Proposal “The influence of Management by Values on Service quality in Russian subsidiaries of International Hotel Chains” Malina (Sirotovskaya) A.E. Postgraduate student Higher School of Economics, Faculty of Management Background of the study Key words: Management by Values, Human Resource Management, Service Quality, Hotel Industry. Within the present rapid changing global environment, companies need to respond immediately to the changes and at the same time preserve their uniqueness in order to survive and remain competitive. This applies to hotel sector more especially in which hotel companies try to find ways to retain clients by increasing intangible service which also means that how a service is delivered is a critical factor in any evaluation of quality (Morisson, 1996; Schneider & Bowen, 1993; Lin & Tsaur, 2004). In other words, service quality depends on employees’ performance and efforts to promote it must therefore be based on Human Resource Management (HRM) (Schneider & Bowen, 1985). Predictably previous management approaches such as Management by Instructions (MBI) and Management by Objectives (MBO) which require a high level of formalization and control in the middle of the 20th century are logically replaced by more flexible model - Management by Values (MBV), focused on service quality, professionalism and autonomy of employees (Magun, 2001; Dolan, 2002). The emergence of MBV approach in Russia is confirmed by Russian research study, which established that about 80% of organizations including international hotel companies have officially declared corporate values on their Web-sites (Kabalina & Kokorina, 2012). At the same time the recent impressive growth of hotel sector in Russia was clearly accelerated by arrival of international hotel chains in 1990-s at first in Moscow with their global strategy and corporate values as investment in this region due to attractive government programs (Burnatseva, 2010). However one of the problem fields for further studies is the question about the effect of the translation of corporate values. How these values reflect in employees’ behavior and how it reflects on service quality? 1 Problem statement Predictably there are many publications dealing with issues of hotel chains internationalization and entry success strategies (Chathoth & Olsen 2003; Chen & Dimou, 2005; Leo & Philippe, 2011). At the same time only few publications on the international hotel chains activities in Russia were found (Balaeva, 2012; Burnatseva, 2010; Katkalo and Shemrakova, 2008; Stene, 2007). Moreover, despite the sufficient amount of studies that confirm the relationship between the existence of MBV and the performance results such as reputation and finance indicators (Donker, 2008; Loe, 2000; Pava & Krausz, 1996; Van, 2005), there are quite few studies that investigate the relationship between management by values through human resource practices and quality of service in hotel industry in particular (Donker, 2008, Stackman, 2000). Taking into account huge hotel market capacity in Russia further research based on particular cases is needed. The purpose of this study is to empirically explore the relationships between MBV practices through Human Resource Management practices and employees’ performance dealing with the delivering service to the clients in Moscow units of international hotel chains, to establish the causes and conditions of their emergence. Theoretical frameworks Corporate Values and Management by Values Approach Particular relevance of the studies which explore Management by Values approach is confirmed by the variety of existing studies. There are some papers that are devoted to peculiarities of corporate values translation to the employees (Sussman, 1989; Klemm, 1991; Begley, 2000; Grof, 2001); to reflection of corporate values in the employees’ and leaders’ behavior (Somers, 2001; Klenke, 2005; Baker, 2005). Moreover there are empirical studies about the influence of corporate values on the satisfaction and commitment (Hunt, 1989; Weaver, 2012); also about the revealing the connection about individual values and corporate values, about value congruence (Berrin, 2004; Suar, 2010; Siegal, 2002; Pozner, 1985). Logically there are a lot of studies about the influence of corporate values on financial results of the companies (Donker, 2008; Keller, 2006; Loe, 2000; Pava & Krausz, 1996; Van, 2005). Kenneth Kernaghan (2003) defines values as “enduring beliefs that influence the choices we make among available means or ends” (p. 711). Values are desirable states, goals or behaviors on which individuals place a high worth (Elizur, Borg, Hunt, & Beck, 1991) that allow them to choose from among available options. The concept of “corporate (organizational) values” refers to the source of values—personal, societal, or organizational (Elizur et al., 1991; Van Wart, 1998). 2 “Corporate value,” refers to the important principles that guide the behavior of the organization (Liedtka, 1989) and are communicated and rewarded within the organization (Elizur et al., 1991; Van Wart,1998; Weiner, 1988). Similar approach is to identify corporate values as the criteria by which employees make decisions about priorities (Christensen, 2001). Within an organization, a strong value system is said to exist when organization members share key values related to acceptable behavior within the organization and the organization’s strategic direction (Weiner, 1988) and, more important, that they share the espoused values of organizational leaders (Deal & Kennedy, 1982). That is why they are often defined as the shared values of all employees. These shared values are relatively stable, enduring and interact with employees and organizational structure to produce patterns of behavior (Chatman, 1991). Corporate (organizational) values can be categorized as functional or instrumental— focusing on desired modes of conduct—or end state—describing desired outcomes such as organizational prestige or financial condition (Liedkta, 1991; Osborne, 1996; Weiner, 1988). Functional values provide cues to acceptable workplace behavior and generally include such priorities as honesty, diversity, and hard work. In contrast, instrumental values are strategic values that “provide the rationale” for the activities of the organization and link the organization to the environment and its stakeholders. Management by values approach means new way of Company’s Management, which has a triple purpose: a) Simplifying the organisational complexity created by the ever-increasing need to adapt to change at all levels in the company; b) Guiding strategic vision towards the future destination of the company; and c) Securing commitment of every employee to deliver a high quality performance in the day-to-day work (Dolan, Garcia, 2002). In practical business terms, the aim of MBV is to create conditions under which all employees can perform independently and effectively toward a single objective (O’Toole, 1996). Traditionally the corporate values are established by the founders and compounded further by the personalities and transforming activities of their inheritors (Anthony, 1994; Collins and Porras, 1997). However Britting (2000) offered another approach to identify the roots of corporate values in the organization – when managers and employees create general base of values and then rely on it in their behavior (Britting,2000). One of the most significant problems in empirical research devoted to Management by Values is to identify the criteria of the existence of MBV in the company. Scwarts suggests to consider three elements of MBV system – politics (documents, codes of ethics, nonfinancial reports), processes and practices (Scwarts, 2005). Moreover researchers emphasize that Human Resource Management elements (recruiting, adaptation, training and development, compensation and benefits) are the way to broadcast corporate values to employees (Trevinio, 2001). 3 In response to this shift, some organizations now devote significant energy to integrating values and beliefs into their business practices. Hotel companies are facing increasing competition from other lodging units. This increased competition has forced traditional tourist hotels to find ways to retain current clients and attract competitors’ clients (Tsaur,2002). Increased service quality through increased employee performance, by which corporate values are delivered, is a viable way for hotels to remain competitive (Tsaur, 2002). Studies devoted to Management by values through Human Resource Management practices in the connection with service quality in the hotel industry in Russia and other emerging markets even in developed countries are extremely poorly illuminated in literature. Accordingly to this fact it seems necessary to reveal the connection between service quality and Hyman Resource Management in the hotel companies in the existing empirical studies. Service quality in the connection with Human Resource Management in the Hotel Companies Services are typically intangible and non-standardized. The intangibility of services also means that how a service is delivered is a critical factor in any evaluation of quality (Morrison, 1996; Schneider &Bowen, 1993). In other words, service quality depends heavily on the effectiveness with which front-line employees deal with customers and clients. Efforts to promote service quality must therefore be based on managing employee behavior (Schneider & Bowen, 1985). Morrison (1996) suggested that a firm’s human resource management practices can create an environment that elicit more customer-oriented behavior from employees. In turn, the behavior that employees display will positively impact on service quality. The author discussed this issue conceptually, but no systematic empirical investigation was published identifying which dimensions of HRM practices and specific forms of service behavior lead to higher service quality in hotels. Although the connection between HRM practices and service quality may be intuitively relative, the underlying logic is that there must be mediating variables between HRM practices and customers’ perceptions of service quality. More specifically, it stands to reason that a customer will, in part, evaluate service quality on the basis of employees’ behavior rather than HRM practices, though organizational HRM practices and employees’ service behavior may be related. Further research in Taiwan was conducted between 68 hotels in 2004. The study showed evidence of the positive relationship between training and higher levels of employee service behavior in tourist hotel. Fey (2000) suggested that salary level was revealed to be significantly 4 associated with the firm’s performance for both managers and non-managers. The empirical results indicate that the employee perceptions of HRM practices of ‘‘compensation/benefits’’, are like ‘‘training/ development’’, linked to employee service behavior in tourist hotel. Employees who experience positive HRM practices on the three dimensions ‘‘recruitment/selection’’, ‘‘training/ development’’ and ‘‘compensation/benefits’’ may thus be more positive, courteous and helpful toward customers. It has been argued that the better employee service behavior is perceived, the better is service quality perceived by customers in tourist hotels (Williams,1999; Hartline & Jones, 1996). Tsaur (2004) reported findings to indicate that there was a positive relationship between service behavior and service quality in the tourist hotel. It indicated when employees demonstrated excellent service behavior, the customers perception of service quality were increased. Consistent with the study of Parasuraman et al. (1985), customers specially appreciate the service encounter while measuring service quality. Bowen and Schneider (1985) demonstrated that customer-oriented service behavior influenced the perceived service quality of customers from the customers’ viewpoint. The results of Tsaur study proved this. The empirical relationship between service behavior and service quality revealed that ‘‘extra-role’’ service behavior positively affect the reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy dimensions of service quality. On the other hand role-prescribed behavior and service quality affected only the empathy dimension. This might be because routine and duty jobs are difficult to leave a deep impression on customers. However, the tourist hotels that were sampled specially emphasize job requirements and employees are strictly required to show ‘‘enthusiasm’’ while serving customers and this may have impacted on the findings (Tsaur, 2004). Previous studies have reported that there was a positive relationship between HRM practices and service quality (Morrison, 1996; Schneider et al., 1985). Bettencourt et al. (1997) suggested that research should explore why some employees are more eager than others to offer suggestions to help the firm improve its service? What HRM practices factors lead contact employees to become enthusiastic advocates of the firm’s services? The empirical result of Tsaur study demonstrated that HRM practices do affect service quality directly, and indirectly, through service behavior. Specifically, through the positive service behavior delivered by HRM practices, the perceived service quality of customers could be promoted. Theoretical model For most service industries, quality is occurred in service encounter (Parasuraman et al., 1988). Service encounters involve interaction between customers and employees (Bettencourt et al., 1997; Winsted, 2000) so employees will have an important role to play in influencing 5 customers’ perceptions ofservice encounters (Bitner, 1990; King & Garey, 1997). Hereupon service capability means the degrees of required knowledge, skills and concepts required for the line employee to offer excellent service (Jaworski & Kohli, 1993; Berry, Conant, & Parasuraman, 1991). Hallowell, Schlesinger, and Zornitsky (1996) indicated that service capability is defined as an employee’s perception of this or her ability to serve the customer and that it is a direct antecedent of customer satisfaction. In summary, besides the requirements of positive service behavior, the frontline employees must possess appropriate service capability to provide a good service for customers. The probable framework could be illustrated in the following way (figure 1). Management by Values Declared values Politics Processes Practices HRM practices Recruitment/ selection, training/ development, compensation/ benefits. Performance appraisal Service quality The reflection of declared corporate values Service behavior Extra-Role service Role prescribed service Figure 1. Model of relationship among MBV through HRM practices, service behavior and service quality Research questions and hypotheses The purpose of this study is to empirically explore the relationships between MBV practices through Human Resource Management practices and employees’ performance dealing with the delivering service to the clients in Moscow units of international hotel chains, to establish the causes and conditions of their emergence. 6 In more concrete terms, questions were formulated in the following way: What managers in the hotel sector mean by Management by values? What are the indicators of this system? What are the levels of the development of this system? How this approach is implemented in Russian subsidiaries of the international hotel chains? How corporate values are translated from parents’ companies and why? Do any of HRM practices reflect corporate values in Russian subsidiaries and if yes, through what HRM practices are corporate values translated first of all and why? What problems do managers anticipate when a management by values philosophy is intended to be implemented in Russia? Is there any correlation between dominant HRM practices for translating corporate values and the type of hotel (number of stars, e.g.)? What are the differences for translating corporate values through HRM practices for managerial and non – managerial employees in the hotels? Is there a relationship between HRM practices for translating corporate values to the employees and employees’ performance (in the terms of employees’ and customers’ perception) according to experts’ view (General Managers, HR Managers, Heads of the Departments? To be more specific in accordance with literature review hypotheses were formulated in the following way. H0: There is a connection between Management by Values through HRM practices, employees’ behavior and service quality. Under this assumption I rely on the results of number of studies in HRM that reveal positive connection between HRM practices, employees’ behavior and service quality (Schneider and Bowen, 1985, Zerbe, Dobni, and Harel, 1998, Tsaur, 2004). Further development of the original hypothesis on the basis on the results of these studies led me to formulation consequential hypotheses. Relating MBV through HRM practices to employee service behavior Behavioral patterns have many important implications, both theoretical and practical, for virtually all kinds of human resource practices including job analysis, recruitment, selection, training, development, performance appraisal, compensation, and even labor and employee relations (Werner, 2000). How an organization manages its human resources establishes the tone and conditions of the employee–employer relationship. And in turn that impacts on employee behavior. For example, Schneider and Bowen (1985) found that, when employees perceive their organization as one that facilitates performance, enhances career opportunities, provides positive 7 supervision, and so on, they are then free to do the organization’s main work of serving customers. Zerbe, Dobni, and Harel (1998) reported that employee perceptions of HRM practices had a direct effect on self-reported service behavior. So that these premises lead to the first hypothesis in the connection with Management by Values approach. H1. MBV practices through HRM will be positively related to employee service behavior (reflecting corporate values in employees’ behavior) (Tsaur, 2004). Relating service behavior to service quality Employee service behaviors could be ‘‘extra-role’’ and ‘‘role-prescribed’’. This definition is consistent with that prosocial service behavior in the organizational behavior or marketing literatures (Bettencourt & Brown, 1997; Brief& Motoeidlo, 1986; Organ, 1988). ‘‘Extra-role’’ service behavior refers to the discretionary behavior of contact employees in serving customers that extends beyond formal role requirements. Recent marketing literature highlights the importance of contact employees ‘‘delighting’’ the customer by providing ‘‘little extras’’, and ‘‘extra attention’’ exceptional service during the service encounter (Bettencourt & Brown, 1997; Bitner et al., 1990; Kelley & Hoffman, 1997). ‘‘Role-prescribed’’ service behavior refers to expected employees behavior that may derive from implicit norms in the workplace or from explicit obligations as specified in organizational documents such as job descriptions (Brief& Motoeidlo, 1986; Puffer, 1987). For example, hotels monitor role-prescribed service behavior such as greeting the customer by name, answering the phone within three rings, and making a personal pledge to a customer that a request will be handled. Marketing studies reinforce the importance of similar behaviors for customer service quality perceptions (Bitner et al., 1990; Keaveney, 1995; Parasuraman et al., 1988). Based on this discussion, employee service behavior will be positively related to service quality. H2. Employee service behavior will be positively related to service quality (Tsaur, 2004). Relating HRM practices to service quality It has been argued that in service organizations quality improvement must be focused on the selection, training, and compensation ofemploy ees. (Lovelock, 1985; Schlesinger & Heskett, 1991; Schneider et al., 1985, 1995). Fey et al. (2000) found that salary level was significantly associated with firm performance for both managers and non-managers. Schneider et al. (1985) also found that employee perceptions of HRM practices were significantly related to customer perceptions of service quality. Hartline and Jones (1996) indicated that in the hotel, contact employees should receive the necessary training in order to deliver high quality service. Previous HRM research has 8 addressed that in the service industry, finding a positive relationship between employee perceptions of organizational practices and customer ratings of organizational effectiveness (Tornw & Wiley, 1991; Gilbert, 1991). These finding lead to the next hypothesis regarding the relationship between employee perceptions of HRM practices for translating corporate values and customer perceptions of service quality. H3. HRM practices for translating corporate values will be positively related to service quality. The role of service behavior between HRM practices for translation corporate values and service quality Ulrich, Halbrook, Meder, Stuchlik, and Thorpe (1991) argued that selection, hiring, appraisal, promotions, and reward administration practices can be used to ‘‘increase the shared mindset among employees and customers’’, which leads to the organization attracting customers and being competitive. In other words, when employees feel well treated by management’s human resource practices, they can devote their energies and resources to effectively treating clients. Researches on the dimensions of service quality also support the hypothesized relationship between customer-oriented behavior and service quality assessments. Key dimensions of service quality such as empathy, assurance and responsiveness (Parasuraman et al., 1988) are all potentially enhanced through the performance of customer- oriented behavior resulting in more favorable evaluations of overall service quality. Kelley and Hoffman (1997) reported that employees who help customers by performing customer-oriented behavior during the service delivery process are more likely to feel better about the service quality than those who do not act prosocially toward the customer. Morrison (1996) identifies HRM practices that can be used to elicit service behavior and hence service quality. In these models employee service behaviors are shown to mediate the relationship between the hypothesized antecedents and consequences. Thus, the following hypothesis will be tested. H4. The relationship between HRM practices for translating corporate values and service quality would be mediated by service behavior in hotels. Human Resource Management differentiation for translating corporate values The literature on human resource practices system differentiation (HRPSD; Lepak & Snell, 1999; Lepak, Taylor, Tekleab, Marrone, & Cohen, 2007; Tsui et al., 1997) suggests that poor or low investment HR practices exist in many industries, but are more evident in the hotel industry because of the sector’s reliance on low skilled employees such as cleaners, luggage porters, waiters and kitchen helpers (Kelliher & Johnson, 1997). While the previous literature examining the hotel industry has criticized this as poor HR practices, the HRPSD concept 9 suggests that hotels may not in fact be using poor HR practices, but rather, they have matched their HR practices system with employees’ strategic value. HRPSD is a management process where different HR practices are applied to groups of employees based on their perceived ‘strategic value’ to the organisation (Lepak & Snell, 1999). HR practices system is the integrated composite of HR functions such as selecting, recruiting, training and development, performance management, compensation management, employment security, functional flexibility, empowerment and employee involvement (Pare & Tremblay, 2007). Having more than one HR practices system, it is suggested, helps ensure human capital investment efficiency because investment is higher in the HR practices system for jobs that are perceived to have high strategic value and lower for the opposite (Lepak & Snell, 1999, 2002; Lepak, Takeuchi, & Snell, 2003; Lepak et al., 2007). Regardless of the economic circumstances, HRPSD is an important topic because of the direct links between employee perceptions of the workplace practices and organizational performance. It is well established in the ‘service climate’ literature that employee perceptions about the workplace are linked to important organizational outcomes such as customer satisfaction, loyalty and profitability (Schneider, Parkington, & Buxton, 1980; Schneider & White, 2004; Schneider, White, & Paul, 1998; Solnet & Paulsen, 2005). Despite clear financial benefits to such practice, firms must also consider how HRPSD affects employees’ attitude and behaviour as this may mediate the relation between organisation’s strategy and firm’s long-term performance (Lepak et al., 2007). Although studies of the hotel industry have previously acknowledged that the HR practices for managerial employees may differ from non-managerial employees (Hales & Klidas, 1998; Hoque, 2000; Kelliher & Johnson, 1997; McGunnigle & Jameson, 2000), extant HR management studies have yet to investigate and provide an in-depth explanation of how HRPSD is applied in the industry (Hoque, 2000; Kelliher & Johnson, 1997). There is very limited number of studies focusing on SHRM in developing countries. Moreover HRMSD in the aspect of translating values and in the connection with service quality hasn’t investigated in Russia yet. Hotels tend to employ more innovative HR practices among managerial employees than on other employees because managers are perceived to be more responsible and capable of handling extra responsibility (Hales, 1987). So this leads to the final hypothesis of this paper. H5. The differentiation of HRM practices for translating corporate values will be positively related to service quality (Rozial Ahmad, 2005) 10 Methodology description The research aim is very huge and therefore in the methodological aspect I am going to separate several stages of the research and use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Sample of study (Moscow units) was selected due to researcher’s ability to access information in this country. Predictably on the first stage of my research I have already made the qualitative case study in one hotel company in order to understand the philosophy of MBV system and indicators of this system with the help of interviews with experts. Having decided to draw a comparison among MBV systems through HRM practices in organizations on the second stage of the research, I am in process of taking part in conducting CRANET (Cranfield Network on Comparative Human Resource Management) SURVEY as it is regarded as the most complete and representative independent survey of the practices and techniques of HRM in the world. Any research group that wishes to conduct a similar study in a new country may receive the data set from the research center. This is a study conducted in the form of biennial surveys of HR managers’ opinions in organizations, implemented in 1989 and currently taking place in 32 countries - participants. The third wave of the survey in Russia is in process now. It is expected to receive at least 100 completed questionnaires. The next stage of the survey is going to be the case-study in Moscow unit of international hotel chain. In order to measure employees’ performance in connection with reflecting corporate values using the scale, developed by Bettencourt et al. (1997), for assessment of two aspects by a 5-point scale: Extra-Role service behavior and Role-Prescribed Service behavior. In addition, one more instrument will be used for measuring employees’ service capability, it is called SERVQUAL scale (Parasuraman et al., 1988) with ranging service in connection with reflection of corporate values using five- point scale ranging from ‘much worse than I expected’ to “much better than I expected” with the help of clients. Also clients’ reviews will be analyzed with the help of content analysis on the web-sites of customer reviews. The data will be analyzed in special statistical program SPSS, version 17.0Statistical Package for the Social Sciences in order to test hypotheses. The limitations of the study The study findings may be limited by the limitations of CRANET survey which is going to be used in this research. Also the sample limitations are quite a substantial. The results anticipated in this study may not be generalized to hotel companies outside of Russia to different emerging markets because of their individual peculiarities and different external environment. 11 Implications for practice and further research The results anticipated are going to be unique for Russia and also hold several implications for hotel industry in Russia. The research study will be of primary significance to Hotel Chief Operational Managers, HR-managers, marketing managers and middle managers in hospitality industry. Moreover, this work might be also useful for other countries and researchers in HRM sphere and MBV in hospital industry; undergraduate and graduate students of hospitality management. Managers may use the findings to explore and to improve methods of translating corporate value in Russia and to compare the results in different countries as the methodology used in this research will allow to do it. At the same time researchers may enhance understanding of the relationship between HRM practices for translating corporate values and its effect regarding to the delivery of service. The results of the proposed study may help students in exploring MBV and HRM practices. This study suggests several avenues for further research. First, this paper begins to explore the question ofcausality. However, causality can only really be tested with data collected at different point in time. In future, researchers might consider a longitudinal investigation to demonstrate the causal relationship. References Anthony, P. (1994) Managing Culture. London: Sage, pp. 29. Baker, T. Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of corporate ethical values. // Journal of Business Research. 2006. Vol.59. pp. 849857. Balaeva, O., Burnatseva, E., Predvoditeleva, M., Sheresheva, M. & Tretyak, O. (2012). Network Strategies of Hospitality Companies in Emerging and Transitory Economies: Evidence from Russia. In N.Delener (Ed.). Service Science Research, Strategy and Innovation: Dynamic Knowledge Management Methods. Hershey, Pennsylvania (USA): IGI Global, 519-546 Begley, T. Articulating Corporate Values through Human Resource Policies. // Business Horizons. 2000 Bettencourt, L. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Contact employee: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 39–61. Bitner, M. J. (1990). Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. Journal of Marketing, 54, 69–82. Brief, A. P., & Motoeidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 11, 710–725. 12 Chatman, J. A. (1991). Matching people and organizations: selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, pp. 459-484. Chathoth, P.K. & Olsen, M.D. (2003). Strategic alliances: a hospitality industry perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 22(4): 419-434. Chen, J.J. & Dimou, I. (2005). Expansion strategy of international hotel firms. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1730-1740. Christensen, C. M. (2001) Assessing Your Organization’s Innovation Capabilities. Leader to Leader, No. 21 Summer 2001. Collins, J. C. & Porras, J. I. (1997) Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley. Dolan, S., Garcia, S. & Auerbach, A. (2002) Understanding and Managing chaos in organizations. International Journal of Management. 20 (1), 23-29. Donker H., Deborah P. & Zahir S. (2008) Corporate Values, Codes of Ethics, and Firm Performance: A Look at the Canadian Context. Journal of Business Ethics. 82 (3), 527-537. Elizur, D., Borg, I., Hunt, R., & Beck, I. M. (1991). The structure of work values: A cross cultural comparison. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 21-38. Fey, C. F., Bjorkman, I., & Pavlovskaya, A. (2000). The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance in Russia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(1), 1–18. Grof A. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. // MCB University Press. 2001. Vol.6. pp. 193-198 Hallowell, R., Schlesinger, L. A., & Zornitsky, J. (1996). Internal service quality, customer and job satisfaction: Linkages and implications for management. Human Resource Planning, 19, 20–31. Hartline, M. D., & Jones, K. C. (1996). Employee performance cues in a hotel service environment: Influence on perceived service quality, value, and word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Business Research, 35(3), 207–215. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70. Katkalo, V.S. & Shemrakova, V.N. (2008). Networking Strategies in Hospitality Business. St. Petersburg: Graduated School of Management. Kelliher, C., & Johnson, K. (1997). Personnel management in hotels—an update: A move to human resource management? Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3, 321–331. 13 Kelley, S. W., & Hoffman, K. D. (1997). An investigation of positive affect, prosocial behaviors and service quality. Journal of Retailing, 73(3), 407–427. King, C., & Garey, J. G. (1997). Relational quality in service encounters. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 16(1), 39–63 Klemm M., Sanderson S., Luffman G. Mission Statements: Selling Corporate Values to Employees. // Long Range Planning. 1991. Vol. 24. № 3. pp. 73-78 Klenke, K. Corporate values as multi-level, multi-domain antecedents of leaders behavior. // International Journal of Manpower. 2005. Vol. 26. № 1 Lepak, D.P., & Snell, S.A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 31–48. Lepak, D.P., Taylor, M.S., Tekleab, A., Marrone, J.A., & Cohen, D.J. (2007). An examination of the use of high investment human resource systems for core and support employees. Human Resource Management, 46(2), 223–246. Leo, P.-Y. & Philippe, J. (2011). Influence of entry modes and relationship modes on Business services internationalisation. The Service Industries Journal, Special Issue: Tourism Services. 31(4). Liedtka, J. (1989). Value congruence: The interplay of individual and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 805-815. Loe T., Ferrell L. & Mansfield P. (2000) A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics. 25, 185-204. Lovelock, C. H. (1985). Developing and managing the customerservice function in the service sector. In J. A. Czepiel, M. R. Soloman, C. F. Surprenant, & E. G. Gutman (Eds.), The Service Encounter (pp. 42–54). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. Morrison, E. W. (1996) Organizational citizenship behavior as a critical link between HRM practices and service quality. Human Resource Management. 35(4), 493–512. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organization citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. O’Toole, J. (1996) Leading Change. USA: Ballantine Books. Osborne, R. L. (1996). Strategic values: The corporate performance engine. Business Horizons, 39(5), 41-47. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A. & Berry, L. L. (1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing. 64(1), 12–40. Pare, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organisational commitment and citizenship behaviours on 14 information technology professionals’ turnover intentions. Group & Organisation Management, 32(3), 326–357. Pava, M. & Krausz, J. (1996) The association between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics. 1996. 15, 321357. Schlesinger, L. A., & Heskett, J. L. (1991). The service-driven service company. Harvard Business Review, 71–81. Schneider, B. & Bowen, D. E. (1993) The service organization: Human resource management is crucial. Organizational Dynamics. 21, 39–52. Schneider, B., & Bowen, D. E. (1985) Employee and customer perceptions of service in banks: Replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology. 70(3), 423–433. Somers, M. Ethical Codes of Conduct and Organizational Context: A Study of the relationship between Codes of Conduct, Employee Behavior and Organizational Values. // Journal of Business Ethics. 2001. Vol. 30. pp. 185-195. Tsaur S & Lin Y. (2004) Promoting service quality in tourist hotels: the role of HRM practices and service behavior. Tourism Management 25, 471-481 Tsui, A.S., Pearce, J.L., Porter, L.W., & Tripoli, A.M. (1997). Alternative approaches to the employee-organisation relationship: Does investment in employees pay off? Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089–1121. Ulrich, D., Halbrook, R., Meder, D., Stuchlik, M., & Thorpe, S. (1991). Employee and customer attachments: Synergies for competitive advantage. Human Resource Planning, 14(2), 89–104. Van Lee R., Fabish L. & Mcgaw. (2005) The value of Corporate Values. Strategy and Business. 39, 1-15. Van Wart, M. (1998). Changing public sector values. New York: Garland. Weiner, Y. (1988). Forms of value systems: A focus on organizational effectiveness and cultural change and maintenance. Academy of Management Review, 13, 534-545. Williams, J. G. (1999). The impact of employee performance cues on guest loyalty, perceived value and service quality. The Service Industries Journal, 19(3), 97–118. Winsted, K. F. (2000). Service behaviors the lead to satisfied customers. European Journal of Marketing, 34(3), 399–417. Zerbe, W. J., Dobni, D., & Harel, G. H. (1998). Promoting employee service behavior: The role of perceptions of human resource management practices and service culture. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 15(2), 165–179. 15