English, loanword champion of the world!
It’s the number-one lender of words to other languages--but not everyone wants to borrow them
By Britt Peterson The Boston Globe
JUNE 29, 2014
PART I
(I) THERE’S NOTHING LIKE visiting Finland to make an English-speaker appreciate the
value of words borrowed from other languages. Finnish, as I learned during a trip earlier
this month, is an agglutinative language, in which parts of words stay distinct instead of
fusing together.
(II) This makes for very long words, like “kahdenneksikymmenenneksiyhdeksänneksi”
(one way to say “29,” according to my guidebook), and considerable bewilderment for a
visitor. Every now and then, though, a light would shine through the darkness: I’d catch
something like “hot jooga” or “muffensi” or “grill maisteri,” and sigh with relief.
(III) It’s a common experience for English speakers abroad: suddenly recognizing a
familiar word in a newspaper, or on a billboard, or in a fragment of conversation. Since
World War II, English has become by far the leading exporter of “loanwords,” as they’re
known, including nearly universal terms like “OK,” “Internet,” and “hamburger.” The
extent to which a language loans words is a measure of its prestige, said Martin
Haspelmath, a linguist at the Max Planck Institute. English, clearly, is now on top.
(IV) But that imbalance can build resentment. In France, the secretary of the Academie
Française called last December for a “reconquest of the French language” from loanwords;
in China, government-friendly papers printed screeds this spring against “Wi-Fi,” “VIP,”
and “e-mail.” Even as many governments work to protect languages from the spread of
English, however, speakers in those countries go happily off to “hot jooga,” meaning that
official policy and the daily reality of English may be very different things.
(V) Loanwords are fun to track, from the perspective of the loaner. But if you’re the
borrower, there can be a feeling of defeat, that you’ve relinquished your own way of saying
things. This has fed linguistic purism: attempts to cleanse languages of foreign influences,
or resist them in the first place.
Reading comprehension:
TRUE OR FALSE:
1.
2.
3.
4.
A light in the darkness: a sudden recognition of something familiar.
A non-prestigious language will tend to lend many words.
There is a big gap between government language policy and language use.
According to the article, languages that borrow from other languages are
simultaneously giving up their capacity of expressing themselves with their own
original words.
PART II
Sometimes purism peaks after a war or in a post-colonial situation. South Korea tried to
de-Japanify its language after World War II; the Indian and Pakistani governments tried to
separate Hindi and Urdu after their partition. A purist approach can also be a smaller
language’s way of resisting outside influence. In Iceland, the Icelandic Language Institute
preserves the country’s Viking-era language by cobbling together new terms from
indigenous roots. Some Native American groups do the same to resist English.
Chinese is an imperial language that has always loaned more than it borrowed. In the Max
Planck Institute’s World Loanword Database, Mandarin Chinese has the lowest percentage
of borrowings of all 41 languages studied, only 2 percent. (English, with one of the highest,
has 42 percent). Despite (or because of) the vast appetite among the Chinese for learning
English as a foreign language, Chinese ministers have recently cracked down on
loanwords. And yet Chinese people still say “baibai” and “sorry”; “e-mail” is just a lot easier
than “dianzi youjian,” the official substitute.
When languages are full of borrowed words, it’s often not by choice. Romany has many
loans because of a history of extreme marginalization. Japan has a long tradition of
cultural borrowing; it was also occupied for years after World War II. Vietnam, following
centuries of successive occupations, has a high rate of Chinese and French loans presaging
more recent English ones like “canguru,” according to the Max Planck research. Other
languages are more deliberately open: according to a research, the Danes are the most
welcoming Scandinavian country to loans.
Most languages fall somewhere in between the extremes. Many European countries went
through a period of linguistic nationalism in the 19th century and continue to regulate
loans today. The Language Council of Norway, for example, has created official
“Norwegian” spellings for English loanwords since 1996—although some, like “pøbb”
(pub), were apparently rejected by the Norwegian people. Finland, fairly open to loans, has
the Kielitoimisto, the Finnish Language Office, which helps create neologisms like
“pehmelö” (“smoothie”) and advises on how to adapt foreign words into Finnish.
It’s not hard to see why governments would seek to defend their languages. But some
linguists think a staunch anti-English stance may be counterproductive. Truly endangered
languages tend to be encroached on mostly by their dominant geographic neighbors, says
Selma Sonntag, a political scientist at Humboldt State University who studies language
purist movements: “The threat isn’t from English, it’s from whatever the official language
is within their area.” Linguist David Crystal, author of “English as a Global Language,” has
written about how Welsh-language purism may be furthering an elitism that prevents
younger speakers from adopting the tongue. And it’s worth noting that English owes much
of its vitality to its long history of borrowing from French, Latin, Arabic, and pretty much
any other language it met. “Loanwords...do alter [a language’s] character—but is this a bad
thing?” Crystal told me. “Imagine English without French or Latin loanwords. No
Shakespeare, for a start.”
When England became an empire, English began borrowing less and became the prolific
word lender it is today, Haspelmath told me. If we start borrowing again—the way Arabic
stopped exporting words to the rest of the world once its empire crumbled and started
borrowing more from French and English—we’ll know we’ve seen the apex of our cultural
influence. Until then, at least we’ll be able to find a hot yoga class just about anywhere in
the world.
1. Give examples of how countries have defended and are defending their languages.
2. What are the reasons for the existence of so many languages full of borrowed
words?
3. Why does the author think it is counterproductive to accuse English of language
imperialism?