Overview of
ASW Process
Effectiveness Status
NC Educator Evaluation System
1 2 3 4 5
Demonstrate
Leadership
Establish
Environment
Know
Content
5 Rating Categories
Not Demonstrated
Developing
Proficient
Accomplished
Distinguished
Facilitate
Learning
Reflect on
Practice
Contribute
to
Academic
Success
6
3 Rating Categories
Overview of Standard 6
Contribute
to Academic
Success
6
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests
6
Career Technical Education Assessment
6
NC Final Exams
6
K-3 Checkpoints
6
Analysis of Student Work
Analysis of Student Work
In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6
measure for teachers in Advanced
Placement, Arts Education, Healthful
Living, International Baccalaureate, and
World Languages.
Contribute
to Academic
Success
Growth is based on student work
submitted by teachers and rated by
content experts in a “blind review”
process.
6
Analysis of Student Work
Overview: Analysis of Student Work
ASW Process
ASW Process: A Quick Guide
Teaching Context
• Screen shot
Principal’s Input
Principal receives a notification once a teacher’s
schedule has been validated. The principal will
then log into the Online Platform to confirm that the
schedule is correct.
Class Selection
Beginning in 2014 – 2015,
the online platform will
select the classes in which
the teacher must collect
artifacts.
Objective Selection
Objectives:
Using the
Strands and
Standards
guidance charts,
the teacher will
choose 5
objectives.
Principal’s Input
Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the
5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the
Strands & Standards Guidance Chart
Some examples of meetings:
• PDPs
• teacher meetings
5 Timelapse Artifacts
Teacher decisions needed to
compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA):
a) A specific objective
b) Sample type
• Individual Student
or
• Whole Class
c) Collection Method
d) Samples from Point 1 and Point 2
e) Context
Time passes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Teachers Collect
Work Samples for
Timelapse Artifacts
Student Selection
Timelapse Artifact
Option 1 –
Individual Student
Work Samples
Online platform will select
3 students
The TA will be compiled
using the Individual
Student Work Samples
from these selected
students.
TA 1
Student Selection
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 –
Individual Student
Work Samples
If a student work sample
is unavailable, that
student will be reshuffled
and another student
will be selected.
TA 1
Principal’s Input
The Principal is notified
when a reshuffle is used
by a teacher.
TA 1
Upload Evidence
Context for 1st work sample in each Timelapse
Artifact
How does this artifact
show where the student
is in relation to the
chosen clarifying
objective?
How does this artifact show where the
student is in relation to the chosen
clarifying objective?
This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class
containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the
student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following
ways.
1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist.
2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper
chest.
3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow.
4. The elbows are bending during the compression.
Upload Evidence
Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact
Describe the growth
that occurred between
Points 1 and 2.
Describe the growth that occurred
between Points 1 and 2.
CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given
the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow
and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival
Upload Evidence
TA 3
Student
All 5 Timelapse Artifacts
will be uploaded
to the online platform
as the teacher’s
Evidence Collection
for the school year.
TA 1
Student
TA 4
Student
TA 2
Whole
Class
TA 5
Whole
Class
Blind Review
The Evidence Collection
will be reviewed by
2 content area
specialists.
D
Reviewer #1
Reviewer #2
M
E
Blind Review
If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not
the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically
sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get
a rating for that year.
Reviewer #3
M
Reviewer #1
E
Reviewer #2
Effectiveness Status
3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6
Standard
Standard
6
Year 1
Standard
6
Year 2
6
Year 3
An educator receives an
Effectiveness Status
when he or she has 3
years of their own data
for Standard 6
Questions about Educator
Effectiveness, NCEES or ASW
Visit
www.ncpublicschools.org/effectiveness-model
or
http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/
NCEES+Wiki
or
ASW Wiki at http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/
You can also email questions to
bglendenning@wcpss.net for Healthful Living
Egrimes-droessler@wcpss.net for the Arts
Dramirez-carter@wcpss.net for World Languages
Sgolden-perry@wcpss.net for AP/IB
ehiggins@wcpss.net for Course Codes