Proposed Loan to Starbucks Corporation Presentation to the JPMorganChase Loan Committee Paul Byers and Cody Meglio December 3, 2007 Financial Statement Analysis – Fall 2007 Purpose of the loan The Starbucks Corporation (NASDAQ:SBUX) seeks a $350 million loan to purchase a controlling interest in The Cheesecake Factory, Inc. (NASDAQ:CAKE). Starbucks believes that this purchase would create a mutually beneficial working relationship between the two companies. A line of products from each company would be sold at the stores of both chains Starbucks is confident that Cheesecake’s management, business practices, strategy, and long term vision will continue to make Cheesecake a successful and profitable venture. Specifics of the deal Starbucks officials have already approached Cheesecake Factory’s BOD Cheesecake has agreed to issue Starbucks 21 million new shares of common stock @ $23 each. This will give Starbucks a 20.42% stake in Cheesecake. Starbucks has planned to fund the purchase 27.5% through sale of marketable and available-for-sale securities and with cash About The Starbucks Corporation Operates European-style coffeehouses in the United States and abroad Markets “The Starbucks Experience” Operates about 10,500 stores worldwide Has a goal of 20,000 locations in the United States and 20,000 locations overseas Recently experienced competition from low cost fast-food chains and doughnut shops Has launched a new advertising campaign About The Cheesecake Factory, Inc. Operates full-service, upscale, casual dining restaurants Manages 128 locations Offers a full bar and a lavish décor in all locations Boasts an extensive menu features over 200 selections Serves 50 varieties of cheesecakes and desserts Operates bakery production facilities in California and North Carolina Corporate Mix The two companies are compatible with one another Both companies focus on a growth strategy High financial performance has been a hallmark of both firms The value in catering to more affluent customers who are less price sensitive is recognized Both companies strive to recruit and retain good employees to ensure superior customer service Preservation of brand value is a priority in both firms Quick Ratio 2.00 1.75 1.50 1.25 1.00 0.75 0.50 0.25 - 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Cheesecake Factory 0.89 1.13 0.84 1.15 1.12 Starbucks 1.10 0.99 1.24 0.54 0.46 Debt/Equity Ratio 1.05 0.90 0.75 0.60 0.45 0.30 0.15 - 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Cheesecake Factory 0.22 0.34 0.40 0.43 0.46 Starbucks 0.29 0.34 0.37 0.68 0.99 EBITDA/Minimum Fixed Obligations Ratio 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Cheesecake Factory 2.11 2.05 2.08 2.40 1.96 Starbucks 2.31 2.43 2.64 2.67 2.52 Return on Equity 28.00% 24.00% 20.00% 16.00% 12.00% 8.00% 4.00% 0.00% 2003 2004 2005 2006 Cheesecake Factory 13.69% 13.31% 14.79% 11.97% Starbucks 13.99% 17.13% 21.68% 26.93% Operating Profit Margin 15.00% 12.00% 9.00% 6.00% 3.00% 0.00% 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Cheesecake Factory 10.78% 10.58% 10.20% 10.98% 8.12% Starbucks 9.62% 10.42% 11.46% 12.25% 11.48% Year-over-Year Net Sales Growth 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 2003 2004 2005 2006 Cheesecake Factory 18.69% 25.25% 21.96% 11.27% Starbucks 23.92% 29.90% 20.31% 22.26% Ratio Analysis Summary Both companies are more profitable and more liquid than the peer group The debt paying ability of Starbucks is sufficient to cover loan payments Overall, both companies are stable, and, because of the market segment each caters to, both should still be stable in the case of an economic downturn Sales and profits are continuing to grow at an impressive pace for both companies Concerns Yearly financials Starbucks have been restated or reclassified and these have been material In the beginning years, Starbucks’ equity earnings from Cheesecake will not cover the loan payments by itself Future growth may be too slow or fast Customers could fail to accept new products Either company’s brand could deteriorate Competition could consume either company’s market share Final Recommendation We recommend that Starbucks be granted the $350 million loan The companies have compatible management strategies and growth goals The future for each company looks promising both numerically and qualitatively We anticipate that the management teams for both companies can successfully mitigate all concerns