ERT 445/2 FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1
BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING PROGRAMME
UNIVERSITI MALAYSIA PERLIS
SCHOOL OF BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING
WRITTEN PROPOSAL RUBRIC
(
Name of Student :
Project’ Title:
Name of Supervisor:
Matric No:
NO CRITERIA
1
Organization & Style
EXEMPLARY (4)
 Excellent flow of
information according
to the UniMAP standard
format and guidelines.
PROFICIENT (3)
 Good flow of information
according to the UniMAP
standard format and
guidelines.
2
Content & Knowledge
 Fully meet the level of
knowledge required by
the course.
 Sufficiently fulfil the level
of knowledge required by
the course.

3
Executive Summary
 The executive summary
is professional and
creates a curiosity in the
reader to go further in
the report.
 The executive summary is
just a correct
compounding of the
report content.

4
Findings /Result
[Expected finding]
 Thorough comparison
and contrast of findings
are provided and relate
to the main discussion
points in the order of
their appearance in the
 Comparison and contrast
of findings are sufficiently
provided thoroughness.
 Discussion of findings
sufficiently relates to the
main discussion points in



ACCEPTABLE (2)
Moderate flow of
information
according to the
UniMAP standard
format and
guidelines.
Partially meet the
level of knowledge
required by the
course.
One of the important
information about
the project is missing
(e.g. problem
statement, solution
procedure,
deliverables)
Comparison and
contrast of findings
are provided but lack
thoroughness.
Discussion of
findings could relate
UNACCEPTABLE (1)
 Poor flow of
information
according to the
UniMAP standard
format and
guidelines.
 Insufficient level of
knowledge
required by the
course.
 The executive
summary lacks a lot
of relevant
information about
the project.
 Comparison and
contrast of findings
are lacking.
 Discussion of
findings does not
relate well to main
SCORE
ERT 445/2 FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1
BIOPROCESS ENGINEERING PROGRAMME
5
Spelling & Grammar
6
References
purpose statement.
 Focus is on research
findings rather than
research methods.
 Rare errors in spelling
and grammar are
observed in the report.
 Optimum number
current references
citation.
 APA format is used
accurately and
consistently in the
paper and on the
“References” page.
the purpose statement.
 Seldom errors in spelling
and grammar are
observed in the report.
 Sufficient number current
references citation
 APA format is used with
minor errors.
better to the main
discussion points in
the purpose
statement.
 Frequent errors in
spelling and
grammar are
observed in the
report.
 Partially sufficient
number current
references citation
 There are frequent
errors in APA format.
discussion points in
the purpose
statement.
 Abundance of
errors in spelling,
and grammar are
observed in the
report.
 Inadequate
number current
references citation
 Format of the
document is not
recognizable as
APA.
TOTAL SCORE
*Notes: Zero marks will be given if the proposal does not meet the minimum requirement as stated in the above rubric.
....................................
Supervisor’s Signature
Name
:
Date
:
Official Stamp :
/24