds to the deviations (in percentage) of calculated values from the corresponding observed values. For the period of retroforecasting the average error of the variables, shown in the table, is 3.7825%, indicating acceptable accuracy in describing the evolution of Kazakhstan's economy with the help of the model. Table 2 Observed, calculated values of output variables of the model and corresponding deviations (in percentage) Year 2008 2009 ∗ 336140 334680 π¦ 333843 333015 βπ¦ π¦ 0.68322 0.49744 ∗ 1117488 1305937 π§ 1228469 1483599 βπ§ π§ 9.93126 13.60410 ∗ 747806 771832 π 675539 762518 βπ 9.66383 1.20669 ∗ 0.11828 0.07525 π 0.11881 0.07639 βπ 0.45321 1.51652 ∗ 136501 151534 π 136424 151855 βπ 0.05666 0.21187 π π π 4. Investigation of the structural stability of the Turnovsky monetary model This study was conducted based on the following Robinson [6] theorem (Theorem A) about sufficient conditions for weak structural stability. Suppose π′ – is some manifold, N – is a compact subset in π′ such that the closure of π interior is π. Let some vector field be defined in a neighborhood of the set π in π′, this field defines πΆ 1 -flow π in this neighborhood. Let π (π, π) be chain-recurrent set of flow π on π. Let π (π, π) be contained inside of π. Let it have hyperbolic structure, additionally flow π on π (π, π) also satisfies the transversality conditions of stable and unstable manifolds. Then flow π on π is weakly structurally stable. In particular, if π (π, π) is the empty set, then the π flow is weakly structurally stable on π. The analogous result is true for a discrete dynamic system (a cascade), defined by the homeomorphism (with image) π: π′ → π. Below, based on the algorithm for constructing the symbolic image [9] we propose the algorithm for the localization of the chain-recurrent set for a compact subset of phase space of a dynamical system described by a system of ordinary differential and algebraic equations. For computer simulation of the chain-recurrent set we used an oriented graph (a symbolic image), which is a discretization of the mapping shift along the trajectories determined by this dynamic system. For a specific mathematical model of economic system we can take as a compact π, for example, a parallelepiped from its phase space, which includes all the possible trajectories of economic system evolution for the examined period of time. Description of the algorithm for localization of a chain-recurrent set consists of the following. 1. The mapping π is set, defined in π and by a shift along the trajectories of a dynamical system for a fixed period of time. 2. πΆ partition of the compact π into ππ cells is constructed. The oriented graph πΊ is specified whose nodes correspond to cells, and edges connecting ππ cells with ππ correspond to the conditions of intersection of the image of one cell π(ππ ) with another cell ππ . 3. The graph πΊ contains all returning nodes (nodes belonging to cycles). If the set of such nodes is empty, then π (π, π) is empty and the process of its localization is complited. The conclusion about a weak structural stability of a dynamical systems is made. 4. Cells related to returning nodes of the graph πΊ are divided into smaller cells, and the oriented graph πΊ is constructed according to them (See step 2 of the algorithm). 5. Transition to the step 3. Steps 3, 4, 5 are repeated until the diameters of the cells of the partition will not be less than some preassigned number ε. The last set of cells is evaluation of the chainrecurrent set π (π, π). The research of structural stability of the model (1) – (9) was conducted based on: the theorem about sufficient conditions of weak structural stability, by localization of the chain-recurrent set π (π, π) based on the algorithm and under the additional assumption of constancy of all input functions of the model. In this case the equations (1) – (9) determine the flow π in the four-dimensional phase space of the model’s output variables (π, π, π§, π). In the presented algorithm π mapping was determined as a shift along the trajectories of the dynamic system (1) – (9) that corresponds to the change of time π‘ by 1 (year). Input functions of the model were defined as constant (their values for 2007 were taken). During the application of the given above algorithm we used the parallelepiped {0 ≤ π ≤ 0.2, 0 ≤ π ≤ 8000, 0 ≤ π§ ≤ 50000, 0 ≤ π ≤ 830000} in the phase space of the model (1) – (9) as the initial compact π. Partition of the initial parallelepiped (and of the other cells, obtained as a result of the algorithm application) into 16 parts was done by dividing of its all edges into two equal parts. As a result of the calculation of the developed programme after 4 iterations that were run in accordance with the given above algorithm, we obtained the graph πΊ with empty sets of nodes. This means that the investigated Turnovsky monetary model with considered values of input parameters is assessed as weakly structurally stable in the specified compact π. 5. Evaluation of the Turnovsky model’s parametrical sensitivity coefficients of the stated output values of the model relative to its input values, calculated using the formula: πΉππ (π‘) = 100 π₯π (π‘) . (11) Here π – variable input parameter or the value of input function; π₯π (π‘) – value of π-th output variable for π‘ time obtained when running the model with values of input parameters and functions, obtained as a result of the parameter evaluation or taken from statistical sources (the basic calculation); π₯ππ (π‘) – value of the corresponding output variable, obtained when increasing the value of the input variable parameter π by 1%, while the remaining values of input parameters and functions remain unchanged compared to the basic calculation. The results of solving the problem by constructing a matrix of parametrical sensitivity are partially shown in Table 3. For example, when the value of the parameter π(9) increases by 1% and when the value of π(8) remains unchanged, the linear function π(π‘) correspondingly increases in the interval [8], [9], this in its turn involves the change in values of output variables (and coefficients πΉππ (π‘)) when π‘ = 9. The analysis of Table 3 indicates, that within the given input parameters for the year of 2009, the output variables π¦(9), π(9), π§(9), π(9), π(9) are mostly affected by the change in the coefficient of the production function α(9), and the output variable π(9) can only be affected by the change of price index π(9). 6. Finding optimal values of regulated parameters based on the Turnovsky model We now consider the possibility of implementing an effective government policy based on the model (1) – (9) through the synthesis of optimal values of economic parameters: per capita government spending π(π‘) and the income tax rate π’(π‘) for the period 2010 – 2015. The synthesis problem of an optimal law of parametrical regulation on the level of mentioned parameters π(π‘) and π’(π‘) can be formulated in the following way. Based on the mathematical model (1) – (9) find such values of π(π‘), π’(π‘), π‘ = 10, … ,15, that would provide the maximum of the criterion (average of real per capita output for the period 2010 – 2015) 1 As part of the solution to the problem of assessing the impact of the values of input parameters and functions of the model on the values of its output variables we constructed a matrix whose rows are indexed by all the input parameters and functions, and columns – by the values of the six output variables for π‘ = 9, which corresponds to 2009. This matrix contains the sensitivity π₯ππ(π‘)−π₯π (π‘) πΎ = ∑15 π‘=10 π¦(π‘) 6 (12) under the following constrains imposed on the model’s output variables and regulated parameters (here π‘ ∈ [10, 15]). Table 3 Some elements of the parametrical sensitivity of the model for π‘ = 9 Output variable π§(9) π(9) π(9) -0.01637 π¦(9) 0 -0.0123 0.00309 -0.0165 1.693064 π(9) 0.280699 0 0.26993 0.33196 0.28325 0.881013 π(9) -0.01726 0 -0.0206 -0.0293 -0.0174 0.048407 π(9) -0.00993 0.5161 -0.052 -0.0136 -0.01 -0.3979 λ(9) -0.03802 0 0.0294 -0.0888 -0.0384 -2.59267 γ(9) 0.136572 0 -0.002 -0.2708 0.13781 -0.45509 π΄(9) 0.790219 0 -0.0334 -0.2985 -0.2096 -3.41885 α(9) 11.38849 0 -0.3144 -2.2215 -2.6097 -53.2406 Input Parameter π(9) π(9) π(9) π1 (9) -0.16371 0 0.0578 -0.2697 -0.1652 -4.8311 π2 (9) 0.009145 0 0.01151 -0.0083 0.00923 -1.51853 π3 (9) -0.04331 0 -0.0052 -0.0387 -0.0437 0.849691 π4 (9) -0.14034 0 0.0436 -0.2246 -0.1416 -3.58984 π(π‘) > 0, π(π‘) > 0, π§(π‘) > 0, π(π‘) > 0, π ∗ (π‘) > 0, π(π‘) > 0, π(π‘) > 0, 0 < π’(π‘) < 1. (13) (14) Note that for the basic calculation of the model for the period till 2015, that was obtained at determined values of the model’s input parameters and with the help of extrapolation of the model’s input functions by linear trend, the value of the criterion turned out to be πΎ = 437368 tenge (in prices of the year 2000). As the result of the numerical solution to the stated problem of finding optimal values of π(π‘), π’(π‘) parameters of economic system applying the NelderMead algorithm [7] we obtained the optimal result πΎ = 511552. Compared to the basic variant, if to apply the considered above parametrical regulation, the increase in the value of πΎ criterion was 16.96%. Graphs of calculated values of the model’s output variable – real per capita output (π¦(π‘)) without parametrical regulation, and applying the found optimal law of parametrical regulation, are presented below in Figure 1. Figure 1. Real per capita output 7. Investigation of the dependence of the optimal values of the parametrical regulation criterion on the values of unregulated parameters based on the Turnovsky model The considered above optimization problem was solved at fixed values of input parameters that are not involved in the regulation. In addition, during the research we found the dependence of optimal values of the criterion πΎ on the values of unregulated parameters of the model by the example of two-dimensional parameter π = (π(9), λ(9)) consisting of a share of real consumption out of real disposable income and the investment coefficient for 2009. The range of variation of these parameters was determined based on the estimated values of π(9) and λ(9) in the form of the rectangle π΄ = [0.0820; 0.1090] × [0.708; 0.719]. Figure 2 shows some results of studies: graphs of the dependence of πΎ criterion on π parameter (where π ∈ π΄) for the considered above problem of parametrical regulation. Graphs in Figure 2 describe the basic and optimal (for the problem of finding per capita government spending and income tax rates) values of the criterion πΎ. Figure 2. – basic variant, – regulation of per capita government spending and income tax rates 8. Conclusion 1. The results of solving the problem of parametrical identification of the considered model are presented. 2. The estimate of the weak structural stability of the Turnovsky model in a compact domain of the phase space was obtained. 3. The optimal (in the sense of characterizing economic growth) the values of regulated parameters of the model were found. 4. The dependence of the optimal values of the criterion that characterizes an economic growth on the two uncontrolled parameters was found. The obtained results can be used in the development and implementation of an effective state policy. References [1] S. Turnovsky. Macroeconomic Dynamics and Growth in a Monetary Economy: a Synthesis, Journal of money, Credit and Banking, 10(Issue 1), 1978, 1-26. [2] A.A. Ashimov, B.T. Sultanov, Zh.M. Adilov, Yu.V. Borovskiy, D.A. Novikov, R.M. Nizhegorodcev, & As.A. Ashimov, Macroeconomic analysis and economic policy based on parametrical regulation (Moscow: Physmatlit, 2010, in Russian). [3] Π.Π. Ashimov, N.A. Iskakov, Yu.V. Borovskiy, B.T. Sultanov, & As.Π. Ashimov, Parametrical regulation of economic growth on the basis of one-class mathematical models, Systems Science, 35(1), 2009, 57-63. [4] A.A. Ashimov, K.A. Sagadiyev, Yu.V. Borovskiy, N.A. Iskakov, & Πs.A. Ashimov, Elements of the market economy development parametrical regulation theory, Proc. 9th IASTED International Conf. on Control and Application, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2007, 296-301. [5] A.A. Ashimov, K.A. Sagadiyev, Yu.V. Borovskiy, N.A. Iskakov, As.A. Ashimov, On the market economy development parametrical regulation theory, Kybernetes, The international journal of cybernetics, systems and management sciences, 37(5), 2008, 623-636. [6] C. Robinson, Structural Stability on Manifolds with Boundary, Journal of differential equations, (37), 1980, 111. [7] J.A Nelder & R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, The Computer Journal, (7), 1965, 308-313. [8] V.I. Arnold, Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1997). [9] E.I. Petrenko, Development and Implementation of Algorithms for Construction of the Symbolic Image, Electronic journal “Differential equations and control processes”, (3), 2006, 55-96. [10] V.L Makarov, A.R Bahtizin, & S.S. Sulakshin, Application of computable models in state administration. (Moscow: Scientific expert, 2007, in Russian). [11] S.J. Turnovsky, Methods of Macroeconomic Dynamics, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000).