1 TLS 416 Fall 2015 UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TEACHING, LEARNING & SOCIOCULTURAL STUDIES TLS 416: Introduction to Structured English Immersion (SEI) Fall 2015 (3 credits or 45 hours) Schedule: Tuesdays, 12:00 – 2:45 pm School: Emily’s Place Instructor: Chee Hye Lee, Ph.D. Language, Reading & Culture Office/room number: TBA Telephone: 621-1311 (LRC office) Email: chlee@email.arizona.edu (best way to contact me) Office hours: TBA (or by appointment) COURSE DESCRIPTION Theory and practice in sheltered content instruction for English language learners. Also considered are historical and political contexts for the education of English learners, national and state education policies affecting ELLs, and the relationship between these policies and second language acquisition theory. EXTENDED DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES The increasing presence of English language learners (ELLs) in Arizona schools and elsewhere in the nation has made more apparent the need for quality instruction for these students. In addition, national and state education policy developments (e.g., the federal No Child Left Behind legislation, Flores v. Arizona, and Arizona’s Proposition 203) have focused attention on a program known as “Structured English Immersion” (SEI), in which teachers use a methodology called “Sheltered English content instruction.” The Arizona Department of Education requires all pre-service education students who seek teaching certification in the state to have completed 6 credits, or 90 hours, of SEI training. Consequently, LRC 416 will provide you with 3 credits/45 hours. For undergraduates, the remaining hours will be completed during your student teaching experience in an on-line class and on-site applied practice. Both classes will provide you with state-required SEI endorsement. This course will consider, among other issues, the historical and political context of education for ELLs and their families, the relationship between national and state education policy mandates and theories of first and second language acquisition, applied research in bilingual education and English as a Second Language, assessment of English learners, and thematic and sheltered instructional approaches to second language teaching in academic settings. We will also explore implementation of the “Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol” (SIOP) model developed by researchers and teachers affiliated with the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) and the National Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence (CREDE). The principal goal of the course is to engage prospective teachers in thoughtful ways of planning and implementing a variety of ELL teaching strategies that will promote the learning of academic content and the acquisition of English language and literacy by ELL students. TLS 416 Fall 2015 2 REQUIRED READINGS/MATERIALS This year, the Pearson Publishing Company has put together a custom textbook especially for our class. The book combines two publications: (1) Reiss, J. (2008). 120 Content strategies for English language learners, 2nd Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill-Prentice Hall. (2) Echevarría, J. & Graves, A. (2011). Sheltered content instruction: Teaching English learners with diverse abilities. 4thEdition. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. It is less expensive to combine the two than having you purchase two books. A border memoir or narrative from the list on our course’s D2L site (books are available online from www.amazon.com or www.barnesandnoble.com, or you can ask the U of A bookstore to order it for you). Additional readings are available on our class D2l site [www.d2l.Arizona.edu] or provided as handouts in class. Very important: You will need to purchase a three-ring binder in which to organize and keep track of your course handouts, notes, worksheets and study questions. Doing this will help you keep track of your work. Your binder will be submitted at the end of the semester for your participation grade. ATTANDANCE POLICY In teacher preparation courses at the College of Education, we focus on your learning. To lay a strong foundation for your development as a professional in four semesters is a challenge. Time in academic courses and time in classrooms is at a premium, and we strive to engage you fully in both. Our courses integrate knowledge and practice and are performance-based. We model practices for you to learn and ask you to demonstrate your understanding of the content. Because courses are preparation for your career as teachers, being dependable, responsible, and punctual are behaviors that you must exhibit. The children whom we teach as well as their families and the community expect this of us when we are in schools, and so the faculty in the College of Education expect this of you during the semesters you are in the program. Being dependable, responsible and punctual are signs of the professional behavior we expect you to demonstrate while at the College of Education and throughout your professional career. We have high expectations of you, possibly higher than you have experienced before the program. In accordance with the University of Arizona Academic Policy for class attendance, the following guidelines are in place: Plan to be in class and in your classroom every day scheduled at your site. o Any personal events you have, such as doctor's appointments, vacations, family events, or hours at work, should be planned to for Fridays or after your course and classroom times have ended. Personal events should not conflict with coursework and classroom hours. o All holidays or special events observed by organized religions will be honored for those students who show affiliation with that particular religion. These absences, as well as other excused absences, require the completion of the Exception to Attendance form, with proper explanation of why the absence merits exception. 3 TLS 416 Fall 2015 o Absences pre-approved by the UA Dean of Students (or Dean's designee) will be honored (for example, absences required of athletes). Arriving to class on time and being prepared are professional behaviors. We will start class promptly each day. If you arrive more than 5 minutes late, or leave more than 5 minutes early, this will be noted. o Three or more late arrivals or early departures may constitute an unexcused absence. We know that unexpected events occur. You are allowed one excused absence from class for illness or personal emergency. The reason for the excused absence must be justifiable and for the most part unplanned and unavoidable, for example a car accident or an unexpected illness that results in an emergency room visit. o In order for the one absence to be excused, you must: a. notify your instructor or mentor teacher and site coordinator within 24 hours. b. complete and provide the site coordinator with the Exception to Attendance form. c. make arrangements for another student to gather handouts and take notes for you if you are missing coursework. You are responsible for catching up on any missed material. d. Make arrangements to make up the hours of fieldwork if you are missing being with your mentor teacher. Multiple absences may indicate issues that need to be addressed because they may reflect a lack of professionalism. More than one excused or any unexcused absences will result in a conference with the instructor(s). o In addition, prior to or after the conference, a “Referral for Performance Concerns” may be completed and a meeting with the instructor(s) and the Program Director will be scheduled. The referral and subsequent meeting are to address and find a possible resolution to the absences. o Multiple excused or unexcused absences may result in lowering your grade by one full letter. For example, if you were receiving an A in the course, the highest grade you could receive is a B. o Multiple excused or unexcused absences may result in a failing grade for the course, unless a valid and justifiable reason has been provided, or as per University policy, “excessive or extended absences from class is sufficient reason for the instructor to recommend that the student be administratively dropped from the course.” Attendance during your fieldwork is critical. Your mentor teacher and students depend on you. o Your arrivals and departures along with attendance will be noted on a time sheet in the classroom. o If your tardies, early departures and absences in applications exceed the attendance policy described above, your grade may be lowered to a full grade in EACH of your courses. For example, if you were receiving a B in each of your courses, you would receive a C in EACH of your courses. Department of Teaching, Learning and Sociocultural Studies Position Statement on Social Justice Adopted March 25, 2014 The members of the TLSS community are committed to providing equal opportunity and nurturing an academic climate dedicated to social justice. Injustice takes many forms. Oppressive acts are sometimes overt, but most are subtle, and are difficult to document. These hidden forms of discrimination are identified in the literature as microaggressions, often resulting from unexamined attitudes and beliefs. Macroaggressions are expressions of both the overt and systemic forms of injustice. Our commitment to social justice reflects an orientation to our goals and practices in education and ultimately, an orientation to life that values a diversity and inclusion of viewpoints and experiences of all people as valuable contributors to the experience of schooling and society. This TLS 416 Fall 2015 stance recognizes that individuals bring a variety of linguistic, social, and cognitive strengths from their families and communities into the classroom; we view these strengths as assets. We value and honor human diversity. We recognize that all relationships include dynamics of power. We are committed to relating to each other with conscious awareness and sensitivity to these power dynamics. We pledge to contribute to expanding the linguistic and cognitive strengths that learners possess and bring with them to the classroom. We understand that systemic policies, traditions, and laws along with personal beliefs, experiences and attitudes affect personal relationships and equitable treatment and opportunity for all. We strive to provide a context where we all have the venue, the opportunity, and the confidence to express our experiences and that these experiences will be heard constructively, critically, and with sensitivity. Hence, we are not color blind. We will not erase who someone is in the name of equality, nor deny the historical, material and emotional impacts of racialized and gendered identities, and colonial legacies. We stand alongside and speak out with our colleagues, staff, students, and community members when any of us or others experience micro- or macroaggressions. We recognize that those of us who enjoy privileged status due to our racialized, gendered, heteronormative, or otherwise privileged aspects of our identities may be unaware of the ways this privileged status marginalizes others. We pledge to listen to our colleagues, students, staff, and community members when any of us or others make efforts to remain diligent in maintaining awareness of micro, macroaggressions, and raise our awareness around issues of invisibility, marginalization, normativity, power, and privilege. We view these goals as both crucial and ambitious. The entrenched nature of oppression requires both institutional restructuring and new social discourses. Therefore, our stance on disrupting existing and persisting inequities requires attention to micro and macro level interactions. Every interaction is an opportunity for disrupting processes of marginalization, whether overt or subtle, both through person-to-person exchange and through resisting oppressive structures and systems. We commit to holding one another and ourselves accountable, through our research and practice, to rejecting entrenched inequalities, and to cultivating new discourses as groundwork for imagining new social worlds. STANDARD ADDRESSED *“Addressed” means that the students are assessed on the standards that are listed. Students in the Elementary Education Program are assessed on Arizona Department of Education Professional Teaching Standards which are based on the Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) Standards; the International Society for Technology in Education National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (ISTE NETS-Teacher); and the University of Arizona Teacher Preparation Programs Professional Standards as well as other national standards. The Standards work in concert. By addressing them, graduates of the Elementary Education Program demonstrate that they are professionals and are prepared to participate in the very important process of educating young children. Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) International Society for Technology in Education-National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers (ISTE NETS-Teacher) University of Arizona Teacher Preparation Programs Professional Standards 4 TLS 416 Fall 2015 5 National Association for the Education of Young Children Standard for Initial & Advanced Early Childhood (NAEYC) Communities as Resources in Early Childhood Teacher Education (CREATE) Arizona Professional Teaching Standards: InTASC Standards Standard #1: Learner Development. The teacher understands how learners grow and develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and physical areas, and designs and implements developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences. Standard #2: Learning Differences. The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards. Standard #3: Learning Environments. The teacher works with others to create environments that support individual and collaborative learning, and that encourage positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation. Standard #4: Content Knowledge. The teacher understands the central concepts, tools of inquiry, and structures of the discipline(s) he or she teaches and creates learning experiences that make the discipline accessible and meaningful for learners to assure mastery of the content. Standard #5: Application of Content. The teacher understands how to connect concepts and use differing perspectives to engage learners in critical thinking, creativity, and collaborative problem solving related to authentic local and global issues. Standard #6: Assessment. The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress, and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision making. Standard #7: Planning for Instruction. The teacher plans instruction that supports every student in meeting rigorous learning goals by drawing upon knowledge of content areas, curriculum, cross-disciplinary skills, and pedagogy, as well as knowledge of learners and the community context. Standard #8: Instructional Strategies. The teacher understands and uses a variety of instructional strategies to encourage learners to develop deep understanding of content areas and their connections, and to build skills to apply knowledge in meaningful ways. Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice. The teacher engages in ongoing professional learning and uses evidence to continually evaluate his/her practice, particularly the effects of his/her choices and actions on others (learners, families, other professionals, and the community), and adapts practice to meet the needs of each learner. Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration. The teacher seeks appropriate leadership roles and opportunities to take responsibility for student learning, to collaborate with learners, families, colleagues, other school professionals, and community members to ensure learner growth, and to advance the profession. The ISTE NETS and Performance Indicators for Teachers (NETS-T) TLS 416 Fall 2015 6 Standard #1: Facilitate and Inspire Student Learning. Teachers use their knowledge of subject matter, teaching and learning, and technology to facilitate experiences that advance student learning, creativity, and innovation in both face-to-face and virtual environments. Standard #2: Design and Develop Digital Age Learning Experiences and Assessments. Teachers design, develop, and evaluate authentic learning experiences and assessment incorporating contemporary tools and resources to maximize content learning in context and to develop the knowledge, skills and attitudes identified in the NETS*S. Standard #3: Model Digital Age Work and Learning. Teachers exhibit knowledge, skills and work processes representative of an innovative professional in a global and digital society. Standard #4: Promote and Model Digital Citizenship and Responsibility. Teachers understand local and global societal issues and responsibilities in an evolving digital culture and exhibit legal and ethical behavior in their professional practices. Standard #5: Engage in Professional Growth and Leadership. Teachers continuously improve their professional practice, model lifelong learning, and exhibit leadership in their school and professional community by promoting and demonstrating the effective use of digital tools and resources. University of Arizona Professional Standards Teacher candidates at the University of Arizona demonstrate a commitment to their academic program and to education by: attending, being on time, and being prepared for scheduled classes and field experiences; having a professional appearance; communicating professionally and respectfully orally and in writing with peers, colleagues, instructors, K-12 students, teachers, administrators, families, and community members; looking beyond self and respecting differences of race, ethnicity, language, social class, national allegiance, cultural heritage, disability or perceived disability, gender, and sexual orientation; accepting and acting upon reasonable criticism; understanding and respecting others’ perspectives; questioning and testing their assumptions about teaching and learning; separating personal and professional issues; exhibiting their knowledge through inquiry, critical analysis, and synthesis of the subject; maintaining or exceeding the minimum grade point average of 2.5 G.P.A. National Association for the Education of Young Children Standard for Initial & Advanced Early Childhood Standard #1: Promoting child development and learning. Candidates prepared in early childhood degree programs are grounded in a child development knowledge base. They use their understanding of young children’s characteristics and needs, and of multiple interacting influences on children’s development and learning, to create environments that are healthy, respectful, supportive, and challenging for each child. Standard #3: Observing, documenting, and assessing to support young children and families. Candidates prepared in early childhood degree programs understand that child observation, documentation, and other forms of assessment are central to the practice of all early childhood professionals. They know about and understand the goals, benefits, and uses of assessment. They know about and use systematic observations, documentation, and other effective assessment strategies in a responsible way, in partnership with families and other professionals, to positively influence the development of every child. TLS 416 Fall 2015 7 Standard #5: Using content knowledge to build meaningful curriculum. Candidates prepared in early childhood degree programs use their knowledge of academic disciplines to design, implement, and evaluate experiences that promote positive development and learning for each and every young child. Candidates understand the importance of developmental domains and academic (or content) disciplines in early childhood curriculum. They know the essential concepts, inquiry tools, and structure of content areas, including academic subjects, and can identify resources to deepen their understanding. Candidates use their own knowledge and other resources to design, implement, and evaluate meaningful, challenging curriculum that promotes comprehensive developmental and learning outcomes for every young child. Communities as Resources in Early Childhood Teacher Education (CREATE) Principle 1: Promoting early childhood educators' understanding of the cultural knowledge and skills -- “funds of knowledge" -- within diverse cultural communities. Principle 4: Providing prospective and practicing teachers and teacher educators with opportunities to work and reflect together in community and school settings. UNIVERSITY POLICIES Behavior in an Instructional Setting: It is assumed that students will not demonstrate disruptive behavior. See http://policy.arizona.edu/disruptive-behavior-instructional for more information. This includes: Possession of drugs, alcohol or firearms on university property is illegal. Smoking and soliciting are not allowed in classrooms. Eating and drinking only allowed with prior approval of the instructors. Pets, telephones, pagers and other electronic devices that distract students are not allowed in classrooms. Students creating disturbances that interfere with the conduct of the class or the learning of other students will be asked to leave and campus police may be contacted. The classroom should be a safe place; therefore, we expect students to respect the teaching/learning environment and each other. We do not tolerate any form of harassment. All cell phones, pagers, and other electronic devices should be turned off in the University and school classrooms. If you have an emergency situation, you may set your phone on vibrate and step out of class to receive a call. This exception must be explained to the instructors prior to the class. Student Code of Academic Integrity: See http://deanofstudents.arizona.edu/codeofacademicintegrity for more information. Integrity is expected of every student in all academic work. All student’s submitted work must be his or her own. It is expected that all papers and lesson plans be original (i.e., created by the student), typed, neat, proofread, and grammatically correct. Plagiarism in any form will not be tolerated. It is assumed that the Student Academic Code of Integrity will be adhered to. Integrity is expected of every student in all academic work. The guiding principle of academic integrity is that a student's submitted work must be the student's own. Academic dishonesty will not be tolerated under any circumstances, and will result in a failure to pass this course. Misrepresenting the words or ideas of another as your own is called plagiarism. The key to avoiding plagiarism is to develop good judgment in the fair attribution of words and ideas. You must credit the source whenever you (a) directly quote the words of another or (b) reference a specific idea, argument, or fact from a given source. You should err on the side of caution and cite the source of any specific TLS 416 Fall 2015 8 ideas, concepts, or facts that you use. Conduct prohibited by the Code consists of all forms of academic dishonesty. Plagiarism Cheating, fabrication, facilitating academic dishonesty, and plagiarism is defined in the Student Code of Conduct, ABOR Policy 5-308-E.6, E.10, and F.1. Plagiarism typically means attributing and submitting an item of academic work that is not your own, but for which you have taken credit. In some cases, it also means not citing primary or secondary sources in your written academic work. My experience is that most students submit work in good faith, but may not know how to cite their sources. If you have questions about citation styles, please be sure to ask me (don’t be shy, that’s my job). However, if you hand in a written assignment without proper citations, I will ask you to redo it. If you would like more information about plagiarism and how to avoid it, the SALT Center provides a useful definition at its website 1 : http://www.salt.arizona.edu/tutoringFiles/handouts/Plagiarism.pdf Threatening Behavior by Students: See http://policy.web.arizona.edu/threatening-behavior-students for more information. The University seeks to promote a safe environment where students and employees may participate in the educational process without compromising their health, safety or welfare. The Arizona Board of Regents’ Student Code of Conduct, ABOR Policy 5-308, prohibits threats of physical harm to any member of the University community, including to one’s self. Threatening behavior can harm and disrupt the University, its community and its families. “Threatening behavior” means any statement, communication, conduct or gesture, including those in written form, directed toward any member of the University community that causes a reasonable apprehension of physical harm to a person or property. A student can be guilty of threatening behavior even if the person who is the object of the threat does not observe or receive it, so long as a reasonable person would interpret the maker’s statement, communication, conduct or gesture as a serious expression of intent to physically harm. Disruptive Behavior: The University of Arizona defines disruptive conduct in the following way: “Conduct that materially and substantially interferes with or obstructs the teaching or learning process in the context of a classroom or educational setting. Disruptive behavior includes conduct that distracts or intimidates others in a manner that interferes with instructional activities, fails to adhere to an instructor's appropriate classroom rules or instructions, or interferes with the normal operations of the University” (http://web.arizona.edu/~policy/distuptive.pdf). The following in-class behaviors are highly distracting and disrespectful; they will not be tolerated: Answering, speaking, or text messaging on cellular phones (particularly irritating to your instructor, who will more than likely ask you publicly to cease and desist) Laptop computer email correspondence, internet surfing, or working on non-course-related material Open or overt reading of material not related to the course Engaging in extended private conversations Sleeping in class Special Needs and Accommodations It is the University’s goal that learning experiences be as accessible as possible. If you anticipate or experience physical or academic barriers based on disability or pregnancy, please let me know immediately so that we can discuss options. Students who need special accommodation or services should contact the Disability Resources Center, 1224 East Lowell Street, Tucson or 621-3268 or email: uadrc@email.arizona.edu or 1 The SALT Center (Strategic Alternative Learning Techniques) is located at 1010 N. Highland Ave, 621-1242. TLS 416 Fall 2015 9 http://drc.arizona.edu/. You must register and request that the Center or DRC send me official notification of your accommodations needs as soon as possible. Please plan to meet with me to discuss accommodations and how my course requirements and activities may impact your ability to fully participate. The need for accommodations must be documented by the appropriate office. Please be aware that the accessible table and chairs in this room should remain available for students who find that standard classroom seating is not usable. Optional: Social Media: Because you are in a professional program, your on-line presence is as important as your in-person presence. The University of Arizona has Social Media Guidelines that are informative and can help you be more informed when using social media. Please review: http://www.hr.arizona.edu/social_media_guidelines. Policy on Incompletes Incompletes are difficult for me and for you. They also are unfair to your colleagues in the class who have completed course requirements within the scheduled time. Therefore, I strongly discourage incompletes and will allow them only for extreme emergencies. Students who receive incompletes can expect to earn only a grade of B or below. Additional Class Expectations Cell Phones: Cell phones and other electronic devices are not appropriate for class time. Text messaging and checking calls on vibrate is considered disrespectful. Turn all such devices OFF during class. Respect and Community: In a course of this nature, discussions and participation is extremely important. When one person is talking, everyone should attentively listen. Work actively to become involved and get to know one another; no one enjoys a course where only a few students dominate class sessions. Reading Assignments: The syllabus and schedule give an overview of the topics and readings for most of the semester. Students are expected to stay current with all of the readings. If a reading is noted for a specific date, content from the assignment will be prerequisite knowledge for that day’s class. In other words, READ BEFORE COMING TO CLASS. Written Assignments: Due dates for all major assignments are listed in the class schedule. All assignments are due at the beginning of class. Intellectual honesty in completing assignments is expected. Violations of scholastic ethics are considered serious offenses. All work done for this class must be on your own, unless otherwise cited. All assignments must be completed prior to finals for students to be recommended for student teaching. HARD COPIES OF ASSIGNMENTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED. Field experience requirements Your fieldwork experience is intended to provide you opportunities to observe, teach and work with a cooperating teacher. Your fieldwork is tied to coursework through these specific assignments for this course LRC 416. In addition to those assignments, it is your responsibility to make the most of the fieldwork by showing initiative and participating fully in a variety of ways. Remember: since you are not a student teacher, it is not appropriate for you to be left alone with children. You are held accountable for both the hours spent in fieldwork as well as the quality of your participation in class. COURSE ASSIGNMENTS & REQUIREMENTS If you turn in your assignment after class it will be considered late and I will reduce one letter grade for TLS 416 Fall 2015 10 each day late. Out of respect for your classmates I will not make exceptions. No extra credit will be extended. For all your written assignments use Microsoft Word, 12 pt. Times New Roman font, double space with 1” margins. Use the proper citation and include a list of reference when appropriate. Please pay attention to spelling, grammar, style, and punctuation. Sloppy, ungrammatical, unpunctuated, and misspelled papers will be graded accordingly. 1. Course Goals (5 points) For some of you, the issues covered in this class will be familiar, for others, less so. Consequently, I am interested in hearing what your expectations for the course are, that is, what new knowledge and information you’d like to leave with, and your own goals for the course. You should write a couple of paragraphs (in class, on the first day) detailing these goals. 2. Reading and Participation (20 points) To collaborate effectively we must create a learning community where we treat each other with patience and respect. We can learn from each other; thus, an essential part of this course is your participation in small group discussions. I want every student to feel safe expressing his/her own opinion. You must bring readings or your notes, which includes your questions, comments, and ideas about the topic in advance. In order to show you participation, at the end of the semester, you are to submit your binder with your classwork (worksheet). The list of classwork will be provided. All your classwork should be completed when you submit. Not complete classwork will not be counted as completion. (10 points) InTASC 3; ISTE NETS-T 5 3. Reading Logs (40 points) You write four reading logs throughout the semester and turn them in on the due date listed on the course schedule. The reading logs are a way for you to reflect on how the content we learn in class applies to your classroom experience. The reading logs are also a way for you to further comment on the readings and/or class discussions, activities, films, etc., and as questions about ideas you are still thinking about. The reading logs are to be 2-3 pages (no more than 3 pages); double spaced; font 12; Times, New Roman, and APA style. Each reading log is worth 10 points. You will be graded on clarity, content, and your ability to analyze the connections between theory and practice. All reading logs should be submitted in d2l dropbox. InTASC 3; ISTE NETS-T 5 In order to avoid plagiarism, you need to cite. Whenever we are writing a paper or a project, you always need to cite your source. Your source can be the textbook or an article that we read for the class, or it can be from online (newspaper article, chart or graph, powerpoint from d2l, etc). You need to cite when you quote (direct quote) a source and when you paraphrase a source. To quote means that you are using the author’s exact words in your paper. To paraphrase means to restate the words of the author in your own words. In the Language, Reading, and Culture, we use American Psychological Association (APA) style. You can either get the APA style guidebook from the library or visit website (https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/) for more information. 4. Language Acquisition Autobiography (30 points) There are three possibilities for this assignment: TLS 416 Fall 2015 11 a. You should describe your own acquisition of a second language (age you acquired it, how well you acquired it; formal or informal methodologies used to teach you; means of retaining the language, if any, and finally, your knowledge and understanding of the cultures and peoples associated with that language). b. If you speak only English, but have traveled outside of the United States or interacted with bicultural/bidialectical or multicultural communities within the U.S., you may write about that experience, concentrating on your exposure to the languages, cultures, peoples, geographies, etc. c. If you speak only English, and have not traveled internationally, you may write about how you think English language learners are taught, or should be taught, in Arizona public schools (don’t worry if your knowledge of this subject is limited: the purpose of this assignment is for you to discuss whatever you know about how students learn English and academic content). Undergraduate papers should be 3-5 pages. All must be typed and double-spaced. Please pay attention to spelling, grammar, style, and punctuation. Sloppy, ungrammatical, unpunctuated, and misspelled papers will be graded accordingly. Language Acquisition Autobiography should be submitted in d2l dropbox (11:59am on Due date). 5. SEI Classroom Observation (30 points) A visit to and written description (field notes) of a local primary, intermediate or secondary SEI/ELD classroom in area school districts. Because every teacher and pre-service teacher in Arizona is potentially an SEI teacher as well, I would like you to visit and describe an SEI classroom in the Tucson metropolitan area. You may select the school district and grade level. You will take field notes and write a narrative based on the notes (we will talk about how to do this in the first few weeks of the course). If you have contacts in a particular school and wish to observe there, you are welcome to do so. I can also help you select a school. This visit must take place before September 29. Please attach your hand-written field notes to your description. SEI Classroom Observation paper should be submitted in d2l dropbox (11:59am on Due date) Your fieldwork experience is intended to provide you opportunities to observe, teach and work with a cooperating teacher. Your fieldwork is tied to coursework through these specific assignments for this course, TLS 416. In addition to this assignment, it is your responsibility to make the most of the fieldwork by showing initiative and participating fully in a variety of ways. Remember: since you are not a student teacher, it is not appropriate for you to be left alone with children. You are held accountable for both the hours spent in fieldwork as well as the quality of your participation in class. 6. Funds of Knowledge Portfolio (75 points) It is important for us to understand that learning occurs beyond our classrooms. Students bring to school vast and diverse experiences, knowledge, and cultural and linguistic resources that sometimes teachers fail to recognize and/or integrate in the curriculum. The goal of this portfolio is to complete a series of assignments that will help us identify the family’s funds of knowledge and utilize them as learning resources. This portfolio includes the following assignments. You can complete each assignment with your “visiting-partner”. However, in the final portfolio each of you must include an TLS 416 Fall 2015 12 individual reflection of what you learned from this project. ALL the assignments of Fund of Knowledge are due as listed on the course schedule, and should be submitted on d2l dropbox. a. Family/Home Engagement Visit (25 points) Before interviewing/visiting the family, reflect on your experiences in the contexts (family and school) you grow up. Then, based on the family you are interviewing/visiting, reflect on the general perceptions of the ethnic group this family comes from (e.g. Latino –Mexican, Central American, Puerto Rican, Somalia, Asian, etc). Once you have identified or know which family – parents- you are interviewing describe your perception of that family (how do you perceive them; and finally describe your family and differences bases on what you have reflected. Conduct a home visit with a family you are following as part of your case study. In this home visit you will focus on the family’s linguistic and literacy resources. In 7 other words, you will pay close attention to the functions oral and written language serve, the language that family members use to talk, write, etc. After each visit you will write detailed field notes. You must include a reflection on how can you incorporate this linguistic/literacy funds of knowledge in your curriculum. Reflect on how you would use what you have learned about your student and his /her family in your classroom. Are there any connections you can make based on your background knowledge? Describe them. InTASC 1,2,3,4; NAEYC 1,3,5 b. Parent(s) Interview (25 points): The purpose of this project is to build on your previous interview/visit. You will continue to explore the parents’ perspectives regarding home-school expectations, language use, etc. You will interview the parents or caregivers of your assigned student. If possible, you will record and transcribe the interview verbatim (i.e. every word spoken). If recording is not possible, then you will write detailed field notes after your visit. Include a reflection based on what you learn from this experience (guidelines posted on D2L). InTASC 1,2,3,4; NAEYC 1,3,5 c. Community map (25 points): The goal of this project is to understand the value of community as a resource for our students. It also provides future teachers an opportunity to explore and make connections with the communities where our students live. You will investigate a total of 5 different community resources and/or community cultural wealth resources available to your student and his/her family within two miles radius from your student’s home. Some resources you might include are local churches, non-profit organizations, activist groups, government based institutions, special programs provided in the community, translation services, mom & pop businesses, yard art, cemeteries, gardens, symbolic resources, etc. You will create a community map, where you will map out the location of the different community resources you identified. This map must: each resource Include a reflection about what you learned from this project. NAEYC 1,3,5 7. Sheltered Lesson Plan (50 points) 13 TLS 416 Fall 2015 You will design one lesson plan in the content area of your choice; it should include many of the sheltered strategies we cover in class, as well as language and content objectives. Lessons should be 34 pages. We will talk more about the form and content of this lesson plan later in the semester. Sheltered Lesson Plan should be submitted on d2l dropbox (11:59am on Due date) InTASC 3,4,5,6,7,8; ISTE NETS-T 1,2,3,4,5 8. Sheltered Lesson Plan Presentation (30 points) Individually, in pairs, or triads, you will teach part of your sheltered lesson plan (note: if you present with a partner, you will have to negotiate which lesson plan to use). In your lesson, you will need to display content and language objectives before you teach your lesson, and use a minimum of six sheltered strategies. Sheltered lesson presentations typically are 10-15 minutes long, and will begin on December 4. Bring a HARD COPY of your Sheltered Lesson Plan. InTASC 3,4,5,6,7,8; ISTE NETS-T 1,2,3,4,5 9. Final E-Portfolio /Final Reflection – Benchmark Assignment (20 points) Your final portfolio should include language acquisition autobiography, classroom field note/narrative, funds of knowledge portfolio, sheltered lesson plan, and final reflection. In relation to your final reflection paper, you need to write 1-2 page reflection on your work, attendance, and participation in the course over the semester. Please re-read your goal paper and reflect on what you wrote on the first day. Final Reflection is due on the last day of class, and should be submitted on d2l dropbox. Benchmark Assignment – Final Portfolio (20 points) (required for all pre-service teachers by the Arizona Department of Education). You will put together a portfolio collection of all course assignments submitted in the class (Language Acquisition Autobiography, SEI classroom field notes, Funds of Knowledge Portfolio, sheltered lesson plan, final reflection) as well as in-class worksheets and study questions (completed individually or as a group). You may organize your portfolio in any way that is most helpful for future teaching, but it should include a table of contents (it will be provided in d2l site) and 1-2 page final reflection on your work, attendance, and participation in the course over the semester. Due on the last day of class on your E-Portfolio. The Benchmark Assignment is a performance based assessment that evaluates your progress toward meeting the NAEYC, ADE Professional Teaching (InTASC) Standards, NET*S, and UA Standards and the CREATE Principles. In order to pass this course, you must pass the Benchmark Assignment. Even if you receive passing grades on all other assignments, if you fail the Benchmark Assignment, you will fail the class. Passing the Benchmark Assignment means you have met the objectives of the course, which are tied to the NAEYC, InTASC, NET*S, and UA Standards and the CREATE Principles. Failing the Benchmark Assignment means that you have failed to demonstrate mastery of objectives of the course, which are tied to NAEYC, ADE Professional Teaching (InTASC) Standards, NET*S, and UA Standards and the CREATE Principles. GRADE POLICIES To earn a passing grade in your courses, you must successfully complete the associated classroom experience. Successful completion involves completing your classroom hours every week and making up missed hours; receiving positive evaluations from your cooperating teacher regarding your classroom performance and professionalism; and completing all required classroom assignments. Grading Criteria 14 TLS 416 Fall 2015 Assignment Reading and Participation Goal Paper Reading Logs (4 @10pts each) Language Acquisition Autobiography SEI Classroom Visit/Field Note/Narrative Funds of Knowledge Portfolio Points 20 points 5points 40 points 30 points 30 points Sheltered Lesson Plan 50 points Sheltered Teaching Lesson 30 points Standard InTASC 3; ISTE NETS-T 5 InTASC 9; ISTE NETS-T 5 InTASC 3; ISTE NETS-T 5 InTASC 1,5 InTASC 7; ISTE NETS-T 5; NAEYC 1,3,5 75 points InTASC 1,2,3,4,7; ISTE NETS-T 5; NAEYC 1,3,5 InTASC 3,4,5,6,7,8; ISTE NETS-T 1,2,3,4,5; NAEYC 1,3,5 InTASC 3,4,5,6,7,8; ISTE NETS-T 1,2,3,4,5; NAEYC 1,3,5 InTASC 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10; ISTE NETST 1,2,3,4,5; NAEYC 1,3,5 Benchmark Assignment: Final 20 points Portfolio/Final Reflection TOTAL 300 points A = 270-300 B = 240-269 C = 210-239 D =180-219 E = Below 179 The information contained in the syllabus, other than grade and absence policies, is subject to change with advanced notice as deemed appropriate by, and at the discretion of the instructors. Reading Logs should be submitted in d2l dropbox. The dropbox will be closed at 11:59am (right before the class starts). Late assignments will be accepted within a week after the due date. No later a week late assignments will be accepted. Please remind yourself that late assignments will be partially graded. CALENDAR The information contained in the syllabus, other than grade and absence policies, is subject to change with advanced notice as deemed appropriate by, and at the discretion of the instructors. Fall 2015 TLS 416 Course Schedule Module 1: General Introduction Date Week 1 Aug 25 Week 2 Sept 1 Discussion Topic Overview of course Building Community Language Immersion Lesson Demonstration Who are English Language Leaners? What challenges and rewards do they present? What is Structured English Immersion exactly? What is Sheltered English content Instruction? Reading Assignments Required Gandara & Hopkins, 2010, “The Changing Linguistic Landscape of the United States D2L Linguistic Diversity in U.S. Classrooms D2L Assignments, Activities, etc In-class activity Goal Sheet (retain it for your final reflection) Group Quiz 1 Reading Log 1 Due In-class activity 15 TLS 416 Fall 2015 Textbook: Echevarria & Graves, Chapter 3 “Sheltered English Content Instruction for ELLs” SEI and Sheltered English Definitions, handout Optional Refugees in Tucson ppt, D2l Ryan 2013, “Language Use in the United States: 2011” Module 2: State and Federal Foundations for the Education of English Language Learners Date Week 3 Sept 8 Week 4 Sept 15 Week 5 Sept 22 Discussion Topics Historical Approaches The 1C Americanization Program Contemporary Bilingual Education & English as a Second Language Programs Federal Decisions on English Language Learners The Supreme Courts decision in Lau v. Nichols (1974) Post Lau assessment policies Video Presentation: Taking back the school State Decisions on English Language Learners Proposition 203 (“English for the Children in Arizona Public Schools”) Video Presentation: Debate about Proposition 203 (ASU Law School, Tempe, September 2000) Reading Assignments Required “Mexicans and the Tucson Public School System”, D2L Textbook: Echevarria & Graves, Chapter 1 “Teaching English learners with diverse abilities” Required Lau vs. Nichols, D2L Education and Civil Rights of English Language Learners, D2L Optional May 25th Memorandum, D2L Crawford “Justice is never simple” D2L Lau vs Nichols summary NCLB Journal article, D2L Required Arizona Revised Statutes, Article 3.1, Title 15-751756.01, (Proposition 203) D2L AZ Attorney General’s Opinion on Proposition 203, D2L Combs & Nicholas, “The effect of Arizona language policy on Indigenous students,” D2L Native American Languages Act, D2L Assignments Language Acquisition Autobiography Due 1C study question worksheet ELL program models activity sheet Reading Log 2 Due Lau v. Nichols study worksheet Taking back the school –video worksheet Reading Log 3 Due State policy documents study question worksheet Video worksheet 16 TLS 416 Fall 2015 Week 6 Sept 29 State Decisions on English Language Learners School funding and English language learners: Flores v. Arizona School funding simulation activity Optional Combs, “Everything on its head: How Arizona’s Structured English Immersion Policy Re-invents theory and practice” D2L Required Flores v Arizona, D2L Biddle & Berliner, “Unequal school funding in the U.S.,” D2L Engel, “School Finance Inequality persists” D2L SEI Classroom field note observation paper Due Flores v. Arizona activity sheet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= cT1q-x2HZ0Q Optional ”Order W,” D2L House Bill 2064, D2L Horn v Arizona (Supreme Court) D2L Horn v. Flores Module 3: First and Second Language Acquisition and Development Date Week 7 Oct 6 Week 8 Oct 13 Discussion Topics First Language Acquisition & Development Video Presentation: Secrets of the Wild Child Second Language Acquisition & Development The role of culture in teaching English language learners Reading Assignments Required Piper, Language and Learning, D2L Textbook: Enchevarria &Graves, Chapter 2, “Theoretical and historical foundation” Guidelines for Home Visit (d2l) Funds of Knowledge (d2L) Optional Wild Child Speechless after Tortured Life, D2L Clark, “1st and 2nd language acquisition” D2L Required Textbook, Reiss, Chapter 1 & 2 “Theoretical considerations” & “Culture and content instruction” Reeves, “If I said something wrong, I was afraid” D2L Assignments, Activities, etc. Theoretical and historical foundations activity sheet Question prompt about Genie’s story Family/Home Engagement Paper Due L2 acquisition activity sheet Downhole heave compensator worksheet Culture in the classroom activity 17 TLS 416 Fall 2015 Gonzalez et al, “Fund of Knowledge” D2L sheet Optional Involving families in the life of the school, D2L Module 4: The Immigration and Education Interface Date Week 9 Oct 20 Discussion Topics Plyer v. Doe Arizona Immigration Laws Video Presentation: Fear and Learning at Hoover Elementary Reading Assignments Required “Plyler v. Doe”, D2L Proposition 187, D2L Browse the following: SB 1070, D2L HB 2281, D2L Assignments, Activities, etc Reading Log 4 Due Plyler v. Doe notetaker Video worksheet Module 5: Sheltered Lesson Plan Date Week 10 Oct 27 Discussion Topics SEI Classroom Observation (Debriefing) Learning styles and strategies Introduction to the SIOP model Video Presentation: SIOP Reading Assignments Required Sheltered English instructional strategies, handout Textbook, Reiss, Chapter 4, “Learning Strategies for English language learners” Textbook, Enchevarria & Graves, Chapter 5 “ Learning Strategies” Short & Echevarria, “Teacher Skills to support English language learners”, D2L Assignments, Activities, etc Community Map/Reflection Due Learning styles and mnemonics worksheet SIOP Video worksheet Creating a “warm up” content lesson Optional Genesee, “Historical and theoretical foundation of immersion education”, D2L Week 11 Nov 3 Writing Language and content objectives Activating students’ background knowledge and learning Scaffolding strategies to introduce academic content Required Textbook, Reiss, Chapter 5 & 6 “Building and activating background knowledge” & “Presenting new material” Rubinstein-Avila, “Connecting with Latino Students” D2L Moll, “Bilingual classroom studies and community analysis” D2L Writing Language Objective worksheet 18 TLS 416 Fall 2015 Week 12 Nov 10 Week 13 Nov 17 Week 14 Nov 24 Comprehension strategies to use with English language learners Text adaptation for English language learners Reinforcing content lessons: Using graphic organizers Student Interaction, practice, and application Lesson delivery checking Sheltered Lesson Plan Presentation Optional Chips, Using Cooperative Learning Short & Montone, “Integrating language and culture in the social studies” D2L Required Textook , Reiss, Chapter 7 “Did they get what I taught? Checking comprehension” SIOP Evaluation Instrument, handout, D2L Arizona ELL standard D2L Optional TESOL ESL standard D2L Required Textbook, Echevarria & Graves, Chapter 6, Textbook, Reiss, Chapter 8, “ Extending comprehension: textbook vocabulary strategies” --- Parent Interview Paper Due ELL Comprehensive Activities Extra Credit – Country Profile Due Vocabulary Activity Sheet Lesson Plan Rough Draft/ Group work Week 15 Dec 1 Sheltered Lesson Plan Presentation Continues --- Week 16 Dec 08 Final Examination End --- SEI Lesson Plan Due Final E-Portfolio/Final Reflection Due Participation Binder Due SEI Lesson Plan Due Final E- Portfolio/Final Reflection Due Participation Binder Due The Final date may change