SHARED GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE
SELF-EVALUATION FORM
Shared Governance Committee: ___Student Support Services Committee____
Evaluation for Academic Year: ___2009 - 2010_____
1. Please indicate the dates of each of your meetings in the past year.
Are the minutes of these meetings all posted on your web site?
The Committee met a total of eleven times during ’09 – ’10: 6/04/10, 7/28/09, 8/18/10,
9/15/10, 10/13/10, no meeting in November ’09, 12/15/10, no meeting in January ’10,
3/02/10 (substitute for February ’10 meeting), 3/16/10, 4/08/10, 4/27/10 and 5/18/10.
With the exception of the May ’10 minutes, all minutes have been posted.
2. What would you consider to be the main accomplishments/tasks that your committee
achieved this academic year?
1. Completion of Student Services Program Reviews
2. Second cycle of SS Program Review was established.
3. Through the ASO Representative, able to provide guidance and assistance to
some activities on campus.
4. Assisted with the planning of Student Services Day.
5. The establishment of a Student Success Task Force, starting with a Pre-requisite
committee to review the process of pre-requisites.
6. Established the groundwork to establish a Community Advisory Group to assist
with Student Success. This group will consist of LAMC personnel, a
representative from CSU, UC, private college/university, local high school and
middle school, and educational partners such as Project Grad.
3. What prioritized goals for this year were you unable to complete or are still in
progress?
The committee is still working on the following goal: To provide information for
students, staff, and faculty through media and technology
4. Please list your prioritized goals for the next academic year.
Goals have not been prioritized as of our May ’10 meeting. We will meet in June ’10 to
work on them.
5. Does your charter accurately reflect the committee’s focus? If not, please explain.
Yes.
6. Is membership tenure reflected accurately on the web site?
Yes.
7. Is your membership adequate to meet the work challenges of the committee?
At this time, yes.
8. Please list the dates that one or both of the co chairs of your committee attended the
SGTF monthly meetings.
It is believed that between Joe S. Ramirez and Kelly Enos, all SGTF monthly meetings
were attended.
9. Do you have any suggestions for the SGTF that could improve our Shared Governance
process or make it more efficient?
The meeting time may be a problem. To go from noon to 1 – 1:30 pm and then sit
through the College Council meeting may be too much. Attendance at the meetings was
not what it was last year and perhaps this was the reason. We might consider moving the
meeting to a date, not on the same day as the College Council meeting.
SIGNATURES: _________________________________Co-Chair
_________________________________Co-Chair
_________________Date