Utility Infrastructure Financing Bryan A. Mantz, CMC, CGFM Public Resources Management Group, Inc. Utility, Rate, Financial and Management Consultants FGFOA School of Government Finance - November 2015 AGENDA Major Issues Affecting Florida Utilities Establishing a Solid Business Foundation Based on Best Management Practices Developing a Realistic Financial Plan Grant Funding Options Debt Financing Options Some Final Thoughts Questions and Discussion 2 The Utility Is Usually a Local Government’s Largest “Business” Provides Essential Service on a Continual Basis • Linked to Public Health and Safety Major Objective of Utility Business: Customer Satisfaction • Consider Long-Term Interests of Customers from Operational, Service, and Financial Perspective Typically Accounted For in Enterprise Fund • Used for Business-Type Activities Where Government Sells Goods or Services to General Public • Usually Funded Primarily Through User Charges 3 Utilities Are Highly-Regulated By Outside Agencies Regulatory Agencies for Florida Utilities: Environmental Protection Agency Florida Department of Environmental Protection Water Management Districts Department of Health Private Utilities: Florida Public Service Commission Consent Orders or Fines for Regulatory NonCompliance or Pollution Consent Orders Can Negatively Affect Credit Rating Florida Statute 401.121: FDEP Can Fine Up to $10,000 Per Day for Major Violations 4 Major Issues Affecting Many Florida Utilities Substantial Renewal / Replacement Needs • 50+ Year-Old Infrastructure • Often “Out of Sight, Out of Mind” • Costs to Replace Are Much Greater Than Original Cost Capital Costs Continue to Increase • Engineering News-Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index Increases: 1-Year = 2.1% 5-Year = 2.5% Per Year 10-Year = 3.1% Per Year 5 The Water and Wastewater Utility Industry Is One of the Most Capital-Intensive Industries! Substantial Capital Investment Required Per Dollar of Revenue Historically Under-Funded American Society of Civil Engineers 2013 Report Card on America’s Infrastructure: Grade of D (Poor) for Both Drinking Water and Wastewater Systems Drinking Water Systems in Florida: Grade of C (Mediocre) • Projected $16.4 Billion Needed to Maintain and Upgrade Systems Over Next 20 Years Both Wastewater Systems and Stormwater Systems in Florida: Grade of C (Mediocre) • Projected $19.6 Billion Needed to Maintain and Upgrade Wastewater Systems Over Next 20 Years “If the nation fails to meet the investment needs of the next 20 years, it risks reversing public health, environmental, and economic gains of the 6 past three decades.” – ASCE Major Issues Affecting Many Florida Utilities (cont.) Alternative Water Supply • Limits on Withdrawals from Current Freshwater Source of Water Supply – Existing Capacity May Need to Be Replaced • Need to Invest in Additional (More Expensive) Treatment Facilities – Treatment Plants Withdrawing from Floridan Aquifer (Brackish Water) – Expansion of Reclaimed Water Facilities • Portion of Potable Water Irrigation Required to Be Replaced with Reclaimed Water Elimination of Ocean Outfalls • May Require: ─ Reclaimed Water System Expansion ─ Deep Injection Well Construction 7 To Help Keep User Rates Reasonable and Affordable , and to Enable Utility to Look Its Best When Debt Financing, We Should Ensure That We Have… Solid Utility Business Foundation Based on Best Management Practices Realistic Financial Plan 8 Establishing a Solid Utility Business Foundation Based on Best Management Practices 9 Utility Best Management and Financial Practices Discussed in Publications from Rating Agencies Moody’s • “Rating Methodology for U.S. Municipal Utility Revenue Debt” • “Moody’s on Revenue Bonds: The Fundamentals of Revenue Bond Credit Analysis” Standard and Poor’s • “Public Finance Criteria Book” • “U.S. Public Finance: Key Water and Sewer Utility Credit Ratio Ranges” Fitch Ratings • “Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Rating Guidelines” • “Rating Criteria for Infrastructure and Project Finance” Conforming With Utility Best Management Practices Can Lead to Lower Rates Over the Long-Term Higher Credit Ratings and Lower Interest Rates When Debt Financing 10 How Do Rating Agencies Evaluate Your Utility Business? Water and Wastewater Revenue Bond Rating Considerations Utility Managers Can Control or Influence Many of These Factors FITCH 10 C’s of Water / Sewer Revenue Bond Analysis [*] MOODY'S Key Rating Factors STANDARD & POOR'S Key Rating Factors Crew (Management) Governance and Management Quality Management Community Characteristics Regulatory Risk Economic Considerations Customer Growth and Concentration Construction Risk Financial Data/Capital Improvement Plan Capacity System Size and Assessment Base Rate Criteria Compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations Local Economy and Customer Base Operational Characteristics Capital Demands and Debt Policies Strategic Focus Legal Provisions Covenants System Demand and Capacity Charges and Rate Affordability Maintenance of Assets Coverage and Financial Regulatory Compliance Cash and Balance Sheet Considerations Rates, Rate Structures and Ratemaking Flexibility Liquidity [*] Subset of 4 general areas of revenue-supported rating criteria: governance and management, financial 11 profile and operating profile. A Utility’s Credit Rating Is a Reflection of Utility Management (*) Assessment of Financial Risk Utility Best Management Practices Help to Reduce Implied Financial Risk What Are the Management Practices of Highly-Rated Utilities? (*) Utility Management Includes Governing Body 12 Highly-Rated Utilities… Exhibit Practices That Maximize Stability By Planning ─ The More Written and Adopted Policies, Procedures and Plans, the Better! (Rating Agencies Will Request Copies) Anticipate Future Regulatory and Growth Demands Reliably Implement Steady Rate Increases Over Time Have Liquidity to Meet Unexpected Sales Shortfalls / Emergencies It’s Never Too Late to Improve the Utility Business Foundation! 13 Establishing the Utility Business Foundation Establish Business Principles • Serve as Basis for Long-Term Decision Making • Examples: - Maintain Financial Creditworthiness - Rates Affordable and Recover Full Cost of Service - Comply With Regulations - Uninterrupted Service - Customer Satisfaction Adopt Long-Term Business Plan • Expansion Plans • Sustainability Plans • Updated Every Few Years Adopt Formal Debt Management Policy 14 Establishing the Utility Business Foundation (cont.) Adopt Financial Policies and Performance Measures • Debt Service Coverage - Should Exceed Minimum Required (e.g., 150% “All-In” Coverage) • Cash Reserve Policy - Working Capital (e.g., 120 Days of Operating Revenue) - Capital Replacement Deposits Based on Asset Management Plan or % of Revenues - Rating Agencies: Utility With Stronger Financial Profile Might Have Days Cash on Hand Equal to One Year or More Days Cash on Hand = Unrestricted cash and investments divided by operating expenditures minus depreciation, divided by 365 15 Establishing the Utility Business Foundation (cont.) Adopt Financial Policies and Performance Measures (cont.) • Cash Reserve Policy (cont.) - Could Establish Reserves for: Rate Stabilization Anticipated Changes in Regulations Alternative Water Resource Funding Emergencies / Catastrophic Events • Benchmarking - Medians By Rating, Location, Etc. Published By Rating Agencies 16 Some Key Financial Ratios Used By Credit Rating Agencies When Evaluating Utilities All-In Debt Service Coverage • Definition: Revenues Available for Debt Service Divided By Total Debt Service (Senior Plus Subordinate Lien) • Measures Financial Margin to Meet Debt Obligations • Fitch 2015 Water and Sewer Medians All-In Debt Service Coverage: Without Impact Fees With Impact Fees Net of Transfers Out Minimum Projected 3-Year Historical Average AAA-Rated AA-Rated A-Rated All Credits 2.6 2.8 2.5 2.3 2.8 1.8 2.0 1.8 1.6 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.0 1.6 2.1 17 Some Key Financial Ratios Used By Credit Rating Agencies When Evaluating Utilities (cont.) Senior Lien Debt Service Coverage • Definition: Revenues Available for Debt Service Divided By Senior Lien Debt Service • Measures Financial Margin to Meet Senior Lien Debt Obligations • Fitch 2015 Water and Sewer Medians Senior Lien Debt Service Coverage: Without Impact Fees With Impact Fees Net of Transfers Out Minimum Projected 3-Year Historical Average AAA-Rated AA-Rated A-Rated All Credits 4.0 4.4 3.7 3.6 4.3 2.3 2.5 2.2 1.9 2.5 2.1 2.4 2.3 1.5 2.0 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.0 2.6 18 Some Key Financial Ratios Used By Credit Rating Agencies When Evaluating Utilities (cont.) Days Cash on Hand • Definition: Unrestricted Cash and Investments Divided By Operating Expenditures Minus Depreciation, Divided By 365 • Measures Financial Flexibility to Pay Near-Term Financial Obligations - Utilities With Stronger Financial Profiles: Days Cash on Hand Equal to One Year or More • Fitch 2015 Water and Sewer Medians Days Cash on Hand AAA-Rated 481 AA-Rated 442 A-Rated 366 All Credits 432 19 Some Key Financial Ratios Used By Credit Rating Agencies When Evaluating Utilities (cont.) Outstanding Long-Term Debt Per Customer Outstanding Long-Term Debt Per Capita • Definition: Principal Amount of Debt Outstanding Divided By Number of Customers; Principal Amount of Debt Outstanding Divided By Number of Persons in Service Area • Measures Debt Burden for Ratepayers • Fitch 2015 Water and Sewer Medians Long-Term Debt Per Customer: Current Projected Year 5 Long-Term Debt Per Capita: Current Projected Year 5 AAA-Rated AA-Rated A-Rated All Credits $1,259 1,341 $1,934 2,049 $2,218 2,423 $1,836 1,997 $349 323 $521 520 $473 741 $491 522 20 Some Key Financial Ratios Used By Credit Rating Agencies When Evaluating Utilities (cont.) Free Cash as Percent of Depreciation • Definition: Current Surplus Revenues After Payment of Operating Expenses, Debt Service, and Operating Transfers Out Divided By Current Year Depreciation • Measures Annual Financial Capacity to Maintain Existing Infrastructure at Current Level of Service from Existing Cash Flows - Utilities With Stronger Financial Profiles: Free Cash as Percent of Depreciation ≥ 100% • Fitch 2015 Water and Sewer Medians Free Cash as Percent of Depreciation AAA-Rated 117% AA-Rated 94% A-Rated 126% All Credits 102% 21 Establishing the Utility Business Foundation (cont.) Utility Rates Consider Revenue Stability • Most Utility Costs Are Fixed • Rating Agencies Prefer Greater Than 30% Cost Recovery Through Base Charges • HOWEVER, Raising Base Charges Does Not Encourage Water Conservation ─ Supported By Studies Sponsored By Water Management Districts ─ Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC), When Evaluating Rate Applications From Private Utilities, Does Not Usually Approve User Rates Under Which the Base Charges Recover More Than 40% of System Costs • In Florida, Water Management Districts Typically Require Conservation Rate Structure Before Issuing Consumptive Use Permits 22 Establishing the Utility Business Foundation (cont.) Utility Rates (cont.) Consider Affordability (Hot Topic in Utility Industry) • Rating Agencies: Affordable = Monthly Utility Bill for Combined Water and Wastewater Service Not Higher Than 2% of Median Household Income of Service Area ─ 1% If Only One Service (Water or Wastewater) • Median Household Income Metric Has Been Challenged as Underestimating Effects of Rising Utility Bills on LowIncome, Fixed-Income and Renter-Occupied Households 23 Establishing the Utility Business Foundation (cont.) Other Financial Considerations Best Management Practice Per Rating Agencies: Limit Nonutility-Related Transfers to General Fund • Utility Industry Is One of Most Capital-Intensive Industries ─ Substantial Amount of Capital (Often Secured Through Debt Financing) Is Required to Provide Service ─ Should Reinvest in System Minimize Dependence on Fees Charged to New Growth to Pay Debt Address Liabilities Associated With Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB) 24 Developing a Realistic Financial Plan 25 Developing a Realistic Plan Establish Criteria to Prioritize Capital Program Sample Criteria in Order of Priority: • Public Health and Safety ─ Project Addresses Working and Public Health / Safety Issues • Regulatory Compliance ─ Project Promotes Regulatory and Contractual Compliance • System Reliability ─ Project Reduces Risk and Consequences of Asset Failure and Addresses Other Attributes of Asset Management (Redundancy) • Community / Customer Benefit ─ Project Addresses Service Issues Such as Pressure, Taste / Odor and Customer Satisfaction • Sustainability ─ Project Will Result in Long-Term Cost Efficiencies and Has Environmental “Green” Benefits 26 Developing a Realistic Plan (cont.) Is the Utility’s Capital Program: • Necessary? • Reasonable? - Consider Capacity Utilization; Unused Capacity Is Most Expensive Capacity • Attainable? - IRS Arbitrage Rules: All Bond Proceeds Must Be Spent Within 3 Years - Historical Capital Spending Levels (Especially for R&R Projects) Often a Good Indicator of How Much Capital Program Can Actually Be Executed • Fundable? 27 Developing a Realistic Plan (cont.) Typical Capital Program Funding Sources: • Issuance of Debt • Revenues -Charges for Service / Rates -Reserves • Capacity / Impact Fees, Assessments, and Other Charges Collected from Growth • Contributed Capital (e.g., Grants, Legislative Budget Appropriation), Facilities, and Property 28 Grant Funding Options for Utility 29 Grant Opportunities in Florida – Small or Economically-Disadvantaged Communities Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Small Community Wastewater Facilities Grant PURPOSE: Planning, Designing, and Constructing Wastewater Collection, Transmission, Treatment, or Disposal Facilities WHO CAN APPLY: Incorporated Municipality, Total Population ≤ 10,000, Per Capita Income < State Average CONSIDERATIONS: Highest Priority to Projects Addressing Most Serious Risks to Public Health, Are Necessary to Achieve Compliance, or Assist Systems Most in Need Based on Affordability Index 30 Grant Opportunities in Florida – Small or Economically-Disadvantaged Communities (cont.) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Water and Waste Disposal Grants PURPOSE: Water and Wastewater Infrastructure WHO CAN APPLY: Rural Areas and Municipalities With Total Population ≤ 10,000 31 Grant Opportunities in Florida – Small or Economically-Disadvantaged Communities (cont.) Florida Department of Economic Opportunity Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program PURPOSE: Housing and Community Development Activities, Including Water and Wastewater Improvements, That: – Provide Benefit to Low- and Moderate-Income Persons – Eliminate Slum and Blight; or – Address an Urgent Need (Serious or Immediate Threat to Local Population) WHO CAN APPLY: Cities That Have Not Accepted Special Entitlement Status or Have Opted Out of Urban Entitlement Program Counties With < 200,000 Residents 32 Grant Opportunities in Florida – All Communities Water Management Districts Cooperative Funding Program (Up to 50% of Cost) PURPOSE: Projects Related to Water Supply, Alternative Water Supply (Including Reclaimed Water), Water Conservation, Water Quality (e.g., Septic Tank Removal), Stormwater / Flood Protection WHO CAN APPLY: Local Governments or Nonprofit Utilities in Applicable Jurisdiction 33 Grant Opportunities in Florida – All Communities Environmental Protection Agency 319(h) Clean Water Act Federally-Funded Grant 40% Match Requirement Can Take Up to 2 Years to Receive Funds PURPOSE: Nonpoint Source Pollution Abatement WHO CAN APPLY: State Agencies, Local Governments, Colleges / Universities, Nonprofits, Public Utilities, State Water Management Districts Contact FDEP for More Information 34 Grant Opportunities in Florida – All Communities Environmental Protection Agency Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Grant Match Amount Must Be > Grant Amount 25% of Match Must Be from Local Government PURPOSE: Reduce Pollutant Loadings from Urban Areas WHO CAN APPLY: Local Governments and State Water Management Districts Contact FDEP for More Information 35 Developing a Realistic Plan (cont.) For Remaining Capital Needs, Should Balance Between Debt Financing and Pay-As-You-Go Capital Funding Debt Financing • Most Appropriate for Assets With Longer Service Lives (e.g., 15 Years or More) • As Part of Analysis, Consider Any Refinancing or Retirement Opportunities for Existing Debt That Could Lead to Cost Savings Pay-As-You-Go Capital Funding • Appropriate for Assets With Shorter Service Lives (e.g., Less than 15 Years) • Routine Capital Expenditures and Annual Renewals / Replacements CASHDEBT FUND • Ideally: Accrue Funds Based on Asset Replacement Schedule 36 Developing a Realistic Plan (cont.) Why Debt Finance? Advantages: Annual Cash Flow Reduced to Level of Debt Service Over Debt Term • Can Help Prevent “Rate Shock” to Existing Customers Funding Available Immediately Recovery of Capital Project Costs Spread Over Life of Debt Instrument to Match Asset Utilization (e.g., 30-Year Repayment Schedule, 30-Year Asset Service Life) • May Be Greater Fairness to Ratepayers If Utility Has Growth-Related Fees Such as Impact Fees, Can Allow More Time for “Growth to Pay for Growth”37 Debt Financing Options for Utility (to be discussed with Utility’s Financial Advisor) 38 Considerations How Much Does the Utility Need? How Soon Does the Utility Need It? Single Project / Program to Be Funded or Multiple Projects? Administrative Costs – Staff Time Required to Address Reporting Requirements • Could Also Outsource Reporting Availability of Funding and Probability That Financing Could Be Secured Under the Desired Terms Level of Complexity of Debt Instrument • Ease in Projecting Debt Payments for Financial Planning Purposes • Ease in Calculating Historical Coverage 39 Considerations (cont.) Borrowing Costs • Interest Rate • Issuance Costs • Life Cycle Costs (Total Amount Paid During Debt 20-Year 30-Year 20-Year Term) Amount Borrowed Clean Water SRF Loan $10,000,000 Revenue Bonds $10,000,000 Revenue Bonds $10,000,000 Issuance Costs (% of Principal) 2.00% 4.00% 4.00% Interest Rate 0.70% 4.06% 3.67% Term (Years) 20 30 20 Annual Debt Service Life Cycle Costs $537,562 $582,521 $714,477 $10,751,230 $17,475,640 $14,289,547 Political Climate for Raising Rates to Support Debt (Could Consider Wrapping Debt Service, Capitalized Interest, Line of Credit With Future Refinancing, Etc.) 40 Before Issuing / Incurring Debt: Adopt All Rate Increases Needed During Forecast Period • Shows a Commitment By Regulators to Raise Rates When Needed • Many Debt Financing Options Require Demonstration That Utility Can Repay Debt Consider Adopting Rate Indexing / Pass-Through Clause to Annually Adjust Rates Automatically for Inflation Without Formal Hearing • Gives Rating Agencies More Assurance That Rates Will Keep Up With Inflation To the Extent Possible, Incorporate Utility Best Management and Financial Practices Into Any Bond Resolution / Ordinance • Binding Agreement Between Regulators and Bondholders • Can Require Annual Renewal and Replacement Funding 41 • Can Make Utility System Closed-Loop Conventional Financing: Bank Loans Term Loans • Term Up to 20 Years • Fixed or Variable Interest Rates • Various Structuring Options Line of Credit • Common Draw Period of Up to 5 Years 42 Conventional Financing: Revenue Bonds Revenue Bonds • Repayment Pledged from Revenues of System • Rate Covenant and Other Requirements • Many Structuring Options – Wrapped Debt – Capitalized Interest – Interest-Only Payments Index Rev. Bond 20-Bond 11-Bond Current 4.06% 3.67% 3.19% Previous 4.10% 3.71% 3.23% Source for Bond Rates: Weekly Indexes, http://www.bondbuyer.com High 5.40% 5.03% 4.75% Low 4.06% 3.29% 3.14% 43 Conventional Financing: General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds AAA-RATED G.O. Bonds • Repayment Pledged from Full Faith • • • • and Credit of Local Government Lower Interest Rates Than Revenue Bonds Many Structuring Options Transfers from Enterprise Funds Could Be Used to Make Bond Payments Typically Requires Referendum Maturity ISSUE Range National 10 Year National 20 Year National 30 Year Florida 30 Year Today 2.25% 3.15% 3.50% 3.50% Last Week 2.30% 3.20% 3.55% 3.50% Today 2.75% 3.40% 3.65% 3.65% Last Week 2.80% 3.45% 3.70% 3.65% AA-RATED Maturity ISSUE Range National 10 Year National 20 Year National 30 Year Florida 30 Year A-RATED ISSUE National National National Florida Source for Bond Yields: http://www.fmsbonds.com/Market_Yields/index.asp Today 2.05% 2.80% 3.00% 3.00% Last Week 2.10% 2.85% 3.05% 3.00% Maturity Range 10 Year 20 Year 30 Year 30 Year 44 Short- to Intermediate-Term: Florida Local Government Finance Program Administered by Florida Association of Counties Flexible, Low-Interest Program • • • • Minimum $5,000,000; No Maximum Term Up to 5 Years No Prepayment Penalty Current All-In Interest Rate: 1.22% PURPOSE: Finance Infrastructure and Capital Needs, Including: ─ Water and Wastewater Facilities ─ Landfills WHO CAN APPLY: All Florida Local Governments 45 Small and Economically-Disadvantaged Communities: Water and Waste Disposal Loan Program Administered by USDA Affordable Funding to Communities Unable to Secure Commercial Credit on Reasonable Terms • Term Up to Useful Life of Facility; Maximum 40 Years • Current Interest Rate: 3.625% PURPOSE: Finance Acquisition, Construction, or Improvement of: ─ ─ ─ ─ Drinking Water Sourcing, Treatment, Storage and Distribution Sewer Collection, Transmission, Treatment, and Disposal Solid Waste Collection, Disposal, and Closure Stormwater WHO CAN APPLY: The Smaller and or More Financially-Distressed the Community, the Higher the Prioritization Score 46 State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program Administered by FDEP Very Good “Default” Debt Financing Option • 20-Year Standard Term • Up to 30-Year Term If Financially Disadvantaged Community Drinking Water Program • Eligible Projects: ─ New Water Treatment / Supply Facilities ─ New Transmission and Distribution Facilities ─ Rehabilitation or Upgrade of Existing Facilities Clean Water (Wastewater and Stormwater) Program • Eligible Projects: ─ New Wastewater Treatment / Disposal Facilities ─ New Collection and Transmission Facilities ─ Rehabilitation or Upgrade of Existing Facilities ─ Reclaimed / Reuse Water Facilities ─ Stormwater Projects Resulting in Water Quality Improvements 47 State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program (cont.) Advantages: Very Low, Below-Market Interest Rates • Drinking Water: 60% of 20-Year G.O. Bond Index • Clean Water: Affordability Factor Applied to 20-Year G.O. Bond Index Disbursements as Needed During Period of Construction Payments Begin 6 Months After Project Is Online • Capitalized Interest Through Period of Construction • Allows More Time to Phase-In Rates to Level Needed to Support Debt Subordinate Lien (Typically 115% Net Revenues Coverage Requirement) 48 State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program (cont.) Disadvantages: Administrative / Reporting Requirements • Can Outsource If In-House Resources Are Limited Available Funding May Be Limited (Fluctuates) Limited Debt Structuring Options Segment Caps May Not Be High Enough to Accommodate Cash Flow Needs • HOWEVER, Interim Financing Options Are Typically Available (e.g., Florida Rural Water Association Financing Program) 49 State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan Program (cont.) The Process: File Request for Inclusion Form • Can Include Multiple Projects (Multiple SRF Loans Upon Approval) File Facilities Plan / Business Plan / Planning Document / Capital Financing Plan With Supporting Documentation • Financial Information to Determine Ability to Repay Loan and Meet Coverage Requirements After Being Placed on “Fundable” List, Submit Complete Loan Application 50 Florida Municipal Loan Program (Bond Pool) Administered by Florida League of Cities Minimum Loan Size: $3 Million • Fixed Rate With Term Up to 30 Years • Economies of Scale Can Result in Lower Interest Rates and Lower Issuance Costs Eligible Projects: • • • • Capital Projects Renovations Fixed Asset Additions Refinancing of Existing Debt All Local Governments Can Apply 51 State Bond Loan Program (Pollution Control Bonds) Administered by FDEP and State Board of Administration Most Practical Loan Size: ≥ $10 Million • Projects Must Be Ready for Bidding When Loan Requested • Proceeds Available on Cost-Incurred Basis Eligible Projects: • • • • Water Supply and Distribution Facilities Stormwater Control and Treatment Projects Air and Water Pollution Control Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Repayment of Bonds Pledged from Full Faith and Credit of State Repayment Term Generally Representative of Project Useful Life 52 State Bond Loan Program (Pollution Control Bonds) (cont.) Advantages: Possibly Lower Interest Rate Than What Local Government Could Secure Low Issuance Costs Sizeable Loans Available Disadvantages: Coverage Requirement of 1.33 Time to Arrange for Loan: Financial Analysis, Bond Validation, and Bond Marketing Activities Require More Than Six Months to Complete 53 SOME FINAL THOUGHTS: Developing Financial Plan: Many Possibilities (No Single “Right Answer”) Should Make Sure Any Financial Advice Is Objective Debt Financing Programs and Opportunities Continue to Evolve May Not Be Able to Solve All Financial Issues at Once, Especially If Utility Is “Playing Catch Up” • May Need to Take Small Steps Over Time to Gradually Build the Financial Position to an Optimal Level Financial Plan Should: • • • • Be Reasonable and Affordable Allow Utility to Accomplish Objectives Promote Sustainability Enable Utility to Meet Financial Targets (Without Significantly Exceeding Them) 54 SOME FINAL THOUGHTS (cont.): Should Ideally Build / Establish Long-Term History of Following Plan and Meeting Targets For the Long-Term Interests of Customers, Operational and Financial Planning – Including Ratemaking – Should Be Proactive, Not Reactive • Lower User Rates Over the Long-Term • Balanced Debt Risk • Higher Credit Rating When Debt Financing 55 QUESTIONS AND DISCUSSION 56 Thank You! If You Have Questions Regarding This Presentation or Would Like Additional Information, Please Contact: Bryan A. Mantz, CMC, CGFM Public Resources Management Group, Inc. 341 North Maitland Avenue, Suite 300 Maitland, Florida 32751 Phone: 407-628-2600 Email: bmantz@prmginc.com Website: www.prmginc.com 57