Title Slide Option (navy) (Scroll for all color options)

advertisement

Crizotinib outcomes in ALK- positive advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastases

Keith L. Davis, MA, 1 James A. Kaye, MD, DrPH, 2 Shrividya Iyer, PhD 2

1 RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC/United States of

America, 2 RTI Health Solutions, Waltham, MA/United States of

America, 3 Pfizer, Inc. New York, NY/United States of America

Mini Oral Presentation at the 16 th World Conference on Lung Cancer, Sep 6-9, 2015, Denver, CO, USA

Financial Disclosure: This study was sponsored by Pfizer, Inc.

Background

• Brain metastases are reported at initial diagnosis in 15-35% of patients with ALK + metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

(NSCLC) 1-3

• Frequency of brain lesions can increase (up to 46% of ALK + patients by one estimate 4 ) over the course of first-line therapy

• Crizotinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with proven efficacy against ALK + tumors 3,5

• Clinical benefits of crizotinib in ALK + metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases have been documented in trial data 6 and in single-case reports 7

1.

Doebele et al. Cancer 2012;118:4502-11. 2.

Kang et al. Respir Med 2014;108:388-94. 3. Shaw et al. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2385-94.

4. Weickhardt et al. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:1807-1814. 5.

Ou et al. Ann Oncol 2014;25:415-22. 6.

Costa DB et al. J Clin Oncol 2015. [Epub ahead of print].

7.

Kinoshita Y et a.. BMJ Case Rep 2013. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-200867.

2

3

Rationale and Objectives

• The clinical experience of crizotinib-treated patients with

ALK + metastatic NSCLC and brain metastases has not been widely assessed in real-world settings

• To help fill this research gap, we assessed the following in a small cohort of ALK + metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases:

– Demographic and clinical characteristics

– Objective response rate (ORR) of primary tumor during crizotinib treatment and 1-year survival rates from crizotinib initiation

– Status of brain lesions (intracranial response [ICR]) during crizotinib treatment

4

Methods

Retrospective chart review (anonymized data, IRB approved)

• Data abstraction performed in 2014 by pooled sample of 147 oncologists in the US (n = 107) and Canada (n = 40)

• Patient inclusion criteria:

Adults

(age ≥18) diagnosed with

ALK + metastatic NSCLC

Received crizotinib as first- or later-line treatment

First crizotinib treatment received between 8/1/2011 and 3/31/2013 (for US patients), or 4/12/2012 and

3/31/2013 (for Canadian patients)

Complete medical record through last crizotinib dose

Brain metastases present prior to or upon crizotinib initiation

Cohort for main study (n = 212)

See 2016 WCLC

Abstract No. 929

Cohort for present analyses (n = 33)

• Analyses were descriptive and exploratory

Kaplan-Meier (K-M) methods used for 1-year survival rate estimates

Results – Patient Demographics & Clinical Characteristics

5

Demographics

57.6 (11.9) Age at crizotinib initiation, mean (SD)

Sex, n (%)

Male

Female

19 (57.6)

14 (42.4)

Ethnicity, n (%)

White

Black

Asian/Pacific islander

25 (75.8)

5 (15.2)

3 (9.0)

Clinical Characteristics

Deceased at date of chart review, n (%)

10 (30.2)

Current/former smoker, n (%) 22 (66.7)

ECOG at diagnosis, n (%)

0 or 1

2 or 3

Adenocarcinoma histology, n

(%)

Crizotinib treatment duration

(days), median

18 (54.5)

15 (45.5)

28 (84.8)

230

Results – Best Response (Primary Tumor) and Survival

17%

18%

Patients Initiating Crizotinib as

First-Line Tx (n = 22)

4%

13%

48%

Complete response

Partial response

Stable disease

Disease progression

Not assessed

ORR = 61%

20%

Patients Initiating Crizotinib as

Second/Later-Line Tx (n = 11)

20%

60%

Complete response

Partial response

Stable disease

Disease progression

Not assessed

ORR = 60%

6

K-M Estimates of 1-Year Survival Probability from Crizotinib Initiation

Patients Initiating Crizotinib First-Line

Patients Initiating Crizotinib Second/Later-Line

0% 20% 40% 60%

80,7%

77,1%

80% 100%

Results – Status of Brain Lesions During Crizotinib Treatment

Intracranial Response During Crizotinib Treatment

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

27%

14%

41%

18%

44%

11%

22%

22%

Stable Disease

Progressive Disease

Partial Intracranial

Response

Complete Intracranial

Response

First-Line Initiators (n = 22) Second-Line Initiators (n = 11)

• Note: 71% of patients received either whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery prior to crizotinib initiation.

7

8

Study Limitations

Estimates based on small subsample (n = 33) of a larger multinational study

– Small sample size limited study to descriptive, exploratory analyses (no multivariable adjustments for covariates)

Results may not be generalizable to entire ALK + metastatic NSCLC population in the US or Canada

• No covariate adjustments

– ICR, for example, may be confounded by prior treatments (71% rec’d either whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery)

• Convenience sample

– Non-randomized population

– Timing and manner of assessments of ORR and ICR not protocol-driven

(i.e., not assessed at pre-defined intervals, but rather at time points determined by the physicians in regular practice)

• Chart reviews subject to data entry/coding errors

Conclusions

• Complete or partial response of the primary tumor during crizotinib treatment was seen in a majority of patients (ORR

~60%)

• 1-year survival (~80%) was higher than a recent trial-based report of ALK + metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases (~65%) 6

• Results support emerging literature on the possible clinical benefits of crizotinib in ALK + metastatic NSCLC patients with brain metastases

• Findings provide signal that outcomes may be further optimized with earlier (first-line) initiation of crizotinib

6.

Costa DB et al. J Clin Oncol 2015. [Epub ahead of print].

9

Download