CSR and the management of scandals, image disasters, reputation from the unethical behavior. Patrizia Gazzola Department of Economics Insubria University – Varese – Italy patrizia.gazzola@uninsubria.it CREARES CENTRE FOR RESEARCH ON BUSINESS ETHICS AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Italy the boot shaped country The region 3 The area of lakes 4 Varese Villa Toeplitz Conference and seminars, Insubria University From the past to the present “Someone is sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time” (Warren Buffet) From east to west from north to south Does the flap of a butterfly's wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? (Lorenz, 1972) The convergence in the organizations of multiple interests The institutional goals of organizations derive from the ultimate purpose of the participation in the development of people forming the organization community 1. Satisfaction of economic (salaries, etc.) and non-economic (conditions of individual development) needs of the workers involved in the development of the organizations; 2. Meeting the expectations, especially economic, of the shareholders. 3. Active participation in the economic and social development of the country or countries in which the organization operates. Stakeholder map Internal/external stakeholder Near and far stakeholder Direct and indirect stakeholder Stakeholders in Westchester Probation Service Potential stakeholder: University of Greenwich The crise for an organization a situation that causes negative or undesirable outcomes for an organization an event that ―suddenly occurs, demands quick reaction, interferes with organizational performance, creates uncertainty and stress, threatens the reputation, assets of the organization, escalates in intensity, causes outsiders to scrutinize the organization, and permanently alters the organization How to manage the crise? crisis management is a critical function for an organization, because failure in managing a crisis can result in serious harm to the stakeholders, losses for an organization, or end its very existence. What is the corporate reputation? Corporate reputation defined as "overall estimation in which a company is held by its constituents. A corporate reputation represents the net affective or emotional reaction - good bad, weak or strong - of customers, investors, employees and general public to the company's name". (Fombrun, C. J.1996, p.9) Why companies has to manage the reputation? “It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently” (Warren Buffet) The more unfavourable the reputation, the stronger its influence on stakeholders’ assessment. People react more strongly to negative than to positive information. Some also find asymmetry in trust – unfavourable events decrease trust far more than favourable events increase. Even judgements about objects with good and bad characteristics are more heavily influenced by negative data. The role of social network Few years ago it was difficult to receive information about the social and environmental situation. Now the informations are very fast thanks to the social network like: Facebook, Twiter, ecc. In 24 hours a news can go all the word Nestlé: the exchange of Strategy Nestlé In March 2010, the environmental organization Greenpeace has denounced Nestlé for using palm oil used for the production of snacks. After the complaint appeared on Facebook and Twitter several protest groups who supported the Greenpeace campaign against Nestle. They try to remove a video from Youtube, but the visiteur became in few hors 180.000 They decide to transform the risk in opportunity Nestlé The strategy followed by Nestlé was to not try to control social media conversations but adjust their approach. First, to deal with the damage of short, Nestlé has suspended supplies of palm oil from the Indonesian company and requested a meeting with Greenpeace in which he presented the details of its new supply chain of palm oil. Nestlé has also joined the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, Nestlé had set up a “digital acceleration team” as part of Nestlé’s efforts to monitor social media sentiment 24 hours a day. When the team sees problems, the communications unit co-ordinates the company’s engagement with the relevant parties, such as suppliers, campaigners, governments and consumers. The Moncler scandal A television programme accused Moncler down jacket makers of using inhumane methods to pluck geese, sending shares in the Italian luxury outerwear brand down as much as 6 percent. Reputation Manager, an Italian firm that measures brands' online standing, said the show, called Report, had triggered 4,300 tweets on Moncler between Sunday night and Monday morning, 88 percent of which were negative The Moncler strategy Moncler has met the NGO for animals and ask help to monitor more closely the supplier. In the code of ethics there was no reference to animal protection. In the code of ethics was added a point in paragraph number 6, just what the "respect for the principles concerning the protection of the environment and the animals." Coca cola A report issued by the Indian NGO Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) in 2003 provided evidence of the presence of pesticides, to a level exceeding European standards,25 in a sample of a dozen Coca-Cola and PepsiCo beverages sold in India. The report gained ample public and media attention, resulting in almost immediate effects on Coca-Cola revenues. The strategy Two years before the water conflict in India in 2003, CocaCola adopted the GRI Guidelines and started reporting on sustainability. By 2003, the company had already experienced a few CSRrelated conflicts in other parts of the world. Coca-Cola gradually changed its strategy to include damagecontrol measures that addressed the Indian communities’ grievances. In 2008 the company published its first environmental performance report on operations in India, which covered activities from 2004 to 2007. It also created the Coca-Cola India Foundation, Anandana, which works with local communities and NGOs to address local water problems. Walmart At the end of 2005, the Radio Canada programme Zone Libre made public the news that Walmart was using child labour at two factories in Bangladesh.89 Children aged 10-14 years old were found to be working in the factories for less than $50 a month making products of the Walmart brand for export to Canada. The strategy Walmart developed its first Code of Conduct (COC) ‘Standard for Suppliers’ in 1992,95 which mainly focuses on quality standards for suppliers only. However, Walmart’s first general report (‘Report on Ethical Sourcing’96), which includes suppliers, customers and associates, was generated in 2006. This report was elaborated after the filing of the lawsuit by the female employees in 2001 and the damaging campaigns and press publications accusing Walmart’s suppliers in Bangladesh of using child labour. Walmart’s reporting culture was imitated by the rest of the companies in the market. Nowadays, Walmart has been qualified as a ‘global legislator’ in CSR policies. The “Fraud Triangle” Opportunities Ability to execute plan without being caught Weak Board of Directors Weak Internal Controls Incentives/Pressures Motivation or incentives to commit fraud Tight Debt Covenants Unrealistic Analyst Expectations Attitudes/Rationalizations Justificaton of dishonest actions Lack of a Code of Conduct Disregard for Financial Reporting Information to Assess Fraud Risks Brainstorming Inquiries Analytical Procedures Fraud Risk Factors Identified Fraud Risks Other Information 7 dimentions of the reputation The link between reputation and CSR Top ten Italian companies for CSR reputation, 3 years Top ten Italian companies for CSR reputation 2014 Global reputation brand 2015 The italian companies in the top 100 Ferrero 20° Giorgio Armani 37° Pirelli 38° Barilla 46° Lavazza 68° Standard Ethics Italian Index Brunello Cucinelli: the humanistic enterprise Cucinelli is an enterprise in which the orientation to CSR is part of the genetic heritage of the company from the beginning for the presence of a strongly leadership sensitive to social and environmental issues The ethical, humanist-inspired entrepreneurial model places people at the center of the production process. It encourages the creativity of each worker and simultaneously develops within them a sense of profound participation in the group's success and goals CSR impacts Generally companies start to engage in CSR activities in order to respond to a demand of the external stakeholders. They also consider the positive effects of CSR on reputation. Sometimes they start to engage in CSR to react to a scandal. The role of CSR the rule of CSR in the growing interdependence between business and environment in times of uncertainty. the stakeholder engagement can give the plasticity to the organization and the dynamic capability approach can create the relationship of trust. They are the basis for face the uncertainty and transform it in opportunity. Dynamic capabilities dynamic capabilities (Teece et al. 1997): the deeper institutional ability to innovate, adapt, and compete in a networked world of constant change and of complex business "ecosystems.” dynamic capability approach emphasizes two aspects. it refers to shifting character of environment. it emphasizes the key strategic management in appropriately adapting, integrating and reconfiguring internal and external organizational skills, resources, and functional competencies toward changing environment CSR and strategy The fundamental problem with CSR practice is that companies usually don’t have a CSR strategy, but rather numerous disparate CSR programs and initiatives. A growing number of companies develop their CSR in response to a variety of social, environmental and economical pressures. By planning out CSR as part of a corporate strategy, organizations can ensure that profits and increasing shareholder value don’t overshadow the need to behave ethically to their stakeholders 5 stages of development of the CSR in the strategy The model of business strategy The model of business strategy and the dynamic capability Conclusion Unethical behaviour can be very costly! HANKS FOR T YOUR ATTENTION!