The Supreme Court & The Constitution The Living Constitution The Road to the Bill of Rights The Amendment Process The Supreme Court & the Amendment Process The Living Constitution In the U.S. the ultimate keeper of the constitutional conscience is the a. b. c. d. president Congress Supreme Court politicians The major tool of the courts in checking the power of other government branches has been a. b. c. d. impeachment habeas corpus judicial review common law The court case that established the practice of judicial review was a. b. c. d. Marbury v. Madison McCulloch v. Maryland Lochner v. New York Printz v. United States Law that are higher than human law is referred to as a. b. c. d. statutory law universal law natural law constitutional law The Bill of Rights refers to the first ____ amendments to the U.S. Constitution. a. b. c. d. two ten seven twelve The Road to the Bill of Rights The Articles of Confederation: The First Constitution Provisions of the Articles A loose confederation of independent states Weak central government Shortcomings of the Articles Indebtedness and inability to finance its activities Inability to defend American interests in foreign affairs Commercial warfare among the states Convening the Constitutional Convention Consensus that a new Constitution was desperately needed Yet, growing concern by influential citizens about democratizing and egalitarian tendencies Why the Founders Were Worried An Excess of Democracy in the States In the mid-1780s, popular conventions were established to monitor and control the actions of state legislators. The Pennsylvania state constitution replaced the property qualifications as a requirement to vote with a very small tax. The Threat to Property Rights in the States Popular opinion Stay acts Shay’s Rebellion The Constitutional Convention By 1787, most of America’s leaders were convinced that the new nation was in great danger of failing. Delegates to the Constitutional Convention Wealthy men, well-educated Young, but with broad experience in American politics Familiar with the great works of Western philosophy and political science Debate Over the Intentions of the Framers Historian Charles Beard: The framers were engaged in a conspiracy to protect their personal economic interests. Although the reality is surely more complex, broad economic and social-class motives were likely important. Consensus Among the 55 Delegates Agreement that a new constitution must replace the the Articles of Confederation Support for a substantially strengthened national government Concern that a strong national government is potentially tyrannical Belief in a republican form of government based on popular consent Desire to insulate government from public opinion and popular democracy The Changing Constitution, Democracy, and American Politics The Constitution is the basic rule book for the game of American politics. Constitutional rules Apportion power and responsibility among governmental branches Define the fundamental nature of relationships between governmental institutions Specify how individuals are to be selected for office Tell how the rules themselves may be changed The Struggle to Ratify the Constitution Delegates had been instructed to propose alterations to the Articles of Confederation, but they wrote an entirely new Constitution instead. Ratification was a difficult process. — favored ratification Anti-Federalists — opposed ratification Federalists The Compromise with Ratification Ratification of the U.S. Constitution State Delaware Pennsylvania New Jersey Georgia Connecticut Massachusetts Maryland South Carolina New Hampshire Virginia New York North Carolina Rhode Island Date December 7, 1787 December 12, 1787 December 18, 1787 January 2, 1788 January 9, 1788 February 6, 1788 April 28, 1788 May 23, 1788 June 21, 1788 June 25, 1788 July 26, 1788 November 21, 1789 May 29, 1790 Vote 30 - 0 46 - 23 38 - 0 26 - 0 128 - 0 187 - 168 * 63 - 11 149 - 73 * 57 - 46 * 89 - 79 * 30 - 27 * 194 - 77 * 34 - 32 * Proposed Amendments not passed with the Bill of Rights Article I – Apportionment After the first enumeration required by the first article of the Constitution, there shall be one representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred representatives, nor less than one representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than two hundred representatives, nor more than one representative for every fifty thousand persons. Article II – Congressional pay raises No law varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened. (ratified in 1992 as Twenty-seventh Amendment) The Amendment Process Proposing Amendments Ratifying Amendments The Time for Ratification of the 27 Amendments to the Constitution Unsuccessful Amendment Proposals Over 10,000 considered 33 were sent to States for ratification, including Child labor amendment in 1924 Equal rights amendment in 1972 Others in consideration include A balanced budget amendment Term limits for House of Reps. And Senators Presidential Line item veto power Prohibit flag desecration The Supreme Court & The Amendment Process Instigator and Interpreter Five Amendments that overturned Supreme Court Decisions 11th overturned Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) 13th overturned Scott v. Sandford (1857) 14th overturned Scott v. Sandford (1857) 16th overturned Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. (1895) 26th overturned Oregon v. Mitchell (1970) Instigator and Interpreter Proposals to overturn Supreme Court Decisions A human life amendment to overturn Roe v. Wade (1973) A school prayer amendment to overturn Engel v. Vitale (1962) & School District of Abington Township v. Schempp (1963) A flag desecration amendment to overturn Texas v. Johnson (1989) A term limit amendment to overturn U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton (1994) Court’s Interpretation of Article V Coleman v. Miller (1939) Now v. Idaho (1982) Other issue: Constitutional Conventions Are delegates limited to the amendment under consideration? OR Are they free to deliberate on any part of the Constitution? Coleman v. Miller Advocates Docket: 7 Citation: 307 U.S. 433 (1939) Petitioner: Coleman Respondent: Miller Abstract Oral Argument: April 17-18, 1939 Decision: Monday, June 5, 1939 Issues: the "political question doctrine" Categories: Article V of the Constitution, Judicial Review Facts of the Case In June, 1924, the Congress proposed an amendment to the Constitution, known as the Child Labor Amendment. In January, 1925, the Legislature of Kansas adopted a resolution rejecting the proposed amendment and a certified copy of the resolution was sent to the Secretary of State of the United States. In January, 1937, a resolution was introduced in the Senate of Kansas ratifying the proposed amendment. When the resolution came up for consideration, there was a 20-20 tie vote. The Lieutenant Governor, the presiding officer of the Senate, cast the tie breaking vote. The resolution was later adopted by the House of Representatives on the vote of a majority of its members. Question Does the Congress of the United States—when proposing for ratification an amendment to the United States Constitution pursuant to Article V—have to specify a deadline within which the state legislatures (or conventions held in the states) must act upon the proposed amendment? Conclusion All amendments to the Federal Constitution are considered pending before the states indefinitely unless Congress establishes a deadline within which the states must act. Further, Congress— not the courts—is responsible for deciding if an amendment has been validly ratified.