ALK and Other Evolving Targets in Advanced NSCLC Mark A. Socinski, MD Professor of Medicine and Thoracic Surgery Director, Lung Cancer Section, Division of Hematology/Oncology Clinical Associate Director, Lung SPORE Co-Director, UPMC Lung Cancer Center of Excellence and Lung and Thoracic Malignancies Program University of Pittsburgh The Targets • • • • • • ALK ROS1 BRAF C-Met RET PI3KCA ALK ALK Rearrangement in Cancer ALK-POSITIVE CANCERS: Inversion Or Translocation • NSCLC – EML4-ALK, KIF5B- ALK, TFG-ALK (3-5%) • Anaplastic large cell lymphoma – NPM-ALK • Inflammatory myo-fibroblastic tumor – TPM3-ALK, TPM4-ALK • Other solid tumors Demographics of ALK Population Shaw et al.1 (n=19) Rodig et al. 2 (n=20) Yoshida et al. 3 (n=10) Inamura et al. 4 (n=11) Zhang et al. 5 (n=12) Wong et al. 6 (n=13) Kwak et al. 7 (n=82) Age (Median) 52 yrs 51 yrs 58 yrs 56 yrs <61 yrs* 59 yrs 51 yrs Gender (% Male) 58 55 50 45 58 38.5 52 Never smoker (%) 74 70 50 55 83 92.3 76 Histology ( % adeno) 84 Only Only adeno adeno studied studied Only adeno studied 83 84.6 96 56% show signet ring cells 55% acinar histology Histology (other features) 1.Shaw AT et al, J Clin Oncol :27:4247-53, 2009 2.Rodig SJ et al, Clin Cancer Res;15:5216-23, 2009 3.Yoshida A et al, Lung Cancer:72:309-15, 2011 4.Inamura K et al, Mod Pathol:22:508-15, 2009 5.Zhang X et al, Mol Cancer:9:188, 2010 6. Wong DW et al, Cancer:115:1723-33, 2009 7. Kwak EL et al, N Engl J Med:363:1693-703, 2010 Diagnostic features of EML4-ALK–positive NSCLC Break-apart FISH (split of red and green probes) Shaw A T et al. JCO 2009;27:4247-4253 ©2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology ALK IHC H&E (arrows denote signet ring cells) Crizotinib: A Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor of c-MET, ALK and ROS1 Kinase IC50 (nM) mean* Selectivity ratio c-MET 8 – ALK 40-60 5-8X ROS1 60 7X RON 80 10X 294 34X 322 37X Tie-2 448 52X Trk A 580 67X Trk B 399 46X Abl 1,159 166X IRK 2,887 334X Lck 2,741 283X Sky >10,000 >1,000X VEGFR2 >10,000 >1,000X PDGFR >10,000 >1,000X Axl Co-crystal structure of crizotinib (PF-02341066) bound to c-MET Cui et al. J Med Chem 54: 6342-63, 2011 and Pfizer data on file Updated Phase I Results: Crizotinib in ALK+ NSCLC Med PFS 9.7 mos Est OS at - 6 mos – 87.9% - 12 mos – 74.8% ORR – 60.8% Camidge DR et al Lancet Oncology 13:1011-19, 2012 Tumor Responses to Crizotinib for Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC – Phase II (PROFILE 1005) 100 % Decrease or Increase From Baseline BOR 80 PD 60 SD PR 40 CR 20 0 –20 –40 –60 –80 * –100 Response Evaluable population, N=123 (excludes patients with early death and indeterminate response). CR = complete response; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; SD = stable disease. *Per RECIST v1.1, percent change from baseline for subjects with best overall response of CR can be <100% when lymph nodes are included as target lesions. Crino ASCO 2011 Crizotinib in Patients With ALK-Positive NSCLC PROFILE 1014 Treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC; Nonsquamous N=334 Primary endpoint: PFS PROFILE 1007 ALK-positive NSCLC; Progressed on 1 prior platinum-containing chemotherapy N=318 Primary endpoint: PFS R A N D O M I Z E R A N D O M I Z E Crizotinib 250 mg bid Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 d1 + investigator’s choice of Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 d1 q3w OR Carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 d1 q3w Crizotinib 250 mg bid Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 d1 q3w OR Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 d1 q3w • Crizotinib recently gained accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration concurrent with a companion break-apart FISH diagnostic • Patients with an ALK mutation tend to have adenocarcinoma, are never- or light formersmokers, and are resistant to EGFR-TKI therapy FISH=fluorescence in situ hybridization. US National Institutes of Health website. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01154140. Accessed 9/13/11; US National Institutes of Health website. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00932893. Accessed 9/13/11; Xalkori [package insert]. New York, NY: Pfizer Inc; 2011. First and Second Generation ALK TKIs in Clinical Development Name Company Status Comments Crizotinib Pfizer 1st and 2nd line registration trials are ongoing. 2nd line trial is >75% accrued Accelerated approval granted August 26, 2011 LDK378 Novartis Phase 1 dose escalation Activity observed at 400 mg. Enrolling in the US and Europe AF802 Chugai Phase 1/2 in Japan and starting in US Activity observed in crizotinib-naïve pts AP26113 Ariad Phase 1 starting this fall Some activity against EGFR T790M. Enrolling in the US ASP3026 Astellos Phase 1 Similar to TAE684. Enrolling in Japan CEP-28122 Cephalon Preclinical NMS-E628 Nerviano Preclinical X276/396 Xcovery Preclinical [TITLE] [TITLE] Clinical Activity of Hsp90 Agents in Advanced NSCLC # pts IPI-5041 AUY9222 Ganetespib3 76 120 99 ORR (%) 7 14 4 ORR/DCR (%) by genotype EGFR mt KRAS mt ALK + 4/21 20/57 0/13 0/42 0/39 0/6 67/100 29/57 50/87 1. Sequist LV et al. J Clin Oncol 28:4953-4960, 2010 2. Garon EB et al. J Clin Oncol 30: ASCO 2012, abstr # 7543 3. Wong K et al. J Clin Oncol 29: ASCO 2011, abstr # 7500 ROS1 ROS Rearrangement in Cancer ROS-POSITIVE CANCERS: • NSCLC – SLC34A2-ROS, CD74-ROS (1-2%) Translocation • Glioblastoma multiforme – FIGROS • Cholangiocarcinoma– FIG-ROS • Other solid tumors ? ROS1 Encodes a Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Brock TG, Receptors and Tyrosine Kinases http://www.caymanchem.com/app/template/Article.vm/article/2187 Crizotinib: A Small Molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor of c-MET, ALK and ROS1 Kinase IC50 (nM) mean* Selectivity ratio c-MET 8 – ALK 40-60 5-8X ROS1 60 7X RON 80 10X 294 34X 322 37X Tie-2 448 52X Trk A 580 67X Trk B 399 46X Abl 1,159 166X IRK 2,887 334X Lck 2,741 283X Sky >10,000 >1,000X VEGFR2 >10,000 >1,000X PDGFR >10,000 >1,000X Axl Co-crystal structure of crizotinib (PF-02341066) bound to c-MET Cui et al. J Med Chem 54: 6342-63, 2011 and Pfizer data on file Summary of Tumor Responses in Patients with Advanced ROS1+ NSCLC (N=14*) Decrease or Increase From Baseline (%) 100 PD 80 SD PR CR 60 40 20 ‡ † 0 15+ –20 16+ 18+ –40 –60 4+ 12+ 8+ 22+ 18 44+ –80 –100 dose to last available on treatment 20+ 35+ 48+ *Response-evaluable population. †Tumor ROS1 FISH-positive, but negative for ROS1 fusion gene expression. ‡Crizotinib held for >6 wks prior to first scans which showed PD. +, Treatment ongoing. Data in the database as of April 19, 2012. Crizotinib Response in ROS1-positive Non-squamous – 4th Line 2/1/2012 On O2, wheelchair-bound, PS 3 3/19/2012 Fully ambulatory, PS 1 BRAF Overview of the MAPK signaling pathway • 2002 – Cancer Genome Project identified BRAF mutations • Occur in ~50% of melanomas (90% V600E) • Serine/threonine kinase • RAF family member (ARAF, BRAF and CRAF) • RAF kinases located downstream of RAS GTPases and upstream of MEK and ERK in MAPK signaling pathway • Mutated BRAF constitutively activates the MAPK pathway Giroux S et al. BMCL Digest 2012 BRAF in NSCLC (Adeno) • Paik PK et J Clin Oncol 29:2046-51, 2011 697 adenos tested for BRAF mutations: 18 found (3%) All were current or former smokers (median pack yrs, 38, range 14-75) Mutually exclusive of EGFR, KRAS and EML4-ALK 50% V600E (6/10 advanced vs 3/8 early) • Marchetti A et al. J Clin Oncol 29:3574-79, 2011 1046 NSCLC tested – 36 (4.9%) adeno, 1 (0.3%) squamous 57% were V600E (more common in females) Mostly smokers (particularly non-V600E) Genotypes Identified in the LCMC Analysis of ~1000 Adenocarcinomas Relative frequency of BRAF mutations in (A) lung adenocarcinoma versus (B) melanoma. Paik P K et al. JCO 2011;29:2046-2051 ©2011 by American Society of Clinical Oncology Figure 8 (A) Representative chemical structures of BRAF inhibitors; (B) Combination therapies involving MEK and HSP90 inhibitors given in combination with BRAF inhibitors in clinical trials for melanomas. Simon Giroux Overcoming acquired resistance to kinase inhibition: The cases of EGFR, ALK and BRAF Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters Volume 23, Issue 2 2013 394 - 401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.11.037 ASCO 2013 Figure 8 (A) Representative chemical structures of BRAF inhibitors; (B) Combination therapies involving MEK and HSP90 inhibitors given in combination with BRAF inhibitors in clinical trials for melanomas. Simon Giroux Overcoming acquired resistance to kinase inhibition: The cases of EGFR, ALK and BRAF Bioorganic &amp; Medicinal Chemistry Letters Volume 23, Issue 2 2013 394 - 401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.11.037 73 year old women with stage IV adenocarcinoma (BRAF V600E mutation) Rec’d 6 cycles of Carbo/pemetrexed/bevacizumab followed by 9 cycles of maintenance pemetrexed → Dabrafenib Baseline 8 weeks later C-MET c-MET Receptor Tyrosine Kinase • Implicated in tumor cell migration, invasion, proliferation, and angiogenesis1 • The only known high-affinity receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)1 • Amplification is assoc. with: • Poor prognosis in NSCLC2 • Resistance to EGFR kinase inhibitors in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC3,4 1. 2. 3. 4. Birchmeier C and Gherardi E. Trends Cell Biol 1998;8:404–10 Cappuzzo F et al. JCO 2009;27:1667–74 Engelman JA et al. Science 2007;316:1039–43 Bean J et al. PNAS 2007;104:20932–7 Activation of Met in Cancer • High Met expression corresponds with higher Met activity MUTANT MET Paracrine HGF LUNG HCC (Childhood) PAPIL. RENAL (Hereditary & Sporadic) 3 7 INCREASED MET AUTOCRINE HGF Paracrine HGF Other Focal Amp BREAST GASTRIC COLORECTAL LUNG ESOPHAGEAL Met CRC GASTRIC GLIOMA HNSCC LUNG MELANOMA MESOTHELIOMA OVARIAN PANCREATIC RENAL GLIOMA OSTEOSARCOMA PANCREATIC GASTRIC HGF/MET Pathway Inhibitors MET HGF Compound Company Target(s) Mechanism Phase MetMAb Genentech MET One-Arm Antibody II ARQ197 ArQule MET Small molecule inhibitor III BMS-777607 BMS MET Small molecule inhibitor I/II INCB-28060 Incyte/Novartis MET Small molecule inhibitor I/II JNJ-38877605 J&J MET Small molecule inhibitor I MGCD-265 Methylgene MET, VEGFRs, Flt3, TIE-2 Small molecule inhibitor I MK-2461 Merck MET Small molecule inhibitor I/II PF02341066) Pfizer MET, ALK Small molecule inhibitor III PF4217903 Pfizer MET Small molecule inhibitor I SGX523 SGX MET Small molecule inhibitor Discontinued XL184 Exelixis MET, VEGFR2, C-kit, Flt-3, TIE-2 Small molecule inhibitor III XL880, (GSK1363089) Exelixis / GSK MET, VEGFR2, C-kit, Flt-3, TIE-2 Small molecule inhibitor II AMG102 Amgen HGF Monoclonal antibody II AV-299 AVEO HGF Monoclonal antibody I/II Antibody TKI Tivantinib: Phase III NSCLC Study MARQUEE Study • Inoperable locally adv or metastatic NSCLC • Non-squamous histology • 1-2 regimens prior chemo (no prior EGFR TKI) • Prior adjuvant/ maintenance therapy allowed R A N D O M I Z E • 1˚Endpoint OS (ITT population) • 2˚/Exploratory Endpoints include: • • • • • PFS (ITT population) OS and PFS in EGFR WT patients Safety and toxicity QOL/FACT-L Biologic sub-groups 39ESMO 2010 Reference: Sequist et al. Erlotinib 150 mg PO QD +ARQ 197 360 mg PO BID 28-day cycle Erlotinib 150 mg PO QD + Placebo 28-day cycle • 988 patients (~ 120 pts enrolled, Aug 2011)* • Stratify by EGFR and KRAS mutation status • Interim analysis performed at 50% of events Tivantinib: Phase III NSCLC Study MARQUEE Study • Inoperable locally adv or metastatic NSCLC • Non-squamous histology • 1-2 regimens prior chemo (no prior EGFR TKI) • Prior adjuvant/ maintenance therapy allowed R A N D O M I Z E Erlotinib 150 mg PO QD +ARQ 197 360 mg PO BID 28-day cycle Negative • 1˚Endpoint OS (ITT population) • 2˚/Exploratory Endpoints include: • • • • • PFS (ITT population) OS and PFS in EGFR WT patients Safety and toxicity QOL/FACT-L Biologic sub-groups 40ESMO 2010 Reference: Sequist et al. Erlotinib 150 mg PO QD + Placebo 28-day cycle • 988 patients (~ 120 pts enrolled, Aug 2011)* • Stratify by EGFR and KRAS mutation status • Interim analysis performed at 50% of events Phase II: Erlotinib +/- MetMAb in 2nd/3rd-line NSCLC MetMAb Arm A 1:1 Key eligibility: • Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC • 2nd/3rd-line NSCLC • Tissue required • PS 0–2 n=137* R A N D O M I Z A T I O N Stratification factors: • Tobacco history • Performance status • Histology (15 mg/kg IV Q3W) + n=69 erlotinib (150 mg daily) Placebo (IV Q3W) + Arm B n=68 erlotinib (150 mg daily) Co-primary objectives: • PFS in ‘Met Diagnostic Positive’ patients (est. 50%) • PFS in overall ITT population Other key objectives: • OS in ‘Met Diagnostic Positive’ pts • OS in overall ITT patients • Overall response rate • Safety/tolerability PD Add MetMAb n=27 Must be eligible to be treated with MetMAb *128 NSCLC patients enrolled from 3/2009 to 3/2010 plus 9 SCC patients enrolled through 8/2010 Data presented includes >5 additional months of follow-up 5 Met IHC as a companion diagnostic ‘Met Diagnostic Positive’ was defined as majority (≥50%) of tumor cells with moderate or strong staining intensity Moderate Weak Strong Ventana’s CONFIRM (SP44 mAb clone) MET mRNA (2-Dct) Negative 1000 Met Dx Negative Met Dx Positive 0 2 100 10 1 0 1 3 MET IHC score • • • Met diagnostic status was assessed after randomization and prior to unblinding 93% of patients had adequate tissue for evaluation of Met by IHC 52% patients with evaluable tissue were “Met Diagnostic Positive” IHC: immunohistochemistry Additional biomarker data are discussed in abstract # 7529 6 MetMAb plus erlotinib in Met Dx+ patients PFS: HR=0.53 OS: HR=0.37 Placebo + MetMAb + erlotinib erlotinib Probability of progression free 0.8 1.5 2.9 1.0 0.53 (0.28–0.99) 0.04 27 20 0.8 Probability of survival Median (mo) HR (95% CI) Log-rank p-value No. of events 1.0 Placebo + MetMAb + erlotinib erlotinib 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 3.8 12.6 Median (mo) 0.37 HR (0.19–0.72) (95% CI) 0.002 Log-rank p-value No. of events 26 16 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 3 6 9 12 15 Time to progression (months) 18 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 Overall survival (months) 9 OAM4971g Global Phase III Clinical Trial NSCLC • Inoperable locally adv/metastatic dz. • MET diagnostic positive • 1-2 regimens prior chemo (no prior EGFR TKI) • Prior adjuvant/ maintenance therapy allowed • 1° Endpoint OS • 2°/Exploratory Endpoints incl: - PFS - OS - Safety and toxicity - QOL/PRO - PK and immunogenicity R A N D O M I Z E Erlotinib 150 mg PO QD +MetMab 15 mg/kg D1 21-day cycle Erlotinib 150 mg PO QD + Placebo 21-day cycle • 480 patients • Stratify by MET score, prior rx, histology, and EGFRmutation status • Interim analysis at 67% of events 44 RET RET ASSOCIATED DISEASES PAPILLARY THYROID CARCINOMA Multiple RET fusion genes Gain of function MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA MEN 2A & 2B Familial Medullary Thyroid Cancer Gain of function HIRSHPRUNG’S DISEASE Loss of function KIF5B EXON 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 202122 23 1 KINESIN MOTOR 2 24 COILED-COIL 25 TAIL 328 329 914 915 963 RET 3 1213 14 15 16 17 18 19 4 CADHERIN 168 TYROSINE KINASE 724 272 1016 1114 KIF5B-RET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 KINESIN MOTOR 2 15 12 13 14 1516 17 18 19 COILED-COIL 328 329 TYROSINE KINASE 575 587 879 978 RET Fusions in NSCLC • Surgical series of 936 patients examined by PCR (with IHC and FISH validation) • 13 cases found (1.4%) - 11 adenos, 2 adenosquamous - 7 women, 6 men - 9 KIF5B-RET, 3 CCDC6-RET, 1 NCOA4-RET - More often poorly differentiated, young (<60 yrs), never smokers (82%), solid subtype Wang R et al. J Clin Oncol 30:4352-59, 2012 Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in current clinical trials, their targets and adverse effects Gild, M. L. et al. (2011) Multikinase inhibitors: a new option for the treatment of thyroid cancer Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2011.141 PI3CKA The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway Papadimitrakopoulou, V. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 7(8):1315-1326, August 2012. © 2012International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2 PI3K- introduction • PI3K is a member of the class IA Phosphatidyl inositol 3 -kinases (PI3Ks), which transduce signals from growth factor receptors and GPCRs, via the generation of the lipid second messenger PIP3. • The opposite reaction is catalysed by a lipid phosphatase called PTEN (phosphate and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10). PI3K PI3K a PI3K d PI3K g Expression Broad Broad Leukocytes Leukocytes Primary Physiological Role RTK signalling Insulin signalling Platelet function B-cell receptor signalling Neutrophil and T cell function Frequency of Mutations Affecting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Papadimitrakopoulou, V. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 7(8):1315-1326, August 2012 © 2012International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. 2 Energy stress GF GRs PI3K inhibitors (e.g., wortmannin, BKM120, BEZ235, PX-866, GDC 0941) GF GRs IRS LKB RAS PI3K Raf PIP3 AMPK AKT inhibitors (e.g., perifosine, PHT427, MK2206) Akt TORC1 and TORC2 inhibitors (e.g., OSI-027, AZD8055, BEZ235) MEK PDK1 SIN1 Rictor TSC2 Rheb ERK RSK mTORC2 mLST8 PRAS40 Rapalogs (e.g., rapamycin, everolimus, temsirolimus, deferolimus) Raptor mTORC1 mLST8 4EBP1 elF4E P70S6K S6 Protein synthesis (Cyclin D, c-Myc, etc.) Non-selective PI3K inhibitors, including PI3K Agent Spectrum DLTs Activity PD/other Perifosine Pan PI3K N, V, D, fatigue SD CoV – 16% GDC-0941 PI3Kα =3nm IC50 “ = 28nm IC50 mTOR N, D, Rash, hypergylycemia Ph II activity in PTEN- pAKT, pS6K SF1126 Pan PI3K N,V,D, pruritus, ↑LFTs SD IV, BIW XL-765 Class I PI3K TORC1 & 2 N,V, ↑ LFTs SD Pathway inhibition at PII doses XL-147 Class I PI3Ks Rash, ↑ LFTs, hyperglycemia SD Pathway inhibition at PII doses BKM 120 Class I PI3Ks CNS, rash, N, D, hypergycemia PR & SD pS6K, 18FDG PET, ↑glucose Alkyl Phospholipid Rash & CNS DLT Conclusions • Beyond EGFR, there are several other “actionable” genotypes • Crizotinib – active in ALK/ROS1 translocated patients, ? met amplification/mutated • BRAF mutations – vemurafenib, dabrafenib • Studies ongoing with specifically targeted agents in molecularly defined populations • Obtaining tissue for genotyping should be a priority • Whether more (NGS) or less (tailored IHC/FISH mutation panels) testing should be done is evolving