QUEENSBOROUGHCOMMUNITYCOLLEGE
ProgramReviewData
Packet
InternetTechnology(EM‐A.A.S.)
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment 11/7/2014 Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
Table of Contents
A. Enrollment and Student Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
Student Profile & Headcount
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Gender and Age
Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Language Spoken at Home
Student Admit Type (e.g. first‐time freshmen, advanced transfer)
Freshmen and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
7
8
Student Preparedness College Admission Average (CAA): High School GPA of First‐time Freshmen
Placement Test Results
B. Institutional Effectiveness
1
2
3
Remedial vs Non Remedial
Remedial vs Non Remedial Enrollment
Remedial Course Grades Non‐remedial Course Grades 4
5
6
7
8
9
Graduation and Retention Rates
One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Three‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Four‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Degrees Awarded
Transfer Rates and College Destinations
C. Courses and Curriculum
Courses by Supporting Departments: Historical Trends 2008‐2013
1 Required Courses ‐‐ Average Grades: Fall
Grade Point Average
2 First Semester GPA
3 First Year GPA
4 Graduation GPA
Page 1 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
Table of Contents (Cont'd)
D. Faculty and Staff
1
Staff categories and faculty profile (appointment status, gender, ethnicity and highest degree earned)
Faculty Members:
2
List of faculty members
Source: IRDB
Page 2 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A. Enrollment and Student Profile
1
2
3
4
5
6
Student Profile & Headcount
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Gender and Age
Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Language Spoken at Home
Student Admit Type (e.g. first‐time freshmen, advanced transfer)
Freshmen and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
7
8
Student Preparedness College Admission Average (CAA): High School GPA of First‐time Freshmen
Placement Test Results
Page 3 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.1. Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE
Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status
F‐TIME
P‐TIME
Total
31
26
57
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
54.4% 26
56.5% 30
61.2% 28
62.2% 42
71.2% 40
69.0% 37
56.1% 41
65.1% 41
65.1% 44
72.1% 37
63.8%
45.6% 20
43.5% 19
38.8% 17
37.8% 17
28.8% 18
31.0% 29
43.9% 22
34.9% 22
34.9% 17
27.9% 21
36.2%
100% 46
100% 49
100% 45
100% 59
100% 58
100% 66
100% 63
100% 63
100% 61
100% 58
100%
Part‐time and Full‐time
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
45.6%
43.5%
38.8%
37.8%
28.8%
31.0%
43.9%
34.9%
34.9%
27.9%
36.2%
70.0%
60.0%
PART‐TIME
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
54.4%
56.5%
61.2%
62.2%
Fall '08
Spring '09
Fall '09
Spring '10
71.2%
69.0%
56.1%
65.1%
65.1%
Spring '12
Fall '12
72.1%
FULL‐TIME
63.8%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall '10
Spring '11
Fall '11
Page 4 of 29
Spring '13
Fall '13
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.1. Headcount by Part‐time/Full‐time Status and FTE (Cont'd)
FTE* Count (Full‐time equivalency)
Fall 08 Sp 09 Fall 09 Sp 10 Fall 10 Sp 11 Fall 11 Sp 12 Fall 12 Sp 13 Fall 13
37
33
35
33
46
45
49
48
49
48
46
FTE
Full‐time Equivalency (FTE*) Student Count
60
46
50
40
37
33
35
49
45
48
49
48
46
33
30
20
10
0
*Full‐time equivalent (FTE) is a standardized measure of enrollment equal to a full‐time load of credits. It is calculated by summing the total credits and equated credits associated with course enrollment and dividing by 15.
Page 5 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.2. Student Gender
Gender
Women
Men
Total
10
47
57
Fall 2008
17.5%
82.5%
100%
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
6
13.0% 8
16.3% 8
17.8% 11
18.6% 8
13.8% 12
18.2%
40
87.0% 41
83.7% 37
82.2% 48
81.4% 50
86.2% 54
81.8%
46
100% 49
100% 45
100% 59
100% 58
100% 66
100%
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
11 17.5% 12
19.0%
52 82.5% 51
81.0%
63 100% 63
100%
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
12
19.7% 10
17.2%
49
80.3% 48
82.8%
61
100% 58
100%
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
4
15.4% 5
16.7% 5
17.9% 8
19.0% 5
12.5% 7
18.9% 9
22.0% 9
22.0%
22
84.6% 25
83.3% 23
82.1% 34
81.0% 35
87.5% 30
81.1% 32 78.0% 32
78.0%
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
10
22.7% 7
30.0%
34
77.3% 30
81.1%
Gender by Full‐time/Part‐time Status
Full‐Time Women
Men
8
23
Fall 2008
25.8%
74.2%
Full‐Time 31
100%
26
100% 30
100% 28
100% 42
100% 40
100% 37
100% 41
100% 41
100%
44
100% 37
100%
Part‐Time
Women
Men
Part‐Time
2
24
26
7.7%
92.3%
100%
2
18
20
10.0% 3
90.0% 16
100% 19
15.8% 3
84.2% 14
100% 17
17.6% 3
82.4% 14
100% 17
17.6% 3
82.4% 15
100% 18
16.7% 5
83.3% 24
100% 29
17.2% 2
82.8% 20
100% 22
9.1% 3
90.9% 19
100% 22
13.6%
86.4%
100%
2
15
17
11.8% 3
88.2% 18
100% 21
14.3%
85.7%
100%
6
10
19
6
8
8
0
57
Fall 2008
10.5%
17.5%
33.3%
10.5%
14.0%
14.0%
0.0%
100%
Age
UNDER 19
19
20 ‐ 22
23 ‐ 24
25 ‐ 29
30 ‐ 44
45 & OVER
Total
Spring 2009
5
10.9%
7
15.2%
15
32.6%
4
8.7%
9
19.6%
5
10.9%
1
2.2%
46
100%
8
8
12
8
8
3
2
49
Fall 2009
16.3%
16.3%
24.5%
16.3%
16.3%
6.1%
4.1%
100%
Spring 2010
5
11.1%
7
15.6%
14
31.1%
7
15.6%
9
20.0%
2
4.4%
1
2.2%
45
100%
11
11
14
6
11
5
1
59
Fall 2010
18.6%
18.6%
23.7%
10.2%
18.6%
8.5%
1.7%
100%
Spring 2011
5
8.6%
12
20.7%
21
36.2%
10
17.2%
5
8.6%
4
6.9%
1
1.7%
58
100%
Page 6 of 29
7
10
28
9
7
5
0
66
Fall 2011
10.6%
15.2%
42.4%
13.6%
10.6%
7.6%
0.0%
100%
Spring 2012
6
9.5%
10 15.9%
26 41.3%
8
12.7%
8
12.7%
5
7.9%
0
0.0%
63 100%
8
6
28
6
10
4
1
63
Fall 2012
12.7%
9.5%
44.4%
9.5%
15.9%
6.3%
1.6%
100%
Spring 2013
4
6.6%
8
13.1%
25
41.0%
4
6.6%
11
18.0%
6
9.8%
3
4.9%
61
100%
5
12
18
6
10
5
2
58
Fall 2013
8.6%
20.7%
31.0%
10.3%
17.2%
8.6%
3.4%
100%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.3. Ethnicity Imputed (IPEDS count)
Black Non‐Hispanic
Nonresident Alien
N Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Fall 13
11
9
5
5
8
7
5
6
6
6
6
%
19.3%
19.6%
10.2%
11.1%
13.6%
12.1%
7.6%
9.5%
9.5%
9.8%
10.3%
N American Indian or Native Alaskan
%
11
8
9
5
12
10
15
17
13
12
8
N 19.3%
17.4%
18.4%
11.1%
20.3%
17.2%
22.7%
27.0%
20.6%
19.7%
13.8%
Asian or Pacific Islander
%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.4%
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2
1
N 7
6
7
9
13
10
11
6
8
10
15
Hispanic
%
12.3%
13.0%
14.3%
20.0%
22.0%
17.2%
16.7%
9.5%
12.7%
16.4%
25.9%
White Non‐Hispanic
N 17
11
17
18
19
17
20
19
17
17
17
%
29.8%
23.9%
34.7%
40.0%
32.2%
29.3%
30.3%
30.2%
27.0%
27.9%
29.3%
N 11
12
11
8
5
13
15
15
19
16
12
Total
%
19.3%
26.1%
22.4%
17.8%
8.5%
22.4%
22.7%
23.8%
30.2%
26.2%
20.7%
57
46
49
45
59
58
66
63
63
61
58
Ethnicity
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
19.3%
29.8%
12.3%
19.3%
26.1%
22.4%
17.8%
34.7%
40.0%
8.5%
22.4%
22.7%
23.8%
29.3%
30.3%
30.2%
17.2%
16.7%
9.5%
20.3%
17.2%
22.7%
13.6%
12.1%
Fall '10
Spring '11
26.2%
27.0%
27.9%
12.7%
16.4%
25.9%
27.0%
20.6%
19.7%
13.8%
7.6%
9.5%
9.5%
9.8%
10.3%
Fall '11
Spring '12
Fall '12
Spring '13
Fall '13
32.2%
23.9%
22.0%
13.0%
17.4%
19.3%
19.6%
Fall '08
Spring '09
Nonresident Alien
14.3%
20.0%
18.4%
10.2%
11.1%
11.1%
Fall '09
Spring '10
Black, Non‐Hispanic
20.7%
30.2%
Asian or Pacific Islander
Hispanic
29.3%
White, Non‐Hispanic
* American Indian or Native Alaskan less than 1% ‐ not shown in chart
Page 7 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.4. Language Spoken at Home
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
LANG. OTHER THAN ENGLISH
25
43.9% 21
45.7% 23
46.9% 21
46.7% 26
44.1% 20
34.5% 28
42.4% 22
34.9% 24
38.1% 18
29.5% 21
36.2%
ENGLISH ONLY
23
40.4% 12
26.1% 18
36.7% 15
33.3% 22
37.3% 21
36.2% 18
27.3% 22
34.9% 19
30.2% 15
24.6% 13
22.4%
UNKNOWN
9
15.8% 13
28.3% 8
16.3% 9
20.0% 11
18.6% 17
29.3% 20
30.3% 19
30.2% 20
31.7% 28
45.9% 24
41.4%
57
100% 46
100% 49
100% 45
100% 59
100% 58
100% 66
100% 63
100% 63
100% 61
100% 58
100%
Total
Percent of Students Who Speak a Language Other Than English at Home
50.0%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
43.9%
45.7%
46.9%
46.7%
44.1%
42.4%
34.9%
34.5%
38.1%
36.2%
29.5%
Fall '08
Spring '09
Fall '09
Spring '10
Fall '10
Spring '11
Page 8 of 29
Fall '11
Spring '12
Fall '12
Spring '13
Fall '13
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.5. Admit Type
Fall 2008
First Time Freshmen
Advanced Transfer
Other
Degree Readmit
Continuing Degree
Total
Spring 2009
9
15.8% 2
4.3%
5
0
8.8%
0.0%
6
0
5
8.8%
2
38
57
66.7% 36
100% 46
Fall 2009
10
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
20.4% 2
4.4%
9
15.3% 2
3.4%
7
10.6% 0
0.0%
12
19.0% 1
1.6%
8
13.8%
13.0% 4
0.0% 0
8.2%
0.0%
2
0
4.4%
0.0%
3
0
5.1%
0.0%
2
0
3.4%
0.0%
4
0
6.1%
0.0%
1
0
1.6%
0.0%
2
0
3.2%
0.0%
3
0
4.9%
0.0%
2
0
3.4%
0.0%
4.3%
12.2% 3
6.7%
3
5.1%
3
5.2%
8
12.1% 5
7.9%
4
6.3%
7
11.5% 4
6.9%
59.2% 38
100% 45
84.4% 44
100% 59
71.2% 57
100% 63
90.5% 45
100% 63
82.0% 44
100% 58
75.9%
100%
6
78.3% 29
100% 49
74.6% 51
100% 58
87.9% 47
100% 66
71.4% 50
100% 61
New to Continuing Student Ratio (Fall)
100%
90%
15.8%
80%
8.8%
20.4%
15.3%
5.1%
10.6%
6.1%
19.0%
13.8%
3.4%
3.2%
8.2%
70%
First Time Freshmen
60%
Advanced Transfer
50%
40%
Other
75.4%
71.4%
Fall '08
Fall '09
79.7%
83.3%
Fall '10
Fall '11
77.8%
82.8%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Page 9 of 29
Fall '12
Fall '13
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.6. Class Level: Freshman (< 30 credits) or Sophomore (> 30 credits)
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
FRESHMAN
36
63.2% 26
56.5% 28
57.1% 28
62.2% 38
64.4% 38
65.5% 39
59.1% 32
50.8% 33
52.4% 33
54.1% 31
53.4%
SOPHOMORE
21
36.8% 20
43.5% 21
42.9% 17
37.8% 21
35.6% 20
34.5% 27
40.9% 31
49.2% 30
47.6% 28
45.9% 27
46.6%
Total
57
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
46
49
45
59
58
66
63
63
61
58
Freshman and Sophomore: Percent of Total Enrollment
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
36.8%
43.5%
42.9%
37.8%
35.6%
56.5%
57.1%
62.2%
64.4%
Spring '09
Fall '09
Spring '10
Fall '10
34.5%
40.9%
70.0%
49.2%
47.6%
45.9%
46.6%
50.8%
52.4%
54.1%
53.4%
Spring '12
Fall '12
Spring '13
Fall '13
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
63.2%
65.5%
59.1%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
Fall '08
Spring '11
FRESHMAN
Fall '11
SOPHOMORE
Page 10 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.7. College Admissions Average (CAA): High School GPA of First‐time Freshmen
Students with scores
Fall 08
Spring 09
Fall 09
Spring 10
Fall 10
Spring 11
Fall 11
Spring 12
Fall 12
Spring 13
Fall 13
Students without scores
Avg Score
Median
7
1
7
2
9
2
7
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
73.29
66.10
70.01
79.90
75.01
70.55
72.04
74.1
66.1
70.3
79.9
72.3
70.55
70
11
0
5
1
1
3
77.62
75.6
75.08
75.6
excl. Prelude to Success Freshmen
College Admissions Average (First‐time Freshmen)
80
78
76
74
72
70
68
66
77.62
75.08
75.01
73.29
72.04
70.01
Fall '08
Fall '09
Fall '10
Fall '11
Page 11 of 29
Fall '12
Fall '13
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
A.8. Placement Test Results
Reading Placement Test Result
Fall Cohort
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Total
Exempt
N
0
%
0.0%
N
1
%
10.0%
N
3
%
33.3%
N
0
%
N
0.0% 0
%
N
0.0% 2
%
N
25.0% 6
%
16.7%
Passed
3
33.3%
4
40.0%
3
33.3%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 4
50.0% 14
38.9%
Failed
5
55.6%
4
40.0%
3
33.3%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 1
12.5% 13
36.1%
Not Tested
1
11.1%
1
10.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 1
12.5% 3
8.3%
Total (Tested or Exempt)
8
88.9%
9
90.0%
9
100.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 7
87.5% 33
91.7%
Exempt or Passed Test*
3
37.5%
5
55.6%
6
66.7%
0.0% 0
0.0% 6
85.7% 20
60.6%
0
Writing Placement Test Result
Fall Cohort
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Exempt
0
0.0%
1
10.0%
3
33.3%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 2
25.0% 6
16.7%
Passed
3
33.3%
1
10.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 3
37.5% 7
19.4%
Failed
6
66.7%
8
80.0%
6
66.7%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 2
25.0% 22
61.1%
Not Tested
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 1
12.5% 1
2.8%
Total (Tested or Exempt)
9
100.0% 10
100.0% 9
100.0% 0
0.0% 0
0.0% 7
87.5% 35
97.2%
Exempt or Passed Test*
3
33.3%
20.0%
33.3%
0.0% 0
0.0% 5
71.4% 13
37.1%
3
0
%
N
%
Total
N
2
N
2013
N
%
Math Placement Test Result
Fall Cohort
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
N
%
2013
N
%
Total
N
%
N
%
N
%
N
%
Exempt
1
11.1%
2
20.0%
4
44.4%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 1
12.5% 8
N
22.2%
%
Passed
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 4
50.0% 4
11.1%
Failed
6
66.7%
7
70.0%
4
44.4%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 2
25.0% 19
52.8%
Not Tested
2
22.2%
1
10.0%
1
11.1%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 1
12.5% 5
13.9%
Total (Tested or Exempt)
7
77.8%
9
90.0%
8
88.9%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 7
87.5% 31
86.1%
Exempt or Passed Test*
1
14.3%
2
22.2%
4
50.0%
0
0.0% 0
0.0% 5
71.4% 12
38.7%
*Exempt or passed is a percent of total tested or exempt.
Page 12 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B. Institutional Effectiveness
1
2
3
Remedial vs Non Remedial
Remedial vs Non Remedial Enrollment
Remedial Course Grades Non‐remedial Course Grades 4
5
6
7
8
9
Graduation and Retention Rates
One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Three‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Four‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Cohort)
Degrees Awarded
Transfer Rates and College Destinations
Page 13 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.1 Remedial vs. Non Remedial
Fall 2008
Not in remedial courses
N 43
%
Not in remedial courses
In remedial courses Total
N 75.4% 14
%
N 24.6% 57
35
%
N 42
%
N Not in remedial courses
%
N 28.8% 59
44
N 41
%
N N 23.9% 46
32
%
N Not in remedial courses
%
N 34.9% 63
41
%
N N 65.3% 17
%
Not in remedial courses
N 34.7% 49
31
Not in remedial courses
%
N 24.1% 58
57
%
N N 68.9% 14
%
31.1% 45
Spring 2012
In remedial courses Total
86.4% 9
In remedial courses Total
%
Fall 2011
%
Not in remedial courses
N 13.6% 66
49
In remedial courses Total
%
N 77.8% 14
%
22.2% 63
Fall 2013
Not in remedial courses
In remedial courses Total
67.2% 20
Spring 2010
In remedial courses Total
%
Spring 2013
In remedial courses Total
65.1% 22
%
In remedial courses Total
75.9% 14
Fall 2012
Not in remedial courses
N Spring 2011
In remedial courses Total
71.2% 17
Not in remedial courses
In remedial courses Total
76.1% 11
Fall 2010
Not in remedial courses
Fall 2009
Spring 2009
%
N 32.8% 61
43
In remedial courses Total
%
N 74.1% 15
%
25.9% 58
Percent of Students in Remedial
34.7%
24.6%
23.9%
31.1%
34.9%
28.8%
24.1%
22.2%
32.8%
25.9%
13.6%
Fall '08 Spring '09 Fall '09 Spring '10 Fall '10 Spring '11 Fall '11 Spring '12 Fall '12 Spring '13 Fall '13
Page 14 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.2. Remedial Course Grades Academic Literacy (BE)
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
P
Total
66.7%
8.3%
25.0%
0.0%
12
30.0%
10.0%
50.0%
10.0%
10
61.5%
23.1%
15.4%
0.0%
13
80.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
5
71.4%
0.0%
14.3%
14.3%
7
58.3%
16.7%
16.7%
8.3%
12
0.0%
0.0%
66.7%
33.3%
3
50.0%
0.0%
33.3%
16.7%
6
70.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
10
66.7%
0.0%
33.3%
0.0%
6
33.3%
0.0%
66.7%
0.0%
6
Math
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
P
33.3%
0.0%
55.6%
11.1%
9
25.0%
0.0%
75.0%
0.0%
8
40.0%
0.0%
40.0%
20.0%
10
28.6%
7.1%
42.9%
21.4%
14
23.1%
7.7%
38.5%
30.8%
13
50.0%
0.0%
25.0%
25.0%
12
85.7%
0.0%
14.3%
0.0%
7
20.0%
0.0%
70.0%
10.0%
10
46.7%
0.0%
33.3%
20.0%
15
40.0%
0.0%
60.0%
0.0%
15
37.5%
0.0%
62.5%
0.0%
8
NC
R
WU
NC
R
WU
Total
Page 15 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.3. Non Remedial Course Grades (Grades Towards GPA)
Number of Students
Fall 2008
Grade
Total
A
A‐
B+
B
B‐
C
C+
C‐
D+
D
D‐
F
WU
Total
6,288
3,707
3,296
3,793
2,835
2,088
2,290
1,419
780
1,033
606
1,935
3,174
30,070
EM
34
17
24
19
8
6
10
1
2
4
2
8
19
135
Fall 2009
Total
7,538
4,329
3,840
4,125
3,200
2,438
2,518
1,764
860
1,189
758
2,453
3,175
35,012
EM
22
14
13
11
7
4
9
8
2
6
3
11
10
110
Fall 2010
Total
7,436
4,397
3,786
4,153
3,329
2,353
2,761
1,675
860
1,225
685
2,524
3,176
35,184
Fall 2011
EM
41
30
15
22
9
13
8
8
4
3
3
8
18
164
Total
8,445
4,839
4,070
4,414
3,528
2,570
2,910
1,973
1,035
1,335
670
3,071
3,177
38,860
EM
39
30
16
15
14
15
12
5
2
5
4
17
14
174
Fall 2012
Total
8,600
5,040
4,105
4,379
3,523
2,506
2,980
1,847
880
1,212
685
3,077
3,178
38,834
EM
36
21
13
19
15
9
7
4
3
4
6
17
20
154
Fall 2013
Total
8,682
5,096
4,243
4,513
3,606
2,640
3,044
1,848
912
1,279
763
3,020
3,179
39,646
EM
56
20
19
15
9
9
7
9
3
3
2
7
9
159
Percentage of Students
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
Grade
Total
EM
Total
EM
Total
EM
Total
EM
Total
EM
Total
EM
A
A‐
B+
B
B‐
C+
C
C‐
D+
D
D‐
F
WU
Total
20.9%
12.3%
11.0%
12.6%
9.4%
6.9%
7.6%
4.7%
2.6%
3.4%
2.0%
6.4%
10.6%
100.0%
25.2%
12.6%
17.8%
14.1%
5.9%
4.4%
7.4%
0.7%
1.5%
3.0%
1.5%
5.9%
14.1%
100.0%
21.5%
12.4%
11.0%
11.8%
9.1%
7.0%
7.2%
5.0%
2.5%
3.4%
2.2%
7.0%
9.1%
100.0%
20.0%
12.7%
11.8%
10.0%
6.4%
3.6%
8.2%
7.3%
1.8%
5.5%
2.7%
10.0%
9.1%
100.0%
21.1%
12.5%
10.8%
11.8%
9.5%
6.7%
7.8%
4.8%
2.4%
3.5%
1.9%
7.2%
9.0%
100.0%
25.0%
18.3%
9.1%
13.4%
5.5%
7.9%
4.9%
4.9%
2.4%
1.8%
1.8%
4.9%
11.0%
100.0%
21.7%
12.5%
10.5%
11.4%
9.1%
6.6%
7.5%
5.1%
2.7%
3.4%
1.7%
7.9%
8.2%
100.0%
22.4%
17.2%
9.2%
8.6%
8.0%
8.6%
6.9%
2.9%
1.1%
2.9%
2.3%
9.8%
8.0%
100.0%
22.1%
13.0%
10.6%
11.3%
9.1%
6.5%
7.7%
4.8%
2.3%
3.1%
1.8%
7.9%
8.2%
100.0%
23.4%
13.6%
8.4%
12.3%
9.7%
5.8%
4.5%
2.6%
1.9%
2.6%
3.9%
11.0%
13.0%
100.0%
21.9%
12.9%
10.7%
11.4%
9.1%
6.7%
7.7%
4.7%
2.3%
3.2%
1.9%
7.6%
8.0%
100.0%
35.2%
12.6%
11.9%
9.4%
5.7%
5.7%
4.4%
5.7%
1.9%
1.9%
1.3%
4.4%
5.7%
100.0%
Page 16 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.4. One‐Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
EM‐A.A.S.
Total
Fall Cohort
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
N
8
8
9
6
12
QCC‐Wide
Still Enrolled for Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued at Degree Pursued at QCC
QCC
N
%
%
6
75.0%
70.6%
7
87.5%
71.4%
7
77.8%
72.1%
3
50.0%
69.2%
7
58.3%
70.9%
One Year Retention Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
100.0%
90.0%
80.0%
70.0%
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
87.5%
70.6%
75.0%
71.4%
72.1%
77.8%
70.9%
69.2%
58.3%
50.0%
Fall 08
Fall 09
Fall10
QCC‐wide
Fall 11
Fall 12
EM
Page 17 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.5. Three‐Year Retention and Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
EM‐A.A.S.
Total
Fall Cohort
N
2003
13
2004
14
2005
12
2006
7
2007
9
2008
8
2009
8
2010
9
2
2
2
1
1
1
4
Earned Degree Pursued
N
%
15.4%
14.3%
16.7%
14.3%
11.1%
‐‐
‐‐
12.5%
44.4%
N
3
5
3
2
1
2
1
QCC‐wide
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued
%
23.1%
35.7%
25.0%
‐‐
‐‐
22.2%
12.5%
25.0%
11.1%
Earned Degree Pursued
%
15.0%
12.8%
13.0%
12.8%
15.8%
13.8%
16.2%
18.5%
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued
%
20.9%
21.5%
22.7%
21.4%
21.6%
23.3%
21.5%
22.2%
Three‐Year Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Freshmen Cohort)
50.0%
45.0%
40.0%
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
44.4%
15.0% 15.4%
12.8% 14.3%
13.0%
16.7%
12.8% 14.3%
15.8%
11.1%
16.2%
13.8%
18.5%
12.5%
0.0%
2003
2004
2005
2006
QCC‐Wide Earned Degree
2007
2008
2009
2010
EM‐A.A.S. Earned Degree
Page 18 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.6. Four‐Year Retention and Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
EM‐A.A.S.
Fall Cohort
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Total
N
13
14
12
7
9
8
8
3
3
2
1
2
1
1
Earned Degree Pursued
N
%
23.1%
21.4%
16.7%
14.3%
22.2%
12.5%
12.5%
N
1
1
2
1
1
2
QCC‐wide
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued
%
7.7%
7.1%
16.7%
‐‐
‐‐
11.1%
12.5%
25.0%
Earned Degree Pursued
%
20.8%
20.0%
18.4%
19.0%
22.6%
20.7%
23.5%
Still Enrolled for Degree Pursued
%
10.0%
9.7%
13.2%
10.5%
11.8%
11.5%
10.5%
Four‐Year Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Freshmen Cohort)
30.0%
25.0%
20.8%
22.6%
23.1%
20.0%
22.2%
21.4%
20.0%
18.4%
16.7%
19.0%
15.0%
14.3%
23.5%
20.7%
12.5%
12.5%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
2003
2004
2005
2006
QCC‐wide
2007
2008
2009
EM‐A.A.S.
Page 19 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.7. Six‐Year Retention & Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Fall Freshmen Cohort)
Fall Cohort
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Total
N
13
14
12
7
9
3
4
3
1
3
EM‐A.A.S.
Earned Degree Still Enrolled for Pursued
Degree Pursued
N
%
N
%
23.1%
1
7.7%
28.6%
1
7.1%
25.0%
2
16.7%
14.3%
‐‐
‐‐
33.3%
‐‐
‐‐
QCC‐wide
Earned Degree Pursued
%
25.1%
24.0%
25.2%
25.3%
28.7%
Six‐Year Graduation Rates (First‐time Full‐time Freshmen)
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
33.3%
25.1% 23.1%
28.6%
24.0%
25.2% 25.0%
20.0%
28.7%
25.3%
14.3%
10.0%
0.0%
2003
2004
QCC‐Wide Earned Degree
2005
2006
2007
EM‐A.A.S. Earned Degree
Page 20 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.8. Degrees Awarded
Graduation Year¹ Degree
EM
A.A.S.
2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011 2011‐2012 2012‐2013
4
6
8
8
13
14
¹ Graduation year include summer, fall, and spring graduations. (E.g. 07/08 includes summer 2007, fall 2007, and spring 2008 graduations).
Degrees Awarded Trend Analysis
EM
Degree
07/08
A.A.S.
4
12/13
14
Growth %
11/12
250.0%
13
Page 21 of 29
12/13
14
Growth %
7.7%
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
B.9. Transfer Rates¹ and College Destinations
2008‐2009
2009‐2010
2010‐2011
2011‐2012
2012‐2013
Total Graduates
6
8
8
13
14
EM‐A.A.S. Graduates
% Outside % CUNY CUNY Senior Senior College College Transfers
Transfers
33.3%
0.0%
37.5%
25.0%
50.0%
12.5%
30.8%
23.1%
57.1%
0.0%
Total Senior College Transfer Rate
33.3%
62.5%
62.5%
53.8%
57.1%
Total Transfer Rates of EM‐A.A.S. Graduates by Graduation Year
62.5%
62.5%
2009‐2010
2010‐2011
53.8%
57.1%
2011‐2012
2012‐2013
33.3%
2008‐2009
2013‐2014 CUNY College Destinations of 2012‐2013 EM‐A.A.S. Graduates¹
Number of CUNY Colleges
Graduates
City
Baruch
Hunter
Lehman
Brooklyn
Queens
Staten Island
NYC Tech
York
John Jay
1
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
‐‐
6
‐‐
‐‐
1
‐‐
¹ Graduates were counted as transferred if they were registered in any of the CUNY senior colleges (including the Graduate Center, the Law School, the School of Professional Studies, and the School of Journalism) in any or all semesters of the academic year following the graduation year.
Page 22 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
C. Courses and Curriculum
Courses by Supporting Departments: Historical Trends 2008‐2013
1 Required Courses ‐‐ Average Grades: Fall
Grade Point Average
2 First Semester GPA
3 First Year GPA
4 Graduation GPA
Page 23 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
C.1. Internet Technology Courses A minimum of 5 students is required to report averages
EM Courses ‐‐ Average Grades
Dept
Arts
Arts
EN
EN
ET
ET
ET
ET
ET
MA
Course #
121
291
102
103
504
704
710
712
718
301
Course Name
Two Dimensional Design
Electronic Imaging
English Composition II
Writing for New Media
Operating Systems and System Deployment
Network Fundamentals I
Web Technology I
Web Client Programming
Database Technology
Foundations of Mathematics
Total
# Less than 5 students enrolled that semester
Required Courses ‐‐ Average Grades
Fall 08 Spring 09 Fall 09 Spring 10 Fall 10 Spring 11 Fall 11 Spring 12 Fall 12 Spring13 Fall 13 Mean GPA
3.51
2.72
2.46
2.34
2.93
2.46
2.98
3.40
3.67
#
2.91
3.53
3.65
1.63
2.50
2.01
2.00
1.00
2.14
‐‐
2.75
2.38
2.27
#
2.66
#
2.18
#
3.18
2.08
2.68
#
2.63
3.27
3.34
#
#
2.98
2.85
3.37
2.52
‐‐
#
2.89
Page 24 of 29
3.01
2.85
2.48
1.88
2.78
3.01
2.77
3.08
3.01
2.06
2.70
2.27
2.71
2.43
2.62
3.45
2.73
2.96
2.01
‐‐
2.52
2.62
3.14
#
2.57
#
2.40
2.69
2.51
2.90
‐‐
2.25
2.68
2.63
2.71
1.95
#
2.34
2.20
2.75
2.64
‐‐
1.93
2.37
2.60
3.01
1.84
1.72
2.39
2.12
2.68
2.95
‐‐
2.14
2.44
2.83
2.71
2.66
3.30
3.53
2.34
3.04
3.20
‐‐
1.71
2.81
2.94
#
#
#
3.14
2.75
3.00
3.22
3.44
2.89
2.98
2.90
2.93
2.18
2.32
2.70
2.50
2.82
2.78
3.22
2.15
2.67
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
C.2. First‐Semester GPA
Entering Fall:
Average
Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013
2.59
2.04
2.74
2.05
2.52
2.96
25th Percentile
Median
75th Percentile
1.94
1.33
1.80
0.86
2.00
2.80
2.85
1.73
3.09
2.00
2.47
3.19
3.53
3.30
3.82
3.00
3.77
3.74
Maximum
Minimum
3.91
3.68
4.00
3.84
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
14
11
11
11
14
10
Student Count
First Semester GPA 3.50
3.00
2.50
2.96
2.74
2.59
2.52
2.05
2.04
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Page 25 of 29
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
C.3. First‐Year GPA (Attended at Least Two Semesters, Freshmen and Transfers)
Entering Fall:
Average
Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012
2.36
2.47
2.67
1.77
2.92
25th Percentile
Median
75th Percentile
1.04
1.75
2.16
0.38
2.55
2.71
2.70
2.89
1.30
3.07
3.56
3.43
3.85
3.60
3.67
Maximum
Minimum
3.92
3.87
4.00
3.70
4.00
0.67
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.63
10
11
11
10
12
Student Count
First Year GPA 3.50
3.00
2.50
2.36
2.47
2.92
2.67
1.77
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Fall 2008
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Page 26 of 29
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
C.4. Graduation GPA
Graduation Year
Average
2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011 2011‐2012 2012‐2013
2.84
3.08
3.05
3.00
3.00
25th Percentile
Median
75th Percentile
2.52
2.60
2.75
2.52
2.70
2.74
3.13
2.95
3.09
2.97
3.03
3.43
3.49
3.35
3.30
Maximum
Minimum
3.73
3.93
3.68
3.78
3.74
2.51
2.48
2.57
2.24
2.42
Total Graduates
6
8
8
13
14
Graduation GPA
3.15
3.10
3.05
3.00
2.95
2.90
2.85
2.80
2.75
2.70
3.05
3.08
3.00
3.00
2.84
2008‐2009
2009‐2010
2010‐2011
Page 27 of 29
2011‐2012
2012‐2013
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
D. Faculty and Staff
Faculty Members:
2
List of Faculty members
Page 28 of 29
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment
Internet Technology (EM‐A.A.S.)
Program Review Data Packet
D.2. Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology Faculty
As of Fall 2013
Sorted by alphabetical order of last name within time status
Last Name
Asser
Birchfield
Brumgnach
Buoncora
Chao
Davis
Dizinno
Drini
Gayle
Goldenberg
Kueper
Mangra
Metaxas
Namdar
Park
Schwartz
Stark
Stigliano
Weber
Yuster
Banho
Bassali
Dada
Ducroiset
Emanuel
Goldblatt
Heinz
Kozma
Kupfer
Laifer
Leccese
Lu
Mazzella
Nashelsky
Novak
Nystrom
Paolino
Sun
Szabo
Toyota
Wu
First Name
Stuart
Belle
Edward
John
Nathan
Edward
Nicholas
Merlinda
Marvin
Joseph
Robert
Danny
Mike
Hamid
Kee
Jeffrey
Peter
Vincent
Craig
Richard
Brian
Fred
Azeem
John
Pericles
Michael
Walter
Michael
Samuel
Ephraim
John
Lin
Robert
Louis
Peter
Vaughn
Peter
Joann
Andrei
Brian
Huixin
Department Name
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Engineering Technology
Page 29 of 29
Faculty Type
Professor
Professor
Professor
Lecturer
Professor
Asst Professor
Asst Professor
Asst Professor
Assc Professor
Assc Professor
Asst Professor
Asst Professor
Asst Professor
Assc Professor
Asst Professor
Asst Professor
Professor
Assc Professor
Assc Professor
Professor
Adj Lecturer
Adj Asst Professor
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Professor
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Assc Professor
Adj Lecturer
Adj Asst Professor
Adj Lecturer
Adj Professor
Adj Asst Professor
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Adj Lecturer
Time Status
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Full‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Part‐time Faculty
Office of Institutional Research and Assessment