Concrete Technology

advertisement

CMIC 2012

Increased Limestone Mineral in Cement the Effect on Chloride Ion Ingress of

Concrete – A Literature Review

B T (Tom) Benn – Adelaide Brighton Cement Ltd

Ass Prof Daksh Baweja – University of Technology Sydney

Prof Julie E Mills – University of South Australia

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Introduction

• Background to mineral additions

• Cements

• Limestone

• Cement kiln dust

• Supplementary cementitious materials

• General properties of concrete

• Durability

• Chloride ingress

• Transport mechanisms

• Conclusions & Research proposal

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Introduction

• Limestone addition first used 1965

• Heidelberg cement at 20%

• 5% mineral addition

• Europe in general early 1980’s

• South Africa 1982

• Canada 1983

• Australia 1991

• USA 2005

• Limestone cements (>5%) 1992 in ENV 197-1

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Comparison of cement properties

Property

Standard

Initial set

Units Type GP CEM I

– 32.5

CEM I

– 42.5

Minutes

AS 3972

≥ 45

EN 197-1

≥ 75

EN 197-1

≥ 75

Type I

ASTM C150

≥ 45

Final set

MgO

Chloride ion

SO

3

Loss on ignition

Strength 2-day

Strength 3-day

Strength 7-day

Strength 28-day

Hours

%

%

%

%

MPa

MPa

MPa

MPa

< 6

< 4.5

(clinker)

≤ 0.10

≤3.5

--

--

--

≥ 35

≥ 45

--

≤ 5.0

≤ 0.10

≤ 3.5

≤ 5.0

--

--

≥ 16.0

≥ 32.5 ≤ 52.5

--

≤ 5.0

≤ 0.10

≤ 3.5

≤ 5.0

≥ 10.0

--

--

≥ 42.5 ≤ 62.5

≤ 6.25

≤ 6.0

--

≤ 3.0 (C

3

A < 8%)

≤ 3.5 (C

3

A > 8%)

≤ 3.0

--

12.0 (cubes)

19.0

28.0

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Limestone

Australia & Europe

Natural inorganic mineral material

CaO

3 not less than 75% by mass

If CaO

3 between 75% & 80% must be tested:

Clay content must be less than 1.20% (methylene blue test)

Total organic test not greater 0.50% by mass

• CaO

3 content 80 % or greater no additional testing

Canada

CaO

3 content at least 70% by mass

USA

CaO

3 content at least 75% by mass

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Cement Kiln Dust

Dust created and extracted from kiln

Also known as by-pass dust

Typically between 7% – 15% of clinker

Why removed

Causes build up and rings in kiln and preheater

Causes abnormal setting and strength characteristics in cement

If high in chlorides contributes to reinforcement corrosion

If high in alkalis contributes to ASR reaction

Chemistry

Similar to raw materials for cement and clinker

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Cement kiln dust chemistry

Constituent

Silicon dioxide

Aluminium oxide

Iron oxide

Calcium oxide

Magnesium oxide

Sulphur trioxide

Chlorine

Potassium oxide

Sodium oxide

Long dry kilns

(U.S. EPA (1993)

ABC data

(07

– 10)

4.3 – 10.1

9.5 – 20.6

1.0 – 3.3

0.7 – 2.3

2.8 – 4.5

1.8 – 3.1

11.0 – 45.0

0.4 – 2.0

0.1 – 7.7

0.08 – 2.7

0.2

– 9.7

0.07 – 1.12

41.5

0.8

0.5

– 62.9

– 1.6

– 4.7

0.6 – 7.5

1.8

– 15.5

0.2 – 1.1

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Supplementary Cementitious Materials

Fly ash, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, silica fume

Advantages of using

Improved workability

Better cohesiveness and pumpability

Improved post 28-day strengths

Reduction in ASR with reactive aggregates

Reduced shrinkage (fly ash)

Reduced heat of hydration

Lower permeability (important for resistance to chloride ingress)

Improved resistance to chemical (sulphate) attack

Protection of steel in marine environments (GGBS)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Strength of concrete Made with Portland Cement & Portland limestone cement

(from Hooton & Thomas 2010)

Limestone, %

Blaine, m

2

/kg

No Water Reducing Admixture With Water Reducing Admixture

PC-1 PLC-2 PC-2 PLC-4 PC-1 PLC-1 PLC-2 PLC-3 PC-2 PLC-4

4.8

380

12

500

4.8

380

12

500

4.8

380

12

450

12

500

12

580

4.8

380

12

500 w/c ratio 0.505 0.512 0.505 0.518 0.491 0.498 0.498 0.508 0.495 0.502

Slump, mm 115 110 115 110 110 110 110 80 105 105

1-day

7-day

19.2

33.5

21.4

32.7

18.5

32.3

18.9

31.6

21.8

35.3

21.9

34.4

23.6

35.2

24.6

36.7

21.0

35.6

22.0

35.0

28-day

56-day

41.1

43.8

39.8

43.3

39.3

44.0

39.9

43.0

42.2

45.2

40.3

43.6

41.9

44.7

42.5

46.6

42.3

45.2

41.5

45.8

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Compressive strengths of various grades of lab concrete

(Benn & Thomas 2012)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Set times of various grades of lab concrete

(Benn & Thomas 2012)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Drying shrinkage of various grades of lab concrete

(Benn & Thomas 2012)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Findings on properties in the literature

Voglis et al. (2 005) - for similar compressive strength in concrete limestone cement required a wider particle size distribution

Tsivilis et al. (1999a) – increasing tricalcium aluminate (C

3

A) and reducing the tricalcium silicate (C

3

S) increases compressive strength at all ages irrespective of the limestone between 10% and 35%.

Bonavetti et al. (2003) - the increased early hydration and strength due to formation of nucleation sites

Vogilis et al. (2005) - increased early hydration and strength dueto the early formation of calcium carboaluminates.

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Findings on properties in the literature

Matthews (1994) - for the same slump

(w/c) ratio needs to increase by 0.01 for limestone up to 5% a further 0.01 when increased from 5% to 25%.

Schmidt (1993) - using cement from a different source, reported water demand for concrete could be reduced

• Hooton, Nokken & Thomas (2007) supported the statement by Tsivilis et al. (1999a) ‘… that the appropriate choice of clinker quality, limestone quality, percentage limestone content and cement fineness can lead to the production of

a limestone cement with the desired properties’.

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Durability

Durability can be different things to different people such as:

• Not having to repair a structure for 20 years or more,

• Able to cope with changes in use,

Able to cope with changes in loading,

Able to resist chemical attack e.g. acids, alkali-silica reaction,

Able to prevent chloride ingress to prevent corrosion of reinforcement,

Having a classical façade that does not seem to age with changes in architectural fashions.

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Description of ingress mechanisms

Diffusion – transfer free ions in the pore solution from high concentration to low concentration regions.

Capillary absorption – when moisture encounters the dry surface of the concrete, it will be drawn into the pores by capillary suction, this often happens with wetting and drying cycles.

Evaporative transport (also called wicking) – similar to absorption but where moisture, containing ions, is drawn from the wet surface through the matrix to the dry surface.

Hydrostatic pressure or permeation – where the hydraulic pressure on one side of the concrete forces the liquid, containing ions, into the concrete matrix.

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Exposure

Submerged

Tidal

Splash and spray

Coastal

Type of structure

Substructure below low tide

Primary chloride transport mode

Diffusion

Basement exterior walls or transport tunnel liners below low tide. Liquid containing structures

Permeation, diffusion and possibility wick action

Substructures and superstructures in tidal one.

Capillary absorption and diffusion

Superstructures about high tide in the open sea.

Capillary absorption and diffusion

(also carbonation)

Land based structures in coastal area or superstructures above high tide in river estuary or body of water in coastal area.

Capillary absorption (also carbonation)

Mechanism of chloride transport

(CCAA 2009)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Findings reported in international literature

Property

Fineness (m

2

/kg)

Mortar: 28 day strength (MPa)

Concrete w/c

Concrete: 28 day strength (MPa)

Concrete: RCPT (Coulombs)

Percentage limestone

0

260

51.1

10

340

47.9

15

366

48.5

0.70

31.9

6100

27.4

5800

27.3

6000

20

470

48.1

28.0

6400

35

530

32.9

0.62

26.6

6600

Effect of limestone additions on the “chloride permeability’ of concrete

(Tsivilis et al. 2000)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Findings reported in international literature

Effect of Limestone Additions on Chloride Penetration of Concrete –

Oxygen Permeability

(Matthews, 1994 )

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Findings reported in international literature

Effect of Limestone Addition on the Chloride Diffusion

Coefficient of Concrete by Initial Surface Absorption

(Dhir et al. 2007)

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Findings reported in international literature

Diffusion coefficients (x 10-12 m2/s) for concrete after 35 days immersion in 3% NaCl solution (Hooton, Ramezanianpour & Schutz, 2010)

GU

100%

PLC10

100%

PLC15

100%

GU 70%

GGBS 30%

PLC10 70%

GGBS 30%

PLC15 70%

GGBS 30%

C s

(% mass)

D a

(m

2

/s*10

-

0.73

15.9

0.84

15.6

0.8

22.5

1.1

8.07

1.07

6.11

(i) GU is general use Portland cement.

(ii) PLC is Portland limestone cement with either 10% or 15 % limestone.

(iii) The 70% implies 70 % cement and 30 % slag.

0.98

8.25

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Conclusions

Some indication that without the inclusion of SCM the durability may be at risk (Irassar et al. 2001).

Literature supports the hypothesis that that the use of SCM will improve the durability even with high mineral additions(Thomas & Hooton 2010)

Previous research indicates that CKD can be added to cement

(Daugherty and Funnell 1983).

Gap in the data as no reference has been found relating to chloride ingress where CKD is added during the milling of the clinker and in particular where the CKD contains chlorides.

Gap in the knowledge on the effect of the inclusion of both higher limestone additions and CKD in cement on the chloride ingress into concrete, made with and without fly ash or slag.

CMIC 2012

Mineral Additions & Chloride Ingress

Proposed research

Mortar with w/c ratio ≈ 0.45 with following cementitious contents:

• Control - cement only mix, limestone additions = 5%, no CKD

• Experimental cement mixes, limestone additions = 10% & 15% + CKD.

• Cement/fly ash mixes, fly ash replacement = 20% & 30%.

Cement/slag mixes, slag replacement = 30% and 50%.

Measure compressive strengths development for up to three years.

Measure chloride diffusion for up to three years (Nord Test NT 443 ?)

• Measure rapid chloride permeability (RCPT ASTM C 1202 ?)

Concrete with f’

C of 40 MPa to confirm mortar findings

Research will support sustainability as suggested by the Kevin Gluskie

Download