RTI International
100 Worst Mistakes in Government Contracting
Post-Award Sections 40, 44, 45-50, 56, 61, 65, 75-78, 80-83
May 2012
Contractor International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
www.rti.org
RTI International
Objective
• Provide a broad overview of the following “post-award”
requirements for Federal contractors.
• Service Contract Act
• Limitation of Cost & Limitation of Funds
• Options
• No Cost Time Extensions
• Terminations
• Examine various sections within the book that cover topics
around these “post-award” concepts
RTI International
Service Contract Act
Contractor International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
www.rti.org
RTI International
Service Contract Act (SCA)
Book Chapters:
• 44 & 50
FAR Clause:
• Prescribed in FAR 22.1006
• 52.222.41, Service Contract Act of 1965
RTI International
Overview of “Service Contract Act” Clause
•
•
•
5
Applies to service contracts over $2,500
Mandates
•
minimum wages and benefits
•
safe and sanitary working conditions
•
notification to employees of the minimum
allowable compensation
•
equivalent Federal employee classifications and
wage rates.
Mandatory flowdown clause to all subcontracts.
RTI International
Wage Determination
•
Department of Labor (DOL)-issued Wage Determination (WD)
•
Represents “prevailing” wages for a given geographic
locale
•
Applies based on place of performance
•
Provides sample description
•
SCA Directory of Occupations is basis for labor categories
included
6
RTI International
“Mistakes”: Service Contract Act
•
Failure to claim a price adjustment due to increased
labor costs as the result of a new wage determination or
collective bargaining agreement could mean that the
government will not be obligated to pay the contractor
above the amount specified in the wage determination in
place at the time of award.
•
Contractors are also entitled to a price adjustment where
there is an increased cost in continued compliance with
pre-existing wage determinations or Collective
Bargaining Agreements (CBA).
RTI International
“Mistakes”: Service Contract Act
•
Failure to pay the minimum wages and benefits required
by a wage determination in a contract subject to the SCA
may result in severe sanctions including financial
penalties, debarment, and criminal prosecution.
•
Failure to request a price adjustment when the wage
determination is revised may result in inability to recover
the difference.
RTI International
Example: Service Contract Act
•
•
•
•
•
Fixed Price (FP) contract with SCA clause
Original WD rate = $14.00/hr
Employee’s actual rate = $14.30/hr
WD rate is revised and new WD rate is $15.00/hr
Contractor either
• A) fails to increase the employee’s actual rate to at
least $15.00/hr
• B) increases the Employee’s actual rate but fails to
request an adjustment (allowable at $0.70/hr)
RTI International
Limitation of Cost/Limitation of Funds
Contractor International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
www.rti.org
RTI International
Limitation of Cost & Limitation of Funds
Book Chapter:
• 56
FAR Clauses:
• Prescribed in FAR 32.705-2:
•
52.232-20, Limitation of Cost, found in fully
funded cost-reimbursement (CR) contracts
• 52.232-22, Limitation of Funds, found in
incrementally funded contracts
• Cost Reimbursement contract must contain one
or the other.
RTI International
Purpose of LOF/LOC Clauses
•
Provides the government with an option for the action to
be taken when notified by the contractor that additional
funds will be required to complete the work.
RTI International
Overview of LOF/LOC Clauses
•
•
•
It is expected that performance of the contract will not cost the
Government more than the estimated cost specified in the Schedule.
The government is not required to reimburse contractor for any
costs incurred above the estimated costs.
Prior approval must be obtained per the following process:
•
•
•
•
Contractor must notify the Contracting Officer (CO) in writing when it anticipates
that within the next 60 days it will exceed seventy-five percent of the estimated
cost and provide a revised estimate;
Contractor must notify the CO that the total cost of the contract will be
significantly greater than estimated;
The CO must notify Contractor in writing that the estimated cost has been
increased by a specific amount or that the scope has been reduced; AND
Until the CO gives such notice, Contractor is not required to continue
performance or incur costs that exceed those estimated in the contract.
13
RTI International
Overview of LOF/LOC Clauses
•
•
•
•
If Contractor does not receive advance approval,
Contractor has the right to refuse work that will cause us
to exceed the estimated costs.
If Contractor fails to provide notice and overruns the
contract, the government is not obligated to reimburse
Contractor for the overrun.
After receiving notice of the anticipated overrun, the CO
has the discretion to approve additional funding, modify
the work scope to prevent the overrun, or terminate the
contract.
Contractor must comply with the CO’s written decision in
order to obtain reimbursement.
RTI International
“Mistakes”: LOF/LOC Clauses
•
Failure to monitor a cost-reimbursement contract, or to
report costs incurred to the CO as required, could mean
that the government will not be obligated to pay the
contractor above the estimated amount set forth in the
contract.
Contractors have amassed an extremely low batting
average of winning appeals when they fail to give proper
advance notice of overruns under the LOF/LOC clauses.
RTI International
Example: LOF/LOC Clauses
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract with LOC clause.
During period of performance, contractor incurs an increase in
overhead and administrative costs, triggering the reporting
requirements under the LOC clause.
Contractor’s accounting records reflected the increase.
Court held that contractor knew, or should have known, that indirect
costs incurred exceeded the rates specified in the contract.
Contractor claimed that “pressures of work” kept them from
providing proper notification to the Government.
Court rejected claim noting that the Contractor has a duty to monitor
costs and is obligated to report under LOC clause.
The requirement for determination of final indirect rates per audit
does not excuse failure to provide earlier notice during contract
performance.
RTI International
Additional Reference
NCMA Article: “Cost Limitations in Government Contracts”
by Christopher Wolfe (May 2010)
http://www.ncmahq.org/files/AContractorcles/CM0510%20%2032-43.pdf
RTI International
Options
Contractor International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
www.rti.org
RTI International
Options
Book Chapters:
• 45-49
FAR Clauses:
• Prescribed in FAR 17.2
• FAR 52.217-6, Option for Increased Quantity
• FAR 52.217-7, Option for Increased Quantity, Separately
Priced Line Item
• FAR 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services
• FAR 52.217-9, Option to Extend the Term of the
Contract
RTI International
Overview of “Option” Clauses
•
Unilateral
•
Only the government can exercise them if:
• funds are available,
• there is a government need,
• offers the most advantages route, and
• was synopsized, if required.
•
If an option is exercised, contractor must perform.
RTI International
Types of Options
•
Option Years
•
•
Option Quantities
•
•
Under Multiyear contracts, the Government typically awards a
base year + up to nine (9) option years. The option years are
priced as part of the initial proposal and contract award.
The Government may include pricing in the contract for additional
items or quantities. Typically, these options can be exercised
more than once during the specified period.
Option to Extend
•
Under Service Contracts, the Government can “request”
continued service for up to 6 months (in single or multiple
contract actions) beyond contracted Period Of Performance
within the limits and at rates specified in contract.
RTI International
Process for Exercising Options
•
Options should be exercised in strict accordance with the
terms of the contract.
•
•
Inclusion of an option in a contract does not obligate the government
to exercise it, but creates an expectation that the contractor will
perform the option under the terms of the contract if requested.
Contracts may include language requiring notice of intent 60
days in advance.
•
If the Government fails to comply with this requirement, the exercising
of the option becomes unilateral.
RTI International
“Mistakes”: Options
•
Performance or incurring costs prior to receiving a signed
modification exercising the option is at your own risk.
•
•
May require internal approval.
May cause issues if effective date of modification is not back-dated.
•
A letter of intent to award or modify is not a contract.
•
An unfunded contract is not a contract.
RTI International
No Cost Time Extensions
Contractor International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
www.rti.org
RTI International
No Cost Time Extensions
Book Chapters:
• 40, 51, 65
RTI International
No Cost Time Extensions
Example:
It is virtually certain that the FP project will not produce the final deliverable
within the contract period of performance and we have asked for a no cost
time extension. The Government is not a factor in our inability to deliver on
time.
Discussion:
Failure to deliver on time under this example is a major risk to the
Contractor since the Government has the right to terminate for default
immediately without providing a Cure Notice or Show Cause letter. Also, not
offering consideration under this scenario, where a termination for default is
a real possibility, is like adding insult to injury.
Solution:
Recognize the potential consequences of such a delay and apply sufficient
resources to the project to ensure timely delivery.
RTI International
No Cost Time Extensions
Example:
It is virtually certain that the FP project will not produce the final deliverable within
the contract period of performance and we have asked for a no cost time
extension. The Government is a significant factor in our inability to deliver on time.
Discussion
Has the impact of the Government delay been communicated?
Does their delay cause cost exposure and is a no cost time extension appropriate?
Is the action or inaction of the Government the primary contributor to the delay?
Solution:
Provide notification(s) to the Contracting Officer and the Contracting Officer’s
Technical Representative that the Government delays have the potential of causing
schedule and cost impacts.
RTI International
No Cost Time Extensions
Regardless of the contractual rules and possible outcomes,
missing due dates have consequences – some can be
worked around but none are convenient for the
customer.
RTI International
Terminations
Contractor International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute.
www.rti.org
RTI International
Terminations
Book Chapters:
• 75-78, and 80-83
FAR Clauses:
• Prescribed in FAR 49.5
• FAR 52.249, Various Termination Clauses for
Convenience/Default and Fixed Price/CostReimbursement
RTI International
Overview of “Termination for Default”
• Government is only liable to pay for accepted work
• Contractor is liable for reprocurement costs
• Example: Contract was valued at $1M. The reprocured contract value is
$1.5M. Contractor may owe the Government an additional $500K beyond the
costs that were not paid by the Government for unaccepted work.
• Must be disclosed in future Past Performance sections of
federal procurements for 3 years.
• Multiple (as few as two) terminations for default over a short
time period could cause Contractor to be listed on the
Debarred List.
RTI International
Overview of “Termination for Convenience”
• Government has the unilateral right to terminate for
convenience at any time and for any appropriate reason.
• Contractor can receive:
•
•
•
•
Contract price for completed work
Costs incurred for work terminated
Cost of subcontract termination settlement proposals
Reasonable costs of settlement (accounting, legal, clerical, and
other expenses incurred to submit proposal), storage, and
transportation.
• Should be avoided, if possible, for at least two reasons;
1) Loss of revenue and profit
2) Potential reputational damage
RTI International
Responding to Termination Notices
Example:
You receive a formal Cure Notice from the Contracting Officer informing us that the
Agency believes that there are sufficient performance reasons that the contract
should be terminated for default and asks us to either cure the default or explain
why the termination should not be made.
Consider:
A termination for default has such reputational damage for future proposal
opportunities that any and all terminations for default, regardless of the contract
size, need immediate, broad and Senior Management attention.
Request a meeting to learn as much as possible as quickly as possible.
Solutions:
• Prepare a full and forceful response with clear and convincing
evidence of either how we can cure the default or why the default is
inappropriate.
• Consider a No-Cost Termination in lieu of termination for default.
• Submit the response on or before the due date.
RTI International
Example:
Avoiding Termination Notices
For various reasons, you are substantially behind schedule with key/important
deliverables
Consider:
•
Delays are due to Government actions or inactions (e.g., untimely OMB
clearance for survey tool).
• Delays are due to Force Majeure (act of God)
• Delays are due to poor subcontractor performance
• Delays are due to poor Contractor performance
Solutions:
• When delays are due to Government actions or inactions, or Force
Majeure, provide official notice to the Client of expected delay with a
proposed/revised delivery schedule.
• When delays are due to poor subcontractor or Contractor performance,
provide a project schedule recovery plan.
RTI International
Termination for Convenience
Example:
Contractor receives a Termination for Convenience during the 3rd year of a 5 year
contract. In accordance with FAR 52.249 (e), the contractor has one year from the
date of notice to submit a final termination settlement proposal.
Consider:
•
What type of contract (FP vs. CR)?
• Are there 5 year commitments to subcontractors (e.g., leases)?
• What type of Subcontract (FP, Time and Material (T&M), CR)?
• If FP Prime, is the contractor in a profit or loss circumstance?
Solutions:
•
Take reasonable steps to mitigate Government cost exposure.
• Seek a “reasonable and fair” settlement.
• Submit your Settlement Proposal on time.
RTI International
Questions?