Analysis of Student Work Coordinator and Think Tank Update Broadcast: Wednesday, July 16 1:00 – 3:00 p.m. ASW Reality vs. Rumor Activity NC Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students. Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach. Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice. Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students. NC Educator Evaluation System Overview of Standard 6 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice 6 Contribute to Academic Success 3 Rating Categories Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth Overview of Standard 6 Contribute to Academic Success 6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 Career Technical Education Assessment 6 NC Final Exams 6 K-3 Checkpoints 6 Analysis of Student Work Analysis of Student Work In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Contribute to Academic Success Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process. 6 Analysis of Student Work Analysis of Student Work Process • Fall 2011 Design Groups • Spring 2013 ASW Pilot • 2013 – 2014 ASW Pilot ASW 2014 Pilot Participants Over 1100 NC Educators Representing Regions 8 Advanced Placement Arts Education Healthful Living International Baccalaureate Content Areas Occupational Preparation 7th Grade Social Studies World History World Languages Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now. Overview of ASW Process Overview of the ASW Process Teacher verifies schedule and chooses objectives for each course Teacher collects TAs of student work Teacher Uploads Evidence Collection to Online Platform Reviewers rate Evidence Collections Teacher receives category rating for Standard 6 Overview of the ASW Process Overview of the ASW Process ASW Process: A Quick Guide Overview of the ASW Process Items needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA): • A specific objective measured over 2 distinct points in time • Work Sample Options: Student or Whole Class • Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting • 2 work samples • Context Overview of the ASW Process Objectives: Using the Strands and Standards guidance charts, 5 objectives will be chosen. Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now. Overview of the ASW Process Work Samples: Option 1 – Student Work Samples Collect and keep 2 work samples: • for each class member • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time Overview of the ASW Process Work Samples: Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples 2 work samples that represent the entire class • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time Overview of the ASW Process Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting: Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TA will be compiled using the Student Work Samples from these selected students. TA 1 Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling. TA 1 Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Context for 1st work sample How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? 1 1 1 Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Context for 2nd work sample How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? 2 2 2 Overview of the ASW Process 2 Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples Context for Growth Describe the growth that occurred between points one and two. 1 2 1 2 1 Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples 2 1 2 1 Timelapse Artifact 1 2 1 Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples Be sure to keep the Whole Class Work Samples If the composition of your class changes, do not worry, submit your two work samples. 1 #2Timelapse Artifact Work Sample 1 Work Sample 2 Overview of the ASW Process Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples Whole Class Work Sample 1 1 Timelapse Artifact Whole Class Work Sample 2 Overview of the ASW Process TA 3 Student Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform. TA 1 Student TA 4 Student TA 2 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class Questions about the previous section? Type them in the question box now. Principal’s Input Ensure Teacher Participation Principal’s Input Principal meets with the teacher to ensure that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Some examples of meetings: • PDPs • teacher meetings Principal’s Input The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher. TA 1 Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. Meets Expected Growth Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2 Overview of the ASW Process Blind Review: If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. Reviewer #3 Exceeds Expected Growth Reviewer #1 Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #2 Overview of the ASW Process 2-Step ASW Process Review: Evidence Collection Checklist ASW Quality Rubric Overview of the ASW Process Evidence Collection Rating Form: • D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below: TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5 Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection Does Not Meet DDDDD DDDDE DDDDM DDDEE DDDME DDDMM Meets MMMMM MMMME DMMMM MMMEE DDMMM DMMME DDMME DDMEE DMMEE Exceeds EEEEE MEEEE MMEEE DEEEE DMEEE DDEEE Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth NC Educator Evaluation System Overview of Standard 6 1 2 3 4 5 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment Know Content 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice Contribute to Academic Success 6 3 Rating Categories 3-Year Rolling Average Standard Standard 6 Year 1 Standard 6 Year 2 6 Year 3 An educator receives an effectiveness status only after he or she has 3 years of data on Standard 6 A 3-year rolling average of growth data from Standard 6 is used as part of determining overall status Demonstration of 3-Year Rolling Average for 2014-2017 Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average of growth data: Standard Standard Standard Year 1 2014-2015 Year 2 2015-2016 Year 3 2016-2017 Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth 6 6 6 2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2) + 2016-17 Meets (Year 3) Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average for 2014-2017 Contribute Meets Expected Growth to Academic Success Effectiveness Status Effectiv for 2016 - 2017 e 2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership X Standard 2 Establish Environment X Standard 3 Know Content X X Standard 4 Facilitate Learning Standard 5 Reflect on Practice Standard 6 Three year rolling average Accomplished Distinguished X 3 year rolling average for 2014 – 2017 Meets Expected Growth ASW Wikispace • Online Training Modules • Important Forms • Frequently Asked Questions Visit the Wiki here: http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ Regional Training Schedule – August, 2014 (Known locations available on the ASW Wikispace) Regions 1 & 2 Region 3 Region 4 Region 5 Region 6 Region 7 Region 8 Combined 7 &8 August 12 August 19 August 6 August 14 August 15 August 21 August 22 August 8 Questions about ASW Process Jennifer DeNeal Race to the Top Project Coordinator for Educator Effectiveness North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Have a question about educator effectiveness? Send an email to: educatoreffectiveness@dpi.nc.gov Questions about Educator Effectiveness North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Have a question about Educator Effectiveness? visit www.ncpublicschools.org/ effectiveness-model or http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/NC EES+Wiki