Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE University of Arizona College of Education Department of Teaching, Learning, and Sociocultural Studies LRC 312c: Early Language and Literacy Development (3 units) Spring 2015, 3 units/credits COURSE SYLLABUS1 INSTRUCTOR: Nayalin Feller, M.A. 520-220-8439 nfeller@email.arizona.edu TEACHING ASSISTANT: Ana Fierro, M.A. avfierro@email.arizona.edu ECE Family and Community Liaison Coordinator: Rebecca Zapien 520-626-6419 (office) 520-481-4225 (cell) zapien@email.arizona.edu Guest Instructor: Dr. Lella Gandini, UA Visiting Professor Site Address: Emily Meschter Early Learning Center 4605 N. La Cholla Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85705 Phone: (520) 696-8909 University Address: Teaching, Learning and Sociocultural Studies Department College of Education, University of Arizona 1430 E. Second Street, Rm. 512 Tucson, AZ 85721 Office hrs: Before and after class and by appointment as needed Course Description This course focuses on theories of language and emergent literacy development and how these theories inform practice in early childhood education, particularly as they apply to children birth through age 5. The acquisition of the sounds, syntax and meanings of language (both 1 Information in this syllabus, other than grade and absence policies, may be subject to change or expansion with reasonable advance notice as deemed appropriate by the instructor. Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE lexical and pragmatic) as well as the relation between oral language development and concepts of print, emergent literacy, family and community contexts are examined along with issues stemming from language diversity. This course will emphasize particularly the community literacy context and family practices that influence the language development of children. Also covered is the body of research in basic science and pedagogy, which undergirds both the knowledge of early childhood development as well as bridging the design of effective curriculum and instruction (TTE 309) in a variety of early childhood classroom settings. Expanded Course Description LRC 312c focuses on several theories of language development and early literacy and how these theories inform practice in early childhood education for children birth through age 8. Specifically, we will study the acquisition of the sounds of language, the syntax and meanings of language (both lexical and pragmatic), the relation between oral language development, concepts of print, emergent literacy, and the metaphor of the “hundred languages” in the Reggio Emilia approach within the contexts of home, family, community and school. We will also examine issues stemming from language diversity in both private and public schools including English and native language development, biliteracy, and the impact of language educational policies and programs on young language minority students and their families. This particular semester, an emphasis on community literacy context will provide pre-service teachers to not only learn about how community context impacts children’s language and literacy development, but also become actively involved in several community projects, workshops, or events taking place in the larger Tucson community. Actively participating in such events will grant pre-service teachers to better understand the relationship between language and literacy development within the context of community. The purpose of these activities is to broaden the understanding of language and literacy developing beyond the home and beyond commonly accepted forms of language and literacy in the classroom because literacy can be found in various domains and through different expressive means. Department of Teaching, Learning and Sociocultural Studies Position Statement on Social Justice2 The members of the TLSS community are committed to providing equal opportunity and nurturing an academic climate dedicated to social justice. Injustice takes many forms. Oppressive acts are sometimes overt, but most are subtle, and are difficult to document. These hidden forms of discrimination are identified in the literature as microaggressions, often resulting from unexamined attitudes and beliefs. Macroaggressions are expressions of both the overt and systemic forms of injustice. Our commitment to social justice reflects an orientation to our goals and practices in education and ultimately, an orientation to life that values a diversity and inclusion of viewpoints and 2 Adopted March 25, 2014 Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE experiences of all people as valuable contributors to the experience of schooling and society. This stance recognizes that individuals bring a variety of linguistic, social, and cognitive strengths from their families and communities into the classroom; we view these strengths as assets. o o o o o o We value and honor human diversity. We recognize that all relationships include dynamics of power. We are committed to relating to each other with conscious awareness and sensitivity to these power dynamics. We pledge to contribute to expanding the linguistic and cognitive strengths that learners possess and bring with them to the classroom. We understand that systemic policies, traditions, and laws along with personal beliefs, experiences and attitudes affect personal relationships and equitable treatment and opportunity for all. We strive to provide a context where we all have the venue, the opportunity, and the confidence to express our experiences and that these experiences will be heard constructively, critically, and with sensitivity. Hence, we are not color blind. We will not erase who someone is in the name of equality, nor deny the historical, material and emotional impacts of racialized and gendered identities, and colonial legacies. We stand alongside and speak out with our colleagues, staff, students, and community members when any of us or others experience micro- or macroaggressions. We recognize that those of us who enjoy privileged status due to our racialized, gendered, heteronormative, or otherwise privileged aspects of our identities may be unaware of the ways this privileged status marginalizes others. We pledge to listen to our colleagues, students, staff, and community members when any of us or others make efforts to remain diligent in maintaining awareness of micro, macroaggressions, and raise our awareness around issues of invisibility, marginalization, normativity, power, and privilege. We view these goals as both crucial and ambitious. The entrenched nature of oppression requires both institutional restructuring and new social discourses. Therefore, our stance on disrupting existing and persisting inequities requires attention to micro and macro level interactions. Every interaction is an opportunity for disrupting processes of marginalization, whether overt or subtle, both through person-to-person exchange and through resisting oppressive structures and systems. We commit to holding one another and ourselves accountable, through our research and practice, to rejecting entrenched inequalities, and to cultivating new discourses as groundwork for imagining new social worlds. Course Purpose and Objectives The purpose of LRC 312c is to provide students with the knowledge and critical thinking to explore and understand different aspects of children’s language development, emergent literacy, developmentally appropriate practices, and research-based design principles that guide curriculum development and instruction. Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE The following are the course objectives and Arizona and NAEYC professional standard to which they are linked: 1. Students will understand the process of oral and written language acquisition and development in early childhood (AZ Standards for Teaching 8.4; NAEYC Standard 1; AZ Early Learning Standard Language & Literacy Development, strands 1-3). 2. Students will understand the process of oral and written language socialization in early childhood (AZ Standards for Teaching 5 & 7.4; NAEYC Standard 4; AZ Early Learning Standards: Social & Emotional Development, strands 1-4; Language & Literacy Development, strands 1-3; Social Studies Development, strand 4). 3. Students will explore the relationship between language and literacy with particular reference to young English language learners (AZ Standards for Teaching 8.6; NAEYC Standards 1 & 4; AZ Early Learning Standard: Language & Literacy Development--strands 1-3). 4. Students will use performance assessment strategies to evaluate young children’s language and literacy knowledge (AZ Standards for Teaching 2.1 4.2, 4.3, & 4.5; NAEYC Standards 3 & 4). 5. Students will understand the influence of cultural, social, and political factors on the development of early language and literacy (AZ Standards for Teaching 1.4, 1.5 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, & 2.4; NAEYC Standards 1 & 4; AZ Early Learning Standards: Social Emotional Development, strand 1-4; Social Studies Development, strand 4). 6. Students will understand the relationship of theory to practices affecting young language learners (AZ Standards for Teaching 1.7, 1.8, 1.12, 2.9, & 2.10; NAEYC Standards 1, 3, & 4; AZ Early Learning Standard: Language & Literacy, strands 1 & 2). In addition to the State and NAEYC standards, we have redesigned our UA Early Childhood Education Program to follow four core principles based on the above standards and outstanding research on the field of early childhood education. The UA ECE Principles, established and designed by the UA CREATE project (see website createarizona.org) are the following (principles emphasized for this course*): Principle 1: Promote early childhood educators' understanding of the cultural knowledge and competencies (“funds of knowledge”) within diverse cultural communities. Principle 2: Use stories as a base for children’s understanding of themselves and others. Principle 3*: Involve families in literacy education for children – and for teachers. Principle 4*: Provide prospective and practicing teachers and teacher educators with opportunities to work and reflect together in community and school settings. Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE Website Links to Professional Standards Arizona Early Learning Standards: http://www.ade.state.az.us/earlychildhood/downloads/EarlyLearningStandards.pdf Arizona Professional Teacher Standards: http://www.ade.state.az.us/certification/downloads/Teacherstandards.pdf National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC): http://www.naeyc.org/faculty/pdf/2001.pdf Assignments, Grading, and Classroom Decorum University of Arizona Professional Standards Teacher candidates at the University of Arizona demonstrate a commitment to their academic program and to education by: • attending, being on time, and being prepared for scheduled classes and field experiences; • having a professional appearance; • communicating professionally and respectfully orally and in writing with peers, colleagues, instructors, K-12 students, teachers, administrators, families, and community members; • looking beyond self and respecting differences of race, ethnicity, language, social class, national allegiance, cultural heritage, disability or perceived disability, gender, and sexual orientation; • accepting and acting upon reasonable criticism; • understanding and respecting others’ perspectives; • questioning and testing their assumptions about teaching and learning; • separating personal and professional issues; • exhibiting their knowledge through inquiry, critical analysis, and synthesis of the subject; • maintaining or exceeding the minimum grade point average of 2.5 G.P.A. Basic Classroom Policies Policy on Absences— In teacher preparation courses at the College of Education, we focus on your learning. To lay a strong foundation for your development as a professional in four semesters is a challenge. Time in academic courses and time in classrooms is at a premium, and we strive to engage you fully in both. Our courses integrate knowledge and practice and are performance-based. We model practices for you to learn and ask you to demonstrate your understanding of the content. Because courses are preparation for your career as teachers, being dependable, responsible, and punctual are behaviors that you must exhibit. The children whom we teach as well as their families and the community expect this of us when we are in schools, and so the faculty in the College of Education expect this of you during the semesters you are in the Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE program. Being dependable, responsible and punctual are signs of the professional behavior we expect you to demonstrate while at the College of Education and throughout your professional career. We have high expectations of you, possibly higher than you have experienced before the program. In accordance with the University of Arizona Academic Policy for class attendance, the following guidelines are in place: Plan to be in class and in your classroom every day scheduled at your site. o Any personal events you have, such as doctor's appointments, vacations, family events, or hours at work, should be planned to for Fridays or after your course and classroom times have ended. Personal events should not conflict with coursework and classroom hours. o All holidays or special events observed by organized religions will be honored for those students who show affiliation with that particular religion. These absences, as well as other excused absences, require the completion of the Exception to Attendance form, with proper explanation of why the absence merits exception. o Absences pre-approved by the UA Dean of Students (or Dean's designee) will be honored (for example, absences required of athletes). Arriving to class on time and being prepared are professional behaviors. We will start class promptly each day. If you arrive more than 5 minutes late, or leave more than 5 minutes early, this will be noted. o Three or more late arrivals or early departures may constitute an unexcused absence. We know that unexpected events occur. You are allowed one excused absence from class for illness or personal emergency. The reason for the excused absence must be justifiable and for the most part unplanned and unavoidable, for example a car accident or an unexpected illness that results in an emergency room visit (Keep in mind that we have a different class format so plan to be there and only be absent in real emergency cases). o In order for the one absence to be excused, you must: notify your instructor or mentor teacher and site coordinator within 24 hours. complete and provide the site coordinator with the Exception to Attendance form. make arrangements for another student to gather handouts and take notes for you if you are missing coursework. You are responsible for catching up on any missed material. Make arrangements to make up the hours of fieldwork if you are missing being with your mentor teacher. Multiple absences may indicate issues that need to be addressed because they may reflect a lack of professionalism. More than one excused or any unexcused absences will result in a conference with the instructor(s). o In addition, prior to or after the conference, a “Referral for Performance Concerns” may be completed and a meeting with the instructor(s) and the Program Director will be scheduled. The referral and subsequent meeting Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE are to address and find a possible resolution to the absences. o Multiple excused or unexcused absences may result in lowering your grade by one full letter. For example, if you were receiving an A in the course, the highest grade you could receive is a B. o Multiple excused or unexcused absences may result in a failing grade for the course, unless a valid and justifiable reason has been provided, or as per University policy, “excessive or extended absences from class is sufficient reason for the instructor to recommend that the student be administratively dropped from the course.” Attendance during your fieldwork is critical. Your mentor teacher and students depend on you. o Your arrivals and departures along with attendance will be noted on a time sheet in the classroom. o If your tardies, early departures and absences in applications exceed the attendance policy described above, your grade may be lowered to a full grade in EACH of your courses. For example, if you were receiving a B in each of your courses, you would receive a C in EACH of your courses. Class participation—Students are expected to arrive in class on time, prepared and ready to participate. Participation means actively contributing to discussions that will occur in class by listening to others, asking questions and taking part in whole class and small group discussion. Regular attendance means coming on time, staying for the entire class session and attending outside-of-class activities (when assigned). In addition, 3-5 questions will be posted Sundays on D2L, which will guide you through your readings; in addition to helping you to think critically thinking about your readings. Questions will also serve as suggested topics discussed in class, so be prepared to discuss these in class – you will be asked to submit your notes. Students who are frequently unprepared may receive a lower grade in the class. Class participation is essential for the success of this course and your learning experience! Assignments—Late Projects. While “life happens” or computers crash when we least expect it, good time management of your work in this class is critical to successful course completion. As a result, some flexibility is built into the assignment of project/paper due dates. You are expected, however, to turn in projects on the date due unless you have been granted permission by the course instructor well in advance of the due date (no less than 2 days). Papers or assignments that are not delivered on the due date where no allowance has been made will be reduced by one-third of a letter grade for each day the product is late. (One third of a letter grade represents, for example, moving from an A- to a B+). NOTE: There are computers and printers available in the computer lab (4th floor), therefore, in general, computer/ printer failure is not an excuse for late assignments. Students with Special Rights. If you anticipate issues related to the format or requirements of this course, please meet with me. I would like us to discuss ways to ensure your full participation in the course. If you determine that formal, “disability”related accommodations are necessary, it is very important that you be registered with Disability Resources (621-3268; drc.arizona.edu; 1224 E. Lowell Street) and notify me of Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE your eligibility for reasonable accommodations. We can then plan how best to coordinate them. NOTE: Instructors are not allowed to provide classroom accommodations to a student until appropriate verification from Student Disability Services has been provided. Policy on Cell Phones. Please turn off cell phones and beepers so as not to disturb others during class time (this means no cell phones on working tables). Advise the instructor when personal circumstances require any different communication access. Policy on Computers or iPads. 10% of your grade depends on participation, which will be graded at the end of the semester points at the end of the semester for excellent attentiveness to, and participation in, class activities. Inattentive or disruptive behavior in class will result in a loss of points from your class participation grade. Texting or other use of cell phones (or iAnything) in class will result in a deduction from your class participation grade, as will inappropriate use of computer devices. Use of computer during class is only allowed if used for class activities (not for texting or emailing or twitting). Instructors will let students know in advance if computers will be needed for a particular session to complete an assignment. Advise the instructors when personal circumstances require any different communication access. Format for written papers. All written assignments must be typed and double-spaced on a 12” font with 1” margins and follow recommended guidelines for Documentation of your Case Study. Required Texts 1. Otto, B. (2010). Language development in early childhood (3rd edition.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. 2. Owocki, G., & Goodman, Y. (2002). Kidwatching: Documenting children’s literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Please bring these texts with you to class each session!! You will likely need to reference information in the readings during class sessions. The class sessions will NOT be introducing this material, but rather expecting you to USE the information in class activities and discussions. Recommended Texts Otto, B. (2008). Literacy development in early childhood: Reflective teaching for birth to age 8. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall Gandini, L., & Edwards, C.P. (Eds.). Bambini; The Italian Approach to Infant/Toddler Care. New York: Teachers College. Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE Evaluation Process 1. Attendances, Reading and Class Participation (10%): Students are expected to do the reading BEFORE class, so that you can contribute meaningfully to class discussion. Class participation in lecture and part of small group discussion are part of this grade. In addition, participation in literacy community and family events will count also as part of class participation and you will be expected to attend (see minimum participation requirements as part of your final assignment). Use of cell phones or other electronic devices during class will result in a deduction from your class participation grade. 2. D2L Discussion Questions and Participation (10%): Students are expected to answer the discussion questions on D2L before each class. Three-five questions will be posted on Sundays; students will be able to choose 2-3 questions to answer and/or reply to other students’ comments. Additional details about this on-going assignment will be provided in class. 3. In Class Pop-Quiz (3 Quizzes throughout the semester-- total 10%): The quizzes will give students an opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge of the material presented so far in the readings. This will include true/false questions, and multiple choices (no make up quizzes). 4. Community Literacy Walk Reflection (10%): DUE on Thursday March 24, 2015 The print that surrounds children in urban communities can provide an excellent source of literacy conversation and learning. By taking literacy walks with children in their community, teachers can learn much about children’s everyday literacy and their worlds. Faulstich Orellana -1999. As part of this project you will take a literacy walk around your site and community to explore the print environment that is part of the children’s everyday routine. We will model our first literacy walk during class time (February 3) and will divide in small groups to understand the documentation process around the print environment and resources in the community around Emily’s Place. Then, you will do your own walk to document print awareness and resources that are part of your case study student’s everyday literacy environments (make sure to read chapter 3 in Kidwatching and the assigned D2L reading). Answer and submit the following questions and documentation of your two literacy walks in a 4-5 pp report. a. (Literacy Walk-with Team Partner) What did you learn about the children’s community and neighborhood as part of our literacy walk in class? b. What did you learn about the child’s literacy environment and the family’s neighborhood as part of the literacy walk? c. How are home and community influencing language and literacy development of the child? d. Include documentation (images, flyers, maps) of your literacy walk as part of your assignment. Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE 5. Language Observation Assessment and Socio-cultural Family and Community knowledge Case Study (Midterm 30%): DUE on April 7, 2015. Please follow the following format for your Language Observation Assessment and Sociocultural Family and Community knowledge Case Study Report/Documentation. You will need to conduct two home engagements to complete this portion of your assignment. You will submit this electronically via D2L: INTRODUCTION For your midterm assignment summarize your observations and oral language and literacy assessment from the various parts of the project (see a-c below) in a double-spaced paper format. This documentation will turn to be about 8-10 pages long once you put parts A and B together. NOTE: Don’t just think of the page number, but rather focus on whether you have been able to successfully answer all the questions from this assignment. Part A. Oral Language Development Assessment (Family Interaction 4): Audio or video-tape an infant, toddler, or young preschool child verbalizing in his or her home language for a total of 60 minutes. You may need to tape multiple episodes. Transcribe (about 10-15 mins) and analyze the vocalizations for specific words and their relation to the child’s home environment and the context in which that verbalization and interaction happened (e.g., who participated in this interaction, where in the home was the interaction taking place). For example, if the child is at the telegraphic speech stage, analyze the verbalizations for the syntactic-semantic-patterns discussed in your textbook or if the child is using (or not) regular verb conjugation to express him/her-self, or other aspects of her/his language for communicating and expressing her/his ideas and theories (**HINT: Review particularly Language Development in Early Childhood as part of chapters 3). We will be discussing the various themes throughout the first half of the semester. In addition, the following questions should be answered in this section to share what you learned from this experience: 1. Write a description of the child, including age, sex, past experience with language learning, and literacy environment 2. What happened during your home engagement? 3. What did you learn about the child’s home language and literacy environment? 4. What particular activities within the home and community are helping the child develop language and literacy? Part B. Socio-Cultural Knowledge and Family Interview/Dialogue (Family Interaction 5): Prepare the appropriate surveys and interview questions (in the heritage language if needed) following the guidelines in Kidwatching chapter 2. *Review and decide what questions and information you would need to ask the parents/primary Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE caregivers in order to learn and be able to explain the language and literacy development of your case study child (you could also draw from your previous semester LRC 411 family interactions and field notes). Then, arrange with your assigned case study family and preschool aged child who is becoming aware of print and conventional reading, a home engagement with the parents or other family members to learn about the language and literacy environment and the literacy funds of knowledge and family literacy practices that this child is exposed to at home and in his or her community. Reflect and answer on the following questions: 5. What did you learn from your interview with the child’s family? 6. What did you learn about the child’s home language and literacy environment as part of this “interview” and home engagement? All students will present an in progress-mid term report of their case study on Tuesday April 7. Be selective about the examples that you want to share in class –each team will have 10 minutes to do this presentation. Remember that you can use ANY documentation, either pictures, a power point presentation, audio, video; in case you have gathered ANY emergent writing and drawing documentation from your case study (last semester ones can count too!) these can be great for presentation! HAVE FUN DOING THIS ASSIGNMENT-IT WILL BE AN ENRICHING LEARNING EXPERIENCE FOR YOU AND ALL OF US –INCLUDING THE CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES!! 6. Benchmark Assignment: Child and Family Language and Literacy Development Case Study Final Documentation (25%) & Presentation (5%) (Total 30%)3: DUE on May 13, 2015. For this final project, you will continue to work with your preschool aged case study child (if possible follow the same child from language observation assignment-- Midterm) who is just becoming aware of print. For this final assignment you will add your knowledge and assessment of your case study’s literacy development during classroom instruction with her/his teacher and peers, and in other contexts such as home, and literacy community events. You and your class partner will analyze and present a longitudinal documentation of what you learned from this experience. See guidelines below: Section A. General Summary and Description Write a description of how your case study child has grown and how s/he has developed language and emergent literacy throughout the year that you have spent with the child and her/his family. Specifically, you will choose two activities from the Kidwatching book (i.e., Books and Book Handling; Oral Reading and Miscues; Writing) and complete your year-long in-depth case study where you have been assessing the child’s language and literacy milestones. For this final documentation describe the developmental process 3 Rubric attached to syllabus Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE and literacy experiences of your child case study. You will also reflect and document your own process as a learner, Kidwatcher, and as an educator: What are your observations about this young child’s language and literacy development? What kind of language and literacy practices is this child exposed to at home and in the community? What conclusions have you made about what young children believe about reading and the support that the different features of text give to readers (e.g. color, language, familiarity with the product)? Finally, include a self-reflection on what you have learned as an educator and how have you been able to develop a relationship with the family and child. Section B. Using Data to Inform Instruction You will be responsible for bridging the connection between home and school through the opportunities you create for children. In this part of the assignment, you will be asked to use your knowledge to create a language activity that will support the child’s learning of language. In this assignment, you need to: 1. Develop and write a rationale for the activity. You should use materials/readings from the courses this semester to develop your rationale. 2. Create a plan of action, including: Goals of the activity Resources/materials you will use Structures that you will set up You should describe your plan to carry out and implement this activity in the classroom. Describe the artifacts you would use to implement this activity. Section C. Family and Community Literacy Event Describe your participation at a Community Literacy event and how this supports your teaching as an educator: Students will have the option of participating and inviting the case study child to attend a literacy event organized by CREATE or other public literacy event (e.g., sports spectacular, Emily’s Place event, CREATE Community Literacy Canasta, or a library event) where you will interact and describe the child’s literacy interaction with family and peers. As part of your final documentation, you are expected to reflect on the observations made throughout the semester by making connections of what you learned about the target child both within the home and out in the community. As a result, relate your observations, findings with the assigned readings from class in the language and literacy field. Discuss with your instructor the main topic that you’re interested in exploring for your final documentation and presentation. (Arizona Professional Teaching Standards: 1.1, 1.12, 3.3, 3.5, 4.2, 4.5, 7.5, 8.4, & 8.6; NAEYC Standards: 1, 2, 4, & 5; AZ Early Learning Standard: Language & Literacy, strands 1 & 2) Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE The Benchmark Assignment is a performance based assessment that evaluates your progress toward meeting the Arizona Professional Teaching Standards: InTASC standards; NET*S Standards; and the University of Arizona Professional Standards. In order to pass this course, you must pass the Benchmark Assignment. Even if you receive passing grades on all other assignments, if you fail the Benchmark Assignment, you will fail the class. Passing the Benchmark Assignment means you have met the objectives of the course, which are tied to the Arizona Professional Teaching Standards: InTASC standards; NET*S Standards; and the University of Arizona Professional Standards. Failing the Benchmark Assignment means that you have failed to demonstrate mastery of objectives of the course, which are tied to Arizona Professional Teaching Standards: InTASC standards; NET*S Standards; and the University of Arizona Professional Standards. Course Final Grading scale: A: B: C: D: 90-100% 80-89% 70-79% 60-69% Tentative Calendar: Session Date Session I January 21 Session II February 3 Session III February 17 4 Class Theme Assigned Reading4 Introduction & Syllabus Language, Ch 1 & 2 (D2L) -Theories of early language and literacy development in infants & toddlers Connecting and bridging between children’s early language and literacy development and our observations through family interactions and community. The Hundred Languages of Children: Learning from the Reggio Emilia Approach Guest Lecture by Dr. Lella Gandini on the process of Documentation. Kidwatching, Preface Language/ Ch. 3 Kidwatching/ 1, 2, 3 Orellana & Hernández* (1999) (D2L) Assignment Due *Re-connect with your case study child and family *Re-connect with your case study child and family & Schedule Home Engagement *Community Literacy Walk (together in class) Bambini/ Chapters 1, 2, 4 &10 (D2L) *Case Study Home Engagement #1 Readings and assignments are to be completed before the class session to which they are assigned. Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE Session IV March 3 March 1422 Session V March 24 Fostering Language and Literacy Development Through School-Family Home Connections UA SPRING BREAK Language/ Ch. 14 *Family Panel: Philosophy, Significance of SchoolFamily Home Connections ENJOY!! Enhancing Language Development of Infants and Toddlers: Language/ Chapters 4-5 Kidwatching, 4-5 *Case Study Home Engagement #2 Language, Literacy, & Play in and out of the classroom context Discussion: Child and Family Literacy Case Study *Community Walk Reflection *Midterm reflection is due on April 1st by midnight Session VI April 7 Session VII April 21 Enhancing Language Development in Preschoolers Enhancing Language Development in Kindergartners Language/ Chapters 6-7 Language/ Chapters 8-9 Kidwatching: Chapters 67 Session VIII May 5 Field work in School, Home and Community –Reflecting and Finalizing Documentation of the Case Study DL2 Reading Final Session May 13 Final Project Study Documentation & Presentations Final Case Study Documentation & Presentations *Case Study/Midterm Presentation *Community and Family Literacy Event Participation with your case study child and family [April 7 – May 5] *Literacy Event Participation with your case study child and family *Literacy Event Participation with your case study child and family Submit Case Study Documentation-Reflection [Benchmark Assignment] by May 11th at midnight Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE NOTE: Our personal philosophy on academic reading in general is that it is better to read more slowly and deeply—particularly with intellectually challenging material—than quickly and widely just to cover a broad range of diverse work. However, one can cover a great deal of ground by reading “deeply” on a regular basis—in other words, daily reading adds up to a substantial amount in a very few years and over a lifetime. So—read slowly, take notes, make marginal glosses, define the new terms you encounter, and write summaries to yourself regarding key points in each chapter. If you highlight—make a small note as to why this passage deserves such special distinction. Don’t wait until the last minute to do the reading since it may take several hours of reflection as well as two or three times through each chapter before you feel confident to talk about it—and you will be required to do this. In short, give yourself time to absorb the concepts and be patient with your initial rate of learning and understanding. It will increase over the semester as you will see. Student Polices, Procedures and Codes - Last Updated 04.19.04 All University of Arizona students should familiarize themselves with the UA codes, policies and procedures. The Dean of Student's Office has developed this information to provide guidance for students attending UA. It includes information about policies, procedures, rights and responsibilities that should be followed by students. Since the student codes, policies and procedures may be revised semester to semester, it is the responsibility of the student to view revisions. For more information, please contact the Dean of Students Office. Please review these websites regarding University of Arizona student policies: Academic Conduct: http://dos.web.arizona.edu/uapolicies/ Disruptive behavior: http://web.arizona.edu/~policy/disruptive.pdf Threatening behavior: http://policy.web.arizona.edu/threatening.pdf Student Disabilities Center: http://drc.arizona.edu/teach/syllabus-statement.html Spring 2015, Tuesday 8:00am-12pm, Community SITE Rubric Benchmark Assignment Rubric (30%) Section A (10%) 5 4 3 2 1 There is evidence showing the observation of the child’s emergent literacy and language development throughout the semester, and indications of the child’s literacy practices and experiences in the home and community. Clear connections between the child’s emergent literacy development and the readings are made to demonstrate your knowledge. Field notes and self-reflection are provided to support your observation and analysis. Section B (10%) 5 4 3 2 1 There is rationale of designing the particular language activity for your case study child. The plan of activity meets all the criteria (i.e., goals, resources, materials, artifacts, tasks, and implementation), and the connection of home and school is well explained throughout the plan. Section C (10%) 5 4 3 2 1 There is evidence showing student’s participation at the Community Literacy event. Your exploration, observation, reflections are fully addressed in your work, and connected to your learning throughout this semester. Final Documentation and Presentation (5%) 5 4 3 2 1 The documentation of your project is presented in the format (e.g. poster, artifacts, PowerPoint, etc.) that best allow the audience to catch the major insights of your documentation throughout this semester and implication as an educator.