MBA 8415 Derivations for Levered and Unlevered Equity Betas (β) Dr. D.A. Stangeland Converting between unlevered and levered equity betas is a straightforward process, but attention must be paid to assumptions regarding taxes paid by the firm and its investors. Three cases are presented below. Definitions: Let VU = the total value of an unlevered firm (no debt in the capital structure) VL = the total value of an levered firm Define VL = D + E (Equation 1) Where D = Debt value E = Levered equity value Note: VU = Unlevered equity value Also, define the risk of the equity as follows: βU = βUnlevered equity βL = βLevered equity Case 1: No Tax Case From M&M we know that VL = VU which results because the total cash flows to debt and equity for the levered firm are the same as the total cashflows to equity in the unlevered firm. This also implies that the overall risk of the levered firm must equal the overall risk of the unlevered firm. Therefore, βU, the risk of unlevered firm, must equal the risk of the levered firm. The risk of the levered firm is the weighted average of the risk of the debt and the levered equity. D E D L Thus, βU must equal VL VL Rearranging terms we get L V D VL D u D L u D E E E VL Substitute in Equation 1 for VL and we get L DE D u D E E D D D Rearranging terms we get L 1 u D u u D E E E D u D E No tax case L u Copyright © 2002 David A. Stangeland MBA 8415 Notes and Derivations for Determining Levered Equity Betas (β) Dr. D.A. Stangeland Page 2 of 4 Case 2: Corporate Taxes From M&M with corporate tax we have VL = VU + TC ∙ D. (Equation 2) Since VL = D + E is also true, the following equality holds: D + E = VU + TC ∙ D (Equation 3) The weighted average risks of the components on both sides of Equation 3 must be equal and these represent the overall risk of the levered firm. Thus we get D E V T D D L u u c D VL VL VL VL Multiplying both sides by VL, we get D D E L Vu u Tc D D Rearranging terms we get L 1 Vu u Tc D D D D E Rearrange Equation 2 and substitute in VL Tc D for Vu and we get L 1 VL U Tc D U Tc D D D D E Now multiply through by L 1 and substitute in Equation 1 to get E D DE D D D u TC u D Tc D u 1 Tc u D E E E E E L u D 1 Tc u D E Corporate Tax Case Copyright © 2002 David A. Stangeland MBA 8415 Notes and Derivations for Determining Levered Equity Betas (β) Dr. D.A. Stangeland Page 3 of 4 Case 3: Corporate and Personal Taxes From Miller’s Debt and Taxes article we know that 1 Tc 1 TPE VL Vu D 1 1 TPD (Equation 4) Where TPE is the personal tax rate on equity income for the marginal investor and TPD is the personal tax rate on debt income for the marginal investor. Substitute in Equation 1 for VL and we get D E Vu D (Equation 5) 1 Tc 1 TPE Note: to shorten the text of the derivation, let 1 1 TPD (Equation 6) The weighted average risks of the components on both sides of Equation 5 must be equal and these represent the overall risk of the levered firm. Thus we get D E V D D L u u D VL VL VL VL Multiplying both sides by VL, we get D D E L Vu u D D Rearranging terms we get L 1 Vu u D D D D E Rearrange Equation 4 and substitute in VL D for VU and we get 1 VLu D u D D D D and now multiply through by 1 and substitute in E E D DE D D D u u D D u 1 u D Equation 1 to get L E E E E E L Finally, insert Equation 6 to get L u L u D 1 Tc 1 TPE 1 1 1 TPD u D E D 1 Tc 1 TPE u D E 1 TPD Corporate and Personal Tax Case Copyright © 2002 David A. Stangeland MBA 8415 Notes and Derivations for Determining Levered Equity Betas (β) Dr. D.A. Stangeland Page 4 of 4 Summary To lever or unlever equity betas, use the appropriate formulas below depending upon the assumptions regarding taxes. L u D u D E No Tax Case L u D 1 Tc u D E Corporate Tax Case L u D 1 Tc 1 TPE u D E 1 TPD Corporate and Personal Tax Case Copyright © 2002 David A. Stangeland