General Assembly 2 – MEDIMUN 2015 – 10th Annual Session. By Stelios Fiakkas and Katie Kapodistria Topic 1 Promoting the correct use of monetary funds in LEDCs as a means of increasing spending on areas such as education and health care and combating corruption Introduction Healthcare and educational demands in less economically developed countries (LEDCS) are changing. Ensuring access to clean water and sanitation, battling ongoing transmitted diseases and controlling the amount of preventable deaths still dominate the healthcare agenda in many countries. In the meantime, the need for a stable and effective education system from a young age appears to be highly necessary. Primarily located in the continents of Africa and South America, LEDCs are not setting aside sufficient funds to invest in their educational sectors, in order to help the population climb out of poverty, nor in their health sectors, which is leading to a higher mortality rate. Aside from this, corruption continues to be an ongoing problem in these regions. Since poor people have low access to education, and are therefore uninformed about their rights, this leaves them more easily exploited and excluded. Key Terms Monetary funds: A reserve of money set aside for some purpose. (Usually a government wanting to spend money on services and infrastructure within the country) Healthcare: The maintenance and improvement of physical and mental health, especially through the provision of medical services. Less Economically Developed Countries (LEDCs): Implies a low standard of living, with a high death rate, large population count and extreme conditions of poverty. Corruption: The misuse of public power for a private gain. Those in charge will typically abuse a decision-making process, in order to be benefited personally in the end. Infrastructure: The basic physical and organizational structures and facilities (e.g. buildings, roads, and power supplies) needed for the operation of a society. Literacy rate: Percentage or number of people who can read and write. Mortality rate: Percentage or number of deaths in a specific area or period, or from a particular cause. The Abuja Declaration: A pledge taken in April 2001 by the African Union to increase government spending on health to at least 15%. General Overview LEDCs spend significantly less money on education in comparison to more developed parts of the world, and children in these regions very often must work in order to help out their families financially, not enabling them to go to school and receive a primary education. Good education presently seems impossible to come by if you are poor, causing literacy rates to drop; it’s so expensive that it is only available to those than can afford it. The poor are marginalized with substandard government schools. In Africa, for example, schools lack basic facilities, and universities may suffer from overcrowding, as well as facing the difficulties of retaining staff that are attracted overseas by higher pay and better conditions. Due to this, 40% of Africans over the age of 15, as well as 50% of women above the age of 25, are illiterate. When regions of the world are compared in terms of long run economic growth, Sub-Saharan Africa ranks at the bottom along with Latin America, due to the fact that governments are not investing adequate monetary funds towards widespread education, and so, less and less people in these regions are able to be educated and escape poverty. At the same time, LEDCs aren't spending a sufficient amount of their funds on health care services for the population, causing the spread of diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis, and above all, HIV/AIDS. Continued high rates of maternal and child mortality and rising rates of injuries linked to violence, particularly in urban areas, are weighing down a system that is already inadequate to the challenges facing it. Healthcare delivery infrastructure is insufficient; skilled healthcare workers and crucial medicines are in short supply; and poor acquirement and distribution systems are leading to unequal access to treatment. Public-sector funding for healthcare remains uneven across the African continent. While 53 African countries signed the Abuja Declaration pledging to devote 15% of their national budgets to health, most remain far from that target and, according to some estimates, seven countries have actually cut their spending on health over the past decade. In the meantime, corruption in many developing countries stands in the way of improving crucial sectors of the education and healthcare systems. Corruption has been going on for centuries in the LEDCs, even during the slave trades when traditional rulers would sell their own people for their own interest. At a national level, people’s effective participation and representation in society can be undermined by corruption, while at local levels, corruption can make day to day lives more painful for all affected, causing extreme poverty and low standards of living. Major Countries Involved Some Examples of LEDCs and Developing countries: Afghanistan, Angola, Argentina, Cambodia, Central African Republic, Chad, Cuba, Eritrea, Gabon, Haiti, Madagascar, Nigeria, Paraguay, Uganda, Sudan, Zambia, Zimbabwe. Sources www.independent.co.uk www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ http://www.janssenemea.com/sites/default/files/The%20Future%20of%20Healthcare%20in%20Africa .pdf http://europafrica.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/education-discussion-paper-jeg26th-march-2009.pdf http://web.mit.edu/12.000/www/m2015/2015/ledc_medc_edcomparison.html www.bbc.co.uk http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/archivestory.php/aid/291/Fighting_corruption_i n_the_developing_countries.html Feel free to add any additional information you find, as long as it’s valid and truthful. Any falsified information will be punished, so try to write original resolutions of your own work to the best of your abilities. Topic 2 Persuading the BRIC countries to impose stricter environmental controls for their industrial activities. Executive summary The rapid rate at which the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa have in recent years been closing the gap with the developed world has been breath- taking. The popular BRICS acronym referring to these rising powers has in the last decade come to signify the major shifts underway in global economic and political relations. Yet those who assume that the patterns of growth observed in the last 20 years will continue un- abated should bear in mind that the BRICS states face considerable obstacles to their individual paths of development. These obstacles include the threat of political and social instability arising from extreme social inequality and rampant corruption, as well as problems caused by an inadequate infrastructure unable to keep apace of the rapid economic growth seen in recent years. Further obstacles include massive environmental problems and the weight of demographic pressures on labor markets and education and social welfare systems. Agenda 21 In 1992 at the UNCED after 5 years of deliberation and negotiation more than 178 nations signed Agenda 21 which has been described as “the sustainable development bible”. Agenda 21 transformed the Brundtland report into a codified UN document palatable to the majority of governments party to it. It is not, however, a legally enforced international treaty but instead a non-binding resolution and “Its successful implementation is first and foremost the responsibility of Governments”. Agenda 21 is an international call to national governments to implement measures that would ensure the security of development for all.’ Pollution in BRICS Environmental issues in Brazil include deforestation in the Amazon Basin, illegal wildlife trade, illegal poaching, air and water pollution, land degradation and water pollution caused by mining activities, wetland degradation and severe oil spills, among others. As the home to approximately 13% of all known species, Brazil has one of the most diverse collections of flora and fauna on the planet. Impacts from agriculture and industrialization in the country threaten this biodiversity. As a developing or newly industrialized nation, Brazil is notable for taking a lead in environmentally friendly initiatives. In the field of biofuels, Brazil is the second-largest producer of ethanol in the world. It is also home to two sustainable cities. Nevertheless, environmental issues remain a major concern in Brazil. There are numerous environmental issues in Russia. Many of the issues have been attributed to policies during the Soviet Union, a time when officials felt that pollution control was an unnecessary hindrance to economic development and industrialization. As a result, 40% of Russia's territory began demonstrating symptoms of significant ecological stress by the 1990s, largely due to a diverse number of environmental issues, including deforestation, energy irresponsibility, pollution, and nuclear waste. Inefficient energy usage and the use of fossil fuels is another environmental issue that Russia faces. The Ministry of Fuels and Energy stated that upgrading energy sector equipment could cut carbon emissions by 25%, and the Energy Research Institute predicts that such measures could save up to $1 billion of fuel every year. 68% of Russia's energy is produced by polluting fossil fuels, and it is a large producer of those fuels. There are many environmental issues in India. Air pollution, water pollution, garbage, and pollution of the natural environment are all challenges for India. The situation was worse between 1947 through 1995. According to data collection and environment assessment studies of World Bank experts, between 1995 through 2010, India has made one of the fastest progress in the world, in addressing its environmental issues and improving its environmental quality. Still, India has a long way to go to reach environmental quality similar to those enjoyed in developed economies. Pollution remains a major challenge and opportunity for India. Environmental issues are one of the primary causes of disease, health issues and long term livelihood impact for India. Pollution is one aspect of the broader topic of environmental issues in China. Various forms of pollution have increased as China has industrialized, which has caused widespread environmental and health problems. According to the Chinese Ministry of Health, industrial pollution has made cancer China’s leading cause of death. Every year, ambient air pollution alone killed hundreds of thousands of citizens. 500 million people in China are without safe and clean drinking water. Only 1% of the country’s 560 million city dwellers breathe air considered safe by the European Union, because all of its major cities are constantly covered in a "toxic gray shroud". Before and during the 2008 Summer Olympics, Beijing was "frantically searching for a magic formula, a meteorological deus ex machina, to clear its skies for the 2008 Olympics." Lead poisoning or other types of local pollution continue to kill many Chinese children. A large section of the ocean is without marine life because of massive algal blooms caused by the high nutrients in the water. The pollution has spread internationally: sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides fall as acid rain on Seoul, South Korea, and Tokyo; and according to the Journal of Geophysical Research, the pollution even reaches Los Angeles in the USA. Some environmental issues that affect South Africa are: water pollution, air pollution, land degradation, solid waste pollution, and deforestation. The environmental damage affects not only the population’s health, but also the species that live in the area, while also contributing to the world-wide issue of climate change. This corrosion severity map of South Africa schematically summarizes 20 years of atmospheric exposure testing. The coastal regions extending some 4-5 km inland tend to be most corrosive due to the effect of wind swept chlorides. High humidity levels tend to exacerbate the detrimental effects of such chlorides. Key Terms: BRICS countries: The BRIC [Brazil, Russia, India and China] idea was first conceived in 2001 by Goldman Sachs as part of an economic modeling exercise to forecast global economic trends over the next half century; the acronym BRIC was first used in 2001 by Goldman Sachs in their Global Economics Paper No. 66, “The World Needs Better Economic BRICs”. The BRICS Business Council: The BRICS Business Council is composed of 25 prominent entrepreneurs from Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, representing various industries and sectors in the BRICS nations. Environmental health: is the branch of public health that is concerned with all aspects of the natural and built environment that may affect human health. Environmental protection: is a practice of protecting the natural environment on individual, organizational or governmental levels, for the benefit of both the natural environment and humans. Monetary funds: A reserve of money set aside for some purpose. (Usually a government wanting to spend money on services and infrastructure within the country) Overview The BRICS are both the fastest growing and largest emerging market economies. They account for almost three billion people, or just under half of the total population of the world. In recent times, the BRIC have also contributed to the majority of world GDP growth. According to various economists projections, it is only a matter of time before China becomes the biggest economy in the world - sometime between 2030 and 2050 seems the consensus. In fact, Goldman Sachs believe that by 2050 these will be the most important economies, relegating the US to fifth place. By 2020, all of the BRIC should be in the top 10 largest economies of the world. Hence it is important to encourage this rapidly expanding growth on sustainable methods of production and prevent further pollution of the environment. Sources http://thebricspost.com/ http://topics.bloomberg.com/sustainable-development/ http://www.sgi-network.org/brics/ http://www.globalsherpa.org/bric-countries-brics http://www.brics5.co.za/about-brics/ www.bbc.co.uk www.cnn.com http://www.brics-info.org/ www.un.org/en/ Topic 3 Measures to prevent the decline of the elephant population in Africa Introduction Elephants are vital to the web of life in Africa. As a keystone species, they help balance all the other species in their ecosystem, opening up forest land to create firebreaks and grasslands, digging to create water access for other animals, and leaving nutrients in their wake. Sometimes called the "megagardeners of the forest," elephants are essential to the dispersal of seeds that maintain tree diversity. The African elephant once ranged across most of the African continent from the Mediterranean coast to the southern tip. It is thought there may have been as many as 3-5 million African elephants in the 1930s and 1940s. However, in the wake of intensive hunting for trophies and tusks, elephant numbers fell dramatically throughout the continent from the 1950s. In the 1980s, for example, an estimated 100,000 elephants were being killed per year and up to 80% of herds were lost in some regions. In Kenya, the population plummeted by 85% between 1973 and 1989. Key Terms Poaching: The illegal hunting, killing or capturing of wild animals without the landowner's permission Ivory: A hard creamy-white substance composing the main part of the tusks of an elephant, often used to make ornaments and other trinkets. General Overview The African elephant population had been on the decrease for the past century or so, and with the alarming rate at which poaching and hunting is occurring, these creatures are close to soon being extinct. In Central Africa, Congo, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Gabon hold the majority of the sub-region’s known elephants, but at the same time, monitoring of elephant populations, apart from at a few well-monitored sites, is sporadic and inconsistent. The low precision of most estimates makes it difficult to detect any immediate repercussion on elephant numbers in the short-term but this does not mean there are no changes. The species remains threatened by illegal hunting for meat and ivory, habitat loss and human-elephant conflict. Most range states do not have adequate capacity to protect and manage their herds. If conservation action is not forthcoming, elephants may become locally extinct in some parts of Africa within 50 years, and this huge scale of losses of African elephants could reduce genetic diversity to the point where healthy and robust populations become dangerously weakened. In countries where wildlife management authorities are chronically under-funded, poaching is a chronic and dangerously significant problem. Thriving but unmonitored domestic ivory markets continue in a number of states, some of which have few elephants of their own remaining. These markets fuel the illegal international trade. Ultimately, the illegal killing of elephants for ivory is driven and sustained by demand from consumers who are willing to pay for illegal ivory, as measured by the excessive household consumption of ivory in China. While it remains to be seen whether the situation is stabilizing, it is clear that international cooperation on law enforcement and public awareness is vital. Improved monitoring is also essential to allow informed decision-making regarding the killing of so many elephant herds. Major Countries and Organizations Involved IFAW (International Fund for Animal Welfare): Founded in 1969, the International Fund for Animal Welfare saves individual animals, animal populations and habitats all over the world. Advocating against the trade chain and trafficking of ivory, IFAW has pioneered ivory destruction events in the USA, UK, France and Belgium. Countries, ranging from elephant range states to ivory consumer nations, publicly destroy their confiscated ivory stockpiles through burning and crushing. Sources http://www.ifaw.org/united-states/our-work/elephants/ending-ivory-trade http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/08/140818-elephants-africapoaching-cites-census/ http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-29929423 http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/endangered_species/elephants/african_elephant s/